Connect with us

Vermont

State Budgets Are So Flush, Even Vermont & California Progressives Are Cutting Taxes

Published

on

State Budgets Are So Flush, Even Vermont & California Progressives Are Cutting Taxes


It’s not usually the Vermont statehouse, a legislative physique run by progressive Democrats, passes a tax invoice seen as a mannequin to be adopted by lawmakers in different states, each pink and blue. But that’s the case after the Vermont Legislature’s Could 12 passage of Home Invoice 730, laws chopping the state excise tax price for spirits-based canned cocktails, sometimes called ready-to-drink (RTD) drinks.

HB 730, which is now on Governor Phil Scott’s (R) desk awaiting his consideration, would finish a tax disparity within the grownup beverage market that is a matter in most states and on the federal degree. Presently the federal authorities and most state governments assess the next excise tax price on spirits-based RTD drinks than on competing drinks like grownup seltzers. Regardless of having an alcohol content material just like spirits-based RTD drinks, grownup seltzers like Really and White Claw are assessed a a lot decrease excise tax price just because they’re made with fermented sugar.

Advertisement

HB 730 reduces the state excise tax on spirits-based RTD merchandise from $7.68/gallon to $1.10/gallon, which can present aid to Vermonters amid the best inflation in 4 a long time. HB 730 would additionally enhance client comfort, increasing entry to spirits-based RTD merchandise by permitting 1,030 personal beer and wine retailers to promote them, one thing that’s at the moment prohibited by state regulation.

If Governor Scott indicators HB 730 into regulation, many Vermonters would see tax financial savings on their Fourth of July festivities. That’s as a result of HB 730, if enacted, takes impact on July 1, 2022, the primary day of the brand new fiscal 12 months.

“Not solely are Vermont spirits shoppers inconvenienced by having to go to a separate retailer to buy spirits-based ready-to-drink cocktails, however in addition they incur greater costs because of the extreme tax burden positioned on these merchandise,” stated Jay Hibbard, Distilled Spirits Council of america Senior Vice President of State Authorities Relations. “There isn’t a cause merchandise with the identical or related alcohol content material must be taxed at such wildly various charges. Making a extra equal tax price for spirits-based RTDs will assist Vermont’s distillers, decrease prices for shoppers and usher in income for the state. We thank the Legislature for shifting this measure ahead and encourage Governor Scott to signal the invoice.”

The introduction and passage of comparable payments in different states, with assist from each Democrats and Republicans, demonstrates the bipartisan enchantment of the tax aid and equalization present in HB 730. After the enactment of laws in 2021 to scale back the excise tax price on RTD merchandise in Nebraska and Michigan, a dozen states have thought of such laws in 2022. Arizona is poised to be the following state the place lawmakers reduce taxes on RTD drinks so that they’re taxed at the same price as competing merchandise with roughly the identical alcohol content material. Home Invoice 2627, which might accomplish this aim, is now pending within the Arizona Home of Representatives, which is predicted to adjourn within the subsequent few weeks.

Advertisement

“These two issues proper subsequent to one another are primarily the identical factor however one is charged 16 cents a gallon and the opposite is charged $3 a gallon,” stated Arizona Consultant Jeff Weninger (R) of the disparity in alcohol excise taxation that he and his colleagues are attempting to rectify with HB 2627.

Not everyone seems to be on board with the aim of accelerating fairness in alcohol excise taxation by lowering the tax price on spirits-based RTD merchandise. The primary opposition to such proposals comes from the makers of onerous seltzers that take pleasure in a tax benefit just because they’re made with fermented sugars, regardless of having related alcohol content material as spirits-based RTD drinks.

Tax Reduction Is A Extra Bipartisan Affair In 2022

Vermont isn’t the one state the place Democrats have handed tax cuts this 12 months. In Kansas, for instance, Governor Laura Kelly (R) just lately signed laws phasing out the gross sales tax on groceries over a number of years. The gross sales tax utilized to groceries in Kansas will drop from 6.5% to 4% in 2023, fall once more to 2% in 2024, after which go to zero in 2025.

In the meantime Kelly’s Democratic counterpart in Colorado, Governor Jared Polis, just lately signed into regulation a property tax aid package deal that may save Colorado households and employers $700 million over the following two years.

“Each Colorado home-owner could have their property tax price go down,” Governor Polis stated of the reform package deal he signed on Could 16. “Along with that, there may be an excellent larger property tax reduce for business properties as a result of business properties in Colorado wind up paying, considerably unfairly, a a lot greater price. That’s due to a method that Colorado used to make use of that voters lastly revoked, however its legacy continues to be there.”

Advertisement

The property tax aid invoice enacted by Governor Polis was authorized by a Democrat-led legislature, however handed with bipartisan assist.

“The worst sort of taxes are property taxes the place you might be actually paying the federal government lease on one thing you got that they didn’t enable you to pay for,” stated Colorado Consultant Patrick Neville (R). “So that is the worst sort of taxes and something we are able to do to supply aid for these taxes, I’m on board.”

Even in California — house to the nation’s highest state revenue tax price, the best state gross sales tax price, and among the many highest general tax burdens within the U.S. — main Democrats are proposing tax aid. Governor Gavin Newsom (D), who signed a multi-billion greenback tax hike on employers within the center the pandemic, is now proposing a tax reduce.

In his revised 2022-23 finances plan launched on Could 13, Governor Newsom proposed a complete elimination of the cultivation tax California assesses on hashish. This proposal has gained plaudits from throughout the ideological spectrum.

“This specific tax is exclusive amongst agricultural merchandise in California, and because of the laws handed in 2017 to ascertain tax authorities, it is frequently adjusted for inflation,” writes Purpose Journal’s Scott Shackford. “In consequence, cultivation tax charges really elevated initially of 2022 regardless of this huge black market drawback.”

Advertisement

Other than these blue state tax cuts, Democrats additionally supported vital revenue tax cuts handed in pink states this 12 months. Each Democrat within the South Carolina Home and Senate voted for revenue tax chopping laws this spring. Most Democrats within the Georgia legislature, in the meantime, voted for a invoice signed by Governor Brian Kemp (R) in April that may scale back and flatten Georgia’s private revenue tax. In Mississippi, each Democrat within the Home voted to utterly part out the state revenue tax.

14 states enacted revenue tax aid in 2021. Many extra have adopted go well with this 12 months and there may be nonetheless time left for extra tax cuts to cross in 2022. Colorado residents, for instance, could get an opportunity to enrich the aforementioned property tax aid with a state revenue tax reduce that may seem on the November poll. The developments in state capitals in 2022, even progressive dominated ones like Montpelier and Sacramento, present extra assist for the assertion that we’re in a golden age for state tax aid, a phenomenon that has just lately develop into a extra bipartisan affair.



Source link

Vermont

Senior leaders power Milton girls soccer to second consecutive D-II championship

Published

on

Senior leaders power Milton girls soccer to second consecutive D-II championship


Holley MacLellan, already one of Vermont’s best players and a state champion, refused to settle on her past success.

Hannah Smiley, who missed the entire 2023 season due to an ACL injury, returned to the pitch, ready to prove her worth.

One Milton star refined her game, the other regained her swagger. And the Yellowjackets program reaped the benefits during another title run.

Advertisement

Behind MacLellan’s long-distance strikes and Smiley serving as an instrumental figure on the defense’s 11th shutout this fall, top-seeded Milton dispatched No. 7 Mount Abraham 2-0 to retain the Division II high school girls soccer championship at Burlington’s Buck Hard Field on Friday night.

With the win, Milton (17-1) now owns 18 crowns out of 21 championship-game appearances.

“Last year was a hard season to beat. I’ve been a part of four (titles) and I’m happy to say that,” said second-year coach Cait Fogel, a program alum and former Yellowjacket star. “I told them, ‘You are not just the state champs this year, Milton is the CVU of Division II.’ Nobody can argue that.”

And senior co-captains MacLellan and Smiley were at the center of Milton’s 18th banner. A technically gifted and strong-willed midfielder, MacLellan trusted her shot from deep, resulting in a career-high 27 tallies and leading an offense that fired in 90 team goals in 2024. Friday’s efforts arrived in the 15th minute via Savannah Monahan’s directed loose ball and then with 17:36 to play on Cianna Tomasi’s simple, but effective square pass to put away a gritty Mount Abraham side.

Advertisement

“It’s hard to speak about such a talented player and say she’s grown, but she has grown, surprisingly,” Fogel said of MacLellan. “She’s seen what’s working and what’s not. The 40-yard shots that weren’t going in and she finally adjusted and let them rip with a purpose. It obviously paid off and couldn’t have asked for a better night to finally dial it in.”

Smiley solidified Milton’s back line with Marlie Bushey, Taylor Shappy and Avery Turner. Smiley’s return allowed Fogel to put Lila Martin back in net. The group conceded just 12 times in their 18 games.

In Friday’s final, Martin turned back five shots to finish with 73 saves this fall.

Advertisement

“Just having (Smiley) there was the final piece of the puzzle that we were missing a little bit from last year,” Fogel said. “Just that sense of peace to have (Smiley) on the back line right next to (Bushey). It was just indescribable.”

Said MacLellan of Smiley and Bushey: “They were fantastic. They were perfect, a crazy duo back there.”

MacLellan’s opening salvo gave Milton control against Mount Abraham in the teams’ third meeting this season (Milton won the first matchups, 1-0 in overtime in Bristol and then 4-0 at home). Monahan fought off a Mount Abraham defender on a 50-50 ball to spin a pass into inviting space for MacLellan. From there, MacLellan took several dribbles before unloading from 20 yards high into the back of the net for the 1-0 lead.

“A lot of my goals this season have been from distance. I find some space at the top of the box and just look for the net,” MacLellan said. “I know that I can (score) and I like to take them any time I get them.”

Advertisement

MacLellan’s insurance tally was even more impressive. Tomasi, the other senior co-captain, set up MacLellan from about 25 yards away. MacLellan uncorked a blast that took a short-hop right in front of Mount Abraham goalie Rosemary Behounek (four saves), skipping into the net for the 2-0 margin.

“Those shots that Holley hit, those were bangers,” Mount Abraham coach Dustin Corrigan said. “It wasn’t an unwinnable game. We came here to win and we knew it was going to be a difficult task. Credit to Milton, credit to Holley — those are some incredible finishes.”

The Eagles (12-6) reached their first final in 10 years following their penalty shootout win over Harwood in the semifinals on Wednesday.

“We came into this match with a lot of miles on our legs, but I’m not going to make any excuses. We were excited to play and Milton played a heck of a good game,” Corrigan said. “I’m very proud of the effort our girls put out there. They stuck together and they didn’t quit.”

Advertisement

Although Milton graduates nine seniors, Fogel casted warning for all challengers for the 2025 season: The Yellowjackets are the queens of D-II girls soccer in Vermont until someone else says otherwise.

“People need to recognize that and respecting that instead of overlooking us every season,” Fogel said. “Because we have quite a program that won’t go anywhere anytime soon.”

Contact Alex Abrami at aabrami@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on X, formerly known as Twitter: @aabrami5.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

In Vermont’s most competitive Senate races, 10 wealthy families contributed one-third of GOP candidates’ donations – VTDigger

Published

on

In Vermont’s most competitive Senate races, 10 wealthy families contributed one-third of GOP candidates’ donations – VTDigger


In Vermont’s five most competitive state Senate races, 10 generous families contributed more than one-third of all campaign donations to the Republican nominees, as of an Oct. 15 filing deadline.

Democrats in those five races, by comparison, can thank their top 10 highest individual contributors — among them, the candidates themselves and their family members — for one-fifth of their total fundraising numbers as of mid-October. That’s according to a VTDigger analysis of campaign finance data for the Caledonia, Chittenden North, Grand Isle, Orange and Orleans district races.

None of the five Republican nominees — Scott Beck, Chris Mattos, Pat Brennan, Larry Hart and Sam Douglass — are Senate incumbents, who historically have steep advantages, both at the polls and in fundraising. Beck, Mattos and Brennan are, however, current members of the Vermont House.

Advertisement

These races are widely seen as the GOP’s best opportunities to flip Democratic districts in the Senate and crack the latter party’s two-thirds supermajority. There are currently 23 Democrats and Progressives in the chamber and just seven Republicans. 

GOP Gov. Phil Scott has been campaigning to support these down-ballot Republicans, telling Vermonters that his agenda depends on denting the Dems’ numbers. To reliably sustain his vetoes, Republicans would have to flip four seats. 

For 10 wealthy families, that potential outcome is worth dropping a substantial amount of cash.

Take, for instance, the five Republican candidates’ greatest familial benefactors: the Pizzagallis, who made their fortune in construction and real estate development. Four members of the family — Angelo, James, Jon and Remo Pizzagalli — each contributed about $1,000 to all five of the Republican Senate candidates. (Nineteen of the family’s 20 contributions to those five faces were for $1,000 exactly. The sole exception was the $960.60 Jon Pizzagalli donated to Hart of Orange County.)

Advertisement

In an election in which Vermont’s rising cost of living and tax burden have dominated campaign trail rhetoric, Vermont Democratic Party executive director Jim Dandeneau said that these high-dollar donations suggest it’s Vermont’s wealthiest who are driving the conversation — not everyday Vermonters.

“The Republicans have tried to portray this as some kind of organic uprising about Democrats in Montpelier, and that’s not the case,” he said. “Democrats have spent the last eight years talking about building a Vermont that works for everybody, and not just the wealthy few. And the wealthy few are pretty upset about that, apparently.”

Scott’s campaign manager, Jason Maulucci, said he disagreed. “Talk to almost any member of their caucus,” he said of the Democrats. “Many of them have said it’s the number one issue they’re hearing when they’re going door-to-door.”

“To suggest that regular Vermonters aren’t feeling the pinch from higher property taxes and a new payroll tax, increased DMV fees, potentially seeing their home heating fuel costs go up billions of dollars — to suggest that they don’t care would be pretty tone-deaf,” Maulucci said.

Vermont’s campaign contribution limit from a single source, meaning an individual or a political action committee, is $1,680 for state Senate candidates, according to the Vermont Secretary of State’s Office. But that doesn’t mean families can’t coordinate their efforts to maximize their impact on local races. 

Advertisement

The Pizzagallis are not alone in seeking to change the balance of power in the Senate. 

In its data analysis, VTDigger cross-referenced identical last names and addresses (as well as a number of common spelling irregularities) in campaign finance records to calculate the impact of Vermont’s wealthiest individual donors on the most closely watched legislative races. The totals may undercount total donations from these families, since not all members may share the same last name.

Five people with the last name Tarrant — related to Richard Tarrant, the founder of health care technology company IDX, philanthropist and 2006 Republican Senate nominee — donated more than $14,000 to four of the five Republican candidates. (To date, Mattos has not received a single check from a Tarrant.) Beck received the greatest amount of support from five members of the family, totalling $5,000, though none of them report living in Caledonia County, where Beck is running.

In total, the 10 families contributed 34% of all individual contributions to the five Republicans, as of October 15. The families’ cumulative contributions ranged from the Pizzagallis’ near-$20,000, to roughly $5,000 from Mark and Rick Bove, whose family operated the since-shuttered Bove’s Cafe in Burlington, owns the eponymous pasta sauce company and whose real estate empire has drawn negative headlines in recent years. 

Advertisement

Several of the major donor families are involved in Vermont’s real estate industry, but not all.

The Ortons, who contributed nearly $7,000 to four of the five GOP candidates as of Oct. 15, founded the Vermont Country Store. The Dubruls, who distributed $5,000 among three campaigns, own and operate the Automasters car dealership enterprise. Paul Plunkett, a veteran executive of Hickok & Boardman Insurance Group, is the New England manager for the national insurance company Acrisure; he and his wife, Gina Plunkett (whose maiden name is Pizzagalli), together donated a total of $5,000 to Beck, Brennan, Douglass and Mattos.

As of Oct. 15, half of the 10 families had donated to all five Republican candidates; four donated to four; and one to three.

Another round of campaign finance reports were due to the Secretary of State’s Office by midnight Friday, after this story was published. The reports filed by publication time suggested that the families still had more cash to spare. In their Nov. 1 filings, Hart reported receiving $1,000 from Steele Dubrul of Shelburne and $960.60 from Eliot Orton of Steamboat Springs, Colorado.

To Dandeneau, the pattern of giving suggests some level of coordination between these high-rollers, a situation that is hardly uncommon. Maulucci, too, said, “It’s clear that they’re talking to each other.”

Advertisement

“There’s a group of those business folks who are upset with the direction that the state’s going,” Maulucci said. “Not all of them are Republicans even, and they are trying to make a difference and give support to candidates they think will be more focused on making Vermont more affordable.”

What is different this time around, Dandeneau said, is Scott’s involvement in down-ballot races.

“This is Phil Scott making a play for a more pliable legislature, and he’s tapping into the folks who have historically funded his races,” he said, adding, “If we had 10 ungodly wealthy families on our side, I’d be doing the same thing for our people.”

Maulucci acknowledged that the Scott campaign had been in contact with some of the families, noting that many of them had contributed to his campaign, as well. 

“Often they’re asking us who we think are in competitive races, so we point to candidates that the governor is supporting,” Maulucci said. “And obviously, there’s been a lot of public attention to the Senate being particularly competitive, and the governor’s been on the stump campaigning for those candidates. So folks who have given to the governor and want to help out the governor might put two and two together and support some of those candidates.”

Advertisement

The Pizzagallis have donated more than $15,000 to Scott this cycle. Former Wall Street executive and gubernatorial candidate Bruce Lisman has sent $2,500 his way.

Calls to members of several of the donor families were not returned. 

VTDigger also analyzed comparable data from the five Democrats running for these seats: Amanda Cochrane in the Caledonia district, Irene Wrenner in Chittenden North, Andy Julow in Grand Isle, Mark MacDonald in Orange and Katherine Sims in Orleans. Wrenner, Julow and MacDonald are incumbents (though Julow was only appointed to fill a vacancy in May). Sims is a member of the House.

Excluding contributions from the Vermont Democratic Party and political action committees (the Vermont NEA Fund, for instance, provided the maximum allowable contributions to Cochrane, Julow and Sims), Democrats’ major supporters contributed noticeably less money to hold onto the five Senate seats. While the Republicans’ top 10 donor families contributed at least $80,000 across five races, Democrats collected just $22,000 from their top supporters.

Advertisement

“Not that our money came exclusively from small-dollar donations, but the bulk of our money was raised through nose-to-the-grindstone hustle, and not 10 phone calls,” Dandeneau said.

Four out of 10 of those top contributing families, however, were related to the candidates — or included the candidates themselves. Julow, for instance, donated or loaned himself more than $10,000 of his own money as of Oct. 15; his wife, Kim Julow, donated another $1,000 to his effort. Sims and her family members contributed roughly $4,500 to hers. Wrenner loaned herself $2,050. And Cochrane’s husband, John Raser, and her mother-in-law, Gail Raser, sent a combined $1,850 to the first-time candidate.

Republicans’ fundraising totals in the five races eclipse those of their Democratic counterparts when taking into account smaller donations, too. In total, Republicans raised $235,000 across all five races, compared to Democrats’ $166,000, as of the filing of their Oct. 15 reports.

One ripple effect of major donors’ input into these races is becoming clear: The grand total amount of money raised per state Senate race appears to be climbing.

In the Chittenden North district, first-term Democrat Wrenner raised $16,000 in 2022, and $18,000 by Oct. 15. By that time in 2022, her Republican challenger, former state Rep. Leland Morgan, raised a comparable amount: $17,000.

Advertisement

This year, Wrenner’s challenger, Mattos, raised more than twice that by Oct. 15: $41,000.

“It is surprising,” Dandeneau said of the jump. “It’s completely out of the ordinary.”

He added, “It remains to be seen if this is a blip or a trend. I would like to say that it’s a blip. I’m concerned that it’s a trend.”





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont to receive more than $20 million to help folks heat their homes this winter

Published

on

Vermont to receive more than  million to help folks heat their homes this winter


Vermont will receive $20.7 million from the federal government for its program to help ensure Vermonters can heat their homes this winter without risking shutoffs, according to a news release.

The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program also offers energy efficiency upgrades with the funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, according to Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vermont, who announced the funding on Thursday.

“In Vermont, the cost of heating a home in the winter can be a real challenge for families, and we want folks to know that there are organizations and federal programs available to help now before the temperatures really take a turn,” Welch said in a statement. “I’m encouraged to see Vermont has access to more LIHEAP funding this fall and will continue to fight for resources to keep families warm throughout the cold Vermont winters.”

To find out more about the program, go to the LIHEAP Eligibility Tool, from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, to determine if you’re eligible for assistance. Vermonters can also apply for heating help at Vermont Fuel Assistance.

Advertisement

Contact Dan D’Ambrosio at 660-1841 or ddambrosio@freepressmedia.com. Follow him on Twitter @DanDambrosioVT.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending