Connect with us

Maryland

Maryland Equitable Justice Commission Proposes 18 Reforms to Address Racial Disparities, Highlighting That Black Residents Make Up 30% of the Population but 71% of Those Incarcerated – The MoCo Show

Published

on

Maryland Equitable Justice Commission Proposes 18 Reforms to Address Racial Disparities, Highlighting That Black Residents Make Up 30% of the Population but 71% of Those Incarcerated – The MoCo Show


The Maryland Equitable Justice Commission (MEJC) has proposed 18 recommendations to address the state’s high incarceration rates and racial disparities in the criminal justice system, focusing on reforms in sentencing, reentry programs, trauma-informed care, youth justice, and parole processes. The initiatives aim to reduce the disproportionate incarceration of Black Marylanders, who make up 71% of the prison population despite being 30% of the state’s residents.

Per the Maryland Attorney General’s Office: “Maryland has the nation’s highest percentage of Black people in its prisons when compared to the general population. To address this crisis, the Maryland Equitable Justice Commission (MEJC) approved today recommendations for legislative and agency reforms, program development, data collection, and other measures designed to reduce the mass incarceration of Black men and women and other marginalized groups in Maryland prisons and jails. While Black Marylanders make up about 30% of the state’s overall population, 71% of people incarcerated in Maryland correctional facilities are Black Marylanders. This impact of this incarceration is enormous, disrupting housing, employment, family systems, and both individual and community health and well-being.

Today’s 18 recommendations are designed to tackle long-seeded issues that have contributed to Maryland’s high incarceration rates and racial disparities throughout the legal system. They are the culmination of a pioneering partnership between Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown and Maryland Public Defender Natasha Dartigue, who, together, established the MEJC in October 2023. The MEJC is a collaborative with more than 40 stakeholder members from the government, private sector, and the community, as well as two academic partners: The Judge Alexander Williams, Jr. Center for Education, Justice & Ethics and the Bowie State University Institute for Restorative Justice.

The recommendations, listed below, were developed by the following work groups of Collaborative members focused on areas known to impact incarceration rates:
MEJC Work Groups
• Criminal Law and Sentencing Reform
• Health and Human Services
• Education, Workforce Development and Economic Opportunity
• Prison, Jail and Detention Facility Reform
• Promoting Successful Reentry and Preventing Reincarceration
• Law Enforcement Policies and Practices
• Youth Justice Reform.

Advertisement

“No single person created mass incarceration, and no single person can correct its devastating effects on communities of color across Maryland. That is a job for prosecutors and defense attorneys, academics and legislators, law enforcement, the judiciary, and reformers, all of whom participated in the Maryland Equitable Justice Collaborative,” said Attorney General Anthony G. Brown. “These recommendations are a crucial first step in making our State fairer, and safer, for all. Just as this crisis has harmed Black communities for decades, our efforts will impact Maryland families for generations, helping them heal from the trauma of mass incarceration. We must end mass incarceration and eliminate the racial biases and disparities in our criminal legal system.”

From Public Defender Natasha M. Dartigue: “The impact of mass incarceration extends far beyond the restrictive, steel bars to crippling the financial, social and emotional growth of families and communities. The ripple effect of prioritizing punitive policies and practices over data-driven approaches, coupled with racially disparate implementation, has irreparably damaged individuals and devastated communities. High incarceration rates contribute to weakened community ties, less social cohesion and a reduced workforce population. By disrupting the cycle of poverty, trauma and instability, the recommendations are an important first step in creating reform that both tackles mass incarceration and promotes public safety. I applaud the MEJC members for the tremendous dedication shown, expertise shared, and teamwork championed.”

The recommendations are:
1. Conduct a statewide assessment to find gaps in Maryland’s crisis response systems. Based on the assessment’s results, develop ways the state can help counties improve their use, implementation, and expansion of alternative crisis response models and infrastructure.
2. Pass legislation to end non-safety-related traffic stops; enhance data reporting requirements and include data on race and gender; re-examine the use and efficacy of consent searches to reduce unnecessary interactions with police and allow for more appropriate utilization of law enforcement.
3. Scale the impact and success of cognitive behavioral theory training programs and mandate that all sworn police officers in Maryland receive the training.
4. Conduct a qualitative and quantitative analysis of each step in the criminal legal process – from arrest to parole – to understand the impact of racial and geographic disparities in Maryland’s adult prison population.
5. Develop and adopt a Sentencing Pilot using a needs-based, case management approach in collaboration with the Division of Parole and Probation in at least two Maryland counties.
6. Reduce unnecessary pretrial confinement by changing the district court discovery rules so that prosecutors must give discovery to the defense within a reasonable timeframe, developing a uniform civilian complaint review process across all State’s Attorney’s Offices, and allowing defendants to waive their right to a bail review hearing.
7.Develop a pilot program to improve access to trauma-informed mental health treatment for people incarcerated in Maryland’s jails and detention centers.
8. Incentivize primary care physicians to conduct Adverse Childhood Experiences screening with community-led follow-up interventions.
9. Increase the number of people eligible for earlier parole consideration due to serious medical conditions and having reached an age where they no longer pose a threat to public safety.
10. Enhance the transparency, consistency, and efficacy of parole decisions by allowing access to the materials and justifications relied upon for decision-making, developing clear guidance on the application of factors impacting release, identifying actions or steps that incarcerated people can take to improve their chances for release, surveying the services available to incarcerated people upon release, and publishing detailed reports on the Maryland Parole Commission’s activities.
11. Pilot an Emerging Adults Program (ages 18-25) that creates protocols geared toward community building and intensive services to improve post-release success and prevent future system involvement.
12. Expand and improve community-based reentry programming by creating a protocol to share specific service needs of people who are incarcerated; collecting and publishing data on the effectiveness of reentry services; ensuring that all state facilities offer reentry services; increasing funding for successful reentry programs; and expanding community-based reentry programs’ access to incarcerated people 180 days before their reentry date.
13. Expand access to Second Look laws that empower judges to reduce or modify sentences, but not increase, under specific conditions. These laws should prioritize rehabilitation, requiring judges to assess an individual’s progress, ensure they pose no danger to society, and act in the interests of justice. Decisions must be based on personalized evaluations of behavior and efforts toward reform. Additionally, victims and their representatives should be treated with respect, granted notice of proceedings, allowed to attend and provide input, and offered protective measures like no-contact orders if probation is imposed.
14.Conduct a comprehensive study on the financial obligations imposed on individuals under probation and parole and their impact on successful reentry.
15. Address the rising criminalization of in-school behavior by tracking and analyzing data trends in school-based arrests, enhancing implicit bias training, and revising discipline and criminal justice policies.
16. Amend the compulsory school attendance requirements to allow justice-involved youth to complete their high school requirements through the GED process.
17. Limit the automatic charging of children in adult criminal court.
18. Review the training requirements of judges and magistrates to ensure that their decisions are supported by a comprehensive and working knowledge of implicit bias, cultural competency, adolescent brain development, adverse childhood experiences, trauma, and other important considerations. A summary of the current training requirements and materials involved should be made available for public review.

A report detailing the need for these recommendations, the best practices they rely upon, and suggestions for implementation is due to be released in early 2025.”

Advertisement



Source link

Maryland

See which baby names were the most popular in DC, Maryland, and Virginia in 2025

Published

on

See which baby names were the most popular in DC, Maryland, and Virginia in 2025


The names Liam and Oliva topped the list of the most common baby names selected in 2025, according to the Social Security Administration.

An annual list of popular baby names has been released since 1997, many providing a glimpse into naming trends over the year.

Here’s what names were commonly picked across D.C., Maryland, and Virginia.

Listed in order of ranking

Advertisement

Girls

Washington D.C. – Emma, Sophia, Isabella, Lucy, Zoe

Maryland – Ailany, Charlotte, Olivia, Mia, Sophia

Virginia – Charlotte, Emma, Sophia, Olivia, Amelia

Boys

Washington, D.C. – Noah, Theodore, Henry, Liam, William

Maryland – Liam, Noah, Lucas, Theodore, Oliver

Advertisement

Virginia – Liam, Noah, Theodore, Oliver, Henry



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Maryland Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 13, 2026

Published

on

Maryland Lottery Powerball, Pick 3 results for May 13, 2026


play

The Maryland Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Advertisement

Here’s a look at May 13, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Powerball numbers from May 13 drawing

22-31-52-56-67, Powerball: 15, Power Play: 2

Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 13 drawing

Midday: 0-7-1

Evening: 0-7-2

Advertisement

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 13 drawing

Midday: 8-8-2-4

Evening: 2-2-3-8

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 5 numbers from May 13 drawing

Midday: 6-0-9-7-9

Advertisement

Evening: 5-4-7-4-6

Check Pick 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash Pop numbers from May 13 drawing

9 a.m.: 02

1 p.m.: 15

6 p.m.: 12

Advertisement

11 p.m.: 09

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Bonus Match 5 numbers from May 13 drawing

09-13-22-37-38, Bonus: 21

Check Bonus Match 5 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from May 13 drawing

08-13-39-63-66, Powerball: 02

Advertisement

Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.

Keno

Drawings are held every four minutes. Check winning numbers here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

Maryland Lottery retailers will redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes above $600, winners can claim by mail or in person from the Maryland Lottery office, an Expanded Cashing Authority Program location or cashiers’ windows at Maryland casinos. Prizes over $5,000 must be claimed in person.

Claiming by Mail

Sign your winning ticket and complete a claim form. Include a photocopy of a valid government-issued ID and a copy of a document that shows proof of your Social Security number or Federal Tax ID number. Mail these to:

Advertisement

Maryland Lottery Customer Resource Center

1800 Washington Boulevard

Suite 330

Baltimore, MD 21230

For prizes over $600, bring your signed ticket, a government-issued photo ID, and proof of your Social Security or Federal Tax ID number to Maryland Lottery headquarters, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Baltimore, MD. Claims are by appointment only, Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. This location handles all prize amounts, including prizes over $5,000.

Advertisement

Winning Tickets Worth $25,000 or Less

Maryland Lottery headquarters and select Maryland casinos can redeem winning tickets valued up to $25,000. Note that casinos cannot cash prizes over $600 for non-resident and resident aliens (tax ID beginning with “9”). You must be at least 21 years of age to enter a Maryland casino. Locations include:

  • Horseshoe Casino: 1525 Russell Street, Baltimore, MD
  • MGM National Harbor: 101 MGM National Avenue, Oxon Hill, MD
  • Live! Casino: 7002 Arundel Mills Circle, Hanover, MD
  • Ocean Downs Casino: 10218 Racetrack Road, Berlin, MD
  • Hollywood Casino: 1201 Chesapeake Overlook Parkway, Perryville, MD
  • Rocky Gap Casino: 16701 Lakeview Road NE, Flintstone, MD

Check previous winning numbers and payouts at Maryland Lottery.

When are the Maryland Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 11 p.m. ET Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. ET Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3, Pick 4 and Pick 5 Midday: 12:27 p.m. ET Monday through Friday, 12:28 p.m. ET Saturday and Sunday.
  • Pick 3, 4 and 5 Evening: 7:56 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, 8:10 p.m. ET on Sunday.
  • Cash4Life: 9 p.m. ET daily.
  • Cash Pop: 9 a.m., 1 p.m., 6 p.m. and 11 p.m. daily.
  • Bonus Match 5: 7:56 p.m. ET Monday through Saturday, 8:10 p.m. ET on Sunday.
  • MultiMatch: 7:56 p.m. Monday and Thursday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 11 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Maryland editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Maryland

Landowner Protections Added To Maryland Utility RELIEF Act – The BayNet

Published

on

Landowner Protections Added To Maryland Utility RELIEF Act – The BayNet


ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Governor Moore has signed House Bill 1532 — Utility RELIEF (Reducing Energy Load Inflation for Everyday Families) Act into law today, providing limited relief to Maryland ratepayers while advancing critical protections for property owners impacted by large-scale energy infrastructure projects.

Several Republican-led amendments aimed at delivering broader, long-term cost savings for Maryland families were ultimately rejected, including:

• Ending the EmPOWER Maryland Program;
• Adjusting Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards; and
• Withdrawing from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.

Senator J.B. Jennings successfully secured an amendment to the Utility RELIEF Act, strengthening transparency and notification requirements for landowners impacted by major transmission line projects. The amendment incorporates key language from his bill, Senate Bill 584 — Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Transmission Lines — Notice to Landowners, introduced during the 2026 legislative session in response to concerns surrounding the Brandon Shores Retirement Mitigation Project (PSC Case #9748). Senate Bill 584 requires clear, direct and documented notice to affected and adjacent property owners, including formal notice of their right to intervene in Public Service Commission proceedings, and received favorable testimony from Protect Our Streams, The Valleys Planning Council and the Maryland Farm Bureau.

Advertisement

Harford County Executive Bob Cassilly wrote in support of the measure, saying, “This legislation does not prevent necessary projects from moving forward; it simply ensures that affected citizens are properly notified and afforded due process.”

Joanne Frederick, leader of Stop MPRP, also testified in support of the bill, stating, “Maryland property owners should not have to rely on rumor or last-minute meetings to learn that their land is under consideration for a transmission corridor.”

Although SB584 received a strong hearing before the Senate Energy, Education and the Environment Committee, it was never brought forward for a final vote.

Supporters of the Jennings amendment pointed to major inconsistencies in how utilities interpreted Maryland’s existing notification laws. While developers of the Maryland Piedmont Reliability Project directly informed landowners and local governments of their rights to intervene, BGE relied primarily on a legal advertisement, website posting and social media notice for the Brandon Shores project.

“When this bill didn’t leave committee, I knew that we had to throw a Hail Mary and amend the Utility RELIEF Act to meet the needs of Marylanders like my constituents, who are struggling to navigate an unclear process,” said Senator Jennings.

Advertisement

When facing pushback on the Senate floor, regarding the inconvenience the amendment would cause for utility companies, Jennings said, “It’s somebody’s family’s home, where they raised their children. And to sit there and say to them, ‘I’m sorry you didn’t get notified, tough luck,’ That’s why we are down here, to fight for our constituents… This amendment can fix that, to make sure they’re notified properly and it’s done the right way. It’s simple. I’m disappointed that this is the attitude we are going to take, when I try to fight for my constituency.”

As he fought for the amendment, he warned, “They’re going to be calling each and every one of us, saying I wasn’t notified, they’re taking our family farm and taking my home,” emphasizing that the measure would address a problem many lawmakers will otherwise be forced to confront.

“The statute, as previously written, was too ambiguous and allowed utilities to decide how much, or how little, notice to provide,” Senator Jennings said. “Maryland families deserve a fair and transparent process regardless of which utility is involved.”

The signing of the Utility RELIEF Act comes as Senator Jennings, and several regional lawmakers continue to challenge the Brandon Shores Retirement Mitigation Project before the Public Service Commission. On April 9, 2026, Senator Jennings joined Senators Chris West, Johnny Ray Salling and Mary-Dulany James in filing an appeal. He later submitted a detailed Memorandum of Appeal on April 19, 2026, outlining constituent concerns, alleged deficiencies in the CPCN process and evidence suggesting the proposed transmission infrastructure may extend beyond immediate reliability need.

Among the concerns raised was a 2014 rendering mailed to landowners depicting a second transmission line designated for “future capacity,” raising additional questions about the long-term scope and purpose of the project. During evidentiary hearings last October, a Public Utility Law Judge cited Senator Jennings’ earlier letter challenging the redaction of project files and acknowledged the validity of transparency concerns raised by affected communities. In that letter, Senator Jennings wrote, “My constituents deserve transparency and assurance that there is a genuine and immediate reliability crisis, not that this infrastructure is being justified by speculative, future commercial needs.”

Advertisement

An independent report prepared for the Power Plant Research Program similarly concluded the project could create transmission capacity exceeding identified reliability needs.

The Public Service Commission is now expected to issue a final order in Case #9748 in the coming months.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending