Connect with us

News

BBC’s flagship soccer show boycotted over Gary Lineker impartiality row | CNN

Published

on

BBC’s flagship soccer show boycotted over Gary Lineker impartiality row | CNN



CNN
 — 

The BBC’s weekend soccer protection has been plunged into chaos following its announcement that Gary Lineker would “step again” from presenting, after he turned embroiled in an impartiality row when he criticized British authorities coverage on Twitter.

The broadcaster now faces a boycott from pundits, presenters and even gamers of its flagship soccer present “Match of the Day,” whereas different soccer packages – Soccer Focus and Remaining Rating – and a few radio programming have been pressured off air because of the furore.

Lineker criticized the federal government’s controversial new asylum seeker coverage on Tuesday and was subsequently stepped down from his presenting duties this week for the reason that BBC stated his tweets breached their tips, particularly its dedication to “due impartiality.”

The BBC’s determination has sparked controversy, leaving the group underneath hearth from opposition politicians, the BECTU union who characterize BBC employees, and its former director common Greg Dyke.

Advertisement

“The BBC will solely be capable of convey restricted sport programming this weekend and our schedules might be up to date to mirror that,” a BBC spokesperson stated in a press release Saturday.

“We’re sorry for these adjustments which we acknowledge might be disappointing for BBC sport followers.

“We’re working exhausting to resolve the scenario and hope to take action quickly.”

On Tuesday, Lineker tweeted “Good heavens, that is past terrible” to a video posted on Twitter by the British Dwelling Workplace saying the brand new proposed coverage – an try to cease migrant boats crossing the English Channel from France which has been criticized by the United Nations and different world our bodies.

He added: “There isn’t a large inflow. We take far fewer refugees than different main European nations. That is simply an immeasurably merciless coverage directed on the most susceptible individuals in language that isn’t dissimilar to that utilized by Germany within the 30s, and I’m out of order?”

Advertisement

As Britain’s public broadcaster, the BBC is sure by “due impartiality” – a a lot debated time period which the group defines as holding “energy to account with consistency” whereas not “permitting ourselves for use to marketing campaign to alter public coverage.”

On Friday, the BBC introduced that Lineker would “step again from presenting Match of the Day till we’ve obtained an agreed and clear place on his use of social media,” including that it thought-about his latest social media exercise to breach its tips.

In response, first pundits, then commentators, after which even Premier League groups introduced their intention to boycott the present in help of Lineker.

BBC commentators Steve Wilson, Conor McNamara, Robyn Cowen and Steven Wyeth stated in a joint assertion issued late on Friday that “within the circumstances, we don’t really feel it will be acceptable to participate within the programme.”

Advertisement

Jermain Defoe, a former England striker, introduced Saturday he wouldn’t seem as a pundit on the Sunday present.

“It’s at all times such a privilege to work with BBC MOTD. However tomorrow I’ve taken the choice to face down from my punditry duties. @GaryLineker,” Defoe tweeted.

Defoe’s announcement seems to be the primary signal that the British broadcaster’s Sunday tv programming may also be affected.

In the meantime, the Skilled Footballers’ Affiliation announced on Saturday that “gamers concerned in at this time’s video games won’t be requested to take part in interviews with Match of the Day.”

“The PFA have been talking to members who needed take a collective place and to have the ability to present their help for many who have chosen to not be a part of tonight’s programme,” the assertion added.

Advertisement

“Throughout these conversations we made clear that, as their union, we’d help all members who may face penalties for selecting to not full their broadcast commitments. It is a frequent sense determination that ensures gamers received’t now be put in that place.”

Following his aspect’s 1-0 defeat in opposition to Bournemouth on Saturday, Liverpool supervisor Jurgen Klopp was requested in regards to the BBC subject.

“I can not see any purpose why they might ask anybody to step again for saying that. I’m unsure if that’s a language subject or not,” the German advised reporters.

“If I perceive it proper, then that is about an opinion about human rights and that must be potential to say.

“What I don’t perceive is why everyone goes on Twitter and says one thing. I don’t perceive the social media a part of it however that’s in all probability [because] I’m too outdated for that.”

Advertisement

The BBC’s former director common Greg Dyke stated that the broadcaster has “undermined its personal credibility” by suspending Lineker as a result of it appeared prefer it had “bowed to authorities strain.”

Keir Starmer, chief of the opposition Labour Get together, stated that the BBC had obtained “this one badly incorrect and now they’re very, very uncovered.”

Scotland’s First Minister Nicola Sturgeon tweeted: “As a powerful supporter of public service broadcasting, I need to have the ability to defend the BBC. However the determination to take Gary Lineker off air is indefensible. It’s undermining free speech within the face of political strain – & it does at all times appear to be rightwing strain it caves to.”

Opposition Labour Get together deputy chief Angela Rayner additionally lambasted the BBC’s determination in a tweet on Saturday.

“The BBC’s cowardly determination to take Gary Lineker off air is an assault on free speech within the face of political strain from Tory politicians. They need to rethink,” she tweeted.

Advertisement

In the meantime Nadine Dorries, an MP with the governing Conservative social gathering and former Tradition Secretary, welcomed the BBC’s determination, tweeting: “Information that Gary Lineker has been stood down for investigation is welcome and exhibits BBC are critical about impartiality.

“Gary is entitled to his views – free speech is paramount. Numerous non Public Service Broadcasters can accommodate him and his views and he could be higher paid.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Published

on

Read the Letter to the Inspectors General

Your investigation of these allegations is consistent with the IG’s mission to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in federal agencies, and can help determine if politically connected crypto interests are undermining our national security. As Congress considers legislation on the market structure for digital assets, we must ensure that cryptocurrencies like USD1 are not providing the President and senior officials with the ability to line their pockets at the expense of the public interest.

The following facts have been reported in multiple outlets regarding Mr. Witkoff:

• Mr. Witkoff’s son Zach Witkoff is the CEO of World Liberty Financial (WLF), which the President’s family owns a majority stake in.³
• Beginning in January, one of Sheikh Tahnoon’s employees, Fiacc Larkin, joined WLF as the “chief strategic advisor” while continuing to work at G42, an AI investment firm owned by Sheikh Tahnoon that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, works closely with Chinese military companies.4



On May 1, 2025, Zach Witkoff announced that MGX, a state-owned investment firm controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, had agreed to use a WLF-issued stablecoin, USD1, to make a $2 billion investment in Binance. As a result of this deal, WLF stands to reap hundreds of millions of dollars in transaction fees from MGX, and more from the returns on any investments it makes with the $2 billion deposit.³
As of August, Mr. Witkoff maintained a financial interest in WLF and thus stands to personally benefit from his son’s business dealings with the UAE.6 Nevertheless, he did not recuse himself from deliberations regarding the UAE, which may violate federal ethics law.

The following facts have been reported about Mr. Sacks:







He is a special government employee who continues to serve as a “general partner” at his venture capital fund, Craft Ventures.

8

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, an Emirati sovereign wealth fund controlled by Sheikh Tahnoon, was an early investor in Craft Ventures and continues to hold an investment in the fund.
In addition, Craft Ventures is invested in BitGo, which has partnered with WLF to provide the technical infrastructure for USD1. If BitGo’s valuation grows, based on the UAE’s investment into USD1, Mr. Sacks and his firm stand to benefit.

3 Yahoo Finance, “Trump family reportedly has a 60% stake in the World Liberty Financial,” Anand Sinha, March 31, 2025,
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-family-reportedly-60-stake-172742661.html.
4 New York Times, “Inside U.S. Efforts to Untangle an A.I. Giant’s Ties to China,” Mark Mazzetti and Edward
Wong, Nov. 27, 2023, www.nytimes.com/2023/11/27/us/politics/ai-us-uae-china-security-g42.html.
5 New York Times, “At a Dubai Conference, Trump’s Conflicts Take Center Stage,” David Yaffe-Bellany, May 1, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/01/us/politics/trump-cryptocurrency-usd1-dubai-conference-

announcement.html.

6U.S Office of Government Ethics, Form 278e for Steven C. Witkoff, August 13, 2025, p. 23, https://static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics/documenttools/090d0de07e1d2fdf/bbf02867-full.pdf.

18 U.S.C. § 208.

8 White House, “Limited Waiver Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 208(b)(1) Regarding A.I. Assets,” June 2025,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/David-Sacks.pdf.

2

Continue Reading

News

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Published

on

Farage refuses to criticise Trump over paracetamol despite health experts dismissing autism claims

Nigel Farage has refused to criticise Donald Trump’s claims that paracetamol, sold in the US as Tylenol, could cause autism, insisting “science is never settled” and he would never “side with” medical experts.

The Reform UK leader said he had “no idea” if the US president was right to tell pregnant women to avoid taking acetaminophen, also known as Tylenol and paracetamol, and suggesting that those who could not “tough it out” should limit their intake.

Scientists and global health agencies including the World Health Organization have strongly dismissed Trump’s false claims, calling them misguided and saying the evidence linking paracetamol use in pregnancy and autism was “inconsistent”.

The UK’s health secretary, Wes Streeting, told the British public they should not “pay any attention whatsoever to what Donald Trump says about medicine”, adding: “I trust doctors over President Trump frankly, on this.”

But in a wide-ranging interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Farage was asked directly if Trump was right to share those unproven claims. He said: “I have no idea, I’ve no idea. You know we were told thalidomide was a very safe drug and it wasn’t. Who knows Nick, I don’t know.

Advertisement

“He [Trump] has a particular thing about autism. I think because there’s been some in his family, he feels it very personally. I’ve no idea.”

When Farage was asked if he would side with medical experts who say it is dangerous to make the link, he added: “I wouldn’t. I wouldn’t. When it comes to science, I don’t side with anybody, right? You know? I don’t side with anybody, because science is never settled. We should remember that.”

Yet when challenged over whether it was irresponsible for Trump to make such an unproven claim, Farage said: “That’s an opinion he’s [Trump’s] got. It’s not one that I necessarily share.”

Farage’s refusal to condemn Trump’s claims comes weeks after a controversial doctor, Aseem Malhotra, was given top billing at Reform UK’s party conference and used his main-stage speech to claim the Covid vaccine caused cancer in the royal family. Malhotra is an adviser to Trump’s health secretary, Robert F Kennedy.

In the same interview, Farage said Trump was “right to say” that sharia law “is an issue in London”.

Advertisement

“Never take what he [Trump] says literally, ever on anything. But always take everything he says seriously,” Farage said, adding: Trump “has a point.”

“So is he right to say that sharia is an issue in London? Yes. Is it an overwhelming issue at this stage? No. Has the mayor of London directly linked himself to it? No.”

Labour MPs have urged Keir Starmer to reprimand Trump’s administration after the US president falsely claimed in a speech to the United Nations: “I look at London, where you have a terrible mayor, terrible, terrible mayor, and it’s been changed, it’s been so changed.

skip past newsletter promotion

“Now they want to go to sharia law. But you are in a different country, you can’t do that.”

Trump has been publicly attacking the London mayor, Sadiq Khan, since 2015 when the Labour politician criticised Trump, the then presidential candidate, for suggesting that Muslims should be banned from travelling to the US.

A spokesperson for Khan said: “We are not going to dignify his appalling and bigoted comments with a response. London is the greatest city in the world, safer than major US cities and we’re delighted to welcome the record number of US citizens moving here.”

During the LBC phone-in, Farage also said Reform’s plan to ban anyone who was not a UK citizen from claiming benefits would not apply to Ukrainians and Hongkongers.

Advertisement

“No, because they come for different reasons,” Farage said, adding those who had lived in the UK on indefinite leave to remain and had not worked or paid into the system would be told their benefits would be cut.

Continue Reading

News

Alphabet market value exceeds $3tn

Published

on

Alphabet market value exceeds tn

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Alphabet’s market capitalisation surged above $3tn for the first time on Monday on the back of a sharp rally for the search giant’s shares over the past few weeks.

Shares in Google’s parent company have climbed more than 30 per cent to a record high of $252 since the group posted double-digit growth in revenue and profit in quarterly results out in late July.

The rally means Alphabet joins Nvidia, Microsoft and Apple as the only US companies valued above $3tn. Chipmaker Nvidia in July became the first company to hit a $4tn market value.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending