Connect with us

Vermont

Rutland ramps up incentives, cuts red tape, in push for 1,000 new housing units by 2028 – VTDigger

Published

on

Rutland ramps up incentives, cuts red tape, in push for 1,000 new housing units by 2028 – VTDigger


The Housing Trust of Rutland County’s East Creek Commons housing project on Thursday, November 14. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

Over a year ago, Rutland City Mayor Mike Doenges announced the goal of creating 1,000 new housing units by 2028. The mayor recognized that, on paper, the roughly 60 new units in development this past year is a far cry from being on track towards his admittedly “lofty” target. But Doenges said he anticipated a slow start and much of the work in year one has been to address bureaucratic roadblocks to get the momentum rolling. 

“I think it’s going better than I could have hoped,” Doenges recently said of his housing plan. “I don’t think we’ve seen that kind of burst of development in a very long time in our city so I take that as a very, very positive sign that we’re heading in the right direction.”

One of Doenges’ main affordable housing partners, the Housing Trust of Rutland County, has two projects in the works in Rutland City: 22 new units at the East Creek Commons on Columbian Avenue and 30 new units on Forest Street. It is also working on a 24-unit housing project in West Rutland.

Devon Neary, executive director of the Rutland Regional Planning Commission, sees affordable housing projects as a vital part of the solution to Rutland’s housing crisis. 

Advertisement

“When we really look at housing development, it needs to be along a spectrum,” said Neary. “We need to make sure that we are retaining the population that we have and providing housing for everyone within their affordable range.”

The region’s home sales and rental costs rose at a steep rate in the past few years and people living in Rutland have felt this impact in their wallets, he said. The average one-bedroom rental cost in Rutland County jumped from $780 in 2019 to $911 in 2023, and the median home sale increased from $150,000 in 2018 to $229,000 in 2022, based on a housing needs assessment by Vermont Housing Finance Agency conducted last year. 

This has left about half of the renter households in Rutland County cost-burdened, according to federal standards — a quarter of renters paid between 30% to 50% of their income on rent and 24% paid more than half their monthly earnings on rent in 2021. 

Mary Cohen, executive director of the housing trust, said that while the trust is doing its best to contribute affordable housing, its capacity as a public developer is not enough to fill the need for varied types of housing in the city. Rutland’s rents are not high enough to attract private developers who need assurance of a return on investment for housing projects, she said.

The Housing Trust of Rutland County’s East Creek Commons housing project on Thursday, November 14. Photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

“It can’t just be the affordable housing organizations that are doing this. It’s a lot of private developers that need to step to the plate as well,” Cohen said.

Advertisement

Recognizing that Rutland’s affordable housing organizations are already “neck-deep” in projects, Doenges has looked for ways to encourage more market-rate housing development and bring in private developers. 

The mayor said that he sees his role as two-fold: to encourage and welcome new residents, and to “get out of the way” of developers by helping to remove costs and zoning barriers that slow down projects.

Doenges worked with the Rutland Heritage Family Credit Union to spearhead a program called Roofs Over Rutland, which received $8 million last month to provide low-interest-rate loans to developers. 

Of that funding, which came from the state treasurer’s “10% in Vermont” local investment program, $5 million will be designated for projects of five or more units. The other $3 million will go towards smaller-scale projects. There have been more than a dozen housing development loan requests since Roofs Over Rutland’s roll out, according to Doenges. 

30 years ago, downtown Rutland decided its future. Today, it’s back to the drawing board.Advertisement


“That’s very encouraging, because it does prove the fact that there have been developers waiting in the wings for interest rates to come down, to reinvest and bring units online,” he said.

Other steps include reducing prohibitive permitting fees and wastewater water allocation permits, which have been lowered from $4 per gallon to 25 cents per gallon for residential developments, Doenges said.

Advertisement

Due to modernized zoning and existing development in the area, Neary said Rutland is also positioned to take full advantage of the recent loosening of Act 250 regulations through Act 181, passed by the Legislature in June. Doenges, Neary and Cohen all agreed this legislative change will cut costs and speed up operations for developers. 

The Rutland Regional Planning Commission has also recently released a housing guide for developers, which Neary said has helped bring clarity to the housing production process.

“We’ve heard from several developers that that guidance document has been monumental in removing some of the barriers, especially information barriers for accessing public money and incentives for housing development and really bringing resources directly to those developers fingertips,” said Neary. 

The Board of Aldermen is also considering an ordinance to place limits on short-term rentals. Michael Talbott, the board’s president, said this would hopefully have the trickle-down effect of making more housing available in Rutland. Other municipalities in Vermont that have regulated short-term rentals include Burlington, Stowe, Killington, Woodstock, Londonderry, Tunbridge and Plymouth.

Talbott said that he recognizes a need to be more thoughtful about reining in the unfettered short-term rental market and protecting renters in Rutland. 

Advertisement

“We have people who tell us their landlord evicted them, turned their long-term apartment that they liked and always paid for into an Airbnb,” said Talbott. “Obviously, we need short-term rentals in Rutland, but how many do we need and where do we need them? Because we know we also need long-term rentals in a really significant way.” 

Neary said despite the “slow roll,” the lessening of regulatory barriers in concert with programs like Roofs Over Rutland mark significant headway towards tackling the region’s housing woes. The city’s success, Neary continued, will be key to addressing the housing shortage in the county as a whole, which is estimated to need around 7,000 additional housing units for renters and homeowners by 2040, according to the housing finance agency study. 

“Housing doesn’t just pop up out of nowhere. I think what is most critical is that the city of Rutland is really laying the foundation for significant housing growth,” said Neary. 





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Wrong-way driver stopped on I-89, charged with DUI

Published

on

Wrong-way driver stopped on I-89, charged with DUI


BOLTON, Vt. (WCAX) – A wrong-way driver was safely stopped on Interstate 89 overnight Sunday.

Vermont State Police say just before 12:30 a.m., they stopped the car near marker 77, near Bolton.

The driver, Denise Lear, 60, of Revere, was charged with driving under the influence and gross negligent operation.

Lear is expected in court Monday.

Advertisement

Copyright 2026 WCAX. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Women’s Lacrosse Bested in Burlington by Vermont – University at Albany Great Danes

Published

on

Women’s Lacrosse Bested in Burlington by Vermont – University at Albany Great Danes


Score: UAlbany 4, Vermont 14

Location: Virtue Field | Burlington, Vt.

Records: UAlbany (10-5, 5-1 America East) | Vermont (8-6, 4-1 America East)

Short Story: UAlbany women’s lacrosse fell to the Vermont Catamounts on Saturday afternoon.

Advertisement

Key Stats

  • Grace Cincebox recorded a total of 14 saves with 13 goals allowed for a .565 save percentage.
  • Ravan Marsell led the Great Danes with two points on one goal and one assist.
  • Four different UAlbany players scored in the contest.
  • Reggie Williams was the team’s leader with three ground balls.
  • Delilah Mile caused a team high three turnovers.

 
How It Happened

  • The Catamounts came out of the gates hard and heavy, scoring all three goals between both sides in the first quarter.
  • Vermont would take an 8-0 lead in the second quarter before Amanda Williamson found the back of the net on a women-down goal to put the Great Danes on the board and make it 8-1.
  • The Great Danes would allow one more goal in the first half to trail 9-1 after 30-minutes of play.
  • Grace Cincebox would enter the half with 10 saves.
  • Riley Forthofer started the Great Danes off in the second half to make it a 9-2 game, before Vermont put up three more goals to take a 12-2 lead entering the final quarter of play.
  • Mya Carroll and Ravan Marsell both scored on back-to-back free-position goals to make it a 12-4 game.
  • The Catamounts finished the game with two more goals to take the win 14-4.

 
Up Next
The Great Danes will next have a bye week and wait to see the outcome of next week’s Vermont vs UMass Lowell game to see who will host the America East Tournament.

Social Central: Stay up to date with UAlbany women’s lacrosse by following the team on Instagram (@UAlbanyWLax), Facebook (UAlbany Women’s Lacrosse),  and X (@UAlbanyWLax) for all of the latest news and highlights throughout the year.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont lands two cities in America’s top 15 happiest list

Published

on

Vermont lands two cities in America’s top 15 happiest list


Is creativity the missing key to better health?

Research suggests creative activities like art, music and crafts may benefit mental health as much as other key health habits.

Here’s another reason Vermont is the best New England state: It’s home to one of the top 5 happiest cities in the United States.

Plus, it has another within the top 15.

Advertisement

Massachusetts, on the other hand, doesn’t even break the top 50. Nor, does Connecticut or Rhode Island.

The personal finance website analyzed 182 of the largest cities in the country, and ranked Boston 63rd overall. Although the city is home to some of the nation’s top universities, high-ranking hospitals, and well-regarded companies, it didn’t break the top 50.

To get the rankings, WalletHub compared the cities using 29 metrics, including life-satisfaction index, depression rate, poverty rate, job security, and acres of parkland per 1,000 residents. Each metric was graded on a 100-point scale, and cities were assigned an overall happiness score.

Here’s a look at how the cities ranked.

South Burlington is No. 4 happiest city, Burlington is No. 11

South Burlington came on top for Vermont in WalletHub’s list of the happiest cities in the United States, ranking at No. 4. In scored very high for emotional and physical well-being coming in at the No. 4 spot, which made up for coming in No. 48 for community and environment. It was No. 9 for income and employment ranking. That gave it a total happiness of score of 70.15

Advertisement

Burlington wasn’t far behind at all, taking the No. 11 spot on the list and a happiness score of 67.54. It’s highest score was for income and employment ranking where it came second. It ranked No. 13 for community and environment and No. 21 for emotional and physical well-being.

Happiest cities in the US, per WalletHub

Here are the 25 happiest cities in the U.S., and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. Fremont, California – 74.09
  2. Bismarck, North Dakota – 73.11
  3. Scottsdale, Arizona – 71.36
  4. South Burlington, Vermont – 70.15
  5. Fargo, North Dakota – 69.36
  6. Overland Park, Kansas – 68.45
  7. Charleston, South Carolina – 68.44
  8. Irvine, California – 67.99
  9. Gilbert, Arizona – 67.96
  10. San Jose, California – 67.79
  11. Burlington, Vermont – 67.54
  12. Madison, Wisconsin – 66.35
  13. Columbia, Maryland – 66.28
  14. Chandler, Arizona – 65.69
  15. Seattle, Washington – 65.62
  16. Plano, Texas – 65.34
  17. San Francisco, California – 64.99
  18. Lincoln, Nebraska – 64.90
  19. Portland, Maine – 64.59
  20. Tempe, Arizona – 64.30
  21. San Diego, California – 64.30
  22. Raleigh, North Carolina – 63.47
  23. Peoria, Arizona – 63.38
  24. Durham, North Carolina – 62.84
  25. Huntington Beach, California – 62.80

Least happy cities in the US, per WalletHub

Here are the 25 least happy cities in the U.S., and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. Detroit, Michigan (#182 overall) – 29.55
  2. Memphis, Tennessee (#181 overall) – 34.39
  3. Shreveport, Louisiana (#180 overall) – 34.93
  4. Cleveland, Ohio (#179 overall) – 36.50
  5. Huntington, West Virginia (#178 overall) – 37.20
  6. Toledo, Ohio (#177 overall) – 37.21
  7. Augusta, Georgia (#176 overall) – 38.24
  8. Fort Smith, Arkansas (#175 overall) – 38.66
  9. Dover, Delaware (#174 overall) – 39.08
  10. Akron, Ohio (#173 overall) – 40.11
  11. Baltimore, Maryland (#172 overall) – 40.28
  12. Birmingham, Alabama (#171 overall) – 40.37
  13. Baton Rouge, Louisiana (#170 overall) – 40.47
  14. Columbus, Georgia (#169 overall) – 40.61
  15. Montgomery, Alabama (#168 overall) – 41.35
  16. Gulfport, Mississippi (#167 overall) – 41.65
  17. Charleston, West Virginia (#166 overall) – 42.18
  18. Jackson, Mississippi (#165 overall) – 42.60
  19. St. Louis, Missouri (#164 overall) – 43.53
  20. Knoxville, Tennessee (#163 overall) – 44.04
  21. Wilmington, Delaware (#162 overall) – 44.34
  22. Little Rock, Arkansas (#161 overall) – 44.48
  23. Mobile, Alabama (#160 overall) – 44.85
  24. New Orleans, Louisiana (#159 overall) – 45.19
  25. Tulsa, Oklahoma (#158 overall) – 45.33

Where New England cities ranked

Here are the 12 happiest cities in New England, and their happiness scores, according to WalletHub’s 2026 list:

  1. South Burlington, Vermont (#6 overall) – 70.15
  2. Burlington, Vermont (#11 overall) – 67.54
  3. Portland, Maine (#19 overall) – 64.59
  4. Nashua, New Hampshire (#27 overall) – 62.49
  5. Manchester, New Hampshire (#51 overall) – 59.10
  6. Boston, Massachusetts (#63 overall) – 56.88
  7. Warwick, Rhode Island (#66 overall) – 56.59
  8. New Haven, Connecticut (#95 overall) – 54.14
  9. Bridgeport, Connecticut (#96 overall) – 54.01
  10. Providence, Rhode Island (#98 overall) – 53.52
  11. Worcester, Massachusetts (#116 overall) – 50.12
  12. Lewiston, Maine (#145 overall) – 47.28



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending