Connect with us

South-Carolina

Everything Mark Kingston said after South Carolina's game one win over Florida

Published

on

Everything Mark Kingston said after South Carolina's game one win over Florida


Following South Carolina’s 10-3 win over Florida on Friday, head coach Mark Kingston spoke to the media. Here’s what he had to say.

On if the ninth inning rally can carry over

“I mean, again, you’re only as good as your next game. But today was a really good game. And it was punctuated by that last inning. It was a two-run ballgame. And you knew that the lineup for them was flipping over and Caglianone would be coming up. You just hope he wasn’t going to have the opportunity to be the tying run. So the fact that we were able to put up those runs late really allowed us to relax a little more in the bottom of the ninth.”

On Cole Messina hitting leadoff tonight and playing well

Advertisement

“Well, that was what the hope was. You’ve seen a lot of big strong guys in 2024 in modern baseball. Teams are going that way with the leadoff hitter. Here last year, Wyatt Langford did it for them, and he’s already in the big leagues. Schwarber’s done it, Judge has done it, Mike Trout does it. Again, we’re trying to find that the best version of ourselves. And until we find it and feel that we found it, we’re going to keep trying things. So we tried it today and it was a good look. There’s no question it was a good look today.”

[GamecockCentral for $1: In-depth coverage and a great community]

On keeping the faith in Will Tippett’s offense

“We made an adjustment in terms of just saying he’s going to hit right-handed the rest of the way. And you saw why. He has the ability to change the game like that if he can make contact. So that was really good for him and his confidence, I think. And that will help him. It’s good for us just to see that he’s capable of doing it.”

On Eli Jones’ outing

Advertisement

“He made some adjustments. A lot of times, he’s fastball-change and then a curveball-slider are kind of third pitches today. He featured the curveball and the slider. I think it shows that he can make adjustments based on who we’re facing and the kind of hitters he’s facing. So he bounced back. It’s the first thing I told the team in the postgame is Eli just showed what this thing’s all about. You have a tough week last week and you bounce back this week. It just shows that he has a heart of a champion.”

On taking Jones out after six innings of work

“Well, it was a very close game. And we’ve been burned a few times this year by trying to get more out of guys. We have confidence in our bullpen right now. And I think we need to hand the ball off to a guy a pitch too early rather than a pitch too late.”

On the decision to pitch to Caglianone in the seventh with a base open

“Well, there were two outs, you have a four run lead, you don’t invite another run with a 15 home run guy on deck. If that’s a two-run ballgame, you have a decision to make. Four-run ballgame, there was no decision to be made. The guy hit a homer, but we still had a two-run lead. And you don’t invite more runs when you’re up by four in that situation.”

Advertisement

[On3 App: Get South Carolina push notifications from GamecockCentral]

On being more aggressive early in the count against Brandon Neely

“We knew he was the closer for them, and we were going to try to get his pitch count up. By the same token, he was going to get ahead of us with that fastball. So we want to be more aggressive. But we also want to take types of swings that allow us to have success. I thought we took more swings that were shorter and quicker and much compact tonight, especially in RBI situations. And I think that’s why you saw score 10 runs and had 13 hits.”

On if the conversation about approach involved shorter and more compact swings

“We’ve been stressing it for a while. But sometimes, they just need to see it work and see it really quick to know how important that is. I mean, it’s always been an emphasis. Long swings just don’t work in RBI situations. But sometimes it just clicks there.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

South-Carolina

Switzerland's Nemo wins Eurovision 2024 in a year of protests

Published

on

Switzerland's Nemo wins Eurovision 2024 in a year of protests


Switzerland has won this year’s Eurovision Song Contest. Swiss rapper and singer Nemo’s song “The Code” impressed both the jury and the public at the popular annual event, held Saturday in Malmö, Sweden.

“It is the most insane thing that has ever happened to me,” the 24-year-old vocalist said at the post-event press conference.

“The Code” explores the artist’s nonbinary identity in a flamboyant mashup of opera, rap, drum-and-bass and electronic dance music.

Nemo was one one of two nonbinary singers to compete in the Eurovision Grand Finals this year, along with Ireland’s Bambie Thug.

Advertisement

Switzerland narrowly beat pre-competition favorite Croatia — earning 591 votes compared with the runner-up’s 547 — in an event that was not without controversy.

Security was tight for Israel’s entrant, Eden Golan. She received some boos and turned backs during her performance but placed high at the event, coming in 5th with 375 votes.

Thousands of protesters opposed to Israel’s war in Gaza rallied outside the Malmö Arena in the days leading up to the finals, calling for Israel’s disqualification.

Meanwhile, Dutch contestant Joost Klein was disqualified just hours before the finals began over a complaint lodged by a female production team member. Police said they are investigating.

Advertisement

Switzerland took first place at the very first Eurovision Song Contest in 1956. Until now, the country has only won one other time — in 1988. The top entry that year, “Ne Partez Pas Sans Moi,” was performed by a then-little-known (and non-Swiss) singer who would go on to become one of the most successful vocalists of all time: Céline Dion.

Copyright 2024 NPR





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Former Iowa star Kate Martin rocked Gamecocks gear for Aces teammate A'Ja Wilson ahead of preseason game in South Carolina

Published

on

Former Iowa star Kate Martin rocked Gamecocks gear for Aces teammate A'Ja Wilson ahead of preseason game in South Carolina


With news that Las Vegas Aces superstar A’Ja Wilson is finally getting her own Nike shoe, some of her Aces teammates rocked South Carolina gear to support her during the team’s preseason.

Recent 2024 WNBA Draft pick Kate Martin of Iowa women’s basketball fame was among those supporting Wilson’s college team, which is really fascinating because of the on-court rivalry those two teams have had in the women’s NCAA tournament the past few years.

While South Carolina and Iowa aren’t necessarily big fans of each other on game days, Martin is now a teammate to one of the biggest names in women’s basketball in Wilson.

Plus, the Aces are playing in South Carolina against Puerto Rico for a preseason game, so the support is all the more endearing.

Advertisement

She’s used to playing with a great talent like Caitlin Clark, so being able to play with and support Wilson now is as good a reason as any to represent South Carolina for a day.

Hey, if we played with someone as great as Wilson on the court, we’d be ready to wear an opposing college team’s gear, too!





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

South-Carolina

Why writing by hand beats typing for thinking and learning

Published

on

Why writing by hand beats typing for thinking and learning


If you’re like many digitally savvy Americans, it has likely been a while since you’ve spent much time writing by hand.

The laborious process of tracing out our thoughts, letter by letter, on the page is becoming a relic of the past in our screen-dominated world, where text messages and thumb-typed grocery lists have replaced handwritten letters and sticky notes. Electronic keyboards offer obvious efficiency benefits that have undoubtedly boosted our productivity — imagine having to write all your emails longhand.

To keep up, many schools are introducing computers as early as preschool, meaning some kids may learn the basics of typing before writing by hand.

But giving up this slower, more tactile way of expressing ourselves may come at a significant cost, according to a growing body of research that’s uncovering the surprising cognitive benefits of taking pen to paper, or even stylus to iPad — for both children and adults.

Advertisement

In kids, studies show that tracing out ABCs, as opposed to typing them, leads to better and longer-lasting recognition and understanding of letters. Writing by hand also improves memory and recall of words, laying down the foundations of literacy and learning. In adults, taking notes by hand during a lecture, instead of typing, can lead to better conceptual understanding of material.

“There’s actually some very important things going on during the embodied experience of writing by hand,” says Ramesh Balasubramaniam, a neuroscientist at the University of California, Merced. “It has important cognitive benefits.”

While those benefits have long been recognized by some (for instance, many authors, including Jennifer Egan and Neil Gaiman, draft their stories by hand to stoke creativity), scientists have only recently started investigating why writing by hand has these effects.

A slew of recent brain imaging research suggests handwriting’s power stems from the relative complexity of the process and how it forces different brain systems to work together to reproduce the shapes of letters in our heads onto the page.

Your brain on handwriting

Both handwriting and typing involve moving our hands and fingers to create words on a page. But handwriting, it turns out, requires a lot more fine-tuned coordination between the motor and visual systems. This seems to more deeply engage the brain in ways that support learning.

Advertisement

“Handwriting is probably among the most complex motor skills that the brain is capable of,” says Marieke Longcamp, a cognitive neuroscientist at Aix-Marseille Université.

Gripping a pen nimbly enough to write is a complicated task, as it requires your brain to continuously monitor the pressure that each finger exerts on the pen. Then, your motor system has to delicately modify that pressure to re-create each letter of the words in your head on the page.

“Your fingers have to each do something different to produce a recognizable letter,” says Sophia Vinci-Booher, an educational neuroscientist at Vanderbilt University. Adding to the complexity, your visual system must continuously process that letter as it’s formed. With each stroke, your brain compares the unfolding script with mental models of the letters and words, making adjustments to fingers in real time to create the letters’ shapes, says Vinci-Booher.

That’s not true for typing.

To type “tap” your fingers don’t have to trace out the form of the letters — they just make three relatively simple and uniform movements. In comparison, it takes a lot more brainpower, as well as cross-talk between brain areas, to write than type.

Advertisement

Recent brain imaging studies bolster this idea. A study published in January found that when students write by hand, brain areas involved in motor and visual information processing “sync up” with areas crucial to memory formation, firing at frequencies associated with learning.

“We don’t see that [synchronized activity] in typewriting at all,” says Audrey van der Meer, a psychologist and study co-author at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. She suggests that writing by hand is a neurobiologically richer process and that this richness may confer some cognitive benefits.

Other experts agree. “There seems to be something fundamental about engaging your body to produce these shapes,” says Robert Wiley, a cognitive psychologist at the University of North Carolina, Greensboro. “It lets you make associations between your body and what you’re seeing and hearing,” he says, which might give the mind more footholds for accessing a given concept or idea.

Those extra footholds are especially important for learning in kids, but they may give adults a leg up too. Wiley and others worry that ditching handwriting for typing could have serious consequences for how we all learn and think.

What might be lost as handwriting wanes

The clearest consequence of screens and keyboards replacing pen and paper might be on kids’ ability to learn the building blocks of literacy — letters.

Advertisement

“Letter recognition in early childhood is actually one of the best predictors of later reading and math attainment,” says Vinci-Booher. Her work suggests the process of learning to write letters by hand is crucial for learning to read them.

“When kids write letters, they’re just messy,” she says. As kids practice writing “A,” each iteration is different, and that variability helps solidify their conceptual understanding of the letter.

Research suggests kids learn to recognize letters better when seeing variable handwritten examples, compared with uniform typed examples.

This helps develop areas of the brain used during reading in older children and adults, Vinci-Booher found.

“This could be one of the ways that early experiences actually translate to long-term life outcomes,” she says. “These visually demanding, fine motor actions bake in neural communication patterns that are really important for learning later on.”

Advertisement

Ditching handwriting instruction could mean that those skills don’t get developed as well, which could impair kids’ ability to learn down the road.

“If young children are not receiving any handwriting training, which is very good brain stimulation, then their brains simply won’t reach their full potential,” says van der Meer. “It’s scary to think of the potential consequences.”

Many states are trying to avoid these risks by mandating cursive instruction. This year, California started requiring elementary school students to learn cursive, and similar bills are moving through state legislatures in several states, including Indiana, Kentucky, South Carolina and Wisconsin. (So far, evidence suggests that it’s the writing by hand that matters, not whether it’s print or cursive.)

Slowing down and processing information

For adults, one of the main benefits of writing by hand is that it simply forces us to slow down.

During a meeting or lecture, it’s possible to type what you’re hearing verbatim. But often, “you’re not actually processing that information — you’re just typing in the blind,” says van der Meer. “If you take notes by hand, you can’t write everything down,” she says.

Advertisement

The relative slowness of the medium forces you to process the information, writing key words or phrases and using drawing or arrows to work through ideas, she says. “You make the information your own,” she says, which helps it stick in the brain.

Such connections and integration are still possible when typing, but they need to be made more intentionally. And sometimes, efficiency wins out. “When you’re writing a long essay, it’s obviously much more practical to use a keyboard,” says van der Meer.

Still, given our long history of using our hands to mark meaning in the world, some scientists worry about the more diffuse consequences of offloading our thinking to computers.

“We’re foisting a lot of our knowledge, extending our cognition, to other devices, so it’s only natural that we’ve started using these other agents to do our writing for us,” says Balasubramaniam.

It’s possible that this might free up our minds to do other kinds of hard thinking, he says. Or we might be sacrificing a fundamental process that’s crucial for the kinds of immersive cognitive experiences that enable us to learn and think at our full potential.

Advertisement

Balasubramaniam stresses, however, that we don’t have to ditch digital tools to harness the power of handwriting. So far, research suggests that scribbling with a stylus on a screen activates the same brain pathways as etching ink on paper. It’s the movement that counts, he says, not its final form.

Jonathan Lambert is a Washington, D.C.-based freelance journalist who covers science, health and policy.

Copyright 2024 NPR





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending