Connect with us

News

UK questioned US ‘control’ over its Iraq tactics one year into invasion

Published

on

UK questioned US ‘control’ over its Iraq tactics one year into invasion

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The UK government questioned the US’s control of its military operations in Iraq 13 months into the war, newly revealed documents show, highlighting the Blair government’s frustrations with its most important ally.

The documents, released by the Cabinet Office on Tuesday, contained internal briefings prepared for then prime minister Tony Blair that raised concerns over whether the US had a grip on its invasion tactics.

“The prime minister may wish to question Bush on whether there is proper political control of military operations,” the documents said.

Advertisement

The briefings, which came ahead of a meeting with President George W Bush on April 16, 2004, also showed that Britain believed that “too many military officers [were] talking tough to a US audience”.

The revelations lay bare the UK government’s growing frustrations with the US after the onset of the first battle of Fallujah on April 4, which resulted in an Iraqi insurgent victory. 

Blair’s decision to join the US-led invasion of Iraq damaged his approval ratings and led pressure to build up within the party for him to resign. In 2007, Blair stepped down as Labour leader after 10 years as prime minister.

A separate document from the UK embassy in Washington sent to Number 10 after the first week of the battle revealed that then-US deputy secretary of state, Richard Armitage, had told the British ambassador that Bush had wanted to “kick some ass” in Fallujah.

But, it added, “faced with a dose of reality” that his actions may bring down the Iraqi government, Bush had been forced to back down. 

Advertisement

The paper said Armitage believed that Bush “still thought he was on some sort of mission from God in Iraq” and expressed his view that the US was “gradually losing on the battlefield” and there was “no coherent strategy” to operations. 

© TNA: PREM49/3786

He then urged the British to reason with Bush that the United Nations must play an important role in the establishment of a political process in the country. 

Ahead of his meeting with Bush, Blair was briefed by officials that Fallujah “did not show US planning at its best”, with American tactics “clumsy” and their “public pronouncements [having] raised the temperature”, worsening the situation. 

The British hoped to get private agreement in the meeting that the US approach “needed to be more measured” as it was “losing political capital” for both governments.  

The documents also reveal that UK officials believed that US coalition management had “never been good” since the beginning of the war.

Advertisement

Papers noted that the US believed the Polish, Spanish and Ukrainian governments had “let the side down”. The British also expressed their own frustrations with Ukraine for a perceived lack of support of the war effort.

President George W. Bush, right, and British Prime Minister Tony Blair answer questions from the media during a news conference in the Rose Garden of the White House on April 16, 2004.
Tony Blair and George W Bush in the Rose Garden at the White House in April 2004 © Roger L. Wollenberg/UPI/Alamy

The “coalition of the willing” had been formed in early 2003 ahead of the decision to invade Iraq on March 20. At its peak, it included 49 countries.

The documents came ahead of the planned political transition on June 30, in which the Iraqi interim government took control of the country from the established governing council.

The conflict eventually concluded in 2011 after a lengthy insurgency from militant groups following the fall of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in 2003.

The Cabinet Office and Armitage declined to comment.

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading

News

Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified

Published

on

Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified

Crime scene tape surrounds a bicycle in front of St. Lukes Episcopal Church in Atlanta on May 14, 2026. (SKYFOX 5)

The woman stabbed to death on the Beltline has been identified as 23-year-old Alyssa Paige, according to the Fulton County Medical Examiner.

The backstory:

Advertisement

Paige was killed by a 21-year-old man Thursday afternoon while she was on the Beltline. Officials confirmed to FOX 5 that the stabbing happened near the 1700 block of Flagler Avenue NE.

Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum said the department was alerted around 12:10 p.m. that a woman had been stabbed just north of the Montgomery Ferry Drive overpass. She was rushed to Grady Memorial Hospital where she later died. Another person was also stabbed during the incident, but their condition remains unknown.

According to officers, the man responsible attacked a U.S. Postal worker prior to the stabbing before getting away on a bike. He then used that bike to flee the scene of the stabbing as well.

Advertisement

The suspect was arrested near St. Luke’s Episcopal Church on Peachtree Street in Midtown around 5:25 p.m. 

What we don’t know:

Advertisement

While officials haven’t released an official motive, they noted the man may have been suffering a mental health crisis.

The Source: Information in this article came from the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s Office and previous FOX 5 reporting. 

AtlantaCrime and Public SafetyNewsInstastories
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending