Rhode Island
Major hurricane season predicted; insurers aren’t taking chances • Rhode Island Current
Unless a ton of climate and weather scientists are wrong, the U.S. could be in for the worst Atlantic hurricane season ever.
“This season is looking to be an extraordinary one,” said Rick Spinrad, administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Thursday morning at a briefing to announce NOAA’s predictions for the upcoming hurricane season, which starts on June 1 and runs through Nov. 30.
NOAA is predicting an 85% chance of an above-normal season, with 17 to 25 named storms, eight to 13 hurricanes and four to seven major hurricanes, which are those that have sustained winds of at least 111 mph — categories 3, 4 and 5.
“The forecast for named storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes is the highest NOAA has ever issued for the May outlook,” Spinrad said.
The forecast is in keeping with several earlier forecasts, including one issued by Colorado State University. Nearly two months ago, CSU predicted a very active season with 23 named storms, 11 to become hurricanes and five major hurricanes. It was the highest prediction for hurricanes that CSU has ever issued in its April outlook, which began in 1995.
Climate change is part of the culprit. It has caused unprecedented warmth in the oceans, which means there is more fuel for storms. Matthew Rosencrans, NOAA’s lead hurricane forecaster, said sea surface temperatures in the main storm development area are where they would normally be in August — that’s 2 to 3.5 Fahrenheit degrees above normal for this time of year. Another factor is the cyclical weather pattern known as La Niña, which is expected in late summer. It is conducive to more active hurricane seasons because its low wind shear conditions allow storms to stay intact. Forecasters are also seeing active African monsoons. The warm water just makes everything worse.
“It’s really the confluence of factors,” Rosencrans said.
It could be not a single storm hits land anywhere, nevermind this part of the Atlantic basin. But as the longstanding mantra goes, repeated multiple times during NOAA’s announcement: it only takes one. Witness 1992, predicted to be a very mild hurricane year. And indeed that was the case, with fewer than a handful of hurricanes. But one of them was Andrew. To this day it remains among the worst hurricanes to strike the U.S., devastating south Florida and parts of the Gulf coast.
As many in Connecticut’s shoreline communities have already discovered, or may discover soon, insurance companies are not taking chances. Homeowners insurance rates are increasing — by double digits year-over-year, in some cases. And what’s known as a “hurricane deductible,” once a rarity, is now close to ubiquitous.
To be clear, some of this is a result of the continuing COVID legacy of inflation and supply chain difficulties. Replacement costs for homes are just higher than they used to be. But a great deal, if not most of it, is a function of the massive payouts insurance companies have faced from natural disasters that are more frequent and extreme, courtesy of climate change. In the west, it’s wildfires. On the East and Gulf Coasts, it’s storms.
Understanding what an insurance company does or doesn’t cover, what Connecticut allows or requires it to cover, and the minefields that may be all over insurance policies can be nothing short impenetrable.
Here’s what to know:
Homeowners insurance is not flood insurance
If wind from a hurricane or any other kind of storm blows pieces of your house off or dumps a tree on your roof causing damage, homeowners insurance should cover it (at least after the deductible).
If rain from that same storm or hurricane floods and wrecks your ground floor, homeowners insurance will not cover it. You’d need flood insurance, which is required in many, but not all, cases.
On the other hand, if the tree that lands on your roof makes a big hole and rain comes pouring through the hole, that should be covered by homeowners insurance.
How a hurricane deductible works
Insurance policies typically have a deductible, which is the amount you have to pay off the top before insurance starts paying. It is typically a flat amount of money.
A hurricane deductible is the same in that it’s the amount you have to pay off the top, but it’s different in that the amount is a percentage of the value of the structure. So if your homeowners policy values your home at $500,000, a 5% hurricane deductible means you would have to pay $25,000 out of pocket before insurance would cover anything. A 2% deductible would mean you’d have to pay $10,000.
To be clear, the deductible is based on the value of the dwelling, not on the cost of the repair. If a hurricane wrecks your roof and the cost of repair is $20,000 and your deductible is $25,000, you’re going to have to pay for the whole thing.
The benefit of a hurricane deductible is that the overall cost of the insurance policy stays lower.
Hurricane deductibles can be used only in parts of Connecticut
Insurance is regulated by states, so the rules in Connecticut most likely will not be the same everywhere.
Hurricane deductibles are only allowed in coastal area communities — the 24 that border Long Island Sound, plus another nine that are close: North Branford, Orange, Essex, Deep River, Chester, Killingworth, North Stonington, Ledyard and Lyme.
For homes within 2,600 feet of the shoreline as the crow flies — that’s just about a half-mile — companies may impose a hurricane deductible up to 5%. Beyond that distance within those communities, they can only go up to 2%. In each case, they can go to a lower percentage but not a higher one.
In some policy renewal cases for homes more than 2,600 feet from the coast, the use of already-existing storm shutters or other mitigation such as impact-resistant glass can nullify a hurricane deductible requirement.
When can a hurricane deductible be activated?
In Connecticut, insurance companies may activate a hurricane deductible only if, during the time the National Hurricane Center has a hurricane warning in place anywhere in the state, through 24 hours after that warning is removed or downgraded, there is a sustained wind of more than 74 miles per hour anywhere in the state. (As defined by NOAA, sustained wind is an average of wind speed at a given location over a two-minute period.)
That statute was put in place after the confusion around Tropical Storm Irene in 2011 and Storm Sandy in 2012. Both storms had been downgraded by the time they reached Connecticut. The last storm to score a direct hit on Connecticut as a hurricane was Gloria in 1985.
Since it was clarified, the updated hurricane deductible policy has never been triggered.
Wind/hail deductibles
This is another product insurance companies are using in storm-prone areas to help them recoup losses. Like hurricane deductibles, they can help lower the cost of an insurance policy. But they do not need a trigger the way a hurricane deductible does. Nor are they capped at certain percentages.
“If you have a wind/hail deductible on your policy, it can be applied at any time; you don’t need a hurricane,” said George Bradner, assistant deputy commissioner and director of the property and casualty division at the Connecticut Insurance Department. “It’s important for consumers to understand that if they accept a wind/hail deductible in lieu of a hurricane deductible, anytime the wind blows, they could have that deductible apply.”
In the end, wind/hail deductibles could wind up costing homeowners more, given the prevalence of extreme storms in recent years. They are allowed in all parts of the state, but they cannot be mandated by insurance companies.
Gray areas remain
Take a storm like Sandy, which occurred in 2012. Scientifically, it was considered a post-tropical cyclone at the time it made landfall in New Jersey, even though it had maximum sustained winds that were hurricane force (80 mph). Therefore, the National Weather Service could not issue a hurricane warning. There was much debate afterward over whether that classification caused residents of New Jersey in particular to not take the storm as seriously as they should have. Sustained winds from Sandy did not meet hurricane criteria in Connecticut.
The National Hurricane Center, in an email response to how Sandy would be handled now, said: “The change made after Sandy is that the NWS can issue and maintain hurricane/tropical storm/storm surge watches and warnings for systems that are expected to transition from a tropical cyclone to a post-tropical cyclone near land.” For internal purposes, such a storm would still be considered a post-tropical cyclone. “But we can use watches and warnings to communicate wind and storm surge risks despite the classification.”
What would that mean for a hurricane deductible trigger? We don’t know.
“Each situation is going to have to be looked at and reviewed by the department,” Bradner said. “We’ll look at the statute, we’ll meet with our lawyers and with the commissioner and we’ll make a determination if a deductible can or cannot apply.”
NOAA also unveiled a new version of its well-known cone that shows on a map where a hurricane is likely to go. The new version, which is experimental for the upcoming season, will show more broadly where impacts from a hurricane might reach beyond the standard cone, and what those impacts might be. What might that eventually mean for a hurricane deductible trigger? We don’t know that either.
Minefields
Getting the correct information, knowing the terminology, checking the rules and being aware of what’s in an insurance policy can be among the most challenging parts of the process.
If your company has a hurricane deductible in place, it has to state that and the dollar amount prominently on your policy. But check if your company is considered “admitted” or not. Most of the roughly 140 insurance companies operating in the state are “admitted,” making them subject to insurance department regulations. The department has limited authority over non-admitted companies.
A company can’t refuse to renew someone or cancel them solely because they’ve had a catastrophe claim. A company can’t just decide to stop writing new policies.
However, companies can refuse to insure someone who’s had multiple claims. For people who can’t get homeowners insurance through the normal market and must have it — mainly people who have mortgages — the state has a bare-bones insurance program of last resort called the FAIR (Fair Access to Insurance Requirements) Plan. Within it there is a plan called the Coastal Market Assistance Program, or C-MAP, for coastal homeowners who have been unable to get insurance.
Some people who aren’t required to have insurance are simply going without.
“Which is insane,” said Eric George, president of the Insurance Association of Connecticut, an industry and lobbying group. “There are people who own their homes outright who do not have coverage. That’s where people are really rolling the dice, but a lot of people are doing that on the coastline because it’s just it’s too expensive.”
A company cannot mandate use of storm shutters or high-impact glass but can offer premium discounts for them.

When can a hurricane deductible be activated?
In Connecticut, insurance companies may activate a hurricane deductible only if, during the time the National Hurricane Center has a hurricane warning in place anywhere in the state, through 24 hours after that warning is removed or downgraded, there is a sustained wind of more than 74 miles per hour anywhere in the state. (As defined by NOAA, sustained wind is an average of wind speed at a given location over a two-minute period.)
That statute was put in place after the confusion around Tropical Storm Irene in 2011 and Storm Sandy in 2012. Both storms had been downgraded by the time they reached Connecticut. The last storm to score a direct hit on Connecticut as a hurricane was Gloria in 1985.
Since it was clarified, the updated hurricane deductible policy has never been triggered.
Wind/hail deductibles
This is another product insurance companies are using in storm-prone areas to help them recoup losses. Like hurricane deductibles, they can help lower the cost of an insurance policy. But they do not need a trigger the way a hurricane deductible does. Nor are they capped at certain percentages.
“If you have a wind/hail deductible on your policy, it can be applied at any time; you don’t need a hurricane,” said George Bradner, assistant deputy commissioner and director of the property and casualty division at the Connecticut Insurance Department. “It’s important for consumers to understand that if they accept a wind/hail deductible in lieu of a hurricane deductible, anytime the wind blows, they could have that deductible apply.”
In the end, wind/hail deductibles could wind up costing homeowners more, given the prevalence of extreme storms in recent years. They are allowed in all parts of the state, but they cannot be mandated by insurance companies.
Gray areas remain
Take a storm like Sandy, which occurred in 2012. Scientifically, it was considered a post-tropical cyclone at the time it made landfall in New Jersey, even though it had maximum sustained winds that were hurricane force (80 mph). Therefore, the National Weather Service could not issue a hurricane warning. There was much debate afterward over whether that classification caused residents of New Jersey in particular to not take the storm as seriously as they should have. Sustained winds from Sandy did not meet hurricane criteria in Connecticut.
The National Hurricane Center, in an email response to how Sandy would be handled now, said: “The change made after Sandy is that the NWS can issue and maintain hurricane/tropical storm/storm surge watches and warnings for systems that are expected to transition from a tropical cyclone to a post-tropical cyclone near land.” For internal purposes, such a storm would still be considered a post-tropical cyclone. “But we can use watches and warnings to communicate wind and storm surge risks despite the classification.”
What would that mean for a hurricane deductible trigger? We don’t know.
“Each situation is going to have to be looked at and reviewed by the department,” Bradner said. “We’ll look at the statute, we’ll meet with our lawyers and with the commissioner and we’ll make a determination if a deductible can or cannot apply.”
NOAA also unveiled a new version of its well-known cone that shows on a map where a hurricane is likely to go. The new version, which is experimental for the upcoming season, will show more broadly where impacts from a hurricane might reach beyond the standard cone, and what those impacts might be. What might that eventually mean for a hurricane deductible trigger? We don’t know that either.
Legislature did not take up climate resiliency bill
SB11 was a big resiliency bill from the governor that would have initiated many processes to help homeowners, businesses and municipalities better cope with climate change impacts.
Among other provisions, it would have allowed municipalities to establish financing programs for climate change resiliency and mitigation projects; required zoning regulation changes to deal with many climate change impacts; and would have required the state insurance commissioner to create a working group to look at homeowner and small business needs for dealing with losses from climate change-driven and other natural disasters.
It never made it to the floor.
“We did miss an opportunity,” said Joanna Wozniak-Brown, climate and infrastructure policy development coordinator at the Office of Policy and Management.
Would it have resulted in lower insurance rates? Maybe not. But better resiliency measures could lower the need for repairs, and in doing that, reduce the cost. And who knows, perhaps down the road certain resiliency measures could result in premium reductions similar to the way home elevations in flood zones can lower flood insurance costs.
Wozniak-Brown said that the bill was designed to address resilience across a broad spectrum of impacts — economic development, housing and public health, in addition to the physical resilience.
“SB 11 really was a systematic change that would have would have addressed the multitude of these issues,” she said. “Holistic is preferred over incremental; however, inaction could be deadly.
“I hope that we get another chance at it.”
In the meantime, a financing program to help homeowners pay for climate and resiliency projects like the kind SB11 envisioned is about to be unveiled by the Green Bank. It is part of the bank’s expansion into environmental infrastructure projects that the legislature approved in 2021. Homeowners will be able to get loans for things like storm shutters and high-impact glass, as well as flood resilience work.
Dramatic investments
A bigger potential — and one Connecticut has not wrestled with much — is whether and how to look beyond more traditional financing and insurance programs for dealing with climate change.
Carolyn Kousky, associate vice president for economics and policy at the Environmental Defense Fund and a well-known expert on climate risk management, wrote recently in an article on Earth.org: “Our insurance markets to protect people from climate-related disasters are breaking at the moment we need them the most.”
She said that’s especially acute in situations like hurricanes, in which many people face catastrophic losses at once and which threaten insurers’ solvency or even existence.
“The only long-term path to stabilizing insurance markets is dramatic investments in lowering our risk,” Kousky told the CT Mirror in an email message. “That means investments in protective infrastructure — green and gray, stronger building codes, and climate-aware land use planning.”
Green infrastructure refers to interventions that mimic natural systems like bioswales and porous surfaces; grey includes more conventional solutions like drainage pipes.
Among her suggestions is that insurers put some financial skin in the game.
“I think it is imperative that we also rebuild after disasters to much stronger standards. Insurers should support this,” she told the CT Mirror.
A program she and others point to is Strengthen Alabama Homes. It provides up to $10,000 in grants to strengthen roofs to specific standards that, in turn, will lower insurance premiums for those homeowners. The grant funding comes from increased licensing fees for insurers operating in Alabama.
“We want to try to do something like that here in Connecticut,” the Insurance Department’s Bradner said. “I think the whole fortification and building resilience is critical. And it’s going to be important, because it’s going to help minimize loss and claims that are being paid, and that’s going to help us keep companies in the state.”
Steven Rothstein, managing director of the accelerator for sustainable capital markets at Ceres, a Boston-based advocacy group that works towards the transition to a more sustainable economy, likes the Alabama model. He also points to the idea of what’s known as a parametric insurance, in which there are pre-set metrics such as the amount of rain or wind speeds. They trigger automatic — and usually much faster — payouts. It’s not widely used but has been effective in low-income areas and developing countries.
“This is not just an insurance industry issue. It is societal,” he said. He also pointed to the fundamental disconnect of using a yearly product, which is how insurance operates, to deal with a long-term problem.
“This is a complex problem,” he said. “H.L. Mencken once said, ‘for every complex problem there is a simple answer, and it’s always wrong.’ There’s no one answer.”
Connecticut Mirror is a content partner of States Newsroom. Read the original version here.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Rhode Island
A new safety role at Rhode Island College comes into sharper focus after Brown shooting – The Boston Globe
Lawrence was recently named RIC’s first emergency management director, a role college leaders had been planning before the December mass shooting across town at Brown University, but which took on new urgency after the tragedy.
Few resumes are better suited to the job.
A 20-year career in the New York Police Department. Commanding officer of the NYPD’s Employee Assistance Unit. A master’s degree from Harvard.
Lawrence got to Rhode Island the way a lot of people do: through someone who grew up here and never really left, at least not in spirit. Her husband, Brooke Lawrence, grew up in West Greenwich, and is director of the town’s emergency management agency.
“I couldn’t imagine retiring in my 40s,” Lawrence told me. “And I couldn’t imagine not giving back to my community.”
Public service has been part of Lawrence’s life for as long as she can remember. A New Jersey native, she dreamed of following in the footsteps of her mentor, a longtime FBI agent. She graduated from Monmouth University and earned a master’s degree in forensic psychology from John Jay College in 2001, shortly before the Sept. 11 attacks.
There was high demand for police in New York at the time, so Lawrence raised her hand to serve. She worked her way up the ranks from patrol to lieutenant, eventually taking charge of the department’s Employee Assistance Unit, a peer support program that helps rank-and-file officers navigate the most traumatic parts of the job. She later earned a second master’s degree from Harvard’s Kennedy School.
“It’s making sure our officers are getting through their career in the same mental capacity as they came on the job,” Lawrence said.
There’s a version of Lawrence’s new job that feels routine, especially at a quiet commuter campus like Rhode Island College. And when Lawrence was initially hired part-time last fall, it probably was.
Then the shooting at Brown University changed the stakes almost overnight.
On Dec. 13, Claudio Manuel Neves Valente, a Portuguese national and one-time student at Brown, opened fire inside the Barus and Holley building, killing two students and injuring nine others. Neves Valente also killed an MIT professor before he was found dead in a New Hampshire storage unit of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.
In eerie videos recorded in the storage unit, Neves Valente admitted that he stalked the Brown campus for weeks prior to his attack. He largely went unnoticed by campus security, which led the university’s police chief to be placed on leave and essentially replaced by former Providence Police Chief Colonel Hugh Clements.
Lawrence assisted with the response at Brown. She leads the trauma response team for the Rhode Island Behavioral Health Medical Reserve Corps, which staffed the family reunification center in the hours after the shooting.
RIC’s campus is more enclosed than Brown’s — there are only two major entryways to the college — but there are unique challenges.
For one, it’s technically located in both Providence and North Providence, which requires coordination between multiple public safety departments in both communities.
More specifically, Lawrence noted that every building on campus has the same address, which can present a challenge in an emergency. Lawrence has worked with RIC leadership and local public safety to assign an address to each building.
Lawrence stressed that she doesn’t want RIC to overreact to the tragedy at Brown, and she said campus leaders are committed to keeping the tight-knit community intact.
But she admits that the shooting remains top of mind.
“Every campus community sees what happened at Brown and says ‘please don’t let that happen to us,’” Lawrence said.
Lawrence said everyone at RIC feels a deep sense of responsibility to keep students safe during their time on campus.
And she already feels right at home.
“I want to come home from work every day and feel like I made a difference,” she said.
Dan McGowan can be reached at dan.mcgowan@globe.com. Follow him @danmcgowan.
Rhode Island
Taylor Swift And Travis Kelce Tying The Knot In RI? Online Casino Doesn’t Think So
If you thought the smart money was on pop icon Taylor Swift and gridiron star Travis Kelce tying the knot in Rhode Island, an online crypto casino and sportsbook is here to tell you you’re wrong.
The Ocean State was the second favorite at +155 and 39.22%, and Pennsylvania and Ohio were together at a distant third at +1,600 and 5.88%.
Tennessee was the fifth choice at +2,000 and 4.76%.
“New York is the favourite because it’s the city most closely tied to Taylor Swift’s public life, with multiple residences, strong emotional branding, and world‑class venues that offer privacy and security for a high‑profile event,” an unidentified spokesperson said in a media release.
Human Remains Found Near Taylor Swift’s Mansion Identified: Report
Rhode Island
Rent control won’t solve Providence’s steep rental prices – The Boston Globe
Part of the story is the pandemic-era shift toward smaller cities. But the larger truth is Providence has not built enough housing to keep up with demand. In 2024, Rhode Island ranked 50th in the nation for new housing permits – dead last. That isn’t ideology; it is economics.
As housing experts have said, including HousingWorksRI Executive Director Brenda Clement, we have a basic supply-and-demand problem. Expanding housing supply for everyone should be the focus.
To its credit, Providence has begun to move. Recent efforts by Mayor Brett Smiley, the City Council, nonprofit partners, and private developers have created hundreds of new units. More are in the pipeline. That progress must continue.
As rents rise, pressure for immediate relief has grown. The City Council’s proposed solution is rent control: a cap on annual rent increases at 4 percent. In practice, it fails to solve the underlying problem, and creates new ones.
First, rent control does not make today’s rent affordable, it only limits future increases by creating a cap. Many landlords will raise rents to the cap each year. A $2,000 apartment under a 4 percent cap becomes $2,433 after five years – an increase that renters still feel acutely. That is basic compounding, not a worst-case scenario.
Second, rent control would create a hole in Providence’s budget, as it reduces the taxable value of properties. The Smiley administration examined rent-controlled cities and applied the outcomes to Providence’s tax base. The projected annual revenue loss ranges from $10.3 million to $17.5 million.
When rental property values decline, cities are left with two choices: raise taxes or cut services. Education funding, park improvements, library funding, and basic infrastructure all come under pressure. Experience elsewhere shows this burden does not fall on landlords; it shifts to single-family homeowners. Portland, Maine, saw a 5.4 percent reduction in its tax base after rent control, forcing these tradeoffs. The implementation of rent control will affect all Providence residents, whether they rent or own.
Third, rent control discourages new housing production, the opposite of what Providence needs. Developers are less likely to build in cities where future revenue is capped, financing is harder, and long-term costs are unpredictable. St. Paul, Minnesota, offers a cautionary tale. After voters approved a strict rent cap in 2021, new unit creation dropped by more than 84 percent in the first quarter, forcing city leaders to exempt new construction, which is exempt in the Providence City Council rent control proposal.
When we build more housing at all price points, market pressure eases, as supply catches up with demand.
That does not mean ignoring the pain people feel today. I grew up here, attended our public schools, and bought a modest single-family home in the neighborhood where I was raised. I feel today’s housing pressures firsthand and hear them daily from family and neighbors. After 12 years on the council, including a leadership role in 2011 when Providence was on the brink of bankruptcy, I know our elected officials genuinely want workable solutions.
That is why, as executive director of The Providence Foundation, an organization of 140 private business and nonprofit members from myriad industries, I recommended we commission a study by the Rhode Island Public Expenditure Council to educate the public on this issue and identify solutions. The report revealed the most effective approach to housing shortages and high costs pairs aggressive housing production with targeted rental assistance for households most at risk of displacement.
Cities across the country have shown what works: modernized zoning, faster permitting, conversion of underused commercial space, and temporary rental assistance to help families stay housed while new supply comes online. These strategies outperform rent control. Overcoming the housing challenge will require all levels of government to play a role.
Reasoned policy will meet Providence’s housing needs and strengthen our economy for a brighter tomorrow.
David Salvatore is the executive director of The Providence Foundation, a nonprofit organization committed to supporting visionary projects downtown, and a former Providence City Council president and member.
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoDrummer Brian Pastoria, longtime Detroit music advocate, dies at 68
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago‘Youth’ Twitter review: Ken Karunaas impresses audiences; Suraj Venjaramoodu adds charm; music wins praise | – The Times of India
-
Sports6 days agoIOC addresses execution of 19-year-old Iranian wrestler Saleh Mohammadi
-
New Mexico5 days agoClovis shooting leaves one dead, four injured
-
Business1 week agoDisney’s new CEO says his focus is on storytelling and creativity
-
Technology5 days agoYouTube job scam text: How to spot it fast
-
Tennessee4 days agoTennessee Police Investigating Alleged Assault Involving ‘Reacher’ Star Alan Ritchson
-
Texas1 week agoHow to buy Houston vs. Texas A&M 2026 March Madness tickets

