Connect with us

News

White House accuses fed Judge Kent Wetherell of ‘sabotage’ after blocking potential mass release of migrants

Published

on

White House accuses fed Judge Kent Wetherell of ‘sabotage’ after blocking potential mass release of migrants

WASHINGTON — White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre attacked a federal judge for “sabotage” Friday after the jurist blocked the potential mass release of migrants at the US-Mexico border — as President Biden offered no comment on the crisis at his only public event of the day.

Jean-Pierre made the unusual attack on Florida US District Judge Kent Wetherell hours after he forbade the release of migrants on “parole” without a court date if detention capacity is exceeded, issuing the order hours before the end of the Title 42 COVID-19 expulsion program.

“On the ruling that you just you just laid out to me — so look, the way we see that, it’s sabotage, it’s pure and simple. That’s how that reads to us,” Jean-Pierre said. “The claims that CBP is allowing or encouraging release of migrants is just categorically false … and it is a harmful ruling.”

In fact, The Post and other outlets have reported on hundreds of migrants being sent on to the American interior from border cities. In El Paso, Texas alone, more than 1,100 migrants were released from US Customs and Border Protection custody on Thursday.

Jean-Pierre reaffirmed her choice of words moments later, again saying, “it’s a harmful ruling … we need Congress — beyond the ruling, beyond what we’re seeing from the sabotage, pure and simple … we want Congress to act.”

Advertisement
Karine Jean-Pierre attacked a federal judge for “sabotage” Friday.
Al Drago/UPI/Shutterstock

When yet another journalist asked Jean-Pierre whether she was attacking the judge or Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, who brought the suit, Jean-Pierre said, “I won’t go into a specific person,” passing on the opportunity to disavow her disparagement of one of the other two branches of government.

The White House’s main spokeswoman didn’t specify what policies Congress should enact to address the border rush.

Biden, meanwhile, didn’t mention the dramatic scenes unfolding at the border while welcoming Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to the White House — the US leader’s only scheduled public appearance of the day.

“We are both facing the challenges of migration in the Western Hemisphere and you’re doing a heck of a job,” Biden told Sanchez before refusing to answer any shouted reporter questions.

Jean-Pierre defended Biden’s lack of comment on the crisis after he predicted a “chaotic” period at the frontier on Tuesday.

Advertisement

“Secretary [Alejandro] Mayorkas is a powerful messenger,” Jean-Pierre said, referring to the Homeland Security secretary who appeared in the White House briefing room on Thursday.

“He took your questions twice this week,” Jean-Pierre said of Biden, adding that “a week ago today, he sat down and had a one-on-one interview with one of your colleagues, [MSNBC anchor Stephanie Ruhle] … and was asked about Title 42.”


Migrants wait for food and water to be handed handed out, after gathering between the primary and secondary border fences, between the United States and Mexico, after the lifting of COVID-19 era Title 42 restrictions that have blocked migrants at the border from seeking asylum since 2020, near San Diego, California, U.S., May 12, 2023.
In El Paso, Texas alone, more than 1,100 migrants were released from US Customs and Border Protection custody on Thursday.
REUTERS

A DHS-organized press call on Friday morning, meanwhile, triggered outrage when administration officials required press to pre-submit their questions. An official later told Fox News journalist Jacqui Heinrich that the vetting of queries would not happen again and that it was “a new system… in an effort of transparency” to ask journalists for their questions in advance.

Meanwhile, throngs of migrants waited to cross the border Friday in blistering heat and a leaked Department of Homeland Security memo reported by the New York Times said the crisis could get much worse. An estimated 660,000 migrants from around the world may be in Mexico planning to enter the US, the memo said.

What is Title 42 and what does its end mean for US border immigration?

What is Title 42?

Title 42 is a federal health measure enforced by the US Border Patrol. It allows the agency to kick certain migrants out of the US and return them to Mexico. This includes asylum seekers, who under international law have the legal right to make an asylum claim in America.

Currently, migrants who cross the border illegally and who are from Cuba, El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua or Venezuela are subject to Title 42 and could be sent to Mexico.

Advertisement

How did Title 42 start?

President Donald Trump invoked the law in 2020 at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, asking the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to issue the policy. The Trump administration made the case that keeping migrants out of the country would slow down the spread of infections and maintain the safety of federal agents encountering migrants.

What has happened with Title 42 under Biden?

When President Biden took over, he continued to enforce Title 42 with one important change from his predecessor. Biden said Border Patrol agents were only allowed to expel migrants from certain countries under his direction. That meant migrants seeking asylum from countries like Cuba and Venezuela could still seek asylum if they arrived at the border and stay in the US while their cases were decided in court — unless they had a criminal record.

What is happening with Title 42 now?

Title 42 is supposed to be a health policy, not an immigration law. It will end at 11:59 p.m. May 11, when the Biden administration ends all COVID-19-related policies.

Why is it controversial?

Many have called for the policy’s end, saying it’s illegal and that international law guarantees people the right to seek asylum.

Others, like Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, warn that the southern border could see up to 13,000 migrants per day crossing with the intention to stay in the country when the measure ends.

Advertisement

What would the end of Title 42 mean for immigration into the US?

It’s unclear exactly how many people have been expelled under Title 42 because there have been scores of people who have attempted to enter the country numerous times and been rejected again and again, but the US Border Patrol said it made an all-time high of more than 2.3 million arrests at the border in the last fiscal year. Forty percent of people who were expelled from the country were ejected under the rules of Title 42.

READ MORE

The migrant crisis began shortly after Biden took office and Republicans accuse him of creating new “pull” factors — a stance also taken by the presidents of Guatemala and Mexico. Biden aides generally emphasis “push” factors such as crime and poverty and say the COVID-19 pandemic worsened them.

On his first day in office in January 2021, Biden halted funding to construct former President Donald Trump’s US-Mexico border wall. That June, Biden ended Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” policy that required most asylum seekers who reached the southern border to await US court rulings south of the border.


Joe Biden
Republicans also accuse Biden of illegally allowing nearly one million migrants arrested at the border while Title 42 was in effect.
REUTERS

The Biden administration this week also sought to direct blame for the border rush onto what it branded a “broken” immigration system. Biden’s proposals for reform included legalizing almost all migrants currently in the US illegally, which Republicans say would incentivize even more new arrivals.

Republicans also accuse Biden of illegally allowing nearly 1 million migrants arrested at the border while Title 42 was in effect to be released into the US without a court date under “parole” programs or via notices to report to badly backlogged local ICE offices, where they will be placed into legal proceedings and have their asylum claims adjudicated.

Advertisement

New York City’s ICE office backlog means that migrants may wait a decade just for an appointment to get a court date. Immigration courts then take on average another four years to reach a decision.

Asylum applicants are granted US work permits while they wait and any children they have in the US automatically become citizens — setting the stage for potential heartbreak years later if their claims are denied, as most ultimately are, immigration hardliners say.

In fiscal 2021 courts denied 63% of asylum claims — and judges denied 71% of claims the year before, according to data compiled by the University of Syracuse.

A Biden administration parole program rolled out in January sought to tamp down illegal border crossings by allowing 30,000 people per month from four nations — Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela — to get pre-approval to enter the US at legal points of entry and then await court rulings, which some Republican politicians also decry as illegal.

The Biden administration gradually relaxed enforcement of Title 42, which under former President Donald Trump was used to turn away nearly everyone who illegally crossed the border during the pandemic. Biden at first allowed unaccompanied minors to remain, then gradually allowed greater numbers of family units and single adults.

Advertisement

There were nearly 2.4 million arrests for illegally crossing the US-Mexico border in fiscal 2022, which ended Sept. 30 — up from an elevated 1.7 million in fiscal 2021, fewer than 500,000 in fiscal 2020 and nearly 1 million in fiscal 2019. Those figures do not include migrants who evaded arrest.

So far in fiscal 2023, apprehensions of migrants are up 4% at the southern border.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Teen Who Set Off Avalanche Is Fourth Person Killed on Alaska Slopes This Month

Published

on

Teen Who Set Off Avalanche Is Fourth Person Killed on Alaska Slopes This Month

An Alaska teenager who was riding a snowmobile was killed on Saturday when he set off an avalanche and was buried, becoming the fourth person in the state to lose their life in a mountain slide this month, the authorities said.

The number is high for Alaska, which forecasters say in recent years has been averaging three avalanche deaths annually.

The 16-year-old, whose body was recovered on Sunday, was identified by the Alaska State Troopers as Tucker Challan of Soldotna, Alaska. He was buried under about 10 feet of snow while riding in Turnagain Pass in the Kenai Mountains, about 60 miles south of Anchorage.

The avalanche occurred on the backside of Seattle Ridge, in a popular recreation area known as Warmup Bowl, the Chugach National Forest Avalanche Information Center said.

At the time, the center reported, there was a weak layer of frost about two to three feet beneath the snow surface, which experts say can easily collapse and cause an avalanche. The layers form when the weather is clear and present a hidden danger with each new winter storm.

Advertisement

“It’s like a layer cake,” Wendy Wagner, the center’s director, said in a phone interview on Monday. “It has been causing many avalanches.”

According to the center, a group of people who were riding snow machines — often referred to as snowmobiles outside Alaska — dug Tucker out of the snow in about an hour, but he had died from his injuries.

On the afternoon of his death, the center held an avalanche awareness program in a parking lot on the other side of the ridge, which it said was a coincidence. It is continuing to warn that people should avoid traveling on or below steep terrain.

Noting that avalanches can reach speeds over 60 miles per hour, Ms. Wagner said that snowmobile riders and skiers should not assume that the snowpack is stable because other people have crossed it.

“There can be a sense that if you trigger something that you can outrun it,” she said. “Just because there have been tracks on a slope doesn’t mean that slope is safe.”

Advertisement

On March 4, three people who were part of a helicopter skiing excursion were killed when they were swept away in an avalanche near Girdwood, Alaska, about 20 miles from where Saturday’s slide happened.

The authorities identified the three men as David Linder, 39, of Florida; Charles Eppard, 39, of Montana; and Jeremy Leif, 38, of Minnesota.

Despite deploying their avalanche airbags, according to the helicopter skiing company that the skiers had hired, they were buried beneath 40 to 100 feet of snow and could not be reached.

Ms. Wagner said this year had been particularly treacherous in Alaska.

“It’s been an unusual year,” she said, “tragically.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump to hit countries that buy Venezuelan oil with 25% tariff

Published

on

Donald Trump to hit countries that buy Venezuelan oil with 25% tariff

Donald Trump said the US would impose a 25 per cent tariff on all imports from any country that buys oil from Venezuela, a move that could roil crude markets and sharply raise levies on goods from China and India.

The announcement on Monday came days ahead of the president’s planned unveiling of a new tariff regime on US trading partners and amid a chaotic trade policy rollout marked by reversals and U-turns.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he was imposing the tariff for “numerous reasons”, alleging that “Venezuela has purposefully and deceitfully sent to the United States, undercover, tens of thousands of high level, and other, criminals, many of whom are murderers and people of a very violent nature”.

Venezuela exported 660,000 barrels a day of crude globally last year, according to consultancy Kpler. China, which has been hit with 20 per cent tariffs from Trump this year, is among the top buyers, alongside India, Spain and Italy.

Speaking to reporters later on Monday, Trump said the 25 per cent tariffs on buyers of Venezuelan crude would come in addition to any existing levies.

Advertisement

“That’s on top of existing tariffs — yes,” the president said.

The US imported about 230,000 b/d from Venezuela in 2024, making the South American nation its fourth-biggest supplier last year.

The latest escalation of Trump’s trade war comes days after Caracas agreed to begin receiving planeloads of deported migrants from the US, in a concession to the US president.

The move risks stoking turmoil in the oil market, something the White House has been keen to avoid in an attempt to prevent supply disruption from raising petrol prices for American motorists. Brent crude rose 1.3 per cent following the announcement.

“If we see Venezuelan supply coming out of the market, that means less global supply, which means oil prices go up,” said Matt Smith, lead oil analyst at Kpler. “That gets passed on to prices of the pump, which is the opposite of President Trump’s goals.”

Advertisement

The US president referred to Monday’s unprecedented move as a “secondary tariff” and said it would take effect from April 2, which he has dubbed “liberation day”, when reciprocal levies on other countries will also come into force.

Analysts said countries were likely to cut imports rather than risk the tariffs.

“We have never [before] seen secondary tariffs but a literal interpretation of Trump’s Truth Social statement suggests it could lead to a significant disruption to Venezuelan exports,” said Fernando Ferreira, director of geopolitical risk at consultancy Rapidan Energy. 

“Absent clarification from the administration on potential exemptions, I suspect most countries will self-sanction to avoid across-the-board tariffs on all exports to the US,” he added.

The US Treasury recently cancelled Chevron’s licence to operate in Venezuela, which is under broad sanctions, ordering the California-based oil group to wind down its operations within 30 days.

Advertisement

The Treasury on Monday extended the deadline for Chevron to wind down its oil production in the country until May 27.

Chevron’s licence allowed it to export about 200,000 b/d last year, which Venezuela’s democratic opposition said contributed to funding repression by President Nicolás Maduro’s government.

Chevron declined to comment on either Monday’s tariff announcement or the Treasury extension. The Venezuelan government did not respond to a request for comment.

As part of Venezuela’s agreement to resume accepting deportees from the US, a flight carrying 199 people landed near Caracas on Sunday.

Trump has in recent weeks pushed to deport hundreds of alleged members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang, which the US has designated a terrorist organisation.

Advertisement

In his Truth Social post on Monday, the president referenced the gang and said Venezuela had been “very hostile to the United States and the Freedoms which we espouse”.

Earlier this month, the US deported some alleged gang members to El Salvador, where President Nayib Bukele had agreed to hold them in the country’s “very good jails at a fair price that will also save our taxpayer dollars”.

The Department of Justice on Monday said it would deport three alleged Tren de Aragua members to Chile.

The Maduro government, which has often used the exodus of its citizens as leverage in negotiations with Washington, said migrants had been “kidnapped” and sent to El Salvador.

Ryan Berg, director of the Americas programme at Washington think-tank Center for Strategic and International Studies, said if the tariffs hit all countries that have companies with business in Venezuela’s oil sector, they could further isolate Maduro as he seeks to consolidate power.

Advertisement

“This tariff could actually have a significant impact on making companies exit from Venezuela’s oil market,” Berg said. “We’re in entirely uncharted territory right now.”

Continue Reading

News

Judge contends Nazis got more due process than Trump deportees did

Published

on

Judge contends Nazis got more due process than Trump deportees did

In this handout photo provided by the Salvadoran government, members of the Salvadorian army stand guard at CECOT on March 16, 2025 in Tecoluca, El Salvador. The Trump administration deported alleged members of Tren de Aragua gang and others to El Salvador.

Handout/Salvadoran government via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Handout/Salvadoran government via Getty Images

The Trump administration received pointed questions from a judge over how it’s implementing a rarely-used wartime law to deport Venezuelans suspected of being Tren de Aragua gang members.

A president last invoked the Alien Enemies Act after the attack on Pearl Harbor, designating Japanese, German and Italian nationals as “alien enemies” during World War II.

“Nazis got better treatment under the Alien Enemies Act than what has happened here,” D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Patricia Millett said during a hearing at the court on Monday. “And they had hearing boards before they were removed.”

Advertisement

“People weren’t given notice, they weren’t told where they were going,” she said about the removal of Venezuelans and others to El Salvador earlier this month.

Lawyers with the Justice Department are asking the appeals court in Washington to overturn a temporary restraining order blocking deportations under the act put in place by district court Judge James Boasberg. A ruling to lift the temporary pause on deportations, or keep it in place, is likely to prompt an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The fight over the rarely used wartime power has become central to Trump’s immigration crackdown agenda and his efforts to stretch the power of the executive branch.

The panel of three judges did not deliver a decision from the bench but could do so in the coming days.

Judge Millett appeared sympathetic to the arguments of immigrants rights groups who sought to block immediate deportations, but it is unclear which way Judge Karen Henderson, a George W. Bush appointee, was leaning.

Advertisement

According to court documents, if the judge lifts the pause, some 258 people would likely be placed in removal proceedings under the Alien Enemies Act for being alleged members of Tren de Aragua.

DOJ says pause was “enormous intrusion” on president’s power

Justice Department lawyers argued that Boasberg’s order to pause removals under the act is an “unprecedented and enormous intrusion” on the president’s power and that this type of “second-guessing” could potentially hurt the United States’ current and future deals with other countries. The U.S. has negotiated with El Salvador and other countries to take in deportees.

Drew Ensign, the government attorney leading the case, received pointed questions about how it could work for people detained or even removed under the Alien Enemies Act to bring up individual petitions to contest allegations they are members of the Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang.

“The problem here is that they are challenging implementation of the proclamation in a way that never gave anyone a chance to say, ‘I’m not covered,” Millett, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, said. She said prior cases clearly show the government needs to give people that due process.

Due process “can’t be an unlawful intrusion of the president’s powers. The president has to comply with the constitution and laws like everybody else,” she said.

Advertisement

Judge Justin Walker, who was appointed by Trump in 2020, was sympathetic to the government’s argument that those who are currently detained under the Alien Enemies Act should contest their arrests through a habeas petition, which is how someone can legally argue they are being unlawfully detained.

Walker suggested that the plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and Democracy Forward, should have filed in Texas as opposed to in D.C. The five Venezuelan plaintiffs that first filed the lawsuit are held in Texas, even though their lawyers argued that they now are also representing hundreds of people potentially subject to the act nationwide.

Still, Ensign said that should the judges side with the government and lift the pause on deportations, the government would not have a limitation and not be required to provide notice for those deported under the Alien Enemies Act.

Lower DC court keeps pause on deportations in place

Earlier in the day, Boasberg issued an order to keep in place his 14-day pause on the administration’s ability to deport anyone under the act.

Boasberg denied the government’s attempt to vacate his temporary restraining order, noting that immigrant rights groups were likely to win the argument in court that the men deported to El Salvador should have gotten individualized hearings to determine whether the act applied to them.

Advertisement

“Because the named Plaintiffs dispute that they are members of Tren de Aragua, they may not be deported until a court has been able to decide the merits of their challenge,” Boasberg wrote in his order. “Nor may any members of the provisionally certified class be removed until they have been given the opportunity to challenge their designations as well.”

Boasberg said the pause on the flights does not prevent the government from making arrests, or even deporting those it suspects of being members of Tren de Aragua.

He gave the immigrant rights groups until Wednesday to file a preliminary injunction, which could pave the way for an even longer court-ordered pause on the use of the wartime powers.

Boasberg also direct Trump’s cabinet secretaries to decide by Tuesday whether they were going to invoke a privilege that would allow them to not disclose information about the deportation flights.

Boasberg and the DOJ went back and forth over whether the administration ignored the judge’s order to not use the act to send 137 Venezuelans to El Salvador on March 15.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending