Connect with us

Politics

Mexican government buses migrants to US border as illegal immigration becomes top election issue

Published

on

Mexican government buses migrants to US border as illegal immigration becomes top election issue

The Mexican government has started busing migrants to the U.S. border if they have appointments under a controversial use of a phone app implemented by the Biden administration that allows migrants to be paroled into the U.S. 

The Mexican National Institute of Migration posted the video of what it said was the first bus transporting “foreigners” from Tapachula in the south of the country near Guatemala, to Reynosa near the U.S. border. It said that migrants will attend their appointments scheduled via the CBP One app. It is part of an “Emerging Safe Mobility Corridor” launched by the Mexican government last month.

The CBP One app was expanded during the Biden administration to allow up to 1,450 migrants per day to schedule an appointment at a U.S. port of entry to be paroled into the U.S. if they meet certain conditions. The app also allows them to upload documents ahead of that appointment.

US TO SANCTION MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL JALISCO OVER FENTANYL TRAFFICKING

This video shows migrants being transported on a bus by the Mexican government. (INAMI)

Advertisement

The Biden administration has said that the app is a key part of its migration strategy, which involves increasing funding to the border while expanding “lawful” migration pathways. It has also used the app to allow up to 30,000 nationals from four countries to fly directly into the U.S. after being approved.

But Republicans have accused the administration of abusing humanitarian parole, which is supposed to be used on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit. They have said that the administration is waving in migrants quasi-legally, and have pointed to numbers suggesting that over 95% of migrants who schedule an appointment are allowed in.

‘MOST RUTHLESS’ MEXICAN CARTELS OPERATE IN ALL 50 STATES, BRING TURF WARS TO US: DEA

The Mexican government announced in a press release last month the plan to transport foreigners to the U.S. border as part of a “safe mobility corridor.” Mexico said it will issue a temporary 20-day visa for those with a confirmed CBP One appointment, and give them transportation as well as food.

Mexico video CBP One

This video shows migrants being spoken to by a Mexican official. (INAMI)

The app recently came under fire from a DHS Inspector General report, which found issues with vetting among other problems with the app.

Advertisement

“Although CBP uses biographic and biometric information submitted to CBP One to determine whether arriving noncitizens have derogatory records, it does not leverage the information to identify suspicious trends as part of its pre-arrival vetting procedures,” the report said.

Meanwhile, immigration has become a top election issue after a three-year crisis at the southern border that repeatedly smashed records. The Biden administration has called for the backing of a bipartisan Senate bill that would increase funding to the border. It has blamed the crisis on the failure of Congress to provide that funding.

DHS is also pointing to a sharp decrease in apprehensions since President Biden signed an order to allow authorities to temporarily suspend the entry of illegal immigrants across the border. Officials say that has led to a 50% decrease in apprehensions since that time. It also says it has removed more than 131,000 individuals to 144 countries, including 420 international deportation flights. Officials say they have also tripled the percentage of non-citizens processed through Expedited Removal to Mexico while in custody.

Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, have blamed the crisis on the policies of the administration and the rolling back of what they see as successful Trump-era policies. Trump has promised to shut down parole policies and launch a massive deportation operation if elected in November. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Politics

Where Voters Will Decide on Abortion in November

Published

on

Where Voters Will Decide on Abortion in November

States voting on abortion

Voters in a record 10 states will decide whether to enshrine abortion rights in their state constitutions this fall. In Nebraska, voters face two measures: one favoring abortion rights and another that would ban abortion after the first trimester.

Supporters of abortion rights hope to continue their winning streak in both blue and red states, after a successful run of measures since the overturn of Roe v. Wade. Opponents have been working to keep these measures off the ballot or make them hard to pass.

How the measures would amend state constitutions

Of the abortion rights measures, most would recreate the standard set by Roe, which protected abortion until “viability” — the point at which a fetus could survive outside the uterus, or around 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Advertisement

Abortion ballot measures in 2024

Right to abortion until fetal viability
Right to abortion and public funding
Right to abortion until fetal viability
Right to reproductive freedom
Advertisement
Right to abortion until fetal viability
Right to abortion until fetal viability
Right to abortion until fetal viability
Ban on abortion after the first trimester
Right to abortion until fetal viability
Equal rights including protection from pregnancy discrimination
Advertisement
Right to abortion in the first trimester

Notes: In Nebraska, a measure needs a simple majority to pass and the number of supportive votes must be at least 35 percent of all votes cast in the election. In Nevada, a winning measure would have to pass again in the next general election before it could be added to the state’s Constitution.

In Nebraska, where two abortion ballot measures take opposite stances, state officials have said that the measure with the most supportive votes would take effect.

The New York proposal does not explicitly mention abortion, but proponents say it would prevent abortion restrictions by stopping discrimination based on pregnancy outcomes or reproductive health choices.

Advertisement

How the measures could change the legal landscape

Twenty-two states currently ban or restrict abortion, and the procedure is broadly legal in the rest of the country.

If every abortion rights measure is successful this fall, five states would see big changes in abortion access in the months after Election Day. Arizona, Florida, Missouri, Nebraska and South Dakota have existing bans and restrictions, and the ballot measures would make abortion broadly legal again.

Where ballot measures would lift abortion bans

South Dakota’s amendment would prevent abortion restrictions only in the first trimester, and the State Legislature is likely to pass new restrictions after that point.

Advertisement

In Colorado, Maryland, Montana and New York, abortion is already legal and winning measures would enshrine its status. Colorado’s measure would further expand abortion access by allowing the use of public funds to pay for the procedure.

If all of the measures fail, abortion laws in each state would be unchanged — at least for now. Legislatures in states like Arizona, Florida and Nebraska could restrict abortions further than they already do.

If the anti-abortion measure in Nebraska passes, it would enshrine restrictions after the first trimester, which is similar to the state’s current law.

What the polls say

A majority of U.S. adults say that abortion should be legal in all or most cases, according to recent national polling from the Pew Research Center. State-level polling of abortion attitudes is rarer, but a 2023 survey from the Public Religion Research Institute showed majority support for abortion rights in every state where the issue will be on the ballot this fall, except for South Dakota.

Advertisement

Polls that ask specifically about this year’s abortion rights ballot measures show broad support for the proposals, but experts say such polls should be interpreted with caution. Ballot measure language can be complex and confusing for the public and therefore difficult to poll. In addition, many of these polls are run by partisan groups that may have an agenda.

Still, polls from varied organizations reveal that a majority of people would support the abortion rights measures on the ballot in Arizona, Missouri, New York and South Dakota. But in Florida, where the abortion ballot measure must reach 60 percent support to pass, some polls have shown it falling short of that threshold.

Where voters have already backed abortion rights

Voters in seven states, including Republican-led Kentucky and Ohio, have sided with abortion rights supporters when voting on ballot measures since Roe was overturned in 2022.

Abortion ballot measures since 2022

Advertisement

Ohio Nov. 7, 2023

Right to reproductive freedom

Vermont Nov. 8, 2022

Right to reproductive freedom

Advertisement

California Nov. 8, 2022

Right to reproductive freedom

Michigan Nov. 8, 2022

Advertisement

Right to reproductive freedom

Montana Nov. 8, 2022

Medical care requirements for “infants born alive”

Advertisement

Kentucky Nov. 8, 2022

Remove abortion rights protections

Kansas Aug. 2, 2022

Remove abortion rights protections

Advertisement

The winning measures cemented abortion rights in California, Michigan and Vermont, and tossed out restrictions on the procedure in Ohio. Voters in Kansas, Kentucky and Montana rejected efforts to restrict abortion.

Continue Reading

Politics

Fani Willis likely to defy Georgia state Senate subpoena ahead of hearing Friday, chairman says

Published

on

Fani Willis likely to defy Georgia state Senate subpoena ahead of hearing Friday, chairman says

Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

District Attorney Fani Willis is expected to defy a Georgia state senate subpoena for her testimony ahead of a hearing Friday, Fox News Digital has learned.

The Senate Special Committee on Investigations, chaired by Republican state Sen. Bill Cowsert, subpoenaed Willis to compel her testimony related to the committee’s investigation into allegations she misused taxpayer funds. 

Advertisement

In an interview with Fox News Digital, Cowsert said after Willis refused to testify voluntarily, the committee issued a subpoena, adding her legal counsel had indicated to the committee she would not be complying with the subpoena. 

“We think it’s unlikely that she will appear but disappointing that she considers herself above the law,” Cowert said. 

FANI WILLIS FACES NOTHING BUT SETBACKS IN CASE AGAINST TRUMP, THE LATEST PENDING WITH SUPREME COURT

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis arrives to speak after winning the Democratic primary May 21, 2024, in Buckhead, Ga.  (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

If Willis does not appear at Friday’s hearing, the state Senate will seek to compel her attendance through a judicial order that will work its way through the court system the next few weeks. 

Advertisement

“We do have the authority to investigate and to issue subpoenas to compel testimony and the production of documents, and if tested in court, that will be validated,” Cowsert said. 

“She’ll be required to attend, and she’ll be required to produce certain requested documents. It may require a court order for her to obey them, but that’s where we’re headed.” 

FORMER SENATOR LAUNCHES 6-FIGURE AD BLITZ AGAINST FANI WILLIS AHEAD OF GEORGIA ELECTION

Fani Willis in court

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis during a hearing in the case of the State of Georgia v. Donald John Trump at the Fulton County Courthouse March 1, 2024, in Atlanta.  (Alex Slitz-Pool/Getty Images)

Friday’s hearing will feature a presentation from David Cook, the former Georgia secretary of the Senate, on the investigative powers of legislative bodies and the ability to subpoena. 

Legislative counsel Stuart Morelli will also testify on the committee’s legal authority to conduct investigations and to subpoena individuals to testify or to produce documents. 

Advertisement

The Republican-led committee was established in January by a resolution that passed by a 30-19 vote.

Willis, who is spearheading the sweeping prosection case against former President Trump, has come under scrutiny after she was accused in February of having an “improper” affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she had hired to help prosecute the case.

FANI WILLIS’ EX-STAFFER TESTIFIES SHE WAS FIRED AFTER BLOWING WHISTLE ON DA’S SPENDING

Fani Willis celebrates

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis celebrates after winning the Democratic primary May 21, 2024, in Buckhead, Ga.  (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)

A decision by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee not to disqualify her from the case is now on appeal, and that hearing is slated for December. 

The Georgia Senate committee has already held several hearings, including one featuring the testimony of a whistleblower who said she was fired after she raised concerns about Willis’ office’s alleged misuse of funds. 

Advertisement

Willis said in May she believes the committee has no authority to subpoena her and told a news reporter she “will not appear to anything that is unlawful.”

“I have not broken the law in any way,” Willis told reporters at a press conference in May. “I’m sorry folks get p—ed off that everyone gets treated equally.”

But Cowsert said the committee members are “all extremely confident that we’re acting within the constitutional and legislative authority of the state Senate.”

A representative for Willis did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment. 

Advertisement

The hearing begins Friday at 10 a.m. ET.

Continue Reading

Politics

New Hampshire Tightens Requirements for Voters

Published

on

New Hampshire Tightens Requirements for Voters

Gov. Chris Sununu of New Hampshire signed a bill on Thursday that creates a strict photo identification requirement to vote, allowing for no exceptions. The bill would also require first-time voters to present proof of citizenship when registering to vote.

The law does not take effect for 60 days, meaning it will have no impact on the upcoming elections.

Current law allows voters in New Hampshire who show up at the polls without proper identification to cast a ballot with an affidavit, and gives them seven days to return with proper identification. That law will still be in place in November.

Going forward, there will be no exceptions to the photo identification rules, and first-time voters will need to present a birth certificate, passport or other official citizenship document to register.

Initially, both Mr. Sununu and David M. Scanlan, the New Hampshire secretary of state, expressed reservations about the legislation. Mr. Sununu had said that he was “not looking into making significant changes in voting laws.” Mr. Scanlan had noted that implementing the law in time for the 2024 election “could be done, but not without challenges.”

Advertisement

A statement from the governor’s office on Thursday indicated that the secretary of state had been consulted and added a “reminder” that the “2024 election will not be impacted in any way.”

“We have a proud tradition and proven track record of conducting elections that are trusted and true,” Mr. Sununu, a Republican, said in a statement. “Looking forward to the next decade or two, this legislation will instill even more integrity and trust in the voting process.”

But critics argued that the law makes New Hampshire the only state in the country to require such specific proof of citizenship to register to vote. In 2018, a similar law in Kansas was struck down by a federal judge.

“This extreme legislation signed by the governor will roll back voting access for all eligible Granite Staters,” said McKenzie Taylor, director for the New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights, in a statement. “Once this law goes into effect later this year, any voter may be turned away from the polls if they did not have the correct documents, creating massive new changes to New Hampshire’s registration system, burdening our election officials, and disenfranchising eligible voters.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending