Connect with us

Alaska

Airfare wars start with no notice. But staying informed helps a savvy traveler find the best deals.

Published

on

Airfare wars start with no notice. But staying informed helps a savvy traveler find the best deals.


Last week I was staying up late and getting up early to review the latest versions of on-again, off-again fare skirmishes both in Europe and between Anchorage, Hawaii and the West Coast.

Just to be clear: Airlines don’t run ads or issue news releases announcing that fares are going down or popping right back up. But if you happen to be planning a trip in the midst of a fare war, you could score a really good deal. Last Tuesday and Wednesday, some travelers scored tickets to Hawaii on Delta for $128 each way. Anchorage-Portland tickets were available for $108 one-way, before popping back up on Thursday.

At the same time, a big discount wave washed over Europe. Delta and United were the major players, with basic economy fares as low as $456 round-trip between Anchorage or Fairbanks and Barcelona.

Those fares to Europe all have popped back up to the $600 range for round-trip tickets. That’s not a bad price for fall or winter travel to Europe, but I’m quite confident the rates will drop again.

Advertisement

All of the great rates I found were basic economy fares. Travelers buying the cheapest fares board last, which means there’s no overhead bin space. They receive less credit toward their frequent flyer plan and cannot choose their seats in advance. The budget travelers are also last in line for any upgrades, too.

So, the challenge for mileage hounds and upgrade-seekers is how much extra airlines will charge for those add-ons: advance seat assignments, full mileage credit and a decent shot at an upgrade.

[US proposal would bar airline fees for parents to sit beside kids on flights]

When the basic economy fares first were introduced, the upcharge was about $30 each way for most destinations. Between Anchorage and Seattle, Delta still charges $30 more for the main cabin fares, while Alaska Airlines charges $35 each way.

For Saver travelers, Alaska Air awards 30% of the actual miles flown toward a traveler’s Mileage Plan account. Delta doesn’t allow any SkyMiles credit for basic economy flyers.

Advertisement

South of Seattle, the spread between the basic and main cabin increases. Between Anchorage and Honolulu, Alaska Air charges $55 one-way for an upcharge to a main cabin fare on its nonstop flight. Delta charges $50.

Travelers headed to Chicago can fly nonstop from Anchorage on Alaska or United. American also flies each day — but their flights are more expensive. I don’t know why. Both Alaska and United charge $40 each way for an upcharge to the main cabin.

United’s basic economy is particularly onerous regarding carry-on luggage. Unless you pay the upcharge, you’re not allowed to bring aboard a standard-size rolling suitcase to stuff in the overhead bin. If you get to the gate and the agent busts you for trying to smuggle on your suitcase, there’s an extra $25 penalty in addition to the bag fee.

Between Anchorage and Washington, D.C., Alaska Airlines charges between $50 and $84 each way for the upcharge to main. United charges between $50 and $74 each way. Delta charges between $30 and $65 each way.

If you’re traveling within Alaska on Alaska Airlines, all the economy seats are main cabin seats. Further, travelers can check up to three bags at no additional cost.

Advertisement

Both Alaska Airlines and Delta Air passengers can check two bags at no additional charge when traveling to or from Alaska and the Lower 48 or Hawaii. Delta travelers who reside in Alaska must belong to the airline’s SkyMiles loyalty plan. Alaska Air travelers must belong to its Club 49 plan for residents.

Travelers to Europe face a different equation when it comes to the difference between basic economy and the main cabin. The upcharge to main cabin also includes a checked bag.

If you’re flying to Paris, the cheapest fare on Delta in mid-October is $591 round-trip. A checked bag will cost you an additional $150. If you choose to pay $210 more, you can pick your seat in advance and get your first checked bag at no additional cost.

United offers the same package, for a little less: $200. American also charges $200 more and includes a pre-assigned seat and one checked bag (up to 23 kilograms).

Travelers to Asia have a few more twists in the equation. Flying to Singapore, United Airlines has a great fare of $798 round-trip. There’s just one stop in San Francisco on the outbound date I checked (Aug. 29). Even a basic economy ticket includes one checked bag. An upcharge to the main cabin for $160 round-trip includes the fee for a second checked bag.

Advertisement

By the way, United’s return flight from Singapore goes through San Francisco and Denver. It makes for a 30-hour travel day.

Traveling from Anchorage to Tokyo on Delta, the cost for basic economy is $1,552 round-trip. That price includes a free checked bag. The upcharge to main is $260. Once you’ve got your credit card out, though, Delta is likely to tempt you with an upgrade to Comfort+ for an additional $360. That’s a total of $2,172, or $620 more than the basic economy rate. The biggest benefit with Comfort+ is a few inches of extra legroom.

Depending on the airline, travelers to Asia may be able to choose a seat in advance and pay for it even if they’re traveling on a basic economy ticket.

[With seat sizes and passenger priorities changing, the cheapest ticket isn’t always the best]

There are different terms and conditions for traveling to different continents, including South America and Africa. The take-home message is this: The advertised price probably is not what you’re going to pay when you check out. In addition to basic vs. main, there may be additional fees for preferred seating, for any food you pre-order or if you want to pay for priority boarding or to go to a lounge before your flight.

Advertisement

For travelers who compare airlines before making a decision, these additional fees and options make the job harder. A travel agent can advise you on the best options for a flight, including whether or not you’re likely to make a tight connection in … say … Seattle. But the agent will charge an additional fee. Even so, if booking travel is not your core competence, an agent’s counsel could save you a lot of money and aggravation.

It can be confusing to keep track of what airline offers this or that. But it’s worth it to be aware that the optional fees will boost the cost of your next trip.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alaska

Fatal vehicle collision left one dead, two injured at mile 91 of Seward Highway, APD says

Published

on

Fatal vehicle collision left one dead, two injured at mile 91 of Seward Highway, APD says


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – On Thursday, a vehicle collision at mile 91 of the Seward Highway left one dead and two injured, according to an update from APD.

The collision involved two vehicles — a semi-truck and a passenger vehicle.

The Girdwood Fire Department responded at about 8:41 p.m. and pronounced the male driver of the vehicle dead at the scene.

APD says a male and female were transported to the hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

Advertisement

At the time of publication, the southbound and northbound lanes of the Seward Highway remain closed.

APD is currently investigating the circumstances of the collision and the victim’s identity will be released once they have completed next-of-kin procedures.

Original Story: An incident involving two vehicles at mile 91 of Seward Highway leaves two injured, according to Anchorage Police Department (APD).

APD is responding to the scene and travelers should expect closures at mile 91 for both northbound and southbound lanes of the Seward Highway for at least the next 3 to 4 hours.

Updates will be made as they become available.

Advertisement

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center

Published

on

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center


ANCHORAGE, Alaska (KTUU) – Strong winds in the Portage area on Monday destroyed a shelter building at the Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center that was used to house Sitka deer. The conservation center says 80 mph winds swept through Portage Valley.

The conservation center says no animals were injured, but they are quickly raising money to rebuild. Their goal is $30,000, and as of Thursday morning, they have already fundraised over $26,000.

Sales & Marketing Director Nicole Geils said, “The shelter was in their habitat. It was essential for providing them a safe Haven during harsh weather. It’s a really useful area for when we’re feeding and doing enrichment with the deer and it’s also a safe space for recovery after medical procedures when needed.”

Executive Director Sarah Howard described how she learned about the damage.

Advertisement

“We had a staff member that radioed, ‘The shelter’s gone!’ And a couple of us were at least able to make a little light of the situation. Like, did it go to Oz? And thankfully, it didn’t go too far, and the deer were okay,” Howard said.

The conservation center is still accepting donations through their website.

Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center(Courtesy Nicole Geils)
Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center
Strong winds destroy deer shelter at Alaska Wildlife Conservation Center(Courtesy Nicole Geils)

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money

Published

on

After school funding dispute, 4 Alaska districts move on without federally promised money


Until last month, the U.S. Department of Education said Alaska underfunded four of its largest school districts by $17.5 million. As a result of a recent agreement, the schools in Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau and Kenai Peninsula Borough won’t directly receive any of that money.

However, two of the districts said they weren’t counting on receiving the money as they planned their current budgets, while the other districts either didn’t respond or declined to comment.

The $17.5 million is part of COVID-era pandemic funding, and until last month, how Alaska distributed that funding was at the heart of a years-long dispute between federal and state officials, and whether it was spent fairly.

The state repeatedly defended their school spending plan, while the federal government asserted the state failed to comply with guidelines and reduced spending on these districts with high-need or high-poverty areas, and withheld the sum they said was owed.

Advertisement

Federal officials said the state reduced spending to the Kenai Peninsula and Anchorage school districts by up to $11.89 million in the 2021 to 2022 school year, and all four districts by $5.56 million the following year.

Kenai Superintendent Clayton Holland said the district never budgeted for this particular federal COVID funding, as they were aware of the dispute.

“Had it gone through, we would have welcomed it, as we are facing a potential deficit of $17 million for next year” and have nearly exhausted the balance of funding the district can spend without restrictions, Holland said.

Anchorage School District officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The dispute came to an end on Dec. 20,  when the federal department told the state it was releasing the funding, citing a review of the state’s one-time funding boosts in the last two budgets, and considered the matter closed.

Advertisement

Alaska Education Commissioner Deena Bishop led the state’s defense effort, including appealing the penalty, and applauded the move by the federal Department of Education. She said the state always followed the state law governing school funding.

“The department said, ‘We don’t agree with your formula, you should have given these guys more.’ And we said, ‘No, no, no. Only our Legislature can make the law about our formula. That’s why we stood behind it,” she said in an interview Tuesday.

The dispute centered around what was known as a “maintenance of equity” provision of a federal COVID aid law, which banned states from dropping per-pupil spending during the pandemic. Bishop said that decreases in funding in the four districts were due to drops in enrollment, according to the state’s spending formula.

Bishop defended the formula as equitable, noting that it factors in geographic area, local tax bases, and other issues. “I just felt strongly that there’s no way that they can say that we’re inequitable, because there are third-party assessments and research that has been done that Alaska actually has one of the most equitable formulas,” she said.

“Our funding formula is a state entity. Our districts are funded according to that,” Bishop said. “And so basically, they [U.S. Department of Education] argued that the distribution of funds from the state funding formula, the state’s own money, right, nothing to do with the Feds, was inequitable.

Advertisement

“So they picked these districts to say, ‘You need to give them more.’ And we’re saying, ‘No, you don’t have a right to say that. We spent your money, how you said, but only the state Legislature can say’” how to spend state money, she said.

She said the state felt confident about their spending plan for American Rescue Plan Act funding.

In addition to temporarily withholding the funding, the federal government further penalized Alaska by designating it a “high risk” grantee.

Federal and state officials went back and forth on compliance, with the state doubling down, defending their school spending. By May, the state had racked up another $1 million in frozen federal funds.

Bishop said despite the holds from the feds, they continued to award the funds to districts.

Advertisement

“We felt as though we would prevail. So we never wanted to harm school districts who were appropriated those funds the way that they were supposed to,” she said. School districts followed the dispute closely.

Juneau School District’ Superintendent Frank Hauser said the district did not expect or budget for the funds.

“JSD was slated only to receive approximately $90,000 of the “maintenance of equity” funds, much less than Kenai, Fairbanks, or Anchorage,” he said in an email. “JSD will not receive that money now; however, we had not anticipated receiving it and had not included it in our budget projection.”

The Fairbanks North Star Borough School District declined to comment on the issue. A spokesperson said the district administration is awaiting clarification from the state education department.

On Monday, the administration announced a recommended consolidation plan for five elementary schools to be closed, citing a $16 million deficit for next year. A final vote on whether to close the schools is set for early February.

Advertisement

Now the state is in the process of applying for reimbursements from the federal Department of Education, and expects to receive that full $17.5 million award, Bishop said. If districts have outstanding pandemic-related expenses, she said those can be submitted to the state, and will be reimbursed according to the state’s COVID-19 funding guidelines. “We’ll process that, and then we’ll go to the Feds and get that money back,” she said.

In December, Gov. Mike Dunleavy applauded the federal announcement, calling the dispute “a tremendous waste of time,” in a prepared statement. He repeated his support for President-elect Donald Trump’s calls to eliminate the U.S. Department of Education.

“On the bright side, this saga is a wonderful case study of the U.S. Department of Education’s abuse of power and serves as further evidence for why I support the concept of eliminating it,” he said.

Dunleavy linked to a social media post he made on X, which read, in part, that eliminating the department “would restore local control of education back to the states, reduce bureaucratic inefficiency and reduce cost. Long overdue.”

Sen. Löki Tobin, D-Anchorage and chair of the Senate Education Committee, pointed to the timing for the outgoing Biden administration and federal leaders’ desire to release funding to Alaska schools.

Advertisement

“It’s very clear that if the presidential election had ended in a different result, we would not be having this conversation,” she said. “Instead, they would be continuing to work with the department to find a more elegant, a more clean solution.”

She said the federal letter announcing the end to the long dispute doesn’t mean the issue of equity was resolved.

“I think their letter to the Department of Education and Early Development here in Alaska was very clear that Alaska never did fully comply with the guidelines, but instead, due to a want and a fervent hope that the resources would get into the schools and into the communities that so desperately needed them, that they would choose to not pursue further compliance measures,” she said.

Last year, the Legislature passed a budget with $11.89 million included for the state to comply with the federal requirements, but that funding was vetoed by Dunleavy, who defended the state’s position, saying the “need for funds is indeterminate.”

The budget did include a one-time funding boost to all districts, but Tobin said the annual school aid debate left districts in limbo for future budget planning.

Advertisement

“We can see how this has cost school districts, how it has created instability, how it has resulted in a system that is unpredictable for funding streams for our schools,” Tobin said.

Kenai Superintendent Holland expressed hope that school funding would be prioritized by elected officials this year.

“The bigger issue for us, and for all Alaskan school districts, is what our legislators and governor will decide regarding education funding in the upcoming legislative session,” Holland said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending