Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska myths, Alaska realities and Alaska beer commercials

Published

on

Alaska myths, Alaska realities and Alaska beer commercials


Part of a continuing weekly series on Alaska history by local historian David Reamer. Have a question about Anchorage or Alaska history or an idea for a future article? Go to the form at the bottom of this story.

Movies and television series set in Alaska tend to emphasize myth over reality, as myth is more of an expectation for the non-Alaskan audience. Put simply, these entertainments are not made for Alaskans. Broad appeal is understandably a greater motivation than appeasing a relatively small and isolated population. In the same way, most advertising invoking Alaska targets non-Alaskans, simply employing the positive connotations of Alaska to sell their products.

Beer advertising is a subset. As difficult as it sometimes is to imagine, far more beer is consumed outside of Alaska than within. Yet, there are some exceptions. A few brands occasionally catered directly to Alaskans. A sampling of beer advertising invoking Alaska illustrates the general rule and the few counterpoints.

Advertisement

The breweries that targeted Alaska were historically more regional than national — companies small enough that Alaska constituted a significant percentage of their market. Grab your nearest old-timer and ask about Lucky Lager, Olympia and Rainier. Lucky Lager, initially based in California but later purchased by the Canadian Labatt Brewery, was one of the best-selling beers in Alaska during its mid-twentieth-century peak. That said, longtime residents might have more fond memories of Olympia and Rainier, two companies with longer histories in Alaska.

Rainier is the older of the two brands. The beer itself launched in 1878, though the company could trace its lineage back to the founding of the Washington Brewery in 1854, the first commercial brewer in Seattle. Thus, many cases of Rainier surely made their way north in the years directly after its creation. However, both beer and Alaska took off in the wake of the Klondike gold rush.

[The terrible early television shows set in Alaska]

In Skagway, the foremost Alaska boomtown of the gold rush, Rainier was inescapable, constantly advertised and featured in the local bars. It was sold as a premium beer at a premium price and was popular despite the higher cost. In a common practice then, Rainier also directly sponsored one of the most popular and enduring Skagway bars, the Mascot Saloon. In the sponsored content of its time, contemporary articles on the Mascot Saloon often included obviously paid-for wording. For example, a 1902 inventory notice in the local newspaper announced the arrival of a keg shipment. “They contain the composition of which nothing enters but the very best of Yakima hops, toned for flavor with the close-made little sundried Bohemians and a generous quantity of malt. It is a famous, creamy brew of ample body and will be on tap at the Mascott (sic) for the next three weeks.”

And the beer was notably popular with both men and women. Early Skagway featured several bars, including the Seattle Saloon, operated by Herman Grimm. In May 1901, he announced, “A large consignment of a special brew of the famous Rainier beer has just arrived and special attention will be paid to the family trade.” By “family trade,” he meant that he would sell to women during an era when it was commonly taboo for women to enter a bar by the front entrance. Around the same time, another Skagway bar, the Mascot Saloon, offered female customers a more discreet and socially acceptable rear entrance.

Advertisement

By the midcentury, Rainier was deeply entrenched in the Alaska culture. Rainier, in turn, favored Alaskans with advertisements more earnestly targeted toward them. A series of 1950s print ads drawn by Chuck Swanberg touted Rainier as the “Inside” favorite, as opposed to more obviously Outside brewers like Budweiser or Coors. The advertisements featured illustrations of distinctly Alaska locations, like Ketchikan’s Main Street, the view approaching Juneau by ship, or the Tanana River near Fairbanks. Especially in comparison to later commercials from the corporate brewers, these drawings projected an intimate familiarity with Alaska without pandering.

Some Alaskans called it the Reindeer Beer, playing off the Rainier name. The nickname was popular enough that Rainier offered a can with a reindeer on top, exclusive to Alaska markets from 1956 to 1957. Examples of this style are considered rare now.

More Alaskans will remember the brand fondly due to its long-running “Running of the Rainiers” campaign, a fixture of 1970s and 1980s television. The commercials featured oversized Rainier bottle costumes with only the human legs sticking out. The “wild” bottles were then hunted, herded, and otherwise observed in nature. The running Rainier bottles frequently appeared in Alaska, including at Anchorage rodeos and Fur Rendezvous parades.

In this typical Rainier commercial of the era, actor Mickey Rooney stalks wild Rainiers. He is accompanied by Jim Owens, the longtime University of Washington football coach. Owens was well known in Alaska during a time when the Huskies were the closest major program, against a still-developing high school scene and before the 1976 creation of the Seattle Seahawks.

Advertisement

The first batch of Olympia reached the market on Oct. 3, 1896. A year later, amid the Klondike gold rush, there was more demand in Alaska than the company could deliver. One order included a demand for 1,000 boxes of Olympia’s Pale Export. Like Rainier, OIympia developed a closer relationship with Alaskan consumers, one spiked with humor and understanding. A representative print advertisement from 1974 offered a Fairbanks Six-Pack, a case of stubby Oly bottles with a few more than six. In their words, “Everything’s just plain bigger in Alaska.”

Then there are the other beer companies. They have repeatedly attempted to cash in on that Alaska mystique, only without the connection and lighter touch exhibited by Rainier and Olympia. A circa 1973 Schlitz commercial shows someone like a park ranger or fish and wildlife agent rescuing a moose stuck in snow. “On patrol in Alaska, helping them through the winter is more than a job; it’s a life. And that’s the only way you’d have it because you know you only go around once, and you’ve got to do it with gusto.” “Do it with gusto” was a longtime Schlitz slogan.

The general themes from the Schlitz commercial are recognizable now as well-established tropes. A rugged, overtly masculine, and noble everyman, in the course of his honest physical labors, earns a beer worthy of his archetypal qualities. The Alaska setting elevates the presentation with implications of survival and mystique.

In 1976, a Miller High Life commercial featured the trans-Alaska oil pipeline, which had already become visual shorthand for Alaska in the same way that an establishing shot of the Golden Gate Bridge is shorthand for San Francisco or the Christ the Redeemer statue is for Rio de Janeiro. In comics, cartoons, shows, and movies, the trans-Alaska pipeline is the easiest, if laziest, way to ensure the viewer understands the setting. In other words, knowing about the trans-Alaska pipeline demonstrates no special understanding of Alaska.

Advertisement

“The Alaskan Pipeline, 800 of the toughest miles man has ever conquered, and up here, quitting time is Miller Time,” the commercial said. Again, there is a connection between labor and beer as a reward. A person with a beer is thus someone who has accomplished something, a winner or conqueror. Like the Schlitz example, and in keeping with most other modern beer commercials, the Miller commercial emphasized drinking beer as a social activity. In his 1987 study of beer commercials, Neil Postman wrote, “Beer is represented as the medium through which one demonstrates one’s masculinity, is initiated into the adult world, communicates with other men, expresses feelings towards them, preserves and recaptures the history of one’s group of male friends.”

A 1985 Budweiser commercial copies the Miller High Life commercial formula, swapping in a road construction crew for pipeline workers. “Me and the crew, we’re, we’re taking this road across Alaska, and we haven’t even got to the hard part yet. I guess you could say say we’re hooking up the Last Frontier to the Lower 48. Yeah, working up here, it’s different. See, this road’s gotta be able to handle an Alaska freeze and then the thaw. But I tell you, when it’s finished, when it’s on the map, you can say, ‘we did that.’”

Here, beer is either the fuel that makes road construction possible or, once again, its reward. Alaska residents are likelier than non-residents to know there has been a road “hook up” to the Lower 48 since World War II.

Advertisement

Lastly, there is a 1987 Old Milwaukee commercial shot at Glacier Bay. “Glacier Bay, Alaska, and Old Milwaukee both mean something great to these guys. Glacier Bay means the one and only Alaskan king crab — sweet, fresh, and big. And Old Milwaukee means a great beer.” As the commercial further notes, “There’s nothing like the flavor of a special place and Old Milwaukee beer.

Outside viewers saw what they were meant to see, rugged men laboring to exhaustion before enjoying a cold beer to cap off the day. “Hey guys, it doesn’t get any better than this,” says one of the crabbers. The mountains and snow in the background provided the perfect background. These are “real men” in a “real place,” a perfected masculine form unencumbered by the frantic nature of cities, in a pure environment visibly free of pollution. And by affiliation, Old Milwaukee is understood as a decidedly authentic and pure beverage.

Any Alaskans watching the same commercial might have a different take on the display. Alaskans might scoff at the crabber working in a pristine, white cable knit sweater or the king crab pulled from a dungy pot. The full spread of a meal — with side dishes — eaten at the dock is a similarly odd visual. Needless to say, no Alaskan was convinced to switch to Old Milwaukee because of this commercial.

Commercial beer brewing in Alaska dates back to 1874, when Levi, Cohen, Fuller & Co. began service in Sitka, no matter that their entire operation was, strictly speaking, illegal. In the 150 years since, beer has been a constant presence in Alaska, again no matter any prohibitions. From 1874 Sitka through the Prinz Brau debacle to Alaskan Brewing to the rapid expansion of craft breweries, Alaskans have increasingly made their own beer, a solution for an industry largely ignorant of what actually makes Alaska unique.

Advertisement

Key sources:

“The Creamy Brew.” [Skagway] Daily Alaskan, April 23, 1902, 2.

“Did Not Buy Plant.” [Skagway] Daily Alaskan, May 3, 1901, 1.

Hellman, Matilda, Anu Katainen, and Janne Seppanen. “Gendered Citizen Constructs in Beer Commercials as Metatext of Alcohol Control Policies.” Contemporary Drug Problems 45, no. 2 (2018): 163-176.

Howell, Bill. Alaska Beer: Liquid Gold in the Land of the Midnight Sun. Charleston, SC: American Palate, 2015.

Advertisement

Ockerman, Megan Elisabeth. “‘It’s the Water’: A History of the Olympia Brewing Company, 1896-1983.” Master’s thesis, Washington State University, 2017.

Postman, Neil. Myths, Men, & Beer: An Analysis of Beer Commercials on Broadcast Television, 1987. Falls Church, VA: AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 1987.

Spude, Catherine Holder. The Mascot Saloon: Archeological Investigations in Skagway, Alaska, Volume 10. Anchorage: United States Government Printing Office, Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 2005.





Source link

Advertisement

Alaska

Palmer high school robotics team makes Alaska history with regional win

Published

on

Palmer high school robotics team makes Alaska history with regional win


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Palmer’s Colony High School Northern Knights Robotics won the First Robotics Competition (FRC) regional championship on April 4, becoming the first team from Alaska to win the title.

The Northern Knights’ business manager, sophomore Carter Fickes, said that the FRC is one of the most prestigious robotics competitions in the world.

“The game elements are a lot bigger,” he said.

“There’s a lot of more coding challenges as well, because you have what is called an autonomous period where your robot’s running strictly on code, and then you have a teleop period where it’s driver controlled.”

Advertisement

According to Fickes, the regional competition in Minneapolis saw the team paired with and against groups from Minnesota, Illinois, the Czech Republic, Japan, and China.

Teams were required to make “alliances” with each other, before competing together in the quarterfinals.

“Being collaborative with other teams and being open to their strategy is great.” he said.

“We were telling them our main marketing strategy was ‘we’re flexible, and if you want us to do something, we can do it.’”

Fickes told Alaska’s News Source that the competition required teams to program and direct their robots to shoot balls towards targets in order to score points.

Advertisement

The Northern Knights programmed their 85-pound robot to focus on defense, blocking shots from the opposing team.

“Our alliance partners had semi-automatic turrets that could shoot like hundreds of balls in a minute,” he said.

“We were blocking the other robots from getting on the other side and scoring fuel.”

Fickes said this was the first year that their team was selected to be a part of an alliance.

After the quarterfinals, the Northern Knights went on to dominate the rest of the competition.

Advertisement

“We were untouched,” he said.

“We were outscoring them by 200 points, and then the finals matches, I think it ended up being like 400 to 200 or 300.”

By winning both the finals match, as well as the Rookie Team of the Year award, the Northern Knights earned themselves a ticket to the FRC Worlds Competition in Texas beginning on April 29.

“Our mentality is kind of like, ‘we’ve made it this far, so why not try our best?’” he said.

“If we don’t win the whole competition, it’s not the end of the world. A team from Alaska has never done this before, and if we like our goal is to win and to qualify and do good.”

Advertisement

Unlike many other robotics teams across the country, Ficker said the Northern Knights are entirely funded through private donations.

“We built our robot in our team captain’s basement. He let us use his house, and we spent hours upon hours upon hours in his basement building and testing.”

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Money pours into Alaska race as Democrats seek Senate majority

Published

on

Money pours into Alaska race as Democrats seek Senate majority


A U.S. Senate race in Alaska is turning into one of the most expensive in the state’s history as a Democrat tries to flip a seat held by two-term incumbent Republican Dan Sullivan.

The fundraising bonanza comes as the odds of Democrats taking control of the Senate in this year’s midterm elections appear to be improving, according to political analysts.

Democrat Mary Peltola, who held Alaska’s sole House seat from 2022 to 2025, raised almost $9 million in the first quarter of 2026, Politico reported. It’s the largest first-quarter stockpile in Alaska political history, according to her campaign. 

“I’m so grateful for the support we’ve received from every single borough and census area across our state, and it’s that support that will bring us to victory this November,” Peltola said. 

Advertisement

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

GOP incumbent also has millions

Sullivan, who’s seeking a third term, brought in $2.1 million in the first quarter and has $7.5 million of cash on hand, Politico reported.

“This historic support sends a clear message: Alaskans know that Dan delivers,” Sullivan campaign spokesperson Nate Adams said in a statement.

Advertisement

In 2020, Democrat Al Gross outspent Sullivan but still lost by 13 points.

Alaska is a heavily Republican state. President Donald Trump carried the state by 10 to 15 points in each of the last three elections. 

However, Democrats are optimistic about a recent poll from Alaska Survey Research. The survey showed Peltola with a positive rating of 48.5%, compared to Sullivan’s 40.7%.

Dozens of US Senate seats in play

Thirty-five U.S. Senate seats are up for grabs in November, with Republicans defending 22 and Democrats, 13. 

With the GOP holding a current majority of 53-47, Democrats need to flip four seats to take control of the upper chamber for the remaining two years of Trump’s second term.

The Cook Political Report reported Monday that “the Senate battlefield is shifting in Democrats’ favor.” However, securing the magic number of 51 is still a “tall order.” 

Cook rates the Peltola-Sullivan race as “leans Republican.” Eighteen other races are currently rated as either “likely Republican” or “solid Republican.” 

Advertisement

The nonpartisan newsletter shows three races in the “leans Democrat” category. One other is “likely Democrat,” and nine are listed as “solid Democrat.” 

With Election Day more than six months away, three races — in Maine, Michigan and Ohio — are listed as toss-ups.

National Democrats see Peltola as a key to winning a majority in the Senate.

Politico said super PACs supporting Democrats have already spent more than $3 million in ad buys in Alaska, while the Republican’s Senate Leadership Fund has indicated it intends to spend $15 million on the race for Sullivan.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Hawaii Travelers Lost A Useful Lounge Perk. Is Alaska Bringing It Back For A Price?

Published

on

Hawaii Travelers Lost A Useful Lounge Perk. Is Alaska Bringing It Back For A Price?


Hawaii travelers lost one airport perk that still felt useful when Priority Pass access ended at Honolulu’s Plumeria Lounge last year. Now Alaska has reopened Priority Pass access at its San Francisco lounge, but only with a $15 co-pay, a requirement to be flying Alaska, Hawaiian, or a partner airline, and a four-hour limit.

Priority Pass access to Plumeria ended on April 1, 2025, during the Hawaiian-Alaska integration into Atmos Rewards. BOH covered that change when Priority Pass cardholders lost access to Honolulu’s Plumeria Lounge. Travelers using cards like AmEx Platinum and Chase Sapphire Reserve lost access to the better Honolulu lounge tied to those memberships, and when Priority Pass later returned at HNL, it was through a different lounge.

Hawaii travelers lost the best lounge.

When Plumeria dropped out of Priority Pass, cardholders lost a lounge with some real value at Honolulu. It offered a quieter place to sit upstairs, a better break from the terminal, and a more useful airport benefit than many card-linked options in Hawaii. Once that access ended, the lounge became less crowded for the smaller group still allowed in because other travelers had been shut out.

Our own Plumeria lounge review after the change showed exactly that. The room felt calmer and less packed, not because the lounge improved, but because fewer travelers were allowed through the door after Priority Pass access ended.

Advertisement

San Francisco is important to Hawaii travelers because it is one of the main gateways for Hawaii flights and a common connection point. Many Hawaii itineraries already run through SFO, which makes a $15 co-pay there directly relevant to Hawaii travel.

Alaska reopened Priority Pass at SFO, but now there’s a fee.

Travelers with a qualifying card and Priority Pass membership can still use Alaska’s SFO lounge, but now they must also pay $15, fly Alaska, Hawaiian, or a partner airline, and enter the lounge within four hours of departure. The lounge still participates in Priority Pass, but the value of that participation changes once travelers pay extra at the door.

The card issuer can still advertise lounge access, and the airline can still say the lounge is in the network, but the traveler who already pays a high annual fee now has to decide whether the benefit is worth paying for again.

This is showing up elsewhere, too.

The SFO move is not standing alone in such changes. The Virgin Atlantic Clubhouse at LAX returned to Priority Pass with a $35 co-pay. The airports and lounges are different, but the result is still familiar. The benefit remains in the network, but travelers pay extra to use it.

People keep cards like the AmEx Platinum and the Chase Sapphire Reserve in part because lounge access helps justify their high annual fees. When that access weakens or is only partially paid on arrival, the value declines while the annual fee remains unchanged.

Advertisement
Premier Club Lounge – a step down from Plumeria.

Honolulu got Priority Pass back, but only at the Premier Club.

Priority Pass did return to Honolulu, but not through Plumeria. It came back through the Premier Club in Terminal 1. So Hawaii did get lounge access back in a technical sense, but travelers did not have the old benefit restored; instead, they got a lower-tier substitute in a different room.

BOH already covered the massive Hawaiian-Alaska lounge upgrade planned for Honolulu, including the new Mauka Concourse lounge expected by late 2027. That future space is supposed to serve both airlines and be about five times larger than Plumeria, which makes the current HNL setup look transitional. But for travelers flying now, they are still dealing with the downgraded version instead of the larger shared lounge being promised for later.

Hawaii travelers have a reason to ask where this is headed.

SFO may be a one-off situation, and Honolulu may keep its current setup for now. But Hawaii travelers have already watched this benefit get reduced once. First, Plumeria disappeared from Priority Pass. Then, Premier Club became the replacement. Now, Alaska has shown at SFO that access can return with a fee attached. So this is a work in process.

Lead Photo of Plumeria Lounge at HNL. All photos © Beat of Hawaii.

Get Breaking Hawaii Travel News

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending