Connect with us

Rhode Island

Poll: Biden holds single-digit lead in RI; McKee job approval slumps to 36%

Published

on

Poll: Biden holds single-digit lead in RI; McKee job approval slumps to 36%


NEWPORT, R.I. (WPRI) — President Biden is down to a single-digit lead over former President Trump in Rhode Island, according to a new survey released Tuesday, while Gov. Dan McKee’s job approval rating has taken a hit.

The poll by Salve Regina University’s Pell Center surveyed 1,450 Rhode Island voters who said they are likely to vote in the November election, asking their current opinions about a host of incumbent elected officials as well as how they plan to vote in some key races this fall.

The poll shows a surprisingly close race for president in Rhode Island, a reliably blue state that has voted for the Democratic nominee every four years since 1988. The survey shows Biden at 40%, Trump at 33% and independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at 12%, with about one in 10 voters undecided.

“I’m really kind of surprised at this number,” said 12 News political analyst Joe Fleming, who has been polling the state for years but was not involved in the Pell Center survey.

Advertisement

Biden’s weakness is due in part to his muted support among Rhode Island Democrats, only 72% of whom are supporting their party’s incumbent. That compares with Trump’s 87% support among Rhode Island Republicans.

Kennedy — a legendary political name in Southern New England — is backed by 8% of Democrats and 17% of independents in the survey. Among independents, the largest voter bloc in Rhode Island, Trump is winning 39% and Biden is winning 25%.

“It shows that there could be a closer race in Rhode Island than people expect,” Fleming said. “However, we’re still in June. And the one thing I know in Rhode Island from past history is Democrats tend to come home toward the end.”

The survey was conducted online and via text message by Embold Research, the nonpartisan arm of San Francisco-based firm Change Research, from June 5 to June 14. The poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points.

The president fared far better in a different poll of Rhode Island voters released by the University of New Hampshire last month. That survey showed Biden at 52%, Trump at 33% and Kennedy at 6%, with only 5% of voters undecided.

Advertisement

Biden won Rhode Island in the 2020 election with 59% of the vote, while Trump got 39%. The two men are set to face off in this year’s first presidential debate on Thursday at 9 p.m., the earliest TV debate ever since the practice began in 1960.

Biden’s weak showing against Trump in the survey is also reflected in his job approval rating. Only 42% of likely Rhode Island voters approve of the job Biden is doing as president, while 54% disapprove — including a whopping 44% who say they “strongly disapprove” of Biden’s performance.

Yet the lack of enthusiasm for Biden isn’t the same as enthusiasm for Trump. Among likely Rhode Island voters, 57% think the New York jury that convicted Trump in the recent “hush money” trial made the right decision, while only 35% believe the jury got it wrong, according to the survey.

Washington Bridge crisis weighs on McKee

Less than two years after winning a full four-year term as governor, McKee is getting low marks from Rhode Islanders in the Pell Center survey.

The poll finds only 36% of likely voters approve of the job McKee is doing as governor, while 54% disapprove. About one in three voters — 32% — say they “strongly disapprove” of McKee’s performance, compared with just 8% who say they “strongly approve.”

Advertisement

“He has to get out and sell what he’s been doing a lot better than he’s been doing so far,” Fleming said.

Opinions are even more negative about how McKee has handled the biggest crisis he’s faced in the last six months, the abrupt closure of the westbound Washington Bridge.

The Pell Center survey shows 59% of likely voters disapprove of how McKee has handled the bridge closure to date, while only 29% approve. Even among McKee’s fellow Democrats, just 43% approve of how he has managed the bridge crisis.

The survey shows 60% of likely Rhode Island voters believe the state is off on the wrong track, while 40% believe the state is headed in the right direction.

Under Rhode Island’s term-limit rules, McKee is eligible to run for another term in 2026 because his first two years as governor were spent finishing Gina Raimondo’s unexpired second term. In an interview last week on 12 News at 4, McKee indicated he is planning to run again.

Advertisement

“We have a Rhode Island 2030 plan,” McKee said, adding, “Everything being said — certainly not an announcement — but my intention is to kind of see that plan all the way through to 2030.”

Fleming said McKee and his advisers have reasons for optimism despite the survey results, pointing out that Raimondo faced low job approval ratings throughout much of her term yet still managed to win re-election in 2018.

“It’s way early on this,” he said.

Most other elected Democrats fared better in the poll than McKee and Biden.

U.S. Sen. Jack Reed, who is perennially the most popular politician in Rhode Island, took that crown once again. The survey shows 58% of likely voters approve of the job Reed is doing as senator, while only 28% disapprove. (Reed is next up for re-election in 2026.)

Advertisement

U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, who is up for re-election this year, once again polled lower than his senior counterpart. The survey shows 48% of likely voters approve of the job Whitehouse is doing as senator, while 38% disapprove.

Rhode Island’s two freshmen congressmen — Gabe Amo and Seth Magaziner — are both in solid shape with voters as they prepare to seek re-election for the first time, though they remain lesser known than more veteran Democrats.

In the 1st Congressional District, 42% of likely voters approve of the early job performance by Amo, who won a special election last fall to succeed David Cicilline, against 27% who disapprove. In the 2nd District, 51% of likely voters approve of Magaziner’s job performance, versus 31% who disapprove.

Amo, who had never served in office before being elected to Congress, remains lesser-known than Magaziner. Almost one in three 1st District voters had no opinion about Amo, compared with only 18% of 2nd District voters who were unsure about Magaziner.

Lt. Gov. Sabina Matos has the lowest job approval rating of any elected official in the poll, following the signature scandal that rocked her failed congressional campaign last year. Only 27% of likely voters approve of the job Matos is doing, while 39% disapprove and 35% don’t know.

Advertisement

Democrats lead in RI races for Congress

The survey shows all the Democrats in Rhode Island’s federal delegation are in strong shape to win in November.

In the race for U.S. Senate, Whitehouse is backed by 48% of likely voters, while 34% say they will back “the Republican candidate.” (State Rep. Patricia Morgan and Warwick’s Ray McKay are vying for the GOP nomination.) Whitehouse won his last re-election race, in 2018, with 61% of the vote.

In the 1st Congressional District, Amo is backed by 50% of likely voters, while 29% support his potential Republican rival Allen Waters. In the 2nd District, Magaziner is supported by 47% of likely voters, while 33% back his Republican opponent Steve Corvi.

The Pell Center also asked voters a variety of questions beyond specific candidates and races. Katie Sonder, associate director and fellow at the Pell Center, who oversaw the poll, said: “These survey results paint a picture of a somewhat anxious electorate.”

While Rhode Island voters are patriotic about the nation — 71% said their American identity is “very important” to them, compared with only 40% who said the same about their Rhode Island identity — most are worried about the country politically. Among likely voters, 38% say U.S. democracy is “not at all” healthy and 22% say it is only “slightly” healthy, while 28% say it is “moderately” healthy.

Advertisement

Most likely voters think political polarization increased over the last year, and nearly half blame “disinformation and fake news” for that fact. More than one-third of voters say they actively try to avoid the news.

Ted Nesi (tnesi@wpri.com) is a Target 12 investigative reporter and 12 News politics/business editor. He co-hosts Newsmakers and writes Nesi’s Notes on Saturdays. Connect with him on Twitter, Threads and Facebook.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Rhode Island

Brown University transfers 225 acres of land to Pokanoket tribe in Rhode Island

Published

on

Brown University transfers 225 acres of land to Pokanoket tribe in Rhode Island


Local News

The land was the ancestral home site of a historic leader of the Pokanoket Tribe who died during King Philip’s War in 1676.

Members of the Pokanoket Indian Tribe, led by Sachem Dancing Star, opened the gate to a 255-acre site in Bristol, R.I., on Sunday after Brown University transferred the land to a tribal trust. Courtesy of Sachem Dancing Star

Brown University transferred 225 acres in Bristol, Rhode Island to a preservation trust established by the Pokanoket Tribe, an Indigenous tribe with historic and cultural ties to the property.

Brown acquired a 375-acre property in 1955 at Mount Hope, where the university has its Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology and an outing center. The museum will be moved to Providence, the Ivy League university said.

Advertisement

Mount Hope is also the ancestral home of Metacom, a leader of the Pokanoket also known as King Philip who died there during King Philip’s War in 1676. Metacom was the chief sachem of the Wampanoag when the English purchased their land in the 1670s. 

The transfer comes after a 2017 agreement that ended a month-long Pokanoket encampment at the site.

The Pokanoket Tribe’s sachem (or chief), Tracey “Dancing Star” Trezvant Guy told The Boston Globe that the tribe plans to get an assessment of the land, which is known as Potumtuk, meaning “the lookout of the Pokanoket.”

“The significance of this land goes back to time immemorial for our people,” she said in a statement to the Globe. “For the first time in over 340 years, we unlocked the gates to the property for ourselves and walked onto our land. That is significant. It is historical.”

The land transfer, which can’t be amended, says the Pokanoket “shall at all times and in perpetuity provide and maintain access to the lands and waters of the Property to all members of all Tribes historically part of the Pokanoket Nation/Confederacy, and to all members of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah), the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, the Assonet Band of the Wampanoag Nation, the Herring Pond Wampanoag Tribe and the Pocasset Tribe of the Pokanoket Nation.”

Advertisement

Russell Carey, executive vice president for planning and policy at Brown, said the original donation to the university asked for the university to be mindful of “the property’s great natural beauty, its historical background or the best interests of the Bristol community.”

“Those words remain as true and relevant today as when they were written nearly 70 years ago, and the steps we are taking to preserve the land in perpetuity are, we believe, fully consistent with that vision,” Carey said.

Brown is selling the rest of the property to the Town of Bristol for preservation and conversation. The sale will be finalized in early 2025.

Profile image for Molly Farrar

Molly Farrar is a general assignment reporter for Boston.com, focusing on education, politics, crime, and more.






Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

CRMC under fire after postponed hearing on Quidnessett Country Club • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

CRMC under fire after postponed hearing on Quidnessett Country Club • Rhode Island Current


The embattled Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council is awash in criticism again — not for a controversial decision, but for the lack of one.

In a Nov. 25 email to the council, also shared on its website, Save the Bay Executive Director Topher Hamblett accused the panel of coastal regulators of “political favoritism and abuse of power.”

A council subcommittee was scheduled to hold a hearing at 4 p.m. Tuesday on Quidnessett Country Club’s application to ease development restrictions for its waterfront property in North Kingstown. But the meeting was cancelled, extending the saga over an illegal seawall built along the club’s shoreline nearly two years ago.

Hamblett alleges the delays are intentional.

Advertisement
Topher Hamblett (Courtesy photo)

“The Council’s months-long series of delays gives the country club an unfair economic advantage over law-abiding coastal landowners and businesses who spend money and time applying for permits to comply with the law,” he wrote in the email. 

“The Council is opening the door for more violations and sending the message that it is better to ask for forgiveness than permission. Additionally, the Council’s lack of consistency and fairness undermines the integrity of Rhode Island’s coastal governance, the protection of our coastal ecosystems and the public’s ability to access the shore.”

In January 2023, the country club built a 600-foot-long stone wall between its golf course and the shoreline — violating existing coastal regulations intended to protect the sensitive coastal marshes that feed into Narragansett Bay. After the rock wall was discovered, with subsequent fines and warnings levied by state and federal regulators, the club sought to retroactively keep its illegal barrier in place.

Quidnessett’s April 12 petition, if approved, would downgrade the water classification from the existing Type 1 “conservation area” to a less stringent Type 2 “low intensity use,” which could — though it doesn’t have to — allow for a permanent structure like a seawall. Under the existing designation, all permanent structures are banned.

A council subcommittee took public comment, but postponed a vote on the water type redesignation at a September meeting, in order to give the country club more time to make its case. The club, through its attorneys, said a permanent barrier is needed to protect the flagship 18-hole golf course against rising sea levels. 

Advertisement

Tuesday’s meeting would have been the next occasion to consider, and potentially make a recommendation on the application. The panel vote would advance the proposal to the full council, which would then review and make its own decision at a later date.

The Council’s months-long series of delays gives the country club an unfair economic advantage over law-abiding coastal landowners and businesses who spend money and time applying for permits to comply with the law.

– Topher Hamblett, executive director for Save the Bay

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the seawall still stands, much to Hamblett’s dismay.

“This has all the appearances of the council wanting to accommodate Quidnessett Country Cub’s request to, in effect, let the wall stand,” Hamblett said in an interview Tuesday. “I think that, left to its own devices, they would do just that.”

Hamblett acknowledged that he did not know why the meeting was cancelled; the council has been plagued by vacancies which have led to a string of postponed meetings and key decisions.

Laura Dwyer, a spokesperson for the CRMC, said in an email late Tuesday that the meeting was postponed due to “scheduling issues.” She did not answer specific questions seeking comment about Hamblett’s letter.

Advertisement

Janice Matthews, vice president of The Jan Companies, which owns the country club, also did not respond to inquiries for comment.

The council’s staff in a Sept. 20 report argued against approving the water type reclassification, stressing the importance of the sensitive salt marshes surrounding the shoreline, along with marine wildlife, which were the very reason why the agency restricted development there in the first place — formally codified under state water type classifications created in the early 1980s.

But the politically appointed council doesn’t have to follow the recommendations of its expert staff; it hasn’t in other high-profile decisions.

Most notably, the council in 2020 approved a contested expansion of Champlin’s Marina on Block Island, against advice of staff, with terms brokered in what the town and conservation groups alleged was a “backroom deal.” The Rhode Island Supreme Court tossed the council’s decision in a 2022 ruling, agreeing with Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha that the council flouted its own public notice requirements.

Quidnessett Country Club built a 600-foot-long rock wall along its shoreline in the winter of 2023, flouting state coastal regulations and obscuring public shoreline access. (Courtesy photo)

A question of accountability 

Hamblett sees parallels between Champlin’s case and Quidnessett, in the council’s actions, and in reactions among top state officials.

“The common denominator between Quidnessett and Champlin’s is there’s been no action from the governor or the General Assembly in terms of accountability,” Hamblett said Tuesday. “We’re concerned we’re going to see that silence continue as it relates to the country club’s accountability to the council.”

Advertisement

Other state officials who were copied on Hamblett’s email, including Gov. Dan McKee, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi and Senate President Dominick Ruggerio, had also not responded to him as of midday Tuesday, Hamblett said.

McKee and Ruggerio did not immediately respond to inquiries from Rhode Island Current for comment on Tuesday.

Shekarchi was not available for comment due to being away for the holiday, Larry Berman, a spokesperson, said in an email on Tuesday.

One exception: Neronha, whose office has already critiqued Quidnessett for flouting state coastal regulations.

“With each public hearing that is canceled, CRMC continues to demonstrate why it cannot be trusted with environmental oversight,” Neronha said in a statement on Tuesday. “Normally, when a person or entity breaks the law, there are consequences. Here, Quidnessett Country Club decided that the rules don’t apply to them, acting in total disregard of laws designed to protect our coast, and thus far, getting away with it.”

Advertisement

Earlier this year, Neronha joined Save the Bay to call for eliminating the politically appointed council, and reshaping the agency as an administrative department akin to the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management. Legislation outlining these changes was introduced but stalled in the last two legislative sessions.

“The time for CRMC reform was long ago, but we must continue the fight to place decision-making power into the hands of those who wish to protect and preserve our most treasured natural resources,” he said. “Because each day that passes without consequences for Quidnessett is another day of environmental justice delayed and denied.”

Hamblett said Save the Bay plans to push for a similar bill in the upcoming 2025 session, hoping that public attention — including 300 pages of written comment submitted to the CRMC — on Quidnessett might build support among lawmakers.

“We need top elected officials to be paying attention to our coastal agency,” Hamblett said. 

The CRMC rescheduled its hearing on Quidnessett to Dec. 10. If the water reclassification is granted, the club must then apply for a permit to build any kind of permanent structure along the shoreline.

Advertisement

Updated to include a response from the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Roger Williams, Fatima hospital sale set to close in January after license application approved • Rhode Island Current

Published

on

Roger Williams, Fatima hospital sale set to close in January after license application approved • Rhode Island Current


The end is in sight for the long-awaited sale of Roger Williams Medical Center in Providence and Our Lady of Fatima Hospital in North Providence, with a closing date finally named: January 2025.

Otis Brown, a spokesperson for CharterCARE Health Partners, revealed the expected close in an email Monday afternoon, hours after the deal received the final license approval required from the Rhode Island Department of Health. 

The $80 million sale of two of the state’s urban safety net hospitals is a long time coming. Prospect Medical Holdings, the Los Angeles-based parent company of CharterCARE, first pitched the sale to nonprofit The Centurion Foundation in May 2023. But convincing the health department and state attorney general, who under the state’s Hospital Conversions Act have oversight on hospital conversions to nonprofit status, was no easy feat.

The initial application was rejected, the second deemed incomplete, before a third and final proposal was accepted in December 2023, and in June, conditionally approved. Even then, it was unclear whether CharterCARE was willing to meet the 85 conditions imposed on the sale.

Advertisement

After months of negotiations, Rhode Island Attorney General Peter Neronha announced on Nov. 15 he would ease up on a few of the non-financial conditions imposed by his office, paving the way for the deal to advance. Meanwhile, the separate but parallel license change application received a positive recommendation from the appointed state health panel on Nov. 12.

On Monday, Dr. Jerry Larkin, state health director, confirmed the Health Service Advisory Council’s recommendation to approve the license change, removing the final state regulatory hurdle in the complex review process.

“Rhode Island needs a stable network of hospitals that supports the health and wellness of every community in the state,” Larkin said in a statement. “In light of the historical and ongoing financial and operational challenges at the hospitals, RIDOH’s Change in Effective Control decision and our Hospital Conversions Act decision came with conditions carefully developed to restore local control, help stabilize these two facilities, and help ensure that the new operators would be positioned to provide consistent, safe, high-quality care.”

The license approval comes with a few extra requirements beyond those tied to the nonprofit conversion. CharterCARE must submit regular, written reports to the health department, including data on finances and demographics of its patients, upon request, and details of any proposed changes to its board of directors. The new owners must also maintain national accreditation for the hospitals, alongside home health and hospice facilities within the network, and create a referral plan for charity care cases.

Brown indicated Monday that the buyer and seller were willing to meet these requirements.

Advertisement

“This is welcome news for our 2,700 employees and for the thousands of patients we treat annually,” Brown said. “The transacting parties will now focus attention on executing the legal sale closing, scheduled for later in January 2025. We appreciate the time and effort of the Health Services Council, and the health department staff, in reviewing these extensive applications and for the Director’s prompt decision.”

Brown did not respond to specific questions about the status of financing for the deal. On top of the requisite $80 million sale price, the parties are also required to put $80 million in capital directly into the hospitals, while setting aside $66.8 million to be held in escrow, reserved for uses other than executive compensation or management fees.

According to its application, Prospect plans to finance much of the transaction through new debt, composed of a mix of taxable and tax-exempt bonds. Another $47 million in funds already held in state escrow — tied to a 2021 state agreement when Prospect bought out former majority stakeholder Leonard Green & Partners — will be put toward the new, $66.8 million escrow fund.

The financing has been a key source of concern for critics, including the United Nurses & Allied Professionals, which represents 1,200 members who work for CharterCARE. Under Prospect’s ownership, hospital operations and balance sheets have suffered substantially, with $124 million in cumulative operating losses from fiscal 2020 to 2024, alongside $24 million in unpaid vendor bills in 2023 alone.

Prospect finally paid $17 million of its outstanding vendor bills, per court order, in July 2024. 

Advertisement

But Neronha believes that the financial set-asides required of Prospect and the newly created CharterCARE Health of Rhode Island, Inc. will prevent conditions from worsening, while reporting mandates will allow him to proactively file to put the hospitals into court-appointed receivership before any potential bankruptcy declarations arise.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending