Movie Reviews
Review: Paul Thomas Anderson's 'One Battle After Another'
Vague Visages’ One Battle After Another review contains minor spoilers. Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2025 movie features Leonardo DiCaprio, Sean Penn and Benicio del Toro. Check out the VV home page for more film criticism, movie reviews and film essays.
Few directors wear their influences on their sleeves as openly as Paul Thomas Anderson; only his friend Quentin Tarantino even comes up in the conversation when discussing major auteurs whose distinctive styles are built entirely from overt homage. But whereas Tarantino’s philosophies and quirks can often be heard pouring out of the mouths of his characters in each fast-paced dialogue exchange, you’d be hard pressed to find any similar example of Anderson placing himself in the shoes of genre movie protagonists he grew up idolizing. He’s a San Fernando Valley native who, up until this point, appears to have suggested that the film with the closest personal correlation to his life is the London-set Phantom Thread (2017), which he’s characterized as a romantic comedy loosely inspired by the time his wife (the actress Maya Rudolph) looked after him when he came down with the flu. It’s a period drama set in the 1950s fashion world in which the uptight protagonist’s partner poisons him with mushrooms so he won’t take her caring for granted. Unsurprisingly, a direct autobiography is something Anderson’s work has frequently proved he couldn’t be less interested in.
With One Battle After Another, Anderson uses the skeleton of Thomas Pynchon’s satirical 1990 novel Vineland — an expansive tale about a group of 1960s American idealists being targeted in a sting operation — to tell what appears to be his most nakedly personal tale to date. Updating the novel’s setting to a California that could either be a post-Donald Trump dystopia or a snapshot of any period following the paranoid outbreak of George W. Bush’s War on Terror, the rallying cries of its leftist revolutionary protagonists are less impactful than the family drama it’s all grounded within. The reason many have been quick to embrace a film with very purposefully divisive politics is the overriding sentiment of a father (Leonardo DiCaprio as Bob Ferguson, in another stellar performance likely to be underrated) reckoning with his daughter’s safety in an authoritarian world he wasn’t powerful enough to stop coming into being. That this is a white father with a biracial daughter whose life experiences will be more difficult than he can immediately comprehend suggests that, even if Bob is far from a director surrogate, he’s a fleshed-out personification of Anderson’s own parental anxieties as a father of mixed-race children. The director may often hide his emotions under the veil of homage; however, with One Battle After Mother, he’s never been more openly sentimental, at least since his 1999 film Magnolia.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — Review: Justin Tipping’s ‘HIM’

One Battle After Another’s extensive opening prologue focuses on Ghetto Pat (the former alias of DiCaprio’s character) and his partner Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor), who lead the revolutionary group French ‘75. Introduced freeing masses of immigrants from a detention center near the Mexican border, the group crosses paths with Colonel Steven J. Lockjaw (Sean Penn), an openly racist and high-ranking figure who nevertheless fetishizes Black women (his first introduction to Perfidia at gunpoint immediately ignites a sexual obsession). It’s something of a victory for media literacy that the framing of these sequences hasn’t yet led to accusations that Anderson plays into the very behavior he’s satirizes, with one POV shot from Lockjaw’s perspective lingering on Taylor’s posterior like the heroine of a Michael Bay Transformers movie. Lockjaw’s racism clouds that he’s a misogynist too, and witnessing the strong women of the French ‘75 turns him on — not through the idea of them domineering him, but through the idea that he’d be the one able to control them. And seeing Pat embrace Perfidia seconds later throws hot water on that fantasy.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — Review: Macon Blair’s ‘The Toxic Avenger’
Pat and Perfidia have a daughter, but as the latest in a long family line of revolutionaries, Taylor’s character doesn’t want to settle down and be a parent. A failed heist leads to her capture by Lockjaw, her safety only guaranteed by ratting on her group members (who are subsequently executed one by one) before fleeing to Mexico, where she’s never heard of again. Pat is given a new identity for himself and his daughter before he can be killed. Suddenly, Anderson picks up 16 years when the now teenage Willa (Chase Infiniti) is being hunted down by Lockjaw and a justice department looking to tie up some loose ends, which include finally tracking down the revolutionary now known as Bob.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — 12 Angry Films: Sidney Lumet on Justice #1 – ’12 Angry Men’

Pynchon’s source novel is labyrinthine, a series of richly detailed and intersecting anecdotes surrounding a revolutionary group which doesn’t have ramifications in its present day until the very last chapters. One Battle After Another doesn’t devote time to character backstories, as exposition only appears within propulsive action sequences, but the film does share Pynchon’s fascination with the secret societies formed in the crevices of this dystopia. In Vineland, much ink was spilled building out various government initiatives, leading up to expansive side plots centered around creations like College of the Surf, an institution designed to lure society’s idealists and transform them into Nixonian government stooges. Anderson, on the other hand, is a far more lowbrow storyteller, which I say as a compliment. He waters down the elaborate, period-specific satire for broader gags, like a white supremacist society known as the Christmas Adventurers Club, which Lockjaw is desperate to become a member of.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — ‘Scrooged’ Is Still the Most Modern ‘Christmas Carol’
Anderson’s simplifying of denser satirical ideas is, of course, a likely byproduct of having a $130 million studio budget, but more crucially, it’s because the kind of right-wing authoritarianism being parodied has grown even less sophisticated since the 1990 publication of Pynchon’s novel. Refreshingly, there is no overt Trump parallel in One Battle After Another (Mickey 17, this is thankfully not), nor are there references to the MAGA movement, with Lockjaw and his deep-state networks all representing the kind of ridiculousness within contemporary fascism that has made many disarmed to the evil of the politics they represent. Penn’s character is written as the same kind of macho alpha male as a Vladimir Putin or a Jair Bolsonaro, yet he’s styled as something far more flamboyant, with a penchant for wearing tight t-shirts which occasionally bring his sexuality into question. Colonel Lockjaw immediately looks immediately, and Penn leans into this with a silent comedy physicality to his every movement. And yet this laughable exterior does little to hide the insidiousness of the character’s politics. Even if viewers might laugh at Colonel Lockjaw, Anderson is keen to remind audiences that viewing fascist figures in this way, divorced from their beliefs, does nothing to stop their abhorrent worldviews from becoming normalized.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — Review: Sepideh Farsi’s ‘Put Your Soul on Your Hand and Walk’

DiCaprio’s Bob is also a laughable figure, the personification of the long-standing observation that left-wing movements are always derailed by the lack of basic organization skills from everybody involved in them. But even as he’s also a hot-tempered man out of time — at one point yelling at his daughter’s boyfriend in a doorway like Martin Lawrence’s Marcus Burnett in the 2003 film Bad Boys II, because, yes, there are numerous parallels to Michael Bay’s oeuvre here — Anderson has no interest in taking the toothless mentality of many a political satire and suggesting both sides are as bad as each other. Bob is unsuited to the rescue operation he’s entrusted with, but his return to the world of underground revolutionaries — which, now as a crotchety middle-aged man, he’s frequently irritated by — isn’t pitched as a joke at the expense of such movements. Instead, through the eyes of a man who grew disillusioned with the revolutionary life, Anderson allows audiences to view the stakes from a father’s perspective, rather than a wannabe Che Guevara’s. The personal and the political are always entwined in One Battle After Another, but there’s an elegance in how the writer/director manages to re-contextualize a heightened war between rivaling factions as straightforwardly humanist without watering down any of the characters’ world views. Even as the film is nakedly about a father’s struggle to save his daughter, Anderson wants viewers to meet the protagonist on his political terms, which –even as he’s grown older and grumpier — are still further to the left than most of the likely audience.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — Review: Kôji Fukada’s ‘Love on Trial’
Is it a surprise that a movie which feels like such a powder keg in the current moment has become universally embraced? Undoubtedly. And a critical anomaly like Anderson’s 2025 film couldn’t be more welcome, as there’s an appetite for cinema that isn’t afraid to address the divisions of the modern era without hiding behind an allegory. In One Battle After Another, the political is inextricable from the personal, in a way that transcends a mere commentary on Trump’s America. If we woke up tomorrow in a utopia, Anderson’s father/daughter tale would resonate just as strongly as it does right now.
Alistair Ryder (@YesitsAlistair) is a film and TV critic based in Manchester, England. By day, he interviews the great and the good of the film world for Zavvi, and by night, he criticizes their work as a regular reviewer at outlets including The Film Stage and Looper. Thank you for reading film criticism, movie reviews and film reviews at Vague Visages.
One Battle After Another Review: Related — On Power and Pleasure in Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘Phantom Thread’
Related
Categories: 2020s, 2025 Film Reviews, Action, Crime, Dark Comedy, Drama, Featured, Film, Movies, Thriller
Movie Reviews
Frankenstein movie review: Gothic epic that softens the emotional edges of Mary Shelley’s classic
Director: Guillermo del Toro
Cast: Oscar Isaac, Jacon Elordi, Mia Goth and Christoph Waltz
Rating: ★★★.5
Acclaimed filmmaker Guillermo del Toro returns to the candlelit corridors of Gothic horror with his take on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a realm he last flirted with in Crimson Peak (2015). This time, the canvas is bigger, shinier and powered by Netflix money, with a marquee cast led by Oscar Isaac as Victor Frankenstein, Jacob Elordi as the Creature, Mia Goth as Elizabeth, and Christoph Waltz as the patrician benefactor, Henrich Harlander. Around them orbit David Bradley, Charles Dance and Felix Kammerer, each adding texture to a tale that’s equal parts spectacle and self-importance.

The movie opens in a frozen wasteland where a stranded captain drags a wounded Victor aboard, only to face a brutal assault from Victor’s creation. From there, the film traces Victor’s ascent from obsessive student to self-anointed god—piecing together bodies, flirting with immortality, and unleashing a being whose hunger for connection curdles into rage. Guillermo keeps the period setting, shifts character dynamics (William as an adult, Elizabeth refocused), and steers the narrative toward a collision between maker and made that comes faster than you expect.
The good
Guillermo’s eye remains unmatched. The laboratory—leaf-strewn, fly-buzzed, alive with crackling energy—is a triumph of production design, while Kate Hawley’s costumes and Dan Laustsen’s painterly frames make nearly every shot gallery-ready. Alexandre Desplat’s score coils around the imagery, pushing the film toward operatic grandeur. The Creature’s birth sequence is a thunderclap: classic iconography, modern muscle, zero camp.
Performance-wise, Jacob is the film’s heartbeat. He disappears into the role, toggling between naive wonder and feral impulse. The physicality sells both the creature’s fragility and his terrible force. Oscar leans into Victor’s fevered ambition—slick, persuasive, and increasingly hollowed out—as the consequences of his “invention” spiral. Mia brings a prickly curiosity to Elizabeth, especially in moments where her compassion toward the Creature reframes their dynamic. And Christoph has a ball as Harlander, the velvet-gloved capitalist who funds genius and shrugs at the fallout; he strolls through scenes with a venture capitalist’s swagger dressed in 19th-century finery.
Crucially, the film moves. Despite the weight of Mary Shelley’s text, Guillermo hits the big beats cleanly. When it wants to thrill—snapped vertebrae, bone-on-stone brutality—it does, and the orchestration of action is crisp even when the camera averts its gaze at the crucial second.
The bad
That same restraint blunts its impact. The film repeatedly cuts away from the aftermath of violence, and the creature’s assaults become more implied than felt. Del Guillermo’s preference for beauty over viscera sands off the grime and shock that might have plunged us deeper into Victor’s moral rot. Early reanimation trials—with peeled skin and exposed muscle—look pristine, almost museum-still; they lack the ooze, tremor and unpleasant “aliveness” that would make them truly abject and, by extension, indict Victor more forcefully.
Some character recalibrations don’t land. Aging William up, reassigning relationships and compressing arcs drains poignancy from key turns—his final line to Victor barely stings because the bond hasn’t been built. Elizabeth is compelling in concept, but the script sidelines her when it matters most, handing her an exit that feels more mechanical than tragic.
The verdict
A lavish, often dazzling reinterpretation that seduces with craft but hesitates to get its hands truly dirty. Guillermo honours Mary Shelly’s skeleton and sharpens Victor’s culpability, yet the film frequently skims the surface of the novel’s thornier ideas—creation without responsibility, the monstrousness of neglect—in favour of lustrous tableaux. Still, when Jacob’s Creature fills the frame—anguish in the eyes, power in the gait—the film brushes greatness. Fans of elegant Gothic will be enthralled; purists may crave more blood and bile. It’s a grand, gorgeously mounted nightmare—just one that prefers satin gloves to a scalpel.
Movie Reviews
Movie Review: ‘Nuremberg’ – Catholic Review
NEW YORK (OSV News) – As the historical drama “Nuremberg” (Sony Pictures Classics) successfully reminds its audience, the trials held in the titular German city in the aftermath of World War II almost didn’t happen. What takes place in the uncertain lead-up to them kicks off the film’s action.
Summoned to the temporary prison for former Nazi leaders Allied forces nicknamed Camp Ashcan, Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek), a psychiatrist holding the rank of lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army, is assigned to assess its inmates. The senior — and by far most intriguing — figure among them is ex-Luftwaffe chief Hermann Goering (Russell Crowe).
Swayed by his preeminent patient’s deceptive charm, the analyst wavers between tentative friendship for him and the need to assist the military and legal authorities. The latter include Ashcan’s hard-driving commandant, Col. Burton C. Andrus (John Slattery), and, eventually, the lead American prosecutor, Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson (Michael Shannon).
Crowe’s multi-faceted performance as the wily Goering propels writer-director James Vanderbilt’s adaptation of Jack El-Hai’s 2013 book “The Nazi and the Psychiatrist.” By turns genial, cunning and — more consistently — impossibly vain, the World War I flying ace seeks to distance himself from the horrific crimes committed by the regime he subsequently served.
The principal moral point of the movie is that those bewilderingly evil actions — the full extent of which was only beginning to be understood as evidence was gathered for the international tribunal at which Goering would be tried — not only cannot be excused or minimized, they can’t even be contextualized by any feeble effort at establishing an imagined ethical equivalent.
Some moviegoers may conclude that Malek’s highly personalized performing style makes him a poor choice to play Kelley, insofar as the analyst is meant to serve as an Everyman conduit into the story for viewers. Yet his tightly wound, driven demeanor pairs well with the suave restraint with which Crowe endows Goering and helps keep the pace of the proceedings snappy.
As detailed below, “Nuremberg” includes a number of elements best suited to grown-ups. In light of the picture’s potential educational value in providing an accurate retrospective on a vital series of events, however, many parents may consider it acceptable — as well as informative — fare for older adolescents.
The film contains disturbing footage of crimes against humanity, a hanging, suicides, a scene of urination, partial nudity, several profanities, a few milder oaths, at least one rough term and a handful of crude and crass expressions. The OSV News classification is A-III — adults. The Motion Picture Association rating is PG-13 — parents strongly cautioned. Some material may be inappropriate for children under 13.
Read More Movie & TV Reviews
Copyright © 2025 OSV News
Movie Reviews
Labyrinth Anime Film Review
Within the first few minutes of director Shōji Kawamori‘s Labyrinth, protagonist Shiori laments that “without smartphones, humanity would be doomed”. From the events that later transpire, I suspect Kawamori’s opinion is quite the opposite. Kawamori is, of course, best known for his lifetime of work on the Macross franchise, which features mecha battles, idol singers, and love triangles in most of its entries. If you squint a little, each of these main obsessions is also present in Labyrinth. It seems that Kawamori can’t help himself. Whether these elements mesh together to make a satisfying film is another matter entirely. Whereas his most beloved film, Super Dimension Fortress Macross: Do You Remember Love?, is a timeless classic, Labyrinth‘s reliance on modern tech and the anxieties around it almost instantly date it.
At the end of the screening, with my head in my hands, I sighed to myself, “How in hell’s name am I supposed to review this?” It’s a movie that almost defies explanation; any attempt to summarise the plot is likely to leave me gibbering incomprehensibly. I guess I’ll have to try. Suffice to say, Labyrinth is not by any means a “good” film. However, it’s certainly an entertaining one, and often (unintentionally) hilarious. Watching along with a highly engaged audience at the Scotland Loves Anime film festival was probably the best mode of experience for Labyrinth, for without my fellow cinemagoers’ stunned, disbelieving laughter, I doubt I would have survived to the end of its bloated, almost two-hour-long runtime.
Shiori is supposed to be the audience insert, an anxious high school girl who constantly apologizes for her mere existence. The daughter of a titanic judo instructor with the most impressively imposing moustache this side of Ivo Robotnik, she rejects her family’s focus on self-improvement via martial arts. Instead, she records social media videos with her female best friend Kirara. Their friendship is somewhat unequal – Kirara is far more outgoing and confident, and Shiori secretly seethes that her videos accrue far more “likes” from the faceless online masses. In fact, Shiori uses a secret, anonymous account to spew her negativity onto the internet rather than owning it as part of herself.
It’s this sublimated jealousy and insecurity that not only fractures their friendship but also Shiori’s identity. When her beloved smartphone screen cracks, it sends ruptures through her reality, as her persona splits in two – the more anxious version trapped within an almost Silent Hill-like alternative dimension, a shadowy analogue to the real world but empty of people, and a more confident “ideal” version that instantly becomes more outgoing. Ideal Shiori dons a VTuber-style two-tone wig and sets her sights on becoming a modern media superstar, the most popular Japanese high school girl, with a goal of garnering 100 million “likes.” She views her anxious alter ego as an impediment, and frequently taunts her through her apparently cloned smartphone, which seems to be able to dial its identical equivalent in the digital world, somehow without generating network errors.
We mostly view the story through Anxious Shiori’s eyes. She journeys through a dark, ominous liminal space populated by the souls of others similarly sucked into the digital underworld, where they are transformed, unsettlingly, into the smartphone stickers that best approximate their personalities. Anxious Shiori herself tended to contribute to friend group chats mainly via stickers as a way to hide her true emotions, engaging only at a surface level. The constant demand for connectivity and reciprocal communication is shown to be exhausting and all-consuming; so, when Kirara completely disconnects and ghosts Shiori, she panics that maybe Kirara has also been sucked into this world and lost her soul. The only thing preventing Shiori from losing hers is that her smartphone remains charged. Yes, in Labyrinth all that stands between humanity and devolution into mute digital emoticons is the presence of a spare battery pack. I know that I can get anxious when out and about and running low on charge, but Labyrinth takes battery anxiety to the extreme.
Human souls are bound and pressed by enormous industrial devices that pound three-dimensional bodies into flat images, with reams of red digital text spewing from between heavy plates, clearly symbolising blood. It’s cool imagery that I wish the film had leaned into a little more heavily. If anything, the aesthetic is similar to the recent Hatsune Miku movie Colorful Stage, although with significantly less music, unfortunately.
Anxious Shiori meets Komori, a sad-looking pink bunny sticker person who seems to know a lot about this world – the eventual reveal of his true identity is probably meant to be a huge shock, but I guessed it instantly. It’s not the most subtly plotted of films. Komori is quite fun, especially when he becomes so hapless and useless that Shiori has to attach a dog collar and string to drag him around behind her, floating like a balloon and bumping into things.
If it wasn’t already deranged, Labyrinth‘s central plot goes full batshit insane later on, with the evil mastermind Suguru Kagami planning to “liberate everyone’s ideal selves,” and it’s up to Anxious Shiori and Komori to try to prevent this… somehow.
Aesthetically, the film has its moments, especially in the digital underworld that acts as a dark mirror to our own. Unfortunately, all of the character animation is accomplished using 3D CG, which, while it does a reasonable job of emulating 2D animation, lacks any real-life authenticity. The characters move like dolls rather than real, living, breathing characters. There’s something about the natural exaggeration of movement, such as squashing and stretching, and other techniques often employed in traditional animation that bring life to character movement, which is all but absent. Yes, there’s some reasonably amusing slapstick here and there, and funny character expressions, but it’s a far cry from the verve and atmosphere of Kawamori’s previous works.
For much of Labyrinth, the festival audience sat in silence until some of the nuttier plot decisions were met with incredulous guffaws. Mostly, the film plays itself very straight, which is odd for a story featuring a floating pink bunny character and an evil music producer who wants to rule the world. One particular scene where Kagami takes Ideal Shiori to his bedroom and begins to suggestively unzip his tracksuit top was met with hysterical audience laughter that will become obvious if you see the film.
Multiple similar examples litter Labyrinth, and it’s hard to tell if these insane choices that trigger such hilarity are deliberate or not, and that’s why the film is so hard to rate. None of the pieces fit together properly. Anxious Shiori, for most of the film, is a fairly unengaging, dull protagonist, though her fake/ideal version is much more fun, which is probably the point. Kagami makes for a somewhat underwhelming villain, with an unclear plan that seems overly convoluted. The rules of the world seem to change upon the writer’s whim, and crazy stuff happens mostly out of nowhere. It’s like a laundry list of bonkers ideas all strung together without any coherent plan.
I found Labyrinth a struggle to endure, yet found certain aspects very entertaining. Perhaps my mistake was watching it stone cold sober. As one of my fellow festival attendees noted, it’s probably best viewed with at least a few beers on board already. I certainly can’t unreservedly recommend Labyrinth, but if you’re hankering for some good old “WTF am I even watching right now?”, then Labyrinth has you covered.
-
Austin, TX2 days agoHalf-naked woman was allegedly tortured and chained in Texas backyard for months by five ‘friends’ who didn’t ‘like her anymore’
-
Culture1 week agoVideo: Dissecting Three Stephen King Adaptations
-
Education1 week agoOpinion | New York City Mayoral Candidates: Who Would Be Best?
-
Seattle, WA6 days agoESPN scoop adds another intriguing name to Seahawks chatter before NFL trade deadline
-
San Diego, CA1 week agoAdd Nick Hundley, Ruben Niebla to list of Padres’ managerial finalists
-
Business1 week agoCommentary: Meme stocks are still with us, offering new temptations for novice and unwary investors
-
Business1 week ago
Disneyland Resort lays off 100 people in Anaheim
-
Politics1 week agoVirginia school district slapped with complaint alleging new claims in viral trans locker room fight