Connect with us

News

China tightens ban on ‘non-essential’ overseas travel as lockdown anger rises | CNN

Published

on

China tightens ban on ‘non-essential’ overseas travel as lockdown anger rises | CNN

Editor’s Word: A model of this story appeared in CNN’s In the meantime in China e-newsletter, a three-times-a-week replace exploring what it’s worthwhile to know in regards to the nation’s rise and the way it impacts the world. Enroll right here.


Hong Kong
CNN
 — 

Authorities in China have imposed a de facto worldwide journey ban, forbidding residents from going abroad for “non-essential” causes, as the federal government ramps up efforts to implement its zero-Covid coverage.

In a press release Thursday, the Chinese language Nationwide Immigration Administration stated it might tighten its reviewing course of on issuing journey paperwork equivalent to passports, and strictly restrict these trying to go away.

The administration justified the measures by claiming it was essential to “scale back the chance of an infection when leaving the nation, and of carrying the virus when getting into the nation.” Journey will solely be permitted for “important” functions, outlined by the administration as resuming work, research, enterprise and scientific analysis, in addition to looking for medical care.

Advertisement

Those that have to go overseas to assist with preventing the pandemic, or transporting catastrophe reduction sources can have their purposes expedited, in accordance with the announcement.

Officers didn’t reveal how they could implement the brand new restrictions, or stop would-be vacationers in possession of legitimate journey paperwork from leaving.

The brand new measures characterize China’s most stringent restrictions on outbound journey in a long time, putting additional pressure on a inhabitants that has endured greater than two years of draconian Covid-19 controls together with citywide lockdowns, mass testing and obligatory quarantine.

“Don’t exit until vital, don’t go away the nation until vital, don’t be born until vital,” learn one fashionable remark in response to the information on China’s Twitter-like platform Weibo.

Others speculated officers is likely to be cracking down on journey as a result of extra individuals wish to escape as fears rise over new government-enforced lockdowns – particularly within the capital Beijing, the place Covid circumstances are rising. These fears have solely been exacerbated by the chaos and dysfunction that has engulfed locked-down cities equivalent to Shanghai.

Advertisement

“Those that need to flee from China are scared that individuals’s rights and dignity are nothing within the face of the federal government’s absolute energy (amid the outbreak),” one Weibo remark learn.

“Are we going again to the nationwide seclusion coverage of the Qing Dynasty?” one other consumer wrote, referring to China’s final imperial dynasty whose remaining years within the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries have been marked by the nation’s rising isolation from the remainder of the world.

Outbound journey amongst unusual Chinese language was nonetheless closely restricted till the early 2000s – nevertheless it boomed as family incomes rose and the federal government relaxed guidelines. Chinese language residents made 670 million abroad journeys in 2019, the final regular journey 12 months earlier than the pandemic, in accordance with the nation’s Immigration Administration.

However that quantity has plunged in the course of the pandemic, with simply over 73 million inbound and outbound journeys in 2021.

Even earlier than Thursday’s announcement, touring in or out of China had turn out to be immensely tough. The borders are nonetheless largely shut to outsiders, with solely Chinese language residents getting back from abroad and people with particular visas or residence permits allowed to enter. Flights are restricted and costly – and all these wishing to enter often face a strict quarantine of as much as 21 days.

Advertisement

China has additional discouraged journey by dramatically scaling again the variety of journey paperwork issued. It solely issued 7.98 million paperwork in 2021, lower than 6% of the paperwork issued in 2019, in accordance with the Immigration Administration – which additionally introduced it might cease renewing passports for “non-essential” journey in February.

Thursday’s restrictions deal a blow to Chinese language residents married to overseas nationals. It may additionally show one other roadblock for college students wishing to attend college abroad – who already confronted disappointment this week after the USA School Board introduced it might cancel Superior Placement (AP) exams – typically thought-about an vital a part of school purposes within the US – in a number of areas, citing “widespread Covid restrictions.”

Public frustration has been rising steadily over the previous few months as authorities throughout the nation imposed lockdown measures – typically over only a handful of circumstances.

At the least 32 cities throughout China at the moment are below full or partial lockdown, impacting as much as 220 million individuals, in accordance with CNN’s calculations.

Probably the most notable amongst them is Shanghai, the rich monetary hub, which has been below citywide lockdown since late March. All through April, residents caught at residence reported being unable to entry meals, medication or different important provides.

Advertisement

In current days, complaints have surfaced on social media over neighborhood staff forcibly getting into individuals’s houses with out permission and damaging their private belongings throughout disinfection. One viral video confirmed residents arguing with cops making an attempt to take them from their houses; it’s unclear below what coverage the residents have been being forcibly eliminated, or the place they have been being despatched.

People wait in long lines at a supermarket on May 12 in Beijing, China.

Fears are rising that the nation’s capital may very well be subsequent. Beijing authorities have inspired residents to remain residence, and commenced rolling out a number of new rounds of mass testing – prompting panic shopping for at supermarkets, with images displaying lengthy strains as residents rushed to replenish on provides in case of a lockdown.

Beijing officers refuted claims of an impending lockdown on Thursday and urged the general public to not hoard meals, asserting there have been sufficient provides obtainable. However their reassurance might do little good, with public belief already frayed – particularly since Shanghai’s citywide lockdown had come simply days after authorities there denied any such plans.

“It is a acquainted image,” one Weibo consumer remarked below a video displaying Beijing officers making an attempt to calm the general public. One other wrote: “After the teachings realized, who dares to take the chance?”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Small but mighty Nimble becomes first mixed-breed dog to win Westminster agility title

Published

on

Small but mighty Nimble becomes first mixed-breed dog to win Westminster agility title

Cynthia Hornor poses with Nimble, the first mixed-breed dog ever to win the Westminster Kennel Club dog show’s agility competition, in New York on Monday.

Jennifer Peltz/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jennifer Peltz/AP


Cynthia Hornor poses with Nimble, the first mixed-breed dog ever to win the Westminster Kennel Club dog show’s agility competition, in New York on Monday.

Jennifer Peltz/AP

She was nimble, she was oh-so-very quick – with the perfect moniker to match.

A 6-year-old canine from of Ellicott City, Md., named Nimble beat out 350 competitors to become the first mixed-breed dog to win the Westminster Kennel Club’s Masters Agility Championship in New York.

Advertisement

“I was surprised,” Nimble’s handler Cynthia Hornor told NPR. “But she proved that she’s the little engine that could.”

Nimble, who finished the race in a blistering 28.76 seconds, is a first in more ways than one: She also became the first dog from the 12-inch height division to take home the top prize since the agility competition — itself the first WKC event to allow mixed breeds to compete — was introduced in 2014.

Dogs compete in the 8-inch, 12-inch, 16-inch, and 20-inch categories. The top 10 dogs from each height category go on to compete in the championships.

While she made two firsts, Nimble also had at least two big aces in her paws.

Advertisement

Despite coming in an underdog — as part of the non-purebred category the WKC refers to as “All American Dogs” — Nimble is a combination of two pedigrees made up of winners: a border collie-papillon mix. Border collies have won eight of the last 11 agility titles, while the top three finishers in this year’s competition were all papillons.

Nimble’s second secret weapon: her owner and handler Hornor, who won the Masters Agility title in 2023 with her other dog Truant, a 20-inch border collie.

“This is going to be a fun run,” a Fox Sports announcer predicted on Saturday as Nimble eagerly waited for the clock to start her final run.

When it did, the pointy-eared black and white pup rocketed her way through a series of hoops, seesaws, ladders and more with hardly any cueing needed from Horner.

“I said it was going to be fun, but I didn’t know it was going to be an e-ticket!” the announcer said halfway through Nimble’s race, with eager crowds cheering in the background.

Advertisement

Hornor says she hopes Nimble’s big win will be enough to put to bed any false ideas that mixed breeds can’t be as fast as purebred dogs.

“Agility is the equalizer,” Hornor said. “Mixed-breed dogs can be just as fast as purebred dogs.”

Nimble’s reward for proving it?

“She got steak, and she got to play,” said Hornor. “She just really loves playing, so her reward is being able to go run and play.”

And if there’s one lesson Hornor wants other dog owners to take away from Nimble’s big win, it’s that agility is a great way for owners to bond with their dogs.

Advertisement

“It’s the thing I enjoy the most about this sport,” said Hornor, who has been an agility trainer for more than 20 years. “When I see my students, I love seeing their bond grow with their dogs because of agility.”

Continue Reading

News

China poses ‘genuine and increasing cyber risk’ to UK, warns GCHQ head

Published

on

China poses ‘genuine and increasing cyber risk’ to UK, warns GCHQ head

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

China poses a “genuine and increasing cyber risk to the UK”, the head of Britain’s signals intelligence agency has said.

The remarks by Anne Keast-Butler, director of GCHQ, follow a slew of alleged China-related espionage activity in the UK, including a suspected cyber attack that targeted the records of thousands of British military personnel.

Keast-Butler told a security conference in Birmingham on Tuesday that while the cyber threats from Russia and Iran were “globally pervasive” and “aggressive” respectively, China was her agency’s top priority.

Advertisement

“China poses a genuine and increasing cyber risk to the UK,” she said, calling the country “the epoch-defining challenge” in a direct echo of the British government last year.

“In cyber space, we believe that the PRC’s [People’s Republic of China’s] irresponsible actions weaken the security of the internet for all,” said Keast-Butler.

“China has built an advanced set of cyber capabilities and is taking advantage of a growing commercial ecosystem of hacking outfits and data brokers at its disposal,” she added.

Her warnings came a week after a reported cyber attack on private IT contractor SSCL, which has multiple government contracts, accessed the records of up to 272,000 people on the UK Ministry of Defence’s payroll.

Defence secretary Grant Shapps told parliament last week that the attack had been carried out by a “malign actor”. He did not confirm who was behind it, but a person with direct knowledge of the incident said Beijing was thought to be the culprit.

Advertisement

SSCL, which is owned by Paris-based Sopra Steria, a digital services company, holds the payroll details of most of the British armed forces and 550,000 public servants in total through its other state contracts, including with the Home Office, Ministry of Justice and Metropolitan Police.

The hack is one of a series of recent incidents that has sparked growing concern across Europe and in the US about Chinese cyber and espionage activity.

On Monday, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said Britain faced threats from “an axis of authoritarian states like Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China” as three men appeared in a London court on charges of assisting intelligence services in Hong Kong.

On Tuesday, the UK government summoned China’s ambassador to Britain, Zheng Zeguang, over the case.

John Lee, Hong Kong’s chief executive, on Tuesday said his administration had demanded the British government provide an explanation about the prosecution of one of the three men, Bill Yuen, who was the office manager of the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Office in London.  

Advertisement

Beijing officials have also repeatedly denied the British accusations, calling them “groundless and slanderous” in what has become a tit-for-tat series of allegations and denials.

Meanwhile, Felicity Oswald, who heads the National Cyber Security Centre, a branch of GCHQ, warned CyberUK conference attendees about the Chinese Communist party’s cyber capability, which she described as “vast in scale and sophistication”.

She said western security agencies had repeatedly raised the alarm about Volt Typhoon, a Chinese hacking network, which FBI director Christopher Wrap said this year had targeted the US electricity grid and water supply.

Oswald added that a Chinese law, introduced in recent years, that required Chinese citizens to report any cyber security vulnerabilities they identified to the government “should worry all of us”.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Despite state bans, abortions nationwide are up, driven by telehealth

Published

on

Despite state bans, abortions nationwide are up, driven by telehealth

Abortion rights activists at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on March 26, the day the case about the abortion drug mifepristone was heard. The number of abortions in the U.S. increased, a study says, surprising researchers.

Drew Angerer/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Drew Angerer/AFP via Getty Images


Abortion rights activists at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. on March 26, the day the case about the abortion drug mifepristone was heard. The number of abortions in the U.S. increased, a study says, surprising researchers.

Drew Angerer/AFP via Getty Images

In the 18 months following the Supreme Court’s decision that ended federal protection for abortion, the number of abortions in the U.S. has continued to grow, according to The Society of Family Planning’s WeCount project.

“We are seeing a slow and small steady increase in the number of abortions per month and this was completely surprising to us,” says Ushma Upadhyay, a professor and public health scientist at the University of California, San Francisco who co-leads the research. According to the report, in 2023 there were, on average, 86,000 abortions per month compared to 2022, where there were about 82,000 abortions per month. “Not huge,” says Upadhyay, “but we were expecting a decline.”

Advertisement

The slight increase comes despite the fact that 14 states had total abortion bans in place during the time of the research. According to the report, there were about 145,000 fewer abortions in person in those states since the Dobbs decision, which triggered many of the restrictive state laws.

“We know that there are people living in states with bans who are not getting their needed abortions,” says Upadhyay. “The concern we have is that that might be overlooked by these increases.”

Florida, California and Illinois saw the largest surges in abortions, which is especially interesting given Florida’s recent 6-week ban that started on May 1.

Abortion rights opponents demonstrate in New York City, on March 23. Some states’ abortion bans are known as “heartbeat bills,” because they make abortion illegal after cardiac activity starts, usually around six weeks of pregnancy.

Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images


Abortion rights opponents demonstrate in New York City, on March 23. Some states’ abortion bans are known as “heartbeat bills,” because they make abortion illegal after cardiac activity starts, usually around six weeks of pregnancy.

Kena Betancur/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

The latest report also captures for the first time the impact of providers offering telehealth abortions from states with protections for doctors and clinics known as shield laws – statutes that say they can’t be prosecuted or held liable for providing abortion care to people from other states.

Between July and December 2023, more than 40,000 people in states with abortion bans and telehealth restrictions received medication abortion through providers in states protected by shield laws. Abortion pills can be prescribed via telehealth appointments and sent through the mail; the pills can safely end pregnancies in the first trimester.

The report includes abortions happening within the U.S. health care system, and does not include self-managed abortions, when people take pills at home without the oversight of a clinician. For that reason, researchers believe these numbers are still an undercount of abortions happening in the U.S.

Accounting for the increases

A major factor in the uptick in abortions nationwide is the rise of telehealth, made possible in part by regulations first loosened during the coronavirus pandemic.

According to the report, telehealth abortions now make up 19% of all abortions in the U.S. In comparison, the first WeCount report which spanned April 2022 through August 2022 showed telehealth abortions accounted for just 4% of all abortions. Research has shown that telehealth abortions are as safe and effective as in-clinic care.

Advertisement

“It’s affordable, it’s convenient, and it feels more private,” says Jillian Barovick, a midwife in Brooklyn and one of the co-founders of Juniper Midwifery, which offers medication abortion via telehealth to patients in six states where abortion is legal. The organization saw its first patient in August 2022 and now treats about 300 patients a month.

“Having an in-clinic abortion, even a medication abortion, you could potentially be in the clinic for hours, whereas with us you get to sort of bypass all of that,” she says. Instead, patients can connect with a clinician using text messages or a secure messaging platform. In addition to charging $100 dollars for the consultation and medication – which is well below the average cost of an abortion – Barovick points to the cost savings of not having to take off work or arrange child care to spend multiple hours in a clinic.

She says her patients receive their medication within 1 to 4 business days, “often faster than you can get an appointment in a clinic.”

A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine on Monday followed about 500 women who had medication abortions with the pills distributed via mail order pharmacy after an in-person visit with a doctor. More than 90% of the patients were satisfied with the experience; there were three serious adverse events that required hospitalization.

In addition to expansions in telehealth, there have been new clinics in states like Kansas, Illinois and New Mexico, and there’s been an increase in funding for abortion care – fueled by private donors and abortion funds.

Advertisement

The impact of shield laws

During the period from October to December 2023, nearly 8,000 people per month in states with bans or severe restrictions accessed medication abortions from clinicians providing telehealth in the 5 states that had shield laws at the time. That’s nearly half of all monthly telehealth abortions.

“It’s telemedicine overall that is meeting the need of people who either want to or need to remain in their banned or restricted state for their care,” says Angel Foster, who founded The MAP, a group practice operating a telehealth model under Massachusetts’ shield laws. “If you want to have your abortion care in your state and you live in Texas or Mississippi or Missouri, right now, the shield law provision is by far the most dominant way that you’d be able to get that care.”

Foster’s group offers medication abortions for about 500 patients a month. About 90% of their patients are in banned or restrictive states; about a third are from Texas, their most common state of origin, followed by Florida.

“Patients are scared that we are a scam,” she says, “they can’t believe that we’re legit.”

Since the WeCount data was collected, additional states including Maine and California have passed shield laws protecting providers who offer care nationwide. The new shield laws circumvent traditional telemedicine laws, which often require out-of-state health providers to be licensed in the states where patients are located. States with abortion bans or restrictions and/or telehealth bans hold the provider at fault, not the patient.

Advertisement

Existing lawsuits brought by abortion opponents, including the case awaiting a Supreme Court decision, have the potential to disrupt this telehealth surge by restricting the use of the drug mifepristone nationwide. If the Supreme Court upholds an appeals court ruling, providers would be essentially barred from mailing the drug and an in-person doctor visit would be required.

There is also an effort underway in Louisiana to classify abortion pills as a controlled substance.

Continue Reading

Trending