Connect with us

Mississippi

Brett Favre solicited welfare money from the poorest state in the nation and it’s time to pay up

Published

on

Brett Favre solicited welfare money from the poorest state in the nation and it’s time to pay up


That is the net model of our each day e-newsletter, The Morning Win. Subscribe to get irreverent and incisive sports activities tales, delivered to your mailbox each morning. Alex McDaniel is filling in for Andy Nesbitt. 

Greater than two years after we discovered of Brett Favre’s involvement in one of the gorgeous embezzlement scandals in Mississippi historical past, he’s now one in every of 38 defendants accused of misusing welfare funds supposed to alleviate poverty in essentially the most impoverished state within the nation. 

Favre’s function within the scheme is tied to his relationship with Nancy New, a nonprofit director who had entry to tens of millions in welfare funds, and John Davis, the disgraced former director of the Mississippi Division of Human Companies (MDHS) who allotted the cash within the first place —together with $68 million in federal welfare cash from the Non permanent Help for Needy Households (TANF) program. 

Although TANF funding ought to be used to supply significant assist for Mississippi’s low-income households, New’s nonprofit invested tens of millions into retired athletes’ pet tasks, together with at the least $8 million tied to Favre’s enterprise endeavors and a brand new athletic facility at his alma mater, the College of Southern Mississippi. 

Advertisement

Favre maintains he didn’t know any of that cash was funded by TANF {dollars}. What he and his defenders are lacking, nevertheless, is that his duty on this scenario isn’t about whether or not the cash got here from a selected federal grant. He solicited cash from an anti-poverty nonprofit funded by Mississippi’s welfare company. Nearly each federal greenback MDHS receives is meant to assist the state’s most weak individuals, not its most privileged, and it’s time to cease giving Favre a move for what he didn’t know and begin holding him accountable for what he did know. 

For starters, he knew he was paid $1.1 million by New’s nonprofit for occasion appearances and talking engagements he didn’t carry out (which he’s since repaid to MDHS). He knew that very same nonprofit allotted $5 million at his request towards constructing a brand new volleyball facility at Southern Miss, the place Favre’s daughter simply occurred to be a member of the crew. Hattiesburg is a university city with one of many highest poverty charges within the state, and as a substitute of utilizing sources to assist its poorest residents, MDHS put tens of millions towards making Favre appear to be a hometown hero coming by means of for his alma mater. 

He knew to return to Davis and New when searching for traders for Prevacus, a start-up drug firm specializing in concussion therapy. After investing $1 million of his personal cash and attempting (and failing) to get the NFL on board, Favre and his enterprise accomplice turned to Gov. Phil Bryant for assist getting Prevacus off the bottom rapidly. 

Two days after assembly with the governor, Favre despatched the next textual content to Prevacus founder Jake Vanlandingham, as reported by nonprofit information outlet Mississippi Immediately.

“Textual content Nancy (New) and embody me if you need and mainly ask her if she will help with traders, grants or every other method potential. She has sturdy connections and gave me 5 million for Vball facility by way of grant cash. Supply her no matter you are feeling like.”

After Vanlandingham linked with New, Favre made it clear he knew precisely how they may get cash for the start-up.

Advertisement

“I imagine if it’s potential she and John Davis would use federal grant cash for Prevacus.”

And identical to that, New and Davis dedicated $2.1 million in welfare cash to a mission that did nothing to alleviate Mississippi’s ongoing poverty disaster. (It’s price mentioning that of the $135 million in TANF funding Mississippi obtained in 2018, solely $7.3 million of that went towards direct money help for low-income households.)

Maybe most tellingly, Favre knew the challenges that confronted him when the governor changed Davis with a brand new MDHS director who began taking note of the place the cash was going.

“Nancy (New) stated (Christopher Freeze, the brand new MDHS director) ain’t our kind,” Favre texted Vanlandingham, as reported by Mississippi Immediately.

“F***,” Vanlandingham replied. “Properly we may have the governor to make him our kind.”

Not precisely the strongest case for somebody claiming complete ignorance.

As a substitute of proudly owning as much as it and utilizing what he knew to make clear one of the damaging public corruption instances in state historical past, he selected to evade reporters whereas choosing public fights with the state auditor who led the investigation.

Advertisement

Perhaps he didn’t work extra time to clear his title as a result of he’s used to enjoying the function of Mississippi’s chosen son. He’s Brett Favre, in spite of everything! The delight of Hancock County. The Golden Eagle with the golden arm. He’d by no means do something to harm the state he loves.

It’s simple to like Mississippi once you don’t must acknowledge what number of of its persons are struggling to maintain the lights on. You by no means must look within the eyes of a kid begging a cafeteria employee for seconds as a result of the cabinets are naked at house. You don’t have to inform a single mom she’s not entitled to child-care help till she sues her baby’s father for help and her solely decisions are to give up her job or depart her infants house alone so she will earn a paycheck.

Advertisement

It’s simple to like Mississippi when your Mississippi is a spot of privilege and alternative. 

It’s loads more durable when individuals like Favre profit from a long time of good-old-boy corruption whereas the state stays the worst place within the nation to be a mom or baby. First in toddler mortality, baby poverty and meals insecurity. Practically lifeless final in schooling, healthcare and nearly every thing else that issues. Welfare officers had entry to tens of millions of {dollars} to do a number of good for lots of people. As a substitute, they opted to be an ATM to one of many wealthiest Mississippians alive simply to have the ability to say, “Brett Favre is aware of who I’m.”

It doesn’t matter if Favre was by no means informed the cash he solicited was meant to assist Mississippi’s poorest households. There’s a motive he didn’t work with a distinct company. There’s a motive he bypassed the method of personal fundraising or recruiting outdoors traders. By means of Mississippi’s welfare system, he gained entry to cash nobody was watching and he adopted it till somebody lastly appeared up.

Everyone knows Favre gained’t battle to shake off the unfavorable publicity of this story. It would finally develop into a Wikipedia footnote and everybody will return to writing about his divisive podcast or newest endorsement deal. However he owes much more to the state of Mississippi than simply cash, specifically the essential respect of not ignoring the continuing crises that maintain it on the backside of each good record and the highest of each unhealthy one.

If Brett Favre loves Mississippi half as a lot as he says he does, he ought to use his affect to carry its leaders accountable and assist its most weak individuals. As a result of loving one thing and knowingly contributing to its struggling is the one debt you may’t repay.

Advertisement

For the newest on Mississippi’s welfare scandal, learn The Backchannel from investigative reporter Anna Wolfe and Mississippi Immediately. 

Fast hits: NFL schedule launch… Tyreek Hill has a message for the Tua haters… a DOUBLE TOOTBLAN!… And extra. 

— OK, so possibly it feels just like the NFL has been slowly releasing its schedule for weeks now. As a result of it has. However now we all know all of it, and we’ve chosen 10 must-watch video games and corralled all of the loopy video groups put collectively to go along with the reveal.

— Every little thing goes proper for the Mets, which is a really unusual sentence to jot down. However this Double TOOTBLAN is proof.

— Tyreek Hill has seen your tweets about Tua Tagovailoa’s arm and desires you to know he’s not too involved about follow throws.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Mississippi

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusual

Published

on

Attorneys want the US Supreme Court to say Mississippi’s felony voting ban is cruel and unusual


By EMILY WAGSTER PETTUS

JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court should overturn Mississippi’s Jim Crow-era practice of removing voting rights from people convicted of certain felonies, including nonviolent crimes such as forgery and timber theft, attorneys say in new court papers.

Most of the people affected are disenfranchised for life because the state provides few options for restoring ballot access.

“Mississippi’s harsh and unforgiving felony disenfranchisement scheme is a national outlier,” attorneys representing some who lost voting rights said in an appeal filed Wednesday. They wrote that states “have consistently moved away from lifetime felony disenfranchisement over the past few decades.”

Advertisement

This case is the second in recent years — and the third since the late 19th century — that asks the Supreme Court to overturn Mississippi’s disenfranchisement for some felonies. The cases use different legal arguments, and the court rejected the most recent attempt in 2023.

The new appeal asks justices to reverse a July ruling from the conservative 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which said Mississippi legislators, not the courts, must decide whether to change the laws.

Stripping away voting rights for some crimes is unconstitutional because it is cruel and unusual punishment, the appeal argues. A majority of justices rejected arguments over cruel and unusual punishment in June when they cleared the way for cities to enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outside in public places.

Attorneys who sued Mississippi over voting rights say the authors of the state’s 1890 constitution based disenfranchisement on a list of crimes they thought Black people were more likely to commit. A majority of the appeals judges wrote that the Supreme Court in 1974 reaffirmed constitutional law allowing states to disenfranchise felons.

About 38% of Mississippi residents are Black. Nearly 50,000 people were disenfranchised under the state’s felony voting ban between 1994 and 2017. More than 29,000 of them have completed their sentences, and about 58% of that group are Black, according to an expert who analyzed data for plaintiffs challenging the voting ban.

Advertisement

To regain voting rights in Mississippi, a person convicted of a disenfranchising crime must receive a governor’s pardon or win permission from two-thirds of the state House and Senate. In recent years, legislators have restored voting rights for only a few people.

The other recent case that went to the Supreme Court argued that authors of Mississippi’s constitution showed racist intent when they chose which felonies would cause people to lose the right to vote.

In that ruling, justices declined to reconsider a 2022 appeals court decision that said Mississippi remedied the discriminatory intent of the original provisions in the state constitution by later altering the list of disenfranchising crimes.

In 1950, Mississippi dropped burglary from the list. Murder and rape were added in 1968. The Mississippi attorney general issued an opinion in 2009 that expanded the list to 22 crimes, including timber larceny, carjacking, felony-level shoplifting and felony-level writing bad checks.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a 2023 dissent that Mississippi’s list of disenfranchising crimes was “adopted for an illicit discriminatory purpose.”

Advertisement

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Mississippi's judicial runoff elections

Published

on

AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Mississippi's judicial runoff elections


Voters in central Mississippi and the Delta and Gulf Coast areas will return to the polls Tuesday for a runoff election to resolve two state judicial races in which no candidate received the required vote majority in the Nov. 5 general election



Source link

Continue Reading

Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court balance of power at stake in upcoming runoff

Published

on

Mississippi Supreme Court balance of power at stake in upcoming runoff


JACKSON, Miss. (WLBT) – Four of Mississippi’s Supreme Court Justices were up for re-election this year. Two of those had opponents. One lost in the general election and the other is going to a runoff.

The outcome of next Tuesday’s runoff could change the overall balance of power on the court.

Michigan State University College of Law Professor Quinn Yeargain explains that nonpartisan elections make it tough to get a sense of the ideology of state supreme courts.

The best way to get a glimpse of how the court leans is to look at previous decisions. Yeargain pulled six notable cases to examine.

Advertisement

“In recent years the Mississippi Supreme Court has been more of a far-right court or very conservative court than a moderate-conservative court,” noted Yeargain who is a state constitutional law scholar.

He created a color-coded chart with pink indicating more conservative decisions and green the more moderate ones.

“And so a lot of the decisions that it has reached have been or have had a tendency to be a little bit more extreme, more deferential to the state legislature, more deferential to the governor, less willing to recognize individual rights and liberties, less willing to believe that the government has isolated peoples, individual rights and liberties,” said Yeargain.

The more conservative opinion won out in all of the example cases. But one of those four justices that leaned that way every time referenced is now being replaced. Justice Dawn Beam was defeated by Gulfport lawyer David Sullivan.

Advertisement

“There’s still a lot that will need to be learned about the ideology of the new justice,” Yeargain noted.

Then there’s this runoff for Central District 1 Position 3 with Jim Kitchens and Jenifer Branning.

“Justice Kitchens has been more willing to hold the government to account, to express skepticism about the nature of what the government is doing, and how it is acting,” he said. “But Senator Branning, for example, has been in the government. She has been one of these actors and I think it’s fair to conclude that she might be more deferential to the legislature or to the Governor in how she approached her rulings.”

Yeargain notes that it’s not to say that would be the case for Branning.

He hopes voters will do research about the positions of the judges before returning to the polls for the runoff.

Advertisement

WATCH: Justice Jim Kitchen’s Interview on WLBT+

Want more WLBT news in your inbox? Click here to subscribe to our newsletter.

See a spelling or grammar error in our story? Please click here to report it and include the headline of the story in your email.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending