Connect with us

Rhode Island

URI poll measures Rhode Islanders’ opinions on election ‘hot topics’

Published

on

URI poll measures Rhode Islanders’ opinions on election ‘hot topics’


KINGSTON, R.I. – Oct. 15, 2024 – Amid a polarizing presidential campaign, a University of Rhode Island opinion poll released today finds agreement across party affiliations on issues of election integrity, trust in election officials and concerns about election-related violence – while seeing a divide in worries over voter fraud.

The poll – the second annual edition from URI’s Rhode Island Survey Initiative – surveyed a representative sample of 500 Rhode Island residents ages 18 and older between Aug. 15 and Sept. 8, 2024. The survey was administered by the highly respected polling firm YouGov via the internet; participants were chosen from YouGov’s opt-in survey panel of Rhode Island residents who agree to participate in YouGov surveys. The margin of error for the poll is +/- 6.02%.

“While there are national polls that also focus on American confidence in election administration, our survey results offer a detailed snapshot of Rhode Islanders’ levels of trust in election authorities and systems and trust in government as well as attitudes about democracy, media, policy, and political participation in the state,” said Emily Lynch, URI professor of political science. “The survey results indicate that Rhode Islanders trust state election systems, but at the same time they have concerns about the upcoming election in a number of areas, such as AI-generated fake political information and political violence.”

Majorities from each party – Democrats (92%), Independents (69%), and Republicans (55%) – say they feel votes are somewhat often or very often counted accurately. And solid majorities of all three parties – Democrats (85%), Republicans (79%), and Independents (73%) – think political violence is a somewhat or very big problem in the U.S. today. A smaller majority of all three are concerned about civil unrest after election day in Rhode Island.

Advertisement

There was a divide on questions about fraud, however. A majority of Republicans and Independents are somewhat or very concerned about voter fraud – specifically noncitizen voting, citizens voting more than once, vote tampering, and people claiming to be another person in order to vote. Democrats lagged on all four questions – with the highest level of concern (37%) found with regard to vote tampering.

The survey also asked respondents who they will vote for on Nov. 5 in the presidential race and the state’s U.S. Senate race. Among those who indicated that they were registered voters, 53% said they would vote for Vice President Kamala Harris and 27% backed former President Donald Trump, while 52% indicated they would vote for incumbent U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, and 24%, state Rep. Patricia Morgan.

The 2024 Rhode Island Survey Initiative looked at numerous topics affecting Rhode Island residents, from government spending and public schools to the blue economy and quality of life. It also included a special module on elections, trust, and democracy, which included questions about political violence and election interference. Complete results can be found on the survey website.

“The last few months have been a whirlwind in American politics and we were able to include specific hot topics at the national and state level in this year’s survey,” said Julie Keller, an associate professor of sociology and director of the Social Science Institute for Research, Education, and Policy. 

Among the key findings are:

Advertisement

Trust in election officials: A majority of respondents reported that they have a great deal or fair amount of trust in election authorities – poll workers, local boards of canvassers, the state Board of Elections and Department of State. Across party affiliations, Rhode Islanders had a fair amount or great deal of trust in the state’s voting machines, led by Democrats (93%), Republicans (71%), and Independents (69%). Meanwhile, only 34% and 35% of Republicans had a fair amount or great deal of trust in mail ballot drop boxes and mailing a ballot using the U.S. Postal Service, respectively – compared with 84% of Democrats and 43% of Independents on both mail ballot questions.

Worries about AI and R.I. elections: About 6 in 10 respondents worry artificial intelligence will somewhat or greatly hurt the election process. No matter party affiliation, the majority of respondents – 79% of Republicans, 77% of Democrats, and 77% of Independents – are somewhat or very concerned about the use of AI-generated political media, such as fake images or video, and support state legislation to ban AI-generated political media.

General Assembly election-related legislation: An overall majority of respondents also back many of the other proposed bills before the assembly related to elections. A solid majority of Republicans (80%) – and smaller majorities of Democrats (56%) and Independents (69%) – support legislation that would increase the responsibilities of the state Division of Motor Vehicles in preventing noncitizens from registering to vote. Smaller majorities support limits on who can mail another person’s mail ballot, while only a majority of Democrats (56%) approve legislation related to rank-choice voting in Rhode Island presidential primaries.

Opinions on media and politics: The top social media sites for respondents to get political and election news are Facebook (44%), YouTube (40%), Instagram (33%) and TikTok (23%). The top three national media sources for Rhode Islanders are Fox News, CNN, and NBC Nightly News. When it comes to local reporting on elections and campaigns, there is a split in opinion on the fairness of journalists. A solid majority of Democrats (80%) feel journalists provide fair coverage of elections somewhat often or very often. Meanwhile, 68% of Republicans and 66% of Independents feel Rhode Islanders are somewhat often or very often exposed to inaccurate information.

Public policy, education and quality of life: A majority of Democrats, Independents, and Republicans support an increase in spending on education, housing, and building and repairing roads. Asked to select the most important priorities for the governor and General Assembly, Democrats included housing (55%), health care (45%), and education (43%); Independents, housing (58%), health care (40%), and roads and bridges (38%); and Republicans, roads and bridges (54%), crime (53%), and housing (43%). 

Advertisement

Polled for the second year on the most important problem facing K-12 public schools in Rhode Island, the largest increase between 2023 and 2024 was in the percentage of respondents who chose insufficient funding (up six percentage points, to 29%). The poll showed a rise in satisfaction with the overall quality of life in Rhode Island over the last year, going from 45% to 52% of respondents, and perceptions that the state’s economy is very or somewhat strong, an increase of five percentage points, to 22%. Results were fairly consistent with last year’s percentages because of the poll’s margin of error.

An annual opinion poll

The Rhode Island Survey Initiative was launched last year by a team of researchers from URI’s Harrington School for Communication and Media; Social Science Institute for Research, Education, and Policy; and the Department of Political Science, with plans to conduct at least one survey of Rhode Island residents each year. Each poll will include different focus areas, with some repeated questions to gauge the change in attitudes of Rhode Island residents.

Keller said the survey initiative reflects the institute’s goal of providing evidence-based insights to communities across the state.

“The initiative continues to strengthen experiential learning opportunities for URI students while helping to inform decision-making across the state,” she said. “This year, more organizations were consulted about what topic areas should be addressed. And more faculty trained students to work with the data as well.”

Advertisement

College of Arts and Sciences Fellows Delaney Sullivan ’25 and Abigail Noetzel ’26 helped choose election topics in the survey’s election module based on research and interviews and helped construct the survey questionnaire using an online survey tool. Their research included reviewing information about local and federal elections and public opinion in academic articles, books, and reports; listening to local political podcasts and shows; and conducting interviews with state and local election officials and advocacy groups.

“Interviewing election officials allowed me to understand our election system more extensively,” said Sullivan, a double major in political science and criminology and criminal justice. “I believe that public opinion research in Rhode Island has been minimal, which is why I think this survey is vital to election officials and residents in Rhode Island, as it allows us to understand the state better.” 

“Going forward, I am confident that I can excel in my courses at URI given what I have learned through the fellowship, especially in terms of research,” said Noetzel, a double major in psychology and criminology and criminal justice. “I have developed countless transferable skills, and I am super grateful for that.”

Note about methodology

Party identification was constructed using the seven-point scale in which self-identified Democrats and Independent-leaning Democrats were combined into the “Democrat” category; self-identified Republicans and Independent-leaning Republicans were combined into the “Republican” category; and Independents are in the “Independent” category.

Advertisement



Source link

Rhode Island

Medical school at URI won’t ensure primary care docs for RI | Opinion

Published

on

Medical school at URI won’t ensure primary care docs for RI | Opinion


play

Advertisement
  • Rhode Island is currently experiencing a significant shortage of primary care physicians.
  • Opening a new medical school at URI is not seen as a timely or effective solution to the crisis.
  • Even with more medical school graduates, there is no guarantee they will choose primary care or stay in the state.
  • Better solutions include increasing pay, offering loan repayment, and reducing administrative burdens for doctors.

The doctor is not in, and there’s not one on the way either. Many Rhode Islanders are well aware that the state is facing a harrowing shortage of primary care physicians. As native Rhode Islanders and physicians invested in quality accessible primary care for our community, we are dedicated to working towards policies to support our state.

A medical school at the University of Rhode Island is not the solution to solve the primary care crisis. A medical school at URI would not provide a timely solution, would likely not achieve the target outcome of increasing the number of primary care physicians in the state, and would likely not address the underlying issue of getting doctors to stay. Instead, resources should be allocated now to supporting primary care in ways that would make sustainable change.

Lack of access to primary care is hurting patients now. A medical school at URI would not be a short- or long-term solution. In addition to the time needed to engineer an accredited medical school, it takes seven years to produce an inexperienced primary care physician. Once trained, there still must be an incentive to stay in Rhode Island. Patients do not have access to necessary care for acute and chronic conditions. The burden on our health care system, impacting ER wait times and hospital capacity, impacts everyone. We cannot afford to wait another decade for a solution.

More physicians does not equal more physicians in primary care or in Rhode Island. If the aim is to produce more physicians from URI’s medical school, this will certainly occur, but we should not delude ourselves into believing it will fix primary care. It’s not due to lack of opportunities. In 2019, the National Resident Matching Program offered a record number of primary care positions, yet the percentage filled by students graduating from MD-granting medical schools in the United States was a new low. Of 8,116 internal medical positions that were offered, just 41.5% were filled by U.S. students; most residency spots went to foreign-trained and U.S.-trained osteopathic physicians.

As medical schools across the country look to debt reduction as a means of encouraging students to enter primary care specialties, their goals have fallen far short. In 2018, The New York University School of Medicine offered full-tuition scholarships to every medical student, regardless of merit or need. In 2024, only 14% of NYU’s graduating seniors entered primary care, lower than the national average of 30%.

Advertisement

There must be an incentive to stay in Rhode Island (or at least not a disadvantage). Our efforts must shift to recruiting and maintaining physicians in primary care. Inequitable reimbursement from commercial insurers between Rhode Island and neighboring states (leading to significantly lower salaries than if you lived here and traveled to Attleboro to care for patients), the lack of loan repayment(average medical student debt is $250,000, forcing the choice between meaning and money), and the ongoing administrative burdens are amongst the drivers away from primary care. Rhode Island needs to get on par with surrounding states to prevent physicians from going elsewhere.

The motivations behind opening a medical school are well intended in terms of wanting to increase the number of primary care providers by enabling local talent to train close to home. Training more people in Rhode Island will not keep them here; it will invest significant resources without addressing the root of the issue. Until there are comparable salaries between Rhode Island and our neighbors, until loan repayment is improved and the administrative burdens are reduced, primary care in the state will forever be fighting an uphill battle. Both providers and patients suffer the consequences.

Dr. Kelly McGarry is the director of the General Internal Medicine Residency at Rhode Island Hospital. Dr. Maria Iannotti is a first-year resident, a Rhode Islander intent on practicing primary care in Rhode Island.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Truckers ordered to pay own legal bills from failed RI toll lawsuit

Published

on

Truckers ordered to pay own legal bills from failed RI toll lawsuit


play

The trucking industry will have to pay its own legal bills for the unsuccessful eight-year-old lawsuit it brought to stop Rhode Island’s truck toll system, a federal judge ruled Friday, March 27.

The American Trucking Associations was seeking $21 million in attorneys fees and other costs from the state, but a decision from U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr. says the truckers lost the case and will have to pick up the tab.

Advertisement

The state had previously filed a counterclaim for reimbursement of $9 million in legal bills, but an earlier recommendation from U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan had already thrown cold water on that possibility.

McConnell ordered American Trucking Associations to pay Rhode Island $199,281, a tiny fraction of the amount the state spent defending the network of tolls on tractor trailers.

Settling the lawyer tab may finally bring an end to a court fight that bounced back and forth through the federal judiciary since the toll system launched and the truckers brought suit in 2018.

As it stands, the state’s truck toll network has been mothballed since 2022 when a since-overturned judge’s ruling temporarily ruled it unconstitutional.

Advertisement

The Rhode Island Department of Transportation said it hopes to relaunch the tolls around March 2027.

The court costs fight hinged on which side could claim legal “prevailing party” status as the winner of the lawsuit.

The trucking industry claimed that it had won because the First Circuit Court of Appeals ruled an in-state trucker discount mechanism, known as caps, in the original truck toll system was unconstitutional.

But Rhode Island argued that it is the winner because the appeals court had ruled that the larger system and broad concept of truck tolls is constitutional and can relaunch with the discounts stripped out.

“The Court determines that ATA has vastly overstated the benefit, if any, that they have received from the ultimate resolution of their challenge to the RhodeWorks program,” McConnell wrote.

Advertisement

The truckers “failed to obtain any practical benefit from the First Circuit’s severance of the [in-state toll] caps,” he went on. “Specifically, the evidence from this dispute confirmed that the lack of daily caps will result in ATA paying a higher amount in daily tolls and that it does not receive any tangible financial benefit from their elimination.”

In her December analysis of the legal fees question, Sullivan had concluded that the Trucking Associations’ outside counsel had overbilled and overstaffed the case.

But she had recommended that the industry be reimbursed $2.7 million for its bills, while McConnell’s ruling gives it nothing.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Think you’re middle class in Rhode Island? Here’s the income range

Published

on

Think you’re middle class in Rhode Island? Here’s the income range


play

Your household can earn more than $160,000 a year and still be considered part of the “middle class” in Rhode Island, according to a recent study by SmartAsset.

Rhode Island is the state with the 17th-highest income range for households to be considered middle class, based on SmartAsset’s analysis using 2024 income data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Pew Research Center defines the middle class as households earning roughly two-thirds to twice the national median household income.

Advertisement

According to a 2022 Gallup survey, about half of U.S. adults consider themselves middle class, with 38% identifying as “middle class” and 14% as “upper-middle class.” Higher-income Americans and college graduates were most likely to identify with the “middle class” or “upper-middle class,” while lower-income Americans and those without a college education generally identified as “working class” or “lower class.”

Here’s how much money your household would need to bring in annually to be considered middle class in Rhode Island.

How much money would you need to make to be considered middle class in RI?

In Rhode Island, households would need to earn between $55,669 and $167,008 annually to be considered middle class, according to SmartAsset. The Ocean State has the 17th-highest income range in the country for middle-class households.

The state’s median household income is $83,504.

Advertisement

How do other New England states compare?

Rhode Island has the fourth-highest income range for middle-class households in New England. Here’s what households would have to earn in neighboring states:

  1. Massachusetts (#1 nationally) – $69,885 to $209,656 annually; median household income of $104,828
  2. New Hampshire (#6 nationally) – $66,521 to $199,564 annually; median household income of $99,782
  3. Connecticut (#10 nationally) – $64,033 to $192,098 annually; median household income of $96,049
  4. Rhode Island (#17 nationally) – $55,669 to $167,008 annually; median household income of $83,504
  5. Vermont (#19 nationally) – $55,153 to $165,460 annually; median household income of $82,730
  6. Maine (#30 nationally) – $50,961 to $152,884 annually; median household income of $76,442

Which state has the highest middle-class income range?

Massachusetts ranks as the state with the highest income range to be considered middle class, according to SmartAsset. Households there would need to earn between $69,900 and $209,656 annually. The state’s median household income is $104,828.

Which state has the lowest middle-class income range?

Mississippi ranks last for the income range needed to be considered middle class, according to SmartAsset. Households there would need to earn between $39,418 and $118,254 annually. The state’s median household income is $59,127.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending