Having pumped billions of dollars into building the next generation of computer chip factories in the US, the Biden administration is facing new pressure over the health and safety risks those facilities could pose. Environmental reviews for the new projects need to be more thorough, advocates say. They lack transparency around what kinds of toxic substances factory workers might handle, and plans to keep hazardous waste like forever chemicals from leaching into the environment have been vague.
Technology
Valve bans Razer and Wooting’s new keyboard features in Counter-Strike 2
![Valve bans Razer and Wooting’s new keyboard features in Counter-Strike 2 Valve bans Razer and Wooting’s new keyboard features in Counter-Strike 2](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/2C3ej18irOgZR-G4mZsO2L8CD3I=/0x0:3840x2160/1200x628/filters:focal(1920x1080:1921x1081)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25580609/1329760.jpeg)
Valve is banning Counter-Strike 2 players from using keyboard features to automate perfect counter-strafes. Razer was the first keyboard maker to add a Simultaneous Opposing Cardinal Directions (SOCD) feature to its range of Huntsman V3 Pro keyboards last month, followed shortly by Wooting. Using Snap Tap as Razer calls it or Wooting’s Snappy Tappy will now get you kicked from Counter-Strike 2 games.
“Recently, some hardware features have blurred the line between manual input and automation, so we’ve decided to draw a clear line on what is or isn’t acceptable in Counter-Strike,” says Valve. “We are no longer going to allow automation (via scripting or hardware) that circumvent these core skills and, moving forward, (and initially—exclusively on Valve Official Servers) players suspected of automating multiple player actions from a single game input may be kicked from their match.”
I’ve tested using SOCD in Counter-Strike 2 this morning and can confirm you get removed from a game on Valve’s official servers, but there’s no account ban. Valve is banning the use of these keyboard features, but it doesn’t appear to be ready to ban accounts for using them right now.
Razer and Wooting’s SOCD features both let players automate switching strafe directions without having to learn the skill. Normally, to switch strafe directions in a first-person shooter, you have to fully release one key before pressing the other. If both are pressed, they cancel each other, and you stand there for a moment until you release one of the keys. SOCD means you don’t need to release a key and you can rapidly tap the A or D key to counter-strafe with little to no effort.
Some professional Counter-Strike 2 players had called for SOCD to be banned, much like how null binds that prevent you from pressing two opposing directions have been banned in tournaments for years.
Wooting reluctantly added a beta version of SOCD to its range of keyboards after Razer introduced the feature on its own hardware. “We are glad Valve has taken a stance against Snap Tap,” says Wooting in a post on X today. “Don’t use Snappy Tappy (SOCD) or Rappy Snappy in CS2 any more as it will result in a kick.”
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
Technology
The Acolyte has been canceled
![The Acolyte has been canceled The Acolyte has been canceled](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/4wzeNtcVYCjpngLy3GLMd93ZsFM=/0x0:3840x1598/1200x628/filters:focal(1920x799:1921x800)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25580254/PDX_FF_003610.jpg)
Though Disney Plus’ The Acolyte series introduced some very compelling new characters and lore to the Star Wars canon, its story about the dark side of the Force won’t be continuing with a second season.
Though its season one finale seemed to be setting up the series for more episodes, Deadline reports that Disney has canceled The Acolyte. Things were rocky from the start for the show as Star Wars fans displeased with its cast and premise took to review-bombing it in droves, but Disney’s cancellation decision was reportedly driven by The Acolyte’s less-than-desirable viewership numbers.
The news comes just a little over a year after Disney CEO Bob Iger told CNBC that reigning in spending on big budget Marvel and Star Wars projects could…
Continue reading…
Technology
Do we know enough about the health risks of new semiconductor factories?
![Do we know enough about the health risks of new semiconductor factories? Do we know enough about the health risks of new semiconductor factories?](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/vkykqQjGxL94j3Oagq-9VBqEiTA=/0x0:8679x5786/1200x628/filters:focal(3307x3208:3308x3209)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25578757/2092447526.jpg)
A coalition of influential labor unions and environmental groups, including the Sierra Club, have since submitted comments to the Department of Commerce on draft environmental assessments, saying that the assessments fall short. The coalition’s comments flag lists of potential issues at several projects in Arizona and Idaho, including how opaque the safety measures that manufacturers will take to protect both workers and nearby residents are.
“We aren’t objecting to the existence of these plants. We know that they’re going to have to use hazardous substances.”
The groups don’t want to stop the projects from moving forward, they say. Their aim is to make sure that the industry avoids missteps it made when the US used to make a lot more semiconductors. America’s first generation of semiconductor factories, or fabs, left Silicon Valley pockmarked with toxic Superfund sites that are still being cleaned up decades later. That’s why they say it’s crucial to assess the environmental risks now and give communities a chance to weigh in on new fabs springing up across the nation.
“We aren’t objecting to the existence of these plants. We know that they’re going to have to use hazardous substances. Obviously, we’re pushing for substitutes when they can, but one of our biggest problems is the lack of transparency,” says Lenny Siegel, executive director of the Center for Public Environmental Oversight (CPEO).
Federal dollars come with strings attached
Siegel is part of CHIPS Communities United, a coalition that has formed over the past year working to hold semiconductor manufacturers accountable to communities where they set up shop. The group is also spearheaded by some big-name unions including Communications Workers of America, United Auto Workers, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.
The coalition has formed at a pivotal time in the US. The CHIPS and Science Act, which passed in 2022, created $52.7 billion in funding for chip manufacturing. That’s supposed to help build up a domestic supply chain for computer chips in high demand for everything from cars and gaming to AI. As of June, more than half of that money had been distributed to eight companies building factories in 10 states. Private companies have committed an additional $395 billion to new semiconductor and electronics manufacturing in the US since 2021, according to the Biden administration.
If a company accepts federal funds, it can be subject to added environmental regulation on top of any local rules it has to follow at a construction site. A bedrock environmental policy in the US is the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires federal agencies to conduct environmental reviews of major projects and share its findings with the public.
If NEPA applies, the agency will initially put together a document called an environmental assessment to determine if there could be “significant” environmental effects. If it finds no significant impact, then the review process ends. But if it deems there to be significant risks, it has to prepare a more detailed environmental impact statement and open up the process for more public engagement.
“There’s no guarantee”
So far, the Department of Commerce has released draft environmental assessments for three specific project sites: Micron’s plans in Boise, Idaho, as well as Intel’s and TSMC’s facilities in Arizona. All three drafts generally describe potential environmental effects as minor or stipulate that there would be “no significant effects” — as long as there are controls in place. (The jargon they use is “best management practices,” or BMP.)
CHIPS Communities United isn’t convinced. It submitted comments to the Department of Commerce calling on it to craft a more robust environmental impact statement for each of the projects. One of the key things they’re calling out is that there isn’t enough transparency on what those best management practices are and how they’d be monitored or enforced.
“These are huge projects, and they will have an environmental impact. The draft environmental assessments make assumptions about what is going to be done to mitigate those impacts, but there’s no guarantee that those mitigations will be carried out,” Siegel says.
Computer chips have a toxic history
A longtime activist, Siegel also served as mayor of Mountain View, California, in 2018 — where chip factories contaminated soil and water sources before manufacturing started to move abroad. Santa Clara County, where Mountain View is located, has more Superfund sites than any other county in the US. Arsenic, chloroform, and lead are just a few of the many hazardous substances that leached into groundwater and are still being cleaned up at old manufacturing sites.
Today, manufacturers use an ever-evolving chemical cocktail when making computer chips. The industry has taken strides to prevent pollution and replace certain substances that have been linked to miscarriages and other health risks. But toxicologists say the chemical mix is often changing faster than it takes to suss out the potential dangers. To make things harder, companies generally don’t like to share what kinds of chemicals they’re using, protecting them as trade secrets despite pressure from advocates to notify workers of the substances they’re handling.
“We also want to see workers empowered in the facilities, not just to know what they’re working with, but to have a voice in health and safety protocols, to have the right to stop production if things are dangerous,” says Judith Barish, coalition director for CHIPS Communities United. “And we want to know that workers won’t be retaliated against if they speak out.”
Forever chemicals have become a bigger concern lately with chip manufacturing. That encompasses thousands of different kinds of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that were used for years to make all kinds of products, from fabrics to nonstick pans, more durable. The US is just starting to craft regulations for the most common kinds of PFAS now, but there are still thousands of other forever chemicals for which there are no mandated exposure limits. Scientists are still scrambling to understand how exposure affects the human body, but there’s already evidence that high exposure can increase the risk of certain kinds of cancer, liver damage, high cholesterol, and some reproductive health issues. The semiconductor industry has also created its own PFAS consortium to study the chemicals and minimize pollution.
How to get rid of forever chemicals is another area of active research since they earned their name by being particularly hard to destroy. It’s no surprise that CHIPS Communities United is worried about how new semiconductor fabs will handle hazardous waste, including PFAS. All three draft assessments conclude that hazardous materials on-site pose “no significant effects” — but only if those so-called best management practices take place.
CHIPS Communities United wants to know how exactly those practices would be implemented. When it comes to forever chemicals, the assessments for TSMC and Intel say that the companies will separate PFAS from other waste streams and send it to off-site disposal facilities. What happens once those chemicals are off-site still worries the coalition. PFAS has been known to leak from landfills and even persist in the air after being incinerated.
A more detailed environmental impact statement for each of the proposed projects can help fill in the gaps, they contend. It’ll also give nearby communities more opportunities to weigh in on what kinds of solutions they’d like to see. Beyond that, they’d also like to see manufacturers enter into legally binding community benefits agreements. They also say that the Commerce Department should stipulate specific environmental and health protections in contracts with companies.
Those kinds of agreements can go a long way in the absence of up-to-date regulations. New federal rules for PFAS focus on drinking water rather than wastewater. And most chemical exposure limits set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) haven’t been updated since the 1970s. OSHA says on its website that its exposure limits “are outdated and inadequate for ensuring protection of worker health.” Attempts to update them have repeatedly faced quick backlash from industry leaders and lawmakers with a deregulatory agenda.
Proposed rules for cutting down greenhouse gas emissions are similarly in peril after several Supreme Court rulings and the prospect of another Donald Trump presidency. The coalition is also concerned about how these new fabs will keep their climate pollution in check. How much water these facilities will use is another point of contention, especially in places like Arizona that grapple with worsening drought. The comments CHIPS Communities United sent to the Department of Commerce for plants being built by Intel, Micron, and TSMC cover a range of issues, including climate change and air quality, hazardous substances and waste, and the cumulative effects of building multiple manufacturing facilities near each other.
“In the absence of enforceable, transparent requirements to address such impacts, the applicant’s promise to address the impacts does not eliminate them,” the coalition’s responses to Micron and Intel projects say.
Intel declined to provide an on-the-record response to The Verge. It’s building two new chip factories and updating an existing fab at its Ocotillo campus in Chandler, Arizona. TSMC, which is building three new semiconductor fabs in Phoenix, didn’t respond to requests for comment. Micron is building a new 1.2-million-square-foot fab at its headquarters in Boise. In an email to The Verge, Micron said that questions regarding the draft environmental assessment should be directed to the CHIPS Program Office (CPO) within the Department of Commerce.
“We posted the draft [environmental assessments] for public comment to provide transparency and facilitate the public’s input in this process. CPO will carefully consider all public comments received during the comment period as we work to finalize the NEPA process,” CHIPS communications director, Geoff Burgan, said in a statement.
In other words, the Department of Commerce has to take all of these concerns into consideration as it finalizes its environmental reviews. That in itself is what makes federal review under NEPA a powerful tool. Last year, there was a failed attempt to exempt new chip factories from NEPA altogether.
“We believe that the people who work in the plants and live nearby have a right to know what they’re using,” Siegel says. So do others trying to figure out where to build a new home or childcare center, he adds. “People and planners need to have this information.”
Technology
New Russian threat targets over 100 Apple macOS browser extensions
![New Russian threat targets over 100 Apple macOS browser extensions New Russian threat targets over 100 Apple macOS browser extensions](https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/08/2-A-new-threat-targeting-over-100-macOS-browser-extensions-details.jpg)
Apple Macs are considered comparatively safer than Windows. This remains true, as in the past few months, we’ve noticed numerous malware and vulnerabilities affecting Windows laptops. However, a stealer malware has shown that Macs yet again aren’t completely immune to cyberattacks.
The malware, called Banshee, targets the extensions installed on your Mac in order to gain illegal access to your passwords, cryptocurrency and personal data. It affects a wide range of browsers, including Chrome and Safari.
GET SECURITY ALERTS, EXPERT TIPS – SIGN UP FOR KURT’S NEWSLETTER – THE CYBERGUY REPORT HERE
A woman working on her Mac laptop (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
What you need to know
Researchers at Elastic Security Labs found that Banshee, a malware developed by Russian hackers, works on macOS x86_64 and ARM64 systems. The malware is being sold as a service to other bad actors for just $3,000, which the researchers think is pretty cheap compared to other malware available on the dark web to criminals. Yes, believe it or not, there’s a whole market for this stuff.
Apple has a tight infrastructure that prevents bad actors from targeting its devices, but hackers always find loopholes. In this case, it’s the browser extensions you install, whether it’s an ad blocker or an Amazon price tracker.
Targeted browsers and extensions
“Banshee Stealer targets a wide range of browsers, cryptocurrency wallets, and around 100 browser extensions, making it a highly versatile and dangerous threat,” Elastic Security Labs said. The malware targets several web browsers and crypto wallets, including Safari, Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Brave, Microsoft Edge, Vivaldi, Yandex, Opera, OperaGX, Exodus, Electrum, Coinomi, Guarda, Wasabi Wallet, Atomic and Ledger.
Data theft capabilities
Once the malware gets into your Mac, it starts stealing your data. It can grab information about the system and passwords from the Keychain. It also pulls data from different file types stored on your desktop and in your documents. Plus, it’s got tricks to avoid detection, like figuring out if it’s in a virtual environment and using an API to steer clear of Macs where Russian is the primary language.
![New Russian threat targets over 100 Apple macOS browser extensions](https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/08/1200/675/2-A-new-threat-targeting-over-100-macOS-browser-extensions-details.jpg?ve=1&tl=1)
Illustration of a hacker working on a laptop (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
4.3 MILLION AMERICANS EXPOSED IN MASSIVE HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT DATA BREACH
How does the malware infect your computer?
The report from Elastic Security Labs didn’t go into detail about how the Banshee malware actually infects your computer. But it’s likely using the same tactics we’ve seen other Mac and Windows malware use before.
This usually involves sneaky methods like displaying fake pop-ups that mimic legitimate apps or services. Hackers often create a sense of urgency, pushing you to click on a link to “install an update” or “fix an issue” right away. Of course, instead of an update, that link installs the malware on your system.
It’s also unclear how widespread this malware is, which regions it’s targeting or the extent of the damage it’s caused so far. We reached out to Apple for a comment on this article but did not hear back before our deadline.
![New Russian threat targets over 100 Apple macOS browser extensions](https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/08/1200/675/3-A-new-threat-targeting-over-100-macOS-browser-extensions-outro.jpg?ve=1&tl=1)
A woman working on her laptop (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
MASSIVE SECURITY FLAW PUTS MOST POPULAR BROWSERS AT RISK ON MAC
4 ways to protect yourself from the Mac malware
While there’s no exact solution to prevent the Banshee malware, the following computer practices can help keep your Mac secure.
1) Limit and manage browser extensions: Be selective about the browser extensions you install. Only add extensions from well-known developers and those you truly need. Regularly review and manage your extensions to ensure they haven’t been compromised or are no longer necessary. Extensions with excessive permissions or that request access to sensitive data should be removed. Check out our top browser extensions to make life easier.
2) Be cautious with downloads and links: Only download software from reputable sources such as the Mac App Store or official websites of trusted developers. Be wary of unsolicited emails or messages prompting you to download or install updates, especially if they contain links. Phishing attempts often disguise themselves as legitimate update notifications or urgent messages.
The best way to protect yourself from clicking malicious links that install malware is to have strong antivirus protection installed on all your devices. Get my picks for the best 2024 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android and iOS devices.
3) Keep your software updated: Ensure that both macOS and all installed applications are up to date. Apple frequently releases security patches and updates that address vulnerabilities. Enable automatic updates for macOS and your apps to stay protected without having to manually check for updates. If you need more help, see my guide on keeping all your devices updated.
4) Use strong and unique passwords: To protect your Mac from malware, it’s also crucial to use strong, unique passwords for all your accounts and devices. Avoid reusing passwords across different sites or services. A password manager can be incredibly helpful here: It generates and stores complex passwords for you, making them difficult for hackers to crack.
It also keeps track of all your passwords in one place and automatically fills them in when you log into accounts, so you don’t have to remember them yourself. By reducing the number of passwords you need to recall, you’re less likely to reuse them, which lowers the risk of security breaches. Get more details about my best expert-reviewed password managers of 2024 here.
HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PRIVATE DATA FROM THE INTERNET
Kurt’s key takeaways
Macs, whether you’re using a MacBook or an iMac, are generally pretty secure, but they’re not completely foolproof. One weak spot has always been extensions, and that’s where the Banshee malware comes in. It exploits these vulnerabilities to swipe your important data and money. There aren’t any specific steps to deal with this exact threat, but sticking to good computing habits can help a lot. Make sure your downloads are from trusted sources, be cautious with unexpected email attachments and think carefully before installing anything.
What steps do you take to verify that downloads and extensions are from legitimate sources? Let us know by writing us at Cyberguy.com/Contact.
For more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading to Cyberguy.com/Newsletter.
Ask Kurt a question or let us know what stories you’d like us to cover.
Follow Kurt on his social channels:
Answers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:
Copyright 2024 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
-
Ohio6 days ago
Ohio taxpayers sent families $966 million for private school tuition: Capitol Letter
-
World1 week ago
What could an EU Commissioner do to tackle the housing crisis?
-
News7 days ago
Roger Stone says his email accounts were how the hackers got into the Trump campaign
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump legal cases in limbo after SCOTUS immunity ruling, freeing up schedule to campaign
-
Politics1 week ago
GOP states sue to stop Biden admin extending Obamacare to illegal immigrants
-
News1 week ago
Photos: Family of Michael Brown Jr. marches on Ferguson 10 years later
-
News1 week ago
Full Trump-Musk Interview: Assassination Bid, Iran-Israel, Russia-Ukraine, Kamala-Biden, US Election
-
News1 week ago
Cross-Tabs: August 2024 Times/Siena Poll of the Likely Electorate