Connect with us

Maine

Everything to consider when buying a home in Maine’s metro areas

Published

on

Everything to consider when buying a home in Maine’s metro areas


The BDN is exploring Maine’s housing disaster from each doable angle, from the way it impacts residence costs, to what it means for Mainers throughout the state. Learn our ongoing protection right here and fill out this manner to inform us what you need to know.

Extra folks than ever wish to purchase a house in Maine. Whether or not you’re from out of state or trying to transfer inside Maine, there are a number of issues you possibly can have a look at earlier than selecting the place to reside.

Most Mainers reside in certainly one of 4 metropolitan and micropolitan areas throughout the state: the Augusta-Waterville micropolitan space, Bangor metro, Lewiston-Auburn metro and the Portland-South Portland metro. We checked out how every of them ranks on varied metrics.

Housing Value

Most Costly Housing Prices: Portland

Advertisement

Least Costly Housing Prices: Bangor

Monetary concerns are sometimes the main traits of homebuying, and the completely different areas of Maine range considerably.

It’s no secret that purchasing a house within the Portland space is not any simple activity. Though the housing market seems to be cooling statewide, the provision remains to be low and demand excessive in and round Portland. These components add as much as make it by far the most costly place in Maine to purchase a house. The median home is valued at over $466,000, in accordance with Zillow information for April.

That’s virtually $200,000 greater than the subsequent most costly space, Lewiston-Auburn, the place the median house is value $285,000.

The Augusta-Waterville metro’s median house is value $264,000. A house within the Augusta space was cheaper than within the Bangor metro at first of 2000 however that’s modified. Houses close to the state capital have by no means been pricier than right this moment.

Advertisement

Houses within the Bangor metro space are the most cost effective at a median worth of $235,000, with some particularly low cost locations nearer to Aroostook County.

Inhabitants/Density

Most Populous: Portland

Least Populous: Lewiston-Auburn

Most Densely-Populated: Portland

Least Densely-Populated: Bangor

Advertisement

The Portland metro has the most individuals, with 552,000 as of 2020, in accordance with U.S. Census information. That’s way over the opposite three areas mixed and accounts for over 40 p.c of the state’s inhabitants.

Match inside 2,100 sq. miles, that makes it probably the most densely populated metro or micro space in Maine with 265 folks per sq. mile. Although considerably smaller than close by metros like Boston and New York Metropolis, it stays the perfect place for somebody who needs the hustle and bustle of metropolis life inside Maine

Although the least populous of the 4 areas, the Lewiston metro is just not far off with its 111,000 folks, with a density of 237 folks per sq. mile. Augusta follows with its inhabitants of 124,000, or 143 folks per sq. mile.

Bangor is by far the least dense at simply 45 folks per sq. mile, making it six occasions much less dense than the Portland space. Although it has 152,000 folks, greater than the Lewiston and Augusta metro and micro areas, the Bangor metro is a big 3,400 sq. miles.

Not like the Portland metro space, there’s a substantial part of land close to Bangor that’s primarily undeveloped, together with Penobscot County’s huge unorganized territories. The Bangor space is the very best guess for a household that desires entry to a reasonably rural group whereas gaining access to a major Maine service heart in Bangor.

Advertisement

Financial Alternative

Highest Median Family Revenue: Portland

Lowest Median Family Revenue: Bangor

Portland is the financial capital of Maine, and it’s unmatched when it comes to financial alternative. The Portland metro has by far the best median family revenue of $73,000 and the bottom poverty charge of 8.1 p.c. Typical incomes within the metropolis of Portland itself are greater than $10,000 decrease than throughout the Portland metro space, in accordance to 2020 American Group Survey information.

Median family incomes within the state’s three different metro and micropolitan areas are pretty related at $55,400 in Augusta-Waterville, $55,000 in Lewiston-Auburn and $52,000 in Bangor. Although Bangor’s is the bottom, there are nonetheless quite a few high-paying jobs with quite a few profitable blue-collar and white-collar professionals throughout the metro space.

Crime

Most violent crime per capita: Lewiston-Auburn

Advertisement

Least violent crime per capita: Bangor

Everybody needs to reside in a spot that’s secure, and it’s a consideration that can undoubtedly go into the place one chooses to reside.

Nationwide reviews have typically estimated that Maine is likely one of the most secure states within the nation, and it’s generally given the moniker of “most secure state within the U.S.” However there are sections that see larger instances of crimes in comparison with others.

The Bangor metro has by far the bottom charge of violent crime for any metro or micro space within the state, in accordance with FBI statistics from 2019 for a number of communities in every metro – the latest numbers available by municipality. Its charge of 6.9 violent crimes per 10,000 folks was practically half of Portland’s charge of 13.8 and fewer than one-third of Lewison’s 21.8 charge. Augusta’s charge was 17.8 per 10,000, above Portland’s however beneath Lewiston’s.

Different crimes can rely extra on the group. For instance, property crimes had been commonest in Bangor whereas Portland had a barely larger charge of aggravated assault than Augusta.

Advertisement

Value of Residing

Highest value of residing: Portland

Lowest value of residing: Augusta-Waterville 

Of the 4 main cities making up the metro and micro areas, Portland has by far the best value of residing, in accordance with BestPlaces.web, which tracks the price of residing for communities throughout the USA. That statistic contains the price of groceries, well being care, housing, utilities and transportation.

Portland is the one one of many 4 metro hubs that has a value of residing larger than the nationwide common, by 8 p.c. The following-highest value of residing was town of Lewiston, though it’s 15 p.c beneath the nationwide common, adopted by Bangor at 17 p.c beneath and Augusta at 19 p.c beneath.

Portland had the priciest groceries, Lewiston the priciest transportation and Bangor the most costly utilities and well being care.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen

Published

on

Maine’s marine resources chief has profane exchange with lobstermen


Maine Department of Marine Resources Commissioner Patrick Keliher said “f— you” to a man during a Thursday meeting at which fishermen assailed him for a state plan to raise the size limit for lobster.

The heated exchange came on the same day that Keliher withdrew the proposal, which came in response to limits from regional regulators concerned with data showing a 35 percent decrease in lobster population in the state’s biggest fishing area.

It comes on the heels of fights between the storied fishery and the federal government over proposed restrictions on fishing gear that are intended to preserve the population of endangered whales off the East Coast. It was alleviated by a six-year pause on new whale rules negotiated in 2022 by Gov. Janet Mills and the state’s congressional delegation.

“I think this is the right thing to do because the future of the industry is at stake for a lot of different reasons,” Keliher told the fishermen of his now-withdrawn change at a meeting in Augusta on Thursday evening, according to a video posted on Facebook.

Advertisement

After crosstalk from the crowd, Keliher implored them to listen to him. Then, a man yelled that they don’t have to listen to him because the commission “sold out” to federal regulators and Canada.

“F— you, I sold out,” Keliher yelled, prompting an angry response from the fishermen.

“That’s nice. Foul language in the meeting. Good for you. That’s our commissioner,” a man shouted back.

Keliher apologized to the crowd shortly after making the remark and will try to talk with the man he directed the profanity to, department spokesperson Jeff Nichols said. The commissioner issued a Friday statement saying the remarks came as a result of his passion for the industry and criticisms of his motives that he deemed unfair, he said.

“I remain dedicated to working in support of this industry and will continue to strengthen the relationships and build the trust necessary to address the difficult and complex tasks that lay ahead,” Keliher said.

Advertisement

Spokespeople for Gov. Janet Mills did not immediately respond to a request for comment on whether she has spoken to Keliher about his remarks.

Lobstermen pushed back in recent meetings against the state’s plan, challenging the underlying data. Now, fishermen can keep lobsters that measure 3.25 inches from eye socket to tail. The proposal would have raised that limit by 1/16 of an inch and would have been the first time the limit was raised in decades.

The department pulled the limit pending a new stock survey, a move that U.S. Rep. Jared Golden, a Democrat from Maine’s 2nd District, hailed in a news release that called the initial proposal “an unnecessary overreaction to questionable stock data.”

Keliher is Maine’s longest-serving commissioner. He has held his job since former Gov. Paul LePage hired him in 2012. Mills, a Democrat, reappointed the Gardiner native after she took office in 2019. Before that, he was a hunting guide, charter boat captain and ran the Coastal Conservation Association of Maine and the Maine Atlantic Salmon Commission.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters

Published

on

Opinion: Voter ID referendum is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters


The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com

Anna Kellar is the executive director of the League of Women Voters of Maine.

This past November, my 98-year-old grandmother was determined that she wasn’t going to miss out on voting for president. She was worried that her ballot wouldn’t arrive in the mail in time. Fortunately, her daughter — my aunt — was able to pick up a ballot for her, bring it to her to fill out, and then return it to the municipal office.

Thousands of Maine people, including elderly and disabled people like my grandmother, rely on third-party ballot delivery to be able to vote. What they don’t know is that a referendum heading to voters this year wants to take away that ability and install other barriers to our constitutional right to vote.

Advertisement

The “Voter ID for Maine” citizen’s initiative campaign delivered their signatures to the Secretary of State this week, solidifying the prospect of a November referendum. The League of Women Voters of Maine (LWVME) opposes this ballot initiative. We know it is a form of voter suppression.

The voter ID requirement proposed by this campaign would be one of the most restrictive anywhere in the county. It would require photo ID to vote and to vote absentee, and it would exclude a number of currently accepted IDs.

But that’s not all. The legislation behind the referendum is also an attack on absentee voting. It will repeal ongoing absentee voting, where a voter can sign up to have an absentee ballot mailed to them automatically for each election cycle, and it limits the use and number of absentee ballot dropboxes to the point where some towns may find it impractical to offer them. It makes it impossible for voters to request an absentee ballot over the phone. It prevents an authorized third party from delivering an absentee ballot, a service that many elderly and disabled Mainers rely on.

Absentee voting is safe and secure and a popular way to vote for many Mainers. We should be looking for ways to make it more convenient for Maine voters to cast their ballots, not putting obstacles in their way.

Make no mistake: This campaign is a broad attack on voting rights that, if implemented, would disenfranchise many Maine people. It’s disappointing to see Mainers try to impose these barriers on their fellow Mainers’ right to vote when this state is justly proud of its high voter participation rates. These restrictions can and will harm every type of voter, with senior and rural voters experiencing the worst of the disenfranchisement. It will be costly, too. Taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for a new system that is unnecessary, expensive, and harmful to Maine voters.

Advertisement

All of the evidence suggests that voter IDs don’t prevent voter fraud. Maine has safeguards in place to prevent fraud, cyber attacks, and other kinds of foul play that would attempt to subvert our elections. This proposal is being imported to Maine from an out-of-state playbook (see the latest Ohio voter suppression law) that just doesn’t fit Maine. The “Voter ID for Maine” campaign will likely mislead Mainers into thinking that requiring an ID isn’t a big deal, but it will have immediate impacts on eligible voters. Unfortunately, that may be the whole point, and that’s what the proponents of this measure will likely refuse to admit.

This is not a well-intentioned nonpartisan effort. And we should call this campaign what it is: a broad attack on voting rights in order to suppress voters.

Maine has strong voting rights. We are a leader in the nation. Our small, rural, working-class state has one of the highest voter turnout rates in the country. That’s something to be proud of. We rank this high because of our secure elections, same-day voter registration, no-excuse absentee ballots, and no photo ID laws required to vote. Let’s keep it this way and oppose this voter suppression initiative.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Published

on

Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection


Maine Democratic Party leader won’t seek reelection

Bev Uhlenhake Maine Democratic Party

The chair of the Maine Democratic Party announced Thursday she won’t seek reelection when members select leaders later this month.

Bev Uhlenhake, a former city councilor and mayor in Brewer and former chair of the Penobscot County Democrats, has served as chair of the state party since January 2023. She is also a previous vice chair of the party.

In a written statement, Uhlenhake noted some of the recent successes and challenges facing Democrats, including the reelection of Democratic majorities in both the Maine House and Senate last November, though by narrower margins, and winning three of Maine’s four electoral votes for Vice President Kamala Harris.

Advertisement

“While we have laid a solid foundation from which Maine Democrats can build toward even greater success in 2026 and beyond, I have decided to step away from Maine Democratic Party leadership for personal and professional reasons, and will not seek reelection,” Uhlenhake said.

Party Vice Chair Julian Rogers, who was also elected to his post in 2023, announced he also won’t seek reelection to leadership, but will resume a previous role he held as vice chair of the party’s committee on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Belonging.

Democratic State Committee members will vote for the party’s next leaders in elections to be held on Sunday, Jan. 26.

« Previous

South Portland debates natural vs. artificial grass at planned athletic facility



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending