Connect with us

News

Opinion: How Britain fell out of love with Boris Johnson

Published

on

Opinion: How Britain fell out of love with Boris Johnson
Johnson clambered out of his chauffeur-driven automotive, spouse Carrie at his aspect, to attend a service of thanksgiving for Queen Elizabeth II’s 70 years on the throne; a murmur rose from the ready crowd, a low grumble that quickly coalesced into distinct boos.
It isn’t unusual for senior politicians within the UK to be jeered in public, however boos from this meeting of monarchists and traditionalists who had turned out on a windy financial institution vacation to have fun an absent monarch and have been overwhelmingly more likely to have voted Conservative on the final election should have jolted Johnson to his core.
Up to now, his gleeful insouciance and wonderful erudition had earned him one thing like a political corridor move, permission to shrug off a myriad of transgressions, each private and political, any one among which might probably have torpedoed much less blessed politicians.

However with that genteel heckling at St. Paul’s Cathedral, one thing turned obvious to him and everybody who heard it: This was the second it was clear the British public had lastly fallen out of affection with their Prime Minister.

The disappointing margin of victory within the vote of his occasion’s members of Parliament on Monday night time solely compounded a fact he had already absorbed days earlier.

Throughout per week away from Westminster for the parliamentary recess that included the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations, Conservatives had taken the temperature of their constituents and confirmed their suspicions. Johnson had misplaced his Midas contact.

The booing confirmed their worst fears, and the vote that adopted as soon as the Jubilee celebrations have been over they usually have been again in Westminster turned a rejection by colleagues who noticed little level in holding Johnson in energy if he had misplaced his magic trick of wooing voters different Conservatives could not attain.

As a result of the issue with being a populist is that while you let your individuals down, the betrayal is a extremely private one.

Extra maybe than any politician earlier than him, Johnson — “Boris,” as, tellingly, voters invariably referred to him regardless of their view of him — was sustained in energy due to his persona, not his insurance policies.

Whereas his supporters did their greatest to hype him as the person who noticed Brexit throughout the road, it was tough to overlook that as international secretary he famously wrote two opinion items for and in opposition to departing the European Union earlier than plumping for Depart, seemingly, his critics insist, on a whim.
No ideologue, he received energy as, roughly, a social libertarian, low tax Conservative, primarily as a result of it was expedient to take action. As soon as in workplace he presided over the largest enhance in private taxation in a long time, confined tens of hundreds of thousands to their properties for months and launched a proposal to deport unlawful migrants to Rwanda, once more not as a result of he significantly believed in his bones within the righteousness of such schemes however as a result of that gave the impression to be the instructions the winds have been blowing.

But it surely wasn’t the flip-flopping on coverage that led Britons to solid Johnson out of their hearts: It was one thing way more private.

On the floor, the scandal involving the Downing Avenue events throughout lockdown that have been discovered to have been in breach of the coronavirus laws seems a trivial affair in contrast with the intense points going through the UK: the price of residing, conflict in Ukraine, the problem of ending inequality.

However when every voter can bear in mind their sacrifices throughout that unusual, intense and fearful interval, the saga turned intimate, private. Many have been totally appalled that on the heart of energy, removed from being “in it collectively,” as voters have been assured, these making the principles have been flagrantly breaking them. Whereas Downing Avenue partied, unusual Britons bear in mind, they missed funerals, struggled to home-school their youngsters, misplaced jobs.

Advertisement

It made them indignant at Johnson in a much more visceral means than the frustration they could have felt when he jettisoned a coverage or made a U-turn on a call. Considering of him as a pal, even a member of the family, they felt let down by him, in the best way one may a pal or lover who fails us.

When Margaret Thatcher survived a no-confidence vote in 1989, a yr earlier than she was ultimately toppled, she was suggested by her MPs she can be protected if she ditched her hated ballot tax and took a extra collegiate strategy to the group round her.
A technology on, and in 2018, having scraped by means of a vote of her personal, Theresa Might was endorsed that she can be protected if she stopped the chaos surrounding the Brexit course of and led Britain safely out of the EU.

Neither lady was prepared, or, maybe extra precisely, in a position to take the recommendation, and each have been out of workplace inside 12 months.

And what message have Tory MPs despatched Johnson with this newest vote: What can he do to revive his premiership? What insurance policies ought to he change? What changes may he make?

None. As a result of when the issue just isn’t your concepts however your character, and it’s a character the general public now not trusts, then there’s nothing you are able to do.

Johnson has survived the vote — for now. However the message from the crowds exterior St. Paul’s has come by means of loud and clear — the occasion is over, they usually’re prepared to maneuver on.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Austin Welcomed Elon Musk. Now It’s Weird (in a New Way).

Published

on

Austin Welcomed Elon Musk. Now It’s Weird (in a New Way).

Each weekend for the past few months, Mike Ignatowski has gone to one of two Tesla dealerships in Austin, Texas, to protest Elon Musk, Tesla’s chief executive and the most famous transplant to the state’s most left-leaning city.

Not too long ago, Mr. Ignatowski, a 67-year-old computer engineer, was an admirer of Mr. Musk — before Mr. Musk aligned himself with President Trump. Now Mr. Ignatowski waves a “Fire Elon” sign during the protests, even as he conceded he’s not quite mad enough to part with the blue Model 3 Tesla that he bought “before we knew Elon was crazy,” as his bumper sticker attests.

That’s how it goes in Texas’ capital, where Mr. Musk’s sharp rightward shift has been received with a mix of anger and hair-pulling agony. Austin’s conflicted feelings reflect both the billionaire entrepreneur’s economic influence on the city and the city’s broader transformation from a medium-sized college town arranged around the State Capitol to a tech-fueled metropolis with a glass-and-steel skyline and a changing image.

Tie-dyed T-shirts still urge residents to “Keep Austin Weird,” mostly in hotels and tourist shops. But a different kind of counterculture has taken root amid an influx of decidedly right-of-center figures (including Mr. Musk), self-described freethinkers (like the podcasters Joe Rogan and Lex Fridman), and conservative entrepreneurs (like Joe Lonsdale). Already in town was Austin’s resident conspiracy theorist, Alex Jones, and his far-right Infowars. There’s even a new, contrarian institution of higher learning looking to compete with the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Austin.

Weird, perhaps, but not in the way of the old bumper-sticker mantra.

Advertisement

“If you say ‘Keep Austin Weird’ to somebody under the age of 40, they would think of that as an antique-y slogan, like Ye Old Shoppe,” said H.W. Brands, a historian at the University of Texas. “It doesn’t have any resonance for their lived experience of Austin.”

The city’s transformation followed a deliberate, decades-long project to attract technology companies to its rolling hills.

“I’m one who thinks it has changed for the better,” said Gary Farmer, who helped attract new businesses as the founding chairman of Opportunity Texas, an economic development group. “The culinary arts, the performing arts, the visual arts, the music scene — it’s all better.”

At the same time, housing prices have skyrocketed, and the population — already the whitest among big cities in Texas — has shed some of its diversity.

In 2023, more people moved out of Austin’s Travis County than moved in, and the share of Hispanic residents in Austin declined even as across all of Texas, the Hispanic population has grown to become a plurality. Black families have also been leaving Austin, said Lila Valencia, the city’s demographer.

Advertisement

The biggest increase in new residents has been among households making more than $200,000 a year, which grew by 70 percent from 2019 to 2023, Ms. Valencia said. The share of households making below $100,000 a year declined.

Austin now has about 100 accredited private schools, more than double the 39 it had two decades ago. Enrollment in the city’s public schools has been falling.

For years, locals resisted development, to no avail.

“They were building a lot of freeways in Houston and Dallas, and Austin turned away that money,” said Tyson Tuttle, the former chief executive of Silicon Labs, who moved to Austin in 1992. “They were saying, if we don’t build it, they won’t come. And they came anyway.”

Many in Austin’s new elite have chafed at the progressive policies in city and county government over issues such as homelessness and policing. Last year, some of them, including Mr. Musk, backed a primary challenger to the local Democratic district attorney, José Garza. In a companywide email, Mr. Musk encouraged Tesla employees to vote in support of the challenger.

Advertisement

Mr. Garza won the primary by a two-to-one margin.

“If an asteroid fell from the sky and hit a Democratic candidate for office in Travis County and killed that person, that person’s corpse would still beat a live Republican,” said Evan Smith, a former leader of the Texas Tribune, an Austin-based nonprofit news site.

Still, the city’s demographic transformation has led many to lament its fading identity as a place of street buskers and a cross-dressing, homeless mayoral candidate. The Austin Chronicle, an alternative weekly newspaper, even sells a shirt that reads “R.I.P. Old Austin.”

Earlier this year, passers-by stopped to listen to an impromptu street performance on Congress Street, like old times, except the guitarist was the Trump-friendly Ted Nugent, and his appearance had been organized by hard-right Republicans.

Almost as common are complaints about the complainers.

Advertisement

“I’m not one of those naysayers about Austin who say it was all better in the old days,” said Terry Lickona, who for 50 years has produced “Austin City Limits,” a public television showcase for local and national musicians. He added, “Austin has always attracted outsized characters,” including Willie Nelson and Michael Dell, the computer maker.

The struggles at Tesla, where profits have dropped sharply since Mr. Musk began closely aligning himself with Mr. Trump, could directly affect the city. At the same time, Austin is set to be the proving ground for his next big venture: self-driving Tesla taxis, which Mr. Musk promised for June.

Mr. Musk did not respond to an interview request.

“Having Tesla here is a huge benefit to the city,” said Mr. Tuttle, who has recently founded an artificial intelligence startup. “I wish that Elon would come home and focus on his business.”

The arrival of Mr. Musk and Tesla five years ago was a key moment for the city, punctuating a yearslong transformation that was accelerated by the Covid-19 pandemic. Many people, including celebrities and dissatisfied Californians whose politics were shifting amid the lockdowns, sought out the relative openness of Texas.

Advertisement

“It’s, like, most of the good stuff and very little of the bad stuff,” Mr. Rogan said during a 2021 interview with Mr. Adler, months after moving there.

The result has been a slight moderation of the city’s politics and tensions over Mr. Musk between those who hate his actions in Washington and those who love his role as a technology entrepreneur.

The city “attracts people that are on all sides of issues,” said Joshua Baer, the founder of the Capital Factory, which helps finance and nurture technology startups. “My world is generally Elon fans and supporters.”

On a recent evening, more than two dozen Austinites convened in a church meeting room adorned with colorful messages of inclusivity for a gathering of Resist Austin, which organizes protests against Mr. Musk and Mr. Trump at Tesla dealerships.

“Our mission is lawful nonviolent resistance of authoritarians,” Ian Crowl, an organizer, said to the group, which included retirees, tech workers and graduate students. “If you want to throw a rock at a Tesla,” he added, “that’s not what we’re doing here.”

Advertisement

Such tensions have been on the mind of Tesla drivers in Austin as well. Vikki Goodwin, a Democratic state representative, said she tries to be “invisible” when driving around in hers. When a car rammed into her at a stop light recently, she worried it might have been intentional.

“Oh my God,” Ms. Goodwin said she thought, “is it anger that caused him to drive into my car?”

The driver, in fact, was using his wife’s gas-powered car, Ms. Goodwin said he told her, and he assumed it would slow down quickly when he took his foot off the gas pedal — like his Tesla does.

Continue Reading

News

Surge in Chinese listings drives boom for US small-cap IPO market

Published

on

Surge in Chinese listings drives boom for US small-cap IPO market

Stay informed with free updates

The volatile market for small US initial public offerings is “booming” thanks to a surge of Chinese listings on New York’s Nasdaq as companies race to beat a rule change that blocks the smallest deals.

The surge in listings kicked off late last year with 42 small offerings in the last three months of 2024, followed by 41 in the first quarter of this year — the two busiest quarters in records back 15 years, according to equity capital markets group Capital Markets Gateway (CMG). This was up from 20 in the second quarter of 2024 and 29 in the third.

Fifty-three of the past two quarter’s listings were from China and Hong Kong, with only 18 from the US, and all but nine on Nasdaq. CMG’s data excludes special purpose acquisition vehicles, which raise money in order to take over a private business.

Advertisement

“The microcap IPO market is booming,” said Matthew Kennedy, a senior strategist at Renaissance Capital, citing small Chinese companies in sectors from pharmaceuticals to construction. “It’s a highly speculative area,” he said, with many investors losing out because most of the stocks eventually fall far below their initial offer price.

Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

The IPOs came ahead of a raft of policy changes enacted by Nasdaq, effective as of April 11, which include requiring companies listing on its lowest rung under certain standards to raise at least $15mn. The Securities and Exchange Commission said Nasdaq’s new rules would “promote fair and orderly markets” and “protect investors and the public interest”.

Daniel McClory, head of equity capital markets and China at US underwriter Boustead Securities, said he had “30 IPOs in process right now and more than a third are for [companies in] south-east Asia and Greater China”.

The market for large-cap listings has meanwhile disappointed hopes of a revival under Donald Trump. Waves of market volatility around the president’s tariff announcements led bankers to postpone several hotly anticipated tech IPOs while other large listings received a cool reception.

Advertisement

This has not stopped a flurry of sub-$50mn deals since tariffs shook markets in April. Small IPOs have continued despite Nasdaq raising the bar last month — with eight further deals since the rule change.

“Explosive returns” from companies such as Hong Kong-based Diginex, an ESG data group, and Chinese group EPWK Holdings, a crowdsourcing platform, “can fuel interest from traders hoping for quick gains”, said Kennedy.

Line chart of Share price, $ showing Shares in EPWK surged in late April but collapsed in early May

Shares in Diginex have climbed 1,375 per cent since it listed in January. Last Tuesday, it said UAE royal Sheikh Mohammed bin Sultan bin Hamdan Al Nahyan had struck a $300mn deal giving him the right to buy 6.75mn of its shares before the end of the year.

EPWK had risen 470 per cent in the months after its February market debut, but plunged 75 per cent last Monday.

The market for these small offerings is dominated by amateur traders, who are often more willing to jump on perceived bargains in the stock market during times of disruption when big money managers stay away.

The US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in 2023 warned investors about “unusual price increases on the day of or shortly after the IPOs of certain small-cap issuers, most of which involve issuers with operations outside the US” and “IPOs raising less than $25mn”.

Advertisement

The average value of money raised in the small IPOs tracked by CMG in the six months to March was around $9mn.

Brokers say there could be more small IPOs if market conditions improve. “If the market settled down and co-operated we could do an IPO a week,” McClory said. “As it is, we’re targeting about one a month.”

The two most prolific underwriters in the space — Dominari Securities and RF Lafferty — have each taken seven companies public this year, including Chinese “machine vision” company Lianhe Sowell and Hong Kong hotpot chain MasterBeef.

RF Lafferty is headquartered in the Trump Building in New York’s Financial District. Dominari Securities, which acted as lead underwriter for Diginex’s IPO, is a subsidiary of Dominari Holdings, a fintech group based about four miles north in Trump Tower. 

Shares in Dominari Holdings rose 580 per cent in the six weeks before a February 11 filing revealing that the president’s sons Donald Trump Jr and Eric Trump had joined its advisory board, the Financial Times reported last month.

Advertisement

Dominari and RF Lafferty did not respond to requests for comment.

The rush of smaller Chinese IPOs comes as concerns swirl among some investors over whether Trump will delist some Chinese stocks from US exchanges amid trade tensions with Beijing.

One banker at a small US broker said some Chinese companies listing in the US recently had “inverted their corporate structure” to obscure where they carry out the bulk of their business. He said that Chinese companies with an overseas subsidiary were converting their operating company into the parent company “to sanitise the Chinese nature of the listing”.

A bar chart of counts of microcap IPOs by country of headquarters, 2023-25

McClory said he expected that any Trump ban would probably target large state-owned enterprises and sensitive industries rather than small companies. He dismissed concerns that Chinese IPOs in the US were taking investment dollars that would otherwise benefit US entrepreneurs.

“Virtually all of these Asian IPOs were full of investors from Greater China, or Chinese-American investors in the US and outside of China,” he said. “It’s not like they come to the US and take money from American widows and orphans.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Chiefs superfan 'ChiefsAholic' sentenced to 32 years in Oklahoma prison

Published

on

Chiefs superfan 'ChiefsAholic' sentenced to 32 years in Oklahoma prison

A Kansas City Chiefs fan, ChiefsAholic, poses for photos while walking toward Empower Field at Mile High before an NFL football game between the Denver Broncos and the Chiefs,on Jan. 8, 2022, in Denver.

David Zalubowski/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

David Zalubowski/AP

TULSA, Okla. — A Kansas City Chiefs superfan known as “ChiefsAholic” was sentenced Monday in an Oklahoma courtroom to serve 32 years in state prison for robbing a Tulsa-area bank, a sentence that will be carried out after he finishes serving time in federal prison.

Xaviar Babudar, 30, appeared in a Tulsa courtroom and apologized to the court and to the victims of the December 2022 robbery of the Tulsa Teachers Credit Union in Bixby, Oklahoma, said Babudar’s attorney, Jay-Michael Swab.

“He expressed sincere remorse and took full responsibility for his actions,” Swab said.

Advertisement

Babudar already was serving more than 17 years in federal prison for a string of 11 bank robberies across seven states where he stole nearly $850,000 to finance his social media stardom. Swab said the robberies also were the result of a gambling addiction.

Tulsa County District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler had sought life in prison for Babudar.

“He is a serial robber who traumatized these victims and numerous other victims across this country,” Kunzweiler said in a statement.

Tulsa County District Judge Michelle Keely ordered Babudar’s 32-year sentence to run concurrently to his federal sentence, which means after he is released from federal prison he will be transferred to state custody to serve his remaining 14 years.

Babudar developed a following on his @ChiefsAholic account on the social platform X after attending games dressed as a wolf in Chiefs gear. His avid support of the Chiefs became well known on social media.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending