Connect with us

News

Victims of opioid crisis confront owners of OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma | CNN

Published

on

Victims of opioid crisis confront owners of OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma | CNN



CNN
 — 

Victims of opioid abuse and their households on Thursday confronted family members behind OxyContin maker Purdue Pharma, recounting their immeasurable loss and ache attributable to the extremely addictive painkillers.

The emotional listening to got here in the future after a US chapter decide authorized a settlement that requires Purdue Pharma and the Sackler households to pay out as a lot as $6 billion to states, particular person claimants and for opioid disaster abatement.

“I’m outraged that you simply haven’t owned as much as the disaster that you simply’ve created,” stated Kay Scarpone, whose son, Joseph Scarpone, a former Marine, was misplaced to habit when he was 25.

Advertisement

The 26 audio system on the Zoom listening to got here from 19 states, legal professional Arik Preis stated within the court docket.

“You’ll be judged by better powers than this justice system and this chapter court docket,” stated Ryan Hampton, who has been in restoration from a decade-long opioid habit.

“Irrespective of how a lot cash you pay in a settlement or what number of hundreds of thousands your loved ones has spent on their popularity, the legacy of the Sackler household can by no means be modified. You’ll be remembered as what you might be for destroying generations of promise.”

Kristy Nelson performed a recording of the harrowing 911 name she made when she discovered her son useless in his room after an overdose in 2009.

Nelson known as Dr. Richard Sackler – who was a director, co-chairman and president of Purdue Pharma at instances between 1990 via 2018 – the scum of the earth.

Advertisement

“You and your loved ones are not any higher than the heroin sellers on the road nook. The one distinction is you put on a go well with and tie, and deal your heroin in a tablet out of your fancy high-rise places of work or your mansions all through the world,” Nelson stated.

Wendy Olsen, a Wisconsin resident, spoke about her aged father’s habit to Oxycontin after surgical procedure at a hospital – an habit he’s struggled to shake regardless of being a medical physician and a retired US Military veteran.

“It’s essential to me that our testimonial turns into public information to emphasise the truth that this evil tablet conquered not solely a US Military veteran, however a medical physician who was woefully unarmed to guard himself,” Olsen stated.

“He’s proud to inform me simply yesterday that the drug reps tried pushing Oxycontin on his pediatric observe within the 90s. However he refused. A minimum of then he refused. That’s how depraved and highly effective your merchandise’ maintain was … Sackler (household), on every certainly one of us, it doesn’t matter what standing, class or rank.”

Olsen’s son, Danny, briefly gave his perspective on caring for his 88-year-old grandfather.

Advertisement

“What number of grandkids have you learnt have handled a beloved grandparent in withdrawal?” he requested.

Members of the Sackler households have been required to attend the digital listening to. They weren’t allowed to reply when typically offended and tearful households spoke of shattered lives, suicides, careers misplaced, and the haunting cry of a new child in withdrawal.

When the listening to began Thursday morning, the decide affirmed that David Sackler and Theresa Sackler have been on the video convention, with Richard Sackler on the cellphone and watching the video.

The brand new settlement, reached earlier this month after eight states and the District of Columbia appealed a earlier deal, doesn’t present safety to the Sackler households from any prison legal responsibility.

“No settlement will ever come near addressing the magnitude of struggling and hurt attributable to Purdue and the Sackler household,” Connecticut Legal professional Common William Tong stated in a press release Wednesday.

Advertisement

“However in reaching this $6 billion settlement we acknowledged that we couldn’t stall this course of perpetually for victims and our sister states.”

Tong stated Thursday’s listening to will give “victims and survivors the chance to talk on to the Sacklers and share the injury and destruction they’ve brought on.”

“We aren’t accomplished combating for justice in opposition to the habit trade,” Tong stated.

As a part of the deal, the Sackler households will permit any establishment or group nationwide to take away the Sackler identify from bodily amenities and tutorial, medical, and cultural packages, scholarships and endowments as long as the Sacklers are notified first and public statements saying the identify elimination don’t “disparage” the household.

In a pre-drafted assertion, the Sackler households stated they have been “happy to have reached a settlement with extra states that can permit very substantial extra sources to achieve folks and communities in want.”

Advertisement

“The households have constantly affirmed that settlement is by far the easiest way to assist resolve a severe and complicated public well being disaster. Whereas the households have acted lawfully in all respects, they sincerely remorse that OxyContin, a prescription medication that continues to assist folks affected by persistent ache, unexpectedly grew to become a part of an opioid disaster that has introduced grief and loss to far too many households and communities,” it added.

In a press release to CNN final week, Purdue Pharma additionally stated they have been happy with the settlement.

US Chapter Decide Robert Drain tentatively authorized a $6 billion settlement reached final week between Purdue Pharma and the Sackler households with eight states and the District of Columbia.

Drain learn his choice Wednesday throughout a listening to to approve the events’ movement to approve the settlement phrases.

That is an incremental step however there is no such thing as a set finish date for Purdue Pharma’s chapter case.

Advertisement

The last word decision is contingent on the conclusion of the case that also hinges largely on a battle over broad legal responsibility safety for the Sacklers and entities associated to the Sacklers and Purdue Pharma included within the final model of the reorganization plan overturned by a decide. That problem and others nonetheless should be litigated.

CLARIFICATION: This story has been up to date to clarify that Sackler relations may nonetheless be topic to prison legal responsibility.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

Published

on

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

The Pentagon and U.S. Naval Academy are proceeding with actions in support of the Trump administration’s push to eliminate “woke” initiatives throughout the federal government.

The U.S. Naval Academy said it had ended its use of affirmative action in admissions, reversing a policy it previously defended as essential for diversity and national security, according to a federal court filing on Friday. And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s office has ordered the Naval Academy to identify books related to so-called diversity, equity and inclusion themes that are housed in the school’s Nimitz Library, and to remove them from circulation.

This week, according to a defense official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy decisions, Mr. Hegseth’s office became aware that the nation’s military service academies did not believe that President Trump’s Jan. 29 executive order to end “radical indoctrination” in kindergarten through 12th-grade classrooms applied to them, as they are colleges. The defense secretary’s office informed the Naval Academy that Mr. Hegseth’s intent was for the order to apply to the academies, and that the secretary expected compliance.

“The U.S. Naval Academy is fully committed to executing and implementing all directives outlined in executive orders issued by the president and is currently reviewing the Nimitz Library collection to ensure compliance,” said Cmdr. Tim Hawkins, a Navy spokesman. “The Navy is carrying out these actions with utmost professionalism, efficiency, and in alignment with national security objectives.”

The academy’s library in Annapolis, Md., houses roughly 590,000 print books, 322 databases, and more than 5,000 print journals and magazines, Commander Hawkins said.

Advertisement

The court filing on the admissions policy, submitted by the Naval Academy, the Department of Defense, Mr. Hegseth and other officials, states that the Naval Academy changed its admissions policy in February in response to federal directives prohibiting the practice of considering race, ethnicity and sex during the admissions process.

The Naval Academy superintendent issued revised internal guidance on Feb. 14, stating that would not be happening, according to the filing. The superintendent, Vice Admiral Yvette M. David, reaffirmed this change on Wednesday, when she testified before a subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“At no time are race, sex or ethnicity considered in the qualification of a candidate,” she said. The Naval Academy did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the admissions policy on Friday.

Thus far, the review of Nimitz Library’s holdings has identified 900 books that may run afoul of the defense secretary’s verbal order. According to a second defense official, they include “The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr.,” “Einstein on Race and Racism,” and a biography on Jackie Robinson.

Mr. Hegseth is scheduled to visit the Naval Academy on Tuesday and to speak to the Brigade of Midshipmen. It is unclear whether the secretary expects the books to be removed before his arrival.

Advertisement

Defense officials said they were unaware whether the United States Military Academy at West Point, the United States Air Force Academy or the United States Coast Guard Academy had received similar orders, or whether the military’s graduate schools, such as the Naval War College and the Army’s Command and General Staff College, were expected to comply.

Continue Reading

News

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Published

on

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Perhaps there is one simple reason why Donald Trump’s agenda is so hostile to Europe. Trump responds to flattery. Europe offers him almost none.

Even as European leaders sometimes try to massage the world’s most thin-skinned man, their publics make no secret of their contempt. Among voters in France, Germany and Spain, two-thirds say that Trump’s election has made the world less safe. Europe is too rowdy for sycophancy.

Trump surely notices this, just as he surely noticed the balloon of a giant orange baby flown on his state visit to London in 2019. His policies — imposing tariffs, threatening Greenland, shredding climate action, betraying Gaza and Ukraine — could hardly be better targeted as payback.

Advertisement

The temptation for Europeans is to go further: to vent not only at him, but America itself. It’s a short jump from decrying the US president as a dictatorial moron to decrying the public who elected him. In February, Canadian ice-hockey fans booed the US national anthem; “Make America Go Away” has made a great baseball cap. But otherwise, anti-Americanism has been notable by its absence.

Compare this to the years of George W Bush, the president who claimed he was misunderestimated before choking on a pretzel, when Americans were routinely mocked as fat, ignorant and arrogant. New Yorkers on holiday were made to feel personally responsible for war crimes. On the eve of the Iraq war, Europeans joked about the difference between yoghurt and Americans. The punchline: after a while, yoghurt develops some culture. 

The then French president, Jacques Chirac, liked to say that he had a simple principle in foreign affairs: “I see what the Americans are doing and I do the opposite. That way, I’m sure to be right.” How they chuckled. This was the zenith not just of anti-American Islamist terrorism, but of anti-imperialist Latin American populists such as Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales.

But anti-Americanism has changed in 2025. Jokes about nationality don’t land as comfortably now. It’s rightly unfashionable to blame citizens for their governments, especially if the Americans we are most likely to encounter are despairing Democrats. 

Anyway, Netflix and social media have bound us all together. You can’t really dismiss American culture when you choose to consume it daily. Go to Paris today, and see how readily people speak English. Go to London, and puzzle at the number of NFL fans. Judging by JD Vance’s and Pete Hegseth’s Signal messages, the Trump team is more anti-European than Europeans are anti-American.

Advertisement

Those repelled by Elon Musk’s X have moved to another West Coast-based network, Bluesky. European car buyers boycott Tesla but would buy a good American alternative. Just as the most effective takedowns of Bush came from an American filmmaker, Michael Moore, the best critiques of Trump and Musk will probably also come from the US itself. America is both thesis and antithesis. 

Diplomatically too, anti-Americanism doesn’t fit the moment. Trump has reconciled with one regime that was fanatically anti-American under Bush — that is, Putin’s Russia — and even makes sporadic gestures to chavista Venezuela. Europeans are hardly in anti-imperial mood: they want American protection, not withdrawal.

The lesson of the Bush years is that presidential idiocy is temporary. Five and a half years after invading Iraq, America elected Barack Obama as president. Anti-Americanism is akin to amputating your broken leg, instead of waiting for it to heal. 

But if it’s wrong to conflate Americans and their president, it’s wrong to disentangle them entirely. Trump reflects half of America. He reflects a society where a democratic majority is prepared to tolerate mass shootings and a warped political system. America provides so much of the world’s cultural backdrop that we sometimes mistake it for our own country. It is not, even when a Democrat is president. 

Just last spring, during Joe Biden’s presidency, the US was seen unfavourably by at least half the public in Greece, Singapore and Australia, and by more than 40 per cent in Britain and Canada. The next time pollsters ask the question, they will doubtless find record western disillusion. 

Advertisement

Europeans — and Canadians and others — are realising that we have our own values and not long to stand up for them. Boycott Philadelphia cream cheese if it makes you feel better. But most Europeans see that the times are now too serious for knee-jerk anti-Americanism.

Henry Mance is the FT’s chief features writer

Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to receive the FT Weekend newsletter every Saturday morning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Published

on

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Protesters showed up outside a Tesla showroom and service center in the North Hollywood area of Los Angeles on Saturday, March 15, 2025.

Richard Vogel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Richard Vogel/AP

Tesla facilities worldwide have been the target of protests objecting to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s influential role in the Trump administration. This weekend, organizers who have been leading peaceful protests in recent weeks are staging what they hope to be their biggest day yet.

As part of the “Tesla Takedown” campaign, hundreds of nonviolent demonstrations are planned to take place across the U.S. on Saturday. Organizers are calling it a “global day of action” with a goal of 500 protests worldwide.

For weeks, the movement’s organizers have been encouraging people to boycott the EV maker by selling their Tesla cars and stocks. According to Tesla Takedown, thousands of grassroots groups and individuals worldwide are driving the decentralized effort.

Advertisement

Tesla Takedown organizers say the movement is fueled by anger over Musk’s slashing of the federal government, and that it aims to hit the billionaire where it hurts — the electric vehicle company that’s become his main source of wealth.

Joel Lava, who has been helping lead Tesla Takedown protests in Los Angeles, says Musk’s work to dismantle government agencies and workforce through the unofficially named DOGE initiative is the primary motivator for the movement’s members.

“He’s spearheading DOGE, which is spearheading our country’s destruction — literally destroying our country’s infrastructure,” Lava said. “Therefore, we are taking direct aim at his power, which is his wealth, which is Tesla.” 

Musk critics point to a litany of other grievances, including his attacks on diversity, a gesture he made on the Inauguration Day stage that was widely interpreted to be a Nazi salute, and his support for far-right parties.

Musk and the White House did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Since Musk’s political turn, Tesla sales have slumped, and investors have grown uneasy. But market analysts question how much the dip in Tesla sales and shares can be pinned on its CEO’s actions. Tesla has been losing market share to EV competitors for years. And the stock price has fallen in anticipation of auto tariffs. But Trump administration’s recently announced 25% import tariffs on cars made outside the U.S. could give the stock a welcome boost; auto industry analysts say that among domestic carmakers, Tesla will be the least impacted by the tariffs.

Some of the anti-Musk backlash has been violent. Tesla vehicles, dealerships and charging stations across the U.S. and in Europe have been the target of arson and vandalism. Some have taken to spray-painting swastikas on Tesla sedans and Cybertrucks.

Tesla Takedown movement, organizers say its participants are exercising their right to peacefully protest and that they oppose violence and property destruction.

But Musk did not make that distinction when he went after Valerie Costa, a community activist who has helped organize recent peaceful protests in the Seattle area as part of the Tesla Takedown demonstrations.

Musk, in a post on X earlier this month, accused Costa of “committing crimes,” without giving evidence or specific allegations. That was after he claimed that an environmental activist group she cofounded was backed by the ActBlue, a fundraising platform for Democrats.

Advertisement

Costa told NPR that the accusations were false, and that Musk supporters subsequently targeted her in direct messages that included threats of physical violence.

“When one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful person in the world is saying you’ve committed a crime, it doesn’t matter what the truth is,” Costa said.

Tesla Takedown organizers who say they want to chip away at Musk’s power, and that starts with tarnishing Tesla’s brand.

“Trump only likes [Musk] because he’s rich,” Lava, the LA-based organizer, said. “If suddenly Musk becomes just another boring, low-end billionaire, Trump will dump him too, and that will also show the power we have as people to effect change.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending