Connect with us

Virginia

By the numbers: Documents reveal possible financial impact, risks of $2 billion arena project • Virginia Mercury

Published

on

By the numbers: Documents reveal possible financial impact, risks of  billion arena project • Virginia Mercury


After a state senator blocked two of three attempts to help bring two professional sports teams to Virginia, lawmakers are negotiating how — or if — to bring the Washington Wizards and Capitals to the commonwealth before the General Assembly session adjourns Saturday. 

The proposal, announced by Gov. Glenn Youngkin this December, envisions a sports arena, practice facility for the Wizards, and a performing arts venue, paired with new retail, residential, restaurants, hotels and conference facilities near Amazon HQ2 and the Virginia Tech Innovation Campus along the Potomac River in Alexandria.  

Two documents have been key for supporters in projecting positive aspects of the project, namely generating a fiscal impact of $12 billion and creating roughly 30,000 jobs. 

Virginia announces plan to bring two pro sports teams to Alexandria

Advertisement

Those documents appear to show that the potential benefits are contingent on the facility hosting hundreds of events annually, and that the success of the 9 million square foot entertainment district hinges on costs and interest rates remaining stable, though the plan includes some protections against creeping costs. 

While the arena project is a priority for Youngkin and Ted Leonsis, CEO of Monumental Sports and Entertainment, which owns the Wizards and Capitals franchises, it has garnered strong opposition from at least one high-profile Senate Democrat, Finance and Appropriations Committee Chair Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, as well as Alexandria resident groups, labor unions and others who depict its projections as overly optimistic. Those groups have pointed out that if arena revenues don’t live up to estimates, Virginia taxpayers could be on the hook for as much as $1.35 billion, according to one calculation reported by The Washington Post

Lucas has successfully killed standalone bills establishing an authority that would have the power to issue $2 billion in bonds for the project. But language creating the authority made it into the House budget, with a clause requiring General Assembly approval of the arena plan next year; it is now being considered privately by a select group of 12 legislators negotiating the state’s two-year budget. Youngkin, meanwhile, continues to have “productive conversations” with lawmakers, according to spokesman Christian Martinez, in hopes of convincing them to make the project a reality. 

Whether the project comes to fruition may also depend on other negotiations: Lucas and Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell, D-Fairfax, have previously indicated support may require Youngkin to negotiate with Democrats on other caucus priorities such as raising the minimum wage and allowing cannabis sales.

Advertisement

The two documents

Arguments that the arena will prove a financial net-positive for Virginia have rested on the conclusions of two documents: a project brief by investment bank J.P. Morgan and an economic and fiscal impact report prepared for the Alexandria Economic Development Partnership. The J.P. Morgan brief has never been made widely available to the public, while the Alexandria report was released in redacted form in mid-February.

“We released the full report … in the interest of transparency and to provide our community with greater detail on how this proposal could benefit Alexandria,” said partnership President and CEO Stephanie Landrum in a statement to the Mercury.

The J.P. Morgan brief, which was obtained by the Mercury, was a key document reviewed by the state’s Major Economic Incentives Project Approval Commission, a group of members of the General Assembly and the governor’s administration tasked with reviewing financing for individual incentive packages extended by the state to companies. The commission endorsed the arena plan unanimously this December, ahead of Youngkin’s announcement.

The brief includes graphical renderings of the proposed project and details of its financing plans, project phases, proposed number of jobs to be created and other potential benefits to the city of Alexandria and Virginia. 

Advertisement

Some Senate Democrats have criticized the reliance of the MEI Commission on the report as questionable, saying J.P. Morgan has a conflict of interest because even as it has analyzed the arena deal for the state, its asset management arm is advising a member of the partnership that owns the land where the arena would be sited.

Surovell said he is unaware of any code of business ethics or state law that would explicitly prohibit such an arrangement but said, “I think it’s more of an appearance issue.”

Youngkin’s office has insisted that the analysis conducted by J.P. Morgan for the MEI Commission was done by a completely separate part of the bank “and adhered to the intensive compliance regulations required,” Martinez said. He added that J.P. Morgan was selected to analyze the project for the MEI Commission through a bidding and procurement process. 

The J.P. Morgan brief also relies in part on the conclusions of a separate report analyzing the economic and fiscal impacts of the proposed project that was produced by HR&A Advisors, a development consulting firm hired by the Alexandria Economic Development Partnership. 

In its analysis, HR&A looked at two potential development scenarios: one in which the arena and its associated entertainment district are developed and a baseline scenario in which they are not and development of residential, retail and office space on the site occur organically. 

Advertisement

The arena scenario is based on a three-phase development schedule — the first to be completed by 2029, the second by 2031 and the third by 2036. 

Overall, it concludes that developing the arena and its associated entertainment district would produce “roughly 2.5 times the economic output of what would otherwise be built based on current development plans.”

Both the HR&A analysis and the J.P. Morgan brief indicated the project could be supported through multiple revenue sources including a 10% ticket tax on arena and performance venue events, underground parking and campus naming rights. 

220 events or more

Advertisement

The HR&A analysis assumes 221 events will be held at the arena and 115 events would be held at associated performing arts venues. The J.P. Morgan brief also cites the 221 annual event figure, projecting events at other facilities could drive that number much higher. 

J.P. Morgan notes revenues could suffer if the arena doesn’t host at least that many events. The bank also indicated there could be cost overruns, interest rate changes and unforeseen challenges.

“Underperformance could be caused by the arena not supporting 221 events a year, another pandemic, or various other factors outside the control of the commonwealth,” the brief states.

However, J.P. Morgan said the project’s risks are reduced by measures such as a financing structure that sets aside funds in a reserve to cover debt service.

The management group said revenues could decline by 50% and debt service would still be paid without the commonwealth or city needing to contribute any funds.

Advertisement

Underperformance could be caused by the arena not supporting 221 events a year, another pandemic, or various other factors outside the control of the commonwealth.

Michael O’Grady, a research economist and doctoral candidate at Virginia Commonwealth University, said he believes the number of projected arena events is “highly inflated,” and there’s a high likelihood that many won’t occur. Alexandria, O’Grady said, would still have to compete with other events in Washington, D.C. at Capital One Arena, which currently hosts the two teams and other sports and entertainment events.

He said Capital One Arena is able to pull in visitors from three Metrorail lines that converge at the adjacent Gallery Place-Chinatown Metro station, compared to only two that go through the Potomac Yard Metro station.

Advertisement

“I don’t see a lot of non-Monumental entertainment moving to Alexandria, just because location-wise, it’s a less desirable venue,” O’Grady said. 

Risks: cost overruns and interest rates

While the HR&A Advisors analysis did not not identify any fiscal concerns, the J.P. Morgan brief cites cost overruns as one of the project’s risks. 

“While significant work has been put into scoping out the project, it may still end up costing more than currently estimated,” the brief said. “However, the project is expected to be designed to the sources available, with the contractor responsible for overruns.”

Advertisement

Overrun risk, it noted, would be combated by “a fixed-price construction contract to protect against delay and cost overruns.”

Still, the question has troubled some lawmakers, with Sen. Adam Ebbin, D-Alexandria, who represents the area where the project would be built, saying, “It’s already very costly, and we can’t afford cost overruns on top of that as well.”

J.P. Morgan also noted increases in interest rates could drive up project costs, estimating an interest rate change of 0.5 percentage points could increase or decrease project costs by around $100 million.

In the event that revenues aren’t sufficient to cover the costs of paying back the project debt, the brief states Virginia and Alexandria would share responsibility for paying debt service on subordinate bonds, or loans that get paid back after others are repaid.

The brief says Virginia and Alexandria are each backstopping $560 million in debt, although it totals the various bonds Virginia is backstopping at $577 million. 

Advertisement

According to the brief, Public Resources Advisory Group, a financial adviser to Virginia that has reviewed the structure of the project, does not expect that the backstop will impair the commonwealth’s AAA credit rating.

30,000 or more jobs

Both the HR&A Advisors and J.P. Morgan documents said the project will generate at least 30,000 jobs by 2036.

A supplemental one-page document to HR&A’s report provided to the Mercury said the entertainment district could create 29,555 permanent jobs with an average wage of $75,000, and 17,645 construction jobs. A separate document produced by MonumentalALX, which is responsible for promotion of the project, indicated the project would generate 29,925 permanent jobs.

Advertisement

Monumental Sports would have an estimated 658 full-time office staff, and the arena would employ 242 people at an average salary of nearly $26,000 each, according to the two documents. O’Grady said that is “not a livable wage for anyone in Northern Virginia or in the D.C. area.”

The J.P. Morgan brief estimates the project would produce 36,960 permanent jobs and 17,645 construction jobs. Most of its permanent jobs — 20,940 — would not be created until the project’s final phase is completed in 2036. A total of 11,310 permanent jobs would be at the arena.

What all of those jobs could be would vary. Phase 1 of the project would add residential buildings, office space for Virginia Tech and Monumental Sports and Entertainment’s headquarters, a concert venue, parking, hotels and a conference center. Phases 2 and 3 would add more residential buildings, retail and office space.

O’Grady questioned the economic impact of more office spaces given that since the pandemic, more of the workforce is remote.

“The amount of actual office or economic activity that’s going to happen in this area is greatly inflated, compared to what it probably will be,” O’Grady said.

Advertisement

$12 billion economic impact

The J.P. Morgan brief projects the arena and entertainment district will have $12 billion in economic impact for both the city and state. Presentations by MonumentalALX based on the HR&A analysis cite the same figure.

Study finds arena plan would need $135 to $215 million in transportation investments

O’Grady questioned how soon Virginia would see a return on the project’s costs, estimating it would take 24 years for the bond debts to be paid off.

Advertisement

It’s tough to tell the true price of the project based on HR&A’s cost analysis document, O’Grady said, since parts of it are redacted and some of the projections were collected from developers, which have “private incentives to have this project go forward.”

“Because the break-even point is so far away, there is no real accountability mechanism here,” O’Grady said. “If this deal doesn’t generate what they promised, we can’t go back and hold leadership accountable. Gov. Youngkin will be long gone from office, along with most people in the state legislature and Alexandria government.”

$200 million in transportation costs

While HR&A did not include any information about transportation, the J.P. Morgan report said the project would require an additional $200 million for offsite transportation needs including widening bridges and roadways, creating pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure and relieving traffic congestion. 

Advertisement

A later study, commissioned by the Youngkin administration, Alexandria and Monumental and produced by engineering firm Kimley-Horn, found $135 to $215 million in transportation investments would be needed. That would be in addition to an extra $2.5 to $7.5 million annually for operational improvements such as increased Metro service.

According to the J.P. Morgan brief, the $2 billion in bonds needed for the project would include $110 million of investments in the development of onsite transportation.

Deputy Editor Samantha Willis contributed to this story. 

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement

Virginia

Documentary reveals roots of revolution in Southwest Virginia

Published

on

Documentary reveals roots of revolution in Southwest Virginia


Feeling oppression from the British crown and longing for freedom in their new land, a group of leaders gathered to sign a historic document stating their intention to break ties with England and fight for independence.

However, this pivotal moment in the American Revolution was not what you might expect — it occurred more than a year before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, and it didn’t happen at Independence Hall in Philadelphia.

Advertisement

This declaration of liberty was the Fincastle Resolutions, signed in January 1775, right here in Southwest Virginia.

A new PBS documentary, “Resolved to Live and Die,” was filmed on location throughout the region and brought to life through historical reenactments “that vividly capture the peril, passion, and patriotism” of those fighting for freedom during the Revolutionary War era in Southwest Virginia, according to the filmmakers.

The film’s goal is to honor the region’s pivotal — and often overlooked — role in shaping the Revolution.

The documentary is part of the ongoing Virginia 250 celebration, focusing on the state’s involvement in the American Revolution. It is a co-production of Blue Ridge PBS, PBS Appalachia, the Wilderness Road Regional Museum in Dublin and the Willowbrook Jackson/Umberger Homestead Museum in Wytheville. 

Advertisement

The film debuts at 7 p.m. Sunday on Blue Ridge PBS.

The poster for “Resolved.” Courtesy of Blue Ridge PBS

“I hope people will realize that Southwest Virginia played a huge part in the fight for independence,” said Michael Gillman, manager of historic sites for Wytheville Museums. “From 1776-1781, all major events in Virginia were west of the Blue Ridge Mountains.”

At the time, Southwest Virginia was the western edge of the colonies.

The 15 frontiersmen who signed the Fincastle Resolutions did so in support of the Continental Congress’ boycott of British goods in protest of the Intolerable Acts. It was written as an address to Virginia’s delegates to the First Continental Congress.

“These men, many of them frontier leaders and militia captains, risked everything — family, land and even their lives — by publicly defying the British Crown,” Blue Ridge PBS said in an announcement of the documentary’s premiere. “Their commitment would ripple through history and contribute directly to the birth of the United States.”

Advertisement

The title of the film is taken directly from the closing words of the Fincastle Resolutions. The document defended the colonists’ “inestimable privileges” as rightful British subjects, which they swore “never to surrender … to any power upon earth, but at the expense of our lives … These are our real, though unpolished sentiments, of liberty and loyalty, and in them we are resolved to live and die.”

April Martin of the Wilderness Road Regional Museum said the two museums involved “have written, arranged, filmed, edited, recruited all the living historians for scenes, organized all the filming locations, and in general are the two organizations responsible for the documentary.”

She and Gillman are partners in the production.

Martin said her museum had worked with Blue Ridge PBS previously on the “Story of the New River” documentary, and a producer asked Martin if she had other ideas.

“I immediately offered up this one,” she said.

Advertisement

Coincidentally, Gillman also had contacted PBS Appalachia at the same time about a short documentary on the Fincastle Resolutions. So, they joined forces to create “Resolved to Live and Die.”

“I started the ball rolling on some VA250 sponsorship money, which came through,” Martin said. “Pulaski County came through [with funding] and Wytheville Museums had some sponsors and grants, as well, to help the project along.”

They also received some money from Virginia Tech’s history department, along with other sources from Blue Ridge PBS and PBS Appalachia.

A war on many fronts

Win Webster as Col. William Preston - one of the signers of the Fincastle Resolutions - at his residence, Historic Smithfield in Blacksburg. Photo courtesy of PBS Appalachia
Win Webster as Col. William Preston — one of the signers of the Fincastle Resolutions — at his residence, Historic Smithfield in Blacksburg. Photo courtesy of PBS Appalachia

Martin said the film touches on a variety of topics related to the war — the Tory Uprising, the pivotal Battle of King’s Mountain in 1780, the Guilford Courthouse Campaign — as well as other aspects of life from that period, such as religious freedom on the frontier, what life was like for the common soldier, the experiences of women and enslaved people, the Cherokee War of 1776, and the importance of Southwest Virginia resources such as lead and gunpowder for the war effort.

“We also explore life in the area, from settlers moving into the area to having to choose sides in the war. … I also think it’s very interesting to see the war through the viewpoint of the enslaved and native Americans,” said Carol Jennings of Blue Ridge PBS, producer of the documentary.

Advertisement

Leaders such as William Christian, William Preston, William Campbell, William Ingles, James McGavock, Joseph Cloyd, George Pearis, William Madison, Hugh Crockett and many more were included in the filming, Martin said.

Blue Ridge PBS notes that Campbell and Crockett “emerged from this rugged landscape to lead Virginian Overmountain Men in the decisive 1780 Battle of Kings Mountain, defeating British Major Patrick Ferguson and helping turn the tide of the war.”

Jennings said that Fincastle leader William Preston “is a thread that runs through the doc … which helps tie things together. He was definitely a mover and shaker of the era.”

Preston was a military commander, politician, surveyor and planter. During the war, he held British loyalists, known as Tories, from an uprising in Southwest Virginia, and later fought Cornwallis’ British troops in the Carolinas.

Gillman said the film doesn’t focus on specific people as much as “a group of prominent men from the area who united to join the fight for independence. It will touch on their struggles with the natives and the British crown and what ethnicities settled in this area. It will also share the story of Loyalists in the area who remained loyal to England.”

Advertisement

That America’s rebellion against England was not supported by all colonists is often glossed over in historical accounts of the Revolutionary War.

“For me, I think the most compelling aspect is that the war was truly a civil war, where families and people who were once friends found themselves on opposite sides of a very thorny issue — to support the crown or not,” Jennings said.

Reenacting the Revolution

Blue Ridge PBS filmed scenes for “Resolved to Live and Die” at the Wilderness Road Museum, The Homestead Museum in Wytheville, Abingdon Muster Grounds and sites throughout Southwest Virginia Courtesy of Blue Ridge PBS
Blue Ridge PBS filmed scenes for “Resolved to Live and Die” at the Wilderness Road Museum, the Homestead Museum in Wytheville, Abingdon Muster Grounds and sites throughout Southwest Virginia. Courtesy of Blue Ridge PBS

“It was a challenge to come up with the visuals for the program,” Jennings said. “Photography didn’t come along until the mid-1800s and so there is limited imagery for the Revolutionary War period.”

When it came time to film reenactments, though, the museums found they had plenty of resources available.

“Luckily, both museums had many knowledgeable living historians eager to help out and many contacts for land access and filming privileges,” Martin said.

On Jan. 18 — just two days shy of the event’s 250th anniversary — the kitchen house at the Willowbrook Jackson/Umberger Homestead Museum in Wytheville was converted to the Fincastle Courthouse to film the Jan. 20, 1775, signing of the Fincastle Resolutions. Later, the museum was transformed into McGavock’s Tavern for a recreation of a trial of suspected Tories.

Advertisement

At the Abingdon Muster Grounds, the crew filmed a scene of the Overmountain Men mustering to march to King’s Mountain.

At the Wilderness Road Regional Museum, a skirmish between Patriots and Tories was filmed, in addition to a Tory conspiracy meeting and scenes of women doing 18th-century activities, Jennings said.

The film crew shot various scenes with an actor playing William Preston at Historic Smithfield. 

Other sites filmed included Ingles Tavern, Belle-Hampton Farm, Howe/Hoge Cemetery, McGavock Cemetery, St. John’s Church, New Dublin Presbyterian Church, Fort Witten and Fotheringay, as well as highway markers, cemeteries, memorials “and so many other places throughout Southwest Virginia that were once part of Fincastle County,” Martin said.

Until she sees the final version of the film, though, Martin doesn’t know which scenes will be used.

Advertisement

“These cinematic scenes immerse viewers in the tension of the times, where even fellow colonists were divided — Tories loyal to England clashing violently with patriots seeking independence,” according to Blue Ridge PBS. “This rift often escalated into brutal vigilante justice, reminding us that the revolution was not only fought on battlefields, but also in backyards and town halls.”

Understanding the region’s role

Blue Ridge PBS filmed scenes for “Resolved to Live and Die” at the Wilderness Road Museum, The Homestead Museum in Wytheville, Abingdon Muster Grounds and sites throughout Southwest Virginia Courtesy of Blue Ridge PBS
Blue Ridge PBS filmed scenes for “Resolved to Live and Die” at the Wilderness Road Museum, The Homestead Museum in Wytheville, Abingdon Muster Grounds and sites throughout Southwest Virginia. Courtesy of Blue Ridge PBS

The filmmakers said they hope to shine a light on the essential but little-known contributions of people from Southwest Virginia to the fight for freedom.

Jennings expects that some viewers will get a geography lesson, as she did.

“Before working on this project, I had no idea that Fincastle County had ever existed,” she said. “I suspect I’m not the only one. I think most people would assume the Fincastle Resolutions are tied to the present-day town of Fincastle in Botetourt County, when they’re not. Fincastle County only lasted four short years and covered a huge area.”

She also hopes the audience “will come to appreciate how difficult it was to pick sides.”

Advertisement

Martin said she wants viewers to gain an understanding of what this region’s people stood for during the war.

“I want people to learn that our region was an active part of the Revolution and an oftentimes dangerous place with mixed loyalties,” she said. “And how the war impacted the multicultural melting pot of Appalachia during that time. It wasn’t just Patriots versus the British, but layers of complicated history that need to be remembered and understood in order to better understand the larger context of the overall war.”

She hopes they come away with “an appreciation of what the people of Southwest Virginia did for our new nation.”

Public screenings

Blue Ridge PBS will hold two public screenings of “Resolved to Live and Die: The Revolutionary Roots of Southwest Virginia.” Each event includes a Q&A session and a preview of “The American Revolution,” the new film by acclaimed documentarian Ken Burns, Sarah Botstein and David Schmidt.

Dates and locations include:

Advertisement

• Tuesday at the O. Winston Link Museum in Roanoke. Doors open at 6 p.m. to explore the museum’s exhibits. The preview and screening begin at 7 p.m.

• Thursday at the Millwald Theatre in Wytheville. Doors open at 6:30 p.m.; the preview and screening begin at 7 p.m. 

Each showing will include a Q&A session. According to a post by the Millwald, the film will be followed by “an engaging panel discussion featuring the filmmakers and historians, offering behind-the-scenes insights, historical context, and a deeper look at the stories that shaped our nation’s founding.”

Support for the documentary was provided by VA250, Pulaski County, the Town of Wytheville Museums, Bank of Marion, Visit Wytheville, Virginia Tech Department of History, Wytheville Community College and donations from PBS viewers.

To watch a trailer:

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Virginia

Virginia Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger warns state heading toward

Published

on

Virginia Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger warns state heading toward


Virginia Gov.-elect Abigail Spanberger — who promised during her campaign to prioritize affordable energy if she won — on Sunday doubled down on her views of the “energy crisis” that her state will face without new policies to hold the biggest users accountable.

“There’s some bad energy policies in some of our neighboring states that have driven up prices, particularly in southwest Virginia,” Spanberger said Sunday on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.” “We have to be clear-eyed about the fact that we will have an energy crisis headed into the future.”

Virginia has the world’s largest concentration of data centers, which are facilities designed to house the technical infrastructure that allow artificial intelligence to operate, and demand for them has only continued to grow as the AI boom proliferates. But these data centers use massive amounts of energy.

Data centers can bring financial benefits to the areas where they’re located, including in Virginia, where Gov. Glenn Youngkin said they resulted in $1 billion in tax revenue in 2024. But they also contribute to rising energy costs for consumers. Power bills in Virginia, for example, have increased by nearly 7% over the last year.

Advertisement

To offset the public burden of those rising prices, Spanberger has proposed a multi-pronged policy approach that involves ramping up energy production in Virginia and requiring data centers to pay “their fair share” for it.

“It will be important that large-scale energy users, particularly data centers, that the public know that they are paying their fair share for the energy that they are using,” Spanberger said, echoing remarks from her victory speech in last week’s election. “And we have to increase our energy production here at home, so that we can meet the demand, certainly of larger-scale energy users, but also of increased demand from our communities.”

Working to ensure “data centers don’t drive up energy costs for everyone else in Virginia” is one of the main pillars of Spanberger’s energy affordability plan. The plan stipulates that the facilities should pay their share of the cost for electricity generation and transmission capabilities “that must be built to power them.” Other tenets of her proposal include increasing local energy generation, storing energy more efficiently, addressing regulatory issues between states and making existing energy subsidy programs more accessible for low-income residents.

“It’s a real challenge that we have to get ahead of,” Spanberger said Sunday. “It’s a challenge that is pervasive in our communities, and particularly acute in southwest Virginia.”

A Democrat who previously represented northern and central Virginia in Congress, Spanberger won this year’s gubernatorial election, against Republican incumbent Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, by more than 14 points. She will be Virginia’s first woman governor when she assumes office in January.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Virginia

Men’s Basketball Falls To Virginia Tech In OT, 107-101, In Hall Of Fame Tip-Off – Providence College Athletics

Published

on

Men’s Basketball Falls To Virginia Tech In OT, 107-101, In Hall Of Fame Tip-Off – Providence College Athletics


UNCASVILE, Conn. – The Providence College men’s basketball team was defeated in overtime by the Virginia Tech Hookies, 107-101 on Saturday, Nov. 8 at the Mohegan Sun in Uncasville, Conn. Graduate student Jason Edwards (Atlanta, Ga.) led the team with 28 points. Fellow graduate student Jaylin Sellers (Columbus, Ga.) added 26. Oswin Erhunmwunse (Benin City, Nigeria) recorded his fourth career double-double, with 11 points and 11 rebounds.  

“Hard fought game.” Head Coach Kim English said. “Give Virginia Tech credit. They did a lot of good things down the stretch, especially in overtime. The shot making in that game was at a high level.” 

FIRST HALF: 

• On the Friars’ first defensive possession, Oswin Erhunmwunse brought the crowd to its feet with an emphatic block on a Virginia Tech dunk attempt. 

Advertisement

Jaylin Sellers opened the scoring for Providence, connecting on two free throws to tie the game at 2 (18:17). 

• Virginia Tech responded with a 6-2 scoring run before Jason Sellers assisted Erhunmwunse on an and-one, alley-oop dunk. The Hokies scored on the ensuing possession to make it 10-7, Virginia Tech, going into the first media timeout.  

• A deep three point make by Jason Edwards pulled the Friars within five, 17-12 (14:09).  

• A Virginia Tech three-pointer followed by a Ryan Mela (Natick, Mass.) floater made it 20-14 Hokies going into the second media timeout. 

• Out of the timeout, back-to-back three pointers from Stefan Vaaks (Tabasalu, Estonia) and Sellers tied the game at 20 (10:51).  

Advertisement

• Jamier Jones (Sarasota, Fla.) stole a pass and got out in transition for a fast break dunk for his first points of the game (9:39).  

• Back-to-back driving efforts from Sellers and Corey Floyd Jr. (Franklin, N.J.) gave the Friars their first lead of the night, 26-25 (8:39). 

• Providence extended its lead going into the media timeout after a Sellers three pointer that made it 29-27 (7:23).  

• The game was notched at 37 after both teams traded baskets on four consecutive possessions before a Virginia Tech timeout (4:45).  

• A 7-0 run on a pair of free throws from Duncan Powell (Dallas, Texas) followed by another Sellers three and two free throws from Erhunmwunse made it 44-37, giving the Friars their largest lead of the game (0:40).  

Advertisement

• A Virginia Tech three followed by a pair of Edwards free throws made it 46-40 going into the half.  

• Providence shot 15-34 (44.21) from the field, 7-17 (41.2%) from three, and 9-10 (90.0%) from the free-throw line.   

• Virginia Tech shot 14-32 (43.8%) from the field, 7-16 (43.8%) from three, and 6-6 (83.3%) from the free-throw line.    

• Providence held the edge in rebounding, 19-17.  

• Sellers led the Friars with 13 points in the first 20 minutes.   

Advertisement

• Virginia Tech’s Neoklis Avdalas led all scorers with 17.  

SECOND HALF: 

• Sellers picked up where he left off, scoring on a driving layup and a turnaround jumper to open the scoring in the second half to make it 50-42, Providence (18:18). 

• The teams traded baskets on four straight possessions before a 10-0 Virginia Tech run that gave them the lead 56-54 (14:29). 

• Vaaks converted on a jumper to tie the game at 56 on the following possession (14:07). 

Advertisement

•  Two possessions later, Vaaks answered a Virginia Tech three with one of his own to tie the game at 61 going into the second media timeout (11:15). The three marked Vaaks third of the game.  

• Out of the timeout, Sellers continued his strong shooting performance with a three pointer that gave the Friars a three-point lead, 64-61, before the media timeout (10:02).  

• A blow by layup by Edwards followed by a Virginia Tech basket put the score at 67-67 going into the media timeout (7:36).  

• Out of the time out, Edwards connected on a three-pointer pass from Cole Hargrove () to give the Friars a three-point lead.  

• Jamier Jones threw down his second alley-oop dunk of the game on an assist from Edwards to keep the Friars up three following two Virginia Tech free throws (6:49). 

Advertisement

• Oswin Erhunmwunse connected on two free throws awarded to him on a flagrant foul to tie the game at 74. The Friars retained possession and Stefan Vaaks connected on his fourth three pointer of the night to give Providence the 77-74 lead (5:27).  

• Fast back and forth action resulted in Virginia Tech leading, 82-81, going into the final media timeout. Layups by Sellers and Mela kept the Friars within one (3:03).  

• A Duncan Powell free throw on the front end of a one-and-one, followed by an offensive rebound and Jason Edwards pull-up jumper tied the game at 84 with under two minutes remaining (1:54). 

• A pair of Edwards free throws gave the Friars the two-point lead before a Virginia Tech timeout (1:06). 

• A put back layup by Virginia Tech tied the game at 86 with 7 seconds remaining. The Friars brought the ball up the court and called a timeout with 3.8 seconds remaining.  

Advertisement

• The Friars inbounded the ball to Stefan Vaaks who attempted a step back three that rattled around the rim and bounced out. End of regulation.  

OVERTIME:  

• Erhunmwunse answered Virginia Tech’s quick first basket to keep it tied at 88 (4:34).  

• Virginia Tech went on a 6-0 run that forced a Providence timeout (3:23).  

• A Jason Edwards driving layup followed by Stefan Vaaks hitting all three free throws after being fouled on a three-point-attempt pulled the Friars within 1, 96-95 (2:11). 

Advertisement

• A 4-0 run by Virginia Tech, after a Sellers layup, gave them a six-point lead, 103-97, with under a minute remaining.  

• The Friars converted layups and made free throws, but Virginia Tech made its free throws down the stretch to secure the win.  

HIGHLIGHTS: 

• Four players finished in double figures for the Friars: Edwards (28), Sellers (26), Vaaks (17) and Erhunmwunse (11). 

• Virginia Tech forward Neoklis Avdalas finished with 33 points, earning him the game’s most valuable player award.  

Advertisement

Oswin Erhunmwunse finished with a team high 11 rebounds and a game high four blocks.  

• Erhunmwunse recorded his first double double of the season and the fourth of his career. 

Stefan Vaaks connected on four three pointers.   

• Providence’s bench outscored Virginia Tech’s 27-20, with two in double figures.  

• Providence held the rebound advantage, 43-42.  

Advertisement

• Providence shot 34-76 (44.7%) from the field, 11-33 (33.3%) from three, and 22-25 (88.0%) from the free-throw line.   

• Virginia Tech shot 40-79 (50.6%) from the field, 12-28 (42.9%) from three, and 15-22 (68.2%) from the free-throw line.     

NOTES: 

• The Friars have posted a 4-6 mark all-time versus Virginia Tech. 

• The Friars scored 100 points in a game for the first time since January 17, 2024 against DePaul. 

Advertisement

• The last time the Friars lost a game when scoring over 100 points was on Jan. 23, 2010 against the University of South Florida, 109-105. 

• The Friars fell to 80-72 all-time in OT games. 

• Providence has posted a 3-1 mark all-time versus the Hokies at home.  PC is 1-3 on the road versus Virginia Tech and 0-2 in neutral arenas. 

• The Friars are 137-199 all-time versus teams from the ACC. 

• Saturday marked the first of two games the Friars will play at Mohegan Sun this season and PC’s eighth game all-time at Mohegan Sun Arena.  

Advertisement

• The Friars have posted a 3-6 mark all-time at Mohegan Sun Arena. 

UP NEXT: 

The Friars will host Penn in Providence, R.I. on Saturday Nov. 11 at the Amica Mutual Pavilion.  

Tip-off is scheduled for 7:00 p.m. The game will be streamed on ESPN+. 

-GO FRIARS!-   

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending