Massachusetts
Will Marblehead, Beverly teacher strikes end tonight?
Students in Gloucester, Massachusetts, will be back in class Monday, but contract negotiations continue in Beverly and Marblehead.
The deadline is imminent for teachers and their school committees to reach an agreement that will see students return to school to start the week. If they fail to finally put an end to this strike, a third party will take over talks.
Since teacher strikes are illegal in Massachusetts, unions in both of those North Shore communities are facing tens of thousands of dollars in fines.
An Essex Superior Court judge agreed to waive those fines Friday if an agreement could be reached by 6 p.m. Sunday. Otherwise, both districts will begin the Department of Labor’s fact-finding process. That’s the next step when a state mediator can’t help both sides come to an agreement on a contract.
Teachers say that takes longer, and students could miss an additional four to six days of school.
The Marblehead Education Association bargaining team said Sunday evening that it is continuing to work on reaching an agreement on a new contract with the school committee, noting that the two parties have been exchanging proposals throughout the day.
The MEA said while it is committed to reaching an agreement that can reopen Marblehead Public Schools Monday, a settlement could not be reached by 6 p.m., per the court order issued Thursday.
“The MEA continues to demand that the School Committee end its pursuit of legal charges against individual educators related to the strike,” a statement read. “The MEA furthermore stresses the importance of reaching an agreement on return-to-work provisions that ensure no educators will be subject to retaliation for participating in the strike.”
In Beverly, the chair of the school committee said for two days they have had “an improved, serious and fair offer on the table” for teachers and paraprofessionals that includes “significant wage increases and paid family leave.”
Rachael Abell said she believes that the only way to achieve a solution at this point is through face-to-face discussion between school committee leaders and Beverly Teachers Association co-presidents Julia Brotherton and Andrea Sherman.
Abell later said BTA leadership had accepted their offer at 5 p.m. to meet in person to try to break the impasse and reach an agreement to end the strike, adding that she was encouraged by this step and that the two sides are exchanging new ideas and are in active discussions.
“As a show of further good faith,” the school committee agreed to continue negotiations and wait a bit longer to call school for Monday.
“If we do not have a tentative agreement soon, we will unfortunately be forced to call school for tomorrow and will decide then whether to continue with mediation,” Abell said. “If significant progress is not made soon, the School Committee intends to abide by the court order, end mediation and begin the state fact-finding process immediately.”
In a brief update around 7:30 p.m., Brotherton and Sherman, co-presidents of the BTA, said they had just sent some counterproposals over to management.
“We’re really hoping that those counterproposals will get the job done and that we can open schools tomorrow and be back at work with our students,” Brotherton said.
She noted that the proposal that the BTA has on the table right now costs $1 million less than the proposal that management has given them, but a sticking point appears to be that “management doesn’t seem to want to pay paraprofessionals a living wage and we are committed to that.”
“We can be here all night and we’d like to be,” Sherman said of ongoing bargaining. “Our number one goal is to be back in school as soon as possible, so we will stay until the deal is done if they will stay.”
Students in Gloucester will be back in school Monday after educators were on strike for two weeks; strikes continue in Beverly and Marblehead.
The strikes have kept thousands of students across the three communities north of Boston at home and will force schools to hold classes during vacations and weekends to meet the required 180 days of classroom learning required by state law — a situation that any snow days could make worse.
Gov. Maura Healey Saturday called it “unacceptable” that students have missed over two weeks of school.
“It’s hurting our young people, parents and families above all else. Students need to be back in school on Monday,” the governor said. “I have spoken to all parties, and I believe they are at a place where they should be able to reach an agreement this weekend, and they should do so. If they don’t reach that agreement, they should ensure that students can return to the classroom on Monday while these negotiations continue.”
Healey reiterated that the parties must continue to negotiate throughout the weekend, saying that she and the lieutenant governor have been and will continue to request updates.
“Our young people need to be back in school,” she said.
An Essex County Superior Court judge said there would be no fines Friday if teachers end their strikes by Sunday evening.
Follow NBC10 Boston:
https://instagram.com/nbc10boston
https://tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
https://facebook.com/NBC10Boston
Tweets by NBC10Boston
Both sides in both towns have continuously pointed fingers at one another, while families and students are caught in the middle. Parents organized a candlelight vigil in support of teachers in Beverly Sunday evening.
Kimberley Coelho, a member of the Beverly School Committee, spoke out on social media Saturday saying some of her own colleagues seem more focused on breaking the teachers spirits than finding common ground.
In her Facebook post, Coelho called the process “disgusting,” saying in part, “What is abundantly clear is some do not want to settle a contract. Instead, feel more concerned about breaking the union’s spirits and dividing our community. I feel the legal advice of our counsel is wrong and only delays reopening schools.”
We have not yet heard of any deal being reached in either town. We are expecting to hear from officials Sunday night.
Massachusetts
Mass. State Police suspend trooper without pay over sexual misconduct allegation
Massachusetts State Police suspended a trooper without pay on Thursday after learning about a sexual misconduct allegation against him, according to state police.
It is unclear what exactly the accusations against Trooper Terence Kent entail or when the sexual misconduct is alleged to have happened, but a statement from a state police spokesperson indicates that it happened in Lexington. The alleged incident took place during a traffic stop, according to The Boston Globe.
Lexington police and the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office are conducting an independent investigation into the allegations, state police said. The state police department is “committed” to cooperating with the investigation into Kent and has opened an internal affairs investigation related to the sexual misconduct allegations.
Massachusetts
Massachusetts juveniles get first misdemeanor case dismissed, SJC rules
“Once the jury determined that the juvenile had engaged only in minor misdemeanor conduct and it was undisputed that this was the juvenile’s first minor misdemeanor offense, the court no longer retained jurisdiction,” Justice Scott Kafker wrote.
Originally Published:
Massachusetts
In Mass. towns where cost of living outpaced income, Trump saw more gains, data show – The Boston Globe
In Berkshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties, the average household earns about 70 percent of what MIT estimates is necessary to meet the current cost of living for a home with two working adults and one child. In those counties, Trump’s share of votes in the 2024 election saw an up to 5 percentage point increase as compared with the 2020 election’s numbers.
The rightward swings are more pronounced when looking at cities within those counties. In Springfield, for example, Trump saw a 7 percentage point increase. The median household income in the city is 50 percent of the required annual income to cover the cost of living, based on the MIT estimate.
James Dupuis, a retired Air Force reservist and commercial truck driver, is one of those Springfield Trump voters. Dupuis and his wife live with their daughter, her boyfriend, and grandchild in an effort to help the young family save enough to move to their own place amid spiking rent prices.
“They’re struggling paycheck to paycheck. I mean, my wife and I are helping out the best we can with all the kids, but it’s tough,” Dupuis said.
Those same economic concerns were echoed across Eastern Massachusetts, where even Boston saw a sizeable increase in Trump votes. Fall River for the first time in nearly 100 years swung majority Republican in the presidential race.
In counties where residents are financially better off and where the median household income has kept pace with the living wage estimates, Trump gained no more than 3 percentage points. Trump lost vote share in only 11 towns across Massachusetts.
Theodoridis said four years ago, many voters reacted to the COVID-19 pandemic and civil unrest in a similar fashion, and voted against the Republican incumbent.
“[In 2020] Trump lost, sort of, a mirror image of this election,” Theodoridis said.
This, coupled with rising tensions over immigration in Massachusetts and other states, paints a fuller picture of voters this election.
To Shari Ariail of Danvers, the election proved that “Democrats [are] out of touch with the nation.”
Ariail, who voted Democrat this year but identifies as an independent, was surprised when she saw Trump flags popping up around town. The median household income in Danvers is roughly $117,000, north of the state’s $96,000 for 2022. Still, Trump’s share of votes there also increased this election, from 39 percent in 2020 to 44 percent this year.
In many ways, economists say the country’s economy is doing well: Unemployment numbers have largely returned to pre-pandemic levels, wages are higher now than they were under the previous Trump administration, and inflation has finally come down after peaking at 8 percent in the earlier years of the pandemic.
Still, many voters have said they haven’t felt those improvements in their wallets.
“Material concerns, broadly speaking, are going to drive people more than [moral or social] concerns,” Theodoridis said. “But we don’t really know exactly what the limits are, and this election gives us a pretty good sense.”
This story was produced by the Globe’s Money, Power, Inequality team, which covers the racial wealth gap in Greater Boston. You can sign up for the newsletter here.
Esmy Jimenez can be reached at esmy.jimenez@globe.com. Follow her @esmyjimenez. Vince can be reached at vince.dixon@globe.com. Follow him @vince_dixon_.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science5 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics7 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology6 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World7 days ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
News7 days ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
News7 days ago
Gaetz-gate: Navigating the President-elect's most baffling Cabinet pick