“Connecticut’s correctional system is operating in a state of sustained institutional failure.”

That’s what a new report by the Office of the Correction Ombuds concluded after looking into complaints and reports across the state’s correctional facilities for over a year.

The OCO was re-established in September 2024 and submitted its inaugural 2025 report. Despite the OCO lacking a full investigative staff, they investigated reported incidents, conditions, and complaints at the state’s correctional facilities.

According to the report, the conditions they found were consistent across many facilities and underscored the “seriousness and pervasiveness of the issues confronting Connecticut’s correctional system.

“These are not isolated lapses or temporary disruptions,” the report stated. “They are structural deficiencies, embedded in daily operations. In many respects, [the Department of Corrections (DOC)] appears to be failing to fulfill its statutory mandates.

You can read the entire report here.

The OCO found that the DOC relied heavily on modified and full facility lockdowns when faced with staffing shortages. Lockdowns are usually limited measures that are used in genuine emergencies in facilities.

According to DOC, there were 387 reported lockdowns in 2025. When facilities go into lockdown, visitation, recreation time, educational and therapy programs, religious services, hygiene, medical needs, and access to law libraries and communications are suspended.

The OCO said they received numerous complaints that people were confined to their cells for days at a time. This caused people to miss their medical appointments, go days without showers, and lose visits with family members.

The report stated that the lockdowns occurred “predictably” around weekends, holidays, and other staffing-stress points. According to OCO, while they acknowledge the staffing difficulties that the DOC has, the evidence shows there are no minimum staffing standards and no limits on the frequency or duration of lockdowns.

Mental health and medical needs were also the subject of many complaints to the OCO, according to the report. The OCO cited a December 2025 report from Disability Rights Connecticut that found sexual assault and systemic safety failures at York Correctional Institution, particularly affecting people with disabilities.

Also in late 2025, the Office of the Child Advocate issued a report that found repeated, unjustified use of force against youth at Manson Youth Institution.

According to the OCO, these were due to lack of staffing, inadequate training, and “weak internal controls.”

When it comes to the living conditions at the facilities, the OCO observed unsanitary and “degrading living conditions.” This included mold-contaminated ventilation, rodent infestations, sewage backups, and prolonged denial of hygiene supplies and shower access.

The OCO said that the conditions also affect correctional staff who work prolonged shifts.

An investigation into the Inmate Legal Assistance Program revealed deficiencies so significant that the office had to resort to “enforcement litigation” to obtain records from a state contractor that performed the services.

“That such litigation was required to secure basic oversight cooperation is itself a serious concern,” the OCO said in the report.

The OCO also cited multiple audits done on the DOC’s operations. The audits reported repeated findings, including improper extended paid administrative leave, weaknesses in overtime and payroll controls, failures in asset management, and repeated noncompliance with statutory reporting requirements.

“The recurrence of these findings over multiple audit cycles reflects a failure to implement corrective action–failures that directly affect staffing availability, infrastructure maintenance, transparency, and public trust,” the report said.

The OCO said there was cooperation with the DOC wardens, staff, and central offices, who responded to inquiries and engaged with oversight efforts.

“The [OCO] submits this report as both a record and a warning: Absent decisive intervention, Connecticut risks entrenching a correctional system defined by instability, isolation, and preventable harm,” the report concluded.

NBC Connecticut has reached out to the DOC for a comment on the report and has not heard back at this time.

HARTFORD, CT (WFSB) – A new survey ranked the best and worst states in which to drive.

The personal finance website WalletHub published the survey on Tuesday.

WalletHub said it compared the 50 states across 31 metrics of a positive commute. The data included average gas prices, rush hour traffic congestion, and road quality.

Connecticut ranked as not the best, but also not the worst.

It put the state as 22nd on the list, which put it toward the “best” half of the country.

Here’s how the state fared in the metrics that contributed to its overall rank:

• 35th in ownership and maintenance
• 35th in traffic and infrastructure
• 2nd in safety
• 19th in access to vehicles and maintenance rank

“Owning a car can really squeeze your wallet if you’re not in the right location,” said Chip Lupo, WalletHub analyst. “On top of having pricey gas, maintenance and insurance expenses, some states can hurt you even more financially with excessive traffic congestion, which wastes both your fuel and your productivity. The best states to drive in are ones that are relatively rural, with smaller populations, a low cost of living, well-maintained roads and safe motorists.”

The top three best driving states were Vermont, Iowa, and Kansas.

The worst were Montana, Washington, and Hawaii.

Read the complete list on WalletHub’s website here.

Copyright 2026 WFSB. All rights reserved.

Willimantic fire officials say one person is in critical condition after an apartment fire Sunday night.

The fire broke out just before 10 p.m. at the Armory Apartments on Pleasant Street. Fire crews received several 911 calls reporting the blaze, as well as a notification from the building’s fire alarms.

Willimantic fire crews arrived minutes later and found smoke and fire coming from the back of the building. Officials said one person was out of the building and was injured.

The Willimantic Police Department assisted in evacuating other residents from the apartments. The resident who was injured was taken to Hartford Hospital for serious burn injuries and then transferred to the Bridgeport Hospital burn center, according to officials.

Crews tackled the fire, which also extended to the second-floor apartment and into the attic. The fire was escalated to a second alarm for additional mutual aid.

Officials said the snow made the roads “less than ideal” for reaching the scene.

After crews worked to open ceilings and walls, the flames were visible through ventilation openings in the room, and a third alarm was raised for additional resources. Willimantic fire crews were assisted by other fire departments from North Windham, Windham Center, Windham Hospital paramedics, Mansfield, University of Connecticut, Columbia, Coventry, Hebron, Scotland, and Norwich.

The fire was eventually brought under control and fully extinguished.

“I’m proud of [the fire crews’] efforts and grateful to our mutual aid partners for their assistance in helping us bring this incident under control,” Fire Chief Ron Palmer, Jr., said.

The building once served as a state armory and was renovated years prior into a 30-unit apartment, officials said. Six apartments were affected by fire, smoke, or water damage and have been ruled uninhabitable.

The Windham Fire Marshal’s office, along with the Connecticut State Police Fire Explosion Investigation Unit, will be investigating the cause of the fire.