Connect with us

Arkansas

Arkansas Could Lead America’s Lithium Production Boom | OilPrice.com

Published

on

Arkansas Could Lead America’s Lithium Production Boom | OilPrice.com


Southwestern Arkansas could be the lithium production hotspot of America the way the Permian is now for oil, as mining companies and oil and gas supermajors are looking to tap more of the domestic U.S. lithium resources to reduce dependence on China.   

Mining firms Standard Lithium and Tetra Technologies, as well as supermajor ExxonMobil, are looking to build lithium extraction capacities in Arkansas and source one of the most important metals for the energy transition via a process called direct lithium extraction (DLE).   

The bromine-rich brines in the Smackover formation in southwestern Arkansas contain as much as 445 parts per million lithium, according to the Office of the State Geologist.

Advertisement

Standard Lithium says it has developed a fully integrated, start to finish, DLE process to selectively extract lithium from Smackover brine and produce battery-quality lithium compounds. Its chief executive Robert Mintak told The Wall Street Journal that the Smackover formation could be the Permian of U.S. lithium production, with better economics.

“The economics will be better, though,” Mintak told the Journal. “And the resource will last longer.”

And, Mintak notes, future demand for the product looks more favorable compared to oil. 

Another company, TETRA Technologies, announced last month a Memorandum of Understanding with Saltwerx LLC to pool some of their respective brine mineral rights in the Smackover Formation, in support of an application for an approximately 6,000 acre Brine Production Unit and potential bromine and lithium extraction from the brine produced from such Brine Unit.   UAE Says OPEC+ Cuts Are Enough To Support The Oil Market

Tetra’s CEO Brady Murphy told the Journal, “It’s going to be a pretty big boom in Southwest Arkansas.”

Advertisement

And then there is Exxon, which is preparing to expand into lithium, in Arkansas. The WSJ reported in May that Exxon had acquired the rights to a lithium deposit in Arkansas, for which it paid $100 million. According to the previous owner of the assets, they may contain up to 4 million tons of lithium carbonate equivalent, which the WSJ said was enough for 50 million EV batteries.

If Exxon, Standard Lithium, and Tetra move forward with plans to extract lithium in the Smackover formation, rural southwestern Arkansas could see an economic boom and become the capital of America’s battery metals mining. The town of Magnolia, Arkansas, could be the next Midland, Texas, for industrial activities.

Besides the economic benefits, a lithium production boom – if the companies get the technologies and economics right – would be a win for any U.S. Administration as domestic supply of one of the energy transition’s key metals would increase.

Demand for lithium is expected to surge as the energy transition progresses, while the West is looking to diversify supply chains away from China’s lithium processing.

Advertisement

Bank UBS expects China to end up controlling nearly one-third of global lithium supply by 2025. Mines controlled by Beijing, not only in China but also in Africa, will see their total lithium output jump more than threefold in just three years—from 194,000 tons in 2022 to 705,000 tons by 2025, UBS said in a note earlier this year.

This surge in supply would raise the Chinese share of global lithium supply to 32% in 2025, up from 24% in 2022, the bank said. 

But direct lithium extraction could help America get a larger share of its lithium from homegrown deposits, including those in Arkansas.

“Direct lithium extraction (DLE) and direct lithium to product (DLP) can be the driving forces behind the industry’s ability to respond more swiftly to soaring demand,” McKinsey & Company said in a report last year.  

“Although DLE and DLP technologies are still in their infancy and subject to volatility given the industry’s “hockey stick” demand growth and lead times, they offer significant promise of increasing supply, reducing the industry’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG) foot­print, and lowering costs, with already announced capacity contributing to around 10 percent of the 2030 lithium supply, as well as to other less advanced projects in the pipeline.”  

Advertisement

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Arkansas

Arkansas lands Courtney Crutchfield

Published

on

Arkansas lands Courtney Crutchfield


Pine Bluff native and Missouri transfer wide receiver Courtney Crutchfield signed with Arkansas on Wednesday.

The former four-star recruit announced his intentions to enter the transfer portal last Thursday and he officially entered last Friday. Crutchfield redshirted this season for the Tigers.

A 6-foot-2, 188-pound pass catcher, Crutchfield recorded 42 receptions for 930 yards and 13 touchdowns his senior season at Pine Bluff. He was committed to Arkansas for nearly seven months before eventually signing with Missouri.

Crutchfield will have four years of eligibility remaining. He was rated by Rivals as the No. 2 overall recruit and No. 1 wide receiver in the state of Arkansas in the 2024 recruiting class.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

FDA phasing out ineffective decongestant | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

FDA phasing out ineffective decongestant | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


WASHINGTON — U.S. officials are moving to phase out the leading decongestant found in hundreds of over-the-counter medicines, concluding that it doesn’t actually relieve nasal congestion.

Phenylephrine is used in popular versions of Sudafed, Dayquil and other medications, but experts have long questioned its effectiveness. Last month, the Food and Drug Administration formally proposed revoking its use in pills and liquid solutions, kicking off a process that’s likely to force drugmakers to remove or reformulate products.

It’s a win for skeptical academics, including researchers at the University of Florida who petitioned the FDA to revisit the drug’s use in 2007 and again in 2015. For consumers, it will likely mean switching to alternatives, including an older decongestant that was moved behind the pharmacy counter nearly 20 years ago.

Doctors say Americans will be better off without phenylephrine, which is often combined with other medicines to treat cold, flu, fever and allergies.

Advertisement

“People walk into the drugstore today and see 55,000 medicines on the shelf, and they pick one that is definitely not going to work,” said Dr. Brian Schroer of the Cleveland Clinic. “You take away that option, and it will be easier for them to self-direct toward products that really will help them.”

The FDA decision was expected after federal advisers last year voted unanimously that oral phenylephrine medications haven’t been shown to relieve congestion.

Experts reviewed several recent, large studies indicating that phenylephrine was no better than a placebo at clearing nasal passageways. They also revisited studies from the 1960s and 1970s that supported the drug’s initial use, finding numerous flaws and questionable data.

The panel’s opinion only applied to phenylephrine in oral medications, which account for roughly $1.8 billion in annual U.S. sales. The drug is still considered effective in nasal sprays, though those are much less popular.

Phenylephrine wasn’t always the top choice for cold and allergy products. Many were originally formulated with a different drug, pseudoephedrine.

Advertisement

But a 2006 law required pharmacies to move pseudoephedrine products behind the counter, citing their potential to be processed into methamphetamine. Companies such as Johnson & Johnson and Bayer decided to reformulate their products to keep them readily available on store shelves — and labeled many of them as “PE” versions of familiar brand names.

PHARMACY NEEDED

Consumers who still want to take pills or syrups for relief will probably need to head to the pharmacy counter — where the pseudoephedrine-containing versions of Sudafed, Claritin D and other products remain available without a prescription. Purchasers need to provide a photo ID.

Beyond those products, most of the other options are over-the-counter nasal sprays or solutions.

Saline drops and rinses are a quick way to clear mucus from the nose. For long-term relief from seasonal stuffiness, itching and sneezing, many doctors recommend nasal steroids, sold as Flonase, Nasacort and Rhinocort.

Advertisement

“These medicines are by far the most effective daily treatment for nasal congestion and stuffiness,” Schroer said. “The biggest issue is they’re not great when used on an as-needed basis.”

Nasal steroids generally have to be used daily to be highly effective. For short-term relief, patients can try antihistamine sprays, such as Astepro, which are faster acting.

Phenylephrine-based sprays will also remain on pharmacy shelves.

SWALLOWING STIFLES AID

The experts who challenged the drug’s effectiveness say it’s quickly broken down and rendered ineffective when it hits the stomach.

Advertisement

“This is a good drug, but not when it’s swallowed,” said Leslie Hendeles, professor emeritus at the University of Florida’s College of Pharmacy, where he co-authored several papers on the ingredient. “It’s inactivated in the gut and doesn’t get into the bloodstream, so it can’t get to the nose.”

When Hendeles and his colleagues first petitioned the FDA on phenylephrine, they suggested a higher dose might be effective. But subsequent studies showed that even doses 400% higher than those currently recommended don’t treat stuffiness.

The FDA and other researchers concluded that pushing the dosage even higher might carry safety risks.

“If you’re using very high doses, the risk is raising blood pressure so high that it could be hazardous to patients,” said Randy Hatton, a University of Florida professor who co-led the research on phenylephrine.

Because of its cardiovascular effects, the drug is sometimes used to treat dangerously low blood pressure during surgery, Hatton noted.

Advertisement
    Decongestant pills containing phenylephrine are displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 
  photo  A decongestant pill containing phenylephrine is displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 
  photo  A decongestant pill containing phenylephrine is displayed for a photograph in Philadelphia on Monday, Dec. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Jonathan Poet)
 
 



Source link

Continue Reading

Arkansas

Sam Pittman breaks down Arkansas' biggest transfer portal needs

Published

on

Sam Pittman breaks down Arkansas' biggest transfer portal needs


With the transfer portal in full swing, Arkansas coach Sam Pittman addressed some of the biggest areas of need for his team. The Razorbacks are coming off of a 6-6 finish in the fifth year under Pittman and looking to boost their roster for another run in 2025.

Speaking with media, Pittman highlighted both the offensive and defensive line as the areas where Arkansas needs to be most aggressive in the portal. He also cited the linebacker group as a the position that the team feels best about, saying the Razorbacks will look to improve its defensive backs room first.

“Offensive line would be one (area of need),” the coach said. “Defensive line would be one. We felt like we were pretty good at the linebacker spots. If you go back and look a couple of years ago, the world was falling because this linebacker (left), that linebacker (left).

“I think we all agreed out linebacker room was a strength for us this year. But that would be probably the least worried about (position). We need some safeties. We need some corners. But I think O-line and tight end’s a big deal. Wide receivers. We’ve got several spots to fill, but off the top of my head, that’s who it would be.”

Advertisement

Since Pittman’s comments, Arkansas has been active in the transfer portal to bring in 13 players. Unfortunately, they’ve also lost 26 more and rank just No. 59 out of 70 teams in On3’s Transfer Portal Team Rankings.

Staying true to to his word, Pittman has brought in four offensive linemen and a pair of defensive lineman through the portal. Former Georgia Tech offensive tackle Corey Robinson II is the highest rated of those additions, coming in as the No. 32 overall player and No. 5 player at his position according to On3’s Transfer Portal Player Rankings.

Arkansas also brought in former Charlotte receiver O’Mega Blake and former Cincinnati cornerback Jordan Young to give it three players ranked in the top 150.

The Razorbacks still have a long way to go to complete their portal class, likely hoping to add some more defensive linemen before it closes later this month. They are looking to make the next push in the SEC next season and the players they’ve gotten so far are a good start.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending