Connect with us

World

Netherlands to ask opt-out from EU asylum rules 'as soon as possible'

Published

on

Netherlands to ask opt-out from EU asylum rules 'as soon as possible'

The four-party cabinet in the Netherlands has vowed to establish “the strictest asylum regime ever” to curb irregular migration.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Dutch government of Prime Minister Dick Schoof has confirmed its intention to ask “as soon as possible” for an opt-out clause from the European Union’s migration and asylum rules, an unprecedented move from a founding member state.

The plan, previewed in July after Schoof took office, is considered far-fetched and symbolic, with little to no chance of succeeding as it would require re-tweaking highly sensitive legislation and could open the floodgates for similar demands.

It is unlikely that other capitals would be willing to accommodate The Hague’s wish: excluding the Netherlands from the bloc’s migration system would inevitably cause a wave of asylum seekers towards neighbouring countries, creating a crisis scenario.

However, the request represents a new brazen attempt by an EU country to challenge established laws in a desperate quest to curb irregular migration. It comes on the heels of Germany’s decision to re-establish border controls on all of its nine land borders, casting doubt over the functioning of the passport-free Schengen Area.

“The government will announce in Brussels as soon as possible that the Netherlands wants an opt-out of European asylum and migration regulations,” reads the government programme unveiled on Friday afternoon.

Advertisement

“As long as” this opt-out clause is not granted, the programme adds, the country will focus on implementing the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, the all-encompassing reform the EU completed in May after almost four years of hard-fought negotiations.

The Pact’s main novelty is a system of “mandatory solidarity” that will give countries three options to manage asylum seekers: relocate a certain number of them, pay €20,000 for each one they reject, or finance operational support. The Netherlands will choose financial support rather than reception, the programme confirms.

In anticipation of the Dutch announcement, the European Commission made it clear that all member states are bound by existing rules and that any exemption to their compliance should be negotiated before – not after – they are approved.

“We have adopted legislation. It’s adopted. You don’t opt out of adopted legislation in the EU,” a spokesperson said earlier in the day on Friday. “That’s a general principle.”

In May, the Netherlands voted in favour of all the laws that make up the New Pact.

Advertisement

The overhaul will take two years to enter into force. Member states have to submit implementation plans before the end of the year, detailing the administrative, operational and legal steps they intend to take to make the laws a reality.

‘Strictest regime ever’

The programme presented on Friday was agreed upon by the four parties that make up the ruling coalition in the Netherlands: the far-right, nationalist PVV; the conservative-liberal VVD; the populist, pro-farmers BBB; and the upstart, centre-right NSC.

Schoof, a technocrat, does not belong to any of them and was surprisingly picked as a consensus figure to captain the new political era.

The opt-out proposal is included in a wider chapter devoted to migration that features an extensive raft of measures meant to build up the “strictest asylum regime ever,” one of the key promises underpinning the cabinet.

The government argues the Netherlands can no longer cope with the “large influx” of asylum seekers asking for international protection, many of whom enter the EU through another member state and then travel across borders until arriving in Dutch territory.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT

About 48,500 asylum seekers and family members entered the country in 2023. Syrian, Turkish, Yemeni, Somali and Eritrean were among the most common nationalities.

According to the programme, the government will introduce emergency legislation with broad powers to freeze asylum applications and deport people without residence permits, “including by force.” Asylum seekers will be asked to return to their country of origin as soon as it is considered “safe,” a concept contested by NGOs.

The Netherlands also plans to work with “like-minded and surrounding countries” to manage a sudden influx of irregular migrants and build a “mini Schengen” area to intensify security surveillance.

World

Jodie Foster Says Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro ‘Couldn’t Stop Giggling’ While Teaching Her How to Unzip a Fly on ‘Taxi Driver’ Set: ‘They Were Just So Nervous’

Published

on

Jodie Foster Says Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro ‘Couldn’t Stop Giggling’ While Teaching Her How to Unzip a Fly on ‘Taxi Driver’ Set: ‘They Were Just So Nervous’

Jodie Foster reminisced about her time playing 12-year-old prostitute Iris in “Taxi Driver” alongside Martin Scorsese, Robert De Niro and Paul Schrader during the film’s 50th anniversary reunion at the Tribeca Festival. One memory that remains “seared in [her] memory” is arriving on set and finding Scorsese and De Niro unable to stop giggling as they tried to explain how to unzip De Niro’s pants for a provocative scene.

“Marty was trying to explain to me how I was supposed to pull down [De Niro’s] fly. They couldn’t stop giggling, and Bob’s like, ‘I’m gonna tell her.’ He would try to tell me what to do, and then he would start giggling,” Foster recalled Friday night at the OKX Theater in lower Manhattan. “They couldn’t give me a note because they were just so nervous that I was so young.”

As the laughter continued, Foster took matters into her own hands. “And I was like, ‘Well, you just want me to- okay, fine! First I pull down the fly, then I do this and I walk over there. What’s the big deal?’”

Half a century later, Foster’s confidence and command of a room remain intact. One of the night’s biggest laughs came when she politely (and directly) called out Schrader for beginning to answer a question without using his microphone. “He might be sitting on it!” Scorsese quipped. (Sure enough, he was).

This self-assurance is what impressed Scorsese the moment they met in his office before production began on the 1974 comedy “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore.” Foster was just 11 years old and still wearing her school uniform, but she made it clear that she already had eight years of acting experience under her belt.

Advertisement

“You just sat down [and said], ‘Yeah, I can do that. Okay, I got it. No problem,’” Scorsese recalled, mimicking her matter-of-fact attitude. “‘What are you doing next?’” he asked, to which she said, ‘Oh, I’m doing this other thing over at Disney.’” Foster giggled beside him, scrunching her shoulders and squirming in her seat as if she transported back to Scorsese’s set all those years ago. “She had an authority — I’m not kidding — an authority,” Scorsese concluded. “She was really quite supportive, if you could put it that way, because it was a hard shoot.”

During her January cover story interview with Variety, Foster said she’s always found working with male directors “kind of simple.” Her philosophy, as she put it: “You tell me what you want; I do it.” Her passion for cinema began with trips to the theater alongside her mother, where she was introduced to European, French New Wave and Japanese cinema. Yet it was De Niro’s slow-motion saunter into Tony’s bar in “Mean Streets” (set to the beat of Rolling Stones’ “Jumpin’ Jack Flash”) that crystallized her ambitions.

“The truth is, I saw ‘Mean Streets’ when I was a kid … and that was it,” Foster said, smiling toward De Niro. “I just wanted to be a part of this. Anything that you would have offered me, I would have done.” She then sprang from her seat and turned toward Scorsese. “In fact, I think I tried to be an extra in ‘New York, New York,’ but it didn’t work out because I was under 16 and they wouldn’t let me work at night.”

And then, moderator W. Kamau Bell said, “you did ‘Taxi Driver.’”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Jeff Bartos says UN reform is no longer an ‘oxymoron’ after $570M in cuts

Published

on

Jeff Bartos says UN reform is no longer an ‘oxymoron’ after 0M in cuts

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

UNITED NATIONS — When Jeff Bartos appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 2025 for his confirmation hearing, he was warned that the job he was seeking might not exist. 

The Pennsylvania businessman, former political candidate and endurance athlete had been nominated by President Donald Trump to serve as U.S. ambassador for United Nations Management and Reform — a title that has long sounded aspirational in a building famous for bureaucracy.

During his confirmation hearing, Bartos recalled being greeted with a dose of skepticism.

“UN reform? That’s an oxymoron if I’ve ever heard one,” lawmakers told him.

Advertisement

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION COULD LEAD TO BUDGET CUTS, LEADERSHIP SHAKEUP AT UN

When Jeff Bartos appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 2025 for his confirmation hearing, he was warned that the job he was seeking might not exist.  (Eduardo Munoz/Reuters)

Less than a year later, Bartos believes the impossible is beginning to happen.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, the Trump administration official laid out an ambitious campaign to reshape an institution critics say has become bloated, inefficient and increasingly disconnected from its founding mission.

The effort comes at a pivotal moment for the United Nations. The stakes extend well beyond budgets. As the U.N. confronts a cash crunch, prepares to choose its next secretary-general and faces growing scrutiny from the administration, the debate over reform has become a battle over the institution’s future: whether it remains on its current course or undergoes its most significant restructuring in decades.

Advertisement

UN FACES SEVERE CASH CRISIS AS TRUMP ADMIN RAMPS UP PRESSURE ON WORLD BODY

U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz speaks during a United Nations Security Council meeting at U.N. headquarters in New York City on Feb. 28, 2026, following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. (Heather Khalifa/Reuters)

Secretary-General António Guterres has repeatedly warned of a growing liquidity crisis as the organization struggles with delayed member-state payments, including billions owed by the United States. At the same time, the Trump administration has made clear that future funding and support will be increasingly tied to reforms.

Bartos argues that pressure is already producing results.

Sitting at the U.N. headquarters, he points to what he calls historic achievements: roughly $570 million cut from the U.N.’s regular budget and 2,900 positions eliminated through negotiations among all 193 member states.

Advertisement

“Again, never happened before in 80 years,” Bartos said.

“$570 million cut to the regular budget, approximately 3,000 posts cut. Unanimity. That’s by consensus. All 193 countries had to come together.”

For Bartos, the achievement is particularly striking because many diplomats viewed meaningful reform as impossible.

AMBASSADOR MIKE WALTZ LAYS OUT ‘AMERICA FIRST’ VISION FOR US LEADERSHIP AT THE UN

As the U.N. confronts a cash crunch, prepares to choose its next secretary-general and faces growing scrutiny from the administration, the debate over reform has become a battle over the institution’s future.  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Advertisement

“I promised you we wouldn’t let you down,” he recalled telling Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jim Risch months after his confirmation.

The reforms represent only what Bartos describes as a “down payment.” The next phase is already underway.

As member states negotiate peacekeeping budgets for the coming year, the administration is pushing to reduce spending, streamline missions and eliminate programs it believes no longer serve their intended purpose.

One example, Bartos said, involves changing how the U.N. reimburses countries that contribute equipment to peacekeeping missions.

Previously, reimbursement was largely based on whether equipment was present.

Advertisement

“The methodology that the U.N. used to reimburse troop-contributing countries for equipment was: ‘Is it there?’” Bartos said.

The United States pushed for a simple change: “You get reimbursed when the equipment is put into action to do work.”

The reform could save roughly $30 million annually, according to U.S. estimates.

For Bartos, however, the dollar figure matters less than what it represents.

“It’s a culture change,” he said. “Being efficient, being respectful of every dollar, thinking about the taxpayers who fund all this.”

Advertisement

That mindset is driving the administration’s next major targets: employee compensation and pensions.

Bartos argues that the U.N.’s pension system and benefits structure consume resources that could otherwise be directed toward humanitarian operations.

Not everyone at the United Nations agrees with Bartos’ assessment. U.N. officials argue that many of the reforms predate the Trump administration and were already being pursued under Secretary-General António Guterres.

“From day one, the Secretary-General has been committed to reforms,” U.N. spokesman Stéphane Dujarric told Fox News Digital and added, “A few days ago, on 28 May, the Secretary-General told Member States that they need to act on structural reform, saying, “Genuine reform requires tough choices. This is no time for complacency, self-interest, or foot-dragging.”

FORMER HIGH-LEVEL UNITED NATIONS OFFICIALS TO LAUNCH ‘DOGE-UN’ TO HIGHLIGHT AGENCY INEFFICIENCIES

Advertisement

A view of the United Nations Headquarters building in New York City, United States on July 16, 2024. (Jakub Porzycki/NurPhoto via Getty Images)

The UN80 initiative is Guterres’ flagship reform effort, aimed at cutting duplication, reviewing mandates and making the UN system more efficient.

Still, Bartos argues the pace and scope of reform changed dramatically once the United States began applying pressure through budget negotiations and funding discussions.

“The U.N. is at a decision point,” Bartos told Fox News Digital.

The debate comes as the organization faces mounting financial pressure. Dujarric said Guterres remains deeply concerned about ongoing liquidity challenges caused by delayed payments from member states, including the United States.

Advertisement

“Unlike a government, the U.N. cannot borrow or print money,” Dujarric said, warning that the organization is expected to execute programs with funds it has not received while also returning unused funds at the end of the year.

Earlier in 2026, Guterres urged member states either to pay their assessed contributions in full and on time or overhaul the U.N.’s financial rules to prevent what he described as the risk of financial collapse.

The reforms are unfolding as the U.N. begins preparing for one of the most consequential transitions in years: the search for a successor to Guterres, whose term expires at the end of 2026.

According to Bartos, reform has become a central topic in discussions with prospective candidates.

The administration hopes the next secretary-general will embrace efforts to reduce bureaucracy and return the institution to what Bartos repeatedly describes as a “back-to-basics” approach.

Advertisement

The challenge, he acknowledges, is enormous.

Yet Bartos insists the experience has prepared him in unexpected ways.

Before entering government, he completed two Ironman triathlons while balancing work and family life.

“It’s discipline, planning, prioritization,” he said. “It’s not dissimilar to budget negotiations.”

The comparison may sound unusual, but it reflects how Bartos views the job: not as a sprint, but as an endurance race requiring patience, persistence and long-term thinking.

Advertisement

The mission also carries a personal dimension.

TRUMP REMOVES US FROM UN HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, BANS UNRWA FUNDING

Bartos argues that the UN’s pension system and benefits structure consume resources that could otherwise be directed toward humanitarian operations. (Heather Khalifa/AP Photo)

After two unsuccessful statewide campaigns in Pennsylvania — first as the Republican nominee for lieutenant governor in 2018 and later as a candidate in the state’s 2022 Republican Senate primary — Bartos said he had largely stepped away from politics before returning to public service following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. 

Bartos recalled his wife urging him to get involved: “You’ve spent your life working on these issues. You need to do something.”

Advertisement

He ultimately joined efforts to help elect Trump and later accepted the U.N. role.

Now, after tackling what many considered the first impossible mission — reforming the United Nations — Bartos is preparing for what may prove an even harder challenge.

Bartos said he was recently tasked by U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Mike Waltz with helping lead efforts to combat what the administration views as entrenched anti-Israel bias across the U.N. system, including agencies, special rapporteurs and investigative bodies.

The debate intensified following the publication of the U.N. secretary-general’s annual report on conflict-related sexual violence, which added Israeli security forces to the report’s blacklist of parties credibly suspected of patterns of sexual violence in armed conflict. Israel rejected the allegations and announced it would suspend engagement with Secretary-General António Guterres’ office.

ISRAEL ACCUSES UN OF PLACING IT ON SAME SEXUAL VIOLENCE BLACKLIST AS HAMAS TERRORISTS, SEVERS TIES

Advertisement

President Donald Trump addresses the 74th United Nations General Assembly at the United Nations Headquarters Sept. 24, 2019, during his first term. (AAnthony Behar/Sipa USA)

Responding to the report, Waltz told Fox News Digital that the UN has failed to address what he described as a longstanding pattern of institutional antisemitism.

“The U.N. was built in the wake of World War II and the Holocaust, and yet, remarkably, it continues to be weaponized against the Jewish people and Israel,” Waltz said. “Whether it’s a U.N. official regularly referencing Israel as a ‘stain on humanity’ and attacking American companies for doing business with Israel, or reports that spread misinformation and propaganda, this antisemitism is completely unacceptable.”

“It’s been over a year since the secretary general signed off on an ‘action plan’ to fight antisemitism at the institution — it would be nice if the institution actually used it,” he added.

Bartos argues that anti-Israel bias has become embedded across multiple U.N. bodies and says the administration is working to dismantle what he calls that infrastructure through diplomacy, funding decisions and engagement with the next generation of U.N. leadership.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the 80th United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York City on Sept. 26, 2025, with many seats empty. (Caitlin Ochs/Reuters)

“There is not a day that goes by that we’re not working on that,” Bartos said.

The United Nations rejects accusations that it has ignored antisemitism within its ranks.

Dujarric told Fox News Digital that the secretary-general launched a formal Action Plan to Combat Antisemitism in January 2025 aimed at tracking antisemitism within U.N. structures and evaluating whether the organization’s policies and actions are effectively addressing the problem.

Advertisement

Dujarric also disputed suggestions that Guterres directly controls some of the U.N. bodies most frequently criticized by Israel and its supporters. 

“The U.N. mechanisms that you allude to, including human rights mechanisms, are created by and accountable to Member States,” Dujarric said. “The Secretary-General has no authority over them.”

“It is very important for Member States to actively engage in these mechanisms if they have concerns about their content and tone,” he added.

“The U.N. is at a decision point,” Bartos concluded. 

Whether the institution changes enough to satisfy its largest financial contributor remains one of the most consequential questions facing the organization — and the man charged with answering it insists the work is only beginning.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Groom killed hours before his wedding in Gaza

Published

on

Groom killed hours before his wedding in Gaza

Muhannad Farwana never got to wear his wedding suit, Israel killed him in an air strike on his family home in Khan Younis hours before his wedding. His family says a day meant for celebrating the 26-year-old has turned into mourning him as Israel keeps attacking Gaza despite a so-called ‘ceasefire’.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending