Connect with us

News

Taiwan’s military has a problem: As China fears grow, recruitment pool shrinks | CNN

Published

on

Taiwan’s military has a problem: As China fears grow, recruitment pool shrinks | CNN


Taipei, Taiwan
CNN
 — 

Taiwan has seen a gap in its protection plans that’s steadily getting greater. And it’s not one simply plugged by boosting the finances or shopping for extra weapons.

The island democracy of 23.5 million is going through an growing problem in recruiting sufficient younger males to satisfy its navy targets and its Inside Ministry has urged the issue is – at the least partially – resulting from its stubbornly low beginning price.

Taiwan’s inhabitants fell for the primary time in 2020, in accordance with the ministry, which warned earlier this yr that the 2022 navy consumption can be the bottom in a decade and {that a} continued drop within the youth inhabitants would pose a “enormous problem” for the long run.

Advertisement

That’s dangerous information at a time when Taiwan is making an attempt to bolster its forces to discourage any potential invasion by China, whose ruling Communist Occasion has been making more and more belligerent noises about its willpower to “reunify” with the self-governed island – which it has by no means managed – by power if needed.

And the outlook has darkened additional with the discharge of a brand new report by Taiwan’s Nationwide Improvement Council projecting that by 2035 the island can anticipate roughly 20,000 fewer births per yr than the 153,820 it recorded in 2021. By 2035, Taiwan will even overtake South Korea because the jurisdiction with the world’s lowest beginning price, the report added.

Such projections are feeding right into a debate over whether or not the federal government ought to improve the interval of necessary navy service that eligible younger males should serve. At present, the island has an expert navy power made up of 162,000 (as of June this yr) – 7,000 fewer than the goal, in accordance with a report by the Legislative Yuan. Along with that quantity, all eligible males should serve 4 months of coaching as reservists.

Altering the necessary service requirement can be a serious U-turn for Taiwan, which had beforehand been making an attempt to chop down on conscription and shortened the necessary service from 12 months as lately as 2018. However on Wednesday, Taiwan’s Minister of Nationwide Defence Chiu Kuo-cheng stated such plans can be made public earlier than the tip of the yr.

That information has met with opposition amongst some younger college students in Taiwan, who’ve voiced their frustrations on PTT, Taiwan’s model of Reddit, even when there may be help for the transfer among the many wider public.

Advertisement

A ballot by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Basis in March this yr discovered that almost all Taiwanese agreed with a proposal to elongate the service interval. It discovered that 75.9% of respondents thought it cheap to increase it to a yr; solely 17.8% have been opposed.

Many specialists argue there may be merely no different choice.

Su Tzu-yun, a director of Taiwan’s Institute for Nationwide Protection and Safety Analysis, stated that earlier than 2016, the pool of males eligible to affix the navy – both as profession troopers or as reservists – was about 110,000. Since then, he stated, the quantity had declined yearly and the pool would possible be as little as 74,000 by 2025.

And inside the subsequent decade, Su stated, the variety of younger adults accessible for recruitment by the Taiwanese navy might drop by as a lot as a 3rd.

“This can be a nationwide safety problem for us,” he stated. “The inhabitants pool is reducing, so we’re actively contemplating whether or not to renew conscription to satisfy our navy wants.

Advertisement

“We are actually going through an growing menace (from China), and we have to have extra firepower and manpower.”

Taiwan’s low beginning price – 0.98 – is way under the two.1 wanted to keep up a steady inhabitants, however it’s no outlier in East Asia.

In November, South Korea broke its personal world report when its beginning price dropped to 0.79, whereas Japan’s fell to 1.3 and mainland China hit 1.15.

Even so, specialists say the pattern poses a novel downside for Taiwan’s navy, given the relative measurement of the island and the threats it faces.

China has been making more and more aggressive noises towards the island since August, when then-US Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi controversially visited Taipei. Not lengthy after she landed in Taiwan, Beijing additionally launched a collection of unprecedented navy workout routines across the island.

Advertisement

Since then, the temperature has remained excessive – significantly as Chinese language chief Xi Jinping advised a key Communist Occasion assembly in October that “reunification” was inevitable and that he reserves the choice of taking “all measures needed.”

Chang Yan-ting, a former deputy commander of Taiwan’s air power, stated that whereas low beginning charges have been widespread throughout East Asia, “the state of affairs in Taiwan may be very completely different” because the island was going through “an increasing number of stress (from China) and the state of affairs will develop into extra acute.”

“The US has navy bases in Japan and South Korea, whereas Singapore doesn’t face an acute navy menace from its neighbors. Taiwan faces the best menace and declining beginning price will make the state of affairs much more critical,” he added.

Roy Lee, a deputy government director at Taiwan’s Chung-hua Establishment for Financial Analysis, agreed that the safety threats going through Taiwan have been higher than these in the remainder of the area.

“The state of affairs is tougher for Taiwan, as a result of our inhabitants base is smaller than different nations going through comparable issues,” he added.

Advertisement

Taiwan’s inhabitants is 23.5 million, in comparison with South Korea’s 52 million, Japan’s 126 million and China’s 1.4 billion.

Apart from the shrinking recruitment pool, the decline within the youth inhabitants might additionally threaten the long-term efficiency of Taiwan’s economic system – which is itself a pillar of the island’s protection.

Taiwan is the world’s twenty first largest economic system, in accordance with the London-based Centre for Economics and Enterprise Analysis, and had a GDP of $668.51 billion final yr.

A lot of its financial heft comes from its main function within the provide of semiconductor chips, which play an indispensable function in all the pieces from smartphones to computer systems.

Taiwan’s homegrown semiconductor big TSMC is perceived as being so invaluable to the worldwide economic system – in addition to to China – that it’s generally known as forming a part of a “silicon defend” towards a possible navy invasion by Beijing, as its presence would give a powerful incentive to the West to intervene.

Advertisement

Lee famous that inhabitants ranges are intently intertwined with gross home product, a broad measure of financial exercise. A inhabitants decline of 200,000 folks might end in a 0.4% decline in GDP, all else being equal, he stated.

“It is extremely tough to extend GDP by 0.4%, and would require a variety of effort. So the truth that a declining inhabitants can take away that a lot development is large,” he stated.

Taiwan’s authorities has introduced in a collection of measures aimed toward encouraging folks to have infants, however with restricted success.

It pays dad and mom a month-to-month stipend of 5,000 Taiwan {dollars} (US$161) for his or her first child, and a better quantity for every extra one.

Since final yr, pregnant ladies have been eligible for seven days of depart for obstetrics checks previous to giving beginning.

Advertisement

Outdoors the navy, within the wider economic system, the island has been encouraging migrant staff to fill job vacancies.

Statistics from the Nationwide Improvement Council confirmed that about 670,000 migrant staff have been in Taiwan on the finish of final yr – comprising about 3% of the inhabitants.

Many of the migrant staff are employed within the manufacturing sector, the council stated, the overwhelming majority of them from Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines.

Lee stated in the long run the Taiwanese authorities would possible must reform its immigration insurance policies to herald extra migrant staff.

Nonetheless, there are those that say Taiwan’s low beginning price isn’t any motive to panic, simply but.

Advertisement

Alice Cheng, an affiliate professor in sociology at Taiwan’s Academia Sinica, cautioned towards studying an excessive amount of into inhabitants traits as they have been affected by so many elements.

She identified that just some a long time in the past, many demographers have been warning of meals shortages brought on by a inhabitants explosion.

And even when the low beginning price endured, that may be no dangerous factor if it have been a mirrored image of an enchancment in ladies’s rights, she stated.

“The academic enlargement that occurred within the 70s and 80s in East Asia dramatically modified ladies’s standing. It actually pushed ladies out of their houses as a result of that they had data, training and profession prospects,” she stated.

“The subsequent factor you see globally is that after ladies’s training stage improved, fertility charges began declining.”

Advertisement

“All these East Asian nations are actually scratching their head and making an attempt to consider insurance policies and interventions to spice up fertility charges,” she added.

“But when that’s one thing that basically, (ladies) don’t need, are you able to push them to do this?”

News

How a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump

Published

on

How a Major Democratic Law Firm Ended Up Bowing to Trump

Since President Trump’s first term, Brad S. Karp, the chairman of the law firm Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, championed himself as a bulwark against what he saw as an unlawful and unpredictable presidency.

Mr. Karp, who has a long history of fund-raising for Democrats, sought to unite major law firms in “a call to arms” to fight Mr. Trump in court on issues like his administration’s policy of separating migrant children from their parents. He publicly said lawyers were obligated to defend the rule of law.

He hosted a “Lawyers for Biden” fund-raiser in 2023, and one of his top partners prepared Vice President Kamala Harris for her debates with Mr. Trump.

So it was not surprising that Mr. Trump targeted Paul Weiss with an executive order last week that created a potential existential threat for the firm, although the order was legally dubious and undercut fundamental principles of the justice system. In response, Mr. Karp began discussions with another big firm about presenting a unified and bipartisan front and challenging the order in court.

But on Wednesday, Mr. Karp walked into the Oval Office around 8:30 a.m., leaving behind the adversarial approach.

Advertisement

Now, he wanted to make a deal.

A day later, Mr. Trump announced that Mr. Karp had agreed to pledge $40 million in pro bono legal services to issues the president has championed, including a task force being run by the Justice Department aimed at combating antisemitism “and other mutually agreed projects.”

The White House said the firm had committed to stop using diversity, equity and inclusion policies. And Mr. Trump said Mr. Karp had acknowledged to him that a former partner of the firm who had worked as a prosecutor in Manhattan and had pushed for Mr. Trump to be charged criminally had committed “wrongdoing.” These assertions appear inconsistent with a copy of the statement that Mr. Karp shared with his firm.

In deciding to bend to Mr. Trump, Mr. Karp likely saved his law firm, which had $2.63 billion in revenue last year and represents corporate clients like Exxon Mobil and Apollo Global Management, from hemorrhaging clients and lawyers.

But in doing so, Mr. Karp, who had positioned himself as a spokesman and advocate for the legal profession, left other firms even more vulnerable to Mr. Trump’s retribution campaign by demonstrating that his intimidation tactics could lead even a powerhouse like Paul Weiss to make public concessions, according to interviews with lawyers at other firms and legal experts.

Advertisement

In fact, a White House official said on Friday that despite the deal reached with Paul Weiss, Mr. Trump would continue to target law firms with executive orders, including some the president could sign as early as next week.

In the Oval Office on Friday, Mr. Trump asserted that law firms “did bad things” and had attacked him “ruthlessly, violently, illegally.” But now, he said, they “want to make deals.”

Mr. Karp’s decision left many in the legal world, including some in his own firm, reeling, concerned that other firms would now face a choice between bowing to Mr. Trump or abandoning their principles or political beliefs to avoid financial calamity.

Before reaching the deal, Mr. Karp, who has led Paul Weiss for nearly two decades, talked to some of the firm’s 200 partners to weigh their options, according to three people with knowledge of the matter. The group decided to seek a meeting with Mr. Trump to try and reach a deal, rather than engage in what could be a drawn-out legal battle, the people said. Those people and others who spoke for this story did so on the condition of anonymity to talk about discussions that were supposed to remain private.

Some of the firm’s corporate partners were particularly adamant that the firm should not sue the administration, the people said. That put them at odds with other partners who work on high-profile litigation and had been arguing that the firm should fight, some of whom expressed displeasure internally on Friday that Mr. Karp had settled, according to four people familiar with the matter.

Advertisement

The deal, while supported by the vast majority of the firm’s partners, also drew swift condemnation from lawyers outside the firm and critics of Mr. Trump.

And while many of the firm’s clients were relieved by the deal, some senior lawyers at large financial institutions began to privately express dismay, two people with knowledge of the matter said. Some of these lawyers suggested they would consider pulling business from the firm.

Mr. Trump has put law firms at the center of his efforts to seek revenge against enemies real and perceived, especially those linked to any efforts to investigate him or hold him legally accountable.

Before targeting Paul Weiss, Mr. Trump had issued executive orders imposing penalties on two other firms, Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie. Last week a federal judge barred the order against Perkins Coie from going into effect on the grounds that it would likely be found to be illegal.

Many within the legal community had hoped that Mr. Karp, with his firm’s resources, would fight Mr. Trump in court as aggressively as did Perkins Coie, which was targeted by a nearly identical executive order earlier this month.

Advertisement

Paul Weiss employs many prominent Democrats and has expressed pride in its long history at the forefront of the fight for civil rights. It has trumpeted how it was the first major New York City firm to have Jewish and non-Jewish lawyers working alongside each other, to hire a Black associate and to have a female partner.

According to two people briefed on the matter, it initially appeared that Mr. Karp was headed down the path of suing Mr. Trump’s administration.

Last week, a federal judge in Washington temporarily barred enforcement of the executive order Mr. Trump had directed at Perkins Coie, saying, “It sends little chills down my spine” to hear arguments that a president can punish individuals and companies like this.

The judge’s decision relieved many in the legal community by suggesting that the courts would serve as a check against Mr. Trump and that the big firms would not have to confront him directly.

But two days after that decision, Mr. Trump signed a nearly identical executive order against Paul Weiss. That action deeply unnerved the big firms by showing that Mr. Trump would not be deterred by the courts. And it demonstrated that he was willing to try to target firms that had years-old ties to lawyers on his enemies list, like Mark F. Pomerantz, a former Paul Weiss partner. Mr. Pomerantz had tried to build a criminal case against Mr. Trump several years ago while working at the Manhattan district attorney’s office.

Advertisement

The executive order against Paul Weiss barred the firm from dealing with the government and suggested that clients of the firm could lose their government contracts. Those provisions were intended to drive business away from Paul Weiss, which employs more than 1,000 lawyers and has offices around the world.

Last Saturday and Sunday, Mr. Karp began discussions with William Burck, the co-managing partner of the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, about Mr. Burck joining Paul Weiss in bringing a court challenge against Mr. Trump’s order, people familiar with the talks said.

The discussions with Mr. Burck were notable given that Mr. Burck is one of the few lawyers at a major firm that represents the Trump Organization. He has also helped some of Mr. Trump’s nominees through their confirmation process. And bringing Paul Weiss together with Quinn Emanuel would signal to the industry that firms across the partisan divide were coming together to address what they saw as an all-out assault on their business.

Earlier this month, Mr. Burck declined to represent Perkins Coie, believing that it was not worth taking on Mr. Trump to help that firm. But with Mr. Trump undeterred by the judge’s ruling in the Perkins Coie case and moving against another firm, Mr. Burck agreed to help Paul Weiss and put his firm’s name on the suit against Mr. Trump.

At the same time, Mr. Karp weighed another possibility. With the help of Mr. Burck and other Trump-friendly contacts Mr. Karp had in the business world, Mr. Karp sought to determine whether it would be possible to cut a deal with Mr. Trump to resolve his firm’s problems.

Advertisement

Mr. Karp, whose firm has represented the N.F.L., had the New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, an ally of Mr. Trump’s, reach out to the president.

Mr. Burck began working the phones to the White House, reaching out to officials to signal that Mr. Karp was open to making a deal. During those conversations, Mr. Burck concluded that one of the White House’s biggest issues with Paul Weiss and other big firms was that they had refused to represent clients like Mr. Trump on the right — especially after the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the Capitol — whom they viewed as politically unsavory.

Mr. Burck relayed to the White House that Paul Weiss was willing to make some sort of public statement that they would represent clients no matter their political views.

Two days later, Mr. Trump called Mr. Karp and invited him to come to the White House. The following day, Mr. Karp went to visit Mr. Trump, where they met in the Oval Office for three hours. Mr. Trump’s adviser on negotiations, Steve Witkoff, joined the meeting, which was cordial, and both sides believed they had a potential framework for a deal.

At the same time, there was pressure on Mr. Karp. The lawyers at his firm who were preparing to sue Mr. Trump wanted to go to court as soon as possible, concerned that a judge might not give them a temporary restraining order because they waited too long.

Advertisement

In the day that followed, proposed language went back and forth between the White House, Mr. Burck and Mr. Karp.

Pursuing a deal represented a stark shift for Mr. Karp, who until recently was helping to marshal support for Perkins Coie. Mr. Karp was among the prominent lawyers working behind the scenes to persuade other law firms to sign a friend of the court brief on behalf of Perkins Coie, according to four people with knowledge of the matter. It is now unclear whether the brief — which was drafted by Donald B. Verrilli Jr., a solicitor general during the Obama administration and a partner at Munger Tolles & Olson — will be filed.

The ordeal with Mr. Trump came at a personally trying time for Mr. Karp, who had suffered a heart attack just a few months earlier and was still easing his way back into his normally frenetic work schedule of nonstop meetings and client calls.

On Thursday evening, Mr. Karp sent a firm-wide email justifying the decision, writing that he had really just “reaffirmed” the firm’s statement of principles outlined in 1963 by one of Paul Weiss’s original named partners, Judge Simon H. Rifkind.

“Thank you all for your patience during this time,” Mr. Karp told the staff at the firm. “With this behind us, we can devote our complete focus — as we always do — to our clients, our work, our colleagues and our firm.”

Advertisement

But it was a bitter pill for some to swallow as lawyers knew the outside world would view the deal as capitulating to Mr. Trump, especially at a time when other institutions, like universities and media companies, have begun to settle with Mr. Trump rather than fight, infuriating and demoralizing Mr. Trump’s critics.

George Conway, a conservative lawyer and frequent critic of Mr. Trump, posted on social media, “This Paul Weiss capitulation is the most disgraceful action by a major law firm in my lifetime, so appalling that I couldn’t believe it at first.”

By the time Mr. Trump made his announcement on Thursday, there were already signs that Paul Weiss had been burned in making a deal with Mr. Trump.

The copy of the agreement that Mr. Karp shared with Paul Weiss differed in some ways from Mr. Trump’s characterization of the deal in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social.

Although Mr. Trump said the law firm had specifically agreed to not follow any diversity, equity and inclusion policies in its hiring practices, there is no reference to D.E.I. in the agreement that Mr. Karp shared. Mr. Trump has mounted an aggressive campaign against diversity initiatives in the federal government, labeling it as a form of workplace discrimination.

Advertisement

There also was no mention of Mr. Pomerantz, the former Paul Weiss partner, in the copy of the agreement circulated by Mr. Karp. Five people briefed on the matter said Mr. Karp said he did not criticize Mr. Pomerantz with the president, in spite of Mr. Trump’s assertion to the contrary.

In a statement issued on Thursday evening, Mr. Pomerantz denied he had done anything wrong.

Jonah E. Bromwich and William K. Rashbaum and Tyler Pager contributed reporting, and Sheelagh McNeill contributed research.

Continue Reading

News

Wang Chuanfu, the BYD founder with a battery obsession

Published

on

Wang Chuanfu, the BYD founder with a battery obsession

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

From a certain perspective, this might have seemed like a rocky week for electric car maker BYD and its metallurgist-turned-billionaire founder Wang Chuanfu.

China’s rival to Tesla, which recently raised nearly $6bn to fund ambitious global expansion plans, is facing crises on three continents. Its plans for a multimillion-dollar factory in Mexico are drawing opposition from both the Mexican government and senior officials in Beijing worried about tech leakage.

Meanwhile BYD’s Hungary plant, key to unlocking the lucrative European market, is being investigated by Brussels. And in Brazil, local labour officials have accused the company of “slavery”-like conditions for workers building a factory in the north-eastern Bahia state.

Advertisement

Yet all of these problems paled beside BYD’s launch on Monday of a new battery charging system able to add driving range of about 470km in five minutes — a fraction of the time it takes a Tesla to add range.

For the 58-year-old Wang, this achievement takes him one step closer to his long-held vision of homegrown Chinese technology conquering the global market.

Investors, too, appear so far happy to regard overseas problems as growing pains that will not derail BYD. It has targeted sales of more than 5mn cars this year, including 1mn overseas, while also developing its energy storage business. The group’s Hong Kong-traded shares have retreated from a record high but are up more than 50 per cent this year.

Wang is “much more of a disrupter than many had expected”, says Ilaria Mazzocco, an expert on Chinese cleantech industrial policy at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. “He’s an empire builder: people should think about him in the same category as Bezos or Musk,” she adds.  

Born in 1966 in the eastern province of Anhui, Wang is part of a generation of Chinese entrepreneurs who escaped poverty to join the nation’s newly minted billionaire class, benefiting from Deng Xiaoping’s opening of China to the world and the ascent of the city of Shenzhen into a high-tech manufacturing powerhouse.

Advertisement

After his siblings toiled for years to fund their younger brother’s education, Wang moved to Shenzhen and co-founded BYD as a battery company in the mid-1990s, leveraging his academic background in chemistry and metallurgy to produce lithium batteries and other components for then mobile phone kings Nokia and Motorola.

Wang’s obsession with batteries led to a pivot to vehicles in the early 2000s. Cracking the five-minute charge this week builds on his pioneering “cell-to-body” technology — sandwiching a battery cell inside a vehicle’s structure.

Neil Beveridge, a senior analyst at Bernstein in Hong Kong, says the new charging system is the fastest on the market and, if it is widely adopted, “should put an end” to the range anxiety cited by consumers as a key reason not to embrace electric cars.

The latest battery advancement follows the release of a new driver-assistance system known as “God’s Eye” and lower sales at rival Tesla following Elon Musk’s foray into US politics. Together this could help BYD take a larger share of what EY estimates will be $660bn in annual revenue opportunities from the shift to EVs by 2030.

The company’s stock rally has also taken Wang’s personal net worth, according to Bloomberg data, to just shy of $30bn, making him one of China’s richest men. Despite that he remains a workaholic who lives humbly. His house is walking distance from BYD’s main factories and he dispatches lieutenants to public-facing events unless his attendance is absolutely necessary.

Advertisement

Underlings have long described Wang as a restrained, highly detail-orientated micromanager. His approval was once sought for a business unit to distribute fruit to team members.

But his passion for batteries has revealed a performative flare. To demonstrate to an investor just how safe his battery cells are, he has drunk battery electrolyte fluid. He has reused cells after trucks drove over them and frequently shows visitors batteries being penetrated by nails.

The release of the God’s Eye system in February reflects an important shift in his leadership. For years Wang, referred to internally only as “the chairman”, resisted following in the footsteps of rivals who were pouring money into driverless software development.

Now that assisted driving features are becoming a key selling point with Chinese consumers, younger BYD engineers are slowly gaining more of a voice within the company — driving a change in strategy.

Still, questions remain about whether BYD’s business model, so successful in China, can be exported abroad. BYD’s vertical integration — controlling supply chains from the lithium mines to factories — has been pivotal in producing low-cost cars. So has access to China’s migrant labour force and Beijing’s support for cleantech champions.

Advertisement

But in international markets, Wang must contend with a lack of subsidies, new supply chains, higher labour and environmental standards and deepening western fears over Chinese technological dominance.  

Still, Mark Greeven, professor of innovation and strategy at IMD China, says that the company’s speed, scale and supply chain control is likely to rock the global trade system. “I wonder is it that BYD is not ready for the world?” he said. “Or is the world not ready for BYD?”

edward.white@ft.com

Continue Reading

News

Homeland Security makes cuts to civil rights and immigration oversight offices

Published

on

Homeland Security makes cuts to civil rights and immigration oversight offices

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem speaks to staff at DHS headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 28.

Manuel Balce Ceneta/Pool/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Manuel Balce Ceneta/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

The Department of Homeland Security is cutting jobs in the oversight divisions focused on civil rights as a part of a broader reduction in force effort across the federal government.

The affected offices, confirmed by DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, are the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), the Office of the Immigration Detention Ombudsman and the Office of the Citizenship and Immigration Services Ombudsman.

“These offices have obstructed immigration enforcement by adding bureaucratic hurdles and undermining [the department’s] mission,” McLaughlin said in a statement. “Rather than supporting law enforcement efforts, they often function as internal adversaries that slow down operations.”

Advertisement

The two ombudsman offices provide oversight of the DHS immigration portfolio. This includes detention, by working with those detained who face issues with Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), to help resolve issues with those seeking immigration-related benefits.

“DHS remains committed to civil rights protections but must streamline oversight to remove roadblocks to enforcement,” McLaughlin said. “These reductions ensure taxpayer dollars support the Department’s core mission: border security and immigration enforcement.”

Across the government, federal agencies have announced their plans for job cuts as directed by the White House. The latest round of firings, which were first reported by Bloomberg, come after an initial round in February focusing primarily on the other parts of the agency that do not handle immigration enforcement. At that time, 405 DHS workers were laid off across cybersecurity, disaster response and science and technology. USCIS lost under 50 employees.

Last week, ahead of the cuts, the Democratic ranking members of Senate Homeland and Governmental Affairs Committee and the Judiciary Committee, which primarily oversee immigration issues, sent a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem warning against cuts to the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Office, noting that its role is “statutorily-required.”

“A decision to eliminate the CRCL office or make significant reductions in CRCL staff will jeopardize DHS’s ability to comply with statutory requirements and to protect the civil rights and civil liberties of the American people,” wrote Sens. Gary Peters, D-Mich., and Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending