Connect with us

News

Backers of Ban at Casinos Blow Smoke at Legislators

Published

on

Backers of Ban at Casinos Blow Smoke at Legislators


With prospects for a smoking ban in Atlantic City’s casinos looking hazier than ever, workers who want smoking banned took matters into their own hands, lips, and lungs on Thursday. Members of the United Auto Workers union disrupted a meeting of a state Assembly committee that had been scheduled to take a preliminary vote on a bill to ban smoking in the casinos by lighting cigarettes and blowing smoke toward legislators, the AP reports. That vote was canceled Wednesday night when one of the main champions of workers who want smoking banned in the gambling halls gave up on a bill that would end smoking in the nine casinos and embraced some measures the casino industry wants, including enclosed smoking rooms.

Seven members of the union, which represents dealers at three casinos in Atlantic City, began smoking in the meeting hall of the State House Annex, where, like virtually all other workplaces in New Jersey, smoking is prohibited. “We’re not allowed to smoke in your workplace, but you’re allowed to smoke in ours,” Daniel Vicente, a union regional director, told lawmakers through a cloud of exhaled smoke. He and the others were soon escorted out by state police and released without charges. “They say it’s OK for secondhand smoke to be blown in our faces all day, every day,” Vicente said later. “We wanted to know if it’s OK if we did that in their workplace. They said it was inappropriate and not allowed here.”

Angry workers said they want the Democratic leadership to force a vote on the original bill that would impose a total smoking ban. But state Sen. Vince Polistina, a Republican from the Atlantic City area who has appeared with casino workers at rallies in favor of a smoking ban, said the original bill is going nowhere. He said he’s writing a new measure incorporating proposals favored by the casino industry while still working toward the goal of keeping secondhand smoke away from workers and customers who don’t want it, per the AP. Pete Naccarelli, a Borgata dealer and a leader of the employee anti-smoking movement, said Polistina is “copying and pasting casino executive talking points and attempting to present them as a credible solution. It’s shameful and disgusting.”

Advertisement

(Read more smoking ban stories.)

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

In Cabinet Meeting, Musk Seems to Drastically Lower DOGE’s Savings Goal

Published

on

In Cabinet Meeting, Musk Seems to Drastically Lower DOGE’s Savings Goal

While stumping for Donald J. Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign, Elon Musk said he could cut $2 trillion from the federal budget. After Mr. Trump took office and placed Mr. Musk in charge of the budget-slashing so-called Department of Government Efficiency, Mr. Musk lowered that projection by half, to $1 trillion in the upcoming fiscal year.

In a cabinet meeting on Thursday, Mr. Musk appeared to set his group’s goal lower still.

“I’m excited to announce that we anticipate savings in ’26 from reduction of waste and fraud by $150 billion,” Mr. Musk told Mr. Trump, referring to the fiscal year, which runs from the beginning of October 2025 to the end of September 2026.

Mr. Musk’s group has slashed budgets and fired thousands of workers around Washington, but so far the DOGE website indicates that it remains far from reaching his goal of $1 trillion in savings next year. As of Thursday, the site claimed $150 billion in savings, with an itemized list of some of the purported cuts.

It was unclear if Mr. Musk meant to say that the $150 billion was merely what his team had found so far — meaning that $1 trillion in savings was still possible — or if that $150 billion was all it expected to find.

Advertisement

A White House official said $1 trillion in savings remained “the goal.”

Unlike a previous cabinet meeting, during which Mr. Trump had Mr. Musk speak at the outset, Thursday’s meeting began with the president asking Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to speak. Mr. Musk spoke later, and briefly.

In his remarks, Mr. Musk said that he answered someone who asked how he finds fraud in government by saying, “Actually, just go in any direction — that’s how you find it.” He described it as a “target-rich environment.”

But the website that Mr. Musk’s group has used to tout its savings has been plagued by errors, including triple-counting the same cancellations and claiming credit for cutting programs that ended under President George W. Bush.

Mr. Musk’s critics outside the administration — including Stephen K. Bannon, the far-right provocateur and former senior Trump White House official — have said publicly that the cost-cutting effort is directionally correct, but that Mr. Musk is unlikely to achieve $1 trillion in cuts.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Wall Street sell-off resumes as Donald Trump’s China tariffs spook investors

Published

on

Wall Street sell-off resumes as Donald Trump’s China tariffs spook investors

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

A brutal sell-off on Wall Street resumed on Thursday as banks and investors warned Donald Trump’s tariffs could tip the US into recession even as the president stepped back from a full-blown trade war.

The S&P 500 dropped 3.5 per cent in another day of turbulent trading and a sharp turnaround from the previous session’s 9.5 per cent surge. Wall Street’s benchmark share index is down 6.1 per cent for April.

The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite dropped 4.3 per cent after its best day since 2001. In currency markets, an index of the dollar against half a dozen peers tumbled 1.9 per cent, as the rush from US assets sent the Japanese yen, euro and UK pound rallying.

Advertisement

Markets had soared on Wednesday after Trump paused by 90 days the steep “reciprocal” tariffs on a swath of countries. The gains were a reprieve from the heavy selling across US markets, which had this week seeped into the $29tn Treasury market, the bedrock of the financial system.

But Wall Street banks and investors said the president’s decision to hoist duties on Chinese imports as high as 145 per cent and keep in place a 10 per cent universal tariff still presented a serious risk for the US economy.

“Combined with the ongoing policy chaos on trade and domestic fiscal matters, along with the still-large losses in equity markets and hit to confidence, it remains difficult to see the US avoiding recession,” JPMorgan said.

Goldman Sachs said it was “too early for the ‘all clear’” and warned that “while some immediate tail risks have been reduced, policy uncertainty remains very high and is likely to weigh on consumer and business activity”.

US Treasuries faced a burst of selling on Thursday, with the yield on the benchmark 10-year note up 0.11 percentage points at 4.41 per cent, leaving it roughly 0.1 percentage points below the week’s highs.

Advertisement

Krishna Guha, vice-chair of Evercore ISI, said: “Today’s trading has seen a rare, ugly and worrying combination of market moves with the dollar, bonds and equities lower amid renewed volatility and stress cross-asset markets.”

Markets remained under heavy pressure as Trump held a televised cabinet meeting in the White House. Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, answering a reporter who asked about the slide in markets, said, “I don’t see anything unusual today.” He answered the question after Trump said he had not seen the markets on Thursday.

Trump said about China: “We would love to be able to work a deal. They’ve really taken advantage of our country for a long period of time.” He also said he was prepared to bring back the broad reciprocal tariffs if other countries declined to forge new trade deals with Washington.

China on Thursday imposed its additional 84 per cent tit-for-tat tariffs against the US as planned, bringing its total levy on American imports to more than 100 per cent. President Xi Jinping signalled he would not back down from the escalating trade war, but Beijing made no immediate move to match Trump’s even higher rate.

“If you want to talk, the door is open, but the dialogue must be conducted on an equal footing on the basis of mutual respect,” said China’s commerce ministry. “If you want to fight, China will fight to the end. Pressure, threats and blackmail are not the right way to deal with China.”

Advertisement

The renminbi weakened to its lowest level since 2007 in the latest sign Beijing is willing to tolerate gradual depreciation in response to US tariffs.

Fears of the widening trade war between the world’s two biggest economies also drove oil prices lower again on Thursday, with international benchmark Brent settling down 3 per cent at $62.33 a barrel. West Texas Intermediate settled at $60.07 — a price that will threaten the country’s prolific shale sector, analysts have said.

The trade dispute with China, the world’s biggest exporter, has boosted the average US tariff on imports from the Asian country to 134.7 per cent, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics.

A separate analysis from the Yale Budget Lab said American consumers now face a tariff rate of 27 per cent, the highest level since 1903, when taking into account US tariffs and those imposed against America.

Uncertainty over Trump’s trade policies and objectives was likely to “beset markets and macroeconomic outlooks in the months and quarters ahead”, added Bill Campbell, global bond portfolio manager at DoubleLine.

Advertisement

“Overhanging uncertainty on tariffs will complicate business decision-making with respect to strategic issues such as where to maintain or relocate production facilities; cyclical issues such as the management of payrolls and lay-offs; and [capital spending].”

Reporting by Kate Duguid, Will Schmitt, Harriet Clarfelt and George Steer in New York and Steff Chávez and Aime Williams in Washington

Continue Reading

News

New York City’s tragically long history of helicopter crashes

Published

on

New York City’s tragically long history of helicopter crashes

Thursday’s horrifying tourist helicopter crash into the Hudson River that killed six people was one of several deadly tragedies involving the aircraft in recent years. At least 32 people have died in helicopter accidents in NYC since 1977, according to The Associated Press.

In 1977, the landing gear on a Sikorsky S-61L malfunctioned as passengers waited to board from the roof of the Pan Am Building. The chopper tipped on its side, and its spinning rotor blades killed four people — including film director Michael Findlay — and injured a fifth. A broken piece of blade fell down to the streets below and killed a pedestrian and injured another.

In 2009, nine people were killed when a Eurocopter AS350 tourist helicopter with five Italian tourists on board collided with a small private plane over the Hudson River near Frank Sinatra Park in Hoboken. The flight was operated by Liberty Helicopter Sightseeing Tours.

In 2018, a Liberty Helicopters flight operated for FlyNyon, also a Eurocopter AS350, went down in the East River, killing five people. Two passengers died at the scene and three others were pronounced dead at the hospital. A jury later awarded the family of the victims $116 million in a lawsuit.

In 2019, an Agusta A109E helicopter crash-landed on the roof of a 54-story building in Midtown Manhattan, killing the pilot, later identified as Tim McCormack. McCormack was the only person on board and known as a well-respected pilot. It was speculated by airport officials that he suffered a mechanical failure while in flight.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending