Connecticut
Opinion: Connecticut must plan for Medicaid cuts
Three hours and nine minutes. That’s how long the average Connecticut resident spends in the emergency department at any one visit. With cuts in Medicaid, that time will only get longer.
On July 4, 2025, President Donald Trump passed the Big Beautiful Bill, which includes major cuts to Medicaid funding. Out of nearly 926,700 CT residents who receive Medicaid, these cuts could remove coverage for up to 170,000 people, many of whom are children, seniors, people with disabilities, and working families already living paycheck-to-paycheck.
This is not a small policy change, but rather a shift with life-altering consequences.
When people lose their only form of health insurance, they don’t stop needing medical care. They simply delay it. They wait until the infection spreads, the chest pain worsens, or the depression deepens. This is not out of choice, but because their immediate needs come first. Preventable conditions worsen, and what could have been treated quickly and affordably in a primary care office becomes an emergency medical crisis.
That crisis typically lands in the emergency department: the single part of the healthcare system that is legally required to treat everyone, insured or not. However, ER care is the most expensive, least efficient form of healthcare. More ER use means longer wait times, more hospital crowding, and more delayed care for everyone. No one, not even those who can afford private insurance, is insulated from the consequence.
Not only are individual people impacted, but hospitals too. Medicaid provides significant reimbursements to hospitals and health systems like Yale New Haven and Hartford Healthcare, as well as smaller hospitals that serve rural and low-income regions. Connecticut’s hospitals are already strained and cuts will further threaten their operating budget, potentially leading to cuts in staffing, services, or both.
Vicky WangWhen there’s fewer staff in already short-staffed departments and fewer services, care becomes less available to those who need it the most.
This trend is not hypothetical. It is already happening. This past summer, when I had to schedule an appointment with my primary care practitioner, I was told that the earliest availability was in three months. When I called on September 5 for a specialty appointment at Yale New Haven, the first available date was September 9, 2026. If this is the system before thc cuts, what will it look like after?
The burden will fall heaviest on communities that already face obstacles to care: low-income residents, rural towns with limited providers, and Black and Latino families who are disproportionately insured through Medicaid. These cuts will deepen, not close, Connecticut’s health disparities.
This is not just a public health issue, but also an economic one. Preventative care is significantly cheaper than emergency care. When residents cannot access affordable healthcare, the long-term costs shift to hospitals, taxpayers, and private insurance premiums. The country and state may “save” money in the short term, but we will all pay more later.
It is imperative that Connecticut takes proactive steps to protect its residents. The clearest path forward is for the state to expand and strengthen community health centers (CHCs), which provide affordable primary care and prevent emergency room overcrowding.
Currently, the state supports 17 federally qualified CHCs, serving more than 440,000 Connecticut residents, which is about 1 in 8 people statewide. These centers operate hundreds of sites in urban, suburban, and rural areas, including school-based clinics, mobile units, and service-delivery points in medically underserved towns. About 60% of CHC patients in Connecticut are on Medicaid, while a significant portion are uninsured or underinsured, which are populations often shut out of private practices.
Strengthening CHCs would have far-reaching impacts on both access and system stability. These clinics provide consistent, high-quality outpatient and preventive care, including primary care, prenatal services, chronic disease management, mental health treatment, dental care, and substance-use services. This reduces the likelihood that patients delay treatment until their condition becomes an emergency. CHCs also serve large numbers of uninsured and underinsured residents through sliding-fee scales, ensuring that people can still receive care even if they lose Medicaid coverage.
By investing in community health centers, Connecticut can keep its citizens healthy, reduce long waits, and ensure timely care even as federal cuts take effect.
Access to healthcare should not depend on ZIP code, income level, or politics. It is the foundation of community well-being and a prerequisite for a functioning healthcare system.
The clock is ticking. The waiting room is filling. Connecticut must choose to care for its residents before the wait becomes even longer.
Vicky Wang is a junior at Sacred Heart University, majoring in Health Science with a Public Health Concentration. She is planning to pursue a master’s in physician assistant studies.
Connecticut
Opinion: When getting care means going into debt
The email is sitting in my inbox like a countdown clock: $5,000 due to secure my surgery date. Another $7,000 required on the day of the procedure. Before even getting there, I had already paid $800 just for a consultation and thousands more from emergency room visits, trying to manage the pain.
As a college student in a single-parent household, these costs are not just overwhelming; they are destabilizing. For my family, this isn’t just a medical decision; it’s a financial crisis that affects bills, groceries, and basic stability.
This isn’t an unusual story; it’s what accessing healthcare looks like for too many people in Connecticut today. When the cost of care becomes this overwhelming, patients are forced to make impossible choices: delay treatment, go into debt, or simply go without.
This is why Connecticut lawmakers must pass SB3: An Act Concerning Health Care Affordability. The bill directly addresses one of the most urgent public health issues in our state: the rising cost of healthcare and the barriers it creates for everyday citizens. SB3 is not just a general attempt to “lower costs.” It proposes specific, actionable solutions.
The bill would establish a Connecticut Affordable Health Care Trust Fund to stabilize costs and protect residents from rising premiums, particularly as federal subsidies become uncertain. It also includes a “Connecticut Option” program designed to expand access to more affordable insurance coverage and, in the short term, replace federal premium subsidies for many residents earning up to 600% of the federal poverty level.
Healthcare affordability is not just an economic issue; it is a public health crisis. According to a report from theKaiser Family Foundation, nearly half of U.S. adults report difficulty affording healthcare, and many delay or skip necessary services as a result. These delays can lead to worsening conditions, more emergency visits, and higher long-term costs for both patients and the healthcare system. In my case, postponing treatment for endometriosis only led to repeated ER visits, each one adding to the financial and physical burden.
Ella Nocera-DeJulioConnecticut is not immune to these trends. Reports show that residents across the state, especially those with low and moderate incomes, struggle with high premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs. Even those with insurance often face significant financial barriers when seeking care. This reality contradicts the very purpose of a healthcare system: to provide timely, effective treatment without causing financial harm.
Some critics argue that bills like SB3 could increase government spending or place additional strain on healthcare providers. Others question whether it goes far enough, pointing out gaps in coverage, such as limited inclusion of certain populations. These concerns deserve attention, but they do not outweigh the urgency of the problem. In fact, SB3 is designed as both a short-term solution to stabilize costs and a long-term framework to explore broader reforms.
Passing SB3 would help more than just individual patients. When people can afford regular checkups and early treatment, long-term illnesses are easier to manage, fewer people end up in the emergency room, and healthcare costs go down overall. This leads to healthier communities and a better-functioning healthcare system. In simpler terms, making healthcare more affordable isn’t just the right thing to do; it’s also a smart decision.
My experience is just one example, but it reflects a much larger issue affecting communities across Connecticut. No one should have to delay a necessary surgery or accumulate thousands of dollars in debt just to receive basic medical care. Healthcare shouldn’t be something only available to people who can afford it, but a basic right supported by strong and effective policies.
Connecticut has a real chance to fix a system that is clearly not working for many people. Passing SB3 would help lower costs and make it easier for residents to get the care they need without financial stress. It’s time for lawmakers to take action and make healthcare more affordable and accessible for everyone.
Ella Nocera-DeJulio is a sophomore at Sacred Heart University, majoring in Health Sciences, concentrating in Occupational Therapy.
Connecticut
6 Little-Known Towns In Connecticut
Connecticut sat out most of the suburban-era tear-down that reshaped New England, and the smaller towns kept hold of specific, improbable things that anywhere else would have been paved over by 1975. A 1769 ferry still crossing the river on schedule. A 1784 law school, the country’s first, still standing as a museum. A pink Gothic cottage with the original 1846 boxwood parterre in the yard. A stone castle built by the actor who made the curved Sherlock Holmes pipe famous on stage. A 1752 house where George Washington and Rochambeau actually sat down and mapped out Yorktown. These six towns are where that kind of specificity survives, and where walking a block still puts you next to the real thing.
Litchfield
Litchfield’s claim to national history is that Judge Tapping Reeve started teaching law out of his home here in 1784, making this the site of the country’s first formal law school. Reeve taught Aaron Burr, two future Vice Presidents, a hundred and one members of Congress, and enough Supreme Court justices that the graduate roster reads like a founding-era directory. The Tapping Reeve House and the adjoining Law School, now a museum, are exactly where they were.
The rest of the town played to that register. Litchfield was a Revolutionary War supply hub and later an abolitionist center. The Litchfield History Museum fills in the wider picture, with rotating exhibits on local industry, abolition, and 18th-century domestic life. For an afternoon outside, the White Memorial Conservation Center sits on the edge of town with more than 4,000 acres of woods, meadow, and trail, and Bantam Lake, the largest natural lake in the state, is minutes south. The Litchfield Hills Farm-Fresh Market draws a Saturday crowd at the Litchfield Firehouse, just outside the Historic District and its 18th-century buildings.
Old Saybrook
Katharine Hepburn grew up summering in Old Saybrook and kept a house on Fenwick Point until her death in 2003. The Katharine Hepburn Cultural Arts Center, known locally as “The Kate,” now occupies the 1911 former town hall and runs a full theater calendar built around her memory. That is only the most famous thread in a town that has been here since 1635, when Old Saybrook was chartered at the mouth of the Connecticut River as an independent colony before folding into the Connecticut Colony in 1644.
Fort Saybrook Monument Park covers the original fortification site. Saybrook Point opens up wide water views across the river mouth, and Harvey’s Beach shallows out gently enough for families to wade in. Come late June, the Celebrate Saybrook Street Party shuts down Main Street for live music and food vendors.
Wethersfield
The room where Yorktown got planned is on the second floor of the Joseph Webb House, at the north end of Main Street. In May 1781, George Washington rode into town with a small staff, met French General Rochambeau at the Webb House, and the two of them sat there for five days working out the campaign that would end the Revolutionary War five months later. The house has been here since 1752 and still looks essentially as it did that week.
Wethersfield claims the title of Connecticut’s “most ancient town” and dates its founding to 1634. The Old Wethersfield Historic District holds more than 300 historic houses, around 50 of them built before the Revolution, which is a lot by American standards. The Webb-Deane-Stevens Museum tours three of them on adjacent lots: the 1752 Webb House, the 1769 Silas Deane House, and the 1789 Isaac Stevens House, each staged to a different period. The Keeney Memorial Cultural Center fills a red-brick Victorian building with local artifacts. September brings CornFest at Cove Park, where Wethersfield Cove also handles the kayak and waterfront walk traffic the rest of the year.
Chester
The Chester-Hadlyme Ferry has been pushing across the Connecticut River since 1769, and it still runs a seasonal schedule of short crossings between the two banks. When you board, you are stepping onto Connecticut’s second-oldest continuously operating ferry, behind only the Rocky Hill-Glastonbury Ferry, which has been running since 1655. The ride is short, five to ten minutes depending on the current, and the river views frame Gillette Castle on the ridgeline across the water.
The rest of Chester grew up around industry: the town was incorporated in 1836 and turned out ivory combs, bits, and augers during the Industrial Revolution. The small downtown is a lived-in two-block stretch, best in summer and early fall when the Chester Sunday Market sets up with produce, baked goods, and live music. Cedar Lake, just outside the village, handles the swim-and-paddleboard side of the weekend.
Woodstock
The house that anchors Woodstock is Pepto-Bismol pink. Built in 1846 for New York publisher Henry Chandler Bowen, Roseland Cottage was an early and very loud piece of Gothic Revival architecture, complete with gabled rooflines, stained glass, and an original boxwood parterre garden laid out in the same year. Presidents from Grant to McKinley showed up for Fourth of July parties here. The cottage is now a National Historic Landmark open for tours, and the pink still looks right.
Settled in 1686, Woodstock occupies Connecticut’s northeastern “Quiet Corner” and butts up against Massachusetts. Woodstock Academy, founded in 1801, is among the oldest secondary schools in the state and still holds classes in several of its 19th-century buildings. Woodstock Orchards and Bakery Barn keep the pick-your-own and cider-donut traditions running. The Labor Day weekend Woodstock Fair, running since 1860, is one of the largest in the state, and the Air Line State Park Trail, built on an old rail bed, handles the hiking and biking.
East Haddam
William Gillette was the actor who did more than anyone to define Sherlock Holmes on stage, and his version of the detective lent the curved calabash pipe to a century of pop culture imagery. (The deerstalker came earlier, from Sidney Paget’s Strand Magazine illustrations.) What Gillette did with the royalties is Gillette Castle, a 24-room fieldstone medieval-style mansion he designed himself and built between 1914 and 1919 on a bluff over the Connecticut River. The house is full of personal eccentricities: 47 hand-carved doors, each with a unique wooden latch; a sliding table on rails; a system of mirrors he used to see who was at the front door without leaving the parlor. Gillette Castle State Park opens the house and grounds to the public.
East Haddam was founded in 1734 along the river. The Goodspeed Opera House, completed in 1877, still puts on musical theater. The venue has sent 21 productions to Broadway, including the world premieres of Annie, Man of La Mancha, and Shenandoah. The Nathan Hale Schoolhouse is the one-room building where the Revolutionary War hero taught before enlisting. Chapman Falls drops about 60 feet through Devil’s Hopyard State Park, a short drive north. The East Haddam Swing Bridge, built in 1913 and recently reopened after a major repair, is the kind of thing you photograph before crossing.
The Final Word
A pattern holds across these six: the thing that matters is still exactly where it always was. Washington and Rochambeau’s table is still upstairs at the Webb House. The 1769 ferry is still hauling cars across the river. Tapping Reeve’s law office is still standing next to the house. Gillette is still rigging his 47 doors for a century-old audience. Connecticut’s smaller towns never let the specific get replaced with the generic, and that is the whole reason to go.
Connecticut
Opinion: A workers retention law for ALL CT workers
On paper, Connecticut is economically thriving – jobs are at an all-time high with over 1.7 million positions in the state, as reported by the state Department of Labor (DOL). With over 5,000 jobs added for the month of January in various industries, as well as a projected surplus upwards of over $164.5 million for the Fiscal Year 2026, it’s a promising trajectory for our state and should demonstrate that Connecticut labor is as strong as it’s ever been.
But while it’s true that from an economic standpoint Connecticut is doing well, I look to our workers —our everyday people— to truly determine how successful we are at meeting our residents’ needs.
And right now, there are significant problems in our state that need to be addressed, from the well-known crisis in affordability to the seemingly intractable limits faced by many low-wage, hourly workers in scheduling and organizing that are so longstanding, they may seem invisible.
But there are also problems that thousands of Connecticut workers face that we can easily tackle in this session. At the top of that list is the issue faced by contracted workers, most of them building cleaners, who regularly lose good jobs without any fair reason or fair warning.
Throughout my life of advocating for safer, fair, and just workplaces, I am constantly met with the same recurring issue: new contractors who waltz in and completely usurp the status quo, terminating the jobs and upending the lives of workers who preceded them, no matter how long or how well they’d served the building’s occupants. Often, this happens once a building is sold or there is a transition in management, which results in the replacement of the building’s entire workforces.
The people whose lives are upended are often parents, spouses, and caretakers who have performed the job for decades, workers with unmatchable institutional knowledge. Such abrupt terminations can also result in a loss of health insurance and other benefits, a psychological shock that is worsened by the turbulence of war, tripling inflation, and Connecticut’s already high cost of living.
I’ve worked alongside several unions in Connecticut, as well as worked for a few myself prior to becoming state senator, and I have seen this shock issued by new contractors and building owners again and again. In 2024, I fought alongside 14 former custodians at ARKA group who were abruptly displaced when the company hired a nonunion contractor. It took over a year for many of these workers to get backpay for lost wages, and for some of them to return to their original postings.
I’m seeing this again in Norwalk with the most recent grievance being handled by building service worker union 32BJ, part of the Service Employees International Union. Elsa Guerrero and Corina Palacio, two part-time workers who were recently let go by a new cleaning contractor who took over at 40 Richards Avenue in Norwalk.
In the case of Elsa, in particular, the toll of losing her only source of income has been almost crippling. With her job, she was supporting a sister back home in Peru with a delicate health condition, and she is now left reeling, wondering how her sister will manage. For Corina, this was one of two part-time jobs she was working to make ends meet to support her and her child. However, with only one job now and daily expenses that keep adding up, the impact of her termination grows larger everyday.
These are the real costs of companies terminating employees abruptly when taking over a new worksite.
It is because of these situations that we’re urging the passage of effective, statewide worker’s retention laws in Connecticut, S.B. 358 and H.B. 5003. Both of these bills directly address this issue by protecting workers’ jobs for 90 days following a contractor change at their worksite, giving the worker time to find new work and the employer time to consider the value that worker brings to the worksite, without ending their right to ultimately hire whomever they choose.
As it currently stands in Connecticut, workers employed by building-service contractors have no legal right to keep their jobs if their owner decides to replace the workforce. With proper worker’s retention laws in place, workers are given some agency.
Connecticut would not be the first to establish such a framework; states like New Jersey, California, and Delaware share that honor. However, there has never been a more important time for a worker’s retention bill.
We have an obligation as lawmakers do all that’s possible to support workers like Elsa and Corina by giving them access to a resource whose value is often incalculable –- time.
State Sen. Julie Kushner of the 24th District is Deputy President Pro Tempore and represents Danbury and portions of New Fairfield and Ridgefield.
-
New York1 hour agoA Shelter’s Closing Is a Turning Point for Homeless Policy
-
Detroit, MI2 hours agoWhere to watch Detroit Tigers vs Atlanta Braves: TV channel, start time, streaming for Apr. 28
-
San Francisco, CA2 hours agoSan Francisco starts $4M removal of controversial Vaillancourt Fountain
-
Dallas, TX2 hours agoGame Day Guide: Stars vs Wild | Dallas Stars
-
Miami, FL2 hours agoA new airport? A larger port? All that was said at the ‘State of the Ports’ in Miami
-
Boston, MA2 hours agoLawsuit that alleges Boston is inflating commercial property taxes goes to court this week
-
Denver, CO2 hours agoPhoenix vs. Denver: How the Valley of the Sun Dethroned the Mile High City as the West’s Luxury Heavyweight
-
Seattle, WA2 hours agoVIDEO: Special delivery at West Seattle Bee Garden