Connect with us

News

Taiwan’s military has a problem: As China fears grow, recruitment pool shrinks | CNN

Published

on

Taiwan’s military has a problem: As China fears grow, recruitment pool shrinks | CNN


Taipei, Taiwan
CNN
 — 

Taiwan has seen a gap in its protection plans that’s steadily getting greater. And it’s not one simply plugged by boosting the finances or shopping for extra weapons.

The island democracy of 23.5 million is going through an growing problem in recruiting sufficient younger males to satisfy its navy targets and its Inside Ministry has urged the issue is – at the least partially – resulting from its stubbornly low beginning price.

Taiwan’s inhabitants fell for the primary time in 2020, in accordance with the ministry, which warned earlier this yr that the 2022 navy consumption can be the bottom in a decade and {that a} continued drop within the youth inhabitants would pose a “enormous problem” for the long run.

Advertisement

That’s dangerous information at a time when Taiwan is making an attempt to bolster its forces to discourage any potential invasion by China, whose ruling Communist Occasion has been making more and more belligerent noises about its willpower to “reunify” with the self-governed island – which it has by no means managed – by power if needed.

And the outlook has darkened additional with the discharge of a brand new report by Taiwan’s Nationwide Improvement Council projecting that by 2035 the island can anticipate roughly 20,000 fewer births per yr than the 153,820 it recorded in 2021. By 2035, Taiwan will even overtake South Korea because the jurisdiction with the world’s lowest beginning price, the report added.

Such projections are feeding right into a debate over whether or not the federal government ought to improve the interval of necessary navy service that eligible younger males should serve. At present, the island has an expert navy power made up of 162,000 (as of June this yr) – 7,000 fewer than the goal, in accordance with a report by the Legislative Yuan. Along with that quantity, all eligible males should serve 4 months of coaching as reservists.

Altering the necessary service requirement can be a serious U-turn for Taiwan, which had beforehand been making an attempt to chop down on conscription and shortened the necessary service from 12 months as lately as 2018. However on Wednesday, Taiwan’s Minister of Nationwide Defence Chiu Kuo-cheng stated such plans can be made public earlier than the tip of the yr.

That information has met with opposition amongst some younger college students in Taiwan, who’ve voiced their frustrations on PTT, Taiwan’s model of Reddit, even when there may be help for the transfer among the many wider public.

Advertisement

A ballot by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Basis in March this yr discovered that almost all Taiwanese agreed with a proposal to elongate the service interval. It discovered that 75.9% of respondents thought it cheap to increase it to a yr; solely 17.8% have been opposed.

Many specialists argue there may be merely no different choice.

Su Tzu-yun, a director of Taiwan’s Institute for Nationwide Protection and Safety Analysis, stated that earlier than 2016, the pool of males eligible to affix the navy – both as profession troopers or as reservists – was about 110,000. Since then, he stated, the quantity had declined yearly and the pool would possible be as little as 74,000 by 2025.

And inside the subsequent decade, Su stated, the variety of younger adults accessible for recruitment by the Taiwanese navy might drop by as a lot as a 3rd.

“This can be a nationwide safety problem for us,” he stated. “The inhabitants pool is reducing, so we’re actively contemplating whether or not to renew conscription to satisfy our navy wants.

Advertisement

“We are actually going through an growing menace (from China), and we have to have extra firepower and manpower.”

Taiwan’s low beginning price – 0.98 – is way under the two.1 wanted to keep up a steady inhabitants, however it’s no outlier in East Asia.

In November, South Korea broke its personal world report when its beginning price dropped to 0.79, whereas Japan’s fell to 1.3 and mainland China hit 1.15.

Even so, specialists say the pattern poses a novel downside for Taiwan’s navy, given the relative measurement of the island and the threats it faces.

China has been making more and more aggressive noises towards the island since August, when then-US Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi controversially visited Taipei. Not lengthy after she landed in Taiwan, Beijing additionally launched a collection of unprecedented navy workout routines across the island.

Advertisement

Since then, the temperature has remained excessive – significantly as Chinese language chief Xi Jinping advised a key Communist Occasion assembly in October that “reunification” was inevitable and that he reserves the choice of taking “all measures needed.”

Chang Yan-ting, a former deputy commander of Taiwan’s air power, stated that whereas low beginning charges have been widespread throughout East Asia, “the state of affairs in Taiwan may be very completely different” because the island was going through “an increasing number of stress (from China) and the state of affairs will develop into extra acute.”

“The US has navy bases in Japan and South Korea, whereas Singapore doesn’t face an acute navy menace from its neighbors. Taiwan faces the best menace and declining beginning price will make the state of affairs much more critical,” he added.

Roy Lee, a deputy government director at Taiwan’s Chung-hua Establishment for Financial Analysis, agreed that the safety threats going through Taiwan have been higher than these in the remainder of the area.

“The state of affairs is tougher for Taiwan, as a result of our inhabitants base is smaller than different nations going through comparable issues,” he added.

Advertisement

Taiwan’s inhabitants is 23.5 million, in comparison with South Korea’s 52 million, Japan’s 126 million and China’s 1.4 billion.

Apart from the shrinking recruitment pool, the decline within the youth inhabitants might additionally threaten the long-term efficiency of Taiwan’s economic system – which is itself a pillar of the island’s protection.

Taiwan is the world’s twenty first largest economic system, in accordance with the London-based Centre for Economics and Enterprise Analysis, and had a GDP of $668.51 billion final yr.

A lot of its financial heft comes from its main function within the provide of semiconductor chips, which play an indispensable function in all the pieces from smartphones to computer systems.

Taiwan’s homegrown semiconductor big TSMC is perceived as being so invaluable to the worldwide economic system – in addition to to China – that it’s generally known as forming a part of a “silicon defend” towards a possible navy invasion by Beijing, as its presence would give a powerful incentive to the West to intervene.

Advertisement

Lee famous that inhabitants ranges are intently intertwined with gross home product, a broad measure of financial exercise. A inhabitants decline of 200,000 folks might end in a 0.4% decline in GDP, all else being equal, he stated.

“It is extremely tough to extend GDP by 0.4%, and would require a variety of effort. So the truth that a declining inhabitants can take away that a lot development is large,” he stated.

Taiwan’s authorities has introduced in a collection of measures aimed toward encouraging folks to have infants, however with restricted success.

It pays dad and mom a month-to-month stipend of 5,000 Taiwan {dollars} (US$161) for his or her first child, and a better quantity for every extra one.

Since final yr, pregnant ladies have been eligible for seven days of depart for obstetrics checks previous to giving beginning.

Advertisement

Outdoors the navy, within the wider economic system, the island has been encouraging migrant staff to fill job vacancies.

Statistics from the Nationwide Improvement Council confirmed that about 670,000 migrant staff have been in Taiwan on the finish of final yr – comprising about 3% of the inhabitants.

Many of the migrant staff are employed within the manufacturing sector, the council stated, the overwhelming majority of them from Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines.

Lee stated in the long run the Taiwanese authorities would possible must reform its immigration insurance policies to herald extra migrant staff.

Nonetheless, there are those that say Taiwan’s low beginning price isn’t any motive to panic, simply but.

Advertisement

Alice Cheng, an affiliate professor in sociology at Taiwan’s Academia Sinica, cautioned towards studying an excessive amount of into inhabitants traits as they have been affected by so many elements.

She identified that just some a long time in the past, many demographers have been warning of meals shortages brought on by a inhabitants explosion.

And even when the low beginning price endured, that may be no dangerous factor if it have been a mirrored image of an enchancment in ladies’s rights, she stated.

“The academic enlargement that occurred within the 70s and 80s in East Asia dramatically modified ladies’s standing. It actually pushed ladies out of their houses as a result of that they had data, training and profession prospects,” she stated.

“The subsequent factor you see globally is that after ladies’s training stage improved, fertility charges began declining.”

Advertisement

“All these East Asian nations are actually scratching their head and making an attempt to consider insurance policies and interventions to spice up fertility charges,” she added.

“But when that’s one thing that basically, (ladies) don’t need, are you able to push them to do this?”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Donald Trump’s cabinet picks: key players in the president-elect’s administration

Published

on

Donald Trump’s cabinet picks: key players in the president-elect’s administration

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Donald Trump has moved quickly to name candidates for the top jobs in his incoming administration. The picks show that loyalty appears to have been a crucial criteria for a post — and in many cases, the president-elect’s picks have shocked Washington’s political establishment.

Many of the nominees could face gruelling Senate confirmation hearings in the new year before they are confirmed, but here is a handy guide to those likely to be among the most powerful players in the second Trump White House.

Marco Rubio

Secretary of state

Florida senator Marco Rubio, 53, is set to become America’s chief diplomat in Trump’s second administration. Rubio, a former political rival to Trump, is known for his hawkish views on China and Iran — and is not as isolationist as some other Trump allies.

Advertisement

Pete Hegseth

Secretary of defence
Pete Hegseth

Pete Hegseth is a 44-year-old army veteran and Fox News host with no government experience who has been asked to lead an organisation with almost 3mn military and civilian employees. Hegseth’s views of the US military align with Trump’s instincts, including rooting out “socially correct garbage”.

Susie Wiles

White House chief of staff
Susie Wiles

Trump’s first decision after winning the 2024 presidential election was to pick his campaign manager, Susie Wiles, as chief of staff. Wiles, 67, is a seasoned Republican campaign operative who has established herself inside Trump’s orbit, in part by keeping the public spotlight on others.

John Ratcliffe

CIA director
John Ratcliffe

John Ratcliffe, 59, director of national intelligence in the final year of Trump’s first term, is a staunch ally who sharply criticised special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election when he was a congressman.

Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy

Government efficiency
Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy

Elon Musk, 53, and Vivek Ramaswamy, 39, are being put in charge of a promised effort to slash rules, bureaucracy and spending throughout government. They will lead a yet to be established “department of government efficiency”.

Mike Waltz

National security adviser
Mike Waltz

Mike Waltz, 50, is a decorated military veteran, Nato critic and China sceptic. The Florida congressman and retired Army Special Forces officer has called China an “existential” threat. He served several tours in Afghanistan, the Middle East and Africa.

Kristi Noem

Homeland security secretary
Kristi Noem

Governor of South Dakota Kristi Noem, 52, has been nominated to lead the Department of Homeland Security with a mandate to stem immigration. Her autobiography, which recounted how she shot her puppy Cricket for misbehaviour, became a national talking point earlier this year.

Tom Homan

Border tsar
Tom Homan

Tom Homan, 62, previously served as Trump’s immigration and customs enforcement director, backing the policy of separating parents from their children to discourage irregular migration. He has been asked to crack down on undocumented immigrants crossing the US-Mexico border and deport those already in the US.

Elise Stefanik

US ambassador to UN

Republican New York congresswoman Elise Stefanik, 40, is a former White House aide to George W Bush who rose to prominence for questioning the presidents of Harvard University and the University of Pennsylvania about antisemitism on their campuses, leading to their resignations.

Mike Huckabee

US ambassador to Israel
Mike Huckabee

Mike Huckabee, 69, is the former governor of Arkansas and a prominent evangelical Christian. He is adored by the Israeli right for unflinching support of Israel’s military campaigns in Gaza and Lebanon, and his support for their desire to annex the occupied West Bank.

Stephen Miller

Deputy chief of staff for policy
Stephen Miller

Stephen Miller is among the most vocal and influential immigration hawks in Trump’s inner circle. The appointment of the 39-year-old will put the conservative firebrand and longtime adviser at the heart of the president-elect’s effort to reduce illegal immigration.

Tulsi Gabbard

Director of national intelligence
Tulsi Gabbard

The former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii is known for her pro-Russian views, including blaming Nato and President Joe Biden’s administration for Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Tulsi Gabbard, 43, ran for president in 2020 from the far left of the Democratic party but has since embraced Trump and the Republicans.

Matt Gaetz

Attorney-general
Matt Gaetz,

The nomination of Republican congressman Matt Gaetz, 42, to run the Department of Justice has stunned Washington. Gaetz, a loyal Trump backer, was previously under investigation by the House of Representatives for alleged ethics breaches. Trump wants him to overhaul the department in retaliation for criminal investigations launched against the president-elect.

Robert F Kennedy Jr

Health secretary
Robert F Kennedy Jr,

Robert F Kennedy Jr, known as RFK, dropped his independent presidential campaign in August and backed Trump despite coming from the Democratic dynasty. Trump said he would allow 70-year-old Kennedy, a vocal vaccine sceptic and critic of the pharmaceutical industry, to “go wild” in reforming the US health and food system.

Reporting by Alex Rogers, Lauren Fedor, Oliver Barnes and Sophie Spiegelberger

Continue Reading

News

Why the White House hasn't benefited much from investing in infrastructure

Published

on

Why the White House hasn't benefited much from investing in infrastructure

U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg at the Baltimore and Potomac Tunnel North Portal in January 2023 in Baltimore. The tunnel, which is more than 150 years old, will be replaced with funds from the bipartisan infrastructure law.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

WASHINGTON — Three years after President Biden signed the bipartisan infrastructure law, his administration has a new name for it: the “Big Deal.”

It is, indisputably, a lot of money: more than a trillion dollars in spending on roads, bridges, airports, railroads, ports and more.

But for all that investment, the White House has seen surprisingly little political benefit.

Advertisement

“You know, I don’t think it did,” said Ray LaHood, a Republican who served as Transportation Secretary during the Obama administration. “I was shocked.”

During the first Trump administration, infrastructure week became a running joke in Washington. President Biden took it seriously, betting that voters would reward his administration for delivering where others had not.

But this month, that bet fell flat with voters, who didn’t seem to give his Democratic party much credit.

“The most important thing is that the projects actually get done,” said Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg in an interview at the Department of Transportation this week. “From the point of view of the country, it is more important that they get done than it is who gets the credit.”

For the past three years, Buttigieg has spent much of his time on the road, attending ribbon cuttings and ground-breakings for projects all over the country. The DOT has announced $570 billion in funding from the infrastructure law for over 66,000 projects in all 50 states — from $400 million to shore up the Golden Gate Bridge, to $1 million for a new terminal at a tiny airport in Chamberlain, South Dakota.

Advertisement

YouTube

“It’s everything from these backyard projects to the cathedrals of American infrastructure,” Buttigieg said.

In noting the anniversary on Friday, President Biden called the law, “the largest investment in our nation’s infrastructure in a generation,” he said in a post on X. “On that day, we showed we can get big things done when we work together.”

Advertisement

So why haven’t these investments resonated more with voters?

Part of the issue, Buttigieg argues, is timing. “Some of these projects can be done quickly, but many of them, by their very nature, are projects that take the better part of a decade,” he said. “So it will be a long time before ribbons are cut.”

There are some other theories about why the message didn’t cut through. Mark Zandi, the chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, calls the infrastructure law a “slam dunk success,” but says voters were more concerned about inflation.

“People are paying a lot more for groceries and rent and gasoline than they were a few years ago. So no matter what you did that was good,” Zandi said, “it just gets drowned out by the reality of higher inflation.”

There’s also a theory that the infrastructure law wasn’t ambitious enough.

Advertisement

“These investments are not producing the sorts of results that would get people excited,” said Beth Osborne, the director of the non-profit Transportation For America, which recently released a report on the climate effects of the infrastructure law.

“We are told that it’s going to bring down emissions, but we just released a report that showed it did not do that,” Osborne said.

There’s yet another theory that the Biden and Kamala Harris campaigns just didn’t talk enough about the infrastructure law and the jobs it’s already created.

“I think there should’ve been a lot more focus on the infrastructure bill, on the jobs. I think it would have resonated with voters,” said LaHood, the former transportation secretary who also served as a Congressman from Illinois. “There’s a lot of people working, there’s a lot of orange cones on the highway.”

Back in 2021, 19 Republicans in the Senate and 13 in the House supported the infrastructure law. But many more voted against it, arguing it was overstuffed with too many pet projects.

“This bill, this $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill, isn’t true infrastructure,” said Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) in an interview on FOX.

Two years later, Mace was happy to celebrate funding for a new public transit hub in her district.

Advertisement

“What do you want me to do? Turn my back on the Low Country, when we can get funding for public transit? Absolutely not,” she said at a press conference for the project.

Mace wasn’t the only Republican who voted against the infrastructure law only to cheer its accomplishments later. That was sometimes frustrating to watch, said Transportation Secretary Buttigieg. And he expects it to keep happening.

“I think we’re about to have an entire administration doing that because of course, the President-elect also opposed this infrastructure package. But will, I’m sure, not hesitate to celebrate things that are done because of it,” Buttigieg said.

The DOT is doing everything it can to speed up the grantmaking process to make sure money continues to flow to these projects, Buttigieg said. He worries that the Trump administration could try to claw back some of the money in future years, but hopes it won’t come to that.

“I still believe the jobs that are being created and the infrastructure being improved is so beneficial to so many people that it is going to be hard for ideologues to do away with these good efforts,” Buttigieg said. “That’s why it was bipartisan in the first place.”

Advertisement

Buttigieg argues that the legacy of this infrastructure law will be felt for decades to come. But others worry that the political lessons may linger as well.

“It’s going to be hard to do anything big,” said LaHood.

“We need better infrastructure. We should continue to invest,” said economist Mark Zandi. “But that’s going to be hard to do politically because lawmakers are seeing what’s happening here and they’re not getting credit for it.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Donald Trump picks Robert Kennedy Jr to run US health department

Published

on

Donald Trump picks Robert Kennedy Jr to run US health department

Donald Trump has nominated vaccine sceptic and former Democrat Robert F Kennedy Jr as head of the US Department of Health and Human Services, the latest in a series of controversial picks for top cabinet jobs.

The appointment will put Kennedy, who sowed doubts about Covid-19 vaccines and has been critical of the pharmaceutical industry, in charge of a department with a $1.8tn budget with wide-ranging influence over drug regulation and public health.

The move hit the stock market, as investors digested the prospect of tougher political outlook in the world’s biggest pharmaceutical market. US-listed vaccine makers including Moderna and BioNTech both closed down over 5 per cent on Thursday. On Friday European pharma groups fell, with GSK and Sanofi losing more than 3 per cent.

Trump said in a statement on Thursday that he was “thrilled” to nominate Kennedy to the role. “For too long, Americans have been crushed by the industrial food complex and drug companies who have engaged in deception, misinformation, and disinformation when it comes to Public Health,” the president-elect said.

Donald Trump welcomes Kennedy on stage during a campaign rally in Glendale, Arizona, in August © Olivier Touron/AFP/Getty Images

Trump has roiled Washington in recent days with a series of controversial cabinet nominations, raising questions about how many will make it through the Senate approval process. On Wednesday, he tapped loyalists Matt Gaetz as attorney-general and Tulsi Gabbard to be director of national intelligence.

Advertisement

Trump said that as head of HHS, with oversight of agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Protection, Kennedy would “restore these Agencies to the traditions of Gold Standard Scientific Research, and beacons of Transparency, to end the Chronic Disease epidemic, and to Make America Great and Healthy Again!”

During the final weeks of his presidential election campaign Trump had said he would “let [Kennedy] go wild on health, go wild on the food . . . go wild on medicines”. Drugmakers had expressed concern about the possibility of Kennedy being given a formal role in the administration.

Thanking Trump for his nomination, Kennedy wrote on X: “I look forward to working with the more than 80,000 employees at HHS to free the agencies from the smothering cloud of corporate capture so they can pursue their mission to make Americans once again the healthiest people on Earth.”

The Consumer Brands Association, whose members include Nestlé and PepsiCo, noted that the agencies within HHS “operate under a science and risk-based mandate and it is critical that framework remains under the new administration”.

Kennedy, the son of the late attorney-general Robert Kennedy, beat a number of other candidates for the job, including former housing secretary and neurosurgeon Ben Carson and ex-Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal, according to a person close to discussions.

Advertisement
Robert F. Kennedy Carrying Son Robert Kennedy Jr.
A young Kennedy being carried by his father © Bettmann Archive

The nomination repays Kennedy for dropping his own campaign for the presidency and backing Trump instead, helping to deliver votes for the former president, the person said.

Kennedy’s nomination as the country’s top health official is likely to spark alarm among public health experts and pharmaceutical groups. He has described the Covid-19 jab as “the deadliest vaccine ever made” and last year said the virus was “ethnically targeted” to spare Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese people.

Democrat Senator Ron Wyden, chair of the Senate finance committee, said after the announcement that Kennedy’s “outlandish views on basic scientific facts are disturbing and should worry all parents who expect schools and other public spaces to be safe for their children”.

Bill Cassidy, the top Republican on the Senate health committee, praised the pick, and said Kennedy “championed issues like healthy foods and the need for greater transparency in our public health infrastructure”.

Kennedy has said he would reorient government resources to tackle chronic disease instead of spending money on prescription drugs, as well as floating the idea of removing fluoride from the water system and to take on food companies over the additives in food.

In an interview with NBC News last week, Kennedy insisted that “if vaccines are working for somebody, I’m not going to take them away. People ought to have choice.” But he added that he would remove “entire departments” of the FDA.

Advertisement

Kennedy’s appointment sets the stage for some of his allies to be appointed to other health agencies, such as the FDA, CDC and the National Institutes of Health. Healthcare influencers and entrepreneur siblings Calley and Casey Means, who are advising Kennedy, as well as Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya, who opposed the widescale rollout of Covid-19 vaccines, have been jockeying for positions, according to a person close to discussions.

Health officials from Trump’s former administration, including Joe Grogan, Eric Hargan and Paul Mango, are also in the running for roles.

Trump also said on Thursday that he would name North Dakota governor Doug Burgum as secretary of the interior, giving the billionaire businessman a powerful role in the incoming administration’s efforts to boost domestic energy production.

Additional reporting by Gregory Meyer

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending