Connect with us

Alaska

Alaska Army Guardsman deploying to New Mexico to aid in border security

Published

on

Alaska Army Guardsman deploying to New Mexico to aid in border security


JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska Army National Guardsman will soon head down to the Lower 48 as part of the federal Southwest Border Mission to support U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The nearly 12-month deployment will bring 20 Alaska-based soldiers and two UH-72A Lakota helicopters to New Mexico. Among the guardsmen are air crews, maintenance technicians, and additional support personnel.

On Monday, a deployment ceremony brought the deployed soldiers’ friends and family to the Alaska National Guard Joint Force Headquarters to celebrate a traditional Army sendoff.

For some of the guardsmen, like Spc. Derek Ruckle — an aircraft maintainer who joined the guard three years ago — this will be their first deployment.

Advertisement

“There’s definitely some nerves, but it’s equal part nerves and excitement,” Ruckle said. “There’s a lot of opportunities for career growth, as well as just experiencing somewhere new.”

The unit of soldiers — known as Detachment 2, C Company, 3-140th Security and Support Battalion — was formed after the Army National Guard received initial notification to prepare for the mission in January.

It’s the second deployment for Sgt. Marvin Caparas, who previously served overseas in Kuwait, Iraq and Jordan. He’ll miss his wife and three kids but feels this deployment will be less challenging, logistically, to keep in contact with them.

“I feel a bit at ease, because I’m still kind of close to them and still within the U.S.,” Caparas said.

Caparas will serve as an aviation fueler during the nearly year-long mission. He’ll be serving alongside several members of the unit who were also on his previous deployment.

Advertisement

The deployment is a first for Spc. Hannah Kinder, a crew chief and maintainer who joined the National Guard just over two years ago. She’s looking forward to the opportunity to work in a new environment alongside her brother, who is also deploying.

“I’m excited for it,” Kinder said. “We’ve both been working side-by-side together, and we both volunteered for this deployment, and I’m excited to go down with him as well.”

Kinder started her career working on Black Hawk helicopters but transitioned her training to the Lakotas over the last five months in preparation for the deployment.

She said the months-long training as also given the chance to bond and learn how to work cohesively together.

The unit will team up with guardsmen from other states to provide aviation support to enhance the mission of the Customs Border Protection’s security operations.

Advertisement

The Detachment’s Commander, Capt. Kyle Johnson, said despite this being his first deployment since joining the National Guard in 2009 — joining Alaska, specifically, in 2021 after serving for over a decade in the Minnesota National Guard — he’s not nervous to lead the unit.

“I probably should be nervous, right? But we have such a good, formidable team that we’ve set up here, I’m honestly not — I think that we’re ready for whatever we need to do,” Johnson said. “I’m really, really confident in our team.”

The crew removed the blades on the two Lakotas and loaded the helicopters onto an Alaska Air National Guard C-17 Globemaster III for transport.

The soldiers are anticipating to leave for the deployment on Friday.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Alaska Airlines Adds New Routes from Anchorage and Portland

Published

on

Alaska Airlines Adds New Routes from Anchorage and Portland


Alaska Airlines (AS) announced a significant expansion of its summer 2025 network, introducing the first-ever nonstop flights connecting Anchorage to Detroit and Sacramento while reinstating service between Fairbanks and Portland.



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska’s congressional delegation reacts to Biden’s planned ban on offshore drilling

Published

on

Alaska’s congressional delegation reacts to Biden’s planned ban on offshore drilling


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Alaska’s congressional delegation is responding on Monday — some members more vocally than others — to the White House’s announcement that President Joe Biden will ban new offshore oil and gas drilling along most of the U.S. coastline.

This order will protect approximately 625 million acres of ocean along America’s Atlantic and Pacific coasts, the Gulf of Mexico, and Alaska’s Bering Sea, citing environmental risks as one of the main reasons for the decision.

In a statement, President Biden, whose term expires in two weeks, said he is using authority under the federal Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, which gives the president power to withdraw unleased lands from the outer continental shelf indefinitely.

Furthermore, he said that during his term, his administration has conserved more than 670 million acres of America’s lands and waters —more than any other president in history.

Advertisement

“Our country’s remarkable conservation and restoration progress has been locally led by Tribes, farmers and ranchers, fishermen, small businesses, and outdoor recreation enthusiasts across the country. Together, our ‘America the Beautiful’ initiative put the United States on track to meet my ambitious goal to conserve at least 30 percent of our Nation’s lands and waters by 2030,” President Biden said in a statement.

Reacting to the news on social media, newly sworn-in Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, hit the ground running, calling the President a “son of a bitch” in a social media post on “X”.

Begich continued in the post saying, “Events like this should serve as a constant reminder that the Democratic machine is more than willing to sacrifice us all for their sanctimonious, socialist-driven climate science.”

Speaking to Alaska’s News Source on Monday, Begich said sometimes, in Congress, you have to “shout to be heard.”

“I’m sorry that we had to say what we did, but I’m not sorry that we did it, and I will continue to be a strong voice for Alaska while I’m in Congress,” Begich said.

Advertisement

The Biden Administration stated that the withdrawal will safeguard 44 million acres of the Northern Bering Sea, located in far northwest Alaska. The Alaskan congressional delegation has previously opposed proposals to permit oil and gas leasing and drilling in this region.

Opposing what he describes as a last-minute move by the Biden Administration, Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, stated on Monday that he has never advocated for resource development in the Bering Sea area, as there is limited resource potential in that region.

Sullivan’s frustration lies in the unilateral process that the Biden Administration aims to use to make such a broad, sweeping move. Furthermore, Sullivan says the administration did not consult Alaska’s congressional delegation before announcing it.

“We’ve had 68 executive orders and executive actions singularly focused on Alaska by the Biden-Harris Administration. They did not consult with us on probably even one of them,” Sullivan said. “It’s no exaggeration to say this administration has sanctioned Alaskans and our energy industry more than he sanctioned the terrorist regimes in Iran and Venezuela.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, echoed Sullivan in a statement released Monday saying she understands the Biden Administration is trying to establish its “environmental legacy” before leaving office, but she believes the “11th-hour” move is the wrong approach.

Advertisement

She went on to say she agrees not all offshore areas need to be available for development and understands the desire of Alaska Tribes in the region to prevent any oil and gas development in nearby waters.

Her frustrations, like Sullivan’s, are broader.

“Cook Inlet is a good example: instead of working with Alaskans to prevent looming energy shortages in Southcentral, the administration has actively worked against our ability to produce more natural gas from that basin. What we have faced over the past four years is an unbalanced policy that has left us on the verge of importing LNG,” Murkowski said.

Speaking to the Biden Administration’s concerns about man-made catastrophes, such as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill that took the lives of eleven people and released millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, Begich acknowledged that the fishing industry is vital to Alaska.

However, he emphasized the importance of examining Alaska’s track record concerning these issues.

Advertisement

“We have the highest environmental standards in Alaska, as of any jurisdiction in the world. When you shut down areas like Alaska, you’re just pushing that work to a jurisdiction with lower environmental standards and a worse record,” Begich said.

When asked about what Alaska’s congressional delegation is doing in light of a new administration that touts the unleashing of Alaska’s national resource potential, Sullivan said he has a meeting scheduled with North Dakota Governor (Doug) Burgum on Tuesday. Burgum has been nominated by President-elect Trump as the new Secretary of the Interior and as the chairman of the newly formed National Energy Council.

“What we’re working on with them is to look at ways in which we can reverse many of these executive orders, either through a Trump Administration executive order or through legislation,” Sullivan said.

He stated the delegation is examining what is known as budget reconciliation provisions.

“We’re going to try and get passed in the law that focus on unleashing American energy. And when you unleash American energy, you have to unleash Alaska,” Sullivan said.

Advertisement

Begich added that unraveling the Biden Administration’s latest order using provisions under the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act could be difficult and may require an act of Congress.

“The Act that President Biden has invoked has some very specific language that may be challenging to repeal when President Trump takes office,” Begich said.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska’s snow crab season is back after 2-year pause, but battered industry faces uncertainty

Published

on

Alaska’s snow crab season is back after 2-year pause, but battered industry faces uncertainty


For two years in a row, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game canceled the snow crab season in the Bering Sea after biologists discovered an estimated 10 billion crabs had mysteriously disappeared — a 90% plunge in the population.

Now, fishermen are once again allowed to catch snow crabs — but they’re facing uncertainty as the species has only rebounded to a small fraction of what it once was. Meanwhile, some are still dealing with the consequences of the two-year pause.

“It’s been extremely difficult,” said commercial fisherman Gabriel Prout, who’s based on Kodiak Island. “There’s not a lot you can do. These boats are specifically designed to go out and catch crab, so we’re over $4 million in debt.”

Biologists blamed the rapid decline of snow crab on a 2018 climate-fueled heatwave. This “warming event” was initially thought of as a rare “lightning strike,” explained research biologist Ben Daly, but the “concern moving forward is that the predictions are suggesting higher frequency of lightning strikes in the future.”

Advertisement

Daly is now developing tracking devices to monitor snow crabs and identify healthy populations for sustainable harvesting.

“It helps us understand their movement patterns in response to environmental changes,” Daly said.

And it’s not just snow crabs that have been affected by warming waters. Other Alaskan species, like Pacific cod, king salmon and pollock have also experienced population decline. Between 2022 and 2023, Alaska’s seafood industry suffered a nearly $2 billion loss, according to NOAA. 

That industry extends to fish markets and dinner tables thousands of miles from Alaska. In some places, prices of Alaskan seafood have shot up nearly 60% in just a few years, according to Expana, which monitors pricing across the seafood industry.

“What the customer has to be aware of, more of what you’ll be eating will be imported, more of what you’ll be eating will be less regulated, more of what you’ll be eating will be caught with destructive fishing gear,” said Kenny Belov, who owns a seafood company and restaurant in California’s Bay Area.

Advertisement

In Kodiak, commercial fishing pots have returned to the water this season after officials lifted the two-year ban. The moratorium helped populations, but the quota will only be about a tenth of what it was three seasons ago.

“It’s hard to even consider a plan B when fishing is in my blood. I’m a third-generation fisherman,” Prout said.

For now, it’s a modest lifeline for fishermen who find themselves drifting deeper into the unknown.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending