Connect with us

South-Carolina

Investigation brings scrutiny to program invested in by South Carolina, 10 other states that claimed to help find missing kids

Published

on

Investigation brings scrutiny to program invested in by South Carolina, 10 other states that claimed to help find missing kids


“A former NFL participant persuaded politicians that his little one ID kits assist discover lacking children. There’s no proof they do.” was first revealed by The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan media group that informs Texans — and engages with them — about public coverage, politics, authorities and statewide points.

This text is co-published with ProPublica, a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of energy. Join ProPublica’s Huge Story publication to obtain tales like this one in your inbox as quickly as they’re revealed.

Additionally, join The Temporary, our every day publication that retains readers up to the mark on essentially the most important Texas information.


Final fall, tens of millions of public faculty youngsters in Texas introduced residence envelopes that bore the state seal and browse, “A present of security, from our household to yours.”

Advertisement

Tucked into every envelope have been an inkpad and a chunk of paper prompting dad and mom to take their youngsters’s fingerprints, document their bodily attributes and get a DNA pattern by having them suck on the nook of the shape.

Each envelope additionally got here with a warning: “Over 800,000 youngsters are lacking yearly — that’s one each 40 seconds.”

The fingerprinting kits have been produced by the Nationwide Youngster Identification Program, a Waco-based firm that has persuaded lawmakers and attorneys basic in no less than 11 states to offer the kits, at occasions spending tens of millions of {dollars} buying them. In Texas alone, lawmakers allotted about $5.7 million on kits for all college students in kindergarten by way of eighth grade. They’re at present contemplating funding further kits for the subsequent two years.

However related kits can be found without cost from nonprofit and governmental entities, and claims made by the corporate in regards to the variety of lacking youngsters and the effectiveness of such kits are exaggerated, in accordance with lacking little one and regulation enforcement specialists.

“The organizations selling the kits are preying on individuals’s fears,” stated Stacey Pearson, a toddler security marketing consultant who oversaw the Louisiana Clearinghouse for Lacking and Exploited Youngsters throughout a 20-year stint with the Louisiana State Police.

Advertisement
The envelopes that include the Nationwide Youngster Identification Program’s fingerprinting kits declare that over 800,000 youngsters go lacking yearly. The determine is outdated and exaggerated, in accordance with specialists. Credit score: Obtained by The Texas Tribune and ProPublica

Pearson known as the kits “crime management theater,” a time period used to explain prison justice legal guidelines and insurance policies that make individuals really feel as if they’re being proactive however in actuality accomplish little. “They’re promoted as preventative measures, however they’re not preventative in any respect,” she stated.

The Nationwide Youngster Identification Program, or NCIDP, is led by Kenny Hansmire, a former NFL participant who has a string of failed enterprise ventures, has racked up tens of millions of {dollars} in excellent federal tax liens, has twice pleaded responsible to felony theft and, in 2015, was sanctioned by banking regulators in Connecticut for his position in an alleged scheme to defraud or mislead traders, an investigation by ProPublica and The Texas Tribune discovered.

Hansmire has deep connections throughout the world {of professional} and faculty soccer, and he promotes these relationships whereas searching for help for his little one ID kits from elected officers. He has supplied to honor lawmakers and attorneys basic at high-profile occasions corresponding to soccer video games, the place he has handed out awards at pregame ceremonies and lauded supportive officers as little one security champions.

In touting his kits, Hansmire has cited a function that he says makes them superior: They use a colorless chemical resolution somewhat than the same old black ink, leading to much less mess. He stated dad and mom and guardians can retailer the kits at residence and current them to regulation enforcement if their youngsters disappear.




A trifold brochure prompts dad and mom to document their youngsters’s bodily description, acquire a saliva pattern and take their fingerprints utilizing the enclosed “inkless” resolution. Credit score: Obtained by The Texas Tribune and ProPublica

Over time, Hansmire has claimed that the kits helped regulation enforcement determine a number of lacking youngsters and that officers say they’re useful within the early levels of a search.

[Inside 30 years of former NFL player Kenny Hansmire’s troubled businesses]

Advertisement

In an interview final yr with the information organizations, he advisable that reporters name varied Texas regulation enforcement businesses and converse to “any policeman” about their effectiveness, particularly mentioning the case of a runaway woman in Dallas whom he stated was discovered with using a fingerprinting package.

The information organizations did simply that, contacting 15 police departments and sheriff’s places of work within the state’s main metropolitan areas, together with three Hansmire talked about particularly.

Out of the 11 regulation enforcement businesses that responded, none may recall utilizing a package to assist discover a runaway or kidnapped little one. The chief director of the Sheriffs’ Affiliation of Texas additionally stated he couldn’t consider a case by which the kits helped.

ProPublica and the Tribune additionally discovered that the startling determine Hansmire and his firm have repeatedly cited to advertise his product is inflated.

Eight hundred thousand youngsters don’t go lacking yearly. The determine, which comes from a 24-year-old Division of Justice examine, is now not correct and overstates the size of the lacking youngsters drawback, in accordance with David Finkelhor, a co-author of the report. Practically half of the instances cited within the examine, for instance, are for kids who’re lacking for “benign” causes corresponding to spending the night time at a pal’s home or coming residence later than anticipated, stated Finkelhor, the director of the Crimes In opposition to Youngsters Analysis Middle on the College of New Hampshire.

Advertisement

“It’s a mistaken quantity to quote with none context,” Finkelhor stated. “It sounds very scary and isn’t a great reflection of the variety of children who want severe regulation enforcement mobilization.”

Hansmire stated his firm’s messaging has shifted away from what he known as the “traditionally excessive” variety of lacking youngsters, although on the time of publication his web site continued to function the declare. However, he stated, the quantity itself shouldn’t matter as a result of “one lacking or exploited little one is one too many.”

Serial entrepreneur

A San Antonio native, Hansmire performed within the NFL within the mid-Nineteen Eighties for the Houston Oilers and Philadelphia Eagles.

After retiring, he sought to reinvent himself as an entrepreneur. He teamed up with a Dallas inventor to kind an organization known as Inkless Picture Safety Corp. in 1996 and later filed a patent utility for an “inkless fingerprint methodology” that will enable companies and different entities to confirm the authenticity of paperwork.

In January of that yr, 9-year-old Amber Hagerman disappeared whereas driving her bicycle close to her grandparents’ residence in Arlington. She was discovered useless 4 days later. Her homicide received Hansmire fascinated about the necessity for little one ID kits, he later informed the San Angelo Customary-Instances. He pushed for widespread distribution of the kits, speaking with police departments, church buildings and colleges, however discovered no takers.

Advertisement

“Feeling overwhelmed, Hansmire prayed in regards to the scenario, and, throughout the night time, one thing informed him to name Grant Teaff,” the story acknowledged.

Kenny Hansmire leads the Nationwide Youngster Identification Program, a Waco-based firm. Credit score: Lauren Crow for The Texas Tribune and ProPublica

Teaff, a legendary former Baylor College soccer coach, had simply grow to be government director of the American Soccer Coaches Affiliation and was working to develop the group. Hansmire shortly bought him on the concept of a program that will distribute free inkless little one identification kits at soccer video games throughout the nation.

In a video final yr celebrating NCIDP’s twenty fifth anniversary, Teaff thanked Hansmire for his “imaginative and prescient, ardour and relentless dedication” whereas describing Hagerman’s disappearance as a serious inspiration for the collaboration.

“It took her dad and mom a number of days to offer regulation enforcement with wanted info,” Teaff stated. “On the time, lower than 2% of oldsters had copies of their little one’s fingerprints.”

Arlington Police Division spokesperson Tim Ciesco disputed Teaff’s assertion that fingerprinting kits would have made a distinction in Hagerman’s case, saying her dad and mom supplied a photograph and primary descriptive particulars. “The larger problem for us was getting that info extensively circulated to the general public,” Ciesco stated. The case was the impetus for the Amber Alert, a notification system for lacking youngsters.

Teaff didn’t reply questions on his relationship with Hansmire, the corporate or Ciesco’s feedback. He did, nevertheless, categorical his continued help for the corporate.

Advertisement

The collaboration with the coaches affiliation got here at a vital time for Hansmire, who had confronted a sequence of authorized and monetary troubles, in accordance with public data.

Within the decade earlier than the partnership, Hansmire pleaded responsible to 2 felony costs — cattle theft in 1988 and theft by verify in 1993 — and was convicted of drunken driving. He received 75 days in jail, a $500 advantageous and a one-year license suspension for the DWI. For the 2 felony costs, he acquired deferred adjudication, a course of that lets individuals accused of sure crimes keep away from a conviction in the event that they efficiently full probation with out every other violations. The phrases of his probation included drug and alcohol packages and lots of of hours of group service along with paying 1000’s of {dollars} in restitution.

Hansmire and varied firms he based have been sued no less than 4 occasions within the Nineties for unpaid money owed together with hire, in accordance with court docket data. A decide ordered him to pay in three of these instances. He reached a settlement within the fourth case. He additionally started to rack up what would ultimately grow to be tens of millions in federal tax liens, public data present.

Over the subsequent decade, Hansmire pursued a sequence of entrepreneurial ventures that centered on faculty soccer all-star video games in Hawaii and Texas. The businesses, which confronted a number of lawsuits and monetary and public relations struggles, ultimately fizzled.

In an effort to lift funds for his companies, Hansmire linked up with a Connecticut securities dealer named Dale Quesnel. Quesnel acquired $166,000 to steer no less than 10 traders to lend $1.9 million to Hansmire’s firms, in accordance with public data. One of many promissory notes obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune reveals Hansmire pledged to pay again the cash at an rate of interest of 12%.

Advertisement

The Connecticut Division of Banking investigated the scheme and located that the lads defrauded or misled traders in violation of the state’s securities regulation. It decided that Hansmire and Quesnel did not register the promissory notes they bought to traders and to inform them of the dangers related to the loans. In June 2015, the division ordered the lads to cease searching for investments and to pay an undisclosed quantity in restitution.

Quesnel did not pay, in accordance with a March 2019 settlement settlement his employer reached with the Banking Division. Neither he nor the employer responded to requests for remark.

Hansmire reached a settlement settlement with the state by which he admitted no fault however acknowledged the proof in opposition to him. He agreed to pay restitution and never conduct sure varieties of finance-related enterprise in Connecticut once more. On the time, he stated he didn’t come up with the money for to reimburse traders, data present. He later paid two of them $63,000, in accordance with the Banking Division, which declined to say if that was the total quantity Hansmire owed.

“As with most companies, there have been authorized disputes together with the one with the State of Connecticut. These issues have been correctly resolved, closed, and are fully unrelated to the Nationwide Youngster ID Program,” Hansmire informed ProPublica and the Tribune in an emailed assertion.

A public submitting reveals that Hansmire and his spouse had greater than $2 million in excellent tax liens as of October 2022 even after making a $374,000 fee. An IRS spokesperson wouldn’t affirm if that’s how a lot the couple nonetheless owes to the federal authorities, however publicly obtainable data present that not one of the liens had been launched on the time of publication. That normally signifies that they haven’t been paid in full, the spokesperson stated.

Advertisement

Hansmire’s spouse didn’t reply to emailed questions. In his assertion, Hansmire claimed to have “paid money owed completely.” He didn’t present particulars or reply to further questions in regards to the tax liens.

Talking broadly about his authorized and monetary troubles, Hansmire stated: “We stay in a society of second probabilities. My story is not any completely different.”

“A present of security”

Prior to now 4 years, Hansmire has been more and more profitable in securing help from politicians regardless of persistent considerations about whether or not his kits are efficient or mandatory.

He has promoted the kits as a significant little one safety software alongside his former faculty soccer teammate and enterprise companion Mark Salmans and Mike Singletary, an NFL Corridor of Famer who performed for the Chicago Bears.

“Our program enjoys bipartisan help from elected and unelected leaders who agree this can be a present of security that gives dad and mom with the peace of thoughts of understanding they’ll safely retailer many of the info regulation enforcement wants ought to their little one ever go lacking,” Hansmire informed the information organizations.

Advertisement

Salmans didn’t reply to requests for remark or to detailed questions. Singletary declined to remark.

In 2019, the corporate employed lobbyists to push federal laws that will convey in additional enterprise. One measure — filed within the Home by Donald Norcross, a New Jersey Democrat, and within the Senate by Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican — would have allowed the U.S. Division of Justice to award grants to native regulation enforcement businesses to buy little one ID kits.

Twenty Republican attorneys basic, together with Texas’ Ken Paxton and South Carolina’s Alan Wilson, despatched a letter to then-President Donald Trump urging him to help the laws. Within the letter, they famous that “the price for shielding roughly 30 million Okay-6 college students throughout America is slightly below $52 million.”

“Statistics present that greater than 800,000 youngsters go lacking every year together with runaways and people kidnapped. That’s one little one gone each 40 seconds. And we’re seeing these statistics rise together with little one sexual abuse, exploitation and human trafficking,” acknowledged the letter, which was penned by Utah Lawyer Common Sean Reyes.

Texas Lawyer Common Ken Paxton signed on to a letter that urged former President Donald Trump to help federal laws that will make grant cash obtainable to buy the kits. Credit score: Lauren Crow for The Texas Tribune and ProPublica

Finkelhor, the kid security researcher, stated a extra correct quantity to make use of is the FBI’s listing of 30,000 lively instances for lacking youngsters underneath 18, which higher represents cases by which regulation enforcement businesses are working to find them. Even the FBI’s determine, which incorporates runaways, can misrepresent the variety of abductions by which youngsters are damage, killed or taken nice distances by strangers, Finkelhor stated. That quantity is simply over 100 per yr, in accordance with a number of Division of Justice research.

Emails obtained by way of public data requests present that workers members for Reyes and Wilson raised questions both in regards to the 800,000 statistic or the effectiveness of the kits as their states pursued partnerships that prolonged past the help of federal laws.

Advertisement

Reyes’ workers concluded the determine was far too excessive because the Utah lawyer basic moved to arrange a five-year, $1.7 million public-private partnership to offer kits to schoolchildren, in accordance with inner emails. The corporate in the end agreed to take away the quantity from the kits it handed out to oldsters. But Reyes’ workplace included a breakdown of lacking little one statistics that added as much as the determine when it issued a press launch about this system final yr. The workplace didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark.

In South Carolina, a prime staffer for Wilson may discover no proof of the kits’ effectiveness, saying in a June 2021 e mail that investing in them was not an “an eligible or sensible use” of devoted funds for crime victims’ help. Regardless of the conclusion from his workers, Wilson emailed Hansmire the subsequent day to say he was “very ” in partnering with the corporate. Wilson’s workplace efficiently lobbied lawmakers who appropriated $2 million final yr to buy inkless fingerprinting kits. NCIDP was awarded the contract in January.

Wilson didn’t reply to detailed questions.

Staffers for attorneys basic weren’t the one ones warning in regards to the firm because it sought to develop its attain.

In correspondence with members of Congress, the Nationwide Middle for Lacking and Exploited Youngsters criticized using the 800,000 statistic, calling it misguided. The nonprofit questioned why federal lawmakers would direct taxpayer cash towards a particular firm when “extra strong, lower-cost/free kits can be found to the general public.” (The nonprofit, which was created by Congress throughout the Reagan administration as a nationwide clearinghouse for lacking little one instances, is amongst all kinds of entities that present related kits without cost or for a decrease value.)

Advertisement

Whereas pushing again in opposition to federal laws that will particularly direct funding to NCIDP, heart officers stated the corporate’s kits lacked mandatory instructional programming to show younger college students methods to keep away from and extricate themselves from harmful conditions.

“The laws presents a false narrative that if a toddler ID program have been funded by way of state Attorneys Common, little one abduction or runaways wouldn’t exist,” the middle wrote in feedback supplied to lawmakers together with Cruz.

Hansmire informed the information organizations that the nonprofit’s considerations have been “rooted in a funding turf warfare” however gave no particulars. He additionally stated that NCIDP is planning to publish a brand new instructional software package this yr.

Ultimately, the laws didn’t move.

Norcross didn’t reply to detailed written questions.

Advertisement

Darin Miller, a spokesperson for Cruz, pointed to the corporate’s lengthy historical past of help from leaders in Texas and in Washington, D.C., as a cause the senator filed the laws.

The corporate “isn’t a controversial group and little one ID kits will not be a controversial thought,” Miller stated in an announcement. “Senator Cruz was proud to introduce this measure to attempt to assist hold children protected.”

Neither Cruz nor different elected officers whom the information organizations reached out to responded to questions searching for examples of instances by which the kits helped find lacking youngsters.

In an interview with the information organizations final yr and through a number of different public appearances, Hansmire broadly pointed to the case of a runaway woman from Dallas.

When the information organizations reached out to the Dallas Police Division, a spokesperson stated she was unaware of the case and requested for extra info. Reporters returned to Hansmire searching for further particulars to verify the case.

Advertisement

He didn’t present any of the requested particulars, as a substitute responding in an e mail: “My apologies for the issue with the Dallas departments. The anecdote I discussed was a number of years in the past and would have concerned one of many 50+ departments within the Dallas-Fort Price metroplex.”

“A highly regarded merchandise”

Texas leaders have been instrumental in directing tens of millions of {dollars} to Hansmire’s little one ID package enterprise.

A key win got here in 1998, when then-Gov. George W. Bush found the kits at a Texas A&M College soccer sport and, in accordance with Hansmire, requested some for his daughters. Two years later, Texas turned the primary state to distribute the kits to all of its 4 million schoolchildren. Voluntary contributions from varied organizations and particular person donors lined the price, in accordance with Home and Senate resolutions.

After turning into president, Bush was additionally essential in serving to NCIDP land a proper partnership with the FBI to distribute kits throughout the nation, in accordance with Hansmire, who stated the connection ended across the similar time Robert Mueller, a Bush appointee, left the bureau in 2013. Neither Bush nor Mueller might be reached for remark.

Bush is simply one of many Texas politicians who’ve supported Hansmire through the years. Throughout his tenure, former Gov. Rick Perry directed no less than $3 million in public funding to the corporate to buy kits.

Advertisement

The help stopped after Perry, who couldn’t be reached for remark, left workplace to run for president. Then, throughout a committee listening to in April 2021, Texas state Sen. Donna Campbell launched laws that will not solely reestablish funding for the kits however enshrine that dedication in state regulation.

Texas state Sen. Donna Campbell, a New Braunfels Republican, launched laws in 2021 requiring the state to offer inkless little one identification kits to the households of all public elementary and center faculty college students. Credit score: Lauren Crow for The Texas Tribune and ProPublica

Campbell repeated the declare that 800,000 youngsters go lacking yearly whereas touting the significance of this system. “This invoice seeks to assist find the lacking youngsters,” Campbell stated throughout a listening to.

She stated the invoice was delivered to her by Hansmire, Singletary and Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick. She proudly exclaimed that its passage would “make Texas the primary state in the US to legislatively implement this important program.”

Then she urged her colleagues to help the measure, turning to the state’s well-known chorus.

“And what do we are saying?” Campbell, who declined to remark, stated throughout the listening to. “How goes Texas, so goes the nation.”

Nobody spoke publicly in opposition to the measure, however Gary Gates, a Republican state consultant from Richmond, was among the many few dozen lawmakers who voted in opposition to the invoice.

Advertisement

“No one would actually inform me: How are children saved by this?” Gates, a father of 13 youngsters, recalled in an interview.

“This program has been in existence for 20 years,” Gates stated. “If it actually was an efficient program, somebody would have gotten up there and cited statistics.”

The invoice handed with massive majorities within the state Legislature and was signed into regulation that June by Gov. Greg Abbott, who didn’t reply to detailed questions from the information organizations.

The Texas Training Company then scrambled to finalize an settlement to get the kits out amid strain from Patrick’s workplace and a looming package worth enhance that the corporate blamed on its provider, in accordance with emails obtained underneath a Texas Public Info Act request.

“That is for a highly regarded merchandise with the Lt. Gov’s workplace trying over our shoulder,” Patrick McGinnis, a contracts and grants accountability supervisor, wrote in an e mail to colleagues in August 2021. “And time can be of the essence as costs go up quickly which implies about 600,000 much less Texas college students could be served.” McGinnis didn’t reply to a request for remark.

Advertisement

Information present that the training company decided it didn’t must undertake an extended and extra rigorous contracting course of and as a substitute gave NCIDP funding by way of a noncompetitive grant.

Patrick didn’t reply questions associated to the feedback from McGinnis about his involvement. In an announcement to the information organizations, Patrick famous Texas’ lengthy historical past with this system and its broad help base among the many soccer group. He stated the participation of Singletary, the NFL’s former Man of the Yr, gave the corporate credibility. Patrick stated Singletary did many of the speaking when he and Hansmire pitched the kits throughout a gathering in early 2021. He stated he didn’t keep in mind assembly Hansmire beforehand.

“Something we are able to do to hurry the protected return of a lacking little one needs to be a precedence for the state,” Patrick stated.

Hansmire used Texas for instance later that yr whereas talking to attorneys basic as he promoted the optimistic publicity politicians may get for buying the fingerprinting kits.

“We’ve a captured viewers of oldsters and grandparents in our faculty and NFL video games,” he stated throughout a convention.

Advertisement

Then he laid out his plans in Texas. The state, he stated, would distribute 3.6 million little one ID kits. The corporate would give out a ceremonial first package at a Dallas Cowboys sport with Texas’ lawyer basic, Paxton, and the governor in attendance. Ceremonial kits would even be handed out at College of Texas at Austin, Texas A&M and Houston Astros video games, he stated.

“We would like our communities to know the good issues that the AGs are doing, and it doesn’t damage that half one million followers will know that within the nice state of Texas,” Hansmire stated.

Due to pandemic restrictions, none of these ceremonies occurred, in accordance with Hansmire, who stated he didn’t promise Texas officers awards in change for his or her help.

Hansmire honored quite a few politicians for supporting the corporate at an October 2021 Inexperienced Bay Packers sport in Wisconsin. Campbell, Patrick and Paxton have been amongst those that acquired awards.

“As different Texans earlier than me, I used to be targeted on a program that might hold youngsters protected. I used to be not searching for or asking for an award,” Patrick stated.

Advertisement
Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick was a key supporter of laws that paid for the kits. Credit score: Lauren Crow for The Texas Tribune and ProPublica

Campbell and Patrick, who have been searching for reelection on the time, promoted the popularity on their web sites and in newsletters to constituents.

“Promoting false hope”

Per week after the ceremony in Wisconsin, Hansmire set his sights on a much bigger prize.

In conversations with attorneys basic from each events, Hansmire realized that the Washington, D.C.-based Nationwide Affiliation of Attorneys Common was receiving tens of millions of {dollars} in curiosity funds yearly.

The nonpartisan affiliation supplies coaching and advocacy for attorneys basic throughout the nation. Its basis manages greater than $100 million in belongings from a 1998 multistate settlement with the tobacco trade. Curiosity from the fund sometimes goes towards training, analysis and coaching for attorneys basic; enforcement of the settlement; and funding for the affiliation’s packages and initiatives.

Some Republican members of the affiliation have criticized it for accumulating massive sums of settlement cash that they argue needs to be distributed to particular person states.

Hansmire informed the information organizations that he had discussions with attorneys basic by which they thought-about whether or not the affiliation may use a few of that cash to assist pay for the kits.

Advertisement

On Nov. 1, 2021, Louisiana Lawyer Common Jeff Landry requested that the affiliation’s government committee put aside time at its subsequent assembly to discover how “sources” might be used to help Hansmire’s firm, explaining that “$9 million would fund a Youngster ID Equipment for each kindergarten pupil in America.”

No member had ever made a request that giant and far much less one to help an outdoor group, prompting Chris Toth, then the affiliation’s government director, to ask that workers to look into the corporate.

Two weeks after Landry’s request, Hansmire reached out to the president of the affiliation, Washington, D.C., Lawyer Common Karl Racine. Racine, who had attended the Inexperienced Bay Packers sport the earlier month, is pictured holding an award alongside different attorneys basic. In an e mail, Hansmire supplied to host a reception in Racine’s honor with Singletary and varied different former NFL gamers who have been going to be there lobbying for federal laws in help of the corporate.

A staffer for Racine declined the invitation every week earlier than Landry made his pitch to the affiliation’s government committee.

At a Dec. 6, 2021, assembly, Landry proposed a grant program that will enable company sponsors to match the affiliation’s contributions. Draft minutes from the assembly, which have been obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune by way of a public data request, say that Landry wished committee members to know what the corporate “will have the ability to do for the attorneys basic. AG Landry states that there ‘needs to be a quid professional quo.’”

Advertisement

It’s unclear what Landry meant by “quid professional quo.” Neither Landry nor Racine, who has since left workplace, responded to requests for remark.

The phrase, nevertheless, didn’t seem within the ultimate model of the assembly minutes. That’s as a result of Landry requested that or not it’s eliminated, Toth stated.

As the chief committee thought-about Landry’s request, affiliation staffers started gathering details about the corporate and Hansmire that they thought-about troubling, together with the 2015 Connecticut settlement, particulars of that are simply discovered on the state Banking Division’s web site.

As a part of its inquiry, affiliation workers reached out to the FBI to ask in regards to the company’s relationship with NCIDP. On its web site, the corporate claims to promote the one package to have partnered with and been accepted by the FBI.

In an e mail responding to the inquiries from the affiliation’s workers, FBI lawyer Thomas Aldridge stated that the company was now not related to NCIDP and that any mentions of the FBI needs to be faraway from the corporate’s web site. Neither the FBI nor Aldridge would remark.

Advertisement

“Nobody ought to depend upon statements made on the web site as FBI endorsement, partnership, or approval for that group or its merchandise,” Aldridge wrote within the e mail obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune.

For his half, Hansmire stated NCIDP’s web site doesn’t “replicate a present partnership” however somewhat a “historic relationship.”

Workers members of the attorneys basic affiliation accomplished their analysis and supplied a report back to the chair of the committee weighing the request for funding. At a Feb. 16, 2022, assembly, the board determined in opposition to the grant for NCIDP.

“Whereas AGs overwhelmingly supported the request, NAAG workers didn’t wish to lose management of how they spent the cash,” Hansmire stated in a written assertion. He claimed that criticisms of his firm largely stem from “the biased opinions of a former staffer of a nationwide group.” He did reply to questions on who he was referring to or how the particular person was biased.

Landry, who additionally acquired a duplicate of the workers’s findings, didn’t quit.

Advertisement

9 months after the affiliation turned down his request, he introduced that his workplace, together with the Louisiana Sheriff’s Affiliation, was getting into a partnership with NCIDP to offer kits to Louisiana college students. Non-public companions would pay for the kits, in accordance with his workplace.

At an Oct. 21 press convention asserting the partnership, Hansmire known as Landry, who had declared a bid for Louisiana governor just a few weeks earlier, “one of many prime leaders on this nation.”

Landry is one among no less than 5 attorneys basic who’ve begun partnerships with the corporate previously yr. That’s disappointing, stated Toth, who retired final yr after 18 years on the affiliation.

“Anybody can spend 20 minutes on the web and understand there’s something fishy about this man,” Toth stated in an interview. “I used to be flabbergasted that Hansmire was working this manner for thus lengthy, with out anyone calling it out.”

“What actually bothers me is he’s making a buck off of promoting false hope,” he added. “This isn’t going to guard any youngsters.”

Advertisement

Lexi Churchill contributed reporting.

Disclosure: Baylor College, Pearson, Texas A&M College and College of Texas at Austin have been monetary supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan information group that’s funded partially by donations from members, foundations and company sponsors. Monetary supporters play no position within the Tribune’s journalism. Discover a full listing of them right here.


We are able to’t wait to welcome you Sept. 21-23 to the 2023 Texas Tribune Competition, our multiday celebration of massive, daring concepts about politics, public coverage and the day’s information — all happening simply steps away from the Texas Capitol. When tickets go on sale in Could, Tribune members will save large. Donate to hitch or renew at the moment.

This text initially appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/08/kenny-hansmire-persuades-politicians-to-fund-child-id-kits/.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and interesting Texans on state politics and coverage. Study extra at texastribune.org.

Advertisement



Source link

South-Carolina

Staff Picks: South Carolina at Clemson, other Week 14 rivalry matchups

Published

on

Staff Picks: South Carolina at Clemson, other Week 14 rivalry matchups


The wait is almost over. At long last, rivalry weekend is upon us.

In what will be one of the biggest games of the weekend, No. 15 South Carolina will travel to the upstate to face No. 12 Clemson for the Palmetto Bowl. Kickoff is at noon on ESPN on Saturday.

The GamecockCentral and 107.5 The Game staffs shared their predictions for the game between the Gamecocks and Tigers as well as other Week 14 matchups from around the country. 

[GamecockCentral: Subscribe for $1 for 7 days]

Advertisement

George Bagwell: I think this is a bad matchup for Clemson. They’re not working with a great offensive line while they face an elite defensive front. They just gave up 288 rushing yards to The Citadel, the most against a Clemson defense since Georgia in 2014, and now they’re facing a highly efficient run-based offense in South Carolina. South Carolina 38, Clemson 20.

Peyton Butt: This could honestly go either way so making a prediction was a challenge. Clemson has struggled with some injuries thus far but the two are pretty evenly matched. I think the game being at Clemson will be a huge advantage and boost for the Tigers. Gamecock defense will have to put pressure on Cade Klubnik fast but I think Klubnik’s accuracy and consistency will be a problem for the Gamecocks. Clemson 45, South Carolina 28.

Elijah Campbell: It’s one of the most highly anticipated games in the history of this great rivalry and for the first time since I was in high school, I really feel like this Gamecocks team will go into Clemson and win. Shane Beamer said that forcing turnovers is a must and I agree. I also see the Kennard and Stewart edge rushing combo working perfectly to force one of the key turnovers as well as keeping Clemson’s rushing attack at bay. Give me the Gamecocks in a thriller! South Carolina 21, Clemson 17.

Chris Clark: I think this South Carolina team is battle-tested and will have an advantage at the line of scrimmage on defense. I expect a competitive game, but I’m taking the Gamecocks to get it done on the road. South Carolina 27, Clemson 20.

Terry Ford: USC wins a tight one on the road. The way the Gamecocks offense has come on to go along with one of the best defenses in America make Carolina tough to beat. Plus, USC has been real good on the road all year. Stat to file away…ESPN SP+ Special Teams Rankings Nationally: Gamecocks 42nd…Tigers 109th. South Carolina 23, Clemson 20.

Advertisement

Griffin Goodwyn: Recent history would say that the Gamecocks are expected to struggle when they head to Memorial Stadium on Saturday. South Carolina has lost three of its last four road matchups against Clemson, and those three defeats were by a combined 88 points. But the Gamecocks’ last trip to the Tigers’ home stadium was a different story, as they claimed a 31-30 victory facing long odds as an unranked team looking to take down a top-10 squad with College Football Playoff aspirations. The postseason stakes are higher for both teams in this year’s Palmetto Bowl, and so is the possibility of an upset. South Carolina is in the midst of a five-game win streak — and is in prime position for a sixth-straight victory. South Carolina 28, Clemson 27.

[On3 App: Get South Carolina push notifications from GamecockCentral]

Tyler Head: High stakes game. Gamecocks have to slow down the Tigers rushing attack. I think Sellers has another star making performance. South Carolina 34, Clemson 31.

Wes Mitchell: South Carolina’s defensive line has carried it all season long and I don’t think that will stop this week, especially against a Clemson offensive line that has been banged up. The key will be can the Gamecocks protect the football, not let the moment be too big, and just do what they do otherwise. South Carolina 31, Clemson 21.

Jay Philips: Here we are, a Carolina/Clemson game that really matters for both teams beyond the daily rivalry. The Gamecocks are playing some of the best football in the country and will feel no fear in traveling to Memorial Stadium this weekend. Based on their form I think Carolina is the slightly better team, and if they continue on their current path they should win this game. In a tense contest give me South Carolina 30, Clemson 23.

Advertisement

Kendall Smith: I could write a long paragraph about why I am going with this final score, but all I’m going to say is I think this game belongs to the Gamecocks if they play to their potential. South Carolina 27, Clemson 23.

Mike Uva: Two teams with strong defenses who have QBs who have improved throughout the year. This should be an instant classic, especially with the college football playoff hopes hovering both these teams. South Carolina 20, Clemson 17. 

Jack Veltri: I’ve said it since the summer that South Carolina would beat Clemson this year, and that was before any of us knew the Gamecocks would be where they are today. I still feel they’re going to get the job done. They’ve faced all kinds of adversity this season and handled it well. The key here will be to take care of the football on offense and the defense creates takeaways. South Carolina 34, Clemson 28.

[Get our free newsletter! Don’t rely on search engines and social media for your Gamecock info.]

Chris Wellbaum: Which quarterback do you trust against which defense? Both teams will try to lean on their run game, and the defense that can force some turnovers will win the game. Clemson 31, South Carolina 16.

Advertisement

Kevin Miller: In one of the most anticipated matchups in recent rivalry history, South Carolina and Clemson are both ranked and holding on to slight hope for the College Football Playoff. The Gamecocks have played better than the Tigers in recent weeks, but the game is in the Upstate. In classic rivalry fashion, this game could come down to the football cliches: turnovers, 3rd-down conversions, and explosive plays. Give me the Gamecocks in a tight one: South Carolina 27, Clemson 24.

Tennessee at Vanderbilt Michigan at Ohio State (The Game) Auburn at Alabama (Iron Bowl) Notre Dame at Southern Cal (The Battle for the Jeweled Shilleagh) Oklahoma at LSU Texas at Texas A&M (Lonestar Showdown) Marshall at James Madison Virginia at Virginia Tech (The Commonwealth Clash)
George Bagwell (63-54) Vanderbilt Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas  James Madison Virginia Tech 
Peyton Butt (63-54) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame Oklahoma Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Elijah Campbell (76-41) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas A&M Marshall Virginia Tech
Chris Clark (66-51) Vanderbilt Ohio State Alabama Southern Cal Oklahoma Texas A&M Marshall Virginia Tech
Terry Ford (83-33) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas A&M James Madison Virginia
Griffin Goodwyn (81-36) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Tyler Head (66-51) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas A&M James Madison Virginia Tech
Wes Mitchell (78-39) Vanderbilt Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Jay Philips (75-42) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Kendall Smith (68-49) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Mike Uva (76-41) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Jack Veltri (78-39) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas Marshall Virginia Tech
Chris Wellbaum (63-54) Vanderbilt Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech
Kevin Miller (50-22) Tennessee Ohio State Alabama Notre Dame LSU Texas James Madison Virginia Tech



Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

College Football Picks: Expert Predictions For Texas-Texas A&M, South Carolina-Clemson, Kansas State-Iowa St.

Published

on

College Football Picks: Expert Predictions For Texas-Texas A&M, South Carolina-Clemson, Kansas State-Iowa St.


Rivalry week is upon us, and all eyes will be on College Station, Texas, as No. 3 Texas and No. 20 Texas A&M for the first time since 2011. This one is even bigger than expected as the winner will move on to play Georgia in the SEC Championship Game. The Longhorns will likely stay in the College Football Playoff bracket if they lose, but the Aggies almost certainly are in a CFP do-or-die situation.

Kansas State and Iowa State will tee it up in Ames, and South Carolina will head upstate to take on Clemson in games that, very quietly, can still impact the CFP race.

Here are the picks from Outkick writers Trey Wallace and Barrett Sallee, who are tied in straight up and against the spread heading into the biggest weekend of the season. Keep in mind, winners against the spread in the wild card games are worth two points in our completely made-up game.

Advertisement

Trey: 38-14 straight up, 27-25 against the spread (29 points)

Barrett: 38-14 straight up, 27-25 against the spread (29 points)

Texas (-5.5) at Texas A&M

Wallace: Thank goodness this rivalry has returned after 13 years. I don’t know what type of wakeup call Texas A&M needed last week in Auburn, but they got it. Now, the Aggies still control their destiny, but so do the Longhorns, and I expect their offense to cause the opposing defense some problems. I think this one comes down to the fourth quarter, and Texas A&M finds a way to win this game late, something they couldn’t do last week against the Tigers

SalleeGive me the Longhorns to win – and do it by double digits. I don’t care that their quarterback situation is in flux because both Quinn Ewers and Arch Manning are capable of getting the job done against an Aggies bunch that has to be down in the dumps after last week’s quadruple overtime loss at Auburn. Expect Texas’ defense to have its best performance of the season.

Advertisement

Kansas State at Iowa State (-2.5)

Wallace: Another wild game in the Big 12 awaits, as both teams still fight for a spot in the championship game, thanks to some wild tiebreaker rules. While this feels like a game for Avery Johnson to flourish at quarterback for Kansas State, I think Iowa State’s Rocco Becht could be the one that comes out on top. Even though the Wildcats have only given up more than 20 points just once in the last 5 games, this is the Cyclones day. 

Iowa State wins, and covers. 

Sallee: I’m a big Avery Johnson fan, and he will show you why in what will be a win for the Wildcats en route to the Big 12 Championship Game. He’s healthy again, which means that they will unleash a punishing rushing attack against a Cyclones defense that hasn’t fared well stopping the run.

South Carolina at Clemson (-3)

Wallace: This one should be a lot of fun. Both offenses have been playing well, but its the Gamecocks defense that continues to amaze me at times. I would argue that South Carolina is playing some of the best football in the SEC right now/ For Clemson, they are fighting for a spot in the college football playoff as well, which adds so much more fuel to this game. This one comes down to Tocket Sanders running the ball for the Gamecocks, and Clemson QB Cade Klubnik tossing a few interceptions. 

I’m going with the Gamecocks to win the game. 

Advertisement

Sallee: The Gamecocks are one of the hottest teams in the country, and still have an outside chance at making the CFP. However, it needs to win and have several dominoes fall around the country. Expect coach Shane Beamer to unleash a monster rushing attack with quarterback LaNorris Sellars and running back Rocket Sanders, and the defensive front to rattle Tigers quarterback Cade Klubnik.

Wild Card Games

Notre Dame (-7.5) at USC

Honestly, I have no idea why this is a single-digit spread. I call Notre Dame the “best, most boring team in the country” because the Fighting Irish casually go about their business bludgeoning their opponents until they say “mercy.” That will happen on Saturday against a broken Trojans team that has been a massive disappointment.

Auburn @ Alabama (-11.5)

The Tigers have the momentum entering this game, but Alabama is still playing for a potential spot in the college football playoff. So, what gives on Saturday afternoon? If Auburn can follow the same defensive plan as Oklahoma, who upset Alabama last week, then maybe they can cause Jalen Milroe to give up the ball a few times. If not, and they let Jalen make plays outside the pocket, it could be a long day for Auburn. 

I don’t know if I trust Payton Thorne to win this game for Auburn, but I do trust Jarquez Hunter to run the ball. I think Alabama wins, but the Tigers cover. 

Alright, that will do it for this week’s picks. Email your thoughts about the weekend to Trey.Wallace@OutKick.com

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Dawn Staley shares how South Carolina has responded since loss

Published

on

Dawn Staley shares how South Carolina has responded since loss


South Carolina had its run of 43 straight wins come to an end this past Sunday as Dawn Staley and the Gamecocks suffered a 77-62 loss at UCLA.

Staley said after the loss and ahead of the matchup with Iowa State on Thursday that she thought her team would respond the right way. Needless to say the Gamecocks did against Iowa State, pounding the Cyclones 76-36 on Thanksgiving Day.

“That’s what a team does. This is a resilient group,” Dawn Staley said. “This is a team that obviously hasn’t dealt with a whole lot of losing. It’ll shake you for a moment.

“We’ve got a 24-hour rule. Bask in the glory of a defeat and you handle a defeat. And you handle it with grace, but you handle it with learning lessons. Things were exposed and hopefully we can fill some of those holes and get back to happier times.”

Advertisement

It was certainly a happier time for South Carolina on Thursday. The Gamecocks led Iowa State 19-3 at the end of the first quarter and 35-9 at halftime.

South Carolina went on a 32-0 run at one point in the first half and easily handled an Iowa State team that was ranked No. 15 nationally.

Dawn Staley said ahead of the game that she wanted her team to play better offensively and it did. South Carolina shot 45.3 percent from the floor against Iowa State after connecting on only 36.4 percent of its attempts against UCLA.

“Our offense, just getting better looks and getting better ball movement,” Dawn Staley said of where South Carolina needed to improve. “The ball has been sticking too much to individual players and it’s stagnant.

“We need to get our bigs involved, so we’re going to look to get them involved in positions they can score, whether that’s two feet in the paint or hitting mid-range shots. If you’ve got 3-point range, you can take good, fluid, rhythm 3s.”

Advertisement

South Carolina relied on a balanced scoring attack against Iowa State as senior forward Sania Feagin and freshman forward Joyce Edwards led the way with 13 points each.

The Gamecocks will be back in action on Saturday when they face Purdue in Fort Meyers, Florida. Tip off is set for 11 a.m.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending