Connect with us

Louisiana

Funeral homes, coroner’s offices at odds over cremation fees

Published

on

Funeral homes, coroner’s offices at odds over cremation fees


BATON ROUGE, La. (WAFB) – It’s not clear when coroners in Louisiana began charging grieving families a fee for the permit needed to cremate their loved ones, but a new legal opinion clearly spells out that there is nothing in state law to support that practice.

The consequence is that dying in Louisiana may be more expensive for your family, depending on which coroner has your body.

That’s because some coroners across the state are now abandoning the fee, which has padded their budgets for years and made dying in Louisiana more costly for families. Other coroners will continue charging families for cremation permits.

The I-Team dug into the fight that this legal opinion has sparked between funeral homes and coroner’s offices across the state.

Advertisement

Mike Clark is the funeral director at Church Funeral Services. He calls the legal opinion from Attorney General Jeff Landry a victory because he believes the fees should have never been charged in the first place, based on Louisiana law.   

“The statute and the law is very clear that coroner’s offices are budgeted by the taxpayer dollars and they have a budget and they’re not to charge for the cremation letters or some other items that they’re charging for,” said Clark.

That fee typically ranges anywhere from $50 to $125. Funeral homes with absorb the fee or pass that cost on to you in order to get a permit to take care of a loved one. Clark says the fees should not be collected and believes the coroner’s offices that do are essentially breaking the law.  

“I don’t see how they can continue when the law is very plain,” said Clark.

Dr. Gerry Cvitanovich is the Jefferson Parish coroner and also serves as the president of the Louisiana Coroner’s Association. Since the Attorney General came out earlier this month his office, like many across the state, has stopped collecting those fees for now. He takes offense to the suggestion that coroners are breaking the law. Instead, he says most coroners who have ben charging the fees are simply following long-standing guidelines that have been in place for years.  

Advertisement

“On behalf of every coroner I take that very personally because nobody is out there intentionally breaking the law, they’ve just kind of done it the way it’s always been done,” said Dr. Cvitanovich.WAFB’s Scottie Hunter if he was blindsided by the opinion.

“I would say so because I would guess that billing a fee for cremation permits is something that predates every coroner in the state I’ll bet because it’s been going on for multiple decades,” said Dr. Cvitanovich.

There is now a question over what happens next and what happens to all the fees that have already been collected over the years. Clark says his funeral home sees roughly $20,000 in fees for cremations every year from just one coroner’s office. He believes those families that have faces fees over the years should be reimbursed but he admits getting that money into the right hands and tracking down who is even owed a possible refund will be a tall order.  

“Certainly it’s going to be difficult because you think about that we’ve serviced a family maybe 10 years ago and the individual that took care of those arrangements that were the legal next of kin has now passed away. It may be difficult to try to find out who their heirs are or if there’s an estate,” said Clark.

That is the one thing Dr. Dvitanovich agrees with. He too thinks it would be hard to issue any of those refunds but he says it’s way too early for refunds to even be on the table.

Advertisement

”As far as whether or not those fees need to be reimbursed, I think the first thing we need to do is find out if they are actually illegal,” said Dr. Cvitanovich.

For now, there’s a push to get clarification on the Attorney General’s opinion. Dr. Cvitanovich says while that process plays out, he would also like to see lawmakers take up the issue and actually make the law more clear.  

“It was never really a significant issue but it is now and so I would hope that the legislature addresses it,” said Dr. Cvitanovich.

Right now, only two coroner’s offices are continuing to charge those fees, Orleans and St. Tammany.

Click here to report a typo.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Louisiana

Louisiana immigration judge says pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil can be deported

Published

on

Louisiana immigration judge says pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil can be deported


An immigration judge in Louisiana has decided that Mahmoud Khalil, the former Columbia University graduate student and pro-Palestinian activist, can be deported as a national security risk, the Associated Press reported Friday. Khalil was arrested by immigration officials last month as part of the Trump administration’s crackdown on student protesters it claims support Hamas.

Judge Jamee Comans had given the federal government until Wednesday evening to provide evidence to support why Khalil should be deported, saying she would “terminate” the case if it failed to do so.

An attorney for the Department of Homeland Security submitted a brief memo from Secretary of State Marco Rubio arguing that Section 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes him to personally deport people if he believes their presence “would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.”

While Rubio acknowledged that Khalil’s activities were “otherwise lawful,” he argued that letting him remain in the country would undermine U.S. policy to “combat anti-Semitism around the world and in the United States, in addition to efforts to protect Jewish students from harassment and violence.”

Advertisement

“Condoning anti-Semitic conduct and disruptive protests in the United States would severely undermine that significant foreign policy objective,” Rubio wrote in the undated memo.

According to the AP, Khalil’s attorneys said they plan to seek a waiver to fight the deportation order. A federal judge in New Jersey previously issued a temporary hold barring Khalil’s removal from the country.

How we got here

The ICE processing facility in Jena, La., where Mahmoud Khalil is being held. (Stephen Smith/AP)

Khalil, an Algerian of Palestinian ancestry who received his master’s degree in international affairs from Columbia University last year, was taken into custody by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on March 8 at his university-owned apartment in Manhattan, where he and his pregnant wife live, according to his lawyer.

The 30-year-old, who holds a U.S. permanent residency green card, was transferred to an ICE processing facility in central Louisiana.

Advertisement

Khalil had served as a negotiator for Columbia University students involved in pro-Palestinian demonstrations that followed the Israeli military’s response to the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel by Hamas militants. Khalil bargained with university officials over winding down a tent encampment on campus while pressuring the college to divest itself from Israel.

The role made him one of the most visible pro-Palestinian activists at Columbia and prompted pro-Israel activists to call for his deportation.

Khalil was the first known student protester to be targeted for deportation by the Trump administration.

Trump’s crackdown on foreign student activists

President Trump, at this desk, speaking in the Oval Office.

President Trump in the Oval Office. (Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)

In January, President Trump signed an executive order to “combat anti-Semitism” on college campuses.

And Trump made clear Khalil’s arrest was part of that effort.

Advertisement

“Following my previously signed Executive Orders, ICE proudly apprehended and detained Mahmoud Khalil, a Radical Foreign Pro-Hamas Student on the campus of Columbia University,” Trump wrote in a post on TruthSocial on March 10. “This is the first arrest of many to come. We know there are more students at Columbia and other Universities across the Country who have engaged in pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity, and the Trump Administration will not tolerate it.”

“Many are not students, they are paid agitators,” he added. “We will find, apprehend, and deport these terrorist sympathizers from our country — never to return again.”

The Trump administration has since arrested several other students, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish student at Tufts University who was detained by immigration officials on the street near her home in Somerville, Mass., and taken to an ICE detention center in southern Louisiana.

Rubio said his department has revoked the visas of more than 300 students to date.

“We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not to become a social activist that tears up our university campus,” Rubio said in a recent news conference. “We’ve given you a visa and you decide to do that — we’re going to take it away.”

Advertisement

Arrests alarm free speech advocates

Protesters, holding signs, at a demonstration in support of Mahmoud Khalil in New York.

A demonstration in support of Mahmoud Khalil in New York on March 10. (Yuki Iwamura/AP)

The arrests have been denounced by free speech advocates who say the Trump administration is blatantly retaliating against foreign students whose opinions it does not like.

“The federal government is claiming the authority to deport people with deep ties to the U.S. and revoke their green cards for advocating positions that the government opposes,” the American Civil Liberties Union said in a statement. “To be clear: The First Amendment protects everyone in the U.S. The government’s actions are obviously intended to intimidate and chill speech on one side of a public debate.”

In a letter released by the ACLU, Khalil, writing from the detention center, called himself a “political prisoner.”

“My arrest was a direct consequence of exercising my right to free speech as I advocated for a free Palestine and an end to the genocide in Gaza,” he wrote. “The Trump administration is targeting me as part of a broader strategy to suppress dissent. Visa-holders, green-card carriers, and citizens alike will all be targeted for their political beliefs.”

“This is what happens in a dictatorship, and these are test cases,” Eric Lee, an attorney who represents Momodou Taal, a Cornell University PhD student whose visa was revoked, told NPR. “If the government can get away with doing this to these students, it can do it to everybody in this country. Your citizenship won’t save you.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

First Solar (NasdaqGS:FSLR) Announces New Facilities in Alabama and Louisiana

Published

on

First Solar (NasdaqGS:FSLR) Announces New Facilities in Alabama and Louisiana


First Solar has solidified its status as a major player in the solar industry with significant domestic expansions, reflecting a commitment to strengthen U.S. manufacturing through new facilities in Alabama and Louisiana. These strategic moves, coupled with a recent board change announcement, align with the rapid shifts within the U.S. solar sector. However, the company’s 10% share price decline last week mirrored broader market volatility, as the Nasdaq plunged 4%. While market turbulence likely influenced the price movement, First Solar’s collaborative efforts with Shoals Technologies could have lent some resilience against the overall downtrend.

We’ve spotted 2 possible red flags for First Solar you should be aware of, and 1 of them can’t be ignored.

NasdaqGS:FSLR Revenue & Expenses Breakdown as at Apr 2025

Rare earth metals are an input to most high-tech devices, military and defence systems and electric vehicles. The global race is on to secure supply of these critical minerals. Beat the pack to uncover the 20 best rare earth metal stocks of the very few that mine this essential strategic resource.

The recent developments at First Solar, with its expansions in Alabama and Louisiana, reflect strong intentions to capitalize on domestic demand, potentially enhancing future revenue and earnings despite recent price fluctuations. Over the past five years, the company’s total shareholder return was 204.33%, highlighting the robust long-term performance despite short-term market volatility. In comparison, First Solar underperformed the US Semiconductor industry over the past year, which saw an 8.6% return. These new production facilities, coupled with innovations like the CuRe modules, are anticipated to boost revenue and margins, aligning with the company’s growth projections through 2026.

Advertisement

With the current share price at US$120.38, investors may consider the analyst consensus price target of US$237.62, representing a potential upside of 49.3%. This suggests potential room for growth considering the company’s forward earnings and revenue projections. The market’s reaction to infrastructural and technological advancements could influence analysts’ revenue forecasts, which cite an annual growth expectation of 12.6% per year. As First Solar adapts to ongoing changes within the US policy and market environment, these expansions and technological strides may prove significant in offsetting current margin and profitability pressures.

Evaluate First Solar’s prospects by accessing our earnings growth report.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Louisiana

Louisiana Fire Marshal arrests man for allegedly setting fire to Monroe church

Published

on

Louisiana Fire Marshal arrests man for allegedly setting fire to Monroe church


play

  • A fire occurred at St. Mary’s Number 2 Missionary Baptist Church in Monroe, Louisiana on March 30.
  • Nicky Lavelle Coleman, 49, was arrested and charged with simple arson of a religious building.
  • Surveillance footage allegedly shows Coleman setting the fire.

The Louisiana State Marshal’s Office has arrested a man who allegedly set fire to a Monroe church.

Monroe Fire Department was dispatched just before 2 p.m. March 30 to St. Mary’s Number 2 Missionary Baptist Church at 100 Williams St. on reports of a fire.

Advertisement

Upon arrival, firefighters discovered heavy smoke coming from the church. Within minutes, they extinguished the blaze.

Surveillance video from a business across the street shows Nicky Lavelle Coleman, 49, allegedly setting the church on fire. “We are hoping the public can help us identify and locate the person/persons responsible,” the fire marshal’s office said.

Coleman has been booked into Ouachita Correctional Center on one count of simple arson of a religious building.

Advertisement

Makenzie Boucher is a reporter with the Shreveport Times. Contact her at mboucher@gannett.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending