Connect with us

News

UK to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027

Published

on

UK to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Sir Keir Starmer has announced plans to increase British defence spending from 2.3 per cent of national income to 2.5 per cent by 2027, claiming that the £6bn annual boost was vital to counter the “menace” of Russia.

Starmer told the House of Commons that the extra spending in this parliament would be fully funded by a cut to Britain’s overseas aid budget, admitting the country faced “extremely difficult and painful choices”.

The UK prime minister also set out a longer term ambition to spend 3 per cent of GDP on defence “in the next parliament”, as he prepared to hold talks this week with US President Donald Trump.

Advertisement

Starmer wants to convince Trump that Europe has the will to beef up its own defences, as he seeks to persuade the US to maintain its security guarantee over Europe, including Ukraine.

The Labour leader told MPs on Tuesday that the extra investment would be the “biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the cold war”. Last year Britain spent £53.9bn on defence.

Unlike Trump, Starmer was clear about the provenance of the threat he was seeking to deter: “Russia is a menace in our waters, in our airspace and on our streets.”

“We must change our national security posture, because a generational challenge requires a generational response.”

He announced the £6bn increase in military spending would be funded entirely by reducing the UK’s £15.3bn aid budget from 0.5 per cent of gross national income to 0.3 per cent over the next two years.

Advertisement

The cut echoes the Trump administration’s move to dismantle the US Agency for International Development.

Starmer claimed Britain would be spending £13.4bn more on defence “every year from 2027”, but that claim was denounced as a “misleadingly large figure” by the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

“This figure only seems to make sense if one thinks the defence budget would otherwise have been frozen in cash terms,” said Ben Zaranko, IFS associate director.

Meanwhile, Starmer also set out an ambition to raise defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP “subject to economic and fiscal conditions” during the next parliament — which is expected to run from roughly 2029 to 2034.

The prime minister has long faced calls to spell out when Labour would meet its manifesto commitment to increase defence expenditure from its current level of 2.3 per cent to 2.5 per cent.

Advertisement

The increase in the military budget will cost between £5bn and £6bn a year from 2027 — equivalent to about 10 per cent of the core schools budget in England.

Pressure has ratcheted up in recent weeks after Trump set out his intention to secure a rapid ceasefire in the Ukraine war, and cast doubt over his appetite to continue supplying significant US military support to Europe.

UK military chiefs have privately pushed for the British defence budget to rise further to 2.65 per cent of GDP, which would be £10bn more each year than the current budget.

Starmer said defence spending would rise to 2.6 per cent of GDP after 2027, if expenditure on the UK’s intelligence agencies were included.

Admiral Lord Alan West, former head of the Royal Navy and former Labour security minister, said the most pressing priority was to “sort out the ‘hollowing out’” of UK forces — such as ammunition stocks, missiles and artillery — that has been accelerated by Britain’s donations of military aid to Ukraine.

Advertisement

Earlier on Tuesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called on the government to “repurpose” the aid budget to fund a rise in defence expenditure, and said that spending 2.5 per cent by the end of the decade was “now no longer enough”.

She said in a speech at the London-based Policy Exchange think-tank that she would back Starmer in “taking difficult decisions” to increase defence spending.

Campaigners criticised Starmer’s decision to slash the aid budget to fund the increased defence spending.

Romilly Greenhill, chief executive of Bond, the UK network for NGOs, called the decision “short-sighted and appalling” and said it would have “devastating consequences for millions of marginalised people worldwide” and “weaken our own national security interests”.

The UK aid budget was set at 0.7 per cent of gross national income under former Tory prime minister David Cameron, but reduced to 0.5 per cent by then-chancellor Rishi Sunak during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Advertisement

Sunak, who was later prime minister, had promised to restore it to the higher rate when “fiscal circumstances allowed”.

News

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Published

on

Trump fires last members of election commission, inciting fears of midterm ‘chaos’

Donald Trump has terminated the remaining members of the independent, federal commission that assists election administration officials nationwide just a few months before the midterm elections, multiple outlets reported Thursday.

The remaining three commissioners of the four-member bipartisan commission ⁠were forced out on Thursday in different ways. The one Republican appointee resigned and the other ⁠two, Democratic appointees were notified of their terminations via email from ​the White House presidential personnel office.

“On ‌behalf of President ‌Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position ‌as Commissioner of the Election Assistance Commission is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service,” the email, seen by Reuters, said.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Election Assistance Commission serves as a “national clearinghouse of information on election ‌administration”, accredits testing laboratories and certifies voting systems, and maintains the national mail-voter registration form developed by the National ​Voter Registration Act of 1993, according to the commission’s website. The terminations follow Trump and top administration officials’ advocacy to change vote-by-mail requirements and investigations into the 2020 election outcome, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

Advertisement

“It is ⁠irresponsible and dangerous that this Administration remains dead set on ​causing chaos for ​our election officials across this ​country,” Arizona secretary of state Adrian Fontes said in a ​Thursday statement. “This ‌move undermines the integrity ​of nonpartisan ​election administration.”

The 2002 law that established the commission, the Help America Vote Act, states the president can appoint replacements to the commission.

It is unclear how Trump will move ahead with the commission.

Reuters contributed reporting

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Published

on

Former Olympian pleads not guilty in reflecting pool vandalism charges

Former U.S. Olympian David Hearn (left) walks with his attorney Norman Eisen to speak to reporters and protesters gathered after his arraignment at the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in Washington, D.C. on Thursday.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images


hide caption



toggle caption

Advertisement

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Former U.S. Olympic canoeist David Hearn pleaded not guilty to damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in D.C. Superior Court Thursday morning.

Federal prosecutors charged Hearn with a single count of destruction of property causing more than $1,000 in damage to the pool.

Hearn has previously claimed, which his attorneys repeated during a short press conference outside the court, that he simply touched the water in the pool out of curiosity.

Advertisement

The Trump administration had just completed a $14 million renovation of the pool.

But shortly after the work finished, peeling paint and algae gathered in the water. The remodel has been largely criticized as a massive failure and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Superior Court Judge Carmen McLean released Hearn on his own recognizance. His next hearing is scheduled for Aug. 5.

Norm Eisen, one of Hearn’s attorneys, spoke to reporters outside of court following the hearing. He said the administration is using Hearn as a “scapegoat … for their own failures.”

“It is not a crime to touch the reflecting pool, to touch water in the United States of America,” he said.

Advertisement

Prosecutors say there is a host of evidence against Hearn.

This is a developing story.

Continue Reading

News

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Published

on

Three more people charged with damaging Reflecting Pool after Trump’s multimillion-dollar restoration | CNN Politics

Three more people have been criminally charged with destruction of property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Officers say they detained Cameron Thiers, Sophie Dennison-Gibby and Justin Carreno one Saturday afternoon in June and described in court documents witnessing them peeling and removing pieces of blue paint from the Reflecting Pool.

One officer “witnessed Carreno reach down into the reflecting pool and pull up a piece of the blue paint,” according to the court documents.

The officer who detained Dennison-Gibby “found 1 additional piece of the reflecting pool liner” in her purse, the documents said.

All three incidents were recorded on the officers’ body worn cameras, they said in the court documents.

Advertisement

Several “partnering law enforcement agencies assigned to the Reflecting Pool” working with US Park Police were involved in detaining the two men and one woman — including officers from Texas, Oklahoma, Montana and California.

One of the officers said in court documents that Thiers “admitted to removing a piece of blue sealant from the Reflecting Pool and still had it in his hand when I made contact with him.”

The three defendants were arraigned in court Wednesday and pleaded not guilty to the misdemeanor charges of destruction of property with a value less than $1,000. The judge ordered them to stay away from the Reflecting Pool.

Lawyers for Thiers and Dennison-Gibby declined to comment. CNN has reached out to Carreno’s attorney.

If found guilty of destruction of property, the defendants could be fined up to $1,000 and face a maximum of 180 days behind bars.

Advertisement

The New York Times first reported that three additional people had been charged with damaging the Reflecting Pool.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed that vandals caused major damage to the pool by gashing the lining after his administration spent more than $14 million on renovations, though he has not provided evidence to support that claim. The officers who charged Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby did not accuse them of gashing the lining.

Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was indicted by a grand jury in Washington, DC, last week for allegedly damaging the Reflecting Pool. Hearn — unlike Carreno, Thiers and Dennison-Gibby – was charged with destruction of property with a value of more than $1,000 which carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison, if convicted. He is set to be arraigned in court Thursday.

Crews began draining the Reflecting Pool over the weekend to make repairs, according to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, for the second time in three months.

The move comes after weeks of problems – algae blooms, green-hued water, a chipping bottom and the administration’s allegations of vandalism – that have plagued the iconic landmark, making its woes the subject of national interest.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending