Connect with us

Wisconsin

The Rebound: Purdue 75 Wisconsin 69

Published

on

The Rebound: Purdue 75 Wisconsin 69


In a game that may come to define the Purdue Boilermakers this season, the Boilers went into the Kohl Center and controlled a matchup between the #6 ranked Wisconsin Badgers from start to finish. Holding the lead for just over 30 minutes of the entire game, Purdue was able to largely get what it wanted on offense while making the Badgers uncomfortable on defense outside of Tyler Wahl playing an amazing game in the post.

Let’s not waste a lot of time with small talk. Let’s get into ‘The Rebound!’

1 | Control the Tempo & Pace of the Game Early

Purdue really controlled the game from the tip to the end, even if Edey’s arm was held down to start and Purdue struggled to break the pressure at the end. It just seemed like, no matter the ups and downs of the game, Purdue had a poise and presence about them throughout the game where it didn’t ever seem like the game would ever get away from them. Purdue largely held a two possession lead throughout most of the entire game, only dipping to two points with 4:46 remaining before Purdue went on a quick 5-0 run to push the lead back to 7 points. Nothing in this game ever appeared to be put Purdue is doubt.

This video shows the composure that Purdue played with against Wisconsin. A coach, letting a sophomore guard make a correction to a set, and then letting them run it that way. Everything in that huddle is cool, calm, and collected.

Advertisement

Although the final moments of the game did appear to be a bit frantic and make Purdue uncomfortable, Wisconsin never was able to get within 5 points as Purdue seemingly made the plays that needed to be made. No matter what some Wisconsin media personality might say, the fouls that were committed (specifically to Braden Smith in the corner) were fouls and should have been called.

Grade: A

More so than any other statistic you could point to for Purdue victory, this is probably the biggest take away. Purdue just looked like the more talented and more poised team throughout that forty minutes. That type of confidence and poise will carry this team into March where things get ratcheted up on the intensity meter.

2 | Get on the Glass

Purdue once again dominated an area of the game where it can determine a number of different aspects throughout the game. Limiting possessions and second chance opportunities while also extending possessions by grabbing offensive rebounds for second chance points goes a long way to victories, especially when a team is on the road. Purdue at Wisconsin outrebounded the home team 42-29 and grabbed 14 offensive rebounds. Those numbers led to Purdue having 21 second chance points while limiting Wisconsin to just 14 points on 10 offensive rebounds. Had it not been for Tyler Wahl having himself his best offensive games this season with 20 points and 6 offensive rebounds, Purdue likely would have won this game by 12 or more. Wahl’s career high is 23 which he achieved twice in 2022.

Advertisement

Kayla Wolf-USA TODAY Sports

Advertisement

Grade: A

Outrebounding a solid team like Wisconsin is great but doing so by 13 and being on the road is even better. That’s one of those stats that Coach Painter likes to point to in terms of winning matchups that lead to winning games.

3 | Limit the Scoring from Guys Other Than AJ Storr

Well, I didn’t necessarily tag him for 20 points because he hasn’t been a big scorer for Wisconsin this season but limiting Storr to 14 points on 4-15 from the field and 0-4 behind the arc was amazing. It wasn’t like Storr was missing wide open shots either as Lance Jones, Cam Heide, and Ethan Morton all took turns at one point or another forcing him into tough jump shots. He did make his way into the lane at times but keeping him out of the lane and getting to the rim made all the difference for the Boilers in limiting Wisconsin from doing what they really wanted to do.

Purdue just did a heck of a job of funneling shooters into difficult spots and running them off the three point line as much as possible. At time, Purdue would leave their feet but it just didn’t seem like the Badgers were capable of putting the ball on the deck to take advantage of the Boilers with drives to the basket. A lot of that is likely due to a 7’4 menace roaming the middle of the floor but some of that is simply to Purdue following the defensive game plan.

Advertisement

Grade: A

Forcing Storr into 15 shots to get to 14 points, nearly 23% of the total shots the Badgers took was great. When you combine that with the entire defensive effort from the Boilers from start to finish, what you get is holding a team who had been averaging 78 points per game in their previous 9 games to 69 points.

And 1 | Get to the Foul Line and Make Your Free Throws

In the three games prior to Wisconsin, the Boilers had shot a poor 67% from the free throw line as a team. Just not a great percentage when they had shot nearly 73% in the games prior to that. I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt and including a 76% effort sandwiched in those three games. Against the Badgers, the Boilers were a very efficient and effective 18-23 for 78.3% from the free throw line. That type of percentage makes opponents pay dearly for playing too physical in an effort to stop Edey and the guards from getting to their spots. It’s one of the only ways you can really stop this offense beyond hoping they all have an off day.

Edey was a bit off again at the free throw with a 4-8 performance but there is little doubt that won’t get corrected in the five days the Boilers have off until their next game. Mason Gillis went 2-2, a second game in a row without a miss at the free throw line, to bump his average up to 87.5% on the season. If he had a high enough number to qualify for official stats in the B1G, his percentage would rank him third in the conference behind Jahmir Young (90.2%) and Marcus Domask (88.2%).

Grade A

Advertisement

Purdue likely needed to get 15 points at the free throw line to win this game and they grabbed 18. When you add those factors up and throw in being efficient and effective at the charity stripe, you always stand a good chance at winning no matter what the opponent is doing.

Prediction:

Purdue: 76 (75)
Wisconsin: 74 (69)

What a heck of a ballgame, am I right? These are two of the best teams in the country and the matchup was great with good offense, great defense, and a crowd that was engaged from start to finish (although the ‘F*** Zach Edey’ chants were a but confusing). Purdue just seemed like the team that was more in control of their emotions and poise is what you need in big time environments for big time games.

Overall Grade: A

That was an absolute masterclass in how to go into a hostile environment against a top rated team in the country and get a victory. Balance on offense, stout on defense, and limiting bad turnovers and second chance points. If Purdue plays that way the rest of the season, it’ll end in an updated video board message from Gene Keady and another #1 seed.

Advertisement

Player of the Game: Lance Jones

Jones’ spark he has brought to Purdue has been evident from day one but it has tended to shine brightest when Purdue needs him the most. Jones has an affinity for the big shot, so much so that Braden Smith had this to say after the game:

Jones had 20 points on 8-14 shooting with 6 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, and 0 turnovers. The transfer guard is proving that he is as valuable a piece to the Purdue puzzle as any other, mainly because he may have been the missing puzzle piece to a Purdue Final Four.

Play of the Game:

With just over a minute left in the game and Purdue holding a 66-61 lead, Connor Essegian took a wildly deep three that found its way into the hands of Tyler Wahl who had been the lone scoring threat for the Badgers late in the game. As he started to go into a set of post moves, Braden Smith swooped in and swiped the ball away until it found its way to Lance Jones. As Jones looked up and saw an open path to the bucket, he went coast to coast and scored to put the Boilers up 7. It was Jones’ final points on his way to a team leading 20.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

Game 12 Wisconsin football two-deep for Minnesota Gophers game Nov. 29 at Camp Randall Stadium

Published

on

Game 12 Wisconsin football two-deep for Minnesota Gophers game Nov. 29 at Camp Randall Stadium


MADISON – A look at the unofficial two-deep for the Wisconsin football team heading into its game against Minnesota at 11 a.m. Friday at Camp Randall Stadium.

OFFENSE

Quarterback

1 – Braedyn Locke, 6-1, 205, redshirt-soph.

2 – Mabrey Mettauer, 6-4, 230, fr.

Advertisement

Running back

1 – Tawee Walker, 5-9, 218, sr.

2 – Darrion Dupree, 5-10, 205, fr.

Receiver

1 – Bryson Green, 6-3, 213, sr.

2 – C.J. Williams, 6-2, 196, jr.

Receiver

1 – Vinny Anthony II, 6-0, 188, jr.

Advertisement

2 – Quincy Burroughs, 6-2, 212, r-soph.

Slot recever

1 – Will Pauling, 5-10, 187, r-jr.

2 – Trech Kekahuna, 5-10, 187, r-fr.

Tight end

1 – Riley Nowakowski, 6-1, 243, r-sr.

2 – Tucker Ashcraft, 6-5, 255, soph.

Advertisement

Left tackle

1 – Jack Nelson, 6-7, 316, sr.

2 – Barrett Nelson, 6-6, 302, r-soph.

Left guard

1 – Joe Brunner, 6-5, 313- r-soph.

2. – James Durand, 6-5, 305, r-fr.

Advertisement

Center

1 – Jake Renfro, 6-3, 302, r-sr.

2. – Kerry Kodanko, 6-2, 308, r-sr.

Right guard

1 – Joe Huber, 6-5, 310, r-sr.

2 – JP Benzschawel, 6-6, 312, r-jr.

Right tackle

1 – Riley Mahlman, 6-8, 308, r-jr.

Advertisement

2 – Kevin Heywood, 6-8, 325, fr.

DEFENSE

Line

1 – Ben Barten, 6-5, 308, r-sr.

2 – Elijah Hills, 6-3, 282, sr.

Advertisement

Line

1 – Curt Neal, 6-0, 290, r-soph.

2 – Cade McDonald, 6-6, 285, r-sr.

Outside linebacker

1 – Darryl Peterson, 6-1, 248, r-jr.

2 – Aaron Witt, 6-6, 247, r-jr.

Inside linebacker

1 – Jake Chaney, 5-11, 233, sr.

Advertisement

2 – Tackett Curtis, 6-2, 228, soph.

Inside linebacker

1 – Christian Alliegro, 6-4, 240, soph.

2 – Jaheim Thomas, 6-4, 245, r-sr.

Outside linebacker

1 – Leon Lowery, 6-3, 252, r-sr.

2 – Sebastian Cheeks, 6-3, 230, r-soph., or John Pius, 6-4, 250, r-sr.

Advertisement

Cornerback

1 – Ricardo Hallman, 5-10, 185, r-jr.

2 – R.J. Delancy III, 5-11, 193, r-sr., or Jonas Duclona, 5-10, 190, soph.

Strong safety

1 – Hunter Wohler, 6-2, 218, sr.

2 – Owen Arnett, 5-11, 210, r-jr.

Free safety

1 – Preston Zachman, 6-1, 212, r-sr.

Advertisement

2 – Austin Brown, 6-1, 210, jr.

Cornerback

1 – Nyzier Fourqurean, 6-1, 190, r-sr.

2 – R.J. Delancy, 5-11, 193, r-sr., or Xavier Lucas, 6-2, 198, fr.

Nickel back

1 – Austin Brown, 6-1, 210, jr.

2 – Max Lofy, 5-10, 188, r-sr.

Advertisement

SPECIAL TEAMS

Punter

1 – Atticus Bertrams, 6-3, 225, soph.

2 – Gavin Meyers, 6-1, 198, r-sr.

Field goal kicker

1 – Nathanial Vakos, 6-1, 205, jr.

2 – Gavin Lahm, 6-0, 213, jr.

Kickoffs

1 – Gavin Lahm, 6-10, 213, jr.

Advertisement

2 – Nathanial Vakos, 6-1, 205, jr.

Long snapper

1 – Cayson Pfeiffer, 6-0, 205, sr.

2 – Duncan McKinley, 6-2, 222, r-sr.

Holder

1 – Gavin Meyers, 6-1, 198, r-sr.

2 – Atticus Bertrams, 6-2, 225, soph.

Advertisement

Punt returner

1 – Vinny Anthony II, 6-0, 188, jr.

2 – Hunter Wohler, 6-2, 218, sr.

Kickoff returner

1 – Vinny Anthony II, 6-0, 188, jr.

2 – Trech Kekahuna, 5-10, 197, r-fr.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Where Wisconsin's class of 2025 ranks nationally after big-time addition of QB Carter Smith

Published

on

Where Wisconsin's class of 2025 ranks nationally after big-time addition of QB Carter Smith


Wisconsin football’s recruiting performance is far better than the current on-field product, to say the least.

Luke Fickell’s team has now lost four straight games after Saturday’s 44-25 defeat at Nebraska. It is just 5-6 on the season and 3-5 in Big Ten play, desperately needing a season-closing victory over Minnesota to clinch bowl eligibility.

There is more context behind that on-field performance, including the recent firing of offensive coordinator Phil Longo and historic blowout losses to rivals Iowa and Nebraska sandwiching hard-fought losses to top-ranked teams. That context doesn’t help the general trend of poor play.

But for those still optimistic about the Badgers’ future under Luke Fickell, the biggest calling card is his recruiting performance.

Advertisement

Wisconsin made headlines on Sunday when it landed a commitment from four-star class of 2025 quarterback Carter Smith. Smith is ranked as 247Sports’ No. 15 quarterback in the class and No. 164 overall player. Beating Florida State for his commitment was a statement for Fickell and his staff — even doing so after firing Longo just seven days earlier.

The addition of Smith brings Wisconsin’s class of 2025 to 25 total commitments — eight of which coming from blue-chip players. Notably, it rose the group four spots up to No. 21 in 247Sports’ national rankings.

The Badgers now boast the eighth-highest-rated class in the Big Ten, trailing just Ohio State (No. 2 overall), Oregon (No. 8), Michigan (No. 9), USC (No. 11), Penn State (No. 15), Washington (No. 18) and Nebraska (No. 20). The No. 21 ranking is an impressive follow-up after Luke Fickell finished the 2024 class with 247Sports’ No. 25 overall class and a Blue-Chip Ratio of 50%.

Smith’s addition continues a growing debate about how to weigh Wisconsin’s on-field struggles with its recruiting success. In reality, the 2025 football season will be somewhat defined by the performance of the 2024 recruiting class and another crop of transfers. If that strong recruiting doesn’t lead to improved on-field play, the clock may start ticking on his tenure.

Contact/Follow @TheBadgersWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Wisconsin Badgers news, notes, and opinion.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Takeaways from No.19 Wisconsin's 81-75 Win Over Pittsburgh

Published

on

Takeaways from No.19 Wisconsin's 81-75 Win Over Pittsburgh


WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, W.Va. – The news was positive every time Wisconsin head coach Greg Gard got the analytical report from video coordinator A.J. Van Handel, even though the results on the court were not. Despite some early flaws guarding back cuts and allowing dribble penetration, the Badgers were holding Pittsburgh under a point per possession. He just needed Wisconsin to take and make some better shots.

That, and John Tonje hoisting the Badgers on his back and carrying them over the finish line.

The resilience, toughness, and guts of the No.19 Wisconsin was on full display in front of a packed Colonial Hall at the Greenbrier Resort, as the Badgers got 33 points from Tonje and sound offensive execution in the second half to erase a 14-pint deficit in an 81-75 victory over Pittsburgh.

It’s the third November championship for Wisconsin (7-0) in the past four seasons and a victory that could serve as a springboard in the coming weeks, not to mention a nice thing to show the selection committee in four months.

Advertisement

Here are my takeaways from the foothills of the Alleghany Mountains.

Tonje Led The Second Half Charge

Tonje said that he hopes to live in Madison when he’s retired from playing basketball. At the rate he’s going, he might have to come back anyway for his jersey retirement.

Tonje was the hero again for Wisconsin and treated as such, going into the crowd to celebrate with the vocal fan base that made the trip and mobbed by his teammates while waiting to do his postgame television interview. It was the only time anybody got the better of him after halftime.

Advertisement

Shaking off a 2-for-8 start, Tonje was 9-for-11 in the second half. He was 6-for-6 from the line, relentlessly going inside and getting rewarded because Pittsburgh kept reaching. Knowing the primary defenders on him were starting to rack up fouls, and that the Panthers haven’t shown to be a particularly deep team to this point, Tonje kept his head down and kept attacking.

“I was trying to be aggressive from the start,” said Tonje, who made all nine of his two-point shots in the second half, most coming at the rim or in the paint. “I didn’t shoot the ball well early, but I just kept with it. My coaches and teammates believed in me. I stayed with it and did everything I can in my power to get the win.”

After falling into the trap of taking quick shots or long-range jumpers, a problem that plagued the Badgers last season, Wisconsin found the gaps in Pittsburgh defense. UW scored 54 points in the second half, registered points on 83.3 percent of its possessions, and averaged a robust 1.8 points per possession.

“I don’t think we started the second half with the type of force that’s necessary,” Pittsburgh coach Jeff Capel said. “We allowed them to climb back into the game and really get into a great rhythm offensively, and then they just became really tough to guard … Their physicality wore us down.”

Tonje scored 25 of the second-half points but he had help. Kamari McGee scored eight of his 10 points in the last half and hit all three of his shots, including a pair of clutch three-pointers that were timely in the final six-plus minutes, one giving UW the lead and another extended it to four with 2:54 to go.

Advertisement

“We kept at it,” said John Blackwell (14 points). “We kept getting to the rim (and) stayed aggressive. Obviously, our shots weren’t falling in the first half, but we didn’t quit. We told ourselves at halftime just keep going. The shots are going to fall. We trusted each other.

“JT did his thing by getting to the rim, doing what he do best.”

Named the tournament’s most valuable player, Tonje averaged 24.0 points and 6.5 rebounds per game over UW’s two wins.

“He just drives and throws his body around,” Capel said of Tonje, one of only six players nationally to have two 30-point games this season. “We weren’t able to sustain the discipline required to guard someone like that. You can’t reach. He does a really good job of getting his body into yours. He’s really strong with the ball. He exposes it. You think you can swipe, and he gets a great whistle, and he’s earned that because it’s consistent.”

Wisconsin Is Handling Top Guard Play

McGee said Friday that the close call against UTRGV Monday was not a wake-up call for the Badgers, only that it emphasized the need to be better polished in defensive areas. Call it what you want, but the Badgers’ defense took a major step in slowing down guard play in West Virginia.

Advertisement

Pittsburgh’s backcourt of Ishmael Leggett and Jaland Lowe averaged 33.2 points, 12.4 rebounds, 8.0 assists, and 4.5 steals per game. They combined for 43 points, 14 rebounds, seven assists, and eight steals in Friday’s win over LSU. They managed 33 points on 32 shots.

“I just tried to match his energy,” Blackwell said of guarding Leggett, who finished 6-for-15 and 0-for-4 from three. “I know he picked up some quick fouls and he sat. All I can do is try to match his energy, because he’s a great player.”

The Badgers also took away Lowe’s ability to cleanly pass the ball. He finished with five assists but committed four turnovers.

“If we can guard ball screens as much as possible two on two and not have to send quite as much help, we knew we were going to have to plug the paint,” Gard said of the plan for Lowe.“Try to force him into some mid-range stuff. I didn’t think we were good at it early. He got loose on us, pinched us off, and got a couple lobs to Corhen, but I thought we got better with the back side of bumping the roller and plugging the lane. We forced him into some tougher shots.”

Wisconsin caught a break when Damian Dunn (13.0 ppg, .526 3FG) rolled his ankle and injured his hand two minutes into the game and didn’t return. Freshman guard Brandin Cummings replaced him and managed only two points.

Advertisement

With how poorly Wisconsin’s offense was in the first half (36.7 percent, .794 points per possession), the Badgers leaning into their defense was critical.

“We have to give all credit to the coaches,” Blackwell said. “They prepared us well to know what their tendencies are, what they like to do. We just trust each other. Our bigs got our back if they get past us with good wall ups. We just trust our technique.”

Frustrating opposing guards has become a common theme.Arizona preseason All-American Caleb Love generated more technical fouls than made three-pointers against UW’s guards. He finished 2-for-13 from the floor and scored six points before fouling out

In Friday’s semifinals against UCF, which possessed a guard trio of Jordan Ivy-Curry, Keyshawn Hall, and Darius Johnson that scored 62.4 percent of its points, the Badgers’ ability to challenge them with movement and spacing held the group to 9-for-36 from the floor.

Wisconsin Showed Growth vs Physical Rebounders 

The Panthers have proven to be one of the better rebounding teams in the country in the season’s first month. Having won the rebounding battle in five of its first six games, Pitt wasaveraging 41.2 rebounds per game, was 21st nationally in defensive rebounds (30.83) and had four players averaging at least 6.0 rebounds per game.

Advertisement

They took the Badgers to task in the first half. Finishing the first half plus-four on the glass, Pitt’s first 11 points were all on actions toward the rim, mostly on back cuts behind UW’s defense, dribble actions where a Pitt player hit the cutter, or a guard attacking the paint to hit an open pull-up jumper.

Even after reserve forward Zack Austin switched things up with a three-pointer, Pittsburgh went right back to the post with an alley-oop and multiple driving layups. The 6-10 Cameron Corhen was the biggest benefactor of UW’s lapse defense, as the 68.0 percent FG shooter had 11 points on 5-for-6 shooting in the opening half.

Wisconsin 2-for-10 to start and was largely absent in the glass when shots went up. UW started 0-for-5 from the perimeter and most attempts didn’t have a red jersey close to the rim. UW’s first offensive rebound came at the 10:54 mark, but the possession ended with Blackwell airballing a three-pointer with the shot clock about to expire, a possession that didn’t include a post touch.

Wisconsin was averaging .533 points on its first 15 possessions. UW raised it modestly at halftime because Blackwell, McGee, Tonje, and Nolan Winter (11 points) started getting to the rim and converting.

The inability to match a team’s frontcourt physicality has been an underlining theme when the Badgers have faced Power-Four schools. Arizona outrebounded UW, 52-28, including 24-2 on the offensive glass, and gave up 13 boards to forward Tobe Awaka.

Advertisement

UCF wasn’t nearly as big as Arizona, but the Knights still outrebounded Wisconsin, 41-39, with all 11 players getting at least one offensive rebound.

Things flipped in the second half. Senior Steven Crowl (6 points, season-high 9 rebounds, 3 assists) helped draw two quick fouls on Corhen, sending him to the bench for five-and-a-half minutes of the second half. He attempted only two shots in the final 12:51 after he returned.

With Corhen out and Guillermo Diaz Graham at the five, Wisconsin’s low-post offense ran more efficiently by creatingmore lanes for Tonje to attack and more space to attack the glass. After getting only two offensive rebounds in the first half, the Badgers had nine in the second half that led to 11 second-chance points.

“Once we got rolling in the second half we went to him quite a bit,” Gard said on Crowl. “I liked his physicality on Corhen. That’s one thing I felt Steve’s advantage was on Corhen on both ends of the floor was he could be physical. Corhen is a really good player but a little lighter than Steve. To be able to keep a big body on Corhen, and when we got him in foul trouble, we were able to go at the rim a little bit more with everybody else.”

Lengthy Delays

The championship game was scheduled to start at 5:30 p.m. eastern, roughly 30 minutes following the conclusion of the third-place game between LSU and UCF. The Knights’ collapse made the evening a waiting game.

Advertisement

UCF led by 20 in the first half, 18 with 12:57 left, and 14 with 8:31 to go, but ended up losing, 106-102, in triple overtime.

When the teams finally took the court, went through introductions, and were ready to start, one of the electronic game-and-shot clocks above the basket shorted out. Unable to restart the system, or find a long enough extension cord, officials agreed to shut off the working shot clock to even the playing field.

Throw in the jump ball needing to be done twice after a Pitt player jumped the gun, the game didn’t officially start until 6:43 local time, an hour, 13 minutes late.

That delayed doesn’t account for the two brief stoppages in play in the second half when the bank of lights that illuminated center court kept flickering on and off.

“I thought we handled all the adversity well,” Capel said. “What we didn’t handle was Tonje.”

Advertisement

By The Numbers

6 – Wisconsin turned the ball over just six times, including only two in the second half. Averaging 9.4 turnovers per game, Wisconsin has had fewer than 10 turnovers in four games.

17.5 – The Badgers held Pittsburgh to 5-for-23 (21.7) from three-point range and held their two Power-Four Conference opponents to 7-for-40 (17.5) on threes.

30 – After scoring just eight points in the first 10 minutes, the Badgers scored 73 in the final 30 minutes.

60 – Tonje has made 60 free throws this season to lead all Division 1 players. His 63 attempts are tops in the Big Ten and tied for fourth nationally. He’s the first UW player since Brad Davison (2017-18) to have made at least 10 free throws in three games.

300 – Gard coached his 300th game on Sunday, the fourth-most games of any coach in Wisconsin history. He improved his record to 193-107 (.643) overall and 72-22 (.766) in regular season nonconference games.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending