Connect with us

World

Borrell's final warning: EU has reached 'breaking point' in Ukraine

Published

on

Borrell's final warning: EU has reached 'breaking point' in Ukraine

In an interview before leaving office, Josep Borrell sounds the alarm about Russia’s military superiority in its war of aggression in Ukraine and urges EU countries to “do more and quicker” to support Ukraine. “We don’t have a sense of urgency.”

ADVERTISEMENT

As his five-year mandate as the European Union’s foreign policy chief comes to an end, Josep Borrell issues a final warning about the danger that Russia’s expansionism poses for the entire bloc and calls, one last time, on member states to ramp up their military assistance and prevent Ukraine from succumbing to Vladimir Putin’s control.

“We’ve reached the breaking point. Now it’s the moment when member states have to decide: we go and we support,” Borrell said in an interview with a group of media, including Euronews, two days before the end of his tenure.

“The Russians are pushing a lot. The Russians are not waiting for negotiations. Russia continues pushing slowly but continuously,” he went on. “The situation on the frontline is not good (but) the Ukrainians resist.”

Borrell’s comments come at a critical time in the war, with Russian troops making substantial territorial gains in the East and escalating their large-scale attacks against Ukraine’s energy system and civilian infrastructure. At the same time, an estimated 11,000 North Korean soldiers have joined the battle in the Kursk region, which Kyiv partially occupies and hopes to use as leverage in future talks.

“The Russian superiority continues. They have been provided by North Korea much more than we have been able to provide to the Ukrainians,” Borrell said as he directly challenged the belief that Moscow has become a pariah on the global stage.

Advertisement

“I have to recognise: is Russia politically isolated? Certainly not. How many people went to Kazan?” he asked, referring to the BRICS summit in October that saw Putin host the likes of China’s Xi Jinping, India’s Narendra Modi, South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphose and, controversially, the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, among other guests.

“I can’t frankly say that Russia is becoming isolated in the international community.”

The High Representative, one of Kyiv’s staunchest supporters in the bloc, spent a great deal of his time in office haggling with governments over sanctions to weaken the Kremlin’s war machine and military supplies to strengthen Ukraine’s army.

While his efforts ensured a continued flow of assistance, the overall picture has fallen short of expectations: the EU achieved this month its much-touted target of providing Ukraine with one million rounds of ammunition – originally pencilled for the end of March. Meanwhile, a €6.6 billion fund in collective assistance is still under Hungary’s firm veto.

“This pace is completely insufficient,” Borrell lamented. “We have to speed up and do more and quicker. Do more and quicker. We’ve got 1 million rounds. Okay, that’s good. But Russia is shooting 800,000 rounds of ammunition per month. Figures matter.”

Advertisement

‘No sense of urgency’

Having a brutal war raging at its doorstep has forced the EU to reinvent its defence policy, long ignored under the mirage of peaceful times. Defence spending has drastically increased until reaching €326 billion in 2024, an unprecedented 1.9% of the bloc’s GDP, according to the latest report of the Europea Defence Agency.

But there is a growing awareness that much more needs to be done to prepare for the post-war reality of an emboldened Russia. One of the ideas that has gained traction, and which was recently endorsed by Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland, is the issuance of joint debt, or Eurobonds, to boost the bloc’s defence industry.

Although not opposed in principle, Borrell believes this project is not adequate to respond to the invasion because it would only yield results sometime in the future.

“There is something that in Europe we miss very often, which is a time dimension of things,” Borrell said. “If you have to wait to issue debt to collect the money and develop the industrial capacity to produce, (then) it’s too late, my friend. It’s too late. If you have to substitute the military capability of the US, it’s not by issuing bonds, collecting the money, investing and producing. That’s for the next war. For this war, you have to mobilise what you have. Because time matters.”

When EU leaders decided in 2020 to establish a €750-billion recovery fund backed by joint debt, it took Brussels several months to obtain legal consent from the 27 capitals and have the plan up and running. By the time payments began, most countries were already out of COVID lockdowns and enjoying a healthy economic recovery.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

“If Russia breaks the front in the next spring, they will not wait for you to issue bonds,” Borrell said. “By the way, how long does it take to issue bonds? I don’t know, but past experience shows that it’s quite slow.”

The war in Ukraine is a “race against time,” he underlined, meaning the financial thinking that was applied to the pandemic cannot be copy-pasted as a solution now.

“Use what you have today, use the tools and the instruments that have been invented in the past to be used in the present,” Borrell said.

We spend too much time designing the strategies for the day after tomorrow when the problem is for today and (it’s) immediate. We don’t have a sense of urgency.”

ADVERTISEMENT

‘Don’t pretend it’s for free’

An external factor that might help the EU gain the sense of urgency that Borrell regrets is lacking is the upcoming return of Donald Trump to the White House.

The Republican has promised to heavily revise aid to Ukraine and strike a deal to end the war “in 24 hours,” without providing specific details. Should America, a world-class producer of high-tech weapons, withdraw from the West’s common front, Europe will be essentially left alone in supporting the war-torn nation.

“Are we able to supply arms to Ukraine in order to substitute the US engagement? No. Can you realistically say yes?” Borrell said during the interview.

Advertisement

“In three months or two months, things may change a lot in the front line and they (Ukrainians) are not sitting and waiting for Trump to come and decide something.”

ADVERTISEMENT

To avoid a last-minute scramble to fill America’s vacuum, Borrell urges member states to replenish their military stock, donate as much as possible now and lift all restrictions on the use of weapons so that Ukraine could strike targets deep into Russian territory. US President Joe Biden has already dropped his veto but German Chancellor Olaf Scholz remains categorically opposed to delivering long-range Taurus missiles.

“Now we have to restock because these stocks ended. No more stocks. So that’s the question. We survived and Ukraine survived thanks to the fact that the former Soviet Union countries have stocks of arms that the Ukrainians knew how to work,” Borrell said, referring to the first months of the war.

“Until the last minute of my mandate, I’m going to continue recommending member states what I have been saying for months: do more and quicker,” he added.

“If there’s a cut on the supply lines, these people cannot fight. And this is my concern. This has to arrive every day. If there are stockpiles, they have to be sent by train, by plane. They have to arrive. They have to be paid.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The chief diplomat, however, admitted backing Kyiv requires not just the endorsement of presidents and prime ministers but also the buy-in of ordinary citizens, who might be wondering why their taxes should be spent in a distant nation. Communication, he said, is fundamental to helping people understand the threat that Europe also faces.

“In order to continue supporting Ukraine as much as needed, which is much more than until now, members have to win the battle of internal politics because we live in democratic countries. And the governments need the support of the population in order to continue spending money for Ukraine,” he said.

Advertisement

“We have to have the support of the people, and we have to tell them the truth: it’s not for free. Our war cost money and cost lives. And thankfully, it’s not our lives, but it’s our money. Don’t pretend this to be for free,” he went on.

“Someone has to explain to the public opinion in the public debate what is at stake. And I think we are not doing enough. And we try to hide the cost. Don’t hide the cost. Be honest with the people. This has a cost.”

ADVERTISEMENT

World

US tells ASML it is concerned China may have top chip tool, Bloomberg News reports

Published

on

US tells ASML it is concerned China may have top chip tool, Bloomberg News reports
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick ​outlined concerns to ‌Dutch chip-equipment firm ASML’s senior leaders ​that one ​of its top-of-the-line machines ⁠may have ​made its way into ​China, in violation of U.S.-led export restrictions, ​Bloomberg News ​reported on Thursday.
Continue Reading

World

Iran hardliner behind US deal warns Tehran won’t honor agreement if Trump fails to deliver

Published

on

Iran hardliner behind US deal warns Tehran won’t honor agreement if Trump fails to deliver

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Iran’s hardline parliament speaker and key negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned that Tehran would not honor its commitments under a newly signed memorandum with the U.S. if Washington fails to uphold its side of the deal, according to the media arm of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. 

“If the United States does not honor its commitments, there is no way Iran will honor its own commitments,” Ghalibaf said.

Ghalibaf’s warning was echoed Thursday by Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani, who threatened the U.S. in remarks translated by MEMRI TV, saying, “Americans should know their place and avoid confronting the Muslims.” 

Qaani added that “Trump is trembling” and warned that the U.S. “should fear not only Hormuz and Bab al-Mandeb, but many other locations as well.”

Advertisement

MEET IRAN’S HARDLINE SPEAKER WHO THREATENED TO BURN US FORCES — REPORTEDLY TEHRAN’S POINT MAN FOR TALKS

The warnings came after President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian Wednesday digitally signed a copy of the memorandum aimed at ending the war and resuming the flow of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran’s hardline parliament speaker and key negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned that Tehran would not honor its commitments under a newly signed memorandum with the U.S. if Washington fails to uphold its side of the deal.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA)

The memorandum gives Iran major economic relief while leaving some of the most difficult nuclear questions for a final agreement to be negotiated throughout the next 60 days. Under the 14-point plan read by a senior U.S. official, Washington agreed to begin lifting its naval blockade, work with regional partners on a $300 billion reconstruction and development plan for Iran and terminate U.S., U.N. and other sanctions on an agreed schedule as part of a final deal. 

The memorandum also says all licenses, waivers and permissions needed for related financial transactions would be granted by the United States.

Advertisement

In return, Iran reaffirmed that it “shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons,” and the sides agreed to resolve the fate of Iran’s stockpiled enriched material under a future mechanism, with the minimum method being on-site down-blending under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision. 

The agreement defers many of the hardest questions — including how to wind down Iran’s nuclear program — until the 60-day negotiation period for a final deal.

But the Iranian figure at the center of the deal is not a diplomat known for moderation. 

Ghalibaf, a former Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps commander and longtime regime insider, has threatened American forces, vowed Trump would “pay the price” and built his career through loyalty to Iran’s security establishment.

The new warning underscored what experts say is the central risk of the agreement. Washington may be entering a deal with officials who can enforce Iran’s commitments but who have shown little sign of changing the regime’s long-term posture toward the U.S., Israel or the region. 

Advertisement

Ghalibaf, 64, is a product of Iran’s security establishment. He rose through the ranks of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps during the Iran-Iraq War, eventually becoming commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps air force. 

He later served as Iran’s national police chief, overseeing internal security forces responsible for suppressing protests, including the 1999 student uprising, alongside Qassem Soleimani.

After transitioning into politics, Ghalibaf attempted to run for president multiple times but failed. He instead built his career through loyalty to the system, serving as Tehran’s mayor for more than a decade before becoming speaker of parliament in 2020.

FAMILIES OF IRAN’S ELITE LIVE LAVISHLY ABROAD WHILE ORDINARY CITIZENS SUFFER AT HOME

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf looks on as parliament members wearing military uniforms chant in support of the IRGC in Tehran, Iran, on Feb. 1, 2026. (Hamed Malekpour/Islamic consultative assembly news agency/WANA/Handout via Reuters)

Advertisement

“Ghalibaf doesn’t have an independent line. His strength is that he is a ‘yes man,’” Beni Sabti, an Iran expert at the Institute for National Security Studies, previously told Fox News Digital. “If he is told to shake hands with special envoy Steve Witkoff, he will do it. If he is told to escalate, he will. It is not about moderation, it is about who gives the orders.”

“His name has also been linked to multiple corruption allegations, including misuse of oil revenues and sanctions evasion networks involving his family. His sons have reportedly been involved and are under sanctions,” Sabti said.

“There have also been public scandals involving family members traveling abroad and making luxury purchases, including widely circulated images of them arriving with numerous high-end Gucci suitcases.”

Behnam Ben Taleblu, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said the image of Ghalibaf at a signing ceremony with a senior U.S. official would be a propaganda victory for the regime.

“There was a time when the Islamic Republic would have been terrified to be seen signing such a thing,” Ben Taleblu told Fox News Digital. “Postwar, this is a sign of the regime’s opportunism, and no one identifies that opportunism better than someone like Ghalibaf, who comes from the IRGC, who is a corrupt politician and is a wheeler and dealer.”

Advertisement

But Taleblu warned that Washington should not confuse Ghalibaf’s opportunism with moderation. 

“The mirage is the myth of Iranian military moderation and the myth that, with time, this regime will integrate and put aside all the things that have kept it on the sidelines for so long,” he said. “Transforming Iran via a deal — that is a huge lift.”

Ghalibaf’s wartime statements reflect the hardline posture inside Iran’s leadership. In remarks aired on Iranian television Jan. 12 and translated by MEMRI, he warned that U.S. forces would face catastrophic consequences if they confronted Iran.

“Come, so you can see what catastrophe befalls American bases, ships and forces,” he said, adding that American troops would be “burned by the fire of Iran’s defenders.”

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION UNVEILS SWEEPING TERMS OF PROPOSED IRAN AGREEMENT

Advertisement

A man lights a cigarette with fire from a burning picture of Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf as Israelis rally in support of nationwide protests in Iran in Holon, Israel, on Jan. 14, 2026. (Ammar Awad/Reuters)

More recently, he warned that “the blood of American soldiers is the personal responsibility of Trump” and vowed Iran would “settle accounts with the Americans and Israelis,” adding that “Trump and Netanyahu crossed our red lines and will pay the price.”

John Hannah, a senior fellow at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America and a former national security advisor to Vice President Dick Cheney, said Ghalibaf’s expected role reflects the reality of who holds power inside Iran. 

“If you’re going to sign an agreement with Iran, those are the forces in charge and calling the shots, presumably with the approval of the new supreme leader,” Hannah told Fox News Digital. “If the U.S. harbors hope that Iran will ever implement any of their obligations under the MOU, these are the people — odious as they are — capable of making it happen.”

But Hannah said the central question is whether Iran’s leadership sees compliance as useful or whether the agreement is simply a tactical pause.

Advertisement

“The big question is whether they see it in their interest to do so, or are they only buying time, rebuilding their power and preparing for the next round of conflict,” he said.

Ben Taleblu was even more blunt, warning that even a seemingly favorable agreement would not change the nature of the regime.

“Even if you’ve got the perfect deal, with this kind of regime, with this kind of mentality, they will escalate,” he said. “I thought we would have learned by now what the regime did after the JCPOA. It built a vast missile arsenal. It literally built an empire of terror proxies that took Israel years of blood, effort and money to dismantle, backed by American support.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf speaks during a press conference in Tehran, Iran, Nov. 27, 2024. (Majid Asgaripour/WANA via Reuters)

Advertisement

“If we engage in pay-to-play with these guys,” he added, “I’m sorry to sound the alarm bell like this — but something tells me this is bad either way.”

Responding to questions about the threats from Ghalibaf and IRGC Quds Force commander Esmail Qaani, the White House defended Trump’s approach and warned Iran would face consequences if it failed to reach a final deal.

“President Trump has a great track record of good deals for the American people, and the President has been clear about the consequences if Iran fails to make a good, final deal,” White House spokeswoman Olivia Wales told Fox News Digital. 

“What the president has achieved on the battlefield and at the negotiating table is nothing short of remarkable and will strengthen American security for many years to come.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

US-Iran talks postponed as Israel attacks Lebanon

Published

on

US-Iran talks postponed as Israel attacks Lebanon

Tehran holds back from talks to cement ceasefire due to ongoing Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon.

Planned talks in Switzerland between the United States and Iran to discuss the technical terms of their ceasefire deal have been postponed.

The Swiss Foreign Ministry confirmed early on Friday that the talks, which were scheduled to take place in Burgenstock, would now not go ahead.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Reports suggest that Iran has delayed sending its delegation to discuss the technical issues linked to the ceasefire deal – digitally signed by the two countries on Wednesday – due to Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Lebanon.

Advertisement

Israeli strikes overnight and into Friday have reportedly killed at least 16 people in southern Lebanon, with Iran-linked Hezbollah reporting intense fighting.

Talks postponed

A ceremony followed by talks was expected to be held at the Burgenstock Resort in Stansstad, near Lucerne in central Switzerland.

It is owned by Katara Hospitality, part of Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, which helped mediate peace in the conflict.

On Friday, in a message to media outlet AFP, the Swiss foreign ministry said: “The planned talks between the US, Iran, Qatar and Pakistan have been postponed”.

“Switzerland remains ready to facilitate these talks. The relevant preparatory work at Burgenstock is continuing,” it added, without providing a new date for the talks.

Advertisement

The announcement followed a report from media outlet Al-Mayadeen that Iran was delaying sending its delegation to Switzerland over Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Lebanon.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday that Israel’s military will stay in a “security zone” of southern Lebanon as long as “Israel’s security needs require it.”

Israel and Hezbollah are not parties to the agreement, but Iran has insisted Israel must withdraw from the large swath of southern Lebanon it is occupying.

Logistics have never been ‘simple or predictable’

The US push to quickly begin high-stakes talks with Iran hit a snag just two days after the signing of a 14-point memorandum of understanding with the US that sets out a framework for talks during a 60-day negotiation period.

Vice President JD Vance had been prepared to make an overnight flight to meet with his Iranian counterparts at the mountainside resort in the tiny Swiss village of Obburgen.

Advertisement

His staff and a small pack of journalists had even gathered at Joint Base Andrews outside Washington in anticipation of the trip.

Meanwhile, dozens of White House officials, advance staffers and more media gathered in Switzerland to prepare for Vance’s anticipated arrival.

But then, abruptly on Thursday evening, the trip was called off.

The White House issued a statement explaining Vance – who has been tapped by President Donald Trump to lead the negotiations – and his delegation were prepared for talks, but they were unable to finalise plans and the vice president would remain in Washington.

“The logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable,” the statement noted.

Advertisement

Also on Thursday, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif cancelled his trip to Switzerland, his spokesperson told AFP.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending