Connect with us

News

Former Moscow-linked Church claims religious persecution as security raids heat up | CNN

Published

on

Former Moscow-linked Church claims religious persecution as security raids heat up | CNN



CNN
 — 

The vertically shot video revealed final November reveals no weapons, battlefield atrocities and even troopers. However the sound of a patriotic Russian track reverberating by way of a church on Kyiv’s well-known Lavra monastery grounds appeared to open a brand new entrance in Ukraine’s conflict with Russia.

The church belongs to the Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UOC) – which, regardless of the identify, has historically been loyal to the Russian Orthodox Church, and whose present chief Patriarch Kiril has brazenly supported Moscow’s brutal invasion. Splitting with Kiril, the management of the UOC denounced Russia’s assault, and final Might, declared its independence from Russia.

In a sermon days after the break up, Patriarch Kiril stated he was praying that “no momentary exterior obstacles will ever destroy the non secular unity of our folks.”

Days after the video surfaced, masked members of the Ukrainian Safety Service (SBU) performed a raid on the Lavra – formally, to stop it getting used for “hiding sabotage and reconnaissance teams” or “storing weapons.”

Advertisement

By December, a handful of church leaders had been sanctioned, and dozens extra church buildings throughout the nation had been raided by the SBU – although the searches turned up little quite a lot of Russian passports, symbols and books.

“There was no point out within the findings of weapons or saboteurs. What they stated they discovered was printed matter, paperwork, which aren’t prohibited beneath Ukrainian regulation,” UOC Bishop Metropolitan Klyment advised CNN in an interview.

There’s loads of grey space, nonetheless. In a press release the Safety Service of Ukraine (SBU) advised CNN that it’s not unlawful to retailer Russian propaganda, however it’s to distribute it. “If such literature is within the library of the diocese or on the cabinets of a church store, it’s apparent that it’s supposed for mass distribution,” the assertion learn.

It insisted that the raids on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church “are aimed solely at nationwide safety points. This isn’t a matter of faith.” Vladimir Legoyda, a spokesperson for the Russian Orthodox Church, nonetheless, slammed the searches as an “act of intimidation.”

Advertisement

Professor Viktor Yelenskyi, Ukraine’s newly appointed non secular freedom watchdog, stated that for greater than 30 years the UOC management has been “poisoning folks with the concepts of the Russian world.” He defended the SBU’s raids, evaluating them to the crackdown on Islamic extremism after 9/11. “Ukraine remains to be a secure haven for non secular freedom.”

But, on the finish of 2022, the federal government declined to resume the church’s lease on its huge, central Lavra cathedral and turned over the keys to the equally named, however utterly separate Orthodox Church of Ukraine (OCU). The rival OCU celebrated Orthodox Christmas (on January 7) mass there for the primary time this 12 months.

Talking exterior the church on Christmas Day, Alla, who declined to provide her final identify, stated, “I feel it ought to’ve been carried out a very long time in the past.”

“We’ve been tolerating this [UOC] evil and shutting our eyes as we thought we must be tolerant, however the conflict introduced all of it to floor.”

Father Pavlo Mityaev is pictured at the Orthodox Church of Ukraine Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Vita Poshtova, a village just outside Kyiv.

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church held this 12 months’s Christmas mass at a smaller church down simply steps from the cathedral. Kyrylo Serheyev, a pupil on the lavra seminary, stated this 12 months particularly, he’s praying for Ukrainian troops. And regardless of authorities sanctions and scrutiny of his church, he insists “our patriotism isn’t turning into much less.”

Advertisement

Viktoria Vinnyk stated she was unhappy to not have mass within the central cathedral this 12 months. Although she speaks Russian, she’s by no means been to Russia.

“I hope for higher in my nation. And I hope that the scenario will change,” she stated.

The cathedral isn’t the one holy web site to alter palms. Outdoors Kyiv, within the village of Vita Poshtova, a small church has sat perched on a hillside above the frozen lake for the reason that Soviet period. It’s the one one within the village. In September the congregation voted to transform the church from UOC to the impartial OCU. Parishioner Olha Mazurets says she was uncomfortable with any connection to Russia.

“It’s a matter of id and self-preservation. We should establish our enemy too,” she advised CNN.

The ceiling of the Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary at Vita Poshtova in Ukraine.

Father Pavlo Mityaev, the newly appointed priest says earlier than conflict, “folks didn’t take note of whether or not it was a Ukrainian or Russian-speaking church, they had been coming to God. However when the conflict began, every part modified.”

Advertisement

In accordance with Klyment, as much as 400 of the UOC’s 12,000 church buildings in Ukraine have transformed to the OCU for the reason that conflict started.

The safety companies says that for the reason that full-scale invasion started, 19 church clergy have been charged and 5 have been convicted.

In December, UOC priest Andriy Pavlenko was sentenced to 12 years for passing details about Ukrainian battlefield positions within the Donbas to the Russians. Every week later, he was despatched to Russia as a part of a prisoner alternate.

Klyment acknowledges that priest’s guilt however dismisses different instances – just like the Vinnytsia priest indicted simply this week for disseminating pro-Russian propaganda – as hole accusations. He thinks the broader church is being unfairly tarnished.

“Members of the Ukrainian Orthodox … are residents of Ukraine, and typically among the many greatest residents of Ukraine, proving their patriotism with their very own lives,” he stated referring to UOC members preventing on the entrance traces.

Advertisement

In his nightly deal with on December 1, President Volodymyr Zelensky indicated he was ready to transcend raids – proposing a regulation to ban church buildings with “facilities of affect” in Russia from working in Ukraine – all within the identify of “non secular independence.”

“We are going to by no means enable anybody to construct an empire contained in the Ukrainian soul,” he stated.

However Klyment believes that regulation would merely push his church underground.

“What else do you name persecution if not this?” he requested.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Taliban Frees an American, George Glezmann, Held in Afghanistan Since 2022

Published

on

Taliban Frees an American, George Glezmann, Held in Afghanistan Since 2022

The Taliban on Thursday released George Glezmann, an American held since 2022 in Afghanistan, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said.

Mr. Glezmann, an Atlanta native, was a Delta Air Lines mechanic who was detained while visiting Afghanistan as a tourist in December 2022. The State Department had officially designated him a wrongful detainee.

Mr. Glezmann boarded a Qatari aircraft in Kabul, the Afghan capital, to fly to Doha, Qatar, with U.S. and Qatari officials on Thursday. Qatar maintains close ties with the ruling Taliban government in Afghanistan and has hosted talks between it and U.S. officials. Negotiations between the first Trump administration and Taliban insurgents for a U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan occurred in Doha.

In his announcement of Mr. Glezmann’s release, Mr. Rubio thanked the Qatari government for its help. Adam Boehler, who had been President Trump’s pick for special envoy for hostage affairs, took part in the negotiations with the Taliban.

The meeting in Kabul between American and Taliban officials was the first known in-person contact of any significance between the two governments since Mr. Trump took office in January. Mr. Boehler was accompanied on the trip by Zalmay Khalilzad, the special envoy for Afghanistan reconciliation in the first Trump administration and a former ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq and the United Nations.

Advertisement

Mr. Boehler arrived at the meeting in Kabul dressed in a gray jacket, black sweater and black baseball cap. Mr. Khalilzad wore a navy suit and purple-and-red floral tie. They sat at a wooden table across from Amir Khan Muttaqi, the foreign minister of Afghanistan, and other Afghan officials, photographs of the meeting showed.

The Taliban toppled a U.S.-backed Afghan government in August 2021 and returned to power after President Joseph R. Biden Jr. executed the troop withdrawal that Mr. Trump had negotiated in his first term. The United States does not have diplomatic relations with the Taliban and has imposed sanctions on its officials. Moderate Taliban officials are seeking to normalize relations with the United States.

The United States does not maintain a presence in Kabul, unlike European countries, which have been more successful in negotiating releases of their citizens with the Taliban.

Mr. Rubio said on Thursday that Mr. Glezmann’s release was “also a reminder that other Americans are still detained in Afghanistan.”

The State Department said it was still seeking the return of six American detainees in Afghanistan and the remains of one U.S. citizen. The agency has not labeled them wrongfully detained, although one State Department official said the Americans were unjustly detained.

Advertisement

A wrongful detention designation means the U.S. government tries to prioritize freeing that citizen.

The department has focused on Mahmood Shah Habibi, an Afghan American businessman who was taken from his vehicle near his home in Kabul in August 2022, according to an F.B.I. report. Mr. Habibi worked for the Asia Consultancy Group, a telecommunications company based in Kabul.

The Taliban government released two Americans, Ryan Corbett and William Wallace McKenty, in late January in a prisoner swap arranged by the Biden administration. U.S. officials released Khan Mohammed, a member of the Taliban who had been imprisoned for life in California on charges of drug trafficking and terrorism. Mr. Biden gave a conditional commutation to Mr. Mohammed before he left office.

Christina Goldbaum contributed reporting from Damascus, Syria.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

The promise of the fifth estate is being squeezed

Published

on

The promise of the fifth estate is being squeezed

JD Vance told a funny story at the American Dynamism Summit in Washington this week. He recalled a Silicon Valley dinner he and his wife Usha attended, before he became vice-president, where the talk had been of machines replacing humans in the workforce. According to Vance, an unnamed chief executive from one giant tech company said that the jobless of the future could still find purpose in fully immersive digital gaming. “We have to get the hell out of here. These people are effing crazy,” Usha texted him under the table.

Why Vance thought it a good idea to tell this story is puzzling, given it contradicted the central theme of his speech — but at least it got a laugh. As Usha Vance colourfully implied, the worldview of the techno-libertarians and ordinary workers appears antagonistic. But her husband’s main message was the opposite: that the tech sector and ordinary workers had a shared interest in promoting the “great American industrial renaissance”.

Vance’s speech was a clear attempt to reconcile the two warring wings of President Donald Trump’s political movement: the tech bro oligarchy — or broligarchy — led by Elon Musk, and the Maga nationalists animated by Steve Bannon. Bannon has denounced globalist tech leaders as anti-American and described Musk as a “truly evil person” and a “parasitic illegal immigrant”.

Vance declared himself a “proud member of both tribes”. He may be right that Musk and Bannon have much in common in spite of their pungent differences. They are both elitist anti-elitists with a shared mission to overturn the power of the administrative state and the mainstream press.

Historians once described the three ancient estates of power as the clergy, nobility and commoners. A fourth estate — the press — was later added. And a fifth estate — social media — has since emerged. But the fifth estate could be seen as a software update of the third one: commoners armed with smartphones. In that view, Bannon may be a tribune of the third estate while Musk is a champion of the fifth. In the Trump movement, the two have fused.

Advertisement

In his book The Fifth Estate, William Dutton argued that social media represented a new and mostly positive form of power allowing individuals to access alternative sources of information and mobilise collective action. He sees Greta Thunberg, the Swedish schoolgirl who emerged as a global environmental campaigner, as its poster child. “It is the scale of the technology that changes the role of the individual in politics and society,” he tells me.

Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s chief executive, has also declared the fifth estate to be a global public good giving voice to the once-voiceless. “People having the power to express themselves at scale is a new kind of force in the world,” he said in 2019.

That all sounds great in theory. But the negative effects of social media have become increasingly striking: misinformation, incitement to hatred and the emergence of an “anxious generation” of teenagers. Social media has mutated from a technology of liberation to one of manipulation. It has corroded the political process and been hijacked by anti-establishment populists. 

One study of 840,537 individuals across 116 countries from 2008 to 2017 found that the global expansion of the mobile internet tended to reduce approval of government. This trend was especially marked in Europe, undermining support for incumbent governments and boosting anti-establishment populists. “The spread of the mobile internet leads to a decline in confidence in the government. When the government is corrupt people are more likely to understand that the government is corrupt,” one of the co-authors of the paper Sergei Guriev, now dean of London Business School, tells me.

Populist politicians have been quick to exploit voter dissatisfaction aroused by social media and use the same technology to mobilise support in cheap and interactive ways. “It is normal for anti-elite politicians to use new technologies that are not yet embraced by the elites,” Guriev says. 

Advertisement

The fifth estate has certainly rattled the old gatekeepers of information in politics and the media. But new digital gatekeepers have emerged who control who sees what on the internet. Trump’s “first buddy” Musk bought Twitter, now X, which promotes or demotes posts in unaccountable ways. The free-speech absolutists who denounce moderation and government “censorship” are often providing cover for more insidious forms of algorithmic control.

Progressive campaigners acknowledge they are on the back foot on social media but they have not abandoned hope. “It is more important than ever to fight for the future. We need to use these tools as well as we can,” says Bert Wander, chief executive of Avaaz, a crowdfunded global campaigning platform. With 70mn members in 194 countries, Avaaz mobilises action against corruption and campaigns for algorithmic accountability, as included in the EU’s Digital Services Act. “We need to communicate in technicolour with all the emotion and resonance that the nationalist populists use,” Wander says.

For such progressives, three bracing truths emerge from this debate. The power of the fifth estate is a disruptive force that is not going away. Populists have been particularly smart in their use of it. And to compete, progressives drastically need to up their game.

john.thornhill@ft.com

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

‘See you in court’: Teachers union vows to fight Trump’s Education Department order

Published

on

‘See you in court’: Teachers union vows to fight Trump’s Education Department order


The president plans to sign an executive order on Thursday attempting to dismantle the Education Department. A leading teachers union is already preparing to challenge him.

play

WASHINGTON – “See you in court.”

Advertisement

That was the one-sentence retort from a leading teachers union Wednesday following news that President Donald Trump planned to sign an executive order Thursday aimed at eliminating the U.S. Department of Education.

Randi Weingarten, the head of the American Federation of Teachers, vowed to sue the administration if it moved forward with a mandate to obliterate the agency’s limited federal role in the nation’s schools.

The action is unlawful, she and others have argued, because only Congress has the power to close federal agencies. Still, the Trump administration has slashed the Education Department’s workforce in half, which is prompting widespread concern from students and schools about reductions in vital services. Democratic state attorneys general and advocates for students with disabilities sued last week to stave off those cuts.

Advertisement

Multiple polls have shown that the idea of abolishing the Education Department is unpopular among Americans.

Teachers unions have been at the forefront of litigation against the Trump administration’s education policies in recent weeks and months. The AFT filed a separate suit this week accusing the Education Department under Trump of “effectively breaking the student loan system.”

The president plans to sign his much-touted executive order alongside Republican governors Thursday afternoon at the White House. Lawsuits will likely follow once the full text of the order has been released.

Advertisement

Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @zachschermele.bsky.social.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending