Connect with us

News

‘Not for the faint of heart’: Private equity’s last retail barbarian

Published

on

‘Not for the faint of heart’: Private equity’s last retail barbarian

Ailing retailers like Walgreens Boots Alliance have scared off even the most daring Wall Street financiers. But that fear has repeatedly proven an opportunity for Sycamore Partners’ Stefan Kaluzny.

The intensely secretive co-founder of the private equity firm has been able to make big bets that Americans are not done with malls and in-person shopping, with few rivals daring to circle.

This week Sycamore, which has sucked up waning brands such as Staples, Talbots and Ann Taylor despite managing only about $10bn, announced its biggest deal yet: a $23.7bn transaction to take Walgreens private.

The buyout firm now has to revive a business ravaged by declining prescription drug reimbursements and ecommerce, with 12,500 outlets spanning the US, Europe and Latin America, under brands including Walgreens, Boots, Duane Reade and Benavides. Many peers see the stores as unsalvageable.

“It’s not for the faint of heart,” one lawyer who has worked with Sycamore said of leveraged buyouts in the retail sector. “Oftentimes these deals have less competition because [they’re] going where other people won’t touch with a 10-foot pole.”

Advertisement
Sycamore co-founder Stefan Kaluzny has refined his technique over 14 years of buyouts © Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images/AAFA American Image Awards

Kaluzny’s well-worn playbook starts with the intricate dossiers Sycamore maintains on hundreds of US retail chains, one Wall Street veteran recalled.

The next step is achieving a modest purchase price. Sycamore has developed a reputation for bargaining hard right up until signing. In some cases — the $6.9bn deal for office supplies chain Staples, for example — Sycamore has even pulled off price chips after reaching a handshake on the terms, according to securities filings and deal insiders.

After landing a deal, Sycamore makes aggressive plans to get its equity investment back quickly by breaking up a target or selling off real estate to generate immediate cash proceeds.

With Staples, Kaluzny rapidly separated the consumer chain that had been battered by Amazon from the business-to-business segment, and sold the company’s headquarters to itself so that it could then collect lease payments. The result: a $1bn dividend within a few years.

“Sycamore is willing . . . to get their hands dirty,” one person involved in the Walgreens buyout said.

Advertisement

The firm’s success had less to do with “brilliant operational moves” than the fact they were “not sentimental” and were willing to shut down or liquidate business lines quickly, the person said. “They’re willing to play hardball.”

Sycamore and Kaluzny declined to comment.

Such high-stakes gambits are typical of an investor seen by peers as a brutally tough negotiator with a stomach for some of the most complex turnarounds on Wall Street.

Kaluzny honed his craft at buyout group Golden Gate Capital, before setting up Sycamore in 2011. It was a rich time to buy brick-and-mortar retailers: shopping centres were still full of foot traffic and the 2008 financial crisis had knocked many of their businesses off track, creating cheap opportunities for pugnacious investors such as Apollo Global Management and KKR.

Yet since then, the approach has sometimes struggled.

Advertisement

Investing in retail companies with hulking real estate footprints and thousands of employees can be treacherous, and when retailers fail, they do not collapse quietly.

Previous Sycamore deals involved the owner of shoe Stuart Weitzman and Kurt Geiger © Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg
The buyout firm’s latest acquisition is for a different type of troubled retailer, Walgreens Boots Alliance © Bridget Bennett/Bloomberg

“Private equity firms have lost so much money in retail,” said one banker that has worked with Sycamore. “Retail and leverage don’t usually work well. If you get the timing wrong, if you get the fashion wrong, you get your head handed to you.”

One of Sycamore’s thornier situations was its 2014 investment in retail conglomerate Jones Group, where the buyout firm sold two of the company’s most valuable brands — Stuart Weitzman and Kurt Geiger — to another entity it controlled.

It renamed the rump of the business Nine West, which filed for bankruptcy in 2018, and sparked a legal brawl.

Creditors accused the private equity group of stripping Nine West of valuable assets, leaving it unable to pay off its debt and ultimately insolvent. Sycamore settled the dispute in court by paying junior bondholders; in exchange, the group received releases from future liabilities related to the buyout.

Three years after Nine West’s bankruptcy filing, another Sycamore portfolio company, private department store chain Belk, filed for bankruptcy under the weight of more than $1bn in debt after six years under the firm’s ownership. Sycamore ultimately ceded control of the company to lenders in a restructuring last year.

Advertisement

Sycamore’s first fund had returned 24 per cent as of the third quarter of last year, while its third fund from 2018 had brought in 18 per cent, according to a person familiar with the returns and public filings. However, its second one from 2014 has only returned 5 per cent.

The private equity group launched a fourth fundraise during the second half of last year which has yet to close, according to a person familiar with the matter.

While private equity titans like Blackstone and KKR have generally walked away from retail buyouts, Sycamore — and Kaluzny — has stuck around.

Kaluzny has run the firm on his own since 2022, when his co-founder Peter Morrow departed. “Stefan’s smart about it,” said the lawyer. “They really scrutinise the assets and figure out ways they can capture value, in a way other people couldn’t.”

With Walgreens Boots, the 90 per cent drop in the company’s market capitalisation in the past decade spells opportunity.

Advertisement

US pharmacy chains have suffered from a punishing combination of flagging sales and steeper costs, and Walgreens has been no exception.

The buyout group will attempt to turn the business around by using the same game plan it has applied to other targets in its 14 years of buying brands, according to people familiar with the group’s business strategy.

Sycamore ultimately plans to split the pharmacy chain into at least three businesses, the Financial Times previously reported. The company’s US pharmacy retailer Walgreens, its British retail arm Boots, and the speciality pharma unit Shields Health Solutions are among the units that could ultimately become independent companies.

Pulling that off means putting in place precise financing arrangements for the deal to reflect the differing prospects of the businesses, one of the reasons the buyout took months to negotiate.

Lenders to the US retail business, for example, required Sycamore to secure the debt with inventory, including prescription drugs, according to a person involved in the deal.

Advertisement

Such a structure gives lenders — which include private credit firm Ares — a claim on the assets if the unit defaults on its debt or ultimately files for bankruptcy.

Cleaving a company into parts can help buyout firms unlock conglomerate discounts and secure a higher overall payout, and Sycamore is well practised in the art. But there is still considerable work to be done whipping parts of Walgreens’ core business into shape for potential future buyers.

“Presumably Sycamore’s going to be focused on cost-cutting and cost-reduction to improve cash flow,” said James Goldstein, the head of US retail at CreditSights.

“I’m sure they’ll push hard, but do they have better ideas of how to fix the pharmacy business than the existing management team or anyone else? I don’t know.”

Additional reporting by Sujeet Indap, Antoine Gara and Eric Platt in New York

Advertisement

News

Not a Deal-Breaker: White House Downplays Iranian Action Near the Strait

Published

on

Not a Deal-Breaker: White House Downplays Iranian Action Near the Strait

Just two weeks ago, President Trump threatened to wipe out Iran’s civilization if it did not open the Strait of Hormuz. Days later, he said any Iranian “who fires at us, or at peaceful vessels, will be BLOWN TO HELL!”

Yet on Wednesday, after Iran seized two ships near the Strait of Hormuz, the White House was quick to argue the action was not a deal breaker for potential peace negotiations.

“These were not U.S. ships,” Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said on Fox News. “These were not Israeli ships.” Therefore, she explained, the Iranians had not violated a cease-fire with the United States that Mr. Trump has extended indefinitely.

She cautioned the news media against “blowing this out of proportion.”

The surprisingly tolerant tone from the White House suggests Mr. Trump is not eager to reignite a war that he started alongside Israel on Feb. 28 — a war that has proved unpopular with Americans and has gone on longer than he initially estimated.

Advertisement

The president on Tuesday extended a cease-fire between the United States and Iran that had been set to expire within hours, saying he wanted to give Tehran a chance to come up with a new proposal to end the war.

The American military has displayed its overwhelming might during the war, successfully striking thousands of targets. But it remains unclear whether Mr. Trump will accomplish the political objectives of the war.

The Iranian regime, even after its top leaders were killed, is still intact. Iran has not agreed to Mr. Trump’s demands to turn over its nuclear capabilities to the United States or significantly curtail them. And the Strait of Hormuz, a key passageway for world commerce that was open before the war, remains closed.

Nevertheless, the White House has repeatedly highlighted the military successes on the battlefield as evidence it is winning the war.

“We have completely confused and obliterated their regime,” Ms. Leavitt said on Fox Wednesday. “They are in a very weak position thanks to the actions taken by President Trump and our great United States armed forces, and so we will continue this important mission on our own.”

Advertisement

The oscillation between threats and a more conciliatory tone has long been one of Mr. Trump’s signature negotiating strategies.

Potential peace talks between the two countries are on hold. Vice President JD Vance had been poised to fly to Islamabad for negotiations. But the trip was postponed until Iran can “come up with a unified proposal,” Mr. Trump said.

The United States recently transmitted a written proposal to the Iranians intended to establish base-line points of agreement that could frame more detailed negotiations. The document covers a broad range of issues, but the core sticking points are the same ones that have bedeviled Western negotiators for more than a decade: the scope of Iran’s uranium enrichment program and the fate of its stockpile of enriched uranium.

Mr. Trump has not spoken publicly about the cease-fire, other than on social media. On Wednesday, he also posted about topics including “my Apprentice Juggernaut” — a reference to his former television show; the Virginia elections, which he called “rigged”; and a new book about Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Pentagon says Navy secretary is leaving, the latest departure of a top defense leader

Published

on

Pentagon says Navy secretary is leaving, the latest departure of a top defense leader

Secretary of the Navy John Phelan speaks, as President Trump listens, at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club on Dec. 22 in Palm Beach, Fla.

Alex Brandon/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Alex Brandon/AP

WASHINGTON — Navy Secretary John Phelan is leaving his job, the Pentagon abruptly announced Wednesday, the first head of a military service to depart during President Trump’s second term but just the latest top defense leader to step down or be ousted.

No reason was given for the unexpected departure of the Navy’s top civilian official, coming as the sea service has imposed a blockade of Iranian ports and is targeting ships linked to Tehran around the world during a tenuous ceasefire in the war. Another Trump loyalist is taking over as acting head of the Navy: Undersecretary Hung Cao, a 25-year Navy combat veteran who ran unsuccessful campaigns for the U.S. Senate and House in Virginia.

Phelan’s departure is the latest in a series of shakeups of top leadership at the Pentagon, coming just weeks after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired the Army’s top uniformed officer, Gen. Randy George. Hegseth also has fired several other top generals, admirals and defense leaders since taking office last year.

Advertisement

The firings began in February 2025, when Hegseth removed military leaders, including Adm. Lisa Franchetti, the Navy’s top uniformed officer, and Gen. Jim Slife, the No. 2 leader at the Air Force. Trump also fired Gen. Charles “CQ” Brown Jr. as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Showing how sudden the latest move was, Phelan had addressed a large crowd of sailors and industry professionals on Tuesday at the Navy’s annual conference in Washington and spoke with reporters about his agenda. He also hosted the leaders of the House Armed Services Committee to discuss the Navy’s budget request and efforts to build more ships, according to a social media post from his office.

Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a post on X that Phelan was “departing the administration, effective immediately.”

Phelan had been a major Trump donor

Phelan had not served in the military or had a civilian leadership role in the service before Trump nominated him for secretary in late 2024. He was seen as an outsider being brought in to shake up the Navy.

Hung Cao speaks during the Republican National Convention on July 16, 2024, in Milwaukee.

Hung Cao speaks during the Republican National Convention on July 16, 2024, in Milwaukee.

Matt Rourke/AP

Advertisement


hide caption

toggle caption

Matt Rourke/AP

Advertisement

Phelan was a major donor to Trump’s campaign and had founded the private investment firm Rugger Management LLC. According to his biography, Phelan’s primary exposure to the military came from an advisory position he held on the Spirit of America, a nonprofit that supported the defense of Ukraine and the defense of Taiwan.

The Associated Press could not immediately reach Phelan’s office for comment. The White House did not answer questions and instead responded by sending a link to Parnell’s statement.

Phelan is leaving during a busy time for the Navy. It has three aircraft carriers deployed in or heading to the Middle East, while the Trump administration says all the armed forces are poised to resume combat operations against Iran should the ceasefire expire.

The Navy also has maintained a heavy presence in the Caribbean, where it has been part of a campaign of strikes against alleged drug boats. It also played a major role in the capture of Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in January.

New acting Navy secretary ran unsuccessful bids for Congress

Taking over as acting secretary is Cao, who ran a failed U.S. Senate bid in Virginia to try to unseat Democratic Sen. Tim Kaine in 2024. He had Trump’s endorsement in the crowded Republican primary and gave a speech at the 2024 Republican National Convention.

Advertisement

Cao’s biography includes fleeing Vietnam with his family as a child in the 1970s. In a campaign video for his Senate bid, he compared Vietnam’s communist regime during the Cold War to the administration of Democratic President Joe Biden.

During his one debate with Kaine, Cao criticized COVID-19 vaccine mandates for service members as well as the military’s diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.

“When you’re using a drag queen to recruit for the Navy, that’s not the people we want,” Cao said from the debate stage. “What we need is alpha males and alpha females who are going to rip out their own guts, eat them and ask for seconds. Those are the young men and women that are going to win wars.”

Trump and Hegseth have railed against DEI in the military, banning the efforts and firing people accused of supporting such programs.

When he ran for Congress in Virginia in 2022, Cao expressed opposition to aid for Ukraine during a debate against his Democratic opponent.

Advertisement

“My heart goes out to the Ukrainian people. … But right now we’re borrowing $55 billion from China to pay for the war in Ukraine. Not only that, we’re depleting our national strategic reserves,” Cao said.

Cao graduated from the prestigious Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Virginia, before attending the U.S. Naval Academy.

He was commissioned as a special operations officer and went on to serve with SEAL teams and special forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia before retiring at the rank of captain, according to his Senate campaign biography.

Cao also earned a master’s degree in physics and had fellowships at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University.

Since becoming Navy undersecretary, Cao has championed returning to duty service members that refused a Biden-era mandate to take the COVID-19 vaccine.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

California Candidates to Appear in First Major Debate After Swalwell

Published

on

California Candidates to Appear in First Major Debate After Swalwell

Candidates in California’s volatile race for governor will meet Wednesday night for the first televised debate since Eric Swalwell dropped out, each looking to seize momentum in the tight contest.

The debate, being held at the television studio of KRON4 in San Francisco, will include four Democrats and two Republicans who are tightly bunched in recent polls, with many voters still undecided less than six weeks before the June 2 primary.

Mr. Swalwell, a Democrat, had just begun to emerge as a Democratic front-runner when his campaign swiftly collapsed after he was accused of sexual assault in news reports on April 10.

Candidates have taken relatively few risks so far in debates around the state, but every candidate is now eyeing a chance to jump to the front of the pack.

“Even though we have seen some movement in the last couple of weeks, it continues to be a fairly crowded, fractured field,” said Sara Sadhwani, an assistant professor of politics at Pomona College. “So candidates need to be able to grab attention in a debate like this.”

Advertisement

The debate comes as Xavier Becerra, a Democrat and former California attorney general, has enjoyed a surge of support in polls since Mr. Swalwell dropped out of the race.

Mr. Becerra and Matt Mahan, the mayor of San Jose, did not originally meet the threshold to participate in Wednesday’s debate when Mr. Swalwell was running. But they both qualified after receiving enough support in a follow-up poll that debate organizers commissioned once Mr. Swalwell had dropped out.

The other Democrats scheduled to participate are Tom Steyer, a former hedge fund manager, and Katie Porter, a former congresswoman, each of whom have been polling near the top of the Democratic field for several weeks. The Republicans in the debate are Steve Hilton, a former Fox News host who has been endorsed by President Trump, and Chad Bianco, the sheriff of Riverside County.

All candidates run on the same ballot in California’s nonpartisan primary, with the two who receive the most votes advancing to the general election, regardless of their party affiliation. The large number of Democratic candidates has created fear among state party leaders that their voters could splinter, potentially allowing two Republicans to sweep the primary in this heavily Democratic state.

The odds of that happening have decreased since Mr. Swalwell dropped out and another Democrat, Betty Yee, withdrew on Monday. But Rusty Hicks, the chairman of the California Democratic Party, still believes there are too many Democrats in the race and has urged those lagging in polls to end their campaigns. (The actual ballot will include 61 candidates for governor, most of whom are completely unknown to voters.)

Advertisement

The messy race to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom, who cannot run for re-election because of term limits, has played out as the most unpredictable contest California has seen in a generation. It has attracted a sprawling field but no one with the star power of former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or the political might of Mr. Newsom or former Gov. Jerry Brown.

Much of California’s Democratic establishment is still figuring out whom to back in the turbulent race.

Mr. Newsom has not endorsed anyone, saying he trusts voters to elect someone “who reflects the values and direction Californians believe in.” Representative Nancy Pelosi, the influential former House speaker from San Francisco, and Senator Alex Padilla also have not announced their favorites. Senator Adam Schiff endorsed Mr. Swalwell earlier this year but quickly withdrew his support after the accusations against him were published.

On Tuesday, Ms. Yee endorsed Mr. Steyer, praising his work to fight climate change and engage young voters. Mr. Steyer has swamped his competitors with a raft of advertising by pouring $134 million from his personal fortune into his campaign.

Also on Tuesday, Mr. Becerra, whose campaign had appeared to be flailing until Mr. Swalwell dropped out, received the endorsement of Robert Rivas, the Democratic speaker of the California State Assembly. Mr. Rivas said he had encouraged Mr. Becerra to run for governor because he was impressed by his work as California’s attorney general during President Trump’s first term.

Advertisement

“He understands both the policy and the politics,” Mr. Rivas said in an interview. “And he has a track record, in my opinion, of delivering results under pressure.”

The 90-minute debate on Wednesday begins at 7 p.m. PT and will be broadcast and streamed by KRON and other California stations.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending