Connect with us

Mississippi

Food firm in Mississippi on notice from FDA over seafood violations

Published

on

Food firm in Mississippi on notice from FDA over seafood violations


As a part of its enforcement actions, the Meals and Drug Administration sends warning letters to entities below its jurisdiction. Some letters usually are not posted for public view till weeks or months after they’re despatched. Enterprise house owners have 15 days to reply to FDA warning letters. Warning letters typically usually are not issued till an organization has been given months to years to appropriate issues.


Biloxi Freezing & Processing, Inc.
Biloxi, MS

A meals agency in Mississippi is on discover from the FDA for critical violations of the seafood Hazard Evaluation and Essential Management Level (HACCP) regulation.

In a March 16, 2023, warning letter, the FDA described a Nov. 8-21, 2022, FDA inspection of Biloxi Freezing & Processing, Inc.’s seafood processing facility in Biloxi, MS.

Advertisement

The FDA’s inspection revealed that the agency was not in compliance with laws and resulted within the issuance of an FDA Type 483. 

Important violations:

Adulteration

1. The agency should confirm that their HACCP plan is ample to manage meals security hazards which might be fairly more likely to happen. Nevertheless, their HACCP plan for M&M Shrimp IQF, together with the Deliberate Verification Actions doc fails to listing verification procedures required at any of their vital management factors to manage sulfite declarations and allergen declarations. Ongoing verification procedures ought to embrace reviewing monitoring and corrective motion information inside one week of the day the information had been made, calibration of apparatus, and verification of the adequacy of vital limits. The agency didn’t confirm the adequacy of the vital limits.

2. The agency should monitor sanitation circumstances and practices throughout processing with enough frequency to make sure compliance with present good manufacturing follow necessities. Nevertheless, the agency didn’t monitor security of water with enough frequency to make sure compliance with the present good manufacturing follow necessities as evidenced by a water hose used to clean meals contact floor noticed on Nov. 8, 2022, saved partially submerged in water on the ground. The water hose was additionally not related to a backflow prevention gadget. Additional, the agency didn’t monitor correct labeling, storage, and use of poisonous compounds with enough frequency to make sure compliance as evidenced by an noticed two-gallon tank sprayer labeled as Roundup saved adjoining to meals contact tools, which contained an unidentified purple liquid on Nov. 8, 2022.

Advertisement

3. The agency should implement the monitoring procedures and frequency that they’ve listed of their HACCP plan and (redacted). Nevertheless, the agency didn’t have a file recognized as “(redacted)” as required by their HACCP plan for the monitoring of allergens on the Allergen Labeling vital management level (CCP#1) to manage the crustacean allergen for IQF shrimp. Moreover, the file recognized as “1st Piece Inspection Type” states “Please guarantee label is appropriate and allergens (Shrimp and Sulfites) are clearly recognized as it’s our CCP#1.” Nevertheless, the shape doesn’t present area for monitoring observations displaying the presence of shrimp and sulfites on the label as a substitute of a non-specific allergen declaration.

Misbranding

1. The agency’s 16/20 Uncooked IQF Headless Brown Shrimp product is misbranded in that the labeling fails to declare the frequent or typical identify of every ingredient. Particularly, the product label declares the ingredient “tripoly;” nevertheless, tripoly shouldn’t be a standard or typical identify. FDA notes that if the supposed ingredient is “Sodium Tripolyphosphate” then it must be declared as such. As well as, when an accredited chemical preservative is added to a meals, the ingredient listing should embrace each the frequent or typical identify of the preservative and the operate of the preservative by together with phrases, corresponding to “preservative”, “to retard spoilage”, “a mildew inhibitor”, “to assist defend taste”, or “to advertise colour retention.” As such, if this ingredient is used as a preservative within the shrimp, then the operate have to be declared (e.g., “Sodium Tripolyphosphate (to retain moisture)”).

2. The agency’s 31/40 product is misbranded in that it fails to bear the frequent or typical identify of the meals. Particularly, “31/40” shouldn’t be an applicable assertion of identification for shrimp.

3. The agency’s 16/20 Uncooked IQF Headless Brown Shrimp product is misbranded in that it fails to bear the place of job of the producer, packer, or distributor. Particularly, the product label solely consists of the identify of the distributor. The assertion of the place of job should embrace the road handle, metropolis, state, and ZIP code; nevertheless, the road handle could also be omitted whether it is proven in a present metropolis listing or phone listing.

Advertisement

FDA additionally provided the next feedback:

  • The plan lists an insufficient monitoring frequency “ongoing” at CCP#2 for controlling the hazard of sulfite inclusion. The listed frequency doesn’t present the required specificity for the way typically monitoring ought to happen. The monitoring file, “(redacted) Type,” lists (redacted). That or related data must be listed within the CCP#2 monitoring procedures.
  • CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS (CCP)/PREVENTIVE CONTROL (PC) DESCRIPTION doc identifies the metallic detector step as a preventive management level. It must be recognized as a vital management level if the inclusion of metallic fragments is set to be a fairly doubtless hazard of their hazard evaluation. A hazard must be recognized within the HACCP plan whether it is fairly more likely to happen within the absence of controls. The hazard evaluation erroneously decided that the metallic detector (i.e., a management) made the hazard unlikely.
  • The corrective actions for allergen labeling (CCP#1) and sulfiting declarations (CCP#2) handle solely the disposition of doubtless affected merchandise and don’t handle the reason for the vital restrict deviations.
  • FDA notes that their 16/20 Uncooked IQF Headless Brown Shrimp product label states “Might Include Sodium Bisulfite, Phosphate (Preservative).” Advisory statements might not be used instead of present good manufacturing practices or elements included in meals. If these are elements or sub-ingredients added to the meals, every ingredient have to be declared within the ingredient listing by its frequent or typical identify (for instance, sodium bisulfite, sodium phosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate) in descending order of predominance by weight except, and the preservative operate of the Sodium Bisulfite have to be declared.
  • FDA notes that the time period “shrimp” within the assertion of identification for his or her 16/20 Uncooked IQF Headless Brown Shrimp product doesn’t meet the FDA necessities and lacks prominence as laid out in FDA laws.

The total warning letter could be seen right here.

(To enroll in a free subscription to Meals Security Information, click on right here.)



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mississippi

One of the largest ever alligators is caught in Mississippi with hunters planning to EAT 800lbs monster

Published

on

One of the largest ever alligators is caught in Mississippi with hunters planning to EAT 800lbs monster


Mississippi’s 2024 alligator hunting season got off to a whopping start when a team of six hunters reeled in one of the largest monsters ever caught in the state.

The 14-foot-long, 802-pound alligator was caught in the Yazoo River, which stretches over 2,000 miles through Mississippi and Louisiana. 

The group stood proudly with their catch for photographs, and all six were needed to hold up the lifeless creature.

The yearly hunt kicked off last month and is set to run until September 9, allowing participants to take home their prize for ‘wallets, belts and eating,’ according to state rules.

Advertisement

The group reeled in the alligator last week in the dead of night. Officials determine the creature measured 14 feet long and weighed over 800 pounds

There are more than 3,700 people participating in the 2024 hunt, with an average of five to six people on each team.

The rules state that permit holders may harvest up to two alligators over four feet long, but only one can be longer than seven feet.

The largest a alligator ever recorded was 19 feet, two inches long and weighed more than 2,300 pounds when it was caught in in Louisiana in 1890.

However, the most recent monster was captured in Arkansas by  Mike Cottingham in 2021.

Cottingham claimed the beast was 13 feet, three inches long and weighed 1,380 pounds.

Advertisement

The largest in Mississippi, killed in 2023, was about three inches longer than the one captured this year. 

The team, which included Megan Sasser, braved torrential rains to capture the 60-year-old beast.

In a social media post, Sasser said she and her team are ‘still over the moon’ after reeling in the reptile last Friday. 

‘We sat through a monsoon for over 3 hours… crunched 2 poles, survived the death roll a few times, displaced everything in the boat, and still managed to bring this monster home,’ she continued. 

Brandi Robinson, also part of the winning team, explained that the giant alligator was spotted 250 yards away from the boat.

Advertisement
Mississippi holds the hunt each year, allowing participants to capture no more than two alligators

Mississippi holds the hunt each year, allowing participants to capture no more than two alligators

Brandi Robinson (pictured), also part of the winning team, explained that the giant alligator was spotted 250 yards away from the boat

Brandi Robinson (pictured), also part of the winning team, explained that the giant alligator was spotted 250 yards away from the boat 

‘Everyone’s binoculars were immediately glued! It was a big one and we all knew that,’ she said, as reported by The State.

The boat slowly made its way toward the giant creature and the team waited for about 45 minutes for it to come back to the surface before wrestling with for about an hour.

It is not clear what tools were used to capture the alligator, but hunters can use everything from snatch hooks to harpoons and even firearms.

The six-person team loaded their catch into the boat and brought it to a local meat processing company, Red Antler. 

After taking pictures with the prized gator, the team took it to a local meat processing facility

After taking pictures with the prized gator, the team took it to a local meat processing facility

‘In the last five years, we here at Red Antler have processed probably about 3,000 alligators, and we have only got two that were over the 14-foot in length measurement,’ Shane Smith, owner of Red Antler Processing, told McClatchy News.

Advertisement

The team took most of the meat home and donated the rest to Hunter Harvest, a nonprofit organization that gives hunted and harvested meat to families in need.

Sasser also shared a picture of her and the alligator on Facebook where friends called it  a ‘monster.’

However, not everyone was thrilled to see the giant catch.

One Facebook user commented: ‘That gator had to be at least 50 years old to have gotten that big. Such a shame. He’s a beautiful animal.’



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Mississippi

Possible overdose at the Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, according to officials

Published

on

Possible overdose at the Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, according to officials


RANKIN Co., Miss. (WLBT) – The Rankin County Sheriff’s Department reports that they have been called to the Central Mississippi Correctional Facility for an alleged overdose.

The Rankin County Coronor, David Ruth, confirmed to WLBT staff that he was called to the scene to recover a body. He said he was unable to comment on the cause or manner of death until he performs an autopsy.

The Department of Health also says they have been called by the facility for a hazmat situation.

More law enforcement vehicles were seen by WLBT crews entering the Central Mississippi Correctional Facility as authorities continue to investigate a death at the prison.

Advertisement

Details are currently limited. WLBT has reached out to the Mississippi Department of Corrections for a statement on the situation but have yet to hear back.

WLBT 3 on your side will update with information as it is made available.

Want more WLBT news in your inbox? Click here to subscribe to our newsletter.

See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Please click here to report it and include the headline of the story in your email.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

Mississippi State Football Depth Chart for ASU: Kelly Akharaiyi Status Uncertain

Published

on

Mississippi State Football Depth Chart for ASU: Kelly Akharaiyi Status Uncertain


STARKVILLE – Mississippi State debuted 41 new players against Eastern Kentucky, including 23 transfers. But one of the biggest transfer portal additions wasn’t on the field and may not be again this week.

Senior receiver Kelly Akharaiyi was left off Mississippi State’s depth chart that was released and coach Jeff Lebby didn’t provide much clarity on the situation either.

“He’s getting closer and closer,” Lebby said at Tuesday morning press conference. “We need to be patient with him. We hope he has a good week and can create some confidence for himself more than anything. But I’m not ready to say he’s going to be available.”

Akharaiyi was one of the transfers most were looking forward to seeing in Lebby’s fast-paced, passing offense. But he was held out of season-opener for what was thought to be a minor injury. However, his uncertain status might be a sign of a more serious injury?

Advertisement

Or is Lebby playing a game of cat-and-mouse with Arizona State coach Kenny Dillingham? We’ll found out soon enough.

Mississippi State Bulldogs quarterback Blake Shapen looks to pass against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels.

Mississippi State Bulldogs quarterback Blake Shapen looks to pass against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels during the second quarter at Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field. / Matt Bush-Imagn Images

QB1 – 2 Blake Shapen, 6-1, 210 lbs., Sr.
QB2 – 16 Chris Parson, 6-1, 215 lbs., Rs Fr.
or – 0 Michael Van Buren Jr., 6-1, 200 lbs., Fr.

Mississippi State Bulldogs running back Davon Booth (21) runs the ball against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels.

Mississippi State Bulldogs running back Davon Booth (21) runs the ball against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels during the third quarter at Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field. / Matt Bush-Imagn Images

RB1 – 24 Keyvone Lee, 6-0, 225 lbs., Sr.
-or- 21 Davon Booth, 5-10, 205 lbs., Sr.
RB2 – 20 Johnnie Daniels, 5-10, 200 lbs., Jr.

Mississippi State Bulldogs wide receiver Jordan Mosley runs the ball while defended by Eastern Kentucky Colonels.

Mississippi State Bulldogs wide receiver Jordan Mosley runs the ball while defended by Eastern Kentucky Colonels defensive back Sam Robertson during the third quarter at Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field. / Matt Bush-Imagn Images

SLWR1 – 3 Kevin Coleman, 5-11, 180 lbs., Jr. 
SLWR2 – 8 Creed Whittemore, 5-11, 185 lbs., So.
SLWR 3 – 80 Kade Kolka, 5-11, 190 lbs., Sr.

WR1 – 6 Jordan Mosley, 6-0, 195 lbs., Jr. 
WR2 – 5 Stonka Burnside, 6-0, 200 lbs., Fr.  
WR3 – 13 Sanfrisco Magee, 6-2, 200 lbs., Fr.

Advertisement

WR1 – 14 Trent Hudson 6-3 180 Jr. 
WR2 – 7 Mario Craver 5-10 170 Fr. 
WR3 – 11 Jaden Walley 6-0 190 Sr.

TE1 – 18 Seydou Traore, 6-4, 235 lbs., R-Jr.
– or –  84 Justin Ball, 6-6, 250 lbs., Sr. 
TE2 – 86 Nick Lauderdale, 6-3, 225 lbs., Sr.
or – 10 Cameron Ball, 6-6, 250 lbs., So.

LT1 – 66 Makylan Pounders, 6-5, 310 lbs., Jr. 
LT2 – 51 Luke Work, 6-6, 305 lbs., Fr.
– or – 74 Jimothy Lewis Jr., 6-6, 310 lbs., Fr.

LG1 – 75 Jacoby Jackson, 6-6, 320 lbs., Jr. 
LG2 – 53 Malik Ellis, 6-5, 285 lbs., So.

C1 – 67 Ethan Miner, 6-2, 305 lbs., Sr.
C2 – 72 Canon Boone, 6-4, 315 lbs., Jr.

Advertisement

RG1 – 77 Marlon Martinez, 6-5, 320 lbs., Sr. 
RG2 – 52 Grant Jackson, 6-6, 325 lbs., Sr.

RT1 – 76 Albert Reese IV, 6-7, 330 lbs., Jr. 
RT2 – 55 Leon Bell, 6-8, 325 lbs., R-Jr. 
RT3 – 78 Amari Smith, 6-7, 325 lbs., R-Fr.

DT1 – 22 Kedrick Bingley-Jones, 6-4, 310 lbs., Jr.
 – or – 23 Trevion Williams, 6-4, 295 lbs., R-Fr. 
DT2 – 98 Ashun Shepphard, 6-3, 280 lbs., Jr.

DT1 – 35 Kalvin Dinkins, 6-2, 315 lbs., So.
– or – 8 Sulaiman Kpaka, 6-3, 300 lbs., Sr. 
DT2 – 92 Eric Taylor, 6-4, 310 lbs., Jr.
– or – 90 Kai McClendon, 6-2, 305 lbs., Fr.

DE1 – 9 De’Monte Russell, 6-4, 285 lbs., Sr. 
DE2 – 91 Deonte Anderson, 6-3, 270 lbs., Jr.
– or – 46 Joseph Head Jr., 6-4, 240 lbs., R-Fr.

Advertisement
Mississippi State Bulldogs defensive lineman Kedrick Bingley-Jones (22) reacts after a play against Eastern Kentucky.

Mississippi State Bulldogs defensive lineman Kedrick Bingley-Jones (22) reacts after a play against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels during the third quarter at Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field. / Matt Bush-Imagn Images

JLB1 – 11 Ty Cooper, 6-4, 245 lbs., Jr.
– or – 44 Branden Jennings, 6-3, 240 lbs., Jr. 
JLB2 – 36 Donterry Russell, 6-4, 225 lbs., So.

MLB1 – 7 Stone Blanton, 6-2, 230 lbs., Jr. 
MLB2 – 26 JP Purvis, 6-1, 245 lbs., Sr.

DLB1 – 40 Nic Mitchell, 6-2, 230 lbs., Jr.
– or – 5 John Lewis, 6-3, 240 lbs., Jr. 
DLB2 – 16 Zakari Tillman, 6-2, 225 lbs., So.

FS1 – 2 Isaac Smith, 6-0, 205 lbs., So. 
FS2 – 12 Tyler Woodard, 6-2, 200 lbs., Jr.

SS1 – 21 Hunter Washington, 5-11, 190 lbs., Jr. 
SS2 – 27 Chris Keys Jr., 6-0, 190 lbs., Jr.
– or – 17 Jordan Morant, 6-0, 210 lbs., Sr.

Advertisement

CB1 – 1 Kelley Jones, 6-4, 195 lbs., R-Fr.
– or – 6 Traveon Wright, 6-0, 180 lbs., R-Fr. 
CB2 – 13 Raydarious Jones, 6-2, 180 lbs., Sr.
– or – 18 Khamauri Rogers, 6-0, 180 lbs., So.

CB1 – 14 Brice Pollock, 6-1, 190 lbs., So. 
CB2 – 4 DeAgo Brumfield, 6-0, 190 lbs., Sr.

Mississippi State Bulldogs wide receiver Kevin Coleman (3) runs the ball against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels.

Mississippi State Bulldogs wide receiver Kevin Coleman (3) runs the ball against the Eastern Kentucky Colonels during the first quarter at Davis Wade Stadium at Scott Field. / Matt Bush-Imagn Images

K1 – 80 Kyle Ferrie, 6-1, 205 lbs., So. 
K2 – 82 Nick Barr-Mira, 6-0, 185 lbs., Sr. 
K3 – 49 Marlon Hauck, 6-3, 195 lbs., So.

P1 – 82 Nick Barr-Mira, 6-0, 185 lbs., Sr. 
P2 – 83 Zach Haynes, 6-1, 195 lbs., Sr. 
P3 – 88 Ethan Pulliam, 6-1, 190 lbs., R-Fr.

KO1 – 49 Marlon Hauck, 6-3, 195 lbs., So.  
KO2 – 82 Nick Barr-Mira, 6-0, 185 lbs., Sr.

Advertisement

PR1 – 3 Kevin Coleman, 5-11, 180 lbs., Jr. 
PR2 – 8 Creed Whittemore, 5-11, 185 lbs., So.

KR1 – 21 Davon Booth, 5-10, 205 lbs., Sr.
– or – 20 Johnnie Daniels, 5-10, 200 lbs., Jr. 
– or – 3 Kevin Coleman, 5-11, 180 lbs., Jr.

Mississippi State at Arizona State: How to Watch Bulldogs Football vs the Sun Devils

Mississippi State vs Ole Miss: 2025 Recruiting Battle Heats Up

Mississippi State vs. Arizona State: Top 5 Sun Devils to Watch

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending