Connect with us

News

Wang Chuanfu, the BYD founder with a battery obsession

Published

on

Wang Chuanfu, the BYD founder with a battery obsession

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

From a certain perspective, this might have seemed like a rocky week for electric car maker BYD and its metallurgist-turned-billionaire founder Wang Chuanfu.

China’s rival to Tesla, which recently raised nearly $6bn to fund ambitious global expansion plans, is facing crises on three continents. Its plans for a multimillion-dollar factory in Mexico are drawing opposition from both the Mexican government and senior officials in Beijing worried about tech leakage.

Meanwhile BYD’s Hungary plant, key to unlocking the lucrative European market, is being investigated by Brussels. And in Brazil, local labour officials have accused the company of “slavery”-like conditions for workers building a factory in the north-eastern Bahia state.

Advertisement

Yet all of these problems paled beside BYD’s launch on Monday of a new battery charging system able to add driving range of about 470km in five minutes — a fraction of the time it takes a Tesla to add range.

For the 58-year-old Wang, this achievement takes him one step closer to his long-held vision of homegrown Chinese technology conquering the global market.

Investors, too, appear so far happy to regard overseas problems as growing pains that will not derail BYD. It has targeted sales of more than 5mn cars this year, including 1mn overseas, while also developing its energy storage business. The group’s Hong Kong-traded shares have retreated from a record high but are up more than 50 per cent this year.

Wang is “much more of a disrupter than many had expected”, says Ilaria Mazzocco, an expert on Chinese cleantech industrial policy at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. “He’s an empire builder: people should think about him in the same category as Bezos or Musk,” she adds.  

Born in 1966 in the eastern province of Anhui, Wang is part of a generation of Chinese entrepreneurs who escaped poverty to join the nation’s newly minted billionaire class, benefiting from Deng Xiaoping’s opening of China to the world and the ascent of the city of Shenzhen into a high-tech manufacturing powerhouse.

Advertisement

After his siblings toiled for years to fund their younger brother’s education, Wang moved to Shenzhen and co-founded BYD as a battery company in the mid-1990s, leveraging his academic background in chemistry and metallurgy to produce lithium batteries and other components for then mobile phone kings Nokia and Motorola.

Wang’s obsession with batteries led to a pivot to vehicles in the early 2000s. Cracking the five-minute charge this week builds on his pioneering “cell-to-body” technology — sandwiching a battery cell inside a vehicle’s structure.

Neil Beveridge, a senior analyst at Bernstein in Hong Kong, says the new charging system is the fastest on the market and, if it is widely adopted, “should put an end” to the range anxiety cited by consumers as a key reason not to embrace electric cars.

The latest battery advancement follows the release of a new driver-assistance system known as “God’s Eye” and lower sales at rival Tesla following Elon Musk’s foray into US politics. Together this could help BYD take a larger share of what EY estimates will be $660bn in annual revenue opportunities from the shift to EVs by 2030.

The company’s stock rally has also taken Wang’s personal net worth, according to Bloomberg data, to just shy of $30bn, making him one of China’s richest men. Despite that he remains a workaholic who lives humbly. His house is walking distance from BYD’s main factories and he dispatches lieutenants to public-facing events unless his attendance is absolutely necessary.

Advertisement

Underlings have long described Wang as a restrained, highly detail-orientated micromanager. His approval was once sought for a business unit to distribute fruit to team members.

But his passion for batteries has revealed a performative flare. To demonstrate to an investor just how safe his battery cells are, he has drunk battery electrolyte fluid. He has reused cells after trucks drove over them and frequently shows visitors batteries being penetrated by nails.

The release of the God’s Eye system in February reflects an important shift in his leadership. For years Wang, referred to internally only as “the chairman”, resisted following in the footsteps of rivals who were pouring money into driverless software development.

Now that assisted driving features are becoming a key selling point with Chinese consumers, younger BYD engineers are slowly gaining more of a voice within the company — driving a change in strategy.

Still, questions remain about whether BYD’s business model, so successful in China, can be exported abroad. BYD’s vertical integration — controlling supply chains from the lithium mines to factories — has been pivotal in producing low-cost cars. So has access to China’s migrant labour force and Beijing’s support for cleantech champions.

Advertisement

But in international markets, Wang must contend with a lack of subsidies, new supply chains, higher labour and environmental standards and deepening western fears over Chinese technological dominance.  

Still, Mark Greeven, professor of innovation and strategy at IMD China, says that the company’s speed, scale and supply chain control is likely to rock the global trade system. “I wonder is it that BYD is not ready for the world?” he said. “Or is the world not ready for BYD?”

edward.white@ft.com

News

Global stock markets tumble as Donald Trump’s tariffs loom

Published

on

Global stock markets tumble as Donald Trump’s tariffs loom

Stay informed with free updates

Global markets tumbled on Monday, with US stocks on track for their worst quarter since 2022, on fears of an escalating trade war led by President Donald Trump.

The S&P 500 was down 0.8 per cent in New York, having already fallen more than 5 per cent this quarter. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.9 per cent.

European and Asian stocks were also down sharply, accelerating a sell-off that began last week, after Trump said the reciprocal trade duties he is expected to announce on April 2 would apply globally. Europe’s broad-based Stoxx 600 index was 1.4 per cent lower, while the FTSE 100 lost 0.9 per cent.

Advertisement

“We’re seeing another wave of US-led selling,” said Trevor Greetham, head of multi-asset at Royal London Asset Management. “There’s been no let-up from Trump.”

US technology stocks were hit on Monday, with chipmaker Nvidia’s share price falling 4.8 per cent and Tesla losing 6.6 per cent. The president last week announced a 25 per cent tariff on imports of foreign-made cars and parts, which would affect the electric-car maker.

Consumer-facing companies and other economically sensitive stocks also fared badly, with International Airlines Group down 7.1 per cent and United Airlines dropping 6.7 per cent amid concerns over demand for flights.

Trump’s tariffs threats have also had a big impact on the industrial commodities sector. London-listed Anglo American fell 5.1 per cent, while Glencore lost 3.2 per cent and BHP dropped 3.8 per cent.

“I don’t necessarily see the floor quite yet,” said Sharon Bell, senior equities strategist at Goldman Sachs.

Advertisement

The US investment bank has increased its tariff expectations, while downgrading GDP forecasts for the US and Europe. It is now pricing in a more aggressive 15 per cent reciprocal tariff across Washington’s trading partners, and sees a higher probability of a US recession.

The tariff threat “ups the risk premium that you put on equities” said Bell, although she added that the US stock market has “other issues — some of the DOGE cuts, for example, and the general slowing in the pace of growth”.

Gold surged as high as $3,128 a troy ounce, a fresh record, while US Treasury yields declined, in a sign that investors were piling into safe assets. The 10-year yield, which moves inversely to prices, fell 0.03 percentage points to 4.22 per cent.

The latest moves came after Trump addressed reporters on Air Force One on Sunday, saying on tariffs: “You’d start with all countries, so let’s see what happens.” Last week he had hinted at concessions for some countries.

The US president singled out Asia for its trade practices. “Take a look at trade with Asia. I wouldn’t say anybody has treated us fairly,” he said.

Advertisement

The chaotic rollout of Trump’s aggressive trade agenda has roiled markets and alarmed the US’s trading partners, many of whom have threatened to retaliate.

The US president has said that on Wednesday, which he has dubbed “liberation day”, he will impose levies on any country the White House deems to have an unfair trading relationship with the US.

Charles De Boissezon, global head of equity strategy at Société Générale, said cyclical stocks, whose performance tend to fluctuate with the economy, were suffering. “It is much more the uncertainty overall weighing on investor sentiment,” he said. “The [tariff] announcements keep on changing, but what they have in common is that [they’re] just not good for growth globally.”

The S&P 500 dropped nearly 2 per cent on Friday last week. The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite slid 2.7 per cent as gloomy data on the economy and consumer sentiment raised fears about stagflation.

In Asia on Monday, Japan’s benchmark Topix dropped 3.6 per cent and the exporter-oriented Nikkei 225 slid 4.1 per cent. South Korea’s Kospi fell 3 per cent, while Hong Kong’s Hang Seng retreated 1.3 per cent.

Advertisement

“Many investors are [waiting] for actual tariffs to be announced, unwinding their positions and realising gains,” said Wei Li, head of multi-asset investments for BNP Paribas in China. “This tariff announcement . . . has affected the whole market sentiment.”

The dollar was up 0.3 per cent against a basket of its major trading partners. Having strengthened after Trump’s election on the anticipation of tariffs feeding inflation, the greenback has weakened this year as investors grow more concerned about the impact of the trade war on the US economy.

Continue Reading

News

World braces for impact as Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs take effect on April 2: What to expect? | Today News

Published

on

World braces for impact as Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs take effect on April 2: What to expect? | Today News

US President Donald Trump is set to unveil a sweeping tariff plan on April 2, a date he has branded as “Liberation Day.” The plan, centered around so-called reciprocal tariffs, aims to rebalance global trade, boost American manufacturing, and generate substantial revenue for domestic policy priorities. However, the broad scope of these tariffs, potentially covering all nations, has stoked fears of a global trade war.

A plan without details

Despite the imminent rollout, the White House has not specified the exact tariff rates, how they will be calculated, or which countries might qualify for exemptions. Trump has also hinted that non-tariff barriers will be factored into the calculations, but no methodology has been provided.

“You’d start with all countries, so let’s see what happens,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. “I haven’t heard a rumor about 15 countries, 10 or 15.”

Key sectors and trading partners targeted

The new tariffs will build on existing levies on aluminum, steel, and autos. Trump has also pledged a 25% tariff on imported vehicles, and has suggested increasing tariffs on pharmaceuticals, lumber, semiconductors, and copper. Mexico and Canada, the two largest US trading partners, are expected to be hit with 25% tariffs.

Additionally, Trump has warned of curbs on “all oil coming out of Russia” if Moscow refuses to comply with US demands regarding Ukraine.

Advertisement

April 2, the ‘Liberation Day’ Trump promised

US President Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariff plan, set to begin on April 2, has sent shockwaves through the global economy. Branded as “Liberation Day” by Trump, the policy aims to rebalance trade by imposing tariffs on imports from all nations, unless they negotiate exemptions post-launch. The move, which includes hefty levies on autos, metals, and various other sectors, has sparked fears of a global trade war.

Global reactions

The announcement has triggered concerns among US allies and trading partners, with several governments scrambling to negotiate exemptions or alternative trade arrangements.

UK seeks exemption but braces for impact

The United Kingdom is among the many nations hoping to secure a deal to avoid the tariffs. Downing Street has acknowledged that the UK is “likely to be impacted” and is engaged in ongoing discussions with US trade representatives.

“When it comes to tariffs, the Prime Minister has been clear he will always act in the national interest,” said a spokesperson for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. “Our trade teams are continuing constructive discussions to agree on a UK-US economic prosperity deal.”

However, the UK government has signaled that talks may extend beyond April 2, raising concerns for British industries, particularly luxury car manufacturers like Rolls-Royce and Aston Martin, which face a 25% import duty.

Advertisement

Canada’s energy industry on edge

Canada faces a looming 10% tariff on energy exports to the US, creating unease within the nuclear power sector. The US relies on Canada for over a quarter of its uranium supply, making the tariffs particularly disruptive.

“Utilities are waiting to see what this all means before they take action,” said Karen Radosevich, manager of nuclear fuel supply at Entergy Corp. “This uncertainty is paralyzing for the industry.”

Canadian officials have warned they may retaliate with their own export duties on uranium, potentially escalating trade tensions between the two allies.

EU delays retaliatory measures

The European Union, also in the crosshairs of Trump’s tariff plan, has opted to delay its first countermeasures until mid-April. This decision allows for additional negotiation time and reconsideration of targeted US goods.

Also Read | Explainer: Possible impact of Trumps reciprocal tariffs on India

Russia and Venezuela face additional pressure

Trump has extended his tariff strategy beyond traditional trade disputes, leveraging economic pressure in geopolitical conflicts. On Sunday, he announced a secondary tariff of 25% to 50% on all Russian oil unless Moscow agrees to a ceasefire in Ukraine.

Advertisement

In Venezuela’s case, Trump introduced a new economic tool—”secondary tariffs”—threatening 25% tariffs on any country that purchases Venezuelan oil. The executive order, signed on Monday, gives Secretary of State Marco Rubio discretion to impose these penalties.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro responded defiantly: “They can sanction and impose tariffs on whatever they want, what they cannot sanction is the love and patriotism of the Venezuelan people.”

China, Venezuela’s largest oil buyer, condemned the US move. “We call on the U.S. to stop interfering in Venezuela’s internal affairs and abolish the illegal unilateral sanctions,” said Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun.

Also Read | Trump tariffs shake US markets: S&P 500, Nasdaq hit 6-month low as April 2 nears

Catch all the Business News , Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.

Business NewsNewsUs NewsWorld braces for impact as Donald Trump’s reciprocal tariffs take effect on April 2: What to expect?

MoreLess

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Trump Says He’s ‘Not Joking’ About Seeking a Third Term in Defiance of Constitution

Published

on

Trump Says He’s ‘Not Joking’ About Seeking a Third Term in Defiance of Constitution

President Trump did not rule out seeking a third term in office on Sunday, telling NBC News that he was “not joking” about the possibility and suggesting there were “methods” to circumvent the two-term limit laid out in the Constitution.

In wide-ranging remarks to “Meet the Press,” Mr. Trump said “a lot of people” wanted him to serve a third term, described himself as “pissed off” at President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and vowed to impose tariffs on global rivals, according to a transcript of the interview provided by the network.

“A lot of people want me to do it,” he said to the program’s host, Kristen Welker, about the possibility of a third term. “But we have — my thinking is, we have a long way to go. I’m focused on the current.”

Any attempt to seek a third term would run afoul of the 22nd Amendment, which begins, “No person shall be elected to the office of the president more than twice.”

On Sunday, after the release of the interview, the White House reiterated Mr. Trump’s point that he was focused on his current term, and added that it was “far too early to think about” the idea.

Advertisement

“Americans overwhelmingly approve and support President Trump and his America First policies,” Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement. He added that Mr. Trump was focused on “undoing all the hurt” done by the Biden administration and “Making America Great Again.”

Mr. Trump has often mused about the idea of a third term, particularly in rallies and speeches that have delighted his supporters, though he has often treated it more as a humorous aside. The interview was the first time that Mr. Trump indicated that he was seriously considering the idea, which his allies have continued to amplify. Already he has likened himself to a king, shown an affinity for autocratic leaders and displayed governance tactics constitutional experts and historians have compared to authoritarianism.

Three days after Mr. Trump was sworn in for the second time, Representative Andy Ogles of Tennessee proposed an amendment to the Constitution that would make Mr. Trump eligible for a third term. Such a measure would be extraordinarily difficult: Constitutional amendments require approval by a two-thirds vote of Congress and then the ratification of three-fourths of the states.

In the interview, Ms. Welker noted that she had heard him joke about serving a third term a number of times. Mr. Trump made it clear he considered it a real possibility.

“No, no I’m not joking,” he said. “I’m not joking.”

Advertisement

Ms. Welker asked Mr. Trump whether he had been presented with plans, and he said that he had not — but added that there were “methods which you could do it.”

Ms. Welker suggested one possibility: having Vice President JD Vance at the top of the ticket in 2028, only to pass the office on to Mr. Trump after winning. Mr. Trump acknowledged “that’s one” way it could happen.

“But there are others too,” he said. “There are others.”

Mr. Trump declined to say what those could be.

Derek T. Muller, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame and a scholar in election law, said there has been a dissenting view about the provision of the 22nd Amendment — which focuses on being “elected” president without addressing the idea of ascending to the office. However, he said, such a route would be complicated by the 12th Amendment.

Advertisement

Mr. Muller pointed out that the 12th Amendment states that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of president shall be eligible to that of vice-president of the United States.”

Mr. Muller said he very much doubted that would provide a path to a third term for Mr. Trump.

“You’d have to have so many pieces fall into place for this even to be practically viable, on top of this complicated legal theory,” he said.

In his remarks to Ms. Welker, the president also leveled his strongest criticism to date against Mr. Putin, threatening to impose “secondary tariffs” on Russia’s oil if the country thwarted negotiations on a cease-fire deal with Ukraine that would stop the fighting.

The comments signaled growing impatience with the negotiations. Mr. Trump said that tariffs of 25 to 50 percent on Russian oil could be imposed at “any moment” and that he planned to speak with his Russian counterpart this week.

Advertisement

“If Russia and I are unable to make a deal on stopping the bloodshed in Ukraine, and if I think it was Russia’s fault — which it might not be — but if I think it was Russia’s fault, I am going to put secondary tariffs on oil, on all oil coming out of Russia,” Mr. Trump said.

Mr. Trump has previously referred to secondary tariffs as levies on imports from countries that purchase products from a nation he’s targeted in his foreign policy. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The comments were notable given the steps that Mr. Trump has taken to align himself with Mr. Putin, despite the United States’ support for Ukraine since Russia’s full-scale invasion more than three years ago. Since taking office, Mr. Trump has declined to acknowledge that it was Russia who started the war, falsely declared President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine a “dictator,” but not Mr. Putin, and accused Mr. Zelensky of not wanting peace.

Mr. Trump’s remarks also underscored his increasing promise to use tariffs to compel countries to bend to his domestic and foreign policy goals. In the same phone call, he said he would consider secondary tariffs on Iran if it did not reach a deal with the United States to ensure it did not develop a nuclear weapon, Ms. Welker said.

Mr. Trump told Ms. Welker that he was “very angry, pissed off” at Mr. Putin for questioning the credibility of Mr. Zelensky, and for discussing the prospect of new leadership in that country. Mr. Trump suggested that such comments could set negotiations back, and that they were ”not going in the right location.”

Advertisement

“New leadership means you’re not going to have a deal for a long time, right?” Mr. Trump said.

Russia and Ukraine have agreed to a limited truce, but that has fallen short of the complete pause in combat that Trump administration officials have sought, with Ukraine’s support. The limited cease-fire remains tenuous as Russia seeks more concessions and Ukraine has expressed doubt that a truce would be upheld.

On negotiations about Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Mr. Trump said officials from both countries were “talking,” according to NBC’s account of Ms. Welker’s call with the president, although he raised the prospect of military action if economic and other measures do not succeed.

“If they don’t make a deal,” Mr. Trump said about Iran, “there will be bombing. It will be bombing the likes of which they have never seen before.”

Earlier this month, Mr. Trump sent a letter to Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, urging direct negotiations with the government in Tehran on a deal to curb the country’s advancing nuclear program. The letter said Mr. Trump preferred diplomacy over military action.

Advertisement

Mr. Trump’s raising of secondary tariffs on oil from Russia and Iran was the latest example of the president’s interest in using the prospect of economic pressure on third-party nations.

Last week, he issued an executive order on Monday to crack down on countries that buy Venezuelan oil by imposing tariffs on the goods those nations send into the United States, claiming that Venezuela has “purposefully and deceitfully” sent criminals and murderers into America.

Mr. Trump called the new levies he threatened on buyers of Venezuelan oil “secondary tariffs,” a label that echoed “secondary sanctions” — penalties imposed on other countries or parties that trade with nations under sanctions.

Some trade and sanctions experts said existing secondary sanctions associated with countries such as Russia and Iran already were not well enforced, and questioned whether the United States would have the capacity to pull off new tariff-based penalties.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending