Connect with us

Science

In the Lanternfly War, Some Take the Bug’s Side

Published

on

In the Lanternfly War, Some Take the Bug’s Side

When Lee Weiss, 31, sees a noticed lanternfly — an invasive pest so voracious that it’s the goal of a number of officially-sanctioned smash-on-sight campaigns — he acts swiftly.

He scoops every crimson creature up. Then he fastidiously hides it from any would-be assassins.

Mr. Weiss is amongst an rising group of conscientious objectors to the open-season on the insect. Their causes differ: Some are vegans who discover killing even pests incorrect. Others doubt the risk lanternflies pose or have been repulsed by the glee surrounding lanternfly annihilation. Some individuals are confronted with a flurry of lanternflies, regardless of years of devoted squishing, and have simply given up.

Nonetheless one other few suppose lanternflies are too cute to kill.

The grey-and-red-winged planthopper from China first confirmed up in Pennsylvania in 2014. It has since swarmed throughout a minimum of 11 states together with New York, rising as an agricultural risk, significantly to grape harvests and fruit timber, in line with america Division of Agriculture. A number of research on the encroaching invasion have projected that lanternflies may do upwards of a whole bunch of tens of millions of {dollars} of harm.

Advertisement

Whereas the infestation rages on the East Coast, scientific fashions have predicted that the bugs may unfold throughout the nation, reaching California’s wine nation by the subsequent decade.

To combat again, state and native officers in infested areas have enlisted their constituents in an anti-lanternfly militia. Authorities in battlegrounds comparable to New York, New Jersey and specifically, Pennsylvania, the bugs’ obvious floor zero, have framed the marketing campaign towards the creature as an act of civic responsibility.

Calls to motion to civilians to stamp out the invaders— actually — have been enthusiastically met; in New York, Brooklyn summer season campers have interaction in lanternfly hunts and the state park protect on Staten Island hosted a squishathon in 2021. Final yr, a New Jersey girl threw a lanternfly-crushing pub crawl; one Pennsylvania man developed an app that tracks customers’ kills referred to as Squishr.

Mr. Weiss, a former teacher of Buddhist philosophy who lives in Philadelphia, has not crushed a single lanternfly. “It’s phrased in nearly ethical phrases,” mentioned Mr. Weiss, of the rallying cries gathering the forces aligned towards lanternflies. The Pennsylvania Division of Agriculture runs a hotline to report the bugs at 1-888-4BADFLY, and asks folks to “Kill it! Squash it, smash it … simply do away with it,” on its web site.

Holding up an image of a noticed lanternfly like a needed poster, New York State Sen. Chuck Schumer stood at a information convention close to Central Park earlier this month, calling for extra federal funds for use to combat the scourge.

Advertisement

In New York, officers first noticed the lanternfly on Staten Island in 2020. Since then, it has proliferated, Mr. Schumer mentioned, warning that leafy spots from Central Park to Lengthy Island’s wineries to the farms of Upstate have been in danger. The New York State Division of Agriculture and Markets has put out a success and requested the general public to report any sightings of the bug or to dispatch them.

Jody Smith, 33, a software program developer, to this point has declined. Mr. Smith is vegan, but not an absolutist: he’ll exterminate cockroaches in his house in Manhattan’s Union Sq., he mentioned. However the state-endorsed bloodlust in the case of lanternflies, and the sense that they’re disposable, makes him uncomfortable.

“If somebody was like, ‘Oh we’ve got to kill all of the Pomeranians, folks may really feel quite a bit otherwise about it,” Mr. Smith mentioned.

A spokesman for Sen. Schumer, Angelo Roefaro, inspired New Yorkers to maintain on smashing; he wouldn’t entertain misgivings like Mr. Smith’s. “People who really feel that approach can report them to New York State — or look away.”

These tasked with defending agriculture say sympathy for the lanternfly is misguided. “We will perceive the hesitancy to kill the noticed lanternfly, which seem colourful and innocent,” Chris Logue, director of plant trade for the New York State Division of Agriculture and Markets, mentioned in an electronic mail. “Nevertheless, the harm this invasive species can do in harming vital crops and impacting our meals system is actual.”

Advertisement

She added: “We simply can’t take the prospect.”

Individuals for the Moral Remedy of Animals provided a lower than full-throated protection of the lanternfly. The advocacy group did advise folks, nevertheless, to fastidiously take into account their actions if it entails “killing any residing being, irrespective of how small or unfamiliar,” mentioned Catie Cryar, a PETA spokeswoman.

“Any challenge involving animals and nature must be fastidiously examined to make sure that any drastic motion taken is chosen as a result of it’s the least dangerous one, that it’ll not in the end trigger extra hurt than good,” Ms. Cryar mentioned in an electronic mail.

Regardless of her distaste for the lanternfly, Karen Charles, 31, has gone out of her solution to keep away from harming them. Ms. Charles, a YouTube content material creator from Parlin, in Central New Jersey, was enjoying along with her two-year-old daughter atop a playground slide when she discovered her approach down the ladder blocked by two lanternflies. “It was go down this slide or kill these bugs, and I don’t wish to stomp on them,” she mentioned.

Stopping her was a mixture of worry and pity, she mentioned. “They’re creepy, I hate them, however really feel somewhat dangerous for them — and for me,” mentioned Ms. Charles. She ended up squeezing down the slide alongside her daughter.

Advertisement

Conscious that their opinions are unpopular, these championing lanternflies usually achieve this in secret. Catherine Bonner, 22, a Temple College pupil in Philadelphia, shares her lanternfly sympathies — how the pink spots on their faces seem like they’re sporting blush — solely with shut pals.

The bugs “didn’t ask to be invasive, they’re simply residing their very own life,” Ms. Bonner mentioned. “I’d be bummed if I all of the sudden began present someplace I wasn’t speculated to exist and everybody began killing me for it.”

But even an ardent fan (Ms. Bonner likes to carry them and take them for rides in her palm) is ambivalent about her advocacy. “I really feel like I’m evil saying this as a result of I do know they’re so dangerous for the surroundings,” she added.

Lanternfly defenders argue that the widespread and dear destruction the bugs are supposedly able to has not absolutely materialized. Lanternflies, for instance, don’t seem in a position to kill mature hardwoods, as initially feared. However Shannon Powers, a spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Division of Agriculture, mentioned they aren’t to be underestimated. Some vineyards in southeast Pennsylvania, she mentioned, have misplaced over 90 % of their crops to the bugs.

“Vineyards appeared like they’d been burned to the bottom,” Ms. Powers mentioned.

Advertisement

And simply how efficient all of the smashing is stays a query. Regardless of multiyear pro-squash campaigns, the bugs appear nearly unchecked, and their numbers have grown. A 2021 research by researchers at Lafayette School, in Easton Penn., indicated that eradication efforts specializing in the insect’s skill to breed are amongst these probably to make a dent.

Anne Johnson, a Ph.D. pupil within the division of entomology at Pennsylvania State College who research lanternflies, recommends traps, or scraping off the grayish lots of eggs they appear to put on any floor they will discover.

“I don’t like killing bugs, I really like them,” she mentioned. “However the noticed lantern flies being right here is our accountability. It’s as much as us to repair it.”

Science

In Their Final Moments, a Pompeii Family Fought to Survive

Published

on

In Their Final Moments, a Pompeii Family Fought to Survive

One day in the year 79, Pompeii came under fire. The explosion of nearby Mount Vesuvius sent a mushroom cloud of ash and rock into the atmosphere, pummeling the ancient Roman trading hub and resort in a ceaseless hail of tiny volcanic rocks.

Many residents ran for their lives, trying to find safety with their loved ones before searing volcanic debris buried the estimated 1,500 residents who remained in Pompeii.

In a study published last month in the journal Scavi di Pompei, scientists documented events at one home in the doomed city where a family sought refuge inside a back room by pushing a wooden bed against a door in a vain attempt to stop a flood of volcanic rocks from the sky, known as lapilli.

The small-but-well-appointed residence is known as the House of Helle and Phrixus, after a richly decorated fresco in the dining room. It depicts the mythological siblings Phrixus and Helle escaping their wicked stepmother on a winged ram only to have Helle fall and, ominously, drown in the sea below.

As with many ancient Roman residences, its atrium, an open-roof room centrally located in the home, was used for ventilation and rainwater collection. But on that day, the recess allowed volcanic rock to more rapidly overtake the space. Most Pompeians “had no clue what was happening,” said Gabriel Zuchtriegel, an author of the study and the director of the Archaeological Park of Pompeii. “Many thought the end of the world had come,” he added.

Advertisement

In the years that followed, the hot ash that eventually buried the home solidified and left an imprint that archaeologists filled with plaster to reconstruct the shape of the wooden bed that remained. The technique helps illustrate the horror of the Pompeian dead in their final moments and how perishable everyday items made of wood, textiles and leather were situated in their environments.

The skeletal remains of four people, most likely members of the same family, were identified in the study. The lapilli, which reached heights as high as nine feet in some locations, could not be controlled, and researchers believe the people made a final attempt to escape, leaving the small room in which they had barricaded themselves. They got only as far as the triclinium, the formal dining room where their remains were found.

“The family in the House of Helle and Phrixus probably died when the so-called pyroclastic flow, an avalanche of hot ash and toxic gas, arrived and parts of the building collapsed,” Dr. Zuchtriegel said.

He and his colleagues suggest that the remains of the four people found in the home were from a family that stayed behind and may have included some enslaved members who worked at the residence. Still, archaeologists don’t know for sure if they lived there or simply took refuge after the homeowners had already escaped.

“It’s not certain that the individuals found in the house as victims were part of the family,” said Marcello Mogetta, an associate professor of Roman art and archaeology at the University of Missouri who was not involved in the study.

Advertisement

Among the skeletal remains was a bronze bulla that belonged to a child. The ancient amulets were worn like lockets around the necks of young free boys to shield them from danger until they reached adulthood.

“The amulet was supposed to protect them, so there’s a cruel irony to the fact that it didn’t,” said Caitie Barrett, a professor of archaeology at Cornell University who was not involved in the study.

Bourbon explorers sent by Charles III in the 18th century carried out rudimentary excavations of Pompeii that disturbed the skeletal remains of the victims found in the House of Helle and Phrixus. When they tunneled into the residence in search of valuables like jewelry and artwork, they left behind holes in the walls. These early excavators often had little interest in human remains, either in respecting their preservation, dignifying their deaths or studying their material culture.

But today it’s the human toll that feels most prominent for archaeologists and for many of the visitors who regularly pour into Pompeii. Whether or not the remains belonged to those who were indeed family will be something that researchers may try to uncover through DNA analysis in the near future.

Family or not, it doesn’t change the human tragedy of the story.

Advertisement

“Whatever the nature of their specific relations, they would have been the last people to offer each other comfort at the end,” Dr. Barrett said.

Continue Reading

Science

Antelope Valley residents say they are fed up with rampant dumping, official inaction

Published

on

Antelope Valley residents say they are fed up with rampant dumping, official inaction

Eric Eller likes to ride his dirt bikes through the canyons, dry riverbeds and rocky outcroppings of the Antelope Valley in the high desert north of Los Angeles.

Eller’s an off-the-grid kind of guy with a “Mad Max” vibe — living in a house on a remote plot of land next to a jury-rigged trailer where he tinkers with the remnants and pieces of gutted automobiles, motorcycles and other mechanical debris.

But Eller’s isolation was obliterated last June when dozens of big dump trucks began snaking up the dirt road behind his house and discarding their loads into the nearby dry river canyon. The caravan of waste-haulers continued in the days that followed, often arriving after sundown or in the dark hours before dawn.

Two months later, the convoys abruptly stopped. But not before the makeshift dump’s surface had been camouflaged with dirt and mulch — much of which has since blown away, revealing a 30-foot-deep noxious stew of chopped-up concrete, plastic tampon applicators, faded plastic children’s toys, toothbrushes, syringes, empty caulking tubes, two-by-fours, faded books, weathered Styrofoam pipe insulation, plastic bucket tops and more.

EL MIRAGE, CA – APRIL 18: A truck leaves the Circle Green mulch dump site near El Mirage on Friday, April 18, 2025. (Myung J. Chun / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

Across the Antelope Valley, waste trucks are hauling garbage in from the Greater Los Angeles area and Central Valley towns such as Bakersfield, and then dumping it at makeshift sites. Letters, bills and envelopes visible at several of these waste sites in April showed addresses in Pacoima, Los Angeles and Van Nuys, among other cities.

“Illegal dumping has been a problem in the Antelope Valley for decades,” said Chuck Bostwick, a senior field deputy for Los Angeles County Supervisor Kathryn Barger, who represents much of the area. “But it’s gotten worse in the last two or three years, markedly worse.”

In some cases, such as the site behind Eller’s home, the waste sites are flat-out unauthorized. No landowner has given permission to dump at the site, and the waste consists of construction, household and medical debris.

But in others cases, the waste-haulers have the landowners’ permission to dump — but are disposing waste that should be going to landfills equipped to handle household and industrial waste, lawsuits claim.

Advertisement

In one lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, residents claim that major residential waste-hauling companies including Athens Services, California Waste Services and Universal Waste Systems are dumping hazardous substances without authorization.

The suit claims these companies are disguising the construction and demolition debris as “green waste by unlawfully covering this waste with highly flammable wood chips and other organic waste.”

Eric Casper, the president of California Waste Services, said in an email that his company has “never engaged in dumping waste of any kind, at any time, in the Antelope Valley — legal or illegal. Nor anywhere else.”

A sneaker among the trash dumped at Adobe Mountain

A sneaker among the trash dumped at Adobe Mountain near Lancaster, CA. Locals say this was a canyon before it was filled in to hold trash. Photographed on Friday, April 18, 2025.

Athens Services also denied any illegal dumping, saying in a statement that California’s organics recycling law “encourages sending compostable material to third parties such as farmers and other property owners for beneficial use. This is the material that Athens Services produces and distributes.”

Advertisement

Universal Waste Systems and other companies named in the suit didn’t respond to requests for comment, nor have they filed responses to the federal suit.

Residents say there are more than 100 dump sites scattered throughout the valley — from Lake Los Angeles to the Antelope Valley California Poppy Reserve and north to Mojave — that they contend are unauthorized.

Some of these sites cover hundreds of acres and extend dozens of feet deep. And residents worry that what they can see — from the roads or their homes — is just the tip of a malodorous and malignant iceberg, and that there are probably dozens more they haven’t yet identified.

They complain they are plagued by the toxic, sour and rotten-egg like smells emanating from the discarded trash that cooks in the hot sun and then wafts across their properties.

They also note that the flammable mulch and other materials in the dump, combined with a broiling desert sun, makes for an acute fire risk.

Advertisement

Between 2020 and 2024, the Los Angeles County Fire Department responded to 42 mulch or trash-related fires in the Antelope Valley, ranging from a quarter-acre to 22 acres, ultimately costing taxpayers roughly $1.6 million to extinguish, according to Los Angeles County documents.

Ashley Mroz, who lives in the Antelope Valley community of Neenach, said a mulch-covered dump site spontaneously combusted near her home last summer.

“It had been smoldering for days and days,” said Mroz, one of the plaintiffs in the federal court suit. “We could not even go outside. The smell was so horrific.”

Trash dumped at Adobe Mountain

Trash dumped at Adobe Mountain near Lancaster, CA. Locals say this was a canyon before it was filled in to hold trash. Photographed on Friday, April 18, 2025.

And the scourge has spread beyond the dump sites: Shredded plastic debris can be seen hanging from roadside Joshua trees and creosote bushes. While a midday view across the arid landscape reveals a sea of glimmering, reflective glass shards, like the tips of cresting waves over a vast, brown ocean.

Advertisement

According to Antelope Valley residents and the federal suit, property owners in some cases have given permission — and received payments for — waste to be dumped on their land. Not only do these sites pose a nuisance to the neighbors who live adjacent to or near them, in some cases the material being dumped includes industrial and household waste that can leach into the groundwater.

In its statement, Athens pointed out that property owners sometimes give permission to accept material from multiple waste companies.

“To the extent there are any instances of noncompliant material, we are confident the evidence will demonstrate that it came from another source,” Athens said.

Encounter in Adelanto

On a blustery day in April in the high desert town of Adelanto, local residents watched as two dump trucks offloaded their waste into a San Bernardino county-certified organic waste dump site that is surrounded by eight- to 10-foot high berms of mulch-like waste laced with shredded plastic, insulated wires and chopped-up, plastic children’s toys.

Through a break in the berm, the residents could see that the ground around the recently dumped haul glittered in the sunlight with broken glass, while stalks of what appeared to be insulated wires and rigid plastic stood sentry across the 138-acre expanse.

Advertisement

Two men sitting in a silver GMC pickup truck who were watching the disposal drove over to the gawking residents.

When the residents asked who they were and what the trucks were dumping, the men declined to answer and referred questions to the owner of the property, which The Times later determined to be Kevin Sutton, the owner of a company called Circle Green Inc. Sutton didn’t respond to requests for comment.

As neighbors and a Times reporter and photographer drove away from the site, the silver pickup followed for several miles, tailgating and swerving erratically. The truck turned around only when the small caravan came across a handful of heavily armed California Fish and Game law enforcement agents parked alongside the road.

“It’s the Wild West out here,” said Kristina Brown, a Lancaster property owner who is a party to the federal suit.

A convenient dumping ground

The Antelope Valley’s proximity to Los Angeles and its vast stretches of wild desert make it a prime target for unauthorized dumping.

Advertisement

Sitting at roughly 3,000 feet above sea level, and surrounded by the Tehachapi, Sierra Pelona and San Gabriel mountains, the valley is also divided by jurisdiction — with Los Angeles, Kern and San Bernardino counties all claiming some territory.

“For decades, our illegal dumping was small-time stuff,” said Bostwick, Supervisor Barger’s field deputy. “It was somebody who had a sofa they couldn’t be bothered to take to the dump or they didn’t want to pay, so they dumped it out in the desert. There was commercial dumping then, but it was small time as well.”

But then the state’s waste laws changed, he said.

Starting in 1989, California began requiring municipalities to divert 50% of their waste away from landfill and toward more sustainable waste management solutions, such as recycling and compost. And as Bostwick noted, the vast open spaces of the Antelope Valley beckoned.

In 2022, lawmakers implemented Senate Bill 1383, which initially mandated the diversion of 50% of all food and organic waste away from landfills, but increased to 75% on Jan. 1, 2025. Another 2020 law closed a loophole that had allowed waste companies to dump green waste in landfill, but not have it counted against them. As a result, the need for dumping grounds increased again.

Advertisement

Cities, counties and towns that fail to meet the diversion rates risk fines of up to $10,000 a day.

Mounds of dumped loads

Mounds of dumped loads at this location south of E. Avenue M in Lake Los Angeles. The mounds contain mulch, trash and construction debris. The site was found by a resident who followed a truck onto the dirt roads. Photographed on Friday, April 18, 2025.

Residents, lawmakers and experts say while the spirit of these laws is noble, in many areas of the state, the infrastructure to handle the diverted waste is lacking — especially in Southern California, where there is not nearly enough farmland or water to handle the increased volumes of green waste leaving the region’s cities and suburbs.

As a result, waste companies and haulers — trying to keep costs down and maintain city contracts — are tempted to dump the waste wherever they can, while local governments are reluctant to crack down on violations, Bostwick said.

State regulations have made “disposal much more expensive and hard to deal with, and so that’s increased the financial incentives for companies or individuals to just dump illegally,” he said.

Advertisement

There’s also very little enforcement.

According to Los Angeles County data, while taxpayers spent roughly $1.3 million between 2017 and 2018 to mitigate illegal waste disposal in the region, that number jumped nearly fourfold in 2022-2023, when taxpayers had to foot $4.46 million to mitigate the problem.

At the same time, the number of cases filed with the Environmental Crimes Division of the district attorney’s office decreased from 15 in 2019 to three in 2023.

In February, CalRecycle, the state’s waste agency, finalized emergency orders they say should empower local law enforcement agencies to stop the illegal disposal. Previous regulations only allowed for action against the owner of land where the disposal was occurring. The new orders allow enforcement officials to target parties that are dumping the materials and the facilities that provided the material.

The orders came after officials from the state agency came to visit the area in October 2024 — prodded by Brown, Mroz and other local residents, many of whom have spent years calling state and local officials about the problem.

Advertisement

Enforcement of these orders, however, is the responsibility of the county, said Lance Klug, a spokesman for the state waste agency.

“Local enforcement agencies can best speak to their enforcement actions to date, and any anticipated next steps, now that emergency regulations are in effect,” he said.

The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors adopted a measure last year requiring mulch suppliers to take back any contaminated or illegal waste dumped on private land. The measure, which was sponsored by Barger, also directed county agencies to require “stringent record keeping for all land application operations regarding the origin of all incoming loads and testing results from all mulch suppliers.”

County officials couldn’t immediately provide numbers recently when asked how many enforcement actions had been taken.

“There’s literally no enforcement,” said Brown, who worries that the situation is only going to get worse.

Advertisement

Last month, Eller was riding his dirt bike when he stumbled upon a 60-acre expanse of freshly dumped construction debris, medical waste and compost on a plot of land miles away from any major road.

The tire marks from dump trucks hadn’t yet been blown away by the incessant gales of the high desert. No fences or berms were erected to contain the site, making it impossible to see from the road or along the horizon.

He said it feels like they are living in a real-life game of whack-a-mole: As soon as he and his neighbors identify and report one site, the haulers move onto another.

And they say they feel abandoned by regulators, who they say are doing nothing to stop it.

“It feels like we’re screaming into the wind,” Brown said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

At the Biennale in Venice, a Fantasy Island Imported from Mexico

Published

on

At the Biennale in Venice, a Fantasy Island Imported from Mexico

Mexico City’s small urban farms — known locally as chinampas — practice a sort of agriculture in reverse: instead of bringing water to land as most farms do, chinampas bring land to water.

The chinampas in use today go back about a thousand years, to when Aztec farmers began building rectangular fields on top of vast lakes and growing food for what was then the city of Tenochtitlan. There were tens of thousands of chinampas at one point, arranged in strict grids with narrow canals between them, though many were destroyed or abandoned (along with the rest of the Mesoamerican metropolis) after Hernán Cortés and his invading Spanish soldiers rearranged the civic order in 1521.

But working chinampas continue to exist in the southern Mexico City neighborhood of Xochimilco — despite continuing encroachment by developers and competition from factory farms — operating mostly as family businesses that produce heirloom lettuce, radishes, dahlias and other crops. Lately, the farms’ irrigation-friendly ways are getting fresh attention in a world rocked by climate change and suffering from widespread droughts.

Could other places around the globe borrow the idea of creating “floating islands,” as the fields are sometimes called, which are engulfed by water? A team of Mexican designers, landscapers and farmers believes the ancient technology may be widely adaptable, enough that they will recreate a chinampa for their country’s pavilion at this year’s Architecture Biennale in Venice.

“Chinampas have a simple and intelligent design, created in a collective way that benefits not only people but all of the surrounding living beings, too,” said Lucio Usobiaga, a team member who has spent the last 15 years defending the remaining chinampas through a nonprofit he founded called Arca Tierra.

Advertisement

Mexico’s pavilion is a neat fit for the biennial’s main exhibition, “Intelligens. Natural. Artificial. Collective,” which is intended to show design projects that address climate change in creative ways. The chinampas are at once man-made and organic and can succeed only if there is cooperation among farmers, policymakers and the growing number of tourists who float through on popular canoe tours, gazing at fields of corn and flocks of egrets and pelicans.

Promoting the chinampa as an inspiration for eco-friendly design was an obvious choice for the biennale, team members said. “Venice is also built on water and has the same kind of vulnerabilities that Xochimilco has,” noted Ana Paula Ruiz Galindo, a founder of the design firm Pedro y Juana.

They pointed out that Venice and Xochimilco were added to the list of UNESCO World Heritage sites in the same year, 1987, and both places are island communities navigable by boats and working to balance the positive and negative aspects of tourism.

Venice has its iconic gondolas, while Xochimilco has its trajineras, flat-bottomed vessels, decorated in bright colors and fake flowers that take visitors on party-themed excursions. Both boats are operated by pilots who push them along channels using long poles.

As for how to recreate a chinampa on-site, that took some imagination. And compromise.

Advertisement

The Aztecs constructed their islands over time, using reeds and branches to make fences in the mucky lake bottom. These formed boundaries for multiple layers of sediment and decaying vegetation (and sometimes human sewerage) until the islands rose far enough above water to be farmed. In addition to growing crops like corn, beans and squash — using the traditional milpa agricultural method that naturally preserves nutrients in soil — they planted trees on the corners of the islands to stabilize the land.

Mexico’s pavilion, inside the biennale’s Arsenale complex, will feature a stripped-down version, much smaller than the 500 square meters (0.12 acres) of a typical chinampa. The exhibition will be enhanced by videos produced in Mexico City featuring real chinamperos, as the farmers are called, and bleachers will be installed along the walls. Artificial lighting will replace sunshine.

In the center will be a working garden planted with vegetables, flowers and medicinal herbs. (The crops were started in an Italian nursery and transferred to the Arsenale by boat in mid-April.) They will mature during the biennale, which continues through Nov. 23.

“By the end of the biennale, we will be able to harvest corn and make tortillas,” said Mr. Usobiaga. “Before that, we can harvest beans, squash, tomatoes and chiles.”

Visitors will learn about special seed cultivation techniques that are unique to chinampas and will have the chance to plant seedlings themselves.

Advertisement

In a nod to local agriculture, the chinampa will also employ a version of vite maritata, a practice established in ancient Etruscan agriculture that calls for planting grapes around trees, which serve as a natural trellis system for the vines. The exhibition team sees a link between the two forms of agro-forestry, combining trees and crops into one ecosystem.

“We are going to see this dialogue between two ancient cultures that both have a lot to say about how we can move forward,” Mr. Usobiaga said.

The exhibition team members said they wanted to be careful not to overly romanticize chinampas because they are not easy to duplicate on a scale that could feed a large population today. The farms work in Mexico City because they sit on a lake that lacks an outlet to another body of water, making water levels relatively easy to control. The opposite is true, of course, in Venice, which is on a lagoon close to the sea and always under threat from flooding.

Also, the economics of small farms — high production costs, low yields because of their size — make it difficult to turn a profit. Farmworker wages are generally too low to support people in urban areas, and the backbreaking work of planting and harvesting has lost prestige.

“This is a big problem here, that people, especially young people, don’t want to work the soil on chinampas anymore,” said María Marín de Buen, the team’s graphic designer.

Advertisement

Even in Xochimilco, many chinampas lie fallow because their owners cannot make a living. Some have been turned into soccer fields, which are rented out to the community; others are event venues where people celebrate weddings or birthday parties. Officially, the land is restricted from development, as well as from cattle grazing and the hunting of endangered animal species, though these things happen with alarming frequency.

Still, the team sees something inspirational at play: a connection between nature and the built environment, between existing water resources and the need to construct houses and schools. Architects who visit the biennale may not go on to design large swaths of farmland, but they can replicate the idea on a smaller scale using whatever conditions exist, said Jachen Schleich, a team member who is a principal of the Mexico City architectural firm Dellekamp + Schleich.

“Even if somebody does this in his backyard, he can at least feed his family, or the people on the four floors of his building, Mr. Schleich said. “It could be like a micro-intervention in the landscape or a public space.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending