Connect with us

News

UK admissions of overseas tax evasion jump 22%

Published

on

UK admissions of overseas tax evasion jump 22%

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The number of people in the UK who admitted not paying tax on their overseas assets jumped by nearly a quarter in 2023-24, according to government data.

A total of 5,643 people admitted not paying enough tax on their foreign assets to HM Revenue & Customs, up from 4,630 in 2022-23 — a rise of 22 per cent — data obtained under a freedom of information request showed.

The government has promised to raise billions of pounds by clamping down on tax evasion and avoidance, with HMRC given funding for 5,000 extra compliance officers in the Budget.

Advertisement

Tax experts said the surge in evasion disclosures had been driven by several factors. These included HMRC sending out a greater number of warning letters, receiving data from more countries on people’s offshore affairs and an increase in public awareness about its data sharing.

“HMRC’s aggressive pursuit of tax avoiders now leaves very few places to hide,” said Graham Caddock, tax investigations director at Lubbock Fine, the advisory firm that issued the FOI request.

He added that the tax authority was “making good use of the information it receives from overseas jurisdictions, checking tax return entries and . . . its database to look for those who are avoiding HMRC altogether”.

Since 2018, international rules have led to the automatic exchange of information on financial accounts between tax authorities. These agreements, developed by the OECD and known as the Common Reporting Standard (CRS), have been signed by 120 countries.

Participant nations include popular tax havens such as Switzerland, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands and the Cayman Islands. Meanwhile, from 2027, the information sharing programme will be extended to include crypto asset exchanges.

Advertisement

HMRC uses algorithms to identify anomalies between the offshore data records and its data on UK residents. The system then generates “nudge letters” that are sent to individuals when discrepancies are detected.

Dawn Register, tax dispute resolution partner at BDO, an accountancy firm, said she suspected the information HMRC is now receiving is “more accurate and subject to greater analysis . . . using sophisticated AI technology”.

This greater analytic power was likely to be one of the factors driving an increase in tax disclosures.

“Awareness and education around CRS and tax reporting has encouraged more people to come forward and bring their UK tax affairs up to date,” she added.

Individuals can disclose unpaid tax on foreign assets using HMRC’s online worldwide disclosure facility.

Advertisement

The maximum penalty for failing to disclose offshore income can be up to 200 per cent of tax owed and in the most serious cases carries a prison sentence.

Coming forward to make a disclosure after receiving a nudge letter, “significantly reduced” the risk of penalties, said Caddock.

HMRC’s estimates that the tax gap — the difference between what it expected to collect in tax and what is paid — was £39.8bn in 2022-23, with about £5.5bn likely to have been lost specifically to evasion.

HMRC estimated, in data published earlier this year, that the under-declared tax liability of UK-resident individuals with foreign income was about £300mn in 2018-19. The analysis found that about 4 per cent of this group had under-declared their tax liability to HMRC.

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

Published

on

Supreme Court is death knell for Virginia’s Democratic-friendly congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The U.S. Supreme Court refused Friday to allow Virginia to use a new congressional map that favored Democrats in all but one of the state’s U.S. House seats. The map was a key part of Democrats’ effort to counter the Republican redistricting wave set off by President Trump.

The new map was drawn by Democrats and approved by Virginia voters in an April referendum. But on May 8, the Supreme Court of Virginia in a 4-to-3 vote declared the referendum, and by extension the new map, null and void because lawmakers failed to follow the proper procedures to get the issue on the ballot, violating the state constitution.

Virginia Democrats and the state’s attorney general then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to put into effect the map approved by the voters, which yields four more likely Democratic congressional seats. In their emergency application, they argued the Virginia Supreme Court was “deeply mistaken” in its decision on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the Nation.” Further, they asserted the decision “overrode the will of the people” by ordering Virginia to “conduct its election with the congressional districts that the people rejected.”

Advertisement

Republican legislators countered that it would be improper for the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into a purely state law controversy — especially since the Democrats had not raised any federal claims in the lower court.

Ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court sided with Republicans without explanation leaving in place the state court ruling that voided the Democratic-friendly maps.

The court’s decision not to intervene was its latest in emergency requests for intervention on redistricting issues. In December, the high court OK’d Texas using a gerrymandered map that could help the GOP win five more seats in the U.S. House. In February, the court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map, adopted to offset Texas’s map. Then in March, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the redrawing of a New York map expected to flip a Republican congressional district Democratic.

And perhaps most importantly, in April, the high court ruled that a Louisiana congressional map was a racial gerrymander and must be redrawn. That decision immediately set off a flurry of redistricting efforts, particularly in the South, where Republican legislators immediately began redrawing congressional maps to eliminate long established majority Black and Hispanic districts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

Published

on

Explosion at Lumber Mill in Searsmont, Maine, Draws Large Emergency Response

An explosion and fire drew a large emergency response on Friday to a lumber mill in the Midcoast region of Maine, officials said.

The State Police and fire marshal’s investigators responded to Robbins Lumber in Searsmont, about 72 miles northeast of Portland, said Shannon Moss, a spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Public Safety.

Mike Larrivee, the director of the Waldo County Regional Communications Center, said the number of victims was unknown, cautioning that “the information we’re getting from the scene is very vague.”

“We’ve sent every resource in the county to that area, plus surrounding counties,” he said.

Footage from the scene shared by WABI-TV showed flames burning through the roof of a large structure as heavy, dark smoke billowed skyward.

Advertisement

The Associated Press reported that at least five people were injured, and that county officials were considering the incident a “mass casualty event.”

Catherine Robbins-Halsted, an owner and vice president at Robbins Lumber, told reporters at the scene that all of the company’s employees had been accounted for.

Gov. Janet T. Mills of Maine said on social media that she had been briefed on the situation and urged people to avoid the area.

“I ask Maine people to join me in keeping all those affected in their thoughts,” she said.

Representative Jared Golden, Democrat of Maine, said on social media that he was aware of the fire and explosion.

Advertisement

“As my team and I seek out more information, I am praying for the safety and well-being of first responders and everyone else on-site,” he said.

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Continue Reading

News

Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified

Published

on

Woman killed in Atlanta Beltline stabbing identified

Crime scene tape surrounds a bicycle in front of St. Lukes Episcopal Church in Atlanta on May 14, 2026. (SKYFOX 5)

The woman stabbed to death on the Beltline has been identified as 23-year-old Alyssa Paige, according to the Fulton County Medical Examiner.

The backstory:

Advertisement

Paige was killed by a 21-year-old man Thursday afternoon while she was on the Beltline. Officials confirmed to FOX 5 that the stabbing happened near the 1700 block of Flagler Avenue NE.

Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum said the department was alerted around 12:10 p.m. that a woman had been stabbed just north of the Montgomery Ferry Drive overpass. She was rushed to Grady Memorial Hospital where she later died. Another person was also stabbed during the incident, but their condition remains unknown.

According to officers, the man responsible attacked a U.S. Postal worker prior to the stabbing before getting away on a bike. He then used that bike to flee the scene of the stabbing as well.

Advertisement

The suspect was arrested near St. Luke’s Episcopal Church on Peachtree Street in Midtown around 5:25 p.m. 

What we don’t know:

Advertisement

While officials haven’t released an official motive, they noted the man may have been suffering a mental health crisis.

The Source: Information in this article came from the Fulton County Medical Examiner’s Office and previous FOX 5 reporting. 

AtlantaCrime and Public SafetyNewsInstastories
Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending