Connect with us

Sports

Why has Bill Belichick’s hiring at UNC sparked skepticism? Let’s examine the reasons

Published

on

Why has Bill Belichick’s hiring at UNC sparked skepticism? Let’s examine the reasons

Bill Belichick has amassed 333 total coaching victories in the NFL, second only to the late Don Shula. He coached the New England Patriots to six Super Bowl victories and served as defensive coordinator on two Super Bowl-winning editions of the New York Giants. He possesses a genius-level knowledge of the NFL, not just in terms of X’s and O’s but also the A-B-C’s of the game’s rich history. And yet his pivot to college football — he was introduced Thursday as the new head coach at the University of North Carolina — has been met with varying degrees of skepticism, raised eyebrows and even outright hilarity.

Why, one may ask, is a coach who has accomplished so much being treated in such a negative light? Part of the problem is Belichick’s spectacularly stiff and grumpy public persona, but it’s much deeper than that. Let’s examine some of the reasons, real and imagined, why the mere mention of Belichick’s name inspires so many different reactions from people.

GO DEEPER

Feldman: No reason Belichick can’t have success at UNC. Just don’t expect him to last long

‘He never won anything without Tom Brady‘

It always begins here, does it not? Belichick is the greatest coach in football history if the accounting is limited to Super Bowl rings, but there’s always that nagging Tom Brady issue that raises two questions: 1) What has Belichick won without Brady, and 2) Has a Bradyless existence exposed Belichick’s inability to get the job done at this stage of his career?

Advertisement

Fact: Without getting too specific with the numbers, such as weaving in the games in which Jacoby Brissett and Jimmy Garoppolo were quarterbacking the Patriots in 2016 while Brady was sitting out his four-game “Deflategate” suspension, the big picture is that Belichick has won six Super Bowls with Brady as his quarterback and none without Brady as his quarterback.

Fact: Belichick didn’t win any Super Bowls during the five seasons he coached the original Cleveland Browns. He didn’t win one in his first year in New England when Brady was a rookie whose sole appearance was a Thanksgiving Day cameo against the Detroit Lions. He didn’t win one in the four post-Brady seasons in New England.

But at the risk of getting too lawyerly, what’s also true is that Belichick and Brady, as a coach-quarterback tandem, combined to win six Super Bowls. That’s an inconvenient truth to hardened Belichick bashers, but to remove it from the discussion is to assume Brady would have quarterbacked the Patriots to six Super Bowl victories regardless of the coach. Those types of alternate historical timelines are fun in the “Back to the Future” movies but don’t work here in the real world.

Cheating controversies

There’s really no getting around this one. In 2007, Belichick and the Patriots organization were disciplined by the NFL after it had been determined they videotaped signals by New York Jets defensive coaches during New England’s season-opening 38-14 victory at Giants Stadium.

Advertisement

The Patriots were fined $250,000 and lost their first-round pick in the 2008 draft. Belichick was fined $500,000. It was this “Spygate” scandal that resulted in Belichick being branded as “Beli-cheat,” a nickname his critics are happy to break out of mothballs whenever they’re in the mood.

Years later, the Patriots were embroiled in another cheating controversy when Brady was investigated for allegedly using underinflated footballs in New England’s 45-7 victory over the Indianapolis Colts in the 2014 AFC Championship Game. The NFL’s investigation, which dragged on in the courts for well over a year before Brady was finally suspended for the first four games of the 2016 season, was widely criticized as a colossal overreach by the NFL. And, anyway, Belichick was never implicated.

But Spygate often gets twinned up with Deflategate in any discussion of the Belichick era in New England, as is former San Diego Chargers running back LaDainian Tomlinson’s blistering 2007 observation that, “I think the Patriots actually live by the saying, ‘If you’re not cheatin’, you’re not trying.’ You keep hearing the different stories of people complaining about stuff that they do. So I’m not surprised.”

Spygate was a cheap stunt by Belichick that apparently didn’t yield much information. He deserves to wear this one. And not to pile on with Deflategate, but Belichick has long been cheered as the ultimate micromanager and a master of attending to every last teeny-weeny detail. If his supporters want to enter these talking points into the discussion, his critics should be granted license to say, “OK, then he should have known somebody was goofing with the footballs.”

The Kraftmatic Adjustable Storyline

Following the 2023 season, during which New England went 4-13, Belichick was fired by Patriots owner Robert Kraft, thus ending one of the greatest coaching runs in NFL history. Only it wasn’t portrayed as a “firing” by Kraft. Instead, it was presented as a “mutual parting of ways,” with the two men appearing together at a Gillette Stadium news conference and fumbling through one of the most awkward hugs in sports history.

Advertisement

“The man standing to my left brought the leadership and coaching skills that were needed to make the type of unprecedented success that we have had possible,” Kraft said that day. “Coach Belichick will forever be celebrated as a legendary sports icon here in New England and I believe go in as a Pro Football Hall of Famer on the first ballot. Why? Because he is the greatest coach of all time.”

Yet Kraft had less flattering things to say about his former coach in “The Dynasty,” the 10-part TV docuseries that aired in early 2024. Among them, Kraft used the occasion to dish that he called Belichick a “schmuck” in the aftermath of the Spygate scandal. The quote had been reported years earlier, but only by source; here now was Kraft speaking the word on camera and feeling quite comfortable doing so. It wasn’t like some off-camera interviewer lured Kraft into a trap.

Belichick didn’t come out of “The Dynasty” looking good. But it may have backfired on Kraft, who in 2024 was again denied his dream of being elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Meet the new coach, same as the very old coach

Belichick, who turns 73 on April 16, will be the oldest active coach in college football in 2025. But he was already being dismissed as too old and out of touch during his last few seasons in New England, at a time when the NFL was beginning to look to much younger coaches to run their teams. Sean McVay is a prime example: He was just 31 in his first season as head coach of the Los Angeles Rams in 2017, and 35 when he coached the ’21 Rams toward a 23-20 victory over the Cincinnati Bengals in Super Bowl LVI.

Mike Felger, the longtime afternoon drive host at Boston’s 98.5 The Sports Hub, often makes reference to “tight-pants coaches” — younger, well-built coaches who are steeped in analytics and are believed to have the sensibilities to relate with modern players. But to dismiss Belichick solely because of his age is to ignore a trend in the modern American workforce, says Debra Whitman, executive vice president and chief policy officer at AARP.

Advertisement

“The share of workers over age 75 is the only part of our (American) labor force that’s predicted to grow,” Whitman said. “People want to work, or they need to work — they either need the money or they love to work.” (In Belichick’s case, it’s the love of the work. He certainly doesn’t need the money.)

Whitman, author of “The Second Fifty: Answers to the 7 Big Questions of Midlife and Beyond,” believes there’s a “huge value to society in keeping people who have lots of experience and knowledge engaged.”

According to Whitman, research by the Organization of Economic Development and Cooperation has shown that a multi-generational workforce “actually makes a workplace more productive.”

go-deeper

GO DEEPER

What do top prospects and high school coaches think about the Bill Belichick hire?

They may not talk about it on ‘Inside the NFL,’ but he’s not popular inside the NFL

As reported by The Athletic’s Jeff Howe, one of the reasons Belichick hasn’t been offered a head-coaching job in the NFL since leaving the Patriots is, in the words of a high-ranking team executive, “(Belichick) burned a lot of bridges over his career.”

Advertisement

If so, it’s not just Spygate that ruffled feathers in the NFL. Cheating scandals happen all the time in professional sports, whereupon fines and suspensions are levied, but there are usually avenues for redemption. Consider what happened in MLB after manager A.J. Hinch and bench coach Alex Cora were suspended for a year following a sign-stealing scandal involving the 2017 Houston Astros. Hinch was later hired as manager of the Detroit Tigers. Cora, who had moved on to Boston and managed the Red Sox to a World Series championship in 2018, was fired by the club after the 2019 season, sat out 2020 and was rehired for 2021.

Bill Belichick isn’t exactly Joe College

The lede to a column by The Athletic’s Stewart Mandel on Belichick landing the UNC job minces no words: “Congratulations, North Carolina. You managed to hire someone completely unqualified to be your next football coach. You did that thing so many schools do where they try to win the press conference instead of win football games. It rarely works.”

Belichick has never coached college football at any level, under any title. Yes, his father, the late Steve Belichick, had a long and storied career as an assistant college coach, mostly at the United States Naval Academy. Yes, Belichick’s son, also named Steve, is the defensive coordinator at the University of Washington. And, yes, Bill Belichick made some visits to Washington practices last spring.

None of that adds up to actual college coaching experience, even if Belichick went to extraordinary lengths at his introductory news conference to make it appear this is where he’s wanted to be all along.

Advertisement

“I always wanted to coach in college football,” Belichick said. “It just never really worked out. I had some good years in the NFL, so that was OK. This is really kind of a dream come true.”

That’s a hard one to get behind, but we’ll play along. Can it work? We posed the question to former Patriots running back Kevin Faulk, who played under Belichick for 13 seasons, including three Super Bowl championship teams.

“Bill will figure it out,” Faulk said. “When he’s dealing with football, he’s all in.”

And yet even Faulk felt the need to wave a warning flag.

“The kids are not what they used to be,” Faulk said. “I feel like there’s some real difficulty he’s going to have to go through.”

Advertisement

Belichick hates the media

Make no mistake: Belichick has never enjoyed his sessions with the media, and over the years he developed a talent for sidestepping even basic questions. “We did what was best for the team,” he’d often say.

But it was never Belichick’s style to be bombastic or confrontational. He’d sometimes roll out a childish staredown when confronted with an unwanted line of questioning, but these attempts came across as comical, not menacing. He could even be funny once every four or five years, such as when he dropped in a reference to the Mona Lisa Vito character from the film “My Cousin Vinny” during the Deflategate saga.

Based on a random tour of the coverage of Belichick this week, the harsh stuff is coming from outside New England. But while Belichick’s sullen news conference performances never did him any harm back in the day — such as when the Patriots were competing for Super Bowls every year — he’ll be wise to freshen up the act at Chapel Hill.

Advertisement

Nothing says “old man yelling at a cloud” like being sullen with the 19-year-old kid from the college paper.

(Photo of Bill Belichick and Robert Kraft: Maddie Meyer / Getty Images)

More on Belichick

Why Bill Belichick abandoned hope of landing NFL job, pursuit of wins record

Why is Bill Belichick heading to North Carolina? It’s all about control

Has Bill Belichick closed the door on NFL victories record? There’s still time to evaluate

Advertisement

For UNC, hiring Bill Belichick was a risk it couldn’t afford not to take

Sports

2026 World Cup Round Of 16 Odds: Who’s Favored To Advance?

Published

on

2026 World Cup Round Of 16 Odds: Who’s Favored To Advance?

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In previous years, the Round of 16 was the first knockout stage match, but with an expanded field of 48 teams— it is now the second. 

Let’s check out the odds at FanDuel Sportsbook as of July 2 for which countries are favored to make the Round of 16 and emerge from it.

This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports.

To Reach Round of 16

Argentina: -2000 (bet $10 to win $10.50 total)
Colombia: -550 (bet $10 to win $11.82 total)
Portugal: -340 (bet $10 to win $12.94 total)
Switzerland: -235 (bet $10 to win $14.26 total)
Egypt: -148 (bet $10 to win $16.76 total)
Australia: +122 (bet $10 to win $22.20 total)
Algeria: +186 (bet $10 to win $28.60 total)
Croatia: +260 (bet $10 to win $36 total)
Ghana: +380 (bet $10 to win $48 total)
Cape Verde: +1160 (bet $10 to win $126 total)

Advertisement

Now let’s check out the odds at FanDuel Sportsbook as of July 2 for the matchups already in place.

SATURDAY, JULY 4

Canada vs. Morocco

To Advance: MAR -300, CAN +225
Moneyline: MAR -130, Draw +240, CAN +420

Paraguay vs. France

Advertisement

To Advance: FRA -1800, PRY +1140
Moneyline: FRA -600, Draw +600, PRY +1800

SUNDAY, JULY 5

Brazil vs. Norway

To Advance: BRA -245, NOR +196
Moneyline: BRA -120, Draw +260, NOR +340

Mexico vs. England

Advertisement

To Advance: ENG -134, MEX +110
Moneyline: ENG +145, Draw +210, MEX +200

MONDAY, JULY 6

USA vs. Belgium

To Advance: USA -110, BEL -110
Moneyline: USA +165, Draw +230, BEL +170

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Thousand Oaks native Claire Liu finally reaches Wimbledon’s third round, will face Coco Gauff

Published

on

Thousand Oaks native Claire Liu finally reaches Wimbledon’s third round, will face Coco Gauff

Claire Liu packed her bags and checked out of her London hotel room on Wednesday morning before heading to the All England Club.

It was more pragmatism than pessimism — a reality of a qualifier navigating her Wimbledon journey one day at a time.

But as her boyfriend reminded her while organizing her luggage: “Just because you’re packing doesn’t mean you’re leaving,” Liu recalled with a laugh.

He was right.

The Thousand Oaks native went on to win her second-round match against 51st-ranked Zeynep Sonmez of Turkey 7-5, 6-3, advancing to the third round of a Grand Slam for the first time in her professional career. She had tried 29 previous times at majors, including qualifying rounds, since 2015.

Advertisement

“I was just super relieved to get through that,” said Liu, noting she had blown a set and a break lead in the French Open’s second round last month.

For Liu, who turned 26 in May, returning to the manicured lawns of SW19 brings her tennis journey full circle. Nine years ago, she captured the 2017 Wimbledon girls’ singles title — the first American to do so since Chanda Rubin in 1992 — and was the No. 1 junior in the world. She still holds fond memories of that heady achievement, including chatting with her idol, Roger Federer, at the Wimbledon Champions Ball.

Yet, the transition from teenage phenom to professional mainstay has been anything but a linear ascent. When asked if she expected to be in the third round of a major this late in her career given her junior success, Liu was candid.

“Younger me would have believed it more than now,” she said.

That shift in perspective comes after weathering some brutal setbacks.

Advertisement

Liu climbed as high as No. 52 in early 2023 but then endured a wrist injury and took a months-long mental health hiatus in 2024 that eventually saw her ranking plummet outside the top 400 last year.

Currently sitting at No. 146, she’s been rebuilding her standing by playing a mix of WTA 125 events and ITF tournaments before returning to the main WTA Tour, with 2026 stops in far-flung places from Bahrain to Boca Raton and plenty of places in between.

“My goals haven’t changed, but I think the stress of how I got there really took a toll on me,” said Liu.

To navigate the darkness, Liu leaned heavily into both sports psychology and traditional therapy, including EMDR, a technique that helps people process traumatic experiences. She also started a Substack newsletter called “Finding Claire-ity,” where she openly chronicles her life and struggles on the tour.

The Southern California native, who has trained at the USTA facility in Carson since she was 9 years old and resides in Redondo Beach, also split with her longtime coach last season, a difficult decision, and hired Clemens Wagner.

Advertisement

The switch following the U.S. Open last year is clicking.

“I saw in her someone who fought a lot of battles inside herself,” says Austrian-born Wagner, who has a background in tennis analytics.

Together, they have focused on keeping an “aggressive undertone” on the grass, emphasizing coming to the net and squeezing the most out of her game.

Wagner notes that the 5-foot-7 player’s game isn’t the flashiest, but describes her as a “silent killer” who excels at “redirecting pace, standing close to the baseline, constantly putting pressure on her opponents.”

The reboot is starting to pay significant dividends.

Advertisement

Liu put together her best stretch in years this spring, winning a lower-tier title in Trnava, Slovakia, her first professional title since 2024, and then qualifying for the French Open.

Having again successfully navigated three rounds of qualifying to reach the main draw here, Liu has now won five consecutive matches at Wimbledon. Not surprisingly, she currently has no sponsors, just equipment support from Head Sport and Asics Corp., making her Wimbledon run particularly lucrative. By reaching the third round, Liu achieved her highest career payday: around $250,000. A victory Friday would boost that to nearly $400,000.

First, she faces her biggest test yet: a third-round contest against two-time major champion Coco Gauff on No. 1 Court, which perhaps fittingly is the same show court where Liu won the girls’ title almost a decade ago.

Gauff, 22, noted that she and Liu haven’t crossed paths much since Liu is older, but expects a serious battle. Gauff won both of their previous meetings on hard courts.

“I feel like anytime you’re playing a qualifier, it’s always tough because they have three matches already,” the seventh-seeded American said.

Advertisement

Liu, who didn’t even know she was playing Gauff until a reporter told her after her match, is purposefully keeping her focus narrow.

“I will just take today to be happy for winning, and then tomorrow I’ll think about it,” Liu said. “Obviously she’s one of the best players in the world right now, so that’ll be a good experience.”

Veteran Jessica Pegula, 32, the top-ranked American who also toiled away on the sport’s lower tier before becoming a top-10 mainstay, appreciates Liu’s resolve.

“It’s always nice to see girls that are figuring it out slowly but surely,” the No. 4 seed said. “I think I can relate to that.”

Liu’s accommodations? Fortunately, her mother was able to rebook the same hotel after the match, which eased some of the logistical issues for her unexpectedly extended stay in London.

Advertisement

“It definitely makes me stay in the moment, like, day by day,” Liu smiled of her lodging limbo.

On Wednesday morning, Liu packed her bags expecting she might leave Wimbledon. Instead, she emptied them one more time, with the biggest match of her career still waiting.

Continue Reading

Sports

USA World Cup star calls lack of appeal process for teammate’s red card ‘bogus’

Published

on

USA World Cup star calls lack of appeal process for teammate’s red card ‘bogus’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Folarin Balogun’s teammates came to his defense after the USA World Cup star was given a red card during the team’s 2-0 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wednesday night.

Balogun received the red card after he stepped on defender Tarik Muharemovic’s right ankle. Brazilian referee Raphael Claus only gave Balogun the card after a VAR review. The red card meant Balogun will not be able to play in the team’s Round of 16 match against Belgium.

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

United States’ Folarin Balogun, right, stands by after being issued a red card by Referee Raphael Claus, of Brazil, as United States’ Weston McKennie (8) looks on during the World Cup round of 32 soccer match between the United States and Bosnia in Santa Clara, Calif., near San Francisco, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Martin Meissner)

Advertisement

A FIFA official told The Athletic a team cannot appeal against the red card or the suspension. The official pointed the outlet to a portion of the organization’s rules and regulations, which states, “A sending-off automatically incurs suspension from the subsequent match. The FIFA judicial bodies may impose additional match suspensions and other disciplinary measures.”

Balogun’s teammate, Weston McKennie, called the lack of an appeal process “bogus” and disagreed with the referee’s decision to issue the red card.

Bosnia’s Sead Kolasinac (5) talks to United States’ Folarin Balogun after Balogun was sent off, as Christian Pulisic (10) watches during the World Cup round of 32 match between the United States and Bosnia in Santa Clara, Calif., Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (Julio Cortez / AP)

“Obviously the ref made a decision that he made, but I think it’s questionable,” McKennie said. “I think there’s been many other plays like that throughout the tournament on other players that a card wasn’t given at all. It’s disappointing.”

Advertisement

U.S. coach Mauricio Pochettino said Balogun’s act “was never intentional.”

“It’s never a red card. Never. … If the intention is to damage the opponent, OK, I understand. But that never was. It was a normal action in football that you are fighting for the ball and your feet land,” he said.

Balogun is the third player to score in a World Cup knockout match and be sent off. He follows Brazil’s Ronaldinho in 2002’s quarterfinal match against England and France’s Zinedine Zidane in the 2006 World Cup final against Italy.

Referee Raphael Claus of Brazil shows a red card to United States’ Folarin Balogun, right, during the World Cup round of 32 soccer match between the United States and Bosnia in Santa Clara, Calif., near San Francisco, Wednesday, July 1, 2026. (AP Photo/Julio Cortez)

It’s the fifth red card handed to an American in the squad’s World Cup history.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Eric Wynalda received one against Czechoslovakia in 1990, Fernando Clavijo got one against Brazil in 1994 and Pablo Mastroeni and Eddie Pope each received one against Italy in 2006.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending