Connect with us

Science

Cats May Have Gotten Bird Flu From Raw Pet Food. Here’s What to Know.

Published

on

Cats May Have Gotten Bird Flu From Raw Pet Food. Here’s What to Know.

Federal officials who spent the last year grappling with a surge of bird flu infections in cows and people are now confronting a spate of new cases in cats, some of which have died after eating contaminated, uncooked pet food.

Since early December, more than two dozen cases have been confirmed in domestic cats in the United States. Officials have linked some of the cases to virus-laden raw milk, which is known to pose a serious risk to cats. But other cats fell ill after eating commercially available raw pet food — the first known cases in the country linked to pet food.

The cases have already prompted one pet food manufacturer to recall some of its products. And last week, federal officials announced new pet food safety rules and poultry surveillance efforts.

Bird flu “is an emerging contaminant in animal food,” Dr. Steve Grube, a chief medical officer at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, said at a briefing last week.

Still, experts and officials said that there was no need for pet owners to panic. There is no evidence that infected cats have passed the virus on to people, and the cases have been linked specifically to unpasteurized milk and uncooked meat or poultry products.

Advertisement

Most commercial pet foods are cooked or heat-treated. “The heat of processing should be enough to inactivate the virus,” said Phyllis Entis, a food safety microbiologist who worked for Canada’s food safety agency.

But the cat cases highlight the risk of raw food products and raise questions about safety and surveillance gaps in parts of the food supply chain.

“We really don’t have a sense of how widespread this virus is, and we’ve already seen several cases of it sneaking up in the pet food supply,” said Kristen Coleman, an infectious disease researcher at the University of Maryland who is studying bird flu in cats. “It’s a really big vulnerability.”

Although dogs appear to be less susceptible to the virus than cats, and generally experience milder symptoms, contaminated food products pose risks to canines, too.

Here’s what to know.

Advertisement

Experts have long known that cats are susceptible to the virus, which is called H5N1 and is often fatal in felines. There have been sporadic deaths in cats that preyed on wild birds, and there was a spike in cat cases after bird flu began circulating in dairy farms about a year ago. Raw milk from infected cows often contains very high levels of the virus; farm cats that died after lapping up raw milk often served as an early sign of an outbreak.

(Pasteurization, a process in which milk is rapidly heated and then cooled, inactivates the virus and makes milk safe to drink, according to the F.D.A.)

Many of the recent infections occurred in indoor cats that had no known contact with wild birds or dairy farms.

In December, Oregon officials announced that a pet cat had contracted bird flu and died after eating raw, frozen pet food from Northwest Naturals. Samples of the food — the company’s Feline Turkey Recipe — tested positive for H5N1 and the virus was a genetic match for the one found in the cat, officials said.

In an emailed statement, Northwest Naturals said that the company had “deep concern about the accuracy of testing an open bag of pet food, which can contribute to cross-contamination and the introduction of external contaminants that could lead to false positive or inaccurate test results.”

Advertisement

Nevertheless, the company decided to issue a voluntary recall.

California has also reported bird flu infections in cats fed raw milk or pet food. In one Los Angeles household, five cats got sick — and two died — after eating two kinds of raw pet food. Samples from one of the two brands, Monarch Raw Pet Food, tested positive for the virus, officials said.

“Monarch is complying with outreach from local agencies; however, they are not asking for a recall, and to the best of our knowledge there have been no other cases that involve Monarch,” Stephanie Greene, a spokesperson for the company, said in an email.

It’s not entirely clear, and there could be different sources for different cases.

But in an email on Wednesday, an F.D.A. spokesman said that some viral samples from infected cats were closely related, genetically, to samples from turkey farms in Minnesota.

Advertisement

When bird flu is detected in a farmed turkey or chicken, federal regulations require that all birds in that flock be killed. Those birds “are not permitted in any food product at all,” Dr. Eric Deeble, an official at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, said at the briefing last week.

Turkeys and chickens typically become severely ill and die soon after they are infected. But if a bird picked up the virus right before it was slaughtered, or somehow had a very mild infection, it could potentially slip into the food supply undetected, experts said.

The F.D.A., which regulates commercial pet food, requires animal food manufacturers to develop written safety plans, outlining the steps they are taking to ensure that their products are safe for consumption.

The agency “has zero tolerance for pathogens like salmonella or listeria or E. coli or any other potential pathogen in ready-to-eat pet food, and that includes raw pet foods,” said Ms. Entis, who is the author of the book “Toxic: From Factory to Food Bowl, Pet Food Is a Risky Business.”

(The F.D.A. does not have a formal definition for raw pet food, but in general, products marketed as “raw” have not undergone any kind of heat treatment, such as cooking or pasteurization.)

Advertisement

But in practice, Mr. Entis said, the agency does not have a lot of resources for pet food regulation and oversight. “So there’s a lot that doesn’t get caught, or only gets caught when there are illness reports,” she said.

Northwest Naturals said that its pet food was processed at a facility that had a U.S.D.A. inspector on site and also produced food for human consumption. “We remain fully confident in our rigorous quality control and its ability to ensure that our customers’ pets are being served safe and nutritious food,” the company said.

Last Friday, the F.D.A. announced new rules that require companies making pet food containing certain uncooked or unpasteurized ingredients to update their food safety plans to account for the potential hazards of bird flu.

Whether that will result in meaningful safety reforms remains to be seen, Ms. Entis said. Some companies may decide to implement new precautions, such as buying ingredients only from suppliers that regularly test their animals for the virus. But others could say that they’ve reviewed their existing safety plans and determined that no new safeguards are necessary, Ms. Entis said.

Northwest Naturals said it was working to “reanalyze and strengthen our already stringent food safety plan.”

Advertisement

The U.S.D.A. also announced new bird flu surveillance guidelines for large, commercial turkey farms in Minnesota and South Dakota. The guidelines, which could be expanded to other states in the future, call for turkeys to be isolated, monitored and tested for the virus 72 hours before they are sent to slaughter.

The easiest way to protect your pets is to avoid feeding them raw milk, meat or poultry, experts agreed. Those products, which can harbor an array of food-borne pathogens, have always posed health risks, and bird flu ratchets them up. “It’s just not safe right now,” Dr. Coleman said.

Owners whose pets are doing well on a particular raw pet food — and don’t want to or can’t suddenly switch to a new product — can significantly reduce the risks by cooking the food before serving it.

Pet owners should also use this as an opportunity to become more familiar with what’s in the food that they are serving their pets and how it’s processed, Dr. Coleman said. People who have questions or concerns can reach out to the pet food companies directly to ask where they source their ingredients and what food safety measures are in place. “And if they can’t give you an answer to those just very simple questions, then there’s your answer — stop buying their product,” Dr. Coleman said.

People should also try to limit their pets’ contact with birds — and wild animals in general — and report sick and dead birds to local officials.

Advertisement

Science

A Fish That Hitches Rides Where the Sun Doesn’t Shine

Published

on

A Fish That Hitches Rides Where the Sun Doesn’t Shine

When danger calls, some animals bare their teeth. Others take to the sky, or curl into protective balls. But the remora — a fish that often hitches a ride on larger marine animals like sea turtles, whales and sharks — sometimes follows a less dignified strategy: It disappears inside a manta ray’s rear end.

In a study published on Monday in the journal Ecology and Evolution, a team of researchers referred to this newly observed behavior as “cloacal diving.” While many questions about this fishy practice remain, there is one thing the team feels sure about.

“It does not look like the manta ray likes it,” said Catherine Macdonald, director of the shark research and conservation program at the University of Miami and senior author of the new study.

While remoras, also known as suckerfish, have been observed diving into the safety of whale-shark cloacae in the past, this is the first time anyone has documented the behavior in manta rays.

The paper uses seven instances of cloacal diving that took place between 2010 and 2025 across all three known species of manta ray. What’s more, the observations, which were gathered by the Marine Megafauna Foundation, occurred in three separate ocean basins, suggesting that this previously unobserved behavior could be common among rays and the remora species that associate with them.

Advertisement

In some cases, the remora forces itself so far inside the ray’s cloaca that only the very tip of its tail can be seen protruding from the exterior. In others, the ray is not large enough to accommodate the remora’s entire body, and half of the suckerfish hangs out of the ray, like a toddler playing peekaboo beneath a blanket.

“The remoras are pretty much as wide as the cloaca is,” said Emily Yeager, a Ph.D. student at the University of Miami and the lead author of the study. “So it’s fully filling that opening.”

To the researchers’ knowledge, no one has studied how sensitive manta ray cloacae are specifically, though Dr. Macdonald said that her lab would often swab the cloacae of sharks for fecal DNA to better understand what they’d been eating.

“They don’t especially like us sticking a swab up there,” she said. “And that swab is a big Q-Tip compared to a remora.”

While all of this may seem as if it’s a lark — News flash: Fish hides inside another fish’s backside — the findings contribute new information to a topic already hotly debated by scientists: the type of impact remoras have on their hosts.

Advertisement

Traditionally, experts have seen the interaction between remoras and manta rays as either commensal or mutualistic. In a commensal relationship, one animal benefits while the other is neither benefited nor harmed. In a mutualistic relationship, both creatures benefit: The remora gets a free ride and food, while the manta has its skin cleaned of parasites.

But cloacal diving almost certainly changes the equation, said Eleanor Caves, a sensory biologist at Brown University who was not affiliated with the new study. While the remora’s presence inside the ray is most likely brief, it could interfere with waste discharge or reproduction, or even damage the cloaca’s lining. This may mean the relationship between remoras and manta rays sometimes tilts into a parasitic interaction, in which one species benefits and the other is harmed.

While the researchers provide just seven instances of remoras using manta-ray cloacae as their own personal panic rooms, the fact that the animals are so difficult to see once inside suggests that the behavior is under-documented, at the very least.

“It’s really challenging to study these highly mobile relationships in marine systems,” Ms. Yeager said. “Oftentimes when researchers interact with these organisms, it’s just for a second in time, when we’re scuba diving in one location and one passes over us, or we’re fishing in a site and we bring one to our boat.”

“But these relationships persist 24/7, all of the time,” she added. “And we’re seeing just a snapshot.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

Californian exposed to hantavirus aboard cruise ship resides in Bay Area, officials say

Published

on

Californian exposed to hantavirus aboard cruise ship resides in Bay Area, officials say

A Bay Area resident who was stuck on a cruise ship during a deadly hantavirus outbreak has returned to Santa Clara County and is being monitored by health officials.

The Santa Clara County Public Health Department confirmed Sunday that a county resident has returned to California after being exposed to the Andes hantavirus while on the MV Hondius. Three people on board the luxury cruise ship have died, and at least nine others have suspected cases.

The California resident is being monitored in coordination with the California Department of Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the agency said.

CDPH acknowledged in a statement Friday that one California resident had already returned home, but didn’t disclose where they lived. The agency said another Californian remained on the ship as of Friday.

“At this time, there is no known risk to the public in Santa Clara County,” said Sarah Rudman, director of the Santa Clara County Public Health Department.

Advertisement

The CDC has emphasized that the risk to the American public “is extremely low” as American passengers stuck on the ship begin to return home.

Hantavirus is a rare disease typically transmitted to humans through inhalation of particles contaminated with the urine, droppings or saliva from a rodent.

Passengers began disembarking the ship Sunday in the Canary Islands. The CDC says it has sent a team to conduct a risk assessment for each American passenger.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science

What Is Body Dysmorphic Disorder?

Published

on

What Is Body Dysmorphic Disorder?

Mandy Rosenberg, 35, from Brookfield, Wisc., has always drawn attention because of her looks. With her long blonde hair, athletic build and large blue eyes, she was called Barbie by some of her high school peers.

But even though people often told her that she was pretty, she didn’t view herself the same way.

She’d spend hours staring at a tiny blemish on her forehead that was barely visible to others. In her mind, it was a large and unsightly scar, and she would climb on top of her bathroom sink to get as close to the mirror as possible while examining it.

“If I couldn’t make that go away, I didn’t want to live anymore,” she said.

Ms. Rosenberg didn’t know it at the time, but she had both obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder, or B.D.D., a mental health condition that causes people to spend an inordinate amount of time worrying about their appearance — to the point where they may isolate themselves from others and feel imprisoned in their own bodies.

Advertisement

People with B.D.D. not only think they look unattractive but can become convinced that others will reject them because of their flaws.

“They often feel they’re unlovable,” said Dr. Katharine Phillips, an expert in B.D.D. and a psychiatrist at Weill Cornell Medicine and NewYork-Presbyterian.

Those with B.D.D. fixate on perceived cosmetic problems that to others appear unnoticeable or minor. But it’s not about vanity; instead, people with B.D.D. feel extreme anguish that impairs their functioning.

The disorder typically emerges during adolescence and is estimated to affect 2 to 3 percent of the general population, but these numbers may be conservative because the disorder is underdiagnosed.

Studies have shown differences in the brains of people with B.D.D., said Dr. Jamie Feusner, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine. Some of his research has found that in those who have the condition areas of the brain that help us view things holistically are underactive.

Advertisement

This might be part of the reason that people with B.D.D. have trouble viewing their imperfections as small relative to their entire face or body. It’s akin to looking at a window with a smudge on it, then “thinking that the whole window is ruined,” Dr. Feusner said.

Patients with B.D.D. aren’t always aware that their concerns stem from a mental health problem. Instead, they often believe wholeheartedly that they have physical defects.

Because of this, someone might suffer for a decade or more before seeking help from a mental health provider, said Hilary Weingarden, a psychologist in Massachusetts who studies O.C.D. and related conditions.

Instead, “they’re going to their dermatologist and a plastic surgeon and the dentist and the aesthetician,” she said.

But trying to “fix” their appearance only serves to maintain and exacerbate their anxiety in the long run.

Advertisement

People with B.D.D. may withdraw from relationships, avoid attending work or school, and spend an excessive amount of time on repetitive behaviors like examining themselves in the mirror, attempting to camouflage their appearance or seeking reassurance from others.

Chris Trondsen, a therapist in Costa Mesa, Calif., who diagnosed Ms. Rosenberg with B.D.D., said his patients admit to spending hours chatting with artificially intelligent bots, both seeking affirmation and asking what they ought to fix.

“If you ask a human, people are going to get fed up answering the questions,” Mr. Trondsen said.

Mr. Trondsen was inspired to study psychotherapy because of his own struggle with B.D.D. He used to fixate on his complexion and other parts of his body, too. He worried that his nose was too large for his face and that his body wasn’t muscular enough, a form of B.D.D. called muscle dysmorphia.

“I kept thinking I was getting uglier,” Mr. Trondsen said.

Advertisement

Like many patients with B.D.D., he also spent hours checking his body in mirrors and rarely left his apartment. At 21 years old, Mr. Trondsen became so isolated and consumed by his appearance that he attempted suicide, and might have died had his roommate not discovered him. After that, he sought help and was diagnosed with O.C.D. and B.D.D.

It’s common for those with B.D.D. to also have conditions like O.C.D., major depressive disorder, social phobia and substance use disorder. Studies indicate that people with B.D.D. have high rates of suicidal ideation and behavior, too. One meta-analysis found that, across a patient’s life span, about 66 percent of those with B.D.D. will have thoughts of suicide and around 35 percent will attempt it.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for B.D.D. has been shown to lead to remission in more than half of patients. It includes exposure and response prevention, which is meant to help patients gradually confront the things that they have been avoiding or the rituals they have become dependent upon, like hiding parts of their body with clothing or makeup.

Therapists try to help patients view themselves more holistically, emphasizing that there’s more to them than the specific parts of their bodies they scrutinize.

The disorder can also be treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or S.R.I.s., often at high doses. For those with severe B.D.D., both medication and C.B.T. are recommended, Dr. Phillips said.

Advertisement

For Ms. Rosenberg, cognitive behavioral therapy with her former therapist, Mr. Trondsen, gradually helped her condition.

Later, as part of her treatment, she created a diagram showcasing all of the things that contribute to her identity: She is a daughter and a faithful Christian, she loves dogs and cats, she is a teacher, she is caring — she is more than just her looks.

My body, she said, “doesn’t get to determine how I go about my day.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending