Wisconsin
No Mow May creates buzz across Wisconsin
![No Mow May creates buzz across Wisconsin](https://wpcdn.us-east-1.vip.tn-cloud.net/www.channel3000.com/content/uploads/2022/04/j/m/41901d2fc8f1eed86958a8c30e90d16aa5642d7c.jpg)
New ordinances think about well being of pollinators to assist with well being of meals provide
VERONA, Wis. — It’s a motion that’s taking maintain throughout Wisconsin. Because the greenery begins to emerge across the state this spring, some people are content material to let it develop. And develop. And develop.
No Mow Might is a follow that acquired consideration throughout the nation when it began in Appleton in 2020. Residents have been allowed to easily let their lawns go, ignoring regularly-enforced metropolis ordinances concerning the peak of their garden in order that pollinating bugs like bees, flies and butterflies might have that necessary first meal of spring.
The decline of bees has been well-documented lately, and the U.S. Division of Agriculture says that pollinating bugs have an $18 billion annual influence on crops.
Alder Kate Cronin first put forth the thought in Verona final 12 months, the place a handful of residents took half in a take a look at run. This 12 months, the town council voted to make the idea everlasting by an 8-1 vote in January.
“No Mow Might isn’t truly in regards to the grass, it’s in regards to the flowering crops that develop within the grass,” says Cronin, “and a couple of third of the meals Individuals eat is definitely pollinated by bees, so it’s actually necessary that we assist a wholesome bee inhabitants.”
Such guidelines don’t mandate that you just let your weeds and grass go shaggy in Might, however municipalities merely received’t punish residents who select to let their lawns go. By June 1, enforcement of garden size usually resumes, and residents shall be required to maintain these lawns good and tidy as soon as once more.
P.J. Liesch, an entomologist with and the director of the UW-Madison Insect Diagnostic Lab, says it’s all a couple of wholesome first meal for rising bugs.
“The thought behind this idea of No Mow Might is to depart a few of these crops on the market,” says Liesch, “in order that the pollen and nectar from these weedy crops can function meals sources for the pollinators round us.”
For the numerous Wisconsin residents who yearly deal with their lawns and don’t have any flowering weeds, Liesch says there are many issues you are able to do to assist pollinators get pleasure from a wholesome begin to their spring — and likewise summer season.
“Now we have pollinators energetic in Might but in addition in April… June, June, July, August and into the autumn,” says Liesch. “We may help them out on this window in Might, however if you wish to maximize the advantages to bees and different pollinators, you actually have to consider ideas like this over longer intervals of time all through the rising season.”
Verona and Appleton aren’t alone in adopting No Mow Might insurance policies of their municipal governments. The Village of Shorewood Hills began its program final spring and presently gives indicators to residents focused on taking part. Cross Plains is doing a one-year No Mow Might pilot program. Solar Prairie is giving it a go for the primary time this 12 months.
Different locations across the state together with Oshkosh, Wisconsin Rapids and La Crosse are weighing related proposals.
READ MORE: La Crosse Parks Division encourages ‘No Mo Might!’ to assist pollinators equivalent to bees
Admittedly, Cronin says, letting individuals know such coverage exists hasn’t been with out its challenges.
“We have to perform a little bit higher job publicizing it as a result of there have been some individuals who stated, ‘My neighbors simply thought I used to be being lazy,’” she stated. “So this 12 months we’re going to have yard indicators that individuals can put up to say I’m doing this for the bees.”
Verona plans to have extra details about how residents can get these indicators at this hyperlink.
Click on to study extra about packages in Shorewood Hills and Cross Plains.
And in Solar Prairie, yard indicators at the moment are obtainable for pickup on the Parks, Recreation, and Forestry Division workplace at 2598 W Major St #2. You’ll be able to decide them up throughout enterprise hours of 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Starting in Might, the division may have late hours on Friday that stretch till 7 p.m. for people who want extra time to choose up indicators (Fridays solely).
COPYRIGHT 2022 BY CHANNEL 3000. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS MATERIAL MAY NOT BE PUBLISHED, BROADCAST, REWRITTEN OR REDISTRIBUTED.
![](https://newspub.live/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/np-logo.png)
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Elections Commission rules second Vos recall effort has failed
![Wisconsin Elections Commission rules second Vos recall effort has failed](https://www.wpr.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/robin_vos.jpg)
For the second time this year, the Wisconsin Elections Commission has ruled conservative activists failed to gather enough valid signatures to recall Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos from office, this time finding that some of the signatures were collected after the legal deadline.
In a 4-2 vote, the commission found that 188 signatures were collected by the Racine Recall Committee outside of a 60-day window in state law. That’s despite a recommendation by commission attorneys two days earlier saying recall organizers had collected enough signatures to force an election.
At issue were around 188 signatures collected on May 27, which was Memorial Day, and May 28. Because organizers gathered only 16 signatures more than required, subtracting 188 from that total sunk the petition.
Stay informed on the latest news
Sign up for WPR’s email newsletter.
The motion to deem the recall petition insufficient was made by Commissioner Don Millis, who was appointed to his seat by Vos in 2022.
Before the vote, Commissioner Mark Thomsen, a Democratic appointee, urged his colleagues to vote against Millis’ motion “that saves his guy,” insinuating that Millis was protecting Vos. Thomsen noted that some members of the recall effort “probably want to put us in prison” because of past decisions, but he said the Wisconsin Constitution gives them the right to recall officeholders.
“Personally, I think the recall is a waste of time, waste of money,” Thomsen said. “But there is a constitutional right for these folks and for us to say we are going to throw the sufficiency out now on this technical rule is going to be a farce.”
Millis pushed back on Thomsen’s claims and said his motion was “not trying to save anyone’s hide” and voting to exclude signatures collected outside the 60 day period was the right thing to do.
“This is not the first time that we have disagreed with (commission) staff on recommendations,” Millis said. “That’s why we have a commission and not a staff making these decisions.”
A social media post from the Racine Recall Committee responding to the commission’s vote said the panel had “the elections commission of “silencing” “silenced” voters in Racine County.
They repeated claims of Vos protecting WEC Administrator Megan Wolfe, who the group and other conservatives have accused of bending election laws in 2020.
“Despite collecting well over the required signatures, the commission, led by Wolfe, ignored their attorneys’ recommendations to certify the recall petition,” the committee said. “Now, more than ever, we must vote out Robin Vos and demand the dismantling of the Wisconsin Elections Commission!”
While Wolfe leads staff at the WEC, she is not one of the six voting members of the commission.
A spokesperson for Vos did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
It could be difficult for Vos’ conservative critics to vote out the powerful speaker with no recall election on the books. Vos represents an overwhelmingly Republican district, and his GOP challenger in the August primary already dropped out of the race.
Wisconsin Public Radio, © Copyright 2024, Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System and Wisconsin Educational Communications Board.
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Supreme Court says an order against an anti-abortion protester violated First Amendment
![Wisconsin Supreme Court says an order against an anti-abortion protester violated First Amendment](https://www.gannett-cdn.com/authoring/authoring-images/2024/06/27/PDTN/74231810007-ap-23261605374913.jpg?auto=webp&crop=5273,2967,x0,y274&format=pjpg&width=1200)
Madison, Wis. – The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Thursday that an order barring an anti-abortion protester from coming close to a Planned Parenthood nurse violated his First Amendment free speech rights and must be overturned.
The court, controlled 4-3 by liberals, ruled unanimously in ordering that the injunction be dismissed.
A Trempealeu County judge in 2020 barred Brian Aish from being near nurse Nancy Kindschy who sometimes worked in a small family planning clinic in the western Wisconsin city of Blair. Kindschy said Aish threatened her by saying bad things would happen to her or her family if she didn’t quit her job.
Aish had argued that his comments, made from a public sidewalk, were protected free speech under the First Amendment. The Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
Aish regularly protested between 2014 and 2019 at the clinic, primarily holding up signs quoting Bible verses and preaching his Christian and anti-abortion beliefs, according to the court ruling. But starting in 2019, Aish began directing his comments toward Kindschy, targeting her with messages that she argued were threatening.
In October 2019, Aish said that Kindschy had time to repent and “it won’t be long before bad things will happen to you and your family” and that “you could get killed by a drunk driver tonight,” according to the court.
The Trempealeu County judge issued a four-year injunction barring Aish from being near Kindschy. Aish appealed. A state appeals court upheld the injunction against Aish in 2022, but the Supreme Court on Thursday ordered that it be dismissed.
While the Wisconsin case was pending, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in 2023 that made it more difficult to convict a person of making a violent threat. That case involved a Colorado man who was convicted of stalking a musician.
In that case, the nation’s highest court said prosecutors must show that “the defendant had some subjective understanding of the threatening nature of his statements” and that “the defendant consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence.”
The Wisconsin Supreme Court cited that ruling in its order Thursday, saying the lower court had failed to find that Aish “consciously disregarded a substantial risk that his communications would be viewed as threatening violence.”
“Aish’s statements could not be true threats of violence because he disclaimed any desire for violence to befall Kindschy,” Justice Rebecca Bradley wrote in a separate opinion, concurring with the majority one written by Justice Rebecca Dallet.
Attorneys for Aish and Kindschy did not return messages.
Kindschy has since retired and the clinic where she worked is now closed.
Wisconsin
Forum For Wisconsin Assembly Dist. 73 – Fox21Online
![Forum For Wisconsin Assembly Dist. 73 – Fox21Online](https://www.fox21online.com/content/uploads/2024/06/m/q/66686eca6a1796f10706212e71857ea4df17d204.jpg)
SUPERIOR, Wis.– Two democrats vying for for Wisconsin Assembly Dist. 73 held a public forum in Superior this evening.
This comes after Republican Representative Angie Sapik announced she would not seek re-election after the redistricting maps were approved.
District 73 now covers the northern portion of Douglas and Bayfield counties.
Wednesday evening, Candidates John Adams and Angela Stroud answered submitted questions from residents.
The two appearing to agree on the majority of the topics. They both are against the proposed Nemadji Trail Energy Center, they agree there’s a serious need for affordable housing and are on the same page with tougher gun control regulations.
“This is a country with a 2nd amendment that the court has defined as an individual right. We have a strong gun culture, we also can absolutely regulate guns,” said Stroud. “There is nothing in statute that says that regulation is a violation of our second amendment.”
“I think the responsibly of a legislator is to finally craft those red flag laws that keep oversight on a judge that’s going to have to make that difficult decision to take away a person’s gun,” said Adams.
The republican candidate for District 73 is Frank Kostka, who says one of his goals is to support good paying jobs in Northern Wisconsin.
The primary election is August 13, the general election–November 5.
-
News1 week ago
NYC pastor is sentenced to 9 years for fraud, including taking a single mom's $90,000
-
Crypto1 week ago
Idris Elba Promotes Cryptocurrency in West Africa – BORGEN
-
News1 week ago
Read the Ruling by the Virginia Court of Appeals
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump targets House Freedom Caucus chair in intra-party Republican primary feud
-
News7 days ago
Tracking a Single Day at the National Domestic Violence Hotline
-
Politics7 days ago
Trump classified docs judge to weigh alleged 'unlawful' appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith
-
News7 days ago
Supreme Court upholds law barring domestic abusers from owning guns in major Second Amendment ruling | CNN Politics
-
World1 week ago
Concentration camp museum director joins campaign to ban AfD