Connect with us

Wisconsin

Wisconsin court case paves way for bird-friendly buildings | Great Lakes Echo

Published

on

Wisconsin court case paves way for bird-friendly buildings | Great Lakes Echo


The Ryerson University Student Center in Toronto has bird-friendly, patterned glass windows. Image: Rick Ligthelm

By Clara Lincolnhol

A Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision that upheld the state’s first ordinance requiring bird-friendly building construction could spread similar policies to other cities.

Advertisement

Already Middleton, Wisconsin, has passed such an ordinance following the ruling last October,  said Brenna Marsicek, director of outreach at the Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance.

The court’s ruling confirms that bird-friendly building ordinances don’t violate the state building code, said Matt Reetz, executive director of the Southern Wisconsin Bird Alliance.

Bird-friendly construction uses patterned glass to make windows visible to birds. Critics argue that the ordinances impose requirements that are additional or more restrictive than uniform statewide standards, according to court documents.

White dots make the windows of the Consilium Towers in Toronto visible to birds. Image: Christine Sheppard

Madison passed the state’s first bird-friendly ordinance in 2020. Local residents had expressed the need for bird-safe buildings after witnessing birds that died after striking windows, Marsicek and Reetz said.

Advertisement

But building developers and real estate agents sued, claiming such ordinances conflict with the state’s uniform construction code. It was the first time a bird-friendly ordinance had been legally challenged, Reetz said.

An initial circuit court ruling in August, 2022 said the ordinances are valid exercises of zoning power. They regulate features of buildings and do not impose construction standards. Developers appealed.

As the legal battle continued, other communities put similar ordinances on hold, Reetz said. But now, with the case settled, Wisconsin communities can look to the ruling with confidence while crafting legislation.

“If they were able to successfully remove the ordinance it probably would have affected a lot of other municipalities’s ability to institute their own bird-safe ordinances,” Reetz said.

About 599 million birds die each year from window collisions, according to the American Bird Conservancy. The problem has always been a topic of concern among bird conservation groups, but it hit mainstream news in 2024, Reetz said.

Advertisement

This year a window collision killed Flaco, a beloved owl living in New York City. And a staggering 1,000 migrating songbirds died in one night after flying into the McCormick Place in Chicago. These incidents incited public outrage and led to recent demands for more protective legislation.

Four Great Lakes states – Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota and New York – have adopted bird-friendly regulations, according to the American Bird Conservancy.

A set of guidelines and recommendations for the development of efficient policy is listed by the American Bird Conservancy. It rates Madison’s ordinance as “recommended with reservations.”

Reetz said that the rating is most likely because the ordinance only affects taller buildings. But the ordinance is a step in the right direction.

“Hopefully it opens the door to better, more comprehensive, more effective solutions in the future,” he said.

Advertisement

Although some ordinances are better than others, any ordinance is better than nothing as it saves birds, said Bryan Lenz, glass collisions program director at the American Bird Conservancy.

Some ordinances fail to include building design rules, are optional or only impact certain sections of buildings or only apply to buildings of certain stories, he said.

An unrecommended ordinance “just doesn’t go as far as we would like it to,” Lenz said. “Even the “not recommended” (ordinance) is still a good thing and it’s still saving birds.”

The conservancy’s list serves as a guideline for policy making, he said. Cities then have a reference as to what better policy looks like.

Birds mistake windows as open space, he said. Their forward facing field of vision isn’t as great as people’s. They don’t understand the architectural cues that people do. Besides, people run into glass all the time.

Advertisement

“If I went downtown and put a bunch of large clear glass panes in the street, people would smash into those constantly,” Lenz said.

Companies make bird-safe patterned glass for commercial buildings. The market is not there yet for residential buildings, but there are ways people living in them can make their windows safe.

The easiest thing to do is put an external screen on the outside of your window. People can apply rows of small dots to their windows to reduce collisions, Lenz said. More information is listed on the American Bird Conservancy’s website.

One of the greatest barriers to combating bird window collisions has been the public’s lack of knowledge of what to do, he said.

“We need to have people hear about this a whole bunch and get it normalized,” Lenz said. “The more attention it gets, the better.”

Advertisement

Residential buildings (1-3 floors) account for 43.6% of collisions. An individual residential building kills on average 2.1 birds annually. There are 122.9 million residential buildings in the United States. An estimated 258.1 million birds die from these buildings annually.

Low-rise buildings (4-12 floors) account for 56.3% of collisions. An individual low-rise building kills on average 21.7 birds annually. There are 15.1 million low-rise buildings in the United States. An estimated 327.67 million birds die from these buildings annually.

High rise buildings (12 or more floors) account for 0.1% of collisions. An individual high-rise building kills on average 24.3 birds annually. There are 0.5 million high-rise buildings in the United States. An estimated 12.15 million birds die from these buildings annually.

The percentage of high rise collisions are low because there’s a smaller number of high rise buildings throughout the landscape. However, high rise buildings are dangerous and can lead to mass casualty events, Lenz said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Wisconsin

What should passengers off a jet in Wisconsin be handed, like the lei in Hawaii?

Published

on

What should passengers off a jet in Wisconsin be handed, like the lei in Hawaii?


Our political blowhard, Adam Murphy, joins to answer the toughest question: What should we hand to people landing in Wisconsin, like getting a lei off the jet in Hawaii? We also discussed the less-than-half effort from Republicans in the state Legislature to overturn vetoes, plus WIZM on Reddit.


La Crosse Talk PM airs weekdays at 5:06 p.m. Listen on the WIZM app, online here, or on 92.3 FM / 1410 AM / 106.7 FM (north of Onalaska). Find all the podcasts here or subscribe to La Crosse Talk PM wherever you get your podcasts.


Got some great answers from Murphy and callers to that question and spent a good part of the show discussing it.

Advertisement

We also hit on Republicans in the state Legislature (17:30) calling themselves back into session — the Legislature has been off since mid-March and wasn’t coming back into session until next year, after the elections — to try and override 36 of Gov. Tony Evers’ vetoes. You’ll be surprised at how big a failure that was.

Ended the show (33:00) talking about a post on Reddit about WIZM comments and whether or not they should be “moderated” or deleted. We did not have time to get to the part where someone said I was middle-left in political leaning.

Murphy has degrees in economics and political science from UW-Milwaukee. He’s also owns a small business, called Big Bang LLC in Milwaukee.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

University of Wisconsin-Superior honors its graduates

Published

on

University of Wisconsin-Superior honors its graduates


SUPERIOR — The University of Wisconsin-Superior class of 2024 was recognized Saturday, May 18 at Siinto S. Wessman Arena.

According to UWS, more than 650 students from 33 different countries were eligible to receive diplomas for Saturday’s commencement ceremony — including 437 bachelor’s degrees and 198 master’s degrees. There also were 46 undergraduate students with double majors.

Many graduating students decorated their caps for commencement festivities at UWS Saturday, May 18, 2024, such as this one that features a Bible verse.

Holden Law / courtesy of the University of Wisconsin-Superior

Advertisement

Graduating students included 218 first-generation students. The oldest graduate is 72 years old and the youngest is 20.

Miles Dempsey.jpg

Miles Dempsey celebrates receiving his diploma during UWS graduation ceremonies at Wessman Arena in Superior Saturday, May 18, 2024.

Holden Law / courtesy of the University of Wisconsin-Superior

Advertisement

Chancellor Renée Wachter presided over the ceremony and presented diplomas to students who earned associate, bachelor’s and master’s degrees.

Our newsroom occasionally reports stories under a byline of “staff.” Often, the “staff” byline is used when rewriting basic news briefs that originate from official sources, such as a city press release about a road closure, and which require little or no reporting. At times, this byline is used when a news story includes numerous authors or when the story is formed by aggregating previously reported news from various sources. If outside sources are used, it is noted within the story.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Wisconsin

Wisconsin Republican leader says party may need to embrace absentee ballot drop boxes

Published

on

Wisconsin Republican leader says party may need to embrace absentee ballot drop boxes


play

MADISON – The leader of the Wisconsin Republican Party is not ruling out urging voters to utilize absentee ballot drop boxes during the fall presidential election even as Republicans are in court seeking to stop their use.

Advertisement

Republican Party of Wisconsin chairman Brian Schimming said twice this week he will urge Republicans to take advantage of all forms of voting, including returning ballots to drop boxes, if the state Supreme Court overturns a ban on the use of drop boxes in a case the liberal-controlled court will likely decide in the coming weeks.

“I have spoken nationally, in the state, and at local levels about the need for Republicans to be realistic and if the state law that affects this election says we’ll have drop boxes or we end up with ballot harvesting, we’re going to do what it takes to win,” Schimming told reporters Saturday at the state GOP convention in Appleton. “All I can tell you as chairman is I’m not going to leave any potential advantage that we might have on the table. Period.”

Earlier this week, Schimming also said in an interview with WisconsinEye he is “not going to sit around and leave tools on the table.”

“You have to deal with reality when you’re state chair,” he said in the WisconsinEye interview. “I can see a situation where we have to deal with a change in state law on drop boxes … but we’ll be ready for all that.”

Advertisement

Schimming’s comments come as the state GOP and Republican National Committee have urged justices on the state Supreme Court not to overturn the court’s previous ruling banning the use of ballot drop boxes that are not inside election clerks’ offices.

“There is no justification here — special or not. Voters must deliver their absentee ballots in one of twoways: by mail or in person, to the municipal clerk. Drop boxes do neither,” attorneys for the state and national GOP wrote in a brief to the court as part of the lawsuit under review.

“Like anything of value, elections are targets for malicious actors. Even if fraud is rare, it is still a threat. And because elections are the very essence of our democracy, it is essential that people perceive them to be run according to the highest standard of integrity,” the attorneys wrote.

“Short-circuiting those safeguards — and imposing a novel drop-box requirement that the Legislature never enacted, the Governor never signed, and the voters never ratified — would contravene the manifest purpose of the statute.”

Advertisement

Supporters of drop boxes say clerks have wide discretion over what tools should be used to administer elections in their communities, noting drop boxes had been in use for decades leading up to a 2022 court decision that banned them. Liberal justices on the court questions the conclusion the former conservative majority reached in its 2022 decision.

Wisconsin Republicans have struggled to project a clear message on absentee voting since former President Donald Trump, the 2024 GOP presidential candidate, sought to sow distrust in his election loss in 2020 by blasting the safety of mail-in voting.

Schimming has for months sought to create a public campaign to the party faithful to embrace absentee voting in order to combat Democratic turnout. But at the same time, Trump continues to argue against the idea in visits to the state. During a rally in Waukesha earlier this month and in an interview this week with a local TV reporter, Trump said he his preferred voting strategy is one-day voting with paper ballots.

In an interview with the Journal Sentinel earlier this month, Trump did not commit to accepting the results of the election.

Advertisement

Schimming and the state’s top elected Republican, U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, urged supporters of Trump at Trump’s April rally in Green Bay to also embrace early voting — a form of absentee voting that Democrats have heavily promoted in recent elections.

But when Trump took the stage at a rally in Green Bay, he again sought to dampen trust in the state’s election system by promoting the false claim that he would have won the presidential contest in Wisconsin 2020 if it had not been for election malfeasance driven by absentee voting in Milwaukee.

U.S. Rep. Bryan Steil, a Republican from Janesville who represents the state’s 1st Congressional District, conveyed a different message during Saturday’s state GOP convention, however.

“If we want to win, if we want to win as Republicans and as conservatives, we need to use every legal tool in the toolkit to get the job done. And that’s going to require people going out, voting early, banking the vote, and driving out the turnout in the state of Wisconsin,” Steil said.

Molly Beck can be reached at molly.beck@jrn.com.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending