Connect with us

Austin, TX

We loved Austin but have now fled forever – my deceptively ordinary photo sums up why the city is doomed

Published

on

We loved Austin but have now fled forever – my deceptively ordinary photo sums up why the city is doomed


For Alex Hannaford, one photo sums up went wrong with Austin – the Texas city he adored and made his home for two decades before fleeing in 2020.

It shows the rustic Old BJ Smith Property from the 1850s being dwarfed by the construction of a concrete-and-glass office block, providing desk spaces for the tech workers who flow to the city.

Hannaford, 50, said the image captures how Austin has lost its quirky, offbeat charm and started to resemble every other US boomtown with populations of around one million people.

‘What’s different about it anymore?’ he told DailyMail.com.

Advertisement

‘If you’ve got posh restaurants, private members’ clubs and chain stores, what differs it from any other city in the United States? When I moved here, it was very different, low-rise, and distinct.’

British writer Alex Hannaford lived in Austin, Texas, for nearly two decades, and says gentrification ruined its charm  

This photo of the Old BJ Smith Property being dwarfed by office construction encapsulates Austin's growing pains, says Hannaford.

This photo of the Old BJ Smith Property being dwarfed by office construction encapsulates Austin’s growing pains, says Hannaford. 

Hannaford reveals how he fell in love with Austin during a 1999 road trip and moved there soon after in his book Lost in Austin – The Evolution of an American City.

Back then it was a ‘weird, intoxicating mix of frontier town, hippie holdout, and indie mecca, with too many Mexican restaurants to count,’ he writes.

‘This was the city of reinvention: exciting, bubbling with opportunity and optimism — a kitsch, retro America-lite where you could forget the real world outside.’

As well as beatniks and hipsters, Austin was home to freethinking libertarians, iconoclasts, and even such conspiracy theorists such as Alex Jones.

Advertisement

Hannaford was working there as a freelance journalist when he met his wife, from Dallas, during Austin’s music and film extravaganza, South by Southwest (SXSW), in 2003.

The couple bought a cute, three-bedroom home and in 2012 had a daughter.

The book charts how Austin went from a melting pot of crunchy artists and musicians to a gentrified tech industry hub, complete with high-rises, snarling traffic and skyrocketing property prices.

When Hannaford, then a 24-year-old from London, rolled into town in a Pontiac Firebird, Austin was home to fewer than 600,000 people and locals typically spent $180,000 on a home.

Today, that number is nearing one million, and the average home changes hands for $550,000.

Advertisement

It is now pockmarked by rampant development, environmental decay, racism, gun proliferation, water depletion, and homelessness, claims the 240-page book.

Locals embraced the mantra ‘Keep Austin Weird’ and fought to maintain the city’s free-thinking spirit.

But for Hannaford, the kookiness was evaporating, and within a few years Austin became an enclave for the rich.

The Old BJ Smith Property dates back to the 1850s and is one of the oldest homes in Austin

The Old BJ Smith Property dates back to the 1850s and is one of the oldest homes in Austin

Hannaford's 240-page book Lost in Austin was released earlier this month

Hannaford’s 240-page book Lost in Austin was released earlier this month

This eclectic taco restaurant shuttered in 2020 in another sign of Austin's fading character

This eclectic taco restaurant shuttered in 2020 in another sign of Austin’s fading character 

Actor Matthew McConaughey is among Austin's most celebrity residents, seen here at a book event in the city in May 2022

Actor Matthew McConaughey is among Austin’s most celebrity residents, seen here at a book event in the city in May 2022   

Hannaford and his daughter kayaking on the Colorado River in Austin. Nearby water holes have dried up in recent years due to climate change, he says.

Hannaford and his daughter kayaking on the Colorado River in Austin. Nearby water holes have dried up in recent years due to climate change, he says. 

Its well-heeled residents included staff of newcomer tech firms Apple, Meta, and Google, and celebrities, from actor Matthew McConaughey to podcaster Joe Rogan and filmmaker Robert Rodriguez.

The ‘hippie in flip-flops chowing down on Tex-Mex watching a blues band in some dive bar’ was gone, says Hannaford’s book.

Advertisement

Now, it’s a ‘guy in a pressed shirt, Patagonia vest, and Allbirds sneakers eating Japanese-barbecue fusion in an air-conditioned new-build.’

Hannaford particularly laments the decline of Austin’s lauded music scene.

In the 1990s, open doorways along Sixth Street led to live clubs with raucous and eccentric bands.

But big-time bands and solo acts have squeezed out local musicians, and the beloved SXSW festival has changed forever, he says.

Nowadays ‘working musicians couldn’t afford to park downtown to unload their gear, let alone live there,’ Hannaford writes.

Advertisement

‘For older Austinites who helped cement its reputation as a music city back in the day, what Austin has lost, as far as they’re concerned, is irretrievable.’

Austin’s transformation mirrors the growing pains of America’s other artistic hubs — from Portland, Oregon, to San Francisco, Seattle, and Brooklyn, in New York City, he says.

But Hannaford wasn’t priced out by Austin’s property bubble — he was a homeowner who watched his house triple in value as the city grew.

He says he was pushed away by Texas’ lax gun laws and his horror over active shooter drills at his daughter’s school – which have become normalized in many parts of the US.

Country singer Lyle Lovett performing at Austin's university campus in 2000, when Hannaford says the city had a more eclectic music scene

Country singer Lyle Lovett performing at Austin’s university campus in 2000, when Hannaford says the city had a more eclectic music scene 

The podcaster Joe Rogan is another of Austin's famous residents, seen here at a UFC Fight Night event at Moody Center in June 2022

The podcaster Joe Rogan is another of Austin’s famous residents, seen here at a UFC Fight Night event at Moody Center in June 2022

Austin has also been a hub for people with unorthodox views, including the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, seen here at a courthouse in August 2022.

Austin has also been a hub for people with unorthodox views, including the conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, seen here at a courthouse in August 2022.

Hannford first came to Austin during a road trip in a Pontiac Firebird in 1999

Hannford first came to Austin during a road trip in a Pontiac Firebird in 1999

Hannaford and his family now live in upstate New York, where he writes, chops wood and tootles around his lot on a riding mower.

Hannaford and his family now live in upstate New York, where he writes, chops wood and tootles around his lot on a riding mower.

The family was also driven out by the climate change and central Texas’ increasingly frequent 100°F scorcher days.

Advertisement

In the early 2000s, Austinites could take short drives and swim in nearby rivers, lakes, and watering holes, he says.

But the booming population and climate change sucked up groundwater supplies and saw some of the area’s natural beauty spots dry up.

The family were effectively ‘climate refugees,’ he says. So they sold up and moved nearly 2,000 miles to a village in upstate New York.

Hannaford writes books, his wife is a remote tech worker, and their daughter is at high school in a state with ‘more sensible gun laws,’ he says.

The family enjoys having the four seasons. Hannaford chops wood and tootles around the lot on a riding mower.

Advertisement

‘Although we left Austin and I feel the changes have been too profound, I’ll always love the place,’ he says.

‘It’s where I met my wife, and where our daughter was born.’



Source link

Austin, TX

Severe storms possible in Austin midweek. Here’s what to expect and timings.

Published

on

Severe storms possible in Austin midweek. Here’s what to expect and timings.


So far this month, Austin’s main weather observation site at Camp Mabry has recorded 0.7 inch of rain, but the year overall has been dry. Since Jan. 1, we’ve recorded just over 2.5 inches of rainfall, which is about 2.75 inches below normal at this point in the year.

While the weekend rain wasn’t exactly a drought-buster, we can still keep our hopes high — or, in the words of a classic infomercial: “But wait … there’s more!” 

Morning: We’ll wake early Tuesday under dark and cloudy skies, as the sun doesn’t rise in Austin until 7:46 a.m. because of daylight saving time. Temperatures will be near 70 degrees, but don’t expect the same foggy start we saw Monday. Winds will be a bit gusty out of the south, which will help keep the low-level moisture mixed and prevent it from settling in and creating a layer of fog. 

Midday: Sprinkles or light showers are possible through midday, but the heavier rainfall will hold off during the morning. The upper-level low pressure system approaching from the west will help produce active weather across West Texas during the first half of Tuesday. 

Advertisement

Afternoon: However, across Central Texas an atmospheric lid, known as a capping inversion, will remain in place until surface temperatures warm up enough for rising air to break through the “cap.” Once that happens, the atmosphere will gradually destabilize through the afternoon and evening, allowing rain and thunderstorms to develop.

Breezy south winds will continue throughout the day, with gusts up to 25 mph. Afternoon temperatures are expected to climb into the upper 70s and lower 80s.

Once the cold front transits east of Austin on Wednesday, drier and cooler weather will settle in for the rest of the work week before 80-degree afternoon temperatures reemerge next weekend.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas Mother Is Exonerated After 22 Years for a Crime That Never Happened – Innocence Project

Published

on

Texas Mother Is Exonerated After 22 Years for a Crime That Never Happened – Innocence Project


(Austin, TX – March 9, 2026) Carmen Mejia was exonerated today after Travis County District Court Judge P. David Wahlberg dismissed a 2003 murder charge against her, following a ruling from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) — the state’s highest criminal court — overturning her convictions and finding that new evidence established that Ms. Mejia is “actually innocent.” 

The CCA’s decision, on Jan. 22, 2026, found Ms. Mejia actually innocent of the death of a 10-month-old infant in her care who was critically burned from scalding bathwater due to a water heater in her rental home that lacked safety technology. Ms. Mejia has spent the last 22 years in prison for what the State claimed to be murder but now agrees was, in fact, a tragic accident.

“While we are overjoyed that the courts finally recognize that Ms. Mejia is innocent, this grave injustice should have never happened in the first place,” said Vanessa Potkin, Ms. Mejia’s Innocence Project attorney. “Ms. Mejia is a woman of immeasurable strength, who has relied on her deep faith to withstand a traumatic period of her life that most people wouldn’t be able to survive. Her case is far from isolated. There is a clear pattern in our criminal legal system of wrongly accusing caregivers when a child in their care dies from an accident or illness, particularly when those caregivers are women of color. We have seen too many cases like Ms. Mejia’s where false and outdated medical testimony lead to wrongful convictions, and there are undoubtedly thousands more people still wrongly imprisoned because of such testimony.”

“Ms. Mejia, today we acknowledge that our office failed you,” said Sarah Byrom, Assistant District Attorney, Travis County District Attorney’s Office. “The State pursued and obtained a conviction against you for what we now understand was a tragic accident and that failure cost you over 20 years of your life. Nothing that I say, and nothing that we do in this courtroom today can restore the time that was taken from you or undo the pain and separation that you and your children have had to endure.”

Advertisement

 

A Tragic Accident and Lost Evidence

On July 28, 2003, Ms. Mejia was at home with her four children and babysitting a 10-month-old when the fatal accident occurred. While Ms. Mejia was nursing her youngest child, her eldest daughter tried to bathe the baby. The water heater in Ms. Mejia’s rental home lacked the now-standard safety features, allowing the tub water to quickly reach 147.8 degrees Fahrenheit. Within seconds of being exposed to this high water temperature, the baby suffered third-degree burns. He died in the hospital later that day as a result of complications from the burn injuries.

Instead of recognizing this as the terrible accident it was, police arrested Ms. Mejia for murder. 

A combination of factors — in particular, invalid medical testimony and lost evidence supporting Ms. Mejia’s account of the accident — contributed to her wrongful conviction. No medical burn expert was called to testify at trial. Instead, the prosecution’s experts — a medical doctor and retired law enforcement investigator — incorrectly asserted that the baby’s injuries could only have been caused by an adult intentionally holding the child down in scalding water.

Advertisement

As part of their investigation, forensic interviews were conducted with Ms. Mejia’s children after the incident. The children’s statements, which were video recorded, supported Ms. Mejia’s account that this was an accident. However, the recordings disappeared from law enforcement’s custody before the trial, as a result, the jury never heard these corroborating accounts.

At trial, the State presented no evidence of prior mistreatment or violence. Ms. Mejia had no criminal history. 

Ms. Mejia steadfastly maintained her innocence, including during her testimony at trial. Nonetheless, the jury returned a guilty verdict, convicting her of murder and injury to a child. She was sentenced to life in prison, lost her parental rights, and did not see her four children again for over two decades.

In this case from the start, the worst was assumed: That this was an intentional act,” said Collin Bellair, Assistant District Attorney, Travis County District Attorney’s Office, at today’s hearing. “We could not have been more wrong, and it turned a tragic accident into a wrongful conviction.”

 

Advertisement

A Conviction Collapses Under Faulty Science

One significant person who believed in Ms. Mejia’s innocence during her trial was Art Guerrero, the courtroom bailiff. Ms. Mejia’s testimony and her vehement declarations of innocence stayed with Mr. Guerrero years after her conviction, so much so that he contacted the Innocence Project, the District Attorney’s Office, and another judge, urging a reexamination of Ms. Mejia’s case.

“From the time that you were taken from this place to prison, you were not forgotten … you were not forgotten. There was somebody thinking about you the whole time and just trying to figure out what to do and how to do it,” Mr. Guerrero said, addressing Ms. Mejia at her exoneration hearing.

After the Innocence Project took up Ms. Mejia’s case in 2021, the Conviction Integrity Unit of the Travis County District Attorney’s Office also agreed to investigate her innocence claim. During the reinvestigation, they located Ms. Mejia’s children, who had been adopted in a closed adoption and had spent the past two decades wondering what happened to their birth mother, even hiring a private investigator to no success.

In 2024, the Innocence Project filed a writ of habeas corpus in Travis County District Court, challenging Ms. Mejia’s wrongful conviction. Over the course of a year, Judge Wahlberg conducted hearings at which multiple experts presented evidence that — contrary to what the State’ presented at trial — the child’s injuries were consistent with an accidental scalding.

Advertisement

Wendy Shields, senior researcher at the Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy — whose decades of research have focused on preventing injuries in the home with particular expertise in scald burns — testified in 2024 that the water heater in Ms. Mejia’s rental home lacked recommended plumbing safety features designed to prevent scald injuries. She explained that this situation is common in homes built prior to the 1980s, like Ms. Mejia’s, before building safety codes were revised to require tap-level protections against scalding. 

“Burn injuries remain a leading cause of accidental injury and death among children. My research estimates that approximately 6,500 children experience tap-water scald burns each year in the United States. Between 2013 and 2022, there were approximately 1,600 tap-water scald injuries involving children under age 18 in incidents where another child was involved,” Dr. Shield said today.

“The technology to prevent these injuries already exists. Devices such as thermostatic mixing valves and other temperature-limiting plumbing protections can dramatically reduce the risk of tap-water scald burns. However, these protections are not consistently required in older housing, leaving many families without basic safeguards. This is particularly concerning for renters, who often do not control the maintenance or temperature settings of the water heater in their homes,” Dr. Shield added.

In 2024, Dr. James Gallagher, a burn surgeon and former director of the William Randolph Hearst Burn Center — one of the nation’s leading trauma burn centers — testified that the tub’s incredibly hot water could have caused accidental burn injuries “in a matter of seconds.” He found that “there is no medical evidence to support that this child’s injuries had to be the result of an intentional act by an adult,” directly refuting the 2003 trial testimony of the State’s experts.

One of Ms. Mejia’s daughters, now an adult who missed out on growing up with her mother, also testified about her recollections of the accident, including turning on the water. 

Advertisement

At Ms. Mejia’s 2003 trial, the State’s medical examiner testified that the death was a homicide based on the available evidence at the time. Dr. Elizabeth Peacock, who performed the autopsy, reversed the manner of death determination from homicide to accidental in 2025 and testified that she would have “ruled this an accident,” if she’d had all of the information now available. When asked during post-conviction proceedings why she decided to take this step, Dr. Peacock responded with great clarity, because “it’s the right thing to do.”  

As a result of the new evidence presented in these hearings, the State’s key experts recanted their testimony supporting the prosecution’s theory that an adult had to have intentionally caused the burns. Judge Wahlberg found that no crime took place and subsequently, the CCA ruled that Ms. Mejia had established her innocence and overturned her conviction.

In dismissing the case based on her “actual innocence,” Judge Wahlberg told Ms. Mejia, “There’s nothing that I can say at this point that will bring back those 23 years. Signing this piece of paper won’t bring it back. There is no amount of money that will ever compensate you for losing the best years of your life. I wish I had that power. What I can do is say to you that there is a reason to hope and believe that your future will be better every day from now on, and I pray that it is so.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Bike MS Texas MS 150 returns April 25–26 with routes up to 96 miles and Leap Ahead option

Published

on

Bike MS Texas MS 150 returns April 25–26 with routes up to 96 miles and Leap Ahead option


Bike MS: ACC Texas MS 150 is rolling back into Central Texas April 25–26 and it’s bigger, better, and bolder than ever. Sponsored by American Communications Construction, this legendary two-day ride is the largest fundraising event in the Bike MS series and brings riders from across Texas together to fund research and support for people living with MS.

Riders of all levels can find a distance to match their goals. Route distances this year include day-one options of 96, 75, 50 and 38 miles and day-two options of 55 and 82 miles. Plus the fan-favorite “Leap Ahead Route” on Day Two that lets riders skip forward and roll into the finish at Texas A&M’s campus amid cheering crowds.

New for 2026 is a scenic 38-mile option launching from Bastrop and winding through Buescher State Park and the Lost Pines, a tree-lined, single-day alternative for riders who want the full Bike MS experience without the two-day format.

The ride funds the National MS Society’s work. Bike MS has helped raise more than $1.4 billion for research, care and advocacy, funding treatments, navigator programs and partnerships that connect people affected by MS to resources. Your miles and dollars make a direct impact.

Advertisement

One of the largest and most visible teams on the ride is Team Tacodeli, founded in 2004 and proudly sponsored by Austin’s Tacodeli. What began as a dozen riders and roughly $10,000 raised has grown into one of the MS 150’s most successful volunteer-led fundraisers. Team Tacodeli consistently ranks among the state’s top fundraisers and has raised millions for the cause. For team details and how to join or volunteer, visit TeamTacodeli.org.

Team Tacodeli also hosts an annual fundraiser (admission $30; kids 12 & under free) featuring a Tacodeli buffet, New Belgium beer and non-alcoholic drinks (while supplies last), a full cash bar, live music, silent auction, kids’ activities and more , with 100% of proceeds benefiting the National MS Society. Riders for the ACC Texas MS 150 are asked to meet a fundraising minimum (Team Tacodeli minimum: $400).

Want to ride, volunteer or support? Register for the ACC Texas MS 150 or learn more about the event and how funds are used at the National MS Society’s website.

Learn more about Team Tacodeli: https://teamtacodeli.org/



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending