Connect with us

Wisconsin

For jobs paying at least $50K a year in Wisconsin, about two-thirds require a college degree, according to a new report

Published

on

For jobs paying at least $50K a year in Wisconsin, about two-thirds require a college degree, according to a new report


About two in three jobs paying $50,000 a year or more in Wisconsin require some sort of college degree, according to new nonpartisan research. And that demand for a degree is expected to increase.

The nonprofit Wisconsin Policy Forum analyzed the state’s projected job openings from 2020 to 2030, how much those jobs pay and what type of degree is usually needed to get one. Released this month, the research puts Wisconsin-specific numbers to a national issue that lawmakers, educators and students alike are grappling with: how to make higher education accessible and affordable, especially given the time and money it takes to earn a degree.

An analysis by the University of Wisconsin-Madison found Wisconsin’s student loan debt is low compared to most other states. Federal student loans still directly affect more than a half-million Wisconsin residents — an estimated 715,800 people — for an average of $32,230 in loans each; that’s nearly one in four people in the labor force, according to 2020 data.

Wisconsin is incentivizing K-12 schools to create programs to give high schoolers experience firsthand with jobs and college before they graduate. In part, that’s in response to the cost of college and workforce shortages. More high schoolers statewide are participating in dual enrollment programs, for example, which allow them to earn free or low-cost college credits. State lawmakers have recently increased funding pools for youth apprenticeship and high school programs leading to credentials in high-demand jobs.

Advertisement

The Wisconsin Policy Forum’s recently released report defines a “high-paying job” as paying at least $50,000 annually. That’s equivalent to $24.04 an hour, according to a wage calculator by financial company ADP. The definition of a “living wage” changes based on whom you ask, but a commonly cited calculator by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology defines it as $16.06 an hour, or just over $33,000 annually, for a single person or $35 an hour, or just under $73,000 annually, for household of one adult, and one child.

Either way, those wages are much higher than Wisconsin’s minimum wage of $7.25, or hourly pay for its most common, lowest-paying jobs. For example, school bus monitors are paid an average of $12.60 an hour; child care workers $13 and home health care aides $14.09, according to Wisconsin-specific data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

More: Wisconsin politicians have specific goals for careers-focused education. What are they?

Report: For jobs paying over 50K annually, 58% usually require a four-year degree

Whether because of retirements or career changes, job projections suggest an average of 357,000 positions need filling annually from 2020 to 2030.

Advertisement

Most of those open jobs — three in four — don’t require a college degree and pay less than $50,000 a year.

The question of how to get a higher-paying job often comes down to training. Focusing their research just on jobs paying at least $50,000 annually, researchers from the Wisconsin Policy Forum found:

  • 58.1% of jobs generally required at least a four-year degree;
  • 5.9% generally required a two-year degree, certificate or technical diploma;
  • 36.1% generally required related training or experience, but not a traditional degree.

Of the most in-demand, higher-paying jobs in Wisconsin, the one most in demand through 2030 is nursing. The field sees more than 3,600 openings each year and pays an average annual salary of $73,540. Becoming a registered nurse at minimum requires a two-year degree associate’s degree, although many prospective nurses go through four-year degree programs.

Just 7% of job openings in Wisconsin pay at least $75,000 annually. Of those, 91% require at least a bachelor’s degree, according to the Wisconsin Policy Forum analysis.

Still, 1 in 3 higher-paying jobs don’t come with requirements for traditional degree

Reading between the lines, the Wisconsin Policy Forum report suggests a substantial portion of jobs paying over $50,000 a year —  over one in three, or 36% — don’t require a college degree.

Five of the 10 most in-demand, higher-paying jobs in Wisconsin through 2030 fall into that category. They include:

Advertisement
  • Sales representatives, such as in manufacturing and wholesale
  • Agricultural managers, such as farmers and ranchers
  • “First-line supervisors of production and operating workers,” a job title used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to describe managers in several industries, such as manufacturing and retail
  • “First-line supervisors for office and administrative support workers,” another U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics title, which describes office or administrative managers in industries like manufacturing, transportation, business support or health care
  • Carpenters

Many high-paying jobs that don’t technically require a degree do require apprenticeships. That means they still come with time spent in a classroom and, often, years of on-the-job training.

Apprenticeships in Wisconsin are overseen by the Department of Workforce Development. State standards require apprentices to spend at least 144 hours taking classes related to their profession, usually through a technical college. Employers must also pay an hourly wage for an apprentice’s time learning in the classroom. The state does not require employers to cover tuition or per-credit costs, although many do in exchange for employment commitments.

More: What’s a good paying job in Milwaukee? These are the industries with the highest-paid workers

Cleo Krejci covers higher education, vocational training and retraining as a Report For America corps member based at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Contact her at CKrejci@gannett.com. Follow her on Twitter @_CleoKrejci. Support her work with a tax-deductible donation at bit.ly/RFADonation.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

VP Harris to return to Wisconsin next Thursday for her fourth visit this year

Published

on

VP Harris to return to Wisconsin next Thursday for her fourth visit this year


WISCONSIN — Vice President Kamala Harris will travel to Milwaukee on Thursday, May 16, according to the White House.

The vice president will deliver remarks as part of her Economic Opportunity Tour. 


What You Need To Know

  • Vice President Kamala Harris will travel to Milwaukee on Thursday, May 16
  • The vice president will deliver remarks as part of her Economic Opportunity Tour
  • Harris last visited La Crosse, Wis. to highlight two new actions by the White House aimed at supporting the care economy
  • Details of where Harris will visit have not yet been released

This will be Harris’s fourth visit to the battleground state this year. Harris last visited La Crosse, Wis. in late April to highlight two new actions by the White House aimed at supporting the care economy.

The announcement comes one day before President Joe Biden is set to travel to Racine County and her visit comes two weeks after former President Donald Trump campaigned in Waukesha.

Advertisement

Details of where Harris will visit have not yet been released.



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin election leader ousted 6 months before election in swing state

Published

on

Wisconsin election leader ousted 6 months before election in swing state


Trump campaigns in Wisconsin and Michigan

Advertisement


Trump campaigns in key swing states of Wisconsin and Michigan

03:30

Advertisement

Milwaukee’s election leader has been ousted by the mayor, just months before Wisconsin’s largest city will be in the spotlight in a presidential swing state.

Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson announced Monday that he would be replacing Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall with her deputy, Paulina Gutierrez.

Milwaukee has been at the center of attention in Wisconsin, a state known for close elections and where four of the past six presidential contests have been decided by less than a percentage point.

In 2020, former President Donald Trump and others were quick to cry fraud after late-arriving results from Democratic-dominated Milwaukee helped President Biden narrowly carry the state by just under 21,000 votes. Recounts demanded by Trump confirmed Mr. Biden’s victory.

A recent swing state poll by CBS News showed that the 2024 presidential race between the candidates remains extremely tight, with both Mr. Biden and Trump eliciting feelings of worry and anger. With inflation looming large, many voters don’t say there’s been improvement in their state’s economy post-pandemic, and about half said they believe it has actually gotten worse in the pandemic’s aftermath.

Advertisement

Why was Claire Woodall ousted?

The change has nothing to do with how Woodall ran elections, but instead had to do with “other issues internal to the election commission office and to city government that raised concern,” said the mayor’s spokesperson Jeff Fleming. He declined to say what those issues were.

“People see one side on this side of the camera, but there are other things on the other side of the camera that I also have to deal with and that’s exactly what I did with my decision,” Johnson told WISN-TV. He declined to elaborate.

Woodall did not return messages seeking comment. Her replacement, Gutierrez, also did not return messages.

Woodall has been outspoken about the challenges she and other election officials have felt in recent years.

She has described being harassed and threatened after the 2020 election via email, phone calls and letters to her home — threats serious enough that she has an assigned FBI agent to forward them to.

Advertisement

The change came a week after Woodall’s former deputy, Kimberly Zapata, was sentenced to probation and fined $3,000 after being convicted of misconduct in office and fraud for obtaining fake absentee ballots. Zapata argued that she was acting as a whistleblower, exposing vulnerabilities in the state’s election system.

Johnson and others who work in elections stressed that the change would not affect how elections are run in Milwaukee.

“Paulina’s integrity and capabilities are ideally suited to this position,” Johnson said in a statement announcing the change. “She will lead the office at an important juncture when public scrutiny of the work of the department will be extremely high. I have confidence in her, and I will make certain the department has the resources it needs to fulfill its duties.”

Gutierrez has only been a staff member at the city election commission for a little over a year. Neil Albrecht, who led the office for 15 years before retiring in May 2020, has offered his assistance as a volunteer, Fleming said. Woodall took over for Albrecht in 2020 and had been leading the office until now.

Following his reelection in April, Johnson had to renominate all of his Cabinet-level positions for city council approval. That is why he decided to make the change at this time, Fleming said.

Advertisement

None of the city’s three election commissioners returned messages seeking comment. But Ann Jacobs, a Democratic member of the Wisconsin Elections Commission from Milwaukee, said she was surprised by the move.

“Changes like this are always challenging, but given how many elections Wisconsin has there’s no ‘good time’ for these sort of changes to happen,” Jacobs said. “I expect the office to be professional and to continue their work and that the election will be run smoothly and properly.”

Jacobs stressed that elections are run by teams of people.

“The administration of elections isn’t something that is dependent on one person,” she said. “It is dependent on the workflow, the task flows and the operations of an entire office.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin court case paves way for bird-friendly buildings | Great Lakes Echo

Published

on

Wisconsin court case paves way for bird-friendly buildings | Great Lakes Echo


The Ryerson University Student Center in Toronto has bird-friendly, patterned glass windows. Image: Rick Ligthelm

By Clara Lincolnhol

A Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision that upheld the state’s first ordinance requiring bird-friendly building construction could spread similar policies to other cities.

Advertisement

Already Middleton, Wisconsin, has passed such an ordinance following the ruling last October,  said Brenna Marsicek, director of outreach at the Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance.

The court’s ruling confirms that bird-friendly building ordinances don’t violate the state building code, said Matt Reetz, executive director of the Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance.

Bird-friendly construction uses patterned glass to make windows visible to birds. Critics argue that the ordinances impose requirements that are additional or more restrictive than uniform statewide standards, according to court documents.

White dots make the windows of the Consilium Towers in Toronto visible to birds. Image: Christine Sheppard

Madison passed the state’s first bird-friendly ordinance in 2020. Local residents had expressed the need for bird-safe buildings after witnessing birds that died after striking windows, Marsicek and Reetz said.

Advertisement

But building developers and real estate agents sued, claiming such ordinances conflict with the state’s uniform construction code. It was the first time a bird-friendly ordinance had been legally challenged, Reetz said.

An initial circuit court ruling in August, 2022 said the ordinances are valid exercises of zoning power. They regulate features of buildings and do not impose construction standards. Developers appealed.

As the legal battle continued, other communities put similar ordinances on hold, Reetz said. But now, with the case settled, Wisconsin communities can look to the ruling with confidence while crafting legislation.

“If they were able to successfully remove the ordinance it probably would have affected a lot of other municipalities’s ability to institute their own bird-safe ordinances,” Reetz said.

About 599 million birds die each year from window collisions, according to the American Bird Conservancy. The problem has always been a topic of concern among bird conservation groups, but it hit mainstream news in 2024, Reetz said.

Advertisement

This year a window collision killed Flaco, a beloved owl living in New York City. And a staggering 1,000 migrating songbirds died in one night after flying into the McCormick Place in Chicago. These incidents incited public outrage and led to recent demands for more protective legislation.

Four Great Lakes states – Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota and New York – have adopted bird-friendly regulations, according to the American Bird Conservancy.

A set of guidelines and recommendations for the development of efficient policy is listed by the American Bird Conservancy. It rates Madison’s ordinance as “recommended with reservations.”

Reetz said that the rating is most likely because the ordinance only affects taller buildings. But the ordinance is a step in the right direction.

“Hopefully it opens the door to better, more comprehensive, more effective solutions in the future,” he said.

Advertisement

Although some ordinances are better than others, any ordinance is better than nothing as it saves birds, said Bryan Lenz, glass collisions program director at the American Bird Conservancy.

Some ordinances fail to include building design rules, are optional or only impact certain sections of buildings or only apply to buildings of certain stories, he said.

An unrecommended ordinance “just doesn’t go as far as we would like it to,” Lenz said. “Even the “not recommended” (ordinance) is still a good thing and it’s still saving birds.”

The conservancy’s list serves as a guideline for policy making, he said. Cities then have a reference as to what better policy looks like.

Birds mistake windows as open space, he said. Their forward facing field of vision isn’t as great as people’s. They don’t understand the architectural cues that people do. Besides, people run into glass all the time.

Advertisement

“If I went downtown and put a bunch of large clear glass panes in the street, people would smash into those constantly,” Lenz said.

Companies make bird-safe patterned glass for commercial buildings. The market is not there yet for residential buildings, but there are ways people living in them can make their windows safe.

The easiest thing to do is put an external screen on the outside of your window. People can apply rows of small dots to their windows to reduce collisions, Lenz said. More information is listed on the American Bird Conservancy’s website.

One of the greatest barriers to combating bird window collisions has been the public’s lack of knowledge of what to do, he said.

“We need to have people hear about this a whole bunch and get it normalized,” Lenz said. “The more attention it gets, the better.”

Advertisement

Residential buildings (1-3 floors) account for 43.6% of collisions. An individual residential building kills on average 2.1 birds annually. There are 122.9 million residential buildings in the United States. An estimated 258.1 million birds die from these buildings annually.

Low-rise buildings (4-12 floors) account for 56.3% of collisions. An individual low-rise building kills on average 21.7 birds annually. There are 15.1 million low-rise buildings in the United States. An estimated 327.67 million birds die from these buildings annually.

High rise buildings (12 or more floors) account for 0.1% of collisions. An individual high-rise building kills on average 24.3 birds annually. There are 0.5 million high-rise buildings in the United States. An estimated 12.15 million birds die from these buildings annually.

The percentage of high rise collisions are low because there’s a smaller number of high rise buildings throughout the landscape. However, high rise buildings are dangerous and can lead to mass casualty events, Lenz said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending