Connect with us

Politics

Rep. DesJarlais introduces House version of bill to allow Title 42 to be used to stop drug smuggling

Published

on

NEWNow you can hearken to Fox Information articles!

FIRST ON FOX: Rep. Scott DesJarlais, R-Tenn., has launched the Home model of a invoice that may permit the Title 42 public well being order – which the Biden administration is shifting to carry — for use to forestall the smuggling of medication into the U.S. through the southern border.

Title 42 was applied by The Trump administration in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas it’s a public well being order for use to forestall communicable illnesses, it has develop into a central border coverage for each the Trump and Biden administrations.

HAGERTY INTRODUCES BILL TO ALLOW TITLE 42 TO BE USED TO PROTECT US FROM DRUG SMUGGLING 

The border fence is seen, in Yuma, Arizona, U.S., January 22, 2022. REUTERS/Go Nakamura

Advertisement

Now, with pandemic restrictions winding down throughout the nation, the Biden administration introduced on Friday it should finish Title 42 on Could 23 — elevating fears that the already excessive variety of migrants coming to the southern border will surge within the months forward. Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz just lately mentioned that the U.S. was on monitor to have encountered one million migrants within the first six months of FY 2022.

“After contemplating present public well being situations and an elevated availability of instruments to battle COVID-19 (corresponding to extremely efficient vaccines and therapeutics), the CDC Director has decided that an Order suspending the appropriate to introduce migrants into the USA is not essential,” the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention introduced in an announcement.

BIDEN ADMINISTRATION TO LIFT TITLE 42 AT END OF MAY, DESPITE FEARS OF LOOMING MIGRANT WAVE 

The laws, first introduce by Sen. Invoice Hagerty, R-Tenn., within the Senate, would add an additional circumstance wherein Title 42 can be utilized — to forestall the smuggling of illicit medication into the U.S. 

DesJarlais and Hagerty have pointed to the circulate of opioids, particularly fentanyl, that are available through the southern border after manufacturing in Mexico after being produced with precursors from China.

Advertisement

“It’s an necessary situation as a result of we’ve seen document numbers crossing our borders and that was slowed down resulting from Title 42, however the opioid epidemic is killing within the neighborhood of 100,000 individuals a 12 months,” DesJarlais informed Fox Information Digital in an interview. 

“To place into perspective, that is as many individuals in a single 12 months we have misplaced to drug overdoses than we have now to fight casualties relationship again to the Korean Battle, so it actually must be thought of a public well being emergency, and it places a instrument within the arsenal of our Border Patrol brokers to stem the unprecedented circulate of illegals throughout the southern border.”

The laws permits for the usage of Title 42 when it’s decided that “by motive of the existence of considerable illicit drug smuggling from a overseas nation, there’s severe hazard of the introduction of such medication into the USA, and that this hazard is so elevated by the introduction of individuals and property…”

REPUBLICAN STATES SUE TO STOP BIDEN ADMIN’S LIFTING OF TITLE 42 BORDER POLICY 

DesJarlais, himself a doctor, mentioned that day by day opioid deaths throughout the nation are actually exceeding COVID-19 deaths, and that it’s killing Individuals because the cartels embody fentanyl of their provides of different medication, together with marijuana.

Advertisement

“Its such a harmful drug as a result of it’s so potent, its 60-100 occasions for potent than morphine which is harmful when improperly used, but it surely’s being disguised by the cartels as different medication and being added and derivatives are being made that may be harmful and unpredictable,” he mentioned.

The laws is one among quite a lot of strikes by Republicans to push again towards the Biden administration’s plans to finish Title 42. However DesJarlais famous that quite a lot of Democrats, together with these within the border states, have additionally sounded the alarm concerning the transfer — and mentioned it must be a bipartisan situation.

“I simply have a tough time perceive why Democrats, Republicans, anybody would wish to permit a system that’s so beneficiant permitting a million every year to to migrate right here legally would flip a blind eye to letting one other million in particularly after we know that there is crime, intercourse trafficking and…drug trafficking coming in and killing Individuals,” he mentioned. “So it should not be a partisan situation, it’s a problem of nationwide safety.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

Chip Roy plans House discussion on 25th Amendment regarding Biden’s mental fitness

Published

on

Chip Roy plans House discussion on 25th Amendment regarding Biden’s mental fitness

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, plans to bring up options under the 25th Amendment in terms of President Biden’s fitness during a meeting with House Republicans on Tuesday.

Roy told Fox News he believes Republicans need to have a position on where they stand regarding Biden’s competence.

Advertisement

Section 4 of the 25th Amendment provides a series of steps for removing a president from office if he or she becomes incapacitated.

But a resolution on the 25th Amendment cannot just be presented to the House floor immediately.

CRITICS PILE ON BIDEN FOLLOWING ABC INTERVIEW, BLAST HIS REFUSAL TO COMMIT TO COGNITIVE TEST: ‘DISQUALIFYING’

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, plans discuss the 25th amendment.  (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

The bill would not be “privileged” and go straight to the front of the legislative line because it deals with the executive branch and not Congress.

Advertisement

Impeachment, on the other hand, could be considered “privileged” because those powers are enumerated in the Constitution as being under the purview of Congress.

PRESIDENT BIDEN FACES THE MOST CONSEQUENTIAL WEEKEND OF HIS POLITICAL CAREER

Biden and the first lady

Democratic Party donors in Hollywood are reportedly saying that they will stop donating to the party if Biden isn’t replaced as a presidential candidate. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Any resolution on the 25th Amendment would need to go through committee first, a senior House Republican leadership source told Fox.

Roy’s plan comes a week-and-a-half after House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., spoke about the cabinet weighing in on the 25th Amendment regarding Biden.

Rep. Byron Donalds, R-Fla., was asked by “Fox News Sunday” if Biden was well enough to continue to serve as president and if he would support a move on the 25th Amendment.

Advertisement

Daniels said he did not believe Biden has the capability to serve out the rest of his term, or even run for president.

He also told the host he would support a move on the 25th Amendment.

“I do agree we do have a responsibility to make sure that the occupants of the Oval Office has the mental capabilities to do that job, but that responsibility relies with the Vice President Kamala Harris and with the cabinet,” Daniels said. “What we are seeing is that they have decided to cover up for Joe Biden to protect their radical agenda as opposed to doing what is in the best interest of the American people. If that resolution hits the floor, I would vote for it 100 percent. But at the end of the day, Kamala Harris and the cabinet, they have a responsibility to the American people. They have a constitutional duty to the American people.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Analysis: 'Dodged a bullet.' In France, voters deny far right a win. But what now?

Published

on

Analysis: 'Dodged a bullet.' In France, voters deny far right a win. But what now?

Strangers in Paris cafes raised joyful toasts to one another. In tight-packed crowds, people hugged and wept. A speeding bicyclist trailed a flapping French tricolor. Fireworks hissed and popped.

In Sunday’s parliamentary election, the French far right made a thunderous knock at the gates of power — but one that seemingly dwindled at the last moment into insistent tapping.

The National Rally, whose ascendancy was widely feared after it topped the field in first-round voting a week earlier, fell back to a third-place finish, as vote tallies pointed to a divided Parliament, with no bloc achieving a clear majority.

The uncertainty of what would come was not lost on the revelers in Paris, but they were for the moment thrilled that voters had staved off what had been the specter of France’s first far-right government since the dark Nazi-collaborationist days of World War II.

Advertisement

People celebrate election results in Paris on July 7, 2024.

(Aurelien Morissard / Associated Press)

A newly formed coalition of leftist and environmental forces was the night’s surprise success story, deemed to have garnered the largest share of parliamentary seats, ahead of President Emmanuel Macron’s centrists. A final official tally was not expected until later Monday.

“C’est Ouf,” was the headline in Monday’s early editions of the left-leaning Liberation newspaper — crazy, in slang usage — superimposed on a photo of a gigantic gathering in the Place de la Republique, a historic central Paris square.

Advertisement

The political disarray comes less than three weeks before the start of the Summer Olympic Games, although visitors to Paris were unlikely to experience much in the way of disruptions beyond the obstacle course that already exists in the city center.

On election day, many among the throngs of tourists navigating the barricades and blockages were unaware of the vote, or had heard about it only in the vaguest of terms.

For the French, though, the contest was all-consuming.

Into the wee hours of Monday, long after the last late-summer evening light had left the sky, there was widespread rejoicing — but already, a dawning sense of the deadlock and instability that will almost surely follow the divided result.

“I think you can say ‘dodged a bullet,’ yes?” said Leslie Laurent, a Parisian retail manager in her 50s. She said she had supported Macron’s bloc, but was relieved that the far right had not managed a decisive triumph.

Advertisement

The vote’s stakes were reflected in unusually high tensions surrounding the race — and by a turnout that authorities described as the highest in decades for a parliamentary contest.

The government sent 30,000 police officers into the streets on election day, and dozens of candidates reported having been physically attacked during the run-up to the balloting.

Macron, whose term does not expire until 2027, can remain in his post, although some opponents were already calling on him to step down.

His handpicked prime minister, Gabriel Attal, announced almost immediately after the release of the first solid projections that he would turn in his resignation — although Attal left open the prospect of remaining in his post until a new government can be formed, which could be a long and difficult process.

The National Rally — a successor party to the National Front, a xenophobic grouping that for decades was relegated to France’s political fringe — had high hopes heading into the vote, expressing confidence that it could even achieve an absolute majority and form a government.

Advertisement

But although it fell far short of that aim, the National Rally dramatically increased its number of parliamentary seats — a state of affairs that is likely to result in considerable hand-wringing once the initial euphoria wears off.

And not everyone, of course, is rejoicing.

The National Rally made its name with deep antipathy toward immigration and scorn for the European Union, but part of its appeal springs from hard-edged dissatisfaction with the cost of living and economic inequalities within France — sentiments shared even by many who felt that voting for the party would be an affront to France’s democratic values.

A crowd of people raise fisted hands

Supporters of the far-left France Unbowed party react in Paris as a coalition on the left won the most parliamentary seats in the snap election.

(Thomas Padilla / Associated Press)

Advertisement

Initial reaction from Macron’s camp was muted. He made no immediate personal appearance, with his office saying he would ensure that the “sovereign choice of the French people will be respected.”

After the June 30 first round of voting in which the National Rally came in first — which itself followed France’s June 9 elections for the European Parliament, in which the National Rally also performed best — centrist and leftist forces joined together, as they have in the past, to create a “Republican front.”

That military-sounding endeavor is so named because it was intended to safeguard the French republic by blocking the far-right juggernaut.

The far right responded to the initial results with defiance. Its president, Jordan Bardella, the 28-year-old who had hoped to become the next prime minister, referred darkly to “dangerous electoral deals” made to stymie the National Rally’s drive.

Leaning into the party’s narrative that it champions the forgotten against a powerful elite, Bardella told supporters in Paris that these machinations had “deprived” National Rally supporters of the government they wanted.

Advertisement

Calling the early elections had been a huge gamble on Macron’s part, and there was mixed opinion as to whether he had won his bet. He had counted on French voters repudiating the National Rally as a governing force, even if they were willing to lend it a protest vote.

Still, the battle was a deeply damaging one — and likely to leave Macron, deprived of a parliamentary plurality, a diminished figure in global affairs, including causes such as championing Ukraine and fighting climate change.

During the campaign, Macron described the far left as being as dangerous as the far right — a dynamic of enmity that will make it difficult for his centrists to secure even temporary tactical alliances with leftists.

At least at this juncture, none of the main blocs appeared willing to work with one another, and the successful leftist grouping in particular could be prone to infighting.

Marine Le Pen, the National Rally leader who did not contest this election but is expected to run for president in 2027, suggested in a post-vote television interview that it had taken the combined efforts of the left and center to keep her party down.

Advertisement

In the night’s setbacks, she told France’s TF1, she saw “the ferments that are those of tomorrow’s victory.”

A man in a dark suit and tie, arms crossed, stands next to a woman in a white outfit in the midst of a crowd

Supporters of the far-right National Rally react at their Paris headquarters after the release of vote projections that the party would come in third.

(Louise Delmotte / Associated Press)

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Biden notes 'world's looking to America' as he faces scrutiny before hosting NATO summit

Published

on

Biden notes 'world's looking to America' as he faces scrutiny before hosting NATO summit

President Biden, reeling from a disastrous debate performance and calls to step aside, addressed a Black church service in Pennsylvania on Sunday, acknowledging the “world’s looking to America.”

Speaking from a stage at Mount Airy Church of God in Christ in northwest Philadelphia, the 81-year-old Biden laughed off concerns about his age, joking, “I know I look 40” but “I’ve been doing this a long time.”

“I, honest to God, have never been more optimistic about America’s future if we stick together,” Biden said.

The president, later on in his remarks, also addressed the upcoming NATO summit in Washington, D.C.

NATO SECRETARY GENERAL DODGES QUESTIONS ABOUT BIDEN’S MENTAL FITNESS

Advertisement

President Biden speaks at a church service at Mt. Airy Church of God in Christ, Sunday, July 7, 2024, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

“I’m about to host the NATO nations in Washington. We put them together,” Biden said. “The world’s looking to us. Not a joke. The world is looking to America not to carry their burden, but to lead their hopes.” 

“When I ran for the first time for president, I said something basic. I said, we have to bring back dignity and hope in America, number one,” the president added, wrapping up his remarks. 

“Number two, we have to give working class and middle class people, like the family I came from, a shot and build the economy from the middle out and the bottom up, not the top down,” Biden said. “And thirdly, we must unite America again. That’s my goal. That’s what we’re going to do. God bless you all and may God bless our troops.” 

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg was asked during an appearance on CBS’ “Face The Nation” about whether Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., was accurate in voicing concerns that world leaders don’t trust Biden to be in command of the job. 

Advertisement
Biden at Philadelphia church

President Biden and Bishop Ernest C. Morris Sr. during a church service at Mt. Airy Church of God in Christ, Sunday, July 7, 2024, in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

TOP WHITE HOUSE AIDE URGES STAFF TO TUNE OUT ‘NOISE’ AND FOCUS ON GOVERNING DURING DEBATE FALLOUT

“I think it’s important for NATO to stay out of that kind of domestic discussion,” Stoltenberg said. “They’re of course important for the United States, but NATO should not be part of it. What matters for NATO is the decisions. What to do together. And just for instance, on defense spending, which has been a big issue for the United States for many years under different presidents. When we made the pledge 10 years ago to increase defense spending, only three allies spent 2% of GDP on defense. This year, it’s 23 allies.” 

Biden with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg last summer

NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg speaks with President Biden during a meeting of the NATO-Ukraine Council in Vilnius, Lithuania, July 12, 2023. (AP Photo/Pavel Golovkin, File)

Biden and his NATO counterparts are meeting in Washington this week to mark the 75th anniversary of the world’s biggest security organization just as Russia presses its advantage on the battlefield in Ukraine.

The three-day summit, which begins Tuesday, will focus on ways to reassure Ukraine of NATO’s enduring support and offer some hope to its war-weary citizens that their country might survive the biggest land conflict in Europe in decades. NATO’s day-to-day work is led by Stoltenberg, the former prime minister of Norway, until he is replaced as secretary-general on Oct. 1 by outgoing Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Continue Reading

Trending