Connect with us

News

Sitting too much is bad for your health, but offsetting the impact is easy, study shows | CNN

Published

on

Sitting too much is bad for your health, but offsetting the impact is easy, study shows | CNN



CNN
 — 

Positive, you’ve heard the risks of sitting all day, however with most jobs there isn’t a lot you are able to do about it, proper?

Not in line with a brand new examine, which appeared into the impacts of extended sitting.

5 minutes of sunshine strolling each half hour can assist alleviate a few of the elevated threat that comes with sitting for lengthy stretches of the day, in line with the examine printed Thursday within the journal of the American Faculty of Sports activities Medication.

The scientific group has recognized for many years that sitting can enhance threat of power ailments like diabetes, coronary heart illness and sure varieties of cancers, stated Keith Diaz, the examine’s lead creator and assistant professor of behavioral drugs at Columbia College Medical Heart. However till now there haven’t been clear pointers about how lengthy you’ll be able to sit and the way usually try to be transferring.

Advertisement

“We’ve recognized for most likely a couple of decade now that sitting will increase your threat for many power ailments and will increase your threat for early demise,” stated Diaz, who can also be director of the Train Testing Laboratory on the college’s Heart for Behavioral Cardiovascular Well being. “Identical to how a lot vegatables and fruits they need to eat and the way a lot train they need to do, we have to give (individuals) particular steerage on how you can fight the harms of sitting.”

The stroll may be as gentle as 1.9 miles per hour, which is slower than most individuals stroll usually, Diaz stated. The aim is to only break up the sitting with some motion.

A number of well being markers had been measured for various mixtures of intervals spent sitting and strolling for this examine. Though the pattern measurement was small, the examine was rigorous with sturdy methodology, stated Matthew Buman, director of the Faculty of Well being Options at Arizona State College. Buman was not concerned within the examine,

Scientists don’t but know precisely why sitting is so dangerous, however the working concept is that muscle mass are vital in regulating issues like blood sugar and levels of cholesterol. However once you sit for too lengthy, your muscle mass don’t have the chance to contract and function optimally, Diaz stated.

Does 5 minutes each half hour nonetheless appear to be a stretch? Even little “exercise snacks” like one minute of strolling each hour was proven to cut back blood stress in examine individuals by a “sizable quantity,” Diaz stated.

Advertisement

And all of the individuals within the examine had been typically wholesome adults, which means that these with power circumstances might even see a good better profit, Buman stated.

Even with clearer pointers, transferring frequently should still appear unattainable if workplace tradition doesn’t advertise.

“There are such a lot of of us who lead inactive or sitting-based existence or have sitting-based jobs,” Diaz stated. “There are these social norms the place in case you are up out of your desk, individuals assume you’re not working.”

Diaz has been working to persuade employers of the significance of transferring through the workday – not just for particular person well being, however for the underside line, too.

Advertisement

“Sitting is an occupational hazard and a wholesome worker is a extra productive worker,” he stated.

The crew discovered that there have been extra than simply bodily well being advantages for individuals who broke up their sitting. Additionally they discovered that it lowered fatigue and improved temper, Diaz stated.

“Simply sitting at your desk and grinding away for 8 hours really is probably not all that nice for those who’re simply involved in regards to the backside line about your work productiveness,” he added.

And though standing desks are widespread, they is probably not the reply.

“I’m undecided there’s actually strong scientific proof that standing is admittedly any higher than sitting,” Diaz stated. “I fear that folks have this false sense that they’re wholesome as a result of they’re utilizing this desk, and perhaps they’re not really that significantly better.”

Advertisement

Join CNN’s Health, However Higher publication sequence. Our seven-part information will show you how to ease right into a wholesome routine, backed by consultants.

What Diaz actually desires individuals to remove from the analysis is that getting sufficient motion is achievable.

Shifting doesn’t should imply leaving your desk if that’s not in your office tradition, stated CNN health contributor Dana Santas, a mind-body coach for skilled athletes.

The latest analysis solely appeared on the effectiveness of strolling, however Santas stated there are different methods to maneuver your muscle mass frequently.

“You may merely apply field squats by getting up and sitting again down gently then popping proper again up once more and repeating that movement time and again,” Santas stated by way of electronic mail.

Advertisement

In case you do have the chance to get more room, Santas likes to suggest a dance break.

“Since most songs common at the least 3 minutes, you’ll be able to dance off the detrimental influence of an excessive amount of sitting. And, as a bonus — dancing to your favourite tunes can even enhance your temper!” she stated.

For individuals with restricted mobility or who use wheelchairs, there are nonetheless accessible methods to interrupt up sedentary instances.

Everybody ought to stretch out and transfer arms in all instructions, Santas stated. And somebody in a wheelchair can do stretches, sidebends and twisting workouts from the chair, she added.

“Even when you’ll be able to’t transfer your decrease physique and really stand up from sitting, actively taking deep breaths that use your diaphragm and transfer your ribs, is useful on your posture and general well being,” Santas stated.

Advertisement

“The general message is to maneuver in as some ways which can be potential based mostly in your talents,” Buman stated.

The bar for motion doesn’t should be excessive, Diaz added. “To the extent you could break up your sitting with some sort of motion breaks, you’re nonetheless going to yield some profit,” he stated.

News

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

Published

on

Naval Academy Takes Steps to End Diversity Policies in Books and Admissions

The Pentagon and U.S. Naval Academy are proceeding with actions in support of the Trump administration’s push to eliminate “woke” initiatives throughout the federal government.

The U.S. Naval Academy said it had ended its use of affirmative action in admissions, reversing a policy it previously defended as essential for diversity and national security, according to a federal court filing on Friday. And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s office has ordered the Naval Academy to identify books related to so-called diversity, equity and inclusion themes that are housed in the school’s Nimitz Library, and to remove them from circulation.

This week, according to a defense official who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss policy decisions, Mr. Hegseth’s office became aware that the nation’s military service academies did not believe that President Trump’s Jan. 29 executive order to end “radical indoctrination” in kindergarten through 12th-grade classrooms applied to them, as they are colleges. The defense secretary’s office informed the Naval Academy that Mr. Hegseth’s intent was for the order to apply to the academies, and that the secretary expected compliance.

“The U.S. Naval Academy is fully committed to executing and implementing all directives outlined in executive orders issued by the president and is currently reviewing the Nimitz Library collection to ensure compliance,” said Cmdr. Tim Hawkins, a Navy spokesman. “The Navy is carrying out these actions with utmost professionalism, efficiency, and in alignment with national security objectives.”

The academy’s library in Annapolis, Md., houses roughly 590,000 print books, 322 databases, and more than 5,000 print journals and magazines, Commander Hawkins said.

Advertisement

The court filing on the admissions policy, submitted by the Naval Academy, the Department of Defense, Mr. Hegseth and other officials, states that the Naval Academy changed its admissions policy in February in response to federal directives prohibiting the practice of considering race, ethnicity and sex during the admissions process.

The Naval Academy superintendent issued revised internal guidance on Feb. 14, stating that would not be happening, according to the filing. The superintendent, Vice Admiral Yvette M. David, reaffirmed this change on Wednesday, when she testified before a subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“At no time are race, sex or ethnicity considered in the qualification of a candidate,” she said. The Naval Academy did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the admissions policy on Friday.

Thus far, the review of Nimitz Library’s holdings has identified 900 books that may run afoul of the defense secretary’s verbal order. According to a second defense official, they include “The Autobiography of Martin Luther King Jr.,” “Einstein on Race and Racism,” and a biography on Jackie Robinson.

Mr. Hegseth is scheduled to visit the Naval Academy on Tuesday and to speak to the Brigade of Midshipmen. It is unclear whether the secretary expects the books to be removed before his arrival.

Advertisement

Defense officials said they were unaware whether the United States Military Academy at West Point, the United States Air Force Academy or the United States Coast Guard Academy had received similar orders, or whether the military’s graduate schools, such as the Naval War College and the Army’s Command and General Staff College, were expected to comply.

Continue Reading

News

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Published

on

Anti-Americanism is a mug’s game

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Perhaps there is one simple reason why Donald Trump’s agenda is so hostile to Europe. Trump responds to flattery. Europe offers him almost none.

Even as European leaders sometimes try to massage the world’s most thin-skinned man, their publics make no secret of their contempt. Among voters in France, Germany and Spain, two-thirds say that Trump’s election has made the world less safe. Europe is too rowdy for sycophancy.

Trump surely notices this, just as he surely noticed the balloon of a giant orange baby flown on his state visit to London in 2019. His policies — imposing tariffs, threatening Greenland, shredding climate action, betraying Gaza and Ukraine — could hardly be better targeted as payback.

Advertisement

The temptation for Europeans is to go further: to vent not only at him, but America itself. It’s a short jump from decrying the US president as a dictatorial moron to decrying the public who elected him. In February, Canadian ice-hockey fans booed the US national anthem; “Make America Go Away” has made a great baseball cap. But otherwise, anti-Americanism has been notable by its absence.

Compare this to the years of George W Bush, the president who claimed he was misunderestimated before choking on a pretzel, when Americans were routinely mocked as fat, ignorant and arrogant. New Yorkers on holiday were made to feel personally responsible for war crimes. On the eve of the Iraq war, Europeans joked about the difference between yoghurt and Americans. The punchline: after a while, yoghurt develops some culture. 

The then French president, Jacques Chirac, liked to say that he had a simple principle in foreign affairs: “I see what the Americans are doing and I do the opposite. That way, I’m sure to be right.” How they chuckled. This was the zenith not just of anti-American Islamist terrorism, but of anti-imperialist Latin American populists such as Hugo Chávez and Evo Morales.

But anti-Americanism has changed in 2025. Jokes about nationality don’t land as comfortably now. It’s rightly unfashionable to blame citizens for their governments, especially if the Americans we are most likely to encounter are despairing Democrats. 

Anyway, Netflix and social media have bound us all together. You can’t really dismiss American culture when you choose to consume it daily. Go to Paris today, and see how readily people speak English. Go to London, and puzzle at the number of NFL fans. Judging by JD Vance’s and Pete Hegseth’s Signal messages, the Trump team is more anti-European than Europeans are anti-American.

Advertisement

Those repelled by Elon Musk’s X have moved to another West Coast-based network, Bluesky. European car buyers boycott Tesla but would buy a good American alternative. Just as the most effective takedowns of Bush came from an American filmmaker, Michael Moore, the best critiques of Trump and Musk will probably also come from the US itself. America is both thesis and antithesis. 

Diplomatically too, anti-Americanism doesn’t fit the moment. Trump has reconciled with one regime that was fanatically anti-American under Bush — that is, Putin’s Russia — and even makes sporadic gestures to chavista Venezuela. Europeans are hardly in anti-imperial mood: they want American protection, not withdrawal.

The lesson of the Bush years is that presidential idiocy is temporary. Five and a half years after invading Iraq, America elected Barack Obama as president. Anti-Americanism is akin to amputating your broken leg, instead of waiting for it to heal. 

But if it’s wrong to conflate Americans and their president, it’s wrong to disentangle them entirely. Trump reflects half of America. He reflects a society where a democratic majority is prepared to tolerate mass shootings and a warped political system. America provides so much of the world’s cultural backdrop that we sometimes mistake it for our own country. It is not, even when a Democrat is president. 

Just last spring, during Joe Biden’s presidency, the US was seen unfavourably by at least half the public in Greece, Singapore and Australia, and by more than 40 per cent in Britain and Canada. The next time pollsters ask the question, they will doubtless find record western disillusion. 

Advertisement

Europeans — and Canadians and others — are realising that we have our own values and not long to stand up for them. Boycott Philadelphia cream cheese if it makes you feel better. But most Europeans see that the times are now too serious for knee-jerk anti-Americanism.

Henry Mance is the FT’s chief features writer

Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to receive the FT Weekend newsletter every Saturday morning

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Published

on

Hundreds of anti-Musk protests are planned at Tesla locations worldwide this weekend

Protesters showed up outside a Tesla showroom and service center in the North Hollywood area of Los Angeles on Saturday, March 15, 2025.

Richard Vogel/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Richard Vogel/AP

Tesla facilities worldwide have been the target of protests objecting to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s influential role in the Trump administration. This weekend, organizers who have been leading peaceful protests in recent weeks are staging what they hope to be their biggest day yet.

As part of the “Tesla Takedown” campaign, hundreds of nonviolent demonstrations are planned to take place across the U.S. on Saturday. Organizers are calling it a “global day of action” with a goal of 500 protests worldwide.

For weeks, the movement’s organizers have been encouraging people to boycott the EV maker by selling their Tesla cars and stocks. According to Tesla Takedown, thousands of grassroots groups and individuals worldwide are driving the decentralized effort.

Advertisement

Tesla Takedown organizers say the movement is fueled by anger over Musk’s slashing of the federal government, and that it aims to hit the billionaire where it hurts — the electric vehicle company that’s become his main source of wealth.

Joel Lava, who has been helping lead Tesla Takedown protests in Los Angeles, says Musk’s work to dismantle government agencies and workforce through the unofficially named DOGE initiative is the primary motivator for the movement’s members.

“He’s spearheading DOGE, which is spearheading our country’s destruction — literally destroying our country’s infrastructure,” Lava said. “Therefore, we are taking direct aim at his power, which is his wealth, which is Tesla.” 

Musk critics point to a litany of other grievances, including his attacks on diversity, a gesture he made on the Inauguration Day stage that was widely interpreted to be a Nazi salute, and his support for far-right parties.

Musk and the White House did not respond to NPR’s request for comment.

Advertisement

Since Musk’s political turn, Tesla sales have slumped, and investors have grown uneasy. But market analysts question how much the dip in Tesla sales and shares can be pinned on its CEO’s actions. Tesla has been losing market share to EV competitors for years. And the stock price has fallen in anticipation of auto tariffs. But Trump administration’s recently announced 25% import tariffs on cars made outside the U.S. could give the stock a welcome boost; auto industry analysts say that among domestic carmakers, Tesla will be the least impacted by the tariffs.

Some of the anti-Musk backlash has been violent. Tesla vehicles, dealerships and charging stations across the U.S. and in Europe have been the target of arson and vandalism. Some have taken to spray-painting swastikas on Tesla sedans and Cybertrucks.

Tesla Takedown movement, organizers say its participants are exercising their right to peacefully protest and that they oppose violence and property destruction.

But Musk did not make that distinction when he went after Valerie Costa, a community activist who has helped organize recent peaceful protests in the Seattle area as part of the Tesla Takedown demonstrations.

Musk, in a post on X earlier this month, accused Costa of “committing crimes,” without giving evidence or specific allegations. That was after he claimed that an environmental activist group she cofounded was backed by the ActBlue, a fundraising platform for Democrats.

Advertisement

Costa told NPR that the accusations were false, and that Musk supporters subsequently targeted her in direct messages that included threats of physical violence.

“When one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful person in the world is saying you’ve committed a crime, it doesn’t matter what the truth is,” Costa said.

Tesla Takedown organizers who say they want to chip away at Musk’s power, and that starts with tarnishing Tesla’s brand.

“Trump only likes [Musk] because he’s rich,” Lava, the LA-based organizer, said. “If suddenly Musk becomes just another boring, low-end billionaire, Trump will dump him too, and that will also show the power we have as people to effect change.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending