Southeast
19 state attorneys general challenge blue states' 'radical' climate policies impacting others
Alabama is spearheading a coalition of 18 Republican-led states in a federal lawsuit against five Democrat-run states, alleging the latter are trying to coerce the former into complying with strict climate-conscious policies that could imperil their residents’ access to affordable energy.
The filing was made at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday as the plaintiffs argued that Democrat-led states California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Jersey and Rhode Island are essentially forcing residents of politically opposed states to feel repercussions of their restrictions and, therefore, are dictating national energy policy.
“California and New Jersey and the defendant states are trying to make national energy policy through state laws,” said Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, one state official who is party to the lawsuit. “And if the Supreme Court does not step in, they may succeed.”
“If the defendant states’ laws have their desired effects, fossil fuel energy companies across the nation will either be hit with massive damages or have to change their policies directly. And, those defendant states will affect the availability of cheap, affordable energy in our states,” he said.
“One state does not have the right to control policy in another state.”
GOP STATE AGS PRESS SUPREME COURT TO TAKE UP HAWAII CLIMATE CHANGE CASE THEY CALL A ‘GRAVE THREAT’
Of criticisms that it may not be apropos to escalate such a case immediately to the Supreme Court, Kobach said this is a rare instance where it is needed. He said the high bench has always had jurisdiction over interstate quarrels and that the “opposing interests” in this filing are especially stark.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, who is leading the charge, told Fox News Digital he has the right to take the complaint directly to the Supreme Court because it has original jurisdiction over state action. He pointed to other cases in which one state takes legal action against another and makes its plea to the high court.
“When you have two sovereigns that are making claims against one another, it is the appropriate venue for those claims to be heard,” he said.
CONSUMER GROUP REVEALS LEFT-WING GROUPS INCREASINGLY USING COURTS TO PUSH GREEN NEW DEAL
Marshall said the crux of the matter is essentially that defendant states are crafting climate policies that will have an undue effect on Alabama and its fellow plaintiff states.
“I think one of the things that is so most objectionable is the fact they are using common law claims, plus the statutory Deceptive Trade Practices Act claims, as a vehicle to engage in climate policy,” he said.
“I think, broadly, the issue is how does this affect the constituents of our individual states? And so the legitimate question is: Why should we care in Alabama how California chooses to operate in the state courts themselves?”
“Well, if California prevails, they’re really going to be able to do two things. They’re going to be able to impose a tax on carbon because that’s what [legal] ‘damages’ truly are in these cases,” Marshall said.
He expressed hope the Supreme Court would agree that energy and climate policy is a federal issue and not one the states can dictate in a way that could affect others.
BILLIONAIRE-FUELED ROCKEFELLER FUND COORDINATED CLIMATE LAWSUITS WITH DEM STATE AG: INTERNAL DOCUMENTS
The legal complaint reads in part: “Defendant States want a global carbon tax on the traditional energy industry” … “In their view, a small gas station in rural Alabama could owe damages to the people of Minnesota simply for selling a gallon of gas.”
The complaint cited API v. Minnesota, a case brought against energy firms for alleged harm caused by their contributions to global warming, among other things.
It also referenced a case from 1981 brought against West Virginia by bordering states who took issue with a policy that required Mountaineer natural gas producers to meet local needs before exporting their valuable energy source.
Kobach said this current multiparty lawsuit is one of a few qualified cases that should be heard first and ultimately by the Supreme Court:
“A relatively small number of cases can go directly to the Supreme Court because they are complex between one state and another or one group of states and another group of states,” Kobach said, adding that the high bench has at times declined to hear such cases.
Asked about what plaintiff states’ resources might be if New Jersey, California and the others are permitted to continue crafting policy with alleged wider-reaching effects than statutorily permitted, Kobach said Kansas, for example, has limited recourse.
“The second course of action would be [to] seek legislation in Congress, preempting what the defendant states have done, but that is a difficult process,” he said.
“It takes a long time, and it may come too late, depending on what happens in these defendant states.”
Kobach said the current suit is not the first of its kind. The Supreme Court previously upheld California’s sow housing law that plaintiffs said led to an avoidable spike in the cost of bacon and other pork products outside California.
Efforts to reach representatives for the defendant states in the case were unsuccessful.
Editor’s Note: This story originally reported 12 states had signed onto the lawsuit. Since its publication, that number has increased to 19.
Read the full article from Here
Southeast
Missing dog in Virginia captured after 6 months on the run: 'Almost lost hope'
When Samantha Paulino of Arlington, Virginia, adopted a rescue dog from South Korea, she had no idea that her new pet would survive for six months on the run by herself, eluding attempts to rescue her along the way.
Paulino’s dog, Autumn, arrived in the United States in Sept. 2023. From the beginning, it was clear to the owner that Autumn had anxiety and “a tendency to let loose and just wanting to be independent.”
Much of Autumn’s history before her rescue is unknown, Paulino told Fox News Digital in an on-camera interview. (See the video at the top of this article.)
LOST DOG IS SAFELY RESCUED AFTER IT SURVIVED ALONE IN THE WOODS FOR MORE THAN 6 YEARS
The dog was estimated to be about 2 or 3 years old when she was adopted, and her breed is described as a “Finnish spitz mix.”
“They knew that she was found in the streets [of South Korea],” Paulino said.
While Paulino experienced some of the typical growing pains associated with new dog ownership, she thought things had improved considerably by Dec. 2023.
“She was starting to lick me, show affection. She was starting to follow me and wanting to go on walks with me,” Paulino said.
Yet on Dec. 28, 2023, something spooked Autumn while on a walk in Arlington’s Virginia Square neighborhood — and she took off.
Despite the dog’s small size and weight – only about 12 pounds – nobody could catch her.
Despite her small size and weight – only about 12 pounds – nobody could catch her after that.
“She’s a speedster. She very much runs and speeds through everything,” Paulino said.
“So, if she gets loose and you try to chase her, she gets more frantic and just runs faster.”
With the dog gone, Paulino jumped into action immediately — printing flyers, alerting animal control authorities and posting about her missing dog on the Instagram account @findingAutumn_.
Sightings of Autumn were reported within days of her escape, but clever and speedy Autumn was always able to stay just out of reach of her would-be rescuers.
NEW YORK CITY AUTHOR’S BOOK PROMOTES THE ‘LIFE-CHANGING’ BENEFITS OF ADOPTING A SENIOR DOG
At the end of December, Autumn was spotted near Arlington National Cemetery, and after that, there were basically no sightings for about a month.
“I can’t lie,” said Paulino. “I almost, you know, lost hope at that point.”
But then, in early February, a woman named Katie contacted Paulino to say that she thought she’d spotted Autumn at Arlington National Cemetery. The woman had been performing in a military band.
Katie told Paulino she’d seen one of the lost dog flyers and was “100% sure” the dog she spotted was Autumn.
Autumn had made a home for herself at nearby Fort Myer, an Army post.
As it turns out, Autumn had made a home for herself at nearby Fort Myer, an Army post near Arlington National Cemetery.
Katie, a member of the military, was able to post Autumn’s lost dog flyers throughout Fort Myer because Paulino, a civilian, was not able to get on the base to do so.
MISSING DOG RESCUED AFTER SPENDING 18 HOURS STRANDED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE HIGHWAY: OWNER WAS ‘PANICKED’
“By the time Katie started posting flyers on the base, people on the base had started figuring out that, ‘Oh, she’s not a base dog,’” Paulino said.
“People from the military live there, so they thought that maybe she was just a dog being let loose,” she said.
Once it was clear to residents of Fort Myer that Autumn was a lost dog with an owner who very much missed her, the Animal Welfare League of Arlington (AWLA) and its animal control team got involved.
“They wouldn’t be able to invest their resources if there haven’t been accurate sightings of her,” Paulino said.
With the consistent sightings, the AWLA was able to establish Autumn’s patterns and habits and work from there to try to bring her home.
A representative from the AWLA told Fox News Digital in an email about the lengths the organization went to rescue Autumn.
“We felt confident that we could confine her.”
“We dedicated ourselves to tending to Autumn’s needs twice a day, going on-base (with permission) to feed her at her established feeding station, observing the area for her footprints and further familiarizing ourselves with her routines,” animal control services coordinator Anna Barrett said on behalf of the AWLA.
DOG RESCUED AFTER BEING CHASED OFF ‘STEEP CLIFFSIDE’ BY RACCOONS: VIDEO
After nearly six months of tracking and observing Autumn, “we reached that critical point when we felt confident that we could confine her,” Barrett said.
Trapping Autumn, despite her fairly small size, posed a challenge.
“Autumn would not be tricked into going inside a trap no matter what delicious treat sat just beyond the trip plate,” Barrett said. Instead, Autumn would sit on “her hill” and watch as her rescuers tried in vain to get her to (quite literally) take the bait.
“Autumn would not be tricked into going inside a trap no matter what delicious treat sat just beyond the trip plate.”
“Often, we’d sit quietly in our vehicles from afar and watch each other,” Barrett said.
The AWLA tried almost everything to catch Autumn — with no success.
Autumn even managed to evade “prototype traps that haven’t been commercially produced yet,” Paulino said.
Finally, using a “trap inside a trap,” Autumn fell for it on June 11, Paulino said.
A regular “box trap” was placed inside a “playpen type” of trap, she said, and her dog was finally captured.
And despite Autumn’s reticence to be captured, “once trapped, Autumn settled near to her rescuers, seemingly relieved that the long, lonely struggle had finally come to an end,” Barrett told Fox News Digital.
Autumn spent the night with the AWLA to — as Paulino described it — “decompress” from her six months on the run and then was finally reunited with her on Wednesday, June 12.
“It’s been a real process,” Paulino said. “It took a village to really get to the point where we are now.”
Even though Autumn spent nearly six months away from home, a veterinarian checked her out and found she was no worse for wear, Paulino said.
The next couple of weeks, as Autumn gets reacquainted to living in a house and with an owner, will be crucial, Paulino said. She is continuing to work with the AWLA to help Autumn transition into being a pet again.
For more Lifestyle articles, visit www.foxnews.com/lifestyle
“She was the hardest, most difficult catch that they’ve ever had in [AWLA Chief of Animal Control] Jen [Toussaint]’s career,” said Paulino. “So they’re very invested in making sure that she doesn’t escape again because, especially for this next two weeks, she might really want to be out again.”
Autumn is now wearing a GPS tracker, just in case, and will be double-leashed for her walks going forward, she said.
Read the full article from Here
Southeast
Abducted Louisiana child, 4, found dead and sister injured in suspected human trafficking case: police
A man accused of killing a Louisiana mother and abducting a 4-year-old and 6-year-old has been booked into a jail in Mississippi, police said.
The Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff’s Office announced on social media that officers arrested Daniel Callihan, 36, on Thursday, June 13.
Officers said that Callihan “committed brutal and heinous acts of violence” in the murders of Callie Brunett, 35, and her 4-year-old daughter, Erin.
“Our hearts are with all those affected by this tragic event. These are unspeakable crimes,” Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff Daniel Edwards said in a statement. “We ask everyone to keep Callie’s family in your prayers.”
4-YEAR-OLD FOUND DEAD, SISTER FOUND ALIVE AFTER MOTHER ‘BRUTALLY MURDERED’ IN LOUISIANA
In a press conference Thursday, Jackson Police Chief Joseph Wade said that an Amber Alert was first issued on June 13 for the two trafficked children.
Four-year-old, Erin, was found dead in the woods, authorities said.
“They located a deceased child in the woods,” Wade said. “We suspect that is one of the children that he had in his possession, in his possession illegally, that he had taken away from Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana.”
The other abducted child, 6-year-old Jalie, was found injured in the woods.
INDIANA FATHER WHO DROVE HIS TRUCK INTO SHALLOW RIVER, LET 2-YEAR-OLD EMMA SWEET DROWN, GETS 40-YEAR SENTENCE
“One of the Childs, a 6-year-old, has been taken to the hospital to receive treatment,” he said. “My understanding is that the 4-year-old is deceased in the woods.”
Wade shared that officers were still trying to determine the 4-year-old’s “manner of death.”
Calling the scene “traumatic,” Wade thanked fellow law enforcement agencies for their assistance in the investigation.
The Jackson Police Department asked during the news conference that anyone with information related to the case come forward and contact the department at (601) 960-1234.
Read the full article from Here
Southeast
North Carolina Gov. Cooper vetoes bill that would have required more juveniles to be tried as adults
North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper, a Democrat, vetoed a bill Friday that would have mandated that more minors accused of serious crimes automatically be tried as an adult in court.
As it currently stands, some criminal cases involving youth defendants may remain in juvenile proceedings.
House Bill 834 passed the House and Senate with significant bipartisan support before the veto from Cooper, who sided with critics of the measure who warned the changes scale back the provisions of the 2019 “Raise the Age” law that ended a mandate that children of ages 16 and 17 be tried in the adult criminal justice system.
The opposition to automatically prosecuting children in adult court was considered a way to help more young people avoid public, lifetime criminal records for one-time mistakes, while also giving them access to youth-centered resources within the juvenile system, which does not make records public.
NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL SEEKS FUNDS TO CREATE FENTANYL, COLD CASE UNITS
“I remain concerned that this new law would keep some children from getting treatment they need while making communities less safe,” Cooper wrote in his veto message.
The American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a letter to the governor ahead of his veto that prosecuting children as adults “causes significant harm to young people and does nothing to address the underlying causes of youth crime.”
“The juvenile justice system requires far more accountability, counseling, education, and family involvement than the adult system and it works better,” the letter reads. “Recidivism is significantly higher when children go through the adult system rather than receive the services and punishment from the juvenile system.”
Republican Sen. Danny Britt, who spearheaded the bill, said lawmakers worked to change the law to reflect the reality that young people charged with serious felonies ultimately ended up in adult court and that the legal efforts to move them there from juvenile court were clogging up prosecutors’ juvenile caseloads.
“From a practical standpoint this process improves efficiency in our courts,” Britt told The Associated Press, adding that he supported the “Raise the Age” legislation and still believes it was the correct move.
The bill now returns to the General Assembly, where lawmakers will attempt to override the governor’s veto. Eighteen Democrats in the House and Senate combined voted with all Republicans except one in favor of the legislation.
Republicans hold veto-proof majorities in the General Assembly, and overrode all 19 of Cooper’s vetoes last year. A bill that the governor vetoed earlier this year has not yet had a vote to override the veto.
According to juvenile justice law, cases of children ages 16 and 17 accused of the most serious felonies must be moved to adult court after a notice of an indictment or when a hearing determines there is probable cause that a crime was committed. Prosecutors have discretion not to try in adult court children these ages accused of some lower-grade felonies.
H.B. 834 would have ended the transfer requirement for most of these high-level felonies, but instead placed the cases of these minors in adult court automatically.
North Carolina was the last state where minors of ages 16 and 17 were automatically prosecuted as adults when “Raise the Age” was enacted. Children these ages are still being tried in adult court for vehicle-related crimes.
UNC BOARD OF GOVERNORS VOTES TO REPEAL DEI MANDATES FOR NORTH CAROLINA PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES
“Most violent crimes, even when committed by teenagers, should be handled in adult court,” Cooper said. “However, there are cases where sentences would be more effective and appropriate to the severity of the crime for teenagers if they were handled in juvenile court, making communities safer. This bill makes this important option highly unlikely.”
The bill would also have established a new process in which a case could be moved from Superior Court to juvenile court if the prosecutor and the defendant’s attorney agree to the transfer, and the adult records would be deleted.
Children ages 13 through 15 who are accused of first-degree murder will still be automatically transferred to adult court after an indictment or hearing that determines probable cause.
The legislation would also have raised penalties for adults who solicit a minor to commit a crime.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Read the full article from Here
-
News1 week ago
Would President Biden’s asylum restrictions work? It’s a short-term fix, analysts say
-
Politics1 week ago
Newson, Dem leaders try to negotiate Prop 47 reform off California ballots, as GOP wants to let voters decide
-
World1 week ago
Dozens killed near Sudan’s capital as UN warns of soaring displacement
-
News1 week ago
Read Justice Clarence Thomas’s Financial Disclosures for 2023
-
World1 week ago
‘Bloody policies’: Bodies of 11 refugees and migrants recovered off Libya
-
Politics1 week ago
Gun group vows to 'defend' Trump's concealed carry license after conviction
-
Politics1 week ago
Should Trump have confidence in his lawyers? Legal experts weigh in
-
Politics6 days ago
GOP releases Jan. 6 clip of Pelosi saying 'I take responsibility' as she discussed National Guard absence