South-Carolina
How Shane Beamer’s first 3 South Carolina seasons are better, worse than Steve Spurrier, Will Muschamp
COLUMBIA — South Carolina football coach Shane Beamer signed a two-year extension to become the highest-paid coach in program history in January, but the third-year coach is at a potential crossroads in 2023.
The Gamecocks (2-5, 1-4 SEC) are off to their worst start since Will Muschamp’s midseason firing during the pandemic-shortened 2020 season. The team’s last start worse than 2-5 excluding that outlier was in 1999 when it went 0-11 in the ACC.
South Carolina has not had a 10-win season since legendary former coach Steve Spurrier, who led three consecutive 11-2 seasons from 2011 through 2013 and brought the Gamecocks their lone SEC East championship in 2010. However, the winningest coach in program history ended on a sour note, resigning six games into the 2015 season after an 0-4 start in conference play.
There’s a portion of the South Carolina fan base now questioning whether Beamer is the future of the program as reaching the six-win bowl eligibility threshold looks increasingly unlikely in 2023. Here’s how Beamer’s first three seasons compare to Muschamp and Spurrier, and how their tenures should shape Beamer’s expectations.
Shane Beamer’s first two years vs Steve Spurrier, Will Muschamp
There’s no question Beamer overachieved in his first two years, elevating South Carolina from 2-8 under Muschamp in 2020 to a 6-6 regular season in 2021 and a win in the Duke’s Mayo Bowl over North Carolina. The Gamecocks catapulted into a national spotlight thanks to back-to-back upsets of No. 5 Tennessee and No. 8 Clemson at the end of 2022. The eight-win regular season gave South Carolina a berth to the Gator Bowl and its highest ranking from the College Football Playoff since it was established in 2014.
Spurrier also made bowl games in his first two years and had the same record as Beamer, losing to Missouri in the 2005 Independence Bowl then beating Houston in the 2006 Liberty Bowl. Even Spurrier’s records were quite similar to Beamer’s, going 7-5 in his first year and 8-5 in his second. He performed slightly better in the SEC with an 8-8 record over his first two seasons to Beamer’s 7-9.
Muschamp is not fondly remembered at South Carolina, but he had arguably a better start to his tenure than either Spurrier or Beamer. He matched Beamer’s Year 1 regular season at 6-6, though a loss to South Florida in the Birmingham Bowl put him just below .500. The Gamecocks then went 9-4 in 2017 thanks to a win over Michigan in the Outback Bowl, and that remains the team’s winningest season since Spurrier went 11-2 in 2013. Muschamp’s 2017 team finished second in the SEC East, matching Spurrier’s standing in 2005.
Comparing 2023 slump to Spurrier, Muschamp worst seasons
Spurrier also had a downturn in his third season like the one Beamer is currently experiencing, so it’s fair to assume their are factors beyond leadership at play in the transition process contributing to the Gamecocks’ 2023 skid. Spurrier went 6-6 in 2007, his worst record excluding the incomplete 2015 season. It was the only year he did not bring South Carolina to a bowl game and marked his worst finish in the SEC East at No. 5.
Muschamp’s worst season was undoubtedly the one that got him fired in 2020, but his least-successful complete season was the year prior in 2019. The Gamecocks went 4-8 overall and 3-5 in the SEC during a bizarre season in which they lost to unranked Missouri and Tennessee by 20 points but upset No. 3 Georgia in Athens in two overtimes. Muschamp, now the Georgia defensive coordinator, remains the most recent coach to beat the Bulldogs at home.
It’s possible that South Carolina finishes below Muschamp’s worst record this season. The Gamecocks won’t be favored in another SEC matchup besides Vanderbilt, and Jacksonville State looks like the only other likely victory. However, it’s unwise to count out South Carolina’s upset potential under Beamer with both Kentucky and Clemson looking vulnerable in the final two weeks of the year. Just an upset of Clemson would largely appease the fan base, regardless of the team’s final win total.
WEEK 9 INJURY REPORT: South Carolina football injury report: How offensive line losses impacting Texas A&M game
How Shane Beamer’s recruiting progress compares
The area in which Beamer consistently outpaces both Spurrier and Muschamp is recruiting. After inheriting the No. 80 freshman class in the country from Muschamp in 2021, Beamer’s 2022 class climbed to No. 24 in the 247Sports Composite and reached the program’s highest ranking since 2012 at No. 16 with the 2023 class. Though there is still a long way until the early signing period opens in December, the Gamecocks’ 2024 class ranks No. 18 nationally and includes five-star commitment from out of state for the second consecutive year. Beamer signed Washington, D.C., native Nyck Harbor in 2023 and expects to add D.C. edge rusher Dylan Stewart in 2024.
The recruiting landscape is wildly different than when Spurrier started at South Carolina in 2005, and even when Muschamp was hired in 2018, but Beamer has thrived in the rapidly shifting environment. Spurrier had the benefit of an in-state prospect ranked No. 1 in the country, landing Rock Hill native Jadeveon Clowney in 2011. Spurrier’s recruiting was wildly inconsistent, going from the No. 6 class in 2007 to the No. 34 class in 2008. The 2007 class was his only one inside the top 10, and he only had consecutive top-18 classes once over 10 seasons, in 2011 and 2012.
Muschamp inherited the No. 25 class from Spurrier when he was hired in 2016, a drastically better group than what Beamer was left with. He had his first top-20 class in Year 3 at No. 18 and had the No. 19 class in 2020. Muschamp didn’t pull elite talent as early as Beamer has, landing his first five-star prospect in 2019. Both five-star signees of his tenure, Zacch Pickens and Jordan Burch, were in-state players, and Burch was from Columbia.
Follow South Carolina football beat reporter Emily Adams on X @eaadams6 and subscribe to The Greenville News for exclusive Gamecocks content: https://subscribe.greenvilleonline.com/offers.
Get the latest news and insight on SEC football by subscribing to the SEC Unfiltered newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.
South-Carolina
The Verdict: South Carolina was built for this moment
South Carolina football superfan Chris Paschal writes a weekly column during the season for GamecockCentral called “The Verdict.” Chris is a lawyer at Goings Law Firm in Columbia.
It will have been 44,592 days since Clemson students marched onto our campus with guns drawn when the Gamecocks take the field this Saturday in Death Valley. Back in 1902, Clemson students were mad because of a cartoon that depicted a Gamecock whipping a Tiger.
They marched on our campus, ready to cause bodily harm, over a cartoon. For 44,592 days, Clemson students, fans, coaches, players, and administrators have done everything but declare war on South Carolina to ensure they remain the superior football program in the state.
In 1902 there was more than just the cartoon. In 1902, Carolina beat Clemson.
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution put it best following the game: the Clemson Tiger “was so successfully tamed this morning by Carolina. Its tail was twisted and twisted by the sturdy ‘pig skin pushers’ of Carolina, and after two hours and more of hard battle it gave up further fight, for time was called and it became as tame as the proverbial lamb.”
Carolina upset Clemson who at the time was led by John Heisman and was considered one of the great southern football powers. I think that too probably had a little something to do with the hostilities and hurt feelings coming from the Clemson students.
[GamecockCentral: Subscribe for $1 for 7 days]
For the 121st time this Saturday, it will be Carolina and Clemson playing a football game against each other. And while we are past the days of armed invasions, you can’t help but think this Saturday’s showdown may be the most consequential in the series’ history.
There have certainly been big matchups in years past. I am not discounting 1987. I am not overlooking 1979. I understand 2011-2013 featured some great teams. But this coming Saturday, both Clemson and Carolina will still be alive and in contention to bring home a national title.
The chances for both are not significant, but they are legitimate. For the first time in the entirety of the rivalry’s history, both Carolina and Clemson fans can hope that with a win over their hated rival they are one step closer to a playoff berth, which means one more step closer in the quest for a national championship.
Hopefully, the players donning the garnet and black won’t think similar thoughts as they run out onto the field for what should be a cold but sunny day. This game to the players needs to be about one thing: beating a team they are better than.
In continuing the list of firsts, for the first time in roughly a decade, South Carolina will have what I consider to be the better football team when they kick the ball off against Clemson. I think we have a better defense, I think we have a better offensive line, I think we have skill position players that are just as good as Clemson’s (if not better), and I think we have the better quarterback.
But that is what I think. I am an attorney. I am a fan. Clemson players won’t just roll over because I declared we have the better team. In fact, I expect this Dabo Swinney-led Clemson football team to fight like hell in an effort to keep their thumb still firmly on top of us.
Like Clemson fans, I think Clemson football players and coaches also think it is their birthright to beat the Gamecocks. And why shouldn’t they?
Clemson has won eight out of the last nine against Carolina. They have danced on our sidelines in the fourth quarter to Sandstorm, they have talked about how they think they will dominate us; they have talked about how we aren’t the real USC nor are we the real Carolina.
Underneath this façade of respect and admiration for this year’s Carolina team, Clemson fans (and I assume players) quietly assume 2024 will be just like most other recent years. They assume the moment will be too big, they assume the ghosts of years past will be too much, and they assume that by about 3:30 in the afternoon, Carolina will have once again not been physically or mentally strong enough to defeat Clemson.
[Get our free newsletter! Don’t rely on search engines and social media for your Gamecock info.]
But I also think these assumptions, which often manifest themself in a holier-than-thou arrogance, stem from a small shred of doubt and fear that has crept into their minds. Carolina fans had no idea Clemson was passing the Gamecocks as a football program until it was too late. From 2009-2013, Carolina won five straight over Clemson. They assumed Clemson and their bumpkin coach were finally second fiddle to the Gamecocks. They ignored Clemson’s recruiting successes, they explained away Clemson’s double-digit win seasons as illegitimate due to being in the ACC, and they watched Clemson build a juggernaut that had passed Carolina in a very real and lasting way by 2014.
All it took was one whipping in 2014 for Carolina fans to realize that Clemson was now on a path that would destroy Gamecock hopes and dreams for many years to come. That feeling of “oh, crap” that Carolina fans felt in the few weeks leading up to the 2014 Clemson games, I wonder if Clemson fans are feeling that very same thing leading up to this Saturday’s game.
Maybe the thought of Carolina passing Clemson as a program hasn’t even crossed their minds. Maybe it is absurd that I would mention that in this column. Maybe by the final snap on Saturday, Clemson will have soundly defeated Carolina and made me and so many hopeful Gamecock fans look foolish.
Or maybe Harbor, Kennard, Stewart, Hemingway, Sanders, Knight, Emmanwori, Sellers, and so many other Gamecock stalwarts are capable of handling business and showing we do have the better team.
A win this weekend could be program defining. It at the very least could be season defining.
Is Shane Beamer and this Gamecock program always a bridesmaid but never the bride? Or is this team going to let this state and this nation understand that this is a new type of Gamecock football program?
We won’t know until Saturday, but I will be in Clemson cheering Carolina on, with the hope – the belief – that we will see that latter. Let’s tame the tiger once again into the proverbial lamb.
Forever to thee.
South-Carolina
Warde Manuel discusses how Clemson-South Carolina winner could see College Football Playoff resume boosted
Ranked No. 12, Clemson is just on the outside looking in at the College Football Playoff. But the Tigers could help their case on Saturday.
Hosting in-state rival and No. 15 ranked South Carolina, Clemson could notch a very meaningful win. And on top of being the best win the Tigers would have notched all season, it would be a strong final argument to make for the selection committee — assuming Clemson doesn’t back into the ACC title game.
While he didn’t comment on specifics of a hypothetical, CFP selection committee chair Warde Manuel acknowledged a win would surely help Clemson’s case to snag an at-large bid, when asked directly about the Tigers.
“I’ll continue to say we don’t look forward and we don’t project, but winning always helps. I will say that,” Manuel said. “When teams win, we value what they do. I don’t know what that would mean towards where they will be in projecting, but there is value in winning games.”
And it’s a boost that could cut both ways. As much as a win could help Clemson, it could be equally valuable to South Carolina as the Gamecocks try to get in position for an improbable at-large bid, one that would require some chaos ahead in the rankings.
Manuel also explained why Clemson slotted at No. 12 ahead of a cadre of SEC teams.
With Clemson slotted in at No. 12 in the latest College Football Playoff rankings, ahead of the likes of Alabama and Ole Miss, the decision of skeptics, despite the Tigers having a slightly better win-loss record.
Both the Crimson Tide and Rebels are 8-3, but have arguably better resumes than Clemson, which lacks many big wins. Nevertheless, the selection committee found the Tigers resume to be just enough to put them ahead, according to Manuel.
“Well, Clemson slid up with some losses ahead of them by Alabama and Mississippi, and they had a win against Citadel, obviously, but that wasn’t the big reason,” Manuel said. “Obviously they’re at 9-2, with only two losses. The teams right behind them have three losses. We just felt as a committee as we looked at their body of work, with three straight wins after their loss to Louisville, including back-to-back wins against Virginia Tech and Pitt, that they deserved to move up into that 12th position.”
Manuel also discussed how the committee came to the decision to delineate Alabama and Ole Miss as the No. 13 and No. 14 teams, respectively.
Three SEC teams – Alabama, Ole Miss and South Carolina – have three losses, and all eyes were on where they’d come in during the fourth rankings reveal.
Ultimately, Alabama came in as the highest-ranked of the group at No. 13, followed by Ole Miss at No. 14 and South Carolina at No. 15. According to Manuel, that decision was largely due to head-to-head matchups.
Manuel said the Crimson Tide’s resume – which includes wins over Georgia, Missouri and LSU – was a separator in the committee’s decision. But since Alabama and Ole Miss both have wins over South Carolina, that led them to come in at 13, 14 and 15, respectively.
South-Carolina
Shane Beamer updates injuries going into Clemson game
For the first time really all year, South Carolina football is facing some injury questions. Wide reciever Jared Brown, tight ends Joshua Simon and Michael Smith all missed the Wofford game last week, forcing the Gamecocks to change up their approach offensively and play with one or no tight ends all day.
On Tuesday afternoon at his weekly press conference, Shane Beamer updated the injury sitution going into Saturday’s game at Clemson.
Regarding Brown, Beamer said “he’ll be fine” and confirmed the Coastal Carolina transfer will play in his first rivalry game this weekend. Wide reciever Vandrevius Jacobs on the other hand is out this weekend with a hamstring injury he suffered against Wofford.
Beamer did not have a further update on either of the tight ends, simply saying “we’ll see” with regards to Simon and Smith.
************************************************************************
Looking to continue the conversation? Join us on the insider’s forum to talk all things South Carolina football.
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health4 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
Health2 days ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World